Good morning. My name is Mariana, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Polaris Q4 and Full Year 2017 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker’s remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to Richard Edwards, Head of Investor Relations. You may begin your conference.

Thank you and good morning. And thank you for joining us for our 2017 fourth quarter and full year earnings conference call. A slide presentation is accessible at our website at www.polaris.com/irhome, which has additional information for this morning’s call. Today, you will be hearing prepared comments from Scott Wine, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Mike Speetzen, our Chief Financial Officer. During the call, we will be discussing various topics, including 2018 guidance, which should be considered forward-looking for the purposes of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from those projections in the forward-looking statements. You can refer to our 2016 10-K for a more detailed discussion of these risk and uncertainties. Throughout the presentation today, all references to fourth quarter and full year 2017 actual results and 2018 guidance are reported on an adjusted non-GAAP basis unless otherwise noted. Adjusted refers to GAAP results excluding TAP integration expenses, the impact associated with the Victory wind-down, restructuring and realignment costs, and the impact of the Tax Reform bill. We have provided a reconciliation of the adjusted non-GAAP to GAAP results, which has shown on slide three through slide five of this Presentation. Now, I’ll turn it over to our CEO, Scott Wine.

Thanks, Richard. Good morning and thank you for joining us. With the Super Bowl in town this week and Polaris employees and vehicle supporting many of the related activities around the city, I feel even more incline than usual to start this morning with the football analogy. To no one surprise the Patriots are back in the Super Bowl, as Bill Belichick and his talented coaching staff, and arguably the best quarter back of all time have turned that team into high performing dynasty. Well, there are no circumstances where I would compare myself with coach Bill Belichick, it is fair to say that Polaris and the Patriots share some important traits. The Patriots have a simple mantra, do your job, that stresses hard work and personal accountability at every level of the organization, values that are equally fundamental to our culture at Polaris. Similarly, and intensely competitive NFL environment that the Patriots seem to always find a way to win, which is the hallmark of our Polaris team, unlike the NFL there’s no trophy for first place in power sports. But much like a football dynasty we are building a company that is capable of winning the right way every day always. The Patriots are renowned for being great in the fourth quarter. Unfortunately, that’s where our analogy ends because we were not. Slower than anticipated ramp up of model year ‘18 vehicle production, subpar snow fall across much of North America and weaker than expected RZR demand, overall North American retail sales were below expectations. We were able to escalate shipments throughout the quarter, supporting sales and earnings that were in line with full year and quarterly projections. Just as they have done all year, Indian Motorcycles outperform the industry in the fourth quarter, with nearly 17% North…

Thanks, Scott, and good morning, everyone. I am going to spend some time walking through Q4 and full year 2017 performance in more detail, and then cover our 2018 guidance. Fourth quarter sales were up 18% on a GAAP basis and up 17% on an adjusted basis versus the prior year. Transamerican Auto Parts added $83 million of sales during the quarter, which more than offset the $25 million of lost revenue from the wind down of the Victory business. Organic sales, which adjust for TAP and Victory represented the majority of the growth for the quarter, including strong sales growth in ORV Wholegoods, Indian Motorcycles, Global Adjacent Markets, PG&A and International. Additionally, the company’s average selling prices increase for the quarter driven primarily by lower promotional costs incurred during the quarter as planned. Fourth quarter earnings per share on a GAAP basis was $0.49. Adjusted earnings per share was the $1.47 when adjusted for the wind down of Victory, TAP integration, restructuring and realignment costs and the write-down of deferred tax assets due to the passage of Tax Reform in December. Adjusted earnings per share was up 25% driven by increased volume, lower promotional spend and operating expense leverage. These items outweighed negative product mix, higher incentive compensation expense and increased commodity costs. For the full year 2017, sales were up 20% on a GAAP and adjusted basis versus the prior year. Transamerican Auto Parts added $685 million of sales for the full year 2017, which more than offset the $164 million of lost revenue from the wind down of Victory Motorcycles. Organic sales which adjust for TAP and Victory represented just under half of the growth for the year. All segments and regions delivered solid growth for the year on an adjusted basis and when excluding Victory from…

Thanks, Mike. In closing, I am pleased to be able to discuss the year ahead with the backdrop of an improving global economy. We expect moderate tailwinds for the overall power sports industry, with the Off-Road Vehicles segment outperforming a Motorcycle market that is still somewhat subdued, competition for customer should remain intense in 2018 with innovation and promotional spend driving the market as much as the economy. Within this challenging environment, Indian will continue to grow and gain market share and Off-Road Vehicles will improve with an outstanding RZR playbook and best-in-class RANGER and General utility vehicles. As Mike described, Tax Reform will have a significant direct impact on Polaris, but the potential benefit of having more money in the pockets of our customers is also encouraging. We will monitor and analyze consumer behavior in the coming months and adjust our plans once we understand whether this economic theory will actually translate into reality. I am impressed with the progress both in terms of capability and results of our safety and quality organization, but we still have more work to do with our regulators to resolve open issues and we anticipate progress and further announcements in the coming months. Being great at safety and quality is a prerequisite for consistent substantial productivity improvements, which we fully intend to realize. Our efforts will not be short-term or shortsighted and the work we kick off in 2018 will generate the high returns on invested capital that we are used to delivering. The Polaris team worked diligently last year to position us for a better future, making bold decisions and taking aggressive action. Count on us, every Polaris employee around the world to do our job and find a way to win in 2018. With that, I’ll turn it over to Mariana to open the line for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Joseph Spak with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Thanks. Good morning or good afternoon. I was wondering just if we could start with the revised mid-term outlook, maybe some of the underlying drivers of that 5% growth and then just a housekeeping on the 15% earnings growth, is that off of a – is, I guess, the tax benefit incorporated in that or is that sort of on an apples-to-apples basis?

Yeah. Well, Joe, the 5% sales growth is just, as I talked about in my remarks, the four foundational business units we have are all well-positioned for growth. And I think that is with -- the work the Off-Road Vehicle guys are doing with Motorcycle Adjacent Markets and PG&A Aftermarket. We feel really good about the growth prospects. The work we have to do is on productivity and margin expansion, and I think, as we looked at the plans, if you take what Ken has done with VIP to-date, we start to bring down the warranty cost to acceptable levels and then drive this major supply chain strategic sourcing initiative, we feel pretty good about being able to drive 15% earnings growth.

Okay. So, I guess…

And remember, I want to clarify this is five-year compound annual earnings growth. We are not saying we are going to hit it every single year because you know how the global economy can be. But if you look over the five-year period, we feel comfortable that 5% topline, 15% bottomline, CAGR is pretty respectable.

And Joe it does include the tax change, because we are baselining off of 2017. As Scott indicated, even though you’re looking at the CAGR through that period, it still suggests we have got to have earnings growth, it’s in that kind of mid-teens area even with the tax potential.

Yeah. So, I guess just maybe again to follow up on that, Scott. I mean, would you say the Polaris overall strategy is shifting a little bit more towards cost leadership versus maybe trying to differ -- not to say the innovation is going to stop but like -- but the future of the company is really much more on being able to deliver a more cost effective product to sort of get that margin higher?

No. I think what I said was what I meant. We expect to do both. We have been – we are significantly investing our research and development spend this year, a lot of our capital expenditures that are higher is for tooling, as Mike indicated. So we are investing heavily in both technology and innovation. That said, we believe that the future of this company has to be on that we are a highly efficient growth company. So we are not going to go after, what I will call profitless growth. We are going to require that all the growth we go after is capable of delivering the returns that we find acceptable and we probably that will make us more discipline going forward.

Yeah. Thank you.

Thanks. Yeah.

Thanks, Joe.

Next question?

Your next question comes from Craig Kennison with Baird. Your line is open.

Hey. Thanks for taking my question as well. Just wanted to follow up on the tax policy, like how you see investing that tax windfall when you think about the various constituencies that want to cut, whether it’s consumers, dealers, employees or shareholders, all of which -- all of whom would like some piece of that?

Yeah. I think a couple of things, Craig. I would point out that, when you look at the compensation philosophy of Polaris, a substantial portion of our employees, all the way down through the organization share and the profit of the company every year to the tune of this past year will be north of $80 million that we will put into the pockets of employees. In addition, we have an extensive employee stock ownership program, which is about the fifth largest shareholder in the company. So our employees have benefited directly from the increased valuation of the company as a result of the tax policy change in the implied earnings improvement and value in the stock. I would say from a capital deployment, I mean, I made the points at the end, what it does is, it gives us more cash to put back into the machine and if you look at 2018 we are going to be investing at a record level, whether it’s in engineering or it’s in the capital expenditures that we have in the business that are all oriented around how do we accelerate the growth in the company.

Great. Thank you.

Thanks.

Next question?

Your next question comes from Gerrick Johnson with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Hey. Good afternoon. So your Global Adjacent business, if you look at the topline, the last two years has been your best performing segment. Can you talk about the polydemic trends you are seeing across the Global Adjacencies? Thanks.

Yeah. Gerrick, Bob Mack and his team are really doing a nice job with each of those businesses. We did a little bit of restructuring with Jim last year, so we have consolidated that with Taylor-Dunn. But certainly we are seeing and especially with our Goupil business in Europe, the demand for our electric vehicle, the small inner-city delivery vehicles is quite strong and we are starting to see more of the ship for that here in the U.S. as well. So we feel like the trends are positive, the investments we’ve made in those businesses to make the vehicles better is positive and we have – we are playing more probably in autonomous activities with both the military and the Taylor-Dunn platform than anywhere else in the company. So not only is it delivering good topline performance but really good growth prospects from an innovation and technology perspective.

Thanks, Scott.

Your next question comes from Drew Lipke with Stephens. Your line is open.

Yeah. Good morning.

Hi, Drew.

If I could just touch on the 2018 guidance and the ORV outlook a little bit. Your oil and gas markets are improving. Your ag markets are stabilized. International remains strong. You have the potential benefits of Tax Reform that you’re not including in your guidance. But the ORV industry overall appears to be strong and your guidance points to kind of low to mid single-digit growth. You talked about holding market share flat. I am curious why you not expect to see a bigger pick up in the industry here in ‘18, given the tailwinds that we have going into the year?

Well, part of it Drew is simply the comparisons that you get and some of the people that have been growing the fastest in the industry are going to have much tougher compares, which means the required growth rates going forward are going to be more difficult to achieve from an industry perspective. We feel exceptionally good about our utility vehicle and ability to drive growth and our performance, but it’s going to be a battle on the RZR side, so we are not expecting too much growth for us there and we think the competition is going to have a more difficult time with harder compares. We would like -- as Mike said, we’d like to think that there was upside there, maybe because of Tax Reform or perhaps how well some of our new vehicles are received, but we are not willing to make that into our guidance at this point.

I think, Drew, along those lines, part of it with oil and ag, I mean, the point I’d make on ag is our ag markets were actually down in the fourth quarter slightly. Oil was up, but it was up kind of low single-digit. So we are watching those. We really haven’t seen anything that tells us that there has been a substantial shift in buying power – patterns. And then to Scott’s point on tax, I think, everybody still trying to figure out exactly how it’s going to manifest itself. We know that our consumer demographic is probably going to pick up $1,500, $2,000 in tax savings on average depending on which state they are in. But we are not sure if that’s going to come through in lower withholding or they are going to come back through a tax rebate that occurs in early 2019. So that’s why we steer clear of trying to be a little bit too optimistic there.

Okay. And then with the margin outlook being flat on that kind of low to mid single-digit sales growth, I mean, can you elaborate on the mix headwind that you’re seeing and how should we think about incremental margins in relation to the long-term guidance and the 15% net income growth you guys laid out? Thanks.

Yeah. I think, the mix is really within the Off-Road Vehicle business, specifically between RANGER and RZR and I essentially hinted at it in my script that we anticipate RANGER and GENERAL to continue to grow at a pretty healthy clip. So there is the margin differential, even though we still make quite a bit of money on RANGER and GENERAL, it just not anywhere near as much as what we make on the RZR platform. The other thing we are dealing with in that business, promotional cost and pricing are about a net push, commodity headwinds will continue to be a bit of pressure on us and so we are doing everything we can in terms of the VIP actions, as well as pulling the warranty down, but essentially it’s all a net push for 2018.

Thank you. Next question?

Your next question comes from Tim Conder with Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is open.

Thank you. Gentlemen you’ve touched a little on the RZR here, so again just to summarize your commentary there. It sounds like maybe you got a little bit of the factory authorized clearance, pulled forward some demand and then you’re anticipating already seen some increased competitive situations on RZR here over the years, is that sort of correct synopsis?

Yeah. That’s fair Craig. As you know we had that space to ourselves for many years and that was a fun place to be. What we are finding is that now that there’s a competitive and trend in the market, it is actually making us better. It’s making us better on how we interact with our dealers. It’s making us better how we do our product design. But that doesn’t mean as we get better that we are able to pivot over night. So it’s a very much a competitive battle there. What I will tell you is the opportunity for us is really on some of the newer product segments, because on the head-to-head basis we are doing extremely well on shares. So we just need to make sure that as we introduce new product, it’s got the right opportunity to make sure we are competing across the Board and not allowing people as we used to do to have a space in the market or segment in the market to themselves. I very, very optimistic on what Chris Musso and Craig Scanlon, you couldn’t have two guys that understand not in the Off-Road Vehicle market but really the RZR segment more than they do. So I don’t expect us to be bashful about how we compete, but also don’t expect us in our guidance to think that we are going to be able to all the sudden start to outperform until we get our full spectrum of new vehicles in the market.

Okay. And then, Harley, on their call earlier talked about the Australian market as a whole being challenged in Q4 from the Motorcycle perspective. Can you just talk about Australia broadly and then to the $200 million savings that you guys are looking at on supply chain. How do you expect that sort of timeline over the five years to be skewed, I mean, $200 million sounds like the CAGR and Scott you alluded to earlier that, hey, it’s a CAGR on your net income growth and revenue growth. But how do you see that $200 million in particular on the supply chain sort of ramping?

Right. I will let Mike take the $200 million question. But I will tell you that, Australia was a record. Mike Dougherty and his International team did well everywhere, but specifically well in Australia. The transition there from ATVs to RANGERS, it was quite good for us. Indian Motorcycles continues to do well there. So not sure what happening for other people, but Australia was really good for us.

Yeah. Tim, on a couple $100 million from a supply chain standpoint, as Scott indicated, we have got some external help that we are ramping up through the course of 2018. There will be a little bit of benefit as we get towards the backend, but we are really going to start to gain momentum in 2019 and 2020 is when we will be through enough of the successive waves that we will be able to start really building enough volume and pace behind the savings that we will be driving. So that’s a bit of why we are not seeing as much margin improvement in 2018 as we would like and we are obviously going to see if we can push to do things faster, but as you can imagine it’s a pretty extensive project and at this point we want to make sure we are being diligent in doing the right way.

Okay. Thank you, gentlemen.

Thanks, Tim.

Thanks.

Next question?

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from Michael Swartz with SunTrust. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning, everyone.

Good morning.

Maybe, Scott, you could help us understand, I think you talked about retail – North America retail was a little softer than you had expected and down 1%, I think you’re coming off of up 13% in the third quarter. I guess I am just trying to better understand how much of that deceleration is maybe due to the some of the factory clearance program or initiative you have in the third quarter and how much of that has to do with, I think, you talked about some production delays during the fourth quarter?

Yeah. I mean, I definitely do not want to start making excuses for our fourth quarter retail performance. But I guess since you asked the question, I will start provide a little bit of context to it. Yeah, certainly, the 13% growth in the third quarter pulled a little bit in. But we were positive on ORV retail for the quarter until the 29th day of December. I mean really it was the timing of the last couple of days where we didn’t get the year-over-year push, so otherwise ORV would have been positive, but for that last little bit maybe we weren’t as clinical as we should have been in forecasting recognizing that the end of the quarter was going to be on a holiday more so than normal. So that certainly didn’t help. The fires in California weren’t helpful. The price change, I mean, we were decidedly lower in promotional cost across the RZR platform and we talked about that at the Dealer Show and we actually executed that and I will tell you that the first month of that was not ideal. We had to work with our dealers and train them, and as I said in my remarks that got better throughout the quarter and give us confidence as we exited the year that it was the right thing to do and we will be fine. We are executing with lower promo, which is what we have to do going forward. So that contributed as well and as you – as we indicated you followed up, we did not ramp up production of RZRs or RANGERS, especially the XP 1000 to the -- as efficiently as we wanted to. And again, this is all part of our quality initiative to make sure that we are handling everything right, so we are catching more things and it slowing us down a little bit. But that ramped up later in the quarter just not fast enough to catch up with retail for about RZRs and RANGERS. But, again, had we shipped RANGERS on schedule throughout the quarter, we would have been positive for the year -- for the quarter.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

That’s a hell of a lot of excuses, but that’s kind of what happened.

Your next question comes from David MacGregor with Longbow Research. Your line is open.

Yeah. Thanks for taking the question. I guess a couple quick ones, just within the five-year plan, what are you assuming for gross margins, just kind of the destination level? And then on the Indian 70% retail that’s kind of in step where you were last quarter, I think, plus 16, can you just parse that down for us and give us a sense of the composition of that growth, how much was maybe from new dealers or new products or anyway you can sort of help us understand, it’s impressive number but we trying to just find up the make up on it?

Yeah. So David, this is Mike. The five-year plan, we’ve been pretty consistent talking about the gross margins getting back to the historical highs, which is just under, call it, just around 30% and so as you model that out, you’ll see that that’s consistent and it means we have got to drive operating expenses down as a percent of sales. We won’t necessarily get down where we were historically. TAP brings in a structurally higher business with the retail footprint, but you will see improvement from where we are today. Is it relates to Indian? We stopped giving insight on the number of retail stores and the increase, but what I would tell you is, we really haven’t seen a substantial change in the number of retail stores, so it’s all been same-store sales increase, as we have talked about on prior calls, we are really committed to making sure that our dealers make money and adding more stores to the footprint could certainly drive some incremental retail, but it would somewhat be at the detriment of the existing store footprint, so we want to make sure that those retailers are doing well. And I think it’s indicative of the strong product and brand that we have in Indian in terms of being able to continue to grow in the market that’s been pretty challenged.

Thanks.

Yeah.

Your next question comes from James Hardiman with Wedbush Securities. Your line is open.

Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my call.

Yeah.

I wanted to make sure we are sort of putting the model year ‘18 availability issues that you had in the fourth quarter in proper context, I guess, particularly with RANGER 1000, it seems like there is a lot of demand for that product? What exactly is going on there? Is it a safety issue? Is it the supply chain issue? Is it the manufacturing issue? And I guess, Scott, you made a comment and I don’t even know if it was connected to this that you’re going to be working with your regulators with open quality issues and that we might expect some progress and announcement in coming months. I guess, what were you talking about there was related to the availability issues in the fourth quarter and ultimately what exactly is going on there?

Right. Well, those two statements are not related at all. We’ve had – I will address the later one first. As you know, we’ve had a series of recalls over the past two years and there is a lot of activity going on around RZRs, and obviously, our goal is to take all of the lessons learned and all of the improvements we’ve made and close that chapter of our engagement with them. And what I am talking about is our ability to do that, to make sure that that we are very comfortable with what the product pictures have been and what else needs to be done and the regulators is comfortable with that and move beyond this. That is not within the purview of Polaris solely to determine. It requires us and a regulator coming to agreement and that’s what we are working to do right now. I would suspect that we can do that. It’s a productive relationship and I think it’s a data driven approach and we -- as I said, I – in the next couple months we should be able to do that, that’s what relates to the my comment on the regulators. On the quality side, we’ve been very forthcoming that we put significant resources and people and advancements and processes to enhance our quality system. We did that faster than we could put all the improvements into our design and our supplier development activities. So that means that sometimes we are going to catch things that we don’t want to get in the field that we might not have caught in the past. In the fourth quarter with RANGER 1000, it was actually a four-wheel drive component that that wasn’t up to our quality standard and so we chose rather than take any risk for our customers that we would hold shipment until that product could be verified to be as good as it needed to be for our customers, that worked through and now we are ramping up and we are on good production schedule. But, certainly, we were -- our days of supply and our days to sale for the RANGER 1000 are far below where we would have like them to be in fourth quarter.

Very helpful. And then, maybe a second question here, so we have talked a lot over the last year or so, more than year I suppose about the $500 million of growth savings, $100 million on an annual basis. Maybe help us connect the dots between that and sort of what’s assumed not only for ‘18, but the next five years, it seems like a fairly small portion of that is actually hitting the bottomline or flowing through to the bottomline. I think you have done a pretty good job of explaining why that’s the case in ‘18. But maybe help us think about why beyond ‘18 you are not seeing more of a flow through from that $100 million?

Yeah. James, I think, there is a couple different things that are playing out. I think, one, the last couple years have been challenge for us from a promotional standpoint. Certainly as we start talking about gross profit improvement plans, we were in a very different market environment and so that has weighed on margins. I think if you look at ‘18 we are starting to see that become a net neutral and obviously we can work to make that a pickup we will. So I think you see that’s starting to abate. I think the other is, obviously, when we start talking about 500 basis points we were in a very different world from a warranty standpoint. We finished last year -- if you exclude TAP, we finished last year at about 3% of our revenue being in warranty expense. That’s down from what we had in ‘16, which was just over 4% and we anticipate that will continue to improve in ‘18. But as you start thinking about beyond ‘18, think about that warranty percent of sales going down to at least where we were historically, if not better as we continue to drive the quality enhancements. And then the last part is and it’s connected to the earlier comment around the industry. We build Huntsville right as the market slowed and so part of this is building the momentum into that factory footprint, so that we can build manufacturing leverage. We are obviously getting more of that in 2018, but I think as you think about the Off-Road Vehicle business even growing at low single-digit into ‘19 and beyond, that’s going to continue to give us better incremental margins.

Hey, James, thanks.

All right. Thanks guys.

Thanks, James.

Next question?

Your next question comes from Robin Farley with UBS. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks. I wonder if you could give any color with the long-term guidance, whether that includes any acquisitions or is that all from organic growth. I feel like maybe your previous long-term targets had kind of included assumption of some kind about acquisition side. I don’t know if that’s still in your long-term guidance? And I was going to ask about also the margin, I know it’s been asked in a couple ways. I guess, is it fair to say that when you’re looking for that margin improvement in your long-term guidance that you’re assuming that there will be enough cost saves to more than offset kind of product mix headwinds and things like – in other word you are factoring product mix and other headwinds still continue, but the cost saves, I guess, will start to come through more clearly or something after ‘18, so those are my questions? Thanks.

Yeah. Thanks, Robin. On the M&A front, you’re right the previous guidance did include the fact that we expect to get a couple billion dollars over the time period in M&A activity. So we are not factoring that, and although, there – it’s fair to say there might be a couple of tuck-in small acquisitions that would be part of the revenue growth, but we don’t need it, we believe organically we can get there. On the margin side, I am going to let Mike answer the question, but – I mean, I wish we can take a snapshot of the drawing that Ken has on his board in his office walking through all the various things that have to happen for margin to fall through. I mean this is not an exercise where we expect to work really hard and tread water on margin, it’s got to fall through to the bottomline and Mike and Ken have really got a good program to do that.

Yeah. And I think along those lines, Robin, we certainly taken into account what we think is happening in terms of the growth, with Motorcycles growing faster than Off-Road Vehicles through that long-term planning horizon. And as Scott alluded to, we’ve made some improvements over the past year and a half from a Motorcycle standpoint. We’ve increased PG&A and made some investments in terms of accessories and things like that. The next wave is a little bit more complicated and has to go in more deeply in terms of the design of the Motorcycles and we’ve been in the watch mode with that business and so as we progress and mature here over the next couple years, we will have more opportunity to really build that in. I think you’ll see that coming through even in 2018. Our Motorcycle margins will continue to improve, but we still got a ways to go relative to getting to the goal of being a company average. But I think 2019, 2020 are going to be pretty big steps. Some of that will leverage off for the supply chain transformation project, but there will be more extensive work that the Motorcycle guys and Ken are working through the plans on right now.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

Thanks.

Your next question comes from Scott Stember with C.L. King. Your line is open.

Good morning, guys.

Hi, Scott.

Good morning.

For the 2018 guidance, could you just tell us how much wiggle room there is in the event that you guys do have to get a little bit more aggressive than you probably wanted to be from a promotional standpoint, notably on the Off-Road Vehicle side?

Well, I mean, I think, part of that Scott is why we give a range from a 3 to 5 or with Off-Road Vehicles low to mid-single digits. It’s tough to quantify. I think I would come at it from a different angle. I think the work that the Craig and the team have done to make sure that we have got programs that work for the products and for the regions, and we’ve seen that, we have tested it, we are pretty confident that that’s going to work for us as we go forward.

And as you heard us say there is a lot of work that we are doing with our dealers to improve their velocity and their own profitability. Part of our research has shown that our promotion efforts and programs are exceptionally good even when we are not spending the most money. So we will continue to test that and validate that, but as Mike said, we are really pleased with the work that Craig and Chris and the team have done to make sure that we are getting maximum benefit and most efficient, and quite honestly there’s probably time for some price discipline in this industry and maybe we can be leaders in that.

Got it. Just one follow-up question on, Mike, you said for the first quarter the guidance, I guess, you would expect growth on the EPS side, I guess, half of that 24% to 28%, which was suggested low double-digit growth to mid-teen growth. But again if you adjust for the tax rate that really doesn’t suggest that there’s a lot of core growth year-over-year, is there something else going on from a cost perspective to look out for the first quarter or is there anything else going on?

No. I mean, I think, there are couple things. One, it’s predominantly an ORV quarter and as we indicated, we think margins are flat year-over-year in that segment. And then the second component is really around engineering, as I indicated in my prepared comments, we’ve been ramping engineering, we ramped it north of 20% this past year and we are going to be up another 10%. And so the first quarter engineering versus first quarter 2017 is going to be up substantially and so that’s going to way on any incremental volume that we are pulling through, so that to your point you get half of the desired full year EPS growth even with the tax factored in.

Got it. That’s all I have. Thanks guys.

Thanks, Scott.

Your next question comes from Jaime Katz with Morningstar. Your line is open.

Hey. Good morning, guys.

Hi, Jaime.

I have a question CapEx, you guys had mentioned that it would be significantly higher in the following year – in the upcoming year. So does that put it back to the 4.5% to 5% of sales that it averaged over the last couple years before 2017 and will it remain sort of inflated as you invest in the business?

Yeah. So, Jamie, it’s – it will be right around 5% of sales in 2018. I think it’s tough, as we look forward, I mean, there’s really two big discrete investments that we have in here, obviously, with the ramp we have had in engineering. There’s a lot of tooling that goes with that and so 2018 is really seeing the impact of that tooling ramp. And the other is this West Coast multi-brand distribution center for our PG&A and Aftermarket business, as we look into 2019, a couple of those things probably don’t repeat at that level, so it probably come back down, but I would suspect we are still going to be in that call it roughly 4%, 4.5% range.

Okay. And then on the acquisition front, is there anything that, obviously, you can’t talk about what you’re looking at, but do you feel comfortable with the spaces that you’ve been in there, there might be more opportunity there or would you be looking maybe to alternative adjacencies ahead to sort of expand portfolio?

Jaime, we have been really clear and I think consistent in the fact that we don’t have an acquisition strategy we have a corporate strategy that will augment with acquisitions. And right now it is the four business units that we have that we are really comfortable in. Bob Mack and his team in corp dev are doing a really good job of looking at opportunities, but there’s plenty of growth both organically and with M&A if we choose to in our four business units, we are not looking at getting outside of that.

Thank you.

Next question?

Your next question comes from David Beckel with Bernstein Research. Your line is open.

Hey. Thanks. Thanks a lot for squeezing me in. I want to circle back on the question that James had asked about the savings and I was hoping you could help comport the $200 million comment with prior comments from, I know, the Investor Day last year about $100 million savings over the next five years. Does the new comment supersede the prior and are you similarly now continuing to expect about half of that to flow through to the bottomline?

Yeah. So very good question, the work that that Ken and his team and across the business we are doing with value improvement is not stopping and we are not lowering our projections about savings opportunity. What we are seeing is that sometimes with product mix and with warranty costs and with commodity cost that that’s getting eaten up more than we expected it to. The sourcing initiative is 100% additive to anything we have talked about from a benefit perspective. It doesn’t mean that it’s going to all now suddenly flow through to the bottomline, but we really have found and this is a well-respected many, many cycles of learning partner that we are working with here and over the course of several years, because it does take that long to go through our entire spend and it’s a very thoughtful methodical process, we expect to get substantial savings, as we said ramping up above $200 million by the out years, that’s on an annual basis, that we expect to fully fall through and what Ken is doing with VIP will kind of be the stuff that we will have to manage the headwinds with.

Great. That’s super helpful. I appreciate that. And I thought to throw a sort of strategic call in here at the end, but I was – question rather, I was wondering given Harley’s announcement that it will be accelerating its electric bike your prowess in electric and then also obviously your Indian presence. Is that something you’ve looked into a viable sort of electric bike market in the U.S.? Is that something you’ve invested in or you think is a strong potential market for the industry as a whole?

We have very relevant experience in that market with our relationship with Brammo over the years. We have done a lot of really cool things ourselves in building concept bikes and whatnot. The strategic challenge and it really applies to automotive, as well as how do hell you make money in this business. And to the extent that there is an opportunity to drive profitable growth and corporate productivity with electric vehicles, we will be all in. We don’t see that in the short-term.

Got it. Thank you.

Thanks. We have got about four or more questions in the queue so we are going to try to get through those and then we will wrap it up. So next question?

Your next question comes from Greg Badishkanian with City. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks. So if you were to look at your distribute -- retail inventory levels now. Are you comfortable with those and how much more you have to build up to get to a more normalized sort of retail sales level?

I think from Off-Road Vehicle standpoint, Greg, I think, we are comfortable, there is always pockets where we maybe a little bit higher or a little bit lower than we would desire to be and that was really back to some of the comments in terms of why our shipments outpace retail in the fourth quarter, we were trying to recharge the channel after a very successful Q3. I think it goes without saying that Snow is beyond our comfort level and part of the margin impact in the fourth quarter was we put more promotional funds away to help us move those Snowmobiles here as we wrap up the snow season over the next month into February. And so, I think, that’s where we have got the big focus. Motorcycles, we feel good. It pretty much increased in line with what the retail sales growth and the RFM process is working very well there. So we feel good about the levels that those dealers are carrying.

Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Greg.

Next question?

Your next question comes from Joe Altobello with Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hey guys. Good morning, actually afternoon here.

Hi, Joe.

Thanks for squeezing me in. I guess, I just had one question on the North America retail number. I know it’s moved around by a few different factors, you had Snow this quarter and RZR availability was fairly limitedly at least early in the quarter. But if you look at what happened in the quarter versus 3Q, you guys pull back on promo and Off-Road Vehicle, the FAC ended and you saw a pretty dramatic slowdown in North America retail. So what does that say about your customer in terms of how savvy and how more aggressive they are in terms of seeking out and purchasing vehicles during those promotion times and what does that say for the overall potential promotion level of the industry going forward?

Joe, I hate to ask you to do this, but if you go back into my prepared remarks and what I said when I answered the question earlier, I think, I nailed all of this stuff. I mean, there was a lot of moving pieces in the quarter. As the quarter played out our pricing strategy which was lower prices, lower promo in RZR started to take hold and we have done a lot of work around the country to make sure that that’s working. I think if you want to draw a direct correlation between lower promo and that the fact that ORV turned negative it’s -- it was a contributing factor but by no means is it a trend that you should expect to extrapolate.

Okay.

Joe, I would add there – Joe, the one thing I would add to Scott’s comment and its evidence with our RANGER and GENERAL business. New products went and so even though we pull back from a promo standpoint, as we indicated the fourth quarter we saw a continued retail growth in those segments and so I think that proves that if you get the right product and new product in the market that have the level of success that we have seen with that one, you can drive the growth even with your promo spend being down.

Okay. So it’s a coincidence and you guys are convinced that it was really more the other factors?

Yes. Absolutely.

Okay. All right. Thank you, guys.

Yeah.

Thanks, Joe.

Thanks.

Next question?

Your next question comes from Eric Wold with B. Riley FBR. Your line is open.

Thank you. Kind of two follow up questions to a bunch that had been answered or asked already. I guess, one on the goal of the $200 million cut in goods cost over the coming year. I guess, is the – when does the assumption that that $200 million is met within kind of the five-year target and then kind of how much of that improvement is driving the 15% earnings compound annual growth rate. So if you get zero on say $200 million kind of what would that percentage be to kind of get a level of magnitude?

Well, as Scott indicated earlier, $200 million falls into the existing set of goals that that we’ve had and if you do the math, I mean, we finish this past year call it 25.9%, 26% gross profit and we have got a target of getting ourselves up right around 30% and there will be some level of expense leveraging from an operating standpoint. So I think that will give you a pretty good sense. Not all of the $300 million to $500 million of savings drops to the bottomline. We’ve obviously going to continue to invest in the business and spend money to generate the returns, but we anticipate as we gain momentum exiting 2018 that we will see a substantial portion drop into the bottomline, which will give us the ability to leverage the margin up close to 30%.

Okay. And secondly, you obviously expect promotional expend to be lower this year versus last year. Can you give us some color on kind of the expected reduction kind of year-over-year, is this something that you kind of address dynamically throughout the year as kind of sales progress or is something you kind of would reevaluate midway through the year kind of to impact the second half of the year?

Yeah. I mean, we – I try and steer clear of giving you the pieces, because the reality is, the promo spend that we deduct against revenue is down in ‘18 versus ‘17, but as I indicated in my prepared remarks, some of that is offsetting price reduction we made in Off-Road Vehicle, not all of it, but it’s somewhat offsets. And then to your point, we will modulate the promotional spend as we go through the year. That doesn’t mean we necessarily have to spend more, but we will redirect it when we see certain programs working and other programs not, and that’s where Craig and Chris and the Off-Road Vehicle team have demonstrated a pretty substantial strength in terms of being able to react quickly to stimulate demand or react to changing dynamics in the marketplace.

Perfect. Thanks, guys.

Thanks.

Yes.

Next question?

Your next question comes from Seth Woolf with Northcoast Research. Your line is open.

Hey. Thanks. Thanks for sneaking me at the end guys. Just two really quick questions. Mike, I know you talked about how the combination of price and promotion, which should be a neutral element to the gross margin in 2018. But I was just wondering is there anything, any call you can share with us about what you have backed in because you’ve got a competitor that’s bringing 30% more capacity to the market next month and it would seem in a market where you’re getting low to mid single-digit growth that would -- it would create environment that could become more promotional? And then, just Scott quickly it seems like NAFTA is in the news and a lot of the capacity industry-wide is in Mexico and the recreational market, I – is there anything you could – nothing you can share about what’s going to happen but how – what would your strategy be if something were to occur that made it prohibitively expensive to build the RZRs in Mexico? Thank you.

Well, I have talked to enough people in the administration to know that they are anything but stupid and if you think about a drastic change to NAFTA, NAFTA and what that would mean for the automotive industry and in many, many others. I think our little RZR problem is small in comparison. So we are not putting a lot of thought into it. We will deal with it. In fact we believe even if it was implemented as they talked about it would be manageable for us. But the thought of we could move most of the production to Huntsville, but that is not in our considerations that we are made no contingency plans to deal with that.

And I think, Seth, along those lines, our content in region that they measure it as RVC. We are above the current NAFTA requirements and we know that they’re talking about raising those requirements, but the question becomes, are they going to start to include things like engineering and IP, so we feel very comfortable that we will be able to react and if it means we have got to make some modifications to suppliers and things like that, the supply chain team is staying very close to it. Ken’s got a team who is monitoring this thing literally by the hour. So we think we can react to it and we don’t anticipate there is going to be some substantial shift in our business. Is it relates to the promo? I wish I could give you more, I worry that if I start trying to go down into, hey, the unit promo is down x. It’s not going to be overly helpful. What I would say is that, our promo is still a very large number and so we feel confident that within that pocket we should be able to use that money effectively to react. And quite frankly, at the end of the day it comes even though there’s capacity in the marketplace from the competitor it’s going to come down to how strong our product is against theirs and so we’ll see how things go as we go into 2018, but we feel very confident.

Okay. Thanks guys.

Thanks, Seth.

All right. I want to thank everyone again for participating in this morning’s call and we look forward to talking to you again in April if not before. Thanks again and good-bye.

This concludes today’s conference call. You may now disconnect.