Good morning, my name is Melissa and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Polaris Q1 2016 earnings conference call. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Richard Edwards, Head of Investor Relations. You may begin your conference.

Thank you, Melissa and good morning, everyone. And thank you for joining us for our 2016 first quarter earnings conference call. A slide presentation is accessible at our website at www.polaris.com/irhome which has additional information for this morning's call. Today you will be hearing prepared comments from Scott Wine, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Bennett Morgan, our President and Chief Operating Officer; Ken Pucel, our Executive Vice President of Operations, Engineering and Lean; and Mike Speetzen, our Chief Financial Officer. During the call today, we will be discussing certain topics including product demand and shipments, sales and margin trends, income and profitability levels and other matters, including more specific guidance on our expectations for 2016 which should be considered forward-looking for the purposes of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from those projections in the forward-looking statements. You can refer back to our 2015 10-K for a more detailed discussion of these risks and uncertainties. Now will turn it over to our CEO, Scott Wine. Scott?

Thanks, Richard. Good morning and thank you for joining us. When our business or our vehicles fail to perform to our high standards, our leading concern is to figure out what went wrong and make it right. We always strive to act aggressively, but also make time for introspection, especially on our guiding principles. The first of these is best people, best team and our success is wholly dependent upon having the talent, teamwork and leadership to persevere and win in all circumstances. Our second guiding principal is safety and ethics always and it is our foremost priority to get this right for our customers and shareholders. This week, we announced a major recall of more than 160,000 RZR vehicles to address fire and other thermal risks in our global RZR business. The recall was the culmination of an extensive investigation that ultimately isolated several disparate and difficult to discern root causes. We spared no resource or cost and worked closely with Consumer Product Safety Commission to ensure that we had identified and addressed all of the systematic root causes of these thermal issues. We regret the inconvenience this recall has on our customers, but the safety of our products and our riders must always take precedent. Our final guiding principle is customer loyalty and it is earned not only by the performance and features of our vehicles, but also by our performance when our customers need us. Over the past eight years, our industry-leading RZRs have garnered amazing customer loyalty and we're committed to delivering the part support and experience through this recall to maintain that. Polaris customers expect us to build products that are fun and safe to operate and we're taking this necessary step toward that goal. There were a number of positive developments during the first…

Thanks, Scott. Good morning, everyone. Polaris' first quarter North American retail sales performance improved, increasing 6% assisted by a North American power-sports industry that grew similarly, driven by strength in snowmobiles and side-by-side markets. North American dealer inventory declined 1% versus 2015. Specifically ORV inventory levels were down about 10% year over year, with side-by-sides down upper single digits and ATVs down low double digits percents. Snowmobile levels improved in the first quarter but still remain elevated, up low 20%s due to low snowfall in key regions. Motorcycle inventories, including Slingshot, are now essentially at target levels and are up mid-60%s. Moving on now to business unit performance, starting with off-road vehicles. First quarter ORV revenue decreased 12%, with declines in all brands as we work to further improve dealer inventory health. Polaris North American ORV retail was flat in the first quarter, improving sequentially versus fourth quarter. Polaris ATV retail was up low single digits, with side-by-side retail down just slightly as we came up against particularly strong RZR comparables from last first quarter. Polaris gained a bit of ATV share as we slightly outperformed the North American ATV industry which was also up low single digits. We estimate that the North American side-by-side industry in Q1 improved nicely, up mid to high single digits, so we lost some side-by-side share. Oil state performance remains weak at minus 8%, but declines moderated slightly versus 2015 with the exception of Western Canada. We expect side-by-side share gains to be challenged for the next couple of quarters until many of the competitive new products anniversary their introduction comparables throughout the year. Looking ahead for Q2, it is too early to fully assess how the RZR recall will affect Polaris, but the team has literally been working around the clock to minimize…

Thanks, Bennett and good morning to everyone. As Bennett mentioned earlier in the call, our Spirit Lake motorcycle plant is now producing to planned schedules and inventories are essentially at target levels. In January, we executed a series of planned paint system enhancements in Spirit Lake and today we're meeting production requirements without overtime. Production output in the first quarter was 31% higher than first quarter 2015. Additionally, our manufacturing lead time has improved by 75%. Our new Huntsville, Alabama plant is on plan to start production in the second quarter. Huntsville is a key enabler for our lean enterprise program and it will provide capacity to manage our plant network more efficiently, eliminate costly overtime premiums, access a capable regional supply chain and facilitate future growth. Huntsville will initially produce Ranger side-by-sides and we will add Slingshot production in the third order. Transferring Slingshot from the Spirit Lake area to Huntsville will support Slingshot growth, while increasing available capacity in Spirit Lake for our growing motorcycle business. From a lean perspective, the Huntsville site incorporates our most advanced lean flow and state-of-the-art manufacturing technologies and improves throughput by approximately 80% versus our existing manufacturing facilities. And enables us to execute retail flow management for side-by-sides with less overall inventory while supporting our strong customer base in the southeast United States. Improving our inventory performance is a key element of sour lean enterprise program, as our manufacturing footprint and portfolio products have expended, we have seen increased inventories and reduced inventory turns. To reverse this trend, we're focused on several elements of our lean enterprise program from how we design our products through customer delivery. Key focus areas that enable inventory reduction include side-by-side RFM, inventory planning, vehicle platforming, localization of suppliers, supplier lead-time reduction and reconfiguration of our distribution network. In addition, inventory management is now a key performance metric for incentive compensation at executive levels. First quarter net inventory ended at $710 million, including acquisitions completed in the first quarter which was slightly favorable to our expectations. We expect to see year-over-year inventory reductions beginning in the second half of 2016, with our inventory turns performance improving sequentially going forward. Now I will turn it over to Mike Speetzen, our Chief Financial Officer.

Thanks, Ken and good morning, everyone. As Scott and Bennett mentioned, there were some unanticipated costs in the first quarter related to product liability and warranty. While these items were not contemplated in our previously issued guidance, we were able to cover these additional costs in the first quarter and report earnings in line with our previous expectations. A combination of slightly favorable foreign exchange, improved financial services performance and significantly more aggressive cost actions allowed us to offset these unplanned expenses. We continue to expect total Company sales to be in the range of down 2% to up 3%. On a constant currency basis, this equates to total Company sales being flat to up 5% compared to 2015. Although foreign exchange rates for Canada and Europe were slightly favorable to our expectations in the first quarter, the impact to the top line was not significant. Furthermore, given the volatility of exchange rates in these regions, we're not building in significant upside and have held rates relatively close to our original guidance levels for the balance of the year. Despite incurring substantial unplanned costs in Q1, we're maintaining our earnings per share guidance range for 2016. We expect EPS to be in the range of $6.20 to $6.80, down 8% to up 1% compared to the full year of 2015. On a constant currency basis, earnings per share will be flat to up 9% compared to 2015. While we're maintaining total Company sales guidance, we're slightly adjusting our segment sales growth expectations. Global adjacent markets is now expected to be up in the high single digits percent range, reflecting the recent acquisition of Taylor-Dunn. We also now expect our ORV snowmobile sales to be down low to mid single digits. This reflect a slightly lower growth rate than previously indicated,…

Thanks, Mike. I certainly do not plan to make a habit of reporting declines in sales and earnings, but we were confronting our inventory and market issues head-on and made good progress sequentially from Q4. Indian motorcycle continued to gain share at a healthy clip and Steve Menneto has both our bikes and our dealers on the gas heading into the heart of the riding season. Off-road vehicle sales were sluggish in January and February but improvement notably in March, with our new program launch. For over a year now, we have seen higher variability in our markets from month to month, region to region and even product category to product category. We were much better at anticipating and managing this new normal in the first quarter and remain diligent as we look skeptically at the optimistic outlooks for the economy and our industry. Shorter lead times and standard work are hallmarks of a lean enterprise and both are excellent tools to reduce variability. Ken Pucel is aggressively building our lean capability and the associated VIP cost and inventory reduction initiatives and Dave Longren is successfully championing our broad-based assault on cost. We will spare no resource or cost to effectively execute the RZR recall, as we work to get our customers back on the trails and dunes with ironclad assurance that these thermal issues have been resolved. This is a complex matter on many levels, but I have confidence that our team will implement the repairs and ensure customers and dealers have full access to the best-selling recreational side-by-side ever. It is exciting to watch Matt Homan and Craig Scanlon build and execute their plans to reaccelerate growth in our largest business unit. Demand creation through more advertising and promotion is the most visible element of their efforts, but strategically, there are many more sustainable high-impact actions underway in our off-road vehicle business. Matt now faces a much more competitive environment than he did the last time he ran ORV, but he is never one to bet against. Investing in growth is important to our business, but leveraging those investments properly is key to productivity and profitable growth. From a Huntsville plant that is designed for maximum flow and efficiency to new tooling processes that dramatically reduce costs and lead times, we're investing in our future. Bob Mack inherited a solid acquisition pipeline and we will work together to make another profitable growth engine for Polaris. We need that horsepower to hit our long term goals of becoming an $8-billion Company in 2020. With that, I will turn it over to Melissa to open the line for questions.

[Operator Instructions]. Your first question comes from Jamie Katz with Morningstar. Your line is open.

I have a couple of questions on motorcycles. First can you just discuss maybe the backlog and lead times on getting units to consumers, it sounds like dealers are getting back on track but I'm curious how fast you guys are able to respond to demand there.

Ken and the team have made tremendous progress really over the last six months. From what we're seeing in the business unit now, I don't think we’re quite at what we would call our RFM target yet but the new orders that are coming are flowing rather quickly. As Ken said our lead time is down 75%. We've taken the vast majority of the chunk out of the backlog and we feel like we're in excellent position to respond in a very timely manner to all of our dealers needs as we head into the second quarter. So I am frankly thrilled with where we're.

And then I think you guys said that Slingshot was going overseas and I was under the impression that initially it would primarily be a domestic product but can you talk about maybe the adoption of that product overseas of how we dealers internationally might be responding to that

Yes. It was initially a North American launch and then late last year we put it through the regulatory and homologation so we can ship it into the EU and we did that essentially in the fourth quarter of last year and began some initial ship late in the year and those have continued here through the first quarter. You know we’re kind of just getting into seasonality in Europe and we expect -- response has been good and I think we expect that to be a nice little contributor to Slingshot growth as we move forward. We’re also now I think in Mexico and we continue to look for international opportunities where we've been in the Middle East and the UAE as well. So there is some exciting interest globally for the Slingshot where regulatory laws allow that.

Okay. And then for your factory inventory, can you let us know what part of that is a attributable to Taylor-Dunn acquisition and is may be new to the inventory base?

Yes, it's about $9 million in total.

Your next question comes from Trey Grooms with Stephens. Your line is open.

So really just wanted to get a little bit more understanding around the recall. Kind of really the mechanics there. So with the -- I think it was hundred 160,000 units, were you focused first on repairing the razors that are in the field and then those that are in dealer inventory? And any color you can give us on kind of cost per units you're expecting there.

Yes, Trey, obviously this recall is paramount importance to us because we want to take care of our customers and as Bennett said in his remarks, our first priority is to get our customers that own RZR back to riding as quickly as we possibly can. We will start shipping the kits out on the 22nd and be repairing vehicles in dealerships very, very rapidly from there on out. As Ken said, in his remarks or Bennett, we expect to get do this all the second quarter and we are going to take every opportunity to expedite parts as quickly as we can. We're cutting them into production simultaneously with the shipment of the parts so we will be able to get good products to our dealers. It ultimately works through what's on the floor in our dealerships, get those repaired, but the first priority is to get those customers that have vehicles back to riding as quickly as possible. We're not going to give the specific cost but we do, we covered a good bit of it in the first quarter and then the rest of it is included in our guidance.

Yes, so Trey, we obviously booked it against cost of goods sold from a warranty standpoint, it's about a 120 basis points drag on gross margins in the quarter and as Scott indicated, we do want to get into a lot of detail because obviously the recall is complex and different for each RZR model so the cost per unit is to vary quite a bit based on that.

And then for a follow-up, can you guys go into more detail around shifting your ORV marketing and promotional campaigns more towards the brand versus the deal that you kind of laid out in the presentation. Does this imply being, I guess, less promotional with incentives than you were before? And how does that, how do you balance that with kind of your expectations around market share for the year?

I think if you watched, primarily we’re talking about as our marketing messaging. And I think what we find over the last couple years as we got into a pattern most of our messaging to our customer base was frankly, you would see the TV ad we’re trying to cover the whole portfolio and it became a 30 second ad on what was the factory authorized clearance or what was the XP sales event and we were losing the messaging of our great products and the great strengths that we have in the brand. And so what Matt and the team have really done here and Craig over the last 60 days is they have orientated the message to be much more brand oriented around the strength of RZR, the strength of GENERAL, the strengths of Rangers and so that message is paramount and then we’re tagging at the backend you'll see five seconds of making people aware of what the deal is. So it's just, I think a better positioning of us as the industry leader. I don't think you’re going to see dramatic changes from us from a standpoint about how we run our promotion environment. We're very good at that. I think our dealers appreciate that. Our consumers appreciate that and you should get expect us to continue to be aggressive on the promotional front.

No the implication for share, we’re not changing our share expectations for the year. As Bennett said, we had a very positive reaction in March when we made that shift in the advertising campaigns and we expect some of that momentum to carry forward.

Your next question comes from Robin Farley with UBS. Your line is open.

A couple of questions on the side-by-side business. First, I just want to understand when you're lowering slightly your shipment guidance for snow and ORV, is that more of a reduction in snow or are you also changing your expectation for ORV shipments. And then I have another question after that.

It's a slight reduction on the ORV side and as Bennett indicated, the uncertainty around how the recall could impact us at least here in the short term. I would just say that it's a slightly lower revision in the context of adding an the Taylor-Dunn revenue in the global adjacent market business.

And Robin just a little bit more color on that. If you think about this recall effort, as we've talked about the need to bring Huntsville on long term for capacity reasons, we don't have tremendous excess capacity. So the ability of our plants, if we lose too much production as we're winning for this parts flow to come in, it may not be possible to get it all back. So we're just trying to properly hedge how this works from a production standpoint as we go through the year because it would -- if it turns out that those parts aren't coming in and we lose the capacity for three or four weeks, we would not have the ability to bring that back. We're just trying to be cautious and realistic as we get into this recall initiative. We're very comfortable with the way the teams executing it but I'm trying to be realistic with what could happen.

And I guess the reason I ask is when I look at your side-by-side sales and industry side-by-side sales, the Q1 trends year-over-year were better than the Q4 trends year-over-year and I think the industry up mid-two high single digits, I guess I'm wondering do you see that as an inflection point and maybe let's think about the industry for a minute, Bennett, just sort of taking out the recall and whatever kind of temporary impacts that may have but just looking at demand overall from just slight history growth in Q4 and now being up mid to high single digits. Is this inflection point you think or is there something seasonally there where there would be, even though we're talking a year-over-year basis, just trying to think about how we should look at the trends?

I think a little bit about the drama around side by sides last year got overblown. The whole market and for most industries was really in turmoil in the fourth quarter and I think we saw the weakness in side-by-side's pic if you look at the balance of the year though, side-by-side growth for the industry was reasonably healthy, by our numbers it was up mid to upper single digits and I would tell you we're encouragement by the first quarter bounce back but I think what I'd like to tell you is I don't think it's an inflection point but I think that’s a strong competition industry and I expect side by sides to continue to grow nicely based on what we saw. We're encouraged by the first quarter because frankly we thought it would be a tad soft so that's encouraging to us.

Your next question comes from [indiscernible] with SunTrust. Your line is open.

Just wanted to touch on some of the quality and warranty aspects and I think Scott you mentioned in the preamble that you’re taking steps behind the scenes to eliminate some of the root causes of some of these recalls. But could you just give us a little more color on what kind of the genesis of all of these quality issues are. Is it just the complexity of the product your building. Is it some of the capacity tightness that you've experienced?

I think it's consistent with the vision that we laid out. First of all, bringing Ken on board. If you think about what we're trying to do is create a lean enterprise which ultimately delivers better safety quality, delivery and cost. He's made a ton of press but we're not completely there yet and the RZR recall specifically is a little bit different beast than we've had in the past. Instead of going after one specific issue, we've literally looked at the entire system of the vehicle and tried to determine if there's anything in there that could cause a thermal risk and then going after it. So this is a different way of looking at it than we have in the past and I think will be a better company for it but I don't think it's, because of a bit of an apples and oranges comparison of how we have done things historically, it's not really right to look and say it's dramatically worse than we've ever been. We're taking this seriously. We're learning from it, I'm extremely confident in what Ken is driving in the manufacturing and quality initiatives. It's extremely unfortunate event and we're in the process of getting better but I wouldn't read into it that there's a systematic fundamental problem other than what we've been talking about for a long time of trying to get the fundamentals right of building a lean enterprise to be able to build in quality, reduce rework, reduce warranty consistently over time.

And then, Mike, maybe talk about the retail financing part of the business you guys are taking guidance up a bit there for the full year and I think what you indicated was that some higher penetration rates that you’ve seen in the first quarter. So can you maybe talk about how your looking about that for the full year and as you're these increased penetration rates, does that say anything about the type of credit quality that you are experiencing?

Yes. First of all the credit quality, no. We maintain high standards. We work through several of our retail financing partners that are very strong and we're not looking to expand the credit profile down into areas that are going to put us in to a position that has increased loss reserves. We just don't see that as part of it. I think a lot of it is really driven in the first quarter. We had some incentives in the business relative to the way we were promoting snowmobiles for example, that ultimately drove a fair amount of volume into some of our retail partners. And as you know, we share in the profits of those businesses and so that's really what led to it. We took the financial services guidance up to I can tell you, you're talking a couple of million bucks from a full-year standpoint and a significant portion of that was what we recognized in the first quarter.

Your next question comes from James Hardiman with Wedbush Securities. Your line is open.

To close the loop here on recall stuff. So $30 million in the first quarter, how much of that was COGS versus OpEx and can you give us a full year number of sort of incremental costs that you now have to incur versus the last time you give us guidance.

Yes, so as I mentioned earlier, about 120 basis points of impact and gross margins. If you look at our year-over-year increase in our operating expenses, about 60% of that is related to product liability, M&A, as well as the severance that we booked. We're obviously not going to get into a lot of the details for of that for obvious reasons, but that's really the sum total of what came through in the first quarter. Now we in our guidance have contemplated the severance costs because that was part of our cost action plan but the acquisitions, product liability and the warranty recall were obviously not contemplated.

And then, I'm not sure if you wanted to speak to maybe what the full year number is, but then beyond that, I guess my follow up is on the currency side. Correct me if I'm wrong. I think you said that you're assuming $0.71 for the Canadian Dollar. It's at $0.79. You're not going to assume that at this point but if it stays at 0.79, I get to about $0.20 plus in upside just as the Canadian Dollar stays where it is, is that the right way to think about things?

Yes, the reason we did not move currency assumption, one it significantly changed after we had closed off the first quarter and that just gives you a sense of the volatility. The number you got is pretty close and again, we’ve seen that currency move $0.02 or $0.03 in a given day. So I would just costs and against just adding that to the top line and obviously as we go forward, we're going to bake that in as we incur it. The important thing to realize is that it's all translation. We've hedged about 80% of any of the cash flow movements. So it's not economic per say but it would add to the top line. And then back to your first question around the full-year costs. We essentially book coming out of the first quarter everything that was anticipated based on what we knew about the recall at the time. So obviously we’re not anticipating additional costs but that’s not off the table as we get deeper into the recall and understand how the mechanics work in more detail.

Your next question comes from Lee Giordano with Sterne Agee CRT.

I was hoping you talk a little more about the overall motorcycle market. Looks like it was flat in Q1. I guess any puts and takes for the industry and how the market could trend during the remainder of the year? Thanks.

Clearly I think there was another motorcycle player that reported earlier a little different numbers than ours. So it's not really as much an industry thing as it is a brand dealership and bike thing I believe. So we're not expecting a dramatic increase in the market. We expect to slog it out. I think Steve Menneto has really done a nice job, not only with Indian but now with the octane coming in our midsized bike, with Victory like we've got another arrow in our quiver so we feel good about where the motorcycle industry is. As you know where very dependent upon weather. We're thinking the economy, it's okay. I wouldn't say it's great. We do think that with the increased advertising and promotion, there's a chance that there's going to be a little bit of tailwind for the industry and we expect to benefit from that. Nice wins, somebody else pays for your advertising and we're encouraged by where we're in motorcycles right now.

And then just secondly on the performance of your business in oil and ag markets, have you seen a potential bottoming in declines in those regions? Thanks.

I would say oil is performing pretty much how we called it. We expected it to be weak. We expected it to stay weak for most of the year, but as it started to come up against annualize against some of the weaker comps that we would see it be so to speak less bad and that's largely how the first quarter played out and I think we'll continue to see that in all honesty through the balance of the year, maybe up until fourth quarter which was particularly weak. So I expect oil will continue to be tough and then we will see maybe by fourth quarter if we start to see it anniversary and start to look up

Your next question comes from [indiscernible] with Citigroup. Your line is open.

Just with respect to March and the improvement that you saw there, was that fairly meaningful and how much of that do you think is underlying versus maybe weather related?

Again, we usually try not to comment about inter-quarter movements but this one was substantial and I think in all honesty it's probably a little bit of both in all honesty, I mean we clearly were operating differently and with our advertising and our promotion and the dealers responded in almost universally positive to the cleaner tighter message and the aggressiveness behind it. So there's no question the program had a large part to do with it as well as the advertising program and I'm sure weather helped little bit. So we’re hoping that we're going to see that be relatively sustainable as we go forward. We expect to do better going forward just like we saw in March.

Second, as a follow up, when did you see that, when will you or did you see the full benefit of the general launch? Could we see maybe a greater contribution in the second quarter than you saw in the first quarter and how impactful could that actually be to your overall retail sales?

Yes, we were rolling be product out really through the first quarter and I think as we started to get into the second half of the quarter, we started to see really what I call material benefits. But we're still feeding it, dealers are still asking for more products. So I think second quarter you'll see a bigger impact and I think as we get into second quarter, I'd like to think that should be more of a steady-state. I think that's clearly a product on the rise and it's going to be a very nice addition to the Polaris side-by-side family based on what we're seeing right now.

Your next question comes from Scott Hammond with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is open.

In terms of that ORV retail picking up in March, is it fair to say that your share dynamic fared better as the quarter kind of ended versus earlier in the quarter?

Yes. Spirit yet how we so. Scott, we don't get monthly data. But we believe so. It seems pretty obvious to us as we look at the numbers.

Okay. And then just a follow-up on gross margin. Obviously it sounds like you didn't change the gross margin guidance much for currency and you had an incremental headwind with these costs that we have been talking about. So picking it up 20 basis points, what were some of the real underlying positives that were different than they were at the beginning of the year?

I think Scott hit on a number of them. I think Ken and his team income nation with Dave Longren really have made this all out assault on cost come to life and we really got on a number of areas much faster than we had originally anticipated. And I think in light of seeing some of these headwinds coming our way, these things didn't happen overnight so we had a little bit of advanced lead time to really try and reconfigure and reorder where we’re going after. One thing I would tell you is that in showing up in gross margins, so we’re obviously going to continue to monitor our general and administered cost but we're not going to sales and marketing or engineering and trying to pull back there. We’re really going after where we think we have got the most opportunity, our largest cost basis it's over $3 billion and I think Ken and Dave and the team are really doing a good job there.

Your next question comes from Brandon Rolle with Longbow Research. Your line is open.

I wanted to touch on the side-by-side segment with the segment down low single digits year-over-year, would you be able to break out what you saw in Ranger versus RZR. And the follow on that, do you see the new GENERAL model cannibalizing sales of RZR and Ranger in the of upcoming quarters? Thank you.

We're not going to give you any specific color between RZR and Ranger other than I think you can deduce that they were down slightly and they both were down a little bit. The general, as I said in my remarks, I think we’re pleased. It's a crossover segment and we had modeled in reasonable amount of cannibalization but again, it's early. First three months, but what we've seen is it's bringing in a new incremental customer that frankly was not in the Polaris family. And I think we find that very, very encouraging that if we can continue that kind of trend with the customer base, it could be a very nice incremental play for us. So early returns are good. It's not doing a heavy degree of cannibalization of either Ranger or RZR like

Your next question comes from Craig Kennison with Baird. Your line is open.

Bennett, you guys have made huge strides on the inventory front, really surprising in many respects but some dealers have expressed frustration to us that their returns on the inventory are not as good as it used to be. Is that a fair characterization or is that -- are we missing something?

I think Craig, I think we’re hearing that too. I think there are a couple things that drive that, you get into a little bit of dealer psychology and I'm not going to play psychologist but when you're chasing demand and you are in a massive growth uptick, they feel like they can't get enough and they are more aggressive and they are more confidence and when things slow down like we saw a little bit in the second half of the year, I think guys get worried about things they are a little bit more aggressive on moving on the deals and I think I feel that pressure from their peers that kind of can cut into the margins a little bit and as a manufacturer I think what's incumbent on us and why you see as being so aggressive about trying to take dealer inventory down and move to retail flow management model is we really want to get to a full model so that there is no even perception that there is excess availability out there that you just get the right product, at the right place, at the right time and then make sure that we drive the right kind of behaviors within our channel and I think we still have work to do on that, clearly.

And you know, this is a conflict that Tim Larson is really taking on personally and championing within the company. It's a multi-pronged approach and I think is not something we're going to turn around in the second quarter. But it's partially as Bennett said, was driving dealer inventory, partially with the additional tools that we give the dealer and we have a lot of tools that we're developing. We believe that we'll get this back. Just because of the sheer volume, they historically made to radically more money with Polaris than they have with other products. And I think right now as the volume slows little bit, they're looking at the specific margin per unit that they get and they're looking at that disparity. So we’re working through that Tim's guide and I think when you come to the analyst meeting in July, we'll be able to put a little bit more color on some of the steps we’re taking.

Your next question comes from Tim Conder with Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is open.

Let me stay on that same thing, given that you're seeing a little bit more aggressiveness and innovation from several key competitors and the promotional environment, would you say then that the RFM is probably is the big differentiator. Again you’re going to continue on with the innovation that's a given. But is RFM the big differentiator versus those other key competitors, that's question one. And then for Mike, back to the FX and the guidance here. You commented related to the Canadian Dollar which is your largest exposure. But given the sensitivity that you have provided many 90 days ago and the moves in the other currencies, it would seem the Canadian Dollars is $0.20 some odd cents just in the movement where spot rate is, but the other currencies also would appear to have added some additional benefit. So again I guess, back to why not take a little bit of that in the guidance?

Tim, let me into your first question first and let Mike cover the currency question. I want to focus on terminology here. You said RFM going to be the differentiator and it's absolutely not the differentiator. It is a differentiator or an differentiator, a differentiator that is going to be part of the tools but I don't think you should ever underestimate the innovation and both on the products, it's really good product innovation in the pipeline. But also again, what Tim is doing on the front end of our business for and with our dealers, it's altogether part of it. But I don't think that you should in any way underestimate how we're working to differentiate our products from the competitors. It is by no means something that used to happen at Polaris and no longer is going to happen.

And Tim, on the foreign-exchange side. I mean certainly you’ve got a valid point there. I think a couple of places that have plan to it is one, the benefit we saw in the first quarter from not only the Canadian Dollar but also the euro move, it was just around $5 million in revenue so it gives you a sense it really didn’t move things dramatically. A part of that is the shipment level in the first quarter relative to Canada and Europe is relatively low compared to the rest of you. We've also seen some currencies move the other way throughout the portfolio and so that's obviously put some pressure on the bottom line. I think the answer is pretty simple for us which is at the end of the day we’re going to continue to tell you guys as we churn through the year how much of an impact the currency is having. If we feel things are stabilizing we'll obviously start to get a little bit more comfortable. You saw us do that with the Canadian dollar. Our original assumption going into the budget was just around $0.69 we moved it up to $0.71 because that have tended to be a bit of a floor but what I don’t want to do is put a big number out there and then we get to the end of the quarter and we’re talking about a miss that’s purely driven by foreign-exchange translation. I would rather have us be able to give you the pieces as we go through the year.

Your next question comes from Scott Stember, CL King. Your line is open.

Could you talk about this new go to market strategy on the ORVs, maybe just talk about, was this side-by-side versus ATVs. Was this RZR versus Ranger? Which model was is really geared toward in which models did you actually see the rebound in retail in March and just maybe also talk about whether this new mode of going to market is how much more expensive if at all it is versus the prior methods?

I probably wouldn't characterize it as going to market, but what we did is obviously be a little bit more brand related and then we done a tremendous amount of implication in our programs. As we became the industry leader and we're being attacked on multiple fronts, I mean we’re very good at promotion but I think our program complexity had gotten quite severe frankly that you also needed a doctorate and a squadron of people to interpret what programs we're offering you on a monthly basis. And certainly that reduces our effectiveness. So that's really what Matt and Craig have been working to clean up a little bit like and that affects the entire portfolio but particularly at least as we headed into the spring, our focus was on but we call Keith models, bread and butter winners in both the RZR and the Ranger family where we're seeing a fair amount of competitive activity and new entrants. And I think that's the areas in all honesty that you’ve seen the most significant improvement along with a very nice start to the new GENERAL that we’re starting to build the brand on.

And the overall expense? Is it more than the previous--

The new approach doesn't necessarily affect spend patterns but what's going on in the competitive environment and our strategy guys that and I will tell you we're going to defend our market share position in a very competitive environment vigorously and I think we're going to spent a little bit more than we did last year, I think which is appropriate based on the environment.

But the first quarter was essentially a geography shift.

Your next question comes from Joe Spak with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Two quick ones. First one is for Ken, if I look at the timeline for Huntsville on page 16, is it fair to assume that proper absorption of cost run rate is into early '17, maybe you could just talk a little bit about that. And Mike, on FX, I agree with your strategy. The question is really on the hedging. It looks like you stepped up the percentage of cash flows that are hedged quite meaningfully and I was wondering if you give a little bit of color as to how long those go and whether you expect to sort of keep rolling them every quarter or so.

Yes, Joe just let me talk FX so let me just give you an intro back into Huntsville. The strategy on the hedging is we're rolling forward as we speak into 2017, given the volatility that we saw, we tried to put ourselves in a position with Canada on the cash flow side to essentially mitigate as much as we were comfortable with, going much above 80% gets vehicle but risky because if you have a significant move in volume you can and up having hedge accounting problem and we feel like we protected ourselves pretty well and we got a pretty active process Bennett and I sit down with the treasury growth on a pretty consistent basis and walk through that. We’re already starting to layer into 2017 to really make sure that we're protecting the cash position of the company.

So from an absorption perspective and I think about that in a few different dimensions. First year have this year we're not starting until May, so if you add growth to that and annualize the rate, we're about 50% next year at rate where we want to be over the next four years. But I don't just view the cost implication as an absorption issue. I look at throughput being up 80% versus our current technology. I look at labor improve 10%. I look at that [indiscernible] velocities, lead time reductions. Total value propositions for and how you view the cost of Huntsville is a big lean strategy, much more comprehensive than just absorption.

Your next question comes from Jimmy Baker with B Riley Company. Your line is open.

So after losing some side-by-side share in the first quarter and now an expectation for at least some disruption from the recall, can you just talk about what you're doing to ensure that you don't suffer some lasting loss of for planned share at your multi-line dealers that are maybe allocating more their capacity to the share gainers and then my follow-up is on the financial services commentary. Are you confident the competitive lending availability is not contributing to your improved penetration and lastly, will you incur any for plan costs for these inventoried RZRs that may sit waiting for the recall kits as customer vehicles are prioritized? Thanks.

On the side by side share standpoint, I think our priority is kind of balance -- our top priority right now is to make sure we execute this recall as complicated as it is, as seamlessly as we can for our dealers and our consumers and that's our top priority as an enterprise right now. And I think if we do that, I think there'll be some modest short term impact, but I think people will appreciate how we respond and I think you will learn a lot about your partners on how they respond during a little bit of a crisis and we expect to be what we hope is a shining star as partners. So that's really how we're attacking that and I think Scott alluded to an earlier answer, we have great innovation pipeline. We have got a very clear I think improved, as Scott mentioned, go to market plans with how we're going to market and I feel really good about our ability to complete in the short time medium and long term with side-by-side. The market is growing and we're the preeminent leader and we expect to continue to be that going forward.

And to your last question, we will cover some of the flooring costs for our dealers and obviously not going to expect them to be hurt by this.

And Jimmy, on the retail side, I want to keep reiterating the credit quality of the customers that go through our retail financing partners is maintained. We're not seeing any significant uptick in loss rates and frankly our credit partners aren't interested into dip and weigh down in those FICO ranks to try and get the business. So while this is really steered by the types of promotional programs that we’re running in the first quarter as I mentioned earlier and really making sure that the retail partners are there to get the right customers approved into our vehicles.

Your next question comes from Mark Smith with Feltl and Company. Your line is open.

Mike, just looking at the operating expense guidance, just want to understand the second quarter guidance. Did you say that would be up 10% total operating expenses in Q2?

Yes. So very similar to the commentary I gave in the first quarter, a lot of that is really just driven by really two elements. One is even though we had moderated expense last year, there's a lapping effect of cost that had been added in the first and second quarter number one. Number two, as I've indicated in our prior call, we took a pretty heavy hit in terms of our both our short term and long term incentive plans last year and as we roll into 2015, we’re obviously accruing those plans at levels that are commensurate with us making our financial [indiscernible] this year and so that gives is little bit of headwind. So those are really the two big drivers. You know outside of that, we’re driving a very disciplined cost management program prior to the first quarter one off events that we had. We had a view to the full year operating expenses being down as a percent of sales. So we're going to continue to have that rigor and discipline behind making sure we are prioritizing and looking for opportunities to take cost estimate

If I'm looking at the full year, you've got to have a pretty big decline year-over-year in the second half of the year to hit that full-year guidance.

On operating expenses?

Our operating expenses.

In terms of the percent of sales, it's more about slowing the momentum down to be more similar to what we had as an exit rate coming out in last year.

Your last question comes from Chris Krueger with Lake Street Capital. Your line is open.

Just one question. As you guys move into your new facility in Huntsville and shift some production from other facilities to that one, do you see any kind of disruption at the current facilities as far as capacity utilization or moving equipment around or changing the hours of the workforce or whatnot?

No. And we've got the right team and we have got good planning and one think that Polaris does pretty well is transfer product and that's what we’re doing this time. So we've got it covered.

We went over a little bit of time there. I want to thank everyone for participating in the call this morning and we look forward to talking to you next quarter. Thanks again and goodbye.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen this concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.