Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Douglas Dynamics Fourth Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder this call maybe recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today’s conference, Mr. Bob McCormick, Executive Vice President and CFO. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you. Welcome everyone and thank you for joining us on today’s call. Two quick items before we begin. First, please note that some of the information that you will hear during this call will consist of forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. These statements express our expectations, anticipations, beliefs, estimates, intentions, plans and forecasts. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, our actual results could differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. For more information regarding such risks and uncertainties, please see the sections titled Risk Factors, Forward-Looking Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the impending updates to these sections in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Second, this call will involve a discussion of adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, which under SEC Regulation G, we are required to reconcile with GAAP. Reconciliation of this measure to the closest GAAP financial measure is included in today’s earnings press release, which is available at douglasdynamics.com. Joining me on the call today is Jim Janik, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Jim will begin by providing an overview of our performance. Then I will review our financial results before turning it back to Jim to discuss our outlook. After that, we’ll open the call for your questions. Jim?

Thanks, Bob and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us. We closed the year with solid results especially given that the winter hasn't been very cooperative in our core markets for the second consecutive year. Our fourth quarter results were driven by the addition of the Work Truck Solution segment in July and continued strong performance at Henderson which was partially offset by lower sales Work Truck Attachment segment as we expected. For the fourth quarter net sales were approximately $130 million, producing net income of approximately $10 million or $0.44 per diluted share. Following two successive years of record results, combined with very low snowfall coming out of the previous winter of 2015 and 2016, we didn't anticipate reporting record results for our commercial snow and ice products for third year in a row. The teams at WESTERN, FISHER and SNOWEX have done an admirable job working through the tough weather conditions and we are pleased with their performance under the circumstances. I'm also delighted to report that the Henderson team continued their strong track record of growth and produced another record performance for 2016. On a positive note, we continue to see pockets of dealer optimism about their 2017 prospects despite low snowfall in most parts of the country. We expect this winter to end with below average snowfall totals overall. If you want to look in more detail, snowfall was inconsistent both in location and in timing. For example, October and November were very warm and saw a little winter weather. December returned to strong snowfall in some of our core markets which resulted in average fourth quarter snowfall across North America. Overall as five of the six months of winter are over, while some markets in the Northeast saw only slightly below average snowfall, we…

Thanks, Jim. Before I began, I just want to remind everyone, that we created two reporting segments in the third quarter of 2016. First, the Work Truck Attachment segment, which includes our original business, focused on manufacturers, snow and ice and fleet [ph] equipment for both the municipal and commercial markets. And Second the Work Truck Solutions segment which resulted from the acquisition of Dejana and includes the up-fit of market leading attachments and storage solutions for our commercial work vehicles. Also as you will see in this press release, our results for the full year include the impact of the Work Truck Solution segment for the period of July 18, 2016 through December 31, 2016, following the completion of the deal. With that said let me walk you through the results. Overall the results were positive and in line with our expectations. For the fourth quarter of 2016 net sales were $130.1 million, representing a 9.5% increase over the same period last year. The increase reflects the addition of Work Truck Solutions and strong results from Henderson, which was partially offset by lower sales for our core commercial snow ice control products. As a reminder we are comparing fourth quarter 2016 to our all-time record performance in the fourth quarter of 2015. As we mentioned last quarter the Work Truck attachment segment shipments to the former Dejana operations were originally treated as an inter-company inventory transfer and revenue was deferred in the third quarter. Some of that revenue was recognized in the fourth quarter as end-users were shipped products from the Work Truck Solutions segment and we expect this process to continue in Q1 of 2017. For the fourth quarter of 2016 corporate sales were $88.5 million or 68% of sales compared to $80.3 million or 68% of sales…

Thanks Bob. As we look into 2017, we feel positive about our business and our long term prospects for the future. For our commercial snow and ice control brands we continue to see positive non-snowfall indicators such as positive light trucks sales, low inventories and positive dealer sentiment, all bode well. However, while winter isn’t over yet, so far we have seen below average snowfall across North America again. The season started very late for the second year in a row. And we've experienced inconsistent and variable snowfall across our core markets. When viewed in aggregate across the past six months we do expect to see below average snowfall winter again, which will impact our pre-season period. In contrast backlog data and ongoing discussions with customers provide us good visibility with our Henderson brand that 2017 will see continued growth. However, unrelated to our operations we are experiencing a delay in receiving truck chassis from two OEMs, which of course is delaying our team from completing and delivering some trucks to customers. While we are seeing signs that this situation is rectifying itself during the calendar year we are likely to see more variability from quarter-to-quarter for Henderson products this year. Typically Henderson produces fairly consistent results across the four quarters, but for 2017 we expect revenue to skew towards the back half for the year. In addition, while we generally expect the Work Truck Solution segment to grow at a mid to high single-digit rate over the long term, we have seen some temporary softness in the first two months of the year related to dealer sales of Class 4 to Class 6 trucks and created our outlook with that in mind. Looking at 2017 as a whole we do expect to breakdown of our results between quarters to…

Thank you. [Operator Instruction] Our first question is from the line of Josh Chan of Baird. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning Jim and Bob, thanks for taking my question.

Sure, Josh

Hi, yes. So for the quarter I was wondering if in the attachments business you could give some color in terms of how accessories did relative to equipment in terms of that Attachment segment.

So let me make sure that I understand your question. How did parts and accessories do relative to the attachment segment?

Correct, yes, parts and accessories and then I guess versus the equipment within that segment?

Yes, so what’s interesting is in low snowfall period, service parts as well as equipment tend to work in unison. I would say that service parts and accessories was probably a little bit softer than we anticipated and that's entirely because the products overall in Q4. We’re not used quite as much as they normally would be. So they were a little bit softer.

Okay. Where they softer than the segment average I suppose?

I don’t know but I can answer that. It isn't obvious. I haven’t seen those numbers. But it wasn’t -- I guess the way say it is, it wasn’t surprising and it wouldn’t be unusual compared to what the weather situation was.

Okay, great. And then on the Henderson delay, what was the driver behind the delay shipment. It sounds like it’s not related to what you are doing but kind of -- what are you seeing in the beginning of the year here?

Sure, what we are seeing is there are two OEMs in particular I won't name them but they are having some production issues. One has got some design issues and the other one's just having capacity issues and what that's creating is sort of a lock jam in the industry for those vehicles and as a result we’re beginning to see that lock jam break a little bit but it is hampering our ability to complete our trucks and then get them shipped.

Okay.

But it’s again nothing that we’ve done. We are in close contact with them but this is something that is an issue for other people who do similar things in the Work Truck industry.

Right, got you. Okay. And then my last question is on the Attachment segment, it looks like you are able to improve margins for the year just by having revenue. So what was the driver behind the margin improvement there and how are you thinking about margin looking into next year as revenue probably comes down a bit too?

Yes, couple of things there, I think one of the thing that is one the hallmarks of our core business is that when snowfall is below average and we are not spending as much time making product to ship we double down on DDMS type improvements and 2016 was a significant cost reduction year for our core business. We also did enjoy for the first half of the year some nicely below average fuel cost. Those are ticked up in the last six months or so. But there was a positive impact there for a while but I would go back to just what that team does when they are in the low snowfall environment as we just double down on reducing cost and improving quality and positioning ourselves, so that when the snowfall comes back, we can produce and ship high quality product at even higher margins then we have the year before. And I would expect that team in the 2017 in a similar snowfall cycle to take a similar approach.

Okay, great. Good job on the year-end. And best of luck as far as next year.

Thanks Josh.

Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Jim Giannakouros of Oppenheimer. Your line is open.

Hi, Jim and Bob.

Good morning.

Good morning.

So, I think on core, we did some checks and we got mixed messages obviously mild winter was a parent second one in the row, trying to get a feel for what the preseason is going to look like for you guys. Certainly 1Q my sense is and please tell me your thoughts is that inventories are lean. So I think distributors manage inventory down to the extent that they could and that might actually help the preseason picture as opposed to what we would have thought maybe a down 15% 20% type of a preseason on core. Is that an offset we should be thinking about? And then also -- your comments, and our checks with your closest competitor that kind of intimated or suggested that things aren't that bad from what this past winter afforded them.

Yeah. I think from our perspective, you're right, there are some puts and takes. Inventory levels are low, but again equipment didn't get used a lot in the past winter. So as you think about our business as replacement cycle business, we're comfortable that there will be very good very decent replacement, but it won't necessarily be driven until we get into later in the year until we see what kind of sell-through comes through. I think in general December was a good month for everybody in the industry, because it was a nice month. I would say December was probably the only month people are talking about success this winter, they had pretty good success in December as we did. But once you combine that with October, November, January, February it's a significantly below average snowfall year. But December was a very good month for everybody.

Got it, okay. So if I can ask another way or more pointedly, embedded in your guidance how should we be thinking about what's in your plan or thoughts on the core specifically in 2017?

Yeah it's going to be certainly from our perspective it's a second soft snowfall year in a row. And I think what we're going to see as we're hopeful inventories are low but again we manage for average snowfall and then we adjust accordingly. So we're going to really have to wait and see what takes place. I think the only way I can really give you any guidance's is that it won't be the worst year we've ever had and it won't be the best year we've ever had it will be somewhere in between.

Okay. And since you have two segments now, I mean can you give us some ranges at least as to the per segment contribution in 2017 to your sales and EBITDA ranges that you've put out there on a consolidated basis?

I don't believe we're going to provide guidance for each of those segments Jim.

Okay all right. Thanks guys.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Steve Dyer of Craig-Hallum. Your line is open.

Thanks good morning guys thanks for taking my question. Within the -- you had mentioned starting to see a little bit of softness. Is that something you could I guess elaborate on is that sort of certain customers or certain segments or how should we think about that?

Yeah, they've got multiple end user segments. And what we've seen late fourth quarter into the first quarter is their dealer direct business where they up pick vehicles per truck dealers in the East Coast that is softened up retail inventory levels are higher ever than the dealer equipment we'd like them to be and they're slowly working through that. So that comment was specific to the truck dealer business that they do. The other segments of their end user customer base whether it's lease or it's leasing companies or it's van up that's -- orders are fairly robust there. There is a lot of activity when you get the new budgets approved for the calendar year. There is a lot of quoting that takes place in Q1 for the fleet and for the leasing companies. And we have a lot of good momentum there. So the one segment of their business has been soft for 90 days or so. We need to work through that. But have been said all that, we are still as thrilled with the near term and long-term growth prospects of this acquisition and we look forward to speaking with you about some pretty exciting things as the year unfolds.

Great, and I noticed, you did sort of higher EBITDA margins in the last couple of quarters with Dejana, than sort of the midpoint of this next year's range. I am just wondering if that’s conservative or more of there is something maybe not progressing there on an operational standpoint as well as maybe you had hoped?

I wouldn’t frame it that way. I would say that’s going back to the dealer update softness, that happens to be a higher margin profile in that segment of their business. So it's just a really a mix issue from that point of view. DDMS implementation there is progressing nicely. We highlighted last quarter the couple of things that are really cool going on there. So it's really just this dealer business softness that is impacting margins little bit in 2017.

Okay great. And then I guess lastly can you just remind us around seasonality of Dejana, just given that it’s been about a quarter and a half now, how should we think about that flow throughout the year?

It is, I would say it’s closer to 25, 25, 25, 25. But the first quarter is probably the low 20s, the fourth quarter is between 25 and 30 and then Q2 and Q3 kind of settled right in between those two. So it's much more predictable and much more stable, but stronger in the fourth quarter than it is in the first quarter.

Okay got it. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thanks Steve.

Thank you. Our next question is from Mike Shlisky of Seaport Global. Your line is open.

Good morning guys. Can you hear me okay.

Hey Mike.

All right, great. Just want to follow up on the last question, first of all, can you just give us a sense as to overall for the whole company what's the kind of go forward transition earnings. If you just kind of confirm that this year will not be the same as what you expect in other years for your earnings calendar?

Mike, I am sorry, but I had a difficult time hearing the question. Could you please repeat that again.

Sure, could you tell us what is the overall company more normalized calendar for earnings going forward, not just for Dejana but the overall company, sort of any first half, second half or kind of by the quarters, can you just confirm that this year will not be inline with that sort of long-term you have given what’s going in Dejana this quarter?

We haven’t and we’ll likely not give quarterly guidance in terms of how the total company financials breakdown by quarter. I think if it take, we just spoke about in the Work Truck Solution segments, if you add, Jim Janiks comment about Henderson having some truck availability issues, that’s going to push some of their business out of the first quarter and into the back half of the year. You’re going to see a little bit stronger back half of the year from Douglas than you normally would and likely a little softer first half of the year. I think that’s an appropriate signal for us to send at this point. I think when you look at our full year guidance, even given below average snow fall two years in a row we still got some pretty exciting things that are on the horizon in 2017.

Okay, that’s fine. I just want to ask about the [indiscernible] issue that you had mentioned earlier as well. Just a little more color there. The one OEM and there is having some design problems, is it that the designed is now work with your attachments or it's overall truck itself that's now your [indiscernible] this year, than the one -- sorry.

The issues are has nothing to do with compatibility with our product. It just did -- it’s in the Truck design itself and the performance of the truck portion of the vehicle, not in how it relates. This is frankly nothing to do with Douglas, this just has to do with Class 7 and Class 8 truck availability.

Okay, I am sorry, is it a model changeover problem or is it a product quality that they are having, do you think?

Well, again I don’t want to get into too much detail, but one of them few years ago cut back capacity so far because of the downturn that now as trucks are becoming much more popular again they are having a difficult time meeting the domestic growing demand which they’re working on. And the other one, the other manufacturer actually have some performance issues in their current vehicle and they've slowed production down until they fixed those problems.

Okay that’s fair. Just can you just also just give a little more color on your M&A outlook for the year? Obviously you are going to keep up pursuing targets as you always do but kind of give us a sense as to -- just update us as to whether you probably doing this outside of the weather related attachment area or you been doing it inside weather attachments and are there any areas that you don’t serve yet and - that which we should be thinking about?

Can you repeat your question one more time. It seemed like there were a couple of questions in there I want to make sure what the question was?

Sorry I’m in a very lot of convention [ph] right now. Just kind of curious can you just tell us about your M&A outlook are there any areas of weather related attachments that you don’t currently serve right now or are you looking for areas outside of the weather world for your next target for M&A?

Yeah we’ve talked about this before. We don’t have any specific time table for acquisitions. We tend to be more opportunistic and again from our perspective the strategic opportunities could and can exist in non-weather related businesses but there may be some opportunity that comes up in a weather related business that just fits us perfectly. So at this particular point what I will say for ’17 is we continue to look for really good opportunities but right now I think we’re incredibly focused on integrating two of the more recent opportunities so yes we’re looking but we’re also absolutely focused on integration.

Okay, thanks very much guys. I will leave it there.

All right, thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I’d like to turn the call back over to Mr. Jim Janik for any further remarks.

For all of you on the phone thank you for your interest in Douglas Dynamics. We look forward to speaking with you about our first quarter 2017 results in May. Thank you very much.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today’s conference. This does conclude today’s program and you may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.