Good afternoon and welcome to the Royal Gold’s Fiscal 2018 Second Quarter Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Karli Anderson, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning and welcome to our discussion of Royal Gold’s second quarter fiscal 2018 results. This event is being webcast live and you will be able to access a replay of this call on our website. Participating on the call today are Tony Jensen, President and CEO; Bill Heissenbuttel, Vice President, Corporate Development; Stefan Wenger, CFO and Treasurer; Mark Isto, Vice President, Operations; and Bruce Kirchhoff, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. This discussion falls under the Safe Harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. A discussion of the company’s current risks and uncertainties is included in the Safe Harbor and cautionary statement in today’s press release and slide presentation and is presented in greater detail in our filings with the SEC. Now, I will turn the call over to Tony.

Thanks, Karli and good morning. I am not able to be with the team in Denver, so I just have a few brief opening remarks. Bill is going to give you an update and overview of the quarter, followed by Stefan, with a financial update and then we will open the lines for a Q&A session. But before we do that, let me just emphasize a few points. First, today, we are reporting another solid and steady quarter of good operating results driven by volume and price. Second, our financials are reflective in the tax reform recently passed in the United States and we have adjusted our financial statements accordingly. While this resulted in higher effective tax rates for the quarter, we welcome the long-term benefits of the reduced corporate taxes going forward. Third, we are pleased that Mount Milligan is operating again albeit at reduced capacity. We expect lower deliveries from Mount Milligan principally in the September quarter due to the current water restrictions at the site. And finally, fourth, we continue to generate strong cash flows, which we are using to strengthen our balance sheet for future acquisition opportunities. I will turn the call to Bill.

Good morning and thank you for joining the call. I will begin on Slide 4. We delivered continued strong operating performance in our second fiscal quarter. We recorded high single-digit increases in revenue, cash flow and GEO volume from the year ago quarter driven by a higher gold price, which was up 4% from a year ago, increased gold production at Andacollo and Wassa and Prestea and our newest operating property Rainy River. Like all other U.S. companies, we were required to recognize the impact of the new U.S. tax legislation in the quarter in which it was enacted. Our reported loss of $0.23 per share reflects the impact of U.S. tax reform and also the effect of a currency election at one of our Canadian subsidiaries that should help reduce volatility at our tax rate, but which also had a non-cash impact to our reported earnings per share. Stefan will provide more details on that in a moment. In such a noisy quarter, I will highlight that our adjusted earnings of $0.41 per share was right in line with consensus and consistent with our performance over the last few periods. Our cash flow is dedicated to the pursuit of new opportunities, the payment of dividends and debt reduction. We paid out $16 million in dividends in the second quarter, which is equivalent to a 21% cash flow yield. We reduced $50 million of debt in the second quarter, the fourth straight quarter in which we have paid down debt and the outstanding balance on our revolving credit is now $150 million. Our balance sheet is strong and we have about $975 million of total liquidity. On to Slide 5, we have provided some updates on our producing properties. I will start with Rainy River, which is our newest producing…

Thanks Bill. I am on Slide 8. In Q2 we delivered another solid and steady quarter with revenue of over $114 million and operating cash flow of $76 million. While we reported the loss per share of $0.23, adjusted results of $0.41 were up 16% from the prior year quarter. Tax reform and other adjustments created a bit of noise in our reported numbers. So I will walk you through those changes here. During the December quarter, we recorded one-time tax charges totaling $42.3 million or $0.64 per share related to new tax legislation and to a functional currency election for tax purposes. Of the $42.3 million, $26.4 million was associated with tax legislation and $15.9 million was associated with the functional currency election. Only $11.5 million of these charges will result in cash tax payments to be paid over 8 years, while the remaining balance, are non-cash. Absent the tax legislation and functional currency election, our earnings per share would have been $0.41 for the second quarter. And now a bit more on the new tax law. On December 22, 2017, H.R. 1, originally known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law in the United States. As a United States domiciled company, we expect that the new tax law will have a positive long-term impact on Royal Gold’s future financial results through the reduction in U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and by allowing us to efficiently repatriate future earnings from our foreign subsidiaries primarily from Switzerland. However, upon adoption of the tax legislation, we were required to record a one-time repatriation tax of $11.5 million on being repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries and to reassess certain balance sheet assets and liabilities resulting in $14.9 million of additional tax expense. In addition at…

Thanks, Stefan and Bill. So in summary, while the quarter had a couple of significant one-time events, we are pleased that the United States has modified its tax code to be more competitive internationally. From our point of view, these changes are substantial improvement from the prior tax code and will be unbalanced positive for our business. Near-term catalysts to watch are the ramp up of production at Mount Milligan and Rainy River as well as the development projects underway at Cortez Crossroads and Peñasquito’s Pyrite Leach, which we expect will start up in late calendar 2018 with revenue building into 2019. In addition, we will be speaking more about our Peak Gold joint venture in the coming quarters as we work through the preliminary economic analysis. In closing and as I mentioned earlier, Royal Gold has delivered another quarter of solid and steady operational performance, generated strong operating cash flow and continue to strengthen the balance sheet. We are positioning the company today to take advantage of future acquisition opportunities. With that operator, we will open the line for Q&A, if we have any.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Lucas Pipes with B. Riley FBR. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning, everybody.

Good morning, Lucas.

I wanted to follow-up a little bit on the Pascua Lama development then specifically I think you identified the $470 million or so as the carrying value for your royalty interest as of December 31. And on a percentage basis by the accounting definition, what does this Pascua Lama royalty represent roughly of your portfolio? Thank you.

Lucas, let me just explore the question just a bit more. Are you asking how much of the reserves does this makeup with Royal Gold or what’s the nature of the question exactly?

No, you have a carrying value of $470 million.

Right.

And what percent of your total carrying value on across your portfolio, does that represent? Thank you.

Okay. Yes, thanks Lucas for the clarification. Stefan, do you have that percentage at your fingertips there?

I can just give you the numbers, $417 million of our balance sheet that has $2.8 billion of mineral interest on it. So, you can do the math there.

Got it. And then how do you – it sounds like…

The book value, just to be clear.

Got it. And so it sounds like you are still evaluating the situation what are the potential pathways from here on forward with this particular interest?

Yes, I think the first thing we need to do is understand the current circumstances upon which Barrick took their write-down and understand how the project looks at the present time, but beyond that, we are very much looking forward to Barrick finishing up their underground study and that seems to be their preferred pathway at this time. We don’t have any particular guidance to provide you any further than what Barrick has given us and given the public, but I do know that there is a couple of additional Barrick public comments that will be coming forward in their financial reporting, which I believe is as soon as next week and then I think they also have a Investor Day on the February 22. So we certainly will be looking for a little more clarification as I am sure you will as well, Lucas.

Yes, that’s very helpful. Thank you. That makes perfect sense. And maybe switching over to Mount Milligan, can you tell us and maybe for the ones who don’t follow Centerra, just a little bit of an overview as to what measures are taken to maybe provide a little bit of a longer term solution to the water issues? Thank you.

Well, look we have been operating there for several years and we haven’t had a situation there in the past with regard to water and it was bit of a combination of the number of years of very dry summers and then the very harsh winter weather that we received in December. So, the operation hasn’t had water balance problem in the past, but having said that, with the work that is required now, the system would be even more robust, because they will have additional water wells that are permanently in place there in the pumps, not permanently in place. There is probably a desire to have surface water permits for the longer term as well. So I think we will have a much more robust water balance going forward than what the project even had in the past.

Got it. Thank you. And then maybe to one last follow-up question on the Pascua Lama side, any covenants tied to the net asset value or would that be not impacting any of your debt instruments, if they were write-down?

This is Stefan. There are no covenants tied in that net asset value. ROI covenants are related to net debt to EBITDA and then interest covered ratio, which both of which are covered very well.

Excellent, great. Well, thank you. I really appreciate your color and good luck this year.

Thanks, Lucas.

[Operator Instructions] Next question is from Josh Wolfson with Desjardins. Please go ahead.

Thanks. I just had a couple of very fun tax questions. Maybe Stefan its best directed towards you. In terms of the expected repatriation benefit, are you able to quantify what the new, I guess, penalty would be for repatriating capital back to the U.S. etcetera?

Sure, I am happy to take that. And really the U.S. with respect to the tax reform one of the benefits to us is that it moves towards a territorial system. So in the past, we were paying the local tax rate in our foreign subsidiaries and then if we were to move the cash back to the United States, we would have to top up to the 35% rate, but today the U.S. has moved more towards a territorial system and following the one-time $11.5 million repatriation tax that I mentioned in my remarks, there is no additional tax for our repatriating dollars back to the U.S. So, it really provides us a lot of flexibility.

Okay. Well, that’s a big benefit for sure. And I guess in terms of the structure of the debt currently, my understanding is the converts are held in the U.S. and the credit line is held outside the U.S., is that correct?

No, both instruments are in the U.S.

Okay. And then lastly in terms of cash taxes this quarter, they were higher than expected, it seemed like the $11.5 million you mentioned that will be paid over a longer period of time, were there any short-term impacts from the changes in tax laws for cash taxes this quarter or is that just normal variance that we saw?

That’s just the normal course. The second quarter is usually a larger quarter for estimated tax payments in U.S. and then so there is nothing unusual, the $11.5 million that I spoke of will be paid over 8 years. So, that wouldn’t have played into this December quarter.

Alright. That is it for me. Thank you very much.

Thanks, Josh.

Our next question is from Tanya Jakusconek with Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, gentlemen. Well, good morning to you guys. Have some questions on tax, if I could Stefan, just on going forward now with the U.S. tax reform, is the 17% to 23% the normalized tax rate that we should see like fiscal 2019 onward?

Sure. Happy to give a little color, that rate is what we are estimating for the rest of this year. We don’t typically give guidance further out in that. However, I can say – I can just give you a general comment on how – what our tax situation will be for our foreign subsidiaries. For Switzerland, our streaming business today, we would look for to pay taxes at a rate of about 13.1% going forward on all our streaming income. And then our royalty business will be taxed at the higher of either the 21% U.S. rate or in some instances like in Canada where there is a higher tax rate it would be at the local rate. I remind you that our streaming business is about 70% of our business now, so, you can look to the math there. Essentially, we will give better guidance once we get to 2019, but that sort of gives you a couple of points as to where our income is taxed.

Okay. Now, that’s very helpful. Thank you. And then maybe keeping on with your reporting your first copper inventory level this quarter, can you just give us an idea of what you believe to be a normal level of copper inventory going forward that you are liable to keep?

Well, I don’t know, this is Tony, I don’t know if we have a number at hand. Mark, do you have anything that you would provide I think just why you are thinking about that, I would say somewhere around 20,000 gold equivalent ounces converting the copper back to gold would be a general number that we have had in the past, Tanya, but with regard to copper specifically I will just ask Mark if he might have something there?

Well, I think our strategy has really been to sell the coppers that came in, I think this is probably a little bit better question for Stefan to give us answer on, but…

I can comment Mark and Tony hit on the head, you typically were carrying about 20,000 GEOs in inventory every quarter and we try not to build inventory. So this quarter just as a reflection of timing we received a shipment late in December of copper from Mount Milligan that we did not sell. So typically, we would sell copper over a shorter period of about – within about 3 weeks after we receive it. So depending on the timing of shipments, we may have a balance similar to what you saw at the end of December in inventory, but depending on timing it could be zero as well.

Okay, now that’s helpful. And maybe Tony, if you could comment a little bit, you are generating a lot of cash, you mentioned the payment reducing your debt, you have mentioned the increase in dividends that you look at annually. Is your strategy for acquisition still in the $100 million to $500 million range still focused on precious metals maybe a little bit of what you are seeing out there and if that has changed at all?

Yes, thanks, Tanya. We are very much focused on business development activities, but $100 million to $500 million that you mentioned as far as the range goes that’s kind of where the market bears today, we would certainly have more capacity, more desire to do larger deals, but generally we are not seeing the billion dollar deals that we did 2 years ago. So while we are ready to do those kinds of things and capable, the market is at a bit of a lower level. We are seeing good deal flow. And in the absence of any deals, we will continue to service that debt. That was our plan all along. We didn’t issue any shares when we did the acquisitions of $1.4 billion a couple of years ago. We took on what we thought was efficient debt. I think it’s proving to be that. So, we are still paying for the acquisitions we did sometime ago without any dilution to our shareholders. So, that’s where we are focused reducing debt and building the company to do additional acquisitions when they become available and we always are very, very dedicated to that dividends and you are right we take that up in November of each year, but we just don’t see ourselves backing away from that. We have been able to service that dividend in any kind of gold price that’s come our way over the last 20 years. I will certainly continue to make that a cornerstone of the company.

And Tony, what about the focus on just the precious metals, is that still the focus gold and silver?

Yes, thanks for the follow-up. I forgot about that in your initial question. Very much, precious metals focused, we at times see some non-precious things mostly base metals that might come our way and we will have a look at those that they come our way. And if the size is right, so that doesn’t upset the balance of precious metals in our portfolio and if the quality is right, you might see us do some modest deals there, but we are very much focused on precious metals side and I should say very much focused on gold.

And is it more streaming deals you are seeing or I mean there is some portfolios of royalties within companies, is that a mixture of the two or is it mainly stream?

Yes, I think it’s fair to say that we are seeing a mixture of the two. Anything new that we create there is efficiencies associated with the streaming of products. So generally, new products will be on the streaming side, but we are always – we are always looking for new royalties and as you heard me say in the past the casino royalty that I didn’t like. So, we are very much looking forward to any of those that come to market at a reasonable price.

Okay, that’s good. Congrats on the quarter.

Thank you very much, Tanya. Thanks for the questions.

Our next question is a follow-up from Josh Wolfson with Desjardins. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Just one follow-up question on the tax rate it was mentioned for the Swiss streams, the 13.1% number, is that higher than the old number of I think it was 8.75 because of the U.S. tax law changes or is that – that was always the same and this is just an effective sort of rate that was not previously talked about?

Yes, Josh, Tony here. So you are remembering correctly, we have a current rate that’s just here under 9% as our Swiss rate, but we anticipated that, that would be moving very close to the rate that the U.S. has put on now for international income. And so we don’t look at that the 13.1% is a significant slippage in any degree with regard to our effectiveness in getting new business opportunities.

Okay. But it’s safe to assume that the new streaming rate will be slightly higher than the old rate, is that 13.1 versus 8.75 is that correct?

On a long-term basis, that’s what I should say, that’s what you should be building in your models going forward for our international streaming business.

Got it. Okay. That’s it from me. Thank you.

Thank you, Josh.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Tony Jensen for any closing remarks.

Alright. Well, thank you for joining the call today. We very much appreciate your interest and continued support of Royal Gold. We look forward to updating you in the progress during our next quarterly call. We apologize for being a little bit disjointed with three different locations, but the team did a wonderful job and we very much look forward to updating you as information comes to us. Bye for now.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.