Yes. Well, the – so if we could wave a magic wand and have a business that doesn’t necessarily doesn’t have a casino in it, that’s in a good location, that we could rotate – has sufficient meeting space that we could rotate our customers into, yes, we’d love it. Reason is, in our large groups, these 26,000 large groups, that rotate from mark-to-market, year-by-year. Approximately 50% sometime in their rotation want to go to Las Vegas. We have 50% never want to go to Las Vegas. They don’t like the market, they don’t want to there, because it’s too disruptive to their particular conventions. But the reality is, that all of the big hotels with big convention space have casinos in them. And for a REIT that is structured like ours, that’s a problem. And the only way we could be Las Vegas with the Casino in the middle of it is to essentially put a triple net lease arrangement in that would, do look a whole rotational strategy, because we couldn’t be there actively pushing customers of our business into that business. So there are structural impediments here, but if tomorrow morning, there was a hotel without a casino that came available that at 300,0000 square feet or 400,000 square feet of meeting space, yes, we’d like it. But our strategy doesn’t – we don’t need to be in Las Vegas, the 50% the big groups, that go out of system once every three or four years, if they go out of system and go out of Vegas, that’s not a problem for us. All we need to do as a company – with the amount of five big hotels right now, all we need to do is, I don’t know, Patrick, 700, 800 of these large groups a year total. About 100 in each hotel or less in each hotel. So our business strategy doesn’t require us to be in this market. But if we could get in it in the right way, the right structure show we could rotate customers into it, we would.