Welcome to the Royal Philips First Quarter 2021 Results Conference Call on Monday, April 26, 2021. During the call hosted by Mr. Frans van Houten, CEO and Mr. Abhijit Bhattacharya, CFO; all participants will be in a listen-only mode. After the introductions, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this call will be recorded and a replay will be available on the Investor Relations website of Royal Philips. I will now hand the conference over to Mr. Leandro Mazzoni, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Good morning and welcome to Philips first quarter 2021 results conference call. Joining me today are our CEO, Frans van Houten; and our CFO, Abhijit Bhattacharya. Frans and Abhijit will take you through our strategic and financial highlights for the period and after that we will take your questions. Our press release and the related information slide deck were published at 7:00 AM CET this morning. Both are available on our Investor Relations website. A full transcript of this call will also be made available today on the website. Before we start, I would like to remind you of a few things. As mentioned in the press release, adjusted EBITDA is defined as income from operations excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets, impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, restructuring charges, acquisition-related costs, and significant one-off items. Comparable growth for sales and orders are adjusted for currency and portfolio changes. As of this quarter, the Domestic Appliances business is reported as discontinued operations. Sales and results from this business are no longer included in the results of continuing operations and relevant assets and liabilities are reported under assets and liabilities held for sale. The restated statements of income for 2019 and 2020 reflecting these changes are available on our Investor Relations website. Finally, all forward-looking projections exclude the Domestic Appliances business. Over to you, Frans.

Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I hope that you and your families are keeping safe and well. The COVID-19 pandemic is far from over and our teams remain focused on delivering against our triple duty of care, meeting customer needs, safeguarding the health and safety of our employees, and ensuring business continuity. Despite the ongoing impact of COVID-19, our performance gained momentum with a strong 9% comparable sales growth and an adjusted EBITDA margin increase of almost 400 basis points in the first quarter. Diagnosis & Treatment sales grew 9%, our Connected Care businesses delivered 7% comparable sales increase, and sales for Personal Health grew a very strong 17%. We are also encouraged by the strong 11% comparable order intake growth for the Diagnosis & Treatment businesses with all major markets contributing driven by the sequential improvement of electives and hospital CapEx and the very positive customer response to our innovative products and solutions. Comparable order intake for the Connected Care businesses decreased as anticipated following the exceptional growth in Q1 2020 driven by the demand for hospital ventilators and patient monitors. Looking ahead while we continue to see uncertainty related to the impact of COVID, we see increased demand in the Diagnosis & Treatment and Personal Health businesses. We are raising our growth guidance given this momentum and we now plan to deliver low to mid single-digit comparable sales growth in 2021 compared to our earlier plan of low single-digit growth still with an adjusted EBITDA margin improvement of 60 basis points to 80 basis points. I would like to provide some color on some of our initiatives to respond to the needs of today's hospital leaders across the globe as they plan for the future. In the quarter, we expanded our range of remote…

Thank you, Frans, and thank you all for joining us today. I hope you and your families are well and safe. Let me start by providing some color on the first quarter comparable sales of 9%. I'd like to remind you that this comparable sales growth does not include the double-digit growth of our recently acquired companies, BioTelemetry and Capsule Technologies. Our Diagnosis & Treatment businesses comparable sales growth grew 9% in the quarter. Diagnostic imaging sales grew double digit driven by strong installations of computed tomography and magnetic resonance. Ultrasound and Enterprise Diagnostic Informatics sales grew high single digit. Image guided therapy sales saw solid sequential improvement and grew mid-single digit in the quarter mainly driven by strong traction of our devices business as we saw good return to growth at the end of the quarter especially in the United States. The volume of elective procedures gradually improved during the first quarter with March tracking above pre-COVID levels. We expect that elective procedures volumes to continue to gradually increase in the course of the year as hospitals normalize their operation and also work through the backlog of patients. The sales of the Connected Care business grew 7% in the first quarter driven by double-digit growth in Patient Monitoring as we continue to successfully convert the strong order book into sales. This was partly offset by a mid single-digit decline in sleep and respiratory care on the back of a strong Q1 last year driven by COVID-19 demand. We were also pleased to see the recovery in our emergency care business with another quarter of double-digit growth. This business was formerly called Therapeutic Care. For Personal Health, we saw strong demand in the quarter with a comparable sales increase of 17%. Personal care grew strong double digit and oral healthcare…

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Veronika Dubajova from Goldman Sachs. Please state your question.

Hi, good morning, Frans, Abhijit, and thanks for taking my questions. Two, please and both related to the guidance for the full year. The first one is just on revenues and trying to parse out where that incremental confidence is coming from in terms of the low to mid single-digit organic sales growth versus what you had guided for previously. Can you maybe talk through what are some of the moving parts where you've become incrementally more confident? Is it PH, is it D&T, is it a specific region, is it a specific business line? If you can just shed some light into that, that would be really helpful. And then my second question, I appreciate you don't guide for EPS. But obviously this year there's quite a lot of moving parts; we have the dilution from Domestic Appliances from the disposal, you have some contribution coming in from acquisitions. And just curious if you can level set for us Abhijit how we should think about EPS development in '21. And I guess looking beyond 2021, if you can comment on some of your mid-term expectations on EPS growth and how we should level set those off the new base. That would be very helpful. Thanks, guys.

Yes. Hi Veronika. Great to hear you and I sympathize with your question on EPS. Abhijit will try to answer it as best as we can given the circumstances, but indeed. Let me start on the revenue traction. So if I take you back to the Capital Markets Day guidance where we said D&T and Personal Health should grow in the 5% to 6% bracket while Connected Care given the difficult compare will first have a year of a negative and then in 2022 also be in that frame. Okay. So, that's the framing of it. Now obviously as we said in the call, Connected Care stays with the same guidance of approximately high single-digit, low double-digit decline year-on-year, which then implies that all the upside comes from Diagnosis & Treatment and Personal Health, both of which will grow ahead of the 5% to 6% range this year. We see strong order momentum in Diagnosis & Treatment with the order growth of 11%. The 11% order growth in Q1 is driven across the world. Basically China high single-digit; North America double-digit growth in orders, I think very pleasing and perhaps also a precursor of what can happen when COVID becomes more under control; and Europe in all a very solid around 6% order growth. So - and much driven by IGT, which of course was weak last year. Customers holding back on orders, also postponing shipments, and now that comes back with a vengeance as there is a backlog in patients, elective procedures are stacked up. Now that's then also maybe a nice bridge to talk about the consumables. We have seen a very nice uptick in the course of Q1 and you can really track how COVID gets under control. In the United States, March was very strong on…

Yes. So, hi Veronika. If you look at last year, we estimate that DA had probably about €0.24 contribution to our EPS. If you look for this year with our now increased sales guidance, we will compensate most of that. Maybe about €0.17, €0.18 of that will get compensated with the growth of the Company itself and the adjusted EBITDA growth. Important to understand that we will have a lower share count. So, we will complete the buyback this year so that will also add to the EPS. And then finally, I guided for lower tax rate this year that also contributes positively. So with this, we will actually be able to offset the dilution of EPS with last year. And then of course we have BioTel and Capsule which are doing well and they will probably even result in slight incremental EPS this year for the Group compared to last year. So last year if I include DA and this year if I exclude DA, our EPS will still go up. And then if you let's say look forward, of course that will go up in the range that we have guided for improved earnings as well as slightly lower restructuring costs. So, I think on a good trajectory there.

All right. Did this answer your question, Veronika?

Yes. That was very helpful. Thanks, guys.

The next question comes from Hassan Al-Wakeel from Barclays. Please state your question.

Thank you. I have a couple, please. So, firstly on the DreamStation 1, could you talk about some of the issues that have been reported by users and whether any of these have been significant? And what does the current provision account for as it relates to the 3 million to 4 million installed base and whether that - whether you expect any short-term impact on sales because of these issues? And then if I can ask a second question on the broader performance of the sleep business. Where are diagnosis rates relative to pre-COVID levels and do you think you're gaining share here? Thank you.

Yes, hi. Good morning, Hassan. The issue with the DreamStation 1 family and related products come out of our post-market surveillance where we have picked up reports from users that lead us to do this warning. The occurrence rate is very, very low and in the last year got accelerated because of what we have discovered, the use of unauthorized detergents in cleaning the machine. In the U.S., there's quite a lot of locations that have started to use ozone to disinfect the machine and in fact that has an impact on the foam used in the machine which makes it degrade. Globally we have seen some occurrence of that phenomena in high humidity and high temperature environments. As I said, the occurrence rate is very, very low, 0.03% off the top of my head. Nevertheless being responsible and proactive, we don't want to have this happen and we are going to repair the machines in the field, for which we have taken the provision. Now the installed base is very high given that Philips is the market leader in sleep apnea - sleep app devices and there's a several millions out there - couple of millions out there and that relates then to the magnitude of the provision. I hope that that scopes that a bit. It is early stage because we wanted to go out immediately and we are also in parallel then engaging the regulatory agencies with whom we have to detail out the field safety notice as is customary practice. I want to emphasize this is coming out of our own post-market surveillance actions. Now then you ask does it have impact on sales. The good thing is that we have launched DreamStation 2. That product is already authorized in the United States and is of…

The next question comes from Patrick Wood from Bank of America. Please state your question.

Good morning. Thank you very much. I'll just ask my two upfront if I can. The first, I think you gave a little bit of color, but a little bit more would be great. Within Connected Care and the patient monitoring business, just giving us a sense of how much traction we're starting to see in the general ward and so outside of the ICU. Obviously that's a long-term driver there, but I'm just curious as to what you're seeing and how the outlook is looking. And then as the second question; thank you Frans, you touched on this earlier. IGT devices, obviously good data out of the ILLUMINATE trial. But more short term. I'm just curious if the devices were up double digit in Q1, the hardware must have been pretty weak. still. Can you help us understand why we've seen such a dramatic acceleration in the core diagnostic Imaging business, but then on the more procedure focused side of things, it seems the recovery curve has been quite a bit slower albeit it sounds like the order book's going better. But just help us understand why one has just leapfrogged so fast versus the other one. That would be very helpful. Thank you.

Yes, absolutely. Let me start with Connected Care and Patient Monitoring. Yes, we see Patient Monitoring coming more and more outside of the ICU. And let me just also explain that most COVID wards in hospitals are not ICU wards so many patients that have moderate COVID never make it into let's say the proper ICU and are in COVID wards. COVID wards that we have equipped with monitoring as well as with ventilators. We also see a general trend towards remote supervision using Command Center technology where you can overlook - or your central stations if you like where you can overlook cohorts of patients with a higher patient to staff ratio. Finally, we are seeing hospitals standardize on an enterprise level to one vendor as it integrates with their informatics network. There's a general feeling that hospital informatics are too fragmented, too much patchwork, and standardization is the name of the game. And finally, hospitals and providers are gearing up for the out-of-hospital monitoring and want to leverage a uniform strong architecture across their enterprise. This plays very much into our hands because we are a market leader and we are then often the party on which hospitals are standardizing and that's strengthened by our innovations in Command Centers and EICU. And now with the extension with Capsule being able to integrate data from other sources and BioTelemetry expanding monitoring outside of the hospital, the portfolio becomes pretty comprehensive for such an enterprise play. So, I think it bodes well for the future and I would express my expectation that monitoring at large is going to grow at a higher pace versus 2019 structurally. Then your IGT question, Hassan. I mentioned that the - sorry, Patrick. I mentioned that the electives are up, but that is if phenomena late in the quarter. So January, we were still behind 2019; February, we started to become kind of breakeven on 2019; and then in March, we soared ahead. That also means that IGT devices as such is not yet showing this massive impact on the revenue cycle of Q1, but it's a rather a good news for Q2 and beyond. That then also suggests that the revenue in Q1 was in fact supported by IGT systems installations and the order intake in the quarter was also very much driven by IGT systems.

The next question comes from Michael Jungling from Morgan Stanley. Please state your question.

Thank you and good morning. I have three questions. Firstly, when it comes to the 2020 guidance upgrade if you had a further chance to raise organic sales growth because let's call it pent-up demand, would you consider in the next round some upside to the EBIT margin which currently seems to be set in stone at around 60 basis points to 80 basis points? And then question number two is on the DreamStation 1 provision. Can you comment on what physically happened on the ground? Do all sleep apnea machines have to be returned to Philips for repair and/or inspection? What happens if patients need a sleep apnea machine, will you provide a replacement? And thirdly, if you look at the provision, it's around €71 for the 3.5 million machine or if the incidence rate is 0.03%, it's 1,050 machines so the provision of €238,000. So, it's a wide range. Which one is it? How are you providing for this? Can you give more color on what the maths is behind this? Thank you.

Right. Well, Michael, your first question is of course very hypothetical that if we were to further increase guidance, what would we do. So with your permission, I'm not going to speculate on that. The reason why we keep the guidance the 60 basis point to 80 basis point at this time is that we do see some higher freight cost, we see a tight semiconductor market so the intake cost, we want to be a bit careful there. We don't want to get ahead of our skis here on margin and for now we see this as very good underpinning and also potentially with a few mix effects. You recall of course that last year Patient Monitoring had a very strong impact on the mix. It's a very profitable product. And if you now let's say have a slightly different mix, then that has an influence. So, we just want to be cautious on not getting ahead of ourselves on margin. Then on your further inquiry on the DreamStation. So, indeed occurrence rate very low. However, the intended precautionary measures will expand to the entire base of the DreamStation 1 related family whether or not symptoms are there. Now that's for - so that's the cautionary approach that we take. If the discussion with regulators lead us to a different conclusion, then that can change. But at this time we think that this is the most - the best course of action. We have calculated this on the basis of an expected time of intervention in the field per unit times the amount of units and leveraging, as I said before, also our DMEs and others. I want to assure everybody on the call that the device is safe to be continued to use to the best of our knowledge at this time. Of course this will also be discussed with the regulator, but our own expectation is that users can continue to use it. And then as we repair the units, they either get a replacement unit or they get their own unit back. That still needs to be determined. So, I don't want to be completely precise about that. Michael, does that answer your questions?

It does. Maybe a brief follow-up. You mentioned that people are using ozone, which is against the FDA regulations or against the user manual. Why is it your problem then? If someone wants to use a cleaning agent that is not even permitted, why are you taking responsibility for that in those provisions?

Well, patient safety is always our concern and we have been very clear to set first comes the patient. We don't want to debate culpability at this time or who's done it because that doesn't help the patient. And so if there is something to be said about what is the root cause and why did people choose a certain way of cleaning the device, then that can be an endless debate. At this time, that should not be the debate. We should just deal with the issue and then later on we can sort out whether how this cleaning came about. I mean if we look around the world, the use of ozone is typically a U.S. issue and then within the U.S., it is related to certain regions where certain companies have been very active in marketing that method. But that's all let's say 2020 hindsight. The FDA observed this and also put out safety notice to say don't use ozone for sleep app machines. Nevertheless, we are - we cannot control that. But we don't want to focus on lots of culpability questions. Our prime concern is let's take this small risk out of the market and deal with it proactively.

The next question comes from Lisa Clive from Bernstein. Please state your question.

Hi. Thanks very much. Just two questions on Patient Monitoring. So first of all, you discussed a little bit the potential to move into the general ward. Number one, what is the sort of technology limitation here? Is it the reliability of wireless sensors and I guess sort of are sensors - are wireless sensors good enough to be accurate enough to have connectivity that's very consistent et cetera or are we still a little bit early in that stage? And number two, as those wireless sensors get better then, that opens up the whole market. But a question more on the sort of pricing model in the home because obviously the actual hardware would come into competition potentially with all sorts of gadgets from the likes of Apple, Fitbit, et cetera. So if we think about how the sort of value across your Patient Monitoring business, what proportionate today is sort of the hardware itself versus the software and the sort of broader connectivity? And to that end as this market develops so there's actually more in the home, how will that look? Thanks.

Yes. Hi Lisa. Great questions. On your first one with regards to adoption, I would actually say that technology is not a limitation at all. This is all about hospitals having to change their ways of working. If you put monitoring in a general ward, then you also need to organize for somebody to oversee the central station where you can look at a whole cohort of patients. Patients that don't - that are using a wireless device, they can wander around so that also means do you want to track where the patient is or not. Technically all of that is possible. We have solutions for that, but actually hospitals can only adopt this once they change their ways of working. Now I mentioned earlier that COVID has been an accelerator for the use of monitoring in general wards or COVID wards and as hospitals were struggling with shortage of staff, then having monitors aided by a central station could actually help take care of more patients with less staff. So, I think providers have gotten a good insight and boost of how changing ways of working is actually a good thing for patients and for productivity. So, no technological limitations. We have everything available. Similarly with the home, technology is there. I would not jump straight to consumer devices as you mentioned. Actually the data coming out of those devices is causing doctors to despair because they get a lot of people coming in look at my data kind of thing and which then bridges already to what is your operating model behind the technology so that you can actually handle large cohorts of patients with data coming in whereby AI in the cloud stratifies the patients as to who needs what and why and directed to the responsible in the care team that is appropriate to the severity of an incident because this is a whole new world of how do you organize care. And that maybe is then the final bridge to hardware, software, and services ratio because the services will play an increasing role in handling remote patient monitoring whereby the device becomes a smaller proportion of the value and the software and the services become the bigger proportion of the value. I'm over asked to give you a number in this call unless my friends here at the table can help me out quickly. But I don't want to guesstimated a number that that I think [indiscernible]. We take that separately, Lisa, then in future calls we will share that with the whole community.

Okay. Thank you. And then one just very quick follow-up question. I think I read somewhere recently that the FDA is thinking about trying to regulate the sort of consumer health related devices. Are you aware of what they're thinking here? And I guess obviously the likes of Apple and Google et cetera have enough money that if they want to get involved in medical devices, they certainly can hire the regulatory people to do so. But what do you think are sort of barriers to entry for big players like that coming into the monitoring market?

Well, I mean these devices are already regulated. If you put heart rate risen monitor in a watch then that's already a Class II device. So, that is regulated. The - from my story, you also heard that people are worried about what happens with the data, how does it disrupt the healthcare market, who can have access to the data, how safe is it. So, it's a new world out there that indeed deserves to be further scrutinized from a regulatory perspective. Also interoperability is a big factor and what are patients taking away from the data because it worries them unnecessarily sometimes and also that is something the FDA is concerned about. So, I would say this is not just a technological barrier, it's much more the overall ecosystem that needs to be looked at.

The next question comes from David Adlington from JPMorgan. Please state your question.

Thanks for the questions. So, two please. So just a follow-up on the field repair €250 million provision. Is that provision purely for the field repairs or is there some litigation goes into that? And just to make sure, has there been any litigation started or any patients injured? And secondly, quite good start in the free cash flow from Abhijit. Just wondering if you can give any thoughts in terms of free cash flow for the year, please.

Sure, David. Let me say that the amount is related to the field action. I've already flagged that any slowness in the business near term is absorbed within the business and compensated elsewhere and therefore not expected to further impact. This is very early stage so we are acting on the fact that we got a few reports out of the field out of our post-market surveillance and our own test. We are taking proactive action here even though the earlier question around ozone and that's not us, that's somebody else. Doesn't matter, we are taking proactive action. There are no litigations here at this time. Moreover I can say that we have not seen reports of severe user harm. We have seen some reports of irritation, but not severe patient harm. And moreover it's still to our knowledge safe to use the machines in - while we are going about preparing and executing all this field action. Then maybe, Abhijit.

Yes. On the cash flow, yes, I think it's a good start to the year. Like I mentioned, our working capital management has been better. In general, our overdue receivables have come down quite substantially so that's a good operating result. Our net income or our profit increase for the year was also good. We were helped a little bit also by the calendar so that will be a bit lower in Q2. But I think overall for the year, we are in line with what we had guided for and it will be a tad lower depending on how much is the cash out for the repair actions that we have to take on the DreamStation issue. But for the rest, I think we are glad with the way we have started the year.

The next question comes from Scott Bardo from Berenberg. Please state your question.

Yes. Thanks very much for taking the questions. Two, please. The first one just on the field action and provision again. I just wondered, Frans, if you'd kindly confirm that the issues detected were not informed by any FDA inspection warning letter or 4a3 form? Furthermore, is it your working assumption that those sorts of warnings or observations of manufacturing plants will not unfold as a result of this? The second question please just relates to Oral Care. I know that you had - are on a mid single-digit growth this quarter, I would have thought that that business would have performed better given that the rest of the business has been rebounding. The comp was I think high single-digit negative last year and you're in quite meaningful product loan cycle. So, I wonder if you can confirm is there any softness in the end market demand or anything we should be aware of for that particular business. Thanks.

Yes. Hi, Scott. I can confirm that the field action originate out of the user reports and tests that we did ourselves and that there is no regulatory origin in that. The Pittsburgh or the Marysville - Marysville close to Pittsburgh is where the business unit is and the factory is has a good record with regards to prior inspections. And other than that, I cannot anticipate what will be future discussions. But I feel that we are taking appropriate and proactive action fully in line with our quality management system. And Abhijit will answer the second question.

Yes. I think overall Oral Healthcare demand was good. China recovery, as we had said last time, for Oral Healthcare will start from Q2. So, actually we will - we are gearing up for a much stronger Q2 in Oral Healthcare. But for the rest of the world. It was strong. So, it was more the China recovery and the launches in China have taken place at the flag end of Q1. So from Q2 onwards, you will see a better momentum, Scott.

That's very helpful. Thanks. And If I can, just one quick non-related follow up also for Abhijit, please. And again congratulations on the disposal of Domestic Appliances. I think previously, Abhijit, you'd highlighted an expectation of some ongoing royalties as a result of this separation. Now that you've concluded the deal, can you just highlight how those royalties will flow through? What sort of magnitude one should expect? Thank you.

Yes. Typically we cannot disclose separate royalty agreements with each of our partners. So I think the way you should look at it is for this year, we will compensate for the standard cost and then from next year, it will be a bit of a add-on but it's part let's say of the overall guidance. So, I think that's how you should look at it for now.

The next question comes from Julien Dormois from Exane BNP Paribas. Please state your question.

Good morning, Frans. Good morning, Abhijit. Thanks for squeezing me in. I'm left with two questions. The first one relates on the - relates to the order book, which was at 11% in D&T overall. You mentioned strong double-digit growth in IGT. So, I was just wondering whether you could be - shed more light on the actual growth in the order intake for imaging specifically and that's obviously in the context of maybe some slowdown that we saw in CapEx spending from listed hospital groups in the U.S. and also all the discussions around stimulus money for Europe. So, just curious to get more color on that side, please. And the second question is related to M&A. Once you get the cash for DA, the leverage will be back to a relatively low level. So, how should we think about your appetite for more deals in the short term or are you happy in the next few months to digest the recent acquisitions and the divestment from DA?

Yes. Hi Julien. Let me unpack a bit the Diagnosis & Treatment order book. Of course last year we already saw strong traction on computed tomography in diagnostic Imaging, right, so the compare for Precision Diagnosis is a bit tougher than the compare for IGT. Okay. So, the 11% is strong double-digit for IGT driven by first of all North America, then Europe and China more or less ex equal also with mid single-digit growth. Then Precision Diagnosis given that last year we saw a lot of computed tomography orders, this year the kind of mid to high single-digit order growth in PD is driven first of all by China, then by basically Europe and other markets, notably North America is still quite modest on Precision Diagnosis also because last year we saw there quite some good performance. Then yes, and Abhijit just gives me two data points that order growth last year on CT and general X-ray was over 30%. So, that just gives a little bit of color on that difficult compare with only MRI being soft last year. And now if you look at the mix, MRI is actually the star together with cardiovascular ultrasound, again which is very logical because with the resumption of elective procedures, the interest to spend money on cardiovascular equipment is back, which is also a positive. So, I think that explains the nature of the order book. So, I'm happy to see that China is really performing well. With all the discussions of course always about local competition, Philips is holding its ground very well. And then the DA cash, yes, let me not go over that. Look, you could of course argue that much of the cash we have just spent on BioTelemetry and Capsule, but you kindly reminded us about the balance sheet and the state of it, which will be great. Let's just say that it puts us in a comfortable position with the ability to do a further report on. We don't have to because Abhijit went to great lengths to discuss our organic growth opportunity. Our normal guidance for next year is 5% to 6% across the board in all segments. Moreover on top of that, you get the contribution of BioTelemetry and Capsule, which are both growing above the average of Philips. So, that's also good news. We are not in a hurry to spend our cash. We are quite comfortable to keep the balance sheet then for a while with a leverage in the guided range.

The next question comes from Falko Friedrichs from Deutsche Bank. Please state your question.

Two quick questions, please. Firstly, on this ongoing semiconductor supply shortage. Could you share some color on how this could impact your business throughout the year and to what extent that is baked into the guidance you gave us today. And then secondly, out of interest with regard to Connected Care. What are you still seeing in terms of demand for hospital ventilators especially in light of these rising hospital admissions again in several countries across the world?

Yes. Hi Falko. The semiconductor market is certainly a concern to us. We have near-term demand well organized yet we are seeing of course an increase of revenue. Therefore, we are increasing our own plans and put more requirements on the semi industry in terms of supplies. So far we have been able to handle that well with the exception of defibrillators where we saw already some tightness in Q1 and in Q2. Other than that, for now we are navigating this scarcity situation and we hope that we can continue to do that. We are not baking in big constraints going forward. Then on defense demand, of course last year we had the peak. We're still seeing pockets of demand across the world and we are doing whatever we can to help with those critical care requirements. For example in India where we have been able to alleviate some of the most pressing needs both for ventilators as well as for oxygen concentrators where even with Abhijit's personal intervention, several flights out of the U.S. with cargo take over 10,000 concentrators into India to help remediate the most pressing shortages over there. Nevertheless if you add it all up, then hospital ventilation this year is much lower than last year and that's just math, cannot be avoided. For monitors, we were - you heard us with a much more positive story because we expect demand for monitoring to go wider and even outside of the home and therefore it's much more the trend whereas ventilation was more of a one-time peak.

Our next question comes from Sezgi Oezener from HSBC. Please state your question.

Hi, thanks very much for taking my question - questions and thanks for all the information. Just one question. Given that most of the production savings program have delivered a lot of results since 2017 and given the tightness in the market not only semiconductor market, but also a lot of the supplier tightness that we've seen recently; how much further scope do you see for further productivity gains within 2021 and beyond?

Sezgi, let me first welcome you to this call. Great to have you as an analyst for HSBC in following Philips. So, I really appreciate that. Abhijit, this first question is something for you.

Yes. I think we guided for €2 billion up to 2024 - 2025 sorry so at this stage, we continue to track to that program. Typically we have done a little bit more, but I think that is par for the course over the next five years. But at this point in time, we report on net productivity so we therefore whatever price increases come, we have to offset that. So we will not increase that guidance, but we constantly work to look at bigger opportunities to compensate for newer headwinds that come up like the ones you mentioned. But right now, we want to deliver on the €2 billion program that we had set out last year.

All right. And just as a small follow-up. Can you comment or like guide about the increased R&D expenses that we have seen this quarter. I mean should we assume a correction in the rest of the year and what kind of a trajectory?

I think the R&D increase in the quarter may have to do with the impairment that we have taken. So, let us come back to you. There is no significant increase in the overall R&D spend for the year. So, maybe I will give you the adjusted number for the restructuring and then we should be okay. We are in a good trajectory there.

The next question comes from Daniel Wendorff from Commerzbank. Please state your question.

Yes. Good morning and thanks for taking my questions. The first one is a follow-up really on Diagnostic Imaging, How would you see the underlying market develop there normally excluding the corona related effects, the positives you highlighted from last year and also from this year? So, there will be underlying market development. And then a more bigger picture question. If you look at your product offering in patient monitoring; outpatient, inpatients including all the software-related products you have on offer there. How do you see that competitive environment develop? I would assume that this is rather limited and in the most important regions of the world. Any more color you could provide would be helpful. Thank you.

Yes. Hi, Daniel. Diagnostic imaging market, globally we would classify as low to mid-single digit with more strength in China and low single digit in mature markets like U.S. and Europe. Installed base is pretty old so there is a need for renewal regardless actually of the CapEx situations. Hospitals have been postponing this for a while and there's real need to make step-ups. China's strength relates also to government interventions with - towards diagnostic centers. With the influx of monetary support in the Biden administration and in Europe towards hospitals, we can actually expect some acceleration in the DI market space with more room for CapEx than maybe was previously assumed. So, I see a slight positive trend emerging. Even though on the question of I think it was Julien to give more color on the order book, I think I said that on Diagnostic Imaging the U.S. was still the lowest of all the regions. But I see a general trend that is moving in a positive direction and we'll see. We'll certainly update you again in Q2 in July if that trend is continuing. For now, as you know, we have updated our growth guidance for Philips and much of that is also driven by Diagnosis & Treatment and therefore by DI also. On the patient monitoring offering, we pride ourselves in being the market leader and having also the widest approach and platform approach whereby we think it's all about the data and processing the data and turning that into actionable insights as opposed to just offering a box. And I think we have taken some distance from competition in that context. I don't claim that we are the only one. But the more complex the systems become, in fact the better it is for us. So, we take a solutions approach to monitoring. We've also started to offer monitoring as a service thereby moving away from a kind of a discrete CapEx and call for tender situation towards a more continuous upgrading approach to hospitals. Time will tell how fast that goes, but initial reception is very positive.

Due to time, the last question is a follow-up from Michael Jungling from Morgan Stanley. Please state your question.

Thank you for this. I have a question on ultrasound. If there was a sizable ultrasound business up for sale, would you be interested to further expand your market leading business and does your current market share actually allow this? Thank you.

Yes. I love hypothetical questions, Michael. As you know, our strength foremost is in cardiovascular ultrasound and there we are Number 1. In other areas such as general or point-of-care ultrasound, we are much lower. So if opportunities would arise potentially we would look at it, but we do have to worry around kind of anti-trust approval. So, it is not - would not be a slam dunk.

Okay, great. Thank you.

You're welcome. All right. Back to you. Leandro.

Thank you. I think that concludes the call. That was the last question.

Okay. Well, I appreciate very much everybody dialing in. We are slated for a good future with increasing momentum. Makes us very happy and we will keep you posted as we go. Thanks.

This concludes the Royal Philips first quarter 2021 results conference call on Monday, April 26, 2021. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.