Good morning, and welcome to the Planet Fitness Q4 2023 Earnings Conference Call. Please note that today's call is being recorded. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the call over to Stacey Caravella, VP Investor Relations. You may begin your conference.

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Speaking on today's call will be Interim Planet Fitness Chief Executive Officer, Craig Benson; and Chief Financial Officer, Tom Fitzgerald. Both will be available for questions during the Q&A session following the prepared remarks. Today's call is being webcast live and recorded for replay. Before I turn the call over to Craig, I'd like to remind everyone that the language on forward-looking statements included in our earnings release also applies to our comments made during this call. Our release can be found on our Investor website along with any reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures mentioned on the call with their corresponding GAAP measures. Now I'll turn the call over to Craig.

Thank you, Stacey, and thank you, everyone, for joining us for the Planet Fitness Q4 earnings call. Before I review our fourth quarter results, I want to take a moment to discuss the announcement we made today that Tom Fitzgerald, our CFO, has decided to retire at the end of August 2024. Since joining Planet Fitness four years ago, Tom has been a tremendous asset to our team, bringing 40 years of corporate finance and executive leadership experience to the business. Now I'm going to turn it over to Tom to discuss his decision.

Thanks, Craig. It's been a privilege to serve as CFO of Planet Fitness and work alongside such a dedicated and passionate team. I really can't think of a better way to end my career than working for a brand that does so well and also does so much good. After 40 years in business, I've made a decision to retire at the end of August 2024 and focus on some of my interest outside of work. I look forward to handing over the reins to new leadership that will guide Planet Fitness' next chapter. I am proud of the work we have done during my time at Planet Fitness to deliver value to our franchisees and our shareholders. I know that we have a lot more work to do. And over the next several months, I will be focused as I always have on our key strategic and financial objectives and on ensuring a smooth transition to new leadership. So with that, I'll turn the call back to Craig.

Thank you, Tom. Just two months into his role, the pandemic hit and all gyms closed temporarily, which presented an unexpected and once-in-a-lifetime challenge for a newly appointed CFO. Tom embraced this challenge head on with steadfast leadership. He dove in immediately and spent a considerable amount of time speaking with bankers, lenders, investors and franchisees, reassuring them that our strong balance sheet would get us through the depths of the crisis, even when all our gyms closed temporarily. We ultimately expanded our capital allocation strategy to include the acquisition of one of our largest and best-performing franchisees, which doubled our corporate store footprint overnight. During his time at Planet Fitness, Tom has also helped build a talented financial team that will ensure a smooth transition to the next chapter of the company's financial leadership. He's also been a great partner to me in my role as Interim CEO. On behalf of everybody at Planet Fitness, I would like to thank Tom for his many contributions to our company. And now let me turn to the CEO search. The CEO search remains a top priority for the Board and the search committee. After considering several dozen candidates and having interviewed 13 very qualified finalists, the search committee will be sending a shortlist to meet with the whole board. We look forward to updating you when a final decision has been made. We expect to announce a new CEO prior to identifying our next CFO. Tom's commitment to remain through the summer will provide an extended transition period, allowing the new CEO to be involved in the CFO search process. Now to the results. We ended 2023 with 18.7 million members, system-wide same-store sales growth of 8.7%, primarily driven by new member growth, and a 19% adjusted EBITDA growth. Our system…

Thanks, Craig. We believe that we are operating from a position of solid financial and balance sheet strength as we continue to break down fitness barriers for first timers and casual gym goers. Today, I'm going to address four things: first, our entry into Spain; second, potential plans to refinance the tranche of our debt in 2024; third, our Q4 results; and lastly, our 2024 outlook. Starting with Spain, we believe we have an opportunity to build on the success we've had internationally to expand into Europe. Spain is an attractive market in which we believe we could have more than 300 Planet Fitness locations over time. In order to accelerate our presence, we plan to open and operate a small initial set of corporate-owned stores in the near term and expect to eventually refranchise them. This is an example of us using our balance sheet to drive growth at a faster pace in exciting new markets as we continue to position Planet Fitness for sustained growth and value creation. Importantly, we continue to believe in our asset-light, highly franchised model, and we reiterate our strategic intent to own approximately 10% of our fleet. Now to our debt. We have an approximately $600 million tranche of debt that comes due in September of 2025, which we anticipate refinancing in the middle of this year, subject to overall market conditions. Based on indicative pricing, we believe our weighted average interest rate would still be below 5% when we refinanced that tranche. Next, I'll cover our fourth quarter results. All of my comments regarding our quarter performance will be comparing Q4 2023 to Q4 of last year, unless otherwise noted. We opened 77 new stores compared to 58. We delivered same-store sales growth of 7.7% in the fourth quarter. Franchisee same-store sales…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Simeon Siegel with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Hi, everyone. Good morning and Tom, best of luck on the next chapter. It's a really great to get to know you, work with you. Wish you the best ahead.

Thank you, Simeon. Likewise.

All right. Could you guys elaborate a bit more on the lift to 5,000 from 4,000? Maybe speak to those – just those incremental 1,000, what are they? Are they any different than the prior? Is there a geographic difference? Does anything change with the economics, growth waterfall, expected numbers for gyms, et cetera? So any help there would be helpful. And then just giving the many moving pieces of corporate, any help on FY 2024 on next year's SG&A dollars? Thank you.

Yes. Thanks, Simeon. I'll take both, and Craig may add. So on the study that we did, as you'll recall, we went back in – used the firm that originally gave us the projections pre-IPO that was Buxton in the current firm we use Tango. And I think they both said to us using different words that they really love the project because we, in their words, almost have perfect information, right, unlike a restaurant or a retailer who doesn't really know where their customers live. We know where every single member lives and how far they drive, et cetera. So it's data unlike they – what they typically deal with. So they feel really good about the results. Having said that, they're based on where the demographics are today. And so the 4,000 to 5,000 is basically the prototypical Planet Fitness that's 20,000 square feet, urban, suburban locations. It does not include small market infill or anything like that. So it's literally just penetrating the markets we are in based on what's happened since the IPO in terms of our own membership growth, the generational cohort trends that we've seen where the younger generations are joining at a more rapid rate, and we're 9% penetrated with millennials and Gen Zs. Geographically, the store opportunities are sort of based – almost mirror how we rolled the brand out across the country. So starting in the Northeast, we have much more density in terms of percent of population that belongs to the Planet. It gradually lessens as you go to the Southeast and even lower in the Southwest middle of the country and lowest in the West, where we went last. So the store count increases are reflective of that essentially. So it's really – we think it's really good news, not unexpected, frankly. And because it's a point in time, we think when we remeasure it, when the company remeasures it in a few years again, assuming the generational trends are – continue to move as they have been projected, it should be another positive story. But so we're really encouraged by it. The second part of your question is SG&A. It's reflected in our outlook. More broadly speaking, it incorporates all the actions we took care earlier and the priorities we're focusing on.

Great. Thanks a lot guys. Best of luck for the year.

Thank you, Simeon.

Your next question comes from Megan Alexander with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Thanks. One quick clarification. Tom, I think you said you expect system-wide same-store sales between 5% and 6%. The press release said high singles. So I just wanted to clarify that point first.

Oh, yes, it should be 5% to 6%.

Got it. Okay. Thank you. And then…

My apologies for that.

No worries, maybe in light of that, there has been a lot of data pointing to maybe some softer trends quarter-to-date. A lot of others have commented on some weather noise in January. Could you maybe comment at all on quarter-to-date membership trends versus your expectations and perhaps how the cadence has played out so far, January to February?

Yes. Megan, I'll take that one again. In keeping with what we've been doing here for the past several quarters, we're not going to comment on the current quarter. We'll certainly provide a lot of in-depth discussion on our next call. But what I would say is that our outlook includes what we're seeing to date and our best knowledge of how we see that growth unfolding over the rest of the year. So I get it's a big question. There is a lot of media attention to it. We just want to continue our practice of not commenting on the current quarter, but it is reflected in our outlook.

Okay. Understood. And then maybe as a follow-up, the placement outlook, 120 to 130, it is a bit below last year. Understand the changes you're making in the model aren't necessarily impacting development yet. But I was hoping maybe you could just talk through some of the other puts and takes that's driving the expectation for it to be lower than last year. And maybe in particular, how much the transition to the new cure period is impacting your outlook there?

Yes. This is Craig. Good morning. We certainly are vigilant about what we're looking at with this franchisee, new store development as well as all the different elements of remodeling and reequipping. And we've taken a fairly conservative outlook on where we go from this because it's taken quite a long time for the system to absorb the changes and what it means to their CapEx – but it's and needs and the interest rate [Technical Difficulty] on top of our changes on top of it have also added to the mix. But we're pretty confident that our franchisees are very aggressive and want to – as I've said before, want to grab as many good locations as is possible. Part of the challenge is also finding locations as we're in an all-time low for retail space. About 98% of retail space is accounted for, meaning it's being used. So that doesn't leave a lot of space left over to grab either. So that's a phenomenon that I guess has been going on for some time now, clearly COVID and beyond, but even perhaps before that. So that somebody who takes down as much retail space as we do has a bit harder time finding those locations that used to be more available.

Great. Thank you very much. Best of luck.

Thanks, Megan.

Your next question comes from John Heinbockel with Guggenheim. Please go ahead.

So guys, I want to start with, do you think given Gen Z and High School Passes as demographics change over time, does the business become a little less seasonal, right, January less important, 1Q, less important? And how does that kind of fit in with thoughts on promotional activity, right, the idea that maybe you can go everyday low price and not lean on $10 so much? What's your thought on that?

Hi, John, it's Tom. I'll start with that one. I think it's frankly too soon to tell whether or not the shift in our membership mix to be more GenZ and millennials, which are a little over 60% of our total membership base now, whether that causes a change in the seasonality of the business and the membership growth for our promotional strategy. Certainly, we haven't seen anything that would suggest that through 2023. Again, we're not commenting on 2024 yet and I think time will tell. But what we've seen and maybe heard anecdotally is the idea of New Year's resolutions and starting the new year with some new goals is not necessarily generationally based. It seems more universal. But again, I think time will tell.

And I think that the other thing that we have to understand is that we are fortunate our membership continues to decrease in age, not increase in age.

Right, yes.

As you mentioned, there's patterns to that. And then the last thing I'll mention, as we've talked about before, especially ICR, we have to do a better job branding this company than we have done in the past. And that will mean that some shift away from some of the promotional collateral we've had in the past and more towards a branded message that you haven't seen that yet, and we're still developing that, but that will come over time and I've also mentioned that younger people tend to want to align themselves with the brands they can relate to. So by offering a branding message, hopefully, we can get people to become more fans of Planet Fitness, stay longer at Planet Fitness and other things that can be attributed to having a strong brand, which we have, but we have not enunciated.

So Craig, since you hit on that, maybe a follow-up. When do you think we start to see that content, right? I don’t know that you necessarily want to wait until peak season next year. When do we see that – where would you like to see the split on national local, right, which today, I guess, is two and seven. And then is the plan still starting in April to relax the spending requirements, right, for the first two years on new clubs?

The answer to that question is yes, John.

Yes.

So that is out there. We are developing that content and we are in the early innings of that. And to be honest with that, I don’t know where it’s going to land time-wise, but we need to get it done as quickly as possible and hopefully have it so that when we start next year, we have branded content going over promotional content. So that’s sort of the plan, and we need to execute on that, as you know, because you’ve follow this company very closely. This company has a lot of good things that we do for people that we just don’t talk about and we need to be much better articulating that message in a clear and concise way. And doing that in conjunction with promotional pricing, I think, will be a real winning combination.

Okay, thank you.

Thanks, John.

Your next question comes from Jonathan Komp with Baird. Please go ahead.

Yes, hi. Good morning. Thank you. I just want to follow-up, you gave the comps guidance for the year 5% to 6% growth for the system. Can you just talk a little bit more? I know the typical target is high single digits. So what are you seeing or embedding in the expectations for comps below your typical plan for the year? And could you just talk more tactically given some of the signs of a softer start for the industry, do you have some specific plans or reactions in place to drive better performance going forward?

Yes, hi Jon, it’s Tom. So I think if you look at how our comps played out over 2023, they were still strong, but the fourth quarter was the lowest of the four and it sort of played out that way in the Q2 and Q3. So I think as you know, with our business, more and more stores are now mature, still growing. We talk about our original store in Dover here in New Hampshire still has positive same-store sales growth, mostly due to member growth. But the mature stores do grow slower and the impact of ramping stores in their first, second and third year has always been a big help to same-store sales. And that’s just from a composition of our fleet, is becoming a smaller percentage. Now as we’ve said, those new stores that we’re building here in late 2023 and – sorry, late 2022 and into 2023, have really tightened the gap to where those new store ramps were pre-COVID. So that’s really great to see. They are not all the way back there, but they are definitely very close. So that’s a good part. It’s just really the composition and the mix of new and ramping clubs compared to the mature store base. But in the grand scheme, we still feel very good about 5% to 6% and the flow-through of the model franchisees will still – and our own corporate clubs, should still have expanding EBITDA margins on a four-wall basis with those same-store sales.

And any thoughts on just tactical plans for 2024 here, things that you could do to drive member gains throughout the year?

Well, I think we’re – again, we’re not talking about 2024 in particular. But generally, we always assess what’s happening with each passing month, and working with our franchisees to coordinate our activity and what we think we need to maintain or tweak. The good news is we spend a lot of money, so we definitely are – we try to be as agile as possible in redirecting whether that’s channel shift or calendar shifts, channel meaning digital to broadcast. To Craig’s point about messaging, I think we’ll learn more through the year about how we mix the messaging. So, we still believe we spend almost the entirety of the marketing spend in the industry in the U.S. So, we’ve got a lot of firepower, we just will continue to try to optimize that as we progress across the year, just like we do in any year.

Okay, thanks Tom. And then just one follow-up, Craig, if I could just ask, you’ve been in the interim role now for five months here. Just could you give any more specific details on the time line here for the remaining process, maybe what stage you are in from some of the interviews and any characteristics of some of the candidates you’ve identified? Thanks, again.

Thank you for the question. So we – not we the Committee has interviewed several dozen candidates from a pool of over a 100, I believe and are now creating a short list that we should see somewhat shortly. So looking forward to seeing that short list and then perhaps talking to those people that build our needs and assessing where we go from there. But I think the process is starting to wind down and come to some completion.

Okay, thanks again.

Yes, thanks Jon.

Your next question comes from Max Rakhlenko with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Great, thanks a lot. So, can you share any takeaways thus far from the pricing pilots that you’ve got going on, just the impact that they have had on membership growth in elasticity, sort of what this churn look like there as well as the Black Card mix? Are the outcomes similar across the various pilots, or are you seeing variability there?

So, I’ll take the first portion of the question. So, we have three tests going, as you probably know, a $15 and a $12.99, which both started in the August-September time frame. We added to that a $14.99, which started in the December time frame that was in the New York DMA. Both of the other tests, the earlier tests, or a combination of DMAs of roughly 100 clubs that we’re doing it and 100 clubs that we model against those doing it, so we have a test group too. The results vary over time. And as you know, we also, in those two beginning tests allowed the clubs to, when we’re on sale for the Classic Card at $10, they would evolve that Classic Card pricing. That was not the case with the New York DMA, the later test, the $14.99, they did not offer that $10 membership opportunity since it started in mid-December. So, they have not followed the national sale model for that particular dollar offering. We’re still assessing where it is. Again, the biggest portion of this is how many people you can sign up, but just behind that is how long do they stay and that’s an iterative process that takes a while to understand. I will say that I think, and there’s no data behind this that it takes a while for the market to absorb pricing changes. And so there could be some anomalies associated with that. I need to look further to date to understand that better, if there is anything to it at all, but just bringing that up as a conversation piece. Tom, do you have anything else?

No. Yes, just one thing. Max, I think there has been a lot of – understandably, there has been a lot of media things written and said about our pricing test and what we did and most of it is actually inaccurate. And I think the principal statement we want to clarify is some folks have said that we were doing something in the first two weeks of January, and then we changed our price because of soft trends and all that. That just wasn’t the case. It’s a question of what media people see. So, if they’re watching national ads, they’re not seeing a price point in those ads for the reasons we’ve articulated. But then if they saw a local ad, all the local media does carry a price point. So, it’s just a question of what you saw when. But we did not change any messaging tactics or pricing through January as a result of anything that we saw.

And I’ll just add one thing. The lion’s share of the advertising in the first quarter is local spend, not national spend. So, we’re most likely seeing pricing in those local markets ads than we would be seeing national that have no pricing, ,right. The national ads have no pricing across the country, the local ads do have pricing.

Got it. Okay, that’s helpful. And then so when the franchisees signed the new ADAs in December, did that have any impact on the cadence of their opening pipelines for the years ahead? I am just curious, why is there as much ambiguity as it sounds like, or are you providing potentially temporarily greater flexibility on openings this year?

Well, what we’re doing is we’ve gone from grace periods to cure periods. The grace periods were sold somewhat ambiguous as far as when you need to cure it by. The cure period is less. But the cure period gives you six months from the date you’re supposed to deliver something to fix it. And so that does push a number of different obligations perhaps out of 2024 if you’re using it that way. But the cure period is a cure period and it needs to be cured in that period of time. So, there may be something there. But I’ll add the following. If I see a good location, this is me speaking for me, I am not going to pass on it, because I mentioned earlier, 98% of retail space is leased, you can’t find space anywhere easily anymore. And it’s become quite an exercise to try and find those good retail locations to be able to occupy and that’s in spite of some hard times for a few different brands. But as you know, we are one of the three biggest consumers of space in the retail industry. So, we need [indiscernible] to make it work and if it’s hard to find that does slow the ship down. In addition, what used to take six to nine months to develop a new club is now 12 to 14 months, so that pushes it as well. And so there is a lot of dynamics going on in the marketing of our clubs and the building of our clubs and what have you, and we’re having to adjust to some of that. But I think the cure periods will be very helpful, especially in the longer term to having tighter time lines to be able to develop boxes in different territories.

And Max, I would add one thing. We ask franchisees to opt in or opt out by the end of 2023 to the new plan. And as we’ve said, essentially all stores, but two one-store operators have – did not. And I would say that was full depth detail. We then had to follow-up with contracts and they have to work through it, and that’s going to take a couple of months to finalize all that. So, that’s more like ocean depth detail if that makes sense. So, what happened by the end of the year was just the beginning of it. We had to do some more work with the contracts that they’re now getting exposed to and to Craig’s point about the lead times. So, we feel really good about what we’ve done. The reception has been beyond what we expected. It’s just a matter of at all playing through, but it’s not an increased level of ambiguity. It’s not like we’re lessening, and it’s also true that most people were on or ahead of their schedule. So, they’re not – there is no makeup period here that they are sort of accelerating through. Hope that makes sense.

No, that’s great. And then just quick last one to Craig’s point on real estate. I guess, why shouldn’t we think that the real estate issue is only going to potentially get worse as time goes on? A lot of the growth retail is sort of in that same size box that you guys are looking for 98% of the real estate is accounted for as Craig said earlier. So I guess, how should we think about that ahead? And why would the headwind potentially ease at some point in the future?

Hi Max, I’ll start that one. So I think the combination – and you’ve seen all the stuff, whether it’s CBRE, JLL, all the folks are saying the same thing, I think CoStar. I think the building of new real estate was definitely at sort of record lows through 2020 through 2023, new strip centers, the stuff that’s available, we’re not really interested in. We don’t do a lot of malls unless they are getting blown up and created more to look like a lifestyle center. We also don’t do a lot of office stuff buildings. That’s just not – where there’s a lot of that available. So, it’s really what are we after now. So, we think as rates lower as demand continues to grow from folks like us and others, TJX and other people are looking for similar sites that will ultimately improve. It’s just going to take some time. And I would say the other part is the interest rates. As the interest rates lower, whether that’s four moves, three moves, whatever, but over the next couple of years, we anticipate lower interest rates. So, all that will be a tailwind. The other thing is there are some folks who are walking away from their boxes and some of those work for us and some of those don’t. We’ve talked about Bed Bath & Beyond. We’ve got some of those, so – in our Corporate segment, some of our franchisees do too. Rite Aid recently announcing some of those spaces work for us, parking fields have to be big enough, there is a lot of stuff to work through. But as some of that happens, that also help. It’s just we’re still taking down a lot of real estate, it’s just in a tightening environment. And we think law of supply and demand will ultimately recalibrate to maybe look like what it was pre-COVID. It’s just going to take some time. These are not – these are ocean liners sort of changes, not cigarette boat.

Got it. That’s very helpful. Thanks a lot.

Thanks, Max. Appreciate it.

And Max, I’d just add one more thing. So, 14 million square feet of space came in retail space last year, which was half what was the projected demand. So, it’s a problem that we need to work through, but I agree with Tom. Supply and demand usually works itself out once the market understands that there is a need that’s not being upheld.

Your next question comes from Rahul Krotthapalli with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Good morning guys. Thanks for taking my question. Craig, you laid out some breadcrumbs at ICR talking more about the smaller format stores being a real possibility and you talked a little more about it today. You said previously that this will address the current real estate constraints, increased convenience and touch the trade areas, which were not addressed before. Can you help us think through the format and then also give us a little more insight on this infill strategy and what this could be a potential addition to the TAM? And I have a follow-up.

Yes. Rahul, let’s – we are actively working on different format clubs. And Tom mentioned or maybe I did in the opening comments, for infill opportunities, but perhaps even more for smaller population areas that we, in the past couldn’t get into because we need a bigger population. And we are actively working with some of our franchisees to develop those clubs with them. We’re working right now with schemes to be able to do those clubs. And I am hopeful that we can add those as opportunities to our pipeline sooner rather than later. But we have to look at all opportunities. And again, this has nothing to do with the upsizing that we did the exercise for. That stands on its own those are the more traditional clubs that we did a survey on. But these would be new opportunities and the huddle we had with the franchisees in mid-October, I talked about Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. Beaver Dam, Wisconsin has 20,000 population and a 40-minute drive time, and we couldn’t go in there in the past. So, to find a way to be able to enter Beaver Dam, Wisconsin and make it successful for the franchisee that has that club is one of the goals I have to enable us to be in places we couldn’t be in the past.

That’s helpful. And the follow-up is on international and M&A. Previously, it was contemplated if M&A can be a potential consideration to enter new markets even in Europe, given your brand equity possibly even buying an established operator and reformatting stores to Planet Fitness brand, did you take this strategy further at all or have any conversations post 2020? And if not, can you also talk more on leveraging the brand equity to organically compete against low-cost providers like Basic-Fit, which I think has like almost 200 clubs in Spain today and also AltaFit. So, I am just curious on your thoughts there.

Yes, I will start that one, Rahul. So we have, as you can imagine, given our position in the industry, we’ve had in the U.S. and internationally, a whole bunch of brands come our way. As we’ve looked at it, what’s tricky about it is, pick your brand in Europe. If we buy it, we’re buying members who basically belong to gyms that are pretty aggressive in how they work out. They are definitely not our environment. Some of them have tire flipping areas, big weights, not a lot of cardio, a lot of strength, some even have boxing rings you’ve heard us talk about. So if we buy it, we’re buying the asset, we have to spend a fair amount of money to redo the box. If they have a pool, we got to take that out, there is a lot of dollars that get invested in that. So we’ve paid to buy the company. We’re paying to reformat the stores and we’re likely going to lose a lot of the members. There’s not – we’re essentially buying the box itself and then spending a lot of money. We just think – plus we have to then change the brand and all that. So, as we’ve looked at it, we’ve tried to make it work. We haven’t yet found a case where it makes sense. So instead, what we’re doing in Spain is we’re taking a fresh start, where we’re going to build some stores, get it going and then refranchise them. We think it’s an attractive market. We think while Basic-Fit and others have and AltaFit, we’re familiar with all these folks, they have a presence. They just don’t do what we do. And so just like the U.S. had a bunch of people who do what they do and then we came along and disrupted the industry, we still haven’t found anybody who does what we do and appeals to the first time casual gym goer getting people off the couch. And you’ve heard us talk about the penetration in the U.S. is among the highest. There is only one other small country that’s higher. So all these other countries have lower percent of the population participating, we think that’s because it’s intimidating and it’s expensive. And we break those barriers down. So we’re excited about it. We think Spain is a great opportunity. And our balance sheet allows us to put a little capital in play to accelerate where our presence would get to in a few years versus where a new franchisee would be able to get it to.

Thanks, Tom. That’s really helpful, and we’ll miss working with you by the end of this year.

Thank you. I am still around for a little while, so you haven’t got ridden of me, but I appreciate that.

Your next question comes from Joe Altobello with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Hey guys good morning. The first question on the member base, as it continues to get younger, are you guys seeing any difference in average lifetime value between your younger and older member cohorts given the lower Black Card penetration rates? I’m not sure how the cancel rates might differ.

Yes, I can start then and Craig may add. Joe, it’s still incredibly attractive for a Gen Z contract value for their membership. It is a little bit below where it is on average, only to your point, because when they’re younger, their Black Card mix tends to be lower. But you’ve heard us talk about as we look at the different ages within Gen Z, there are step function changes in their Black Card penetration as they age in. And once they get to their 20s, they look much more like the average of roughly 60% of them are Black Card members. So, we’ll take that trade all day long, because the contract value, even with a slightly lower Black Card mix is still many orders of magnitude above the cost of getting a new member.

Got it. Very helpful. And maybe just a follow-up, the 5% to 6% comp growth, and thanks for clarifying that, by the way, is the composition of that still expected to be roughly 75% to 80% member growth? And does it assume the $15 Classic Card pricing test becomes permanent this year’s?

Yes, that’s a good question, Joe. It is still predominantly member growth driven and it assumes the current pricing that we have in the country does not assume we roll any new price test nationally.

Okay, great. Thank you.

You bet.

Your next question comes from Sharon Zackfia with William Blair. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning.

Hi, Sharon.

I appreciate all the color on what’s going on. I am also interested at, though, in the partnership side of the equation, as you’ve expanded that. How pertinent have those partnerships been to getting new members or getting them to trade up to Black Card? And concurrently with that, have you explored any opportunities to kind of tap into what’s happening with GLP-1s and the need there to build muscle mass and it seems like as a convenient, low judgment club that you would be well poised to benefit if this does become a more prevalent trend.

Yes. Let me start with the last question. So, the weight loss drugs that are now available, clearly present an opportunity for us to teach people how to maintain their muscle mass and in fact, enhance their weight loss journey by being healthier about it, but also speeding it up because, as you know, exercise helps burn off calories, too. So, we see that as an opportunity. We have some plans in place to develop a few things to augment what we offer in a club to those type of people. It’s still not a big portion of the population. I believe there’s only four million prescriptions right now, but it’s clearly gaining a lot of momentum. I’d also say that traditional weight loss drugs are fairly expensive for our members. So I’d say, on an average basis, our membership perhaps is lower users of that because of the affordability factor. I’m sort of [indiscernible].

[Indiscernible]

The perks continues to be a nice add-on to what we offer, our members. And in some ways, we hope that over time, it’s an anchor for them to maintain their membership. We’ve seen small takedowns on that and small additions to those using it to keeping their memberships for a longer period of time than the average. I still think we’ve got a lot of work to do in that area to make it as complete as it possibly can be for the lifestyle needs of our members. In the past, we’ve used products, but I believe there is also services we could augment whether it’s insurance or mortgages or what have you that people use on an all-the-time basis versus a onetime purchase thing.

Craig, thank you.

Welcome.

Your final question comes from Alex Perry with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. And Tom, congrats on your retirement. I just wanted to ask a little bit more about Black Card penetration. So, what gets Black Card penetration going in a positive direction, or should we expect, given the Gen Z acquisition continued declines in Black Card penetration, do you think potentially narrowing the pricing gap between White Card and Black Card could help this?

Well, preliminarily, we’ve seen some movement in that direction, but again, tests are still somewhat new. The more you can narrow the price common sense as, the more the opportunity is there to trade people up. So that clearly helps, maybe. And we continue to experiment with pricing. It’s something that we will continue to do for a long time, because I think there’s opportunities to look at ways that we can value engineer the pricing so that members still feel they’re getting a great deal, but also allow us to move the margin equation, especially with some of the changes that have occurred in the industry with the supply costs or labor costs or what have you.

Perfect. That’s really helpful. And then my follow-up is just on international. Is Spain the only international market you – new international market you expect to enter this year? And then could you just – how many stores in Spain were you expecting to open this year? And then are you looking at other European markets? Thank you.

Hey Alex. We’re only talking about Spain at the moment. And I think we’re still on our path to now that we’ve bolstered that team a bit here over the last few months to increase our pace from one-ish a year to ultimately two to three a year. So we’re still in the early stages of ramping that up. We feel really good about Spain. It’s a great country to enter in Continental Europe. We believe over time that it could be a 300-plus store opportunity. I think time will tell. [Technical Difficulty] and we feel really good about it. We have set aside the capital to do a few stores this year as part of our plan, and we’re working on our way through to getting leases and building our pipeline. So time will tell exactly how many we opened this year versus next year, but we feel good about the progress that we’ve made in a short period of time. And I think as I mentioned earlier, coming in as the franchisor really just opens up more doors than a franchisee who might be starting off on their own. So we like how we’re approaching this. And it’s one thing to say we’re going to add one or two markets a year, but it’s a different thing, obviously, to say a Spain at 300-plus location potential [Technical Difficulty] New Zealand, which we’re happy to enter, but it’s just a much smaller opportunity. So, this is going to look and feel much more like Mexico and Canada size store potential wise, and we feel good at that. So, more to come on where else in the world down the road, but we are very excited about this one.

Perfect. That’s really helpful. Best of luck going forward.

Yes. Thank you, Alex.

This will conclude the question-and-answer session in our call. I will turn it back over to Craig Benson for closing remarks.

Well listen, we are very appreciative over your time this morning. We look forward to talking to you in the near future, and thank you for supporting Planet Fitness and helping us along our journey. Thanks, and have a great day.

This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.