Mario Schlosser
Analyst · Bank of America. Your line is open.
Yeah, Adam. I'd say a couple different thoughts on this one. One is, we now have several different business lines that are growing. [Indiscernible] plus Oscar deals and so on. So I do think we are diversifying ourselves in a sense there, that helps. The second point, [Indiscernible], if you're looking for a company that has maybe had the highest volatility of regulatory environments, it might just be us. Over the last few years, we have lived through so many cycles of ACA on, ACA off. I can't even count them anymore. What we have generally believed, and I think it has proven not to be true, is that a benefits like now ensuring 50 million-plus people, it's very, very unlikely to get the clock turned back on. And so in some shape or form, shape or form I would very strong believe that these subsidies will remain in place or will be replaced by similar subsidies under different names perhaps. That's generally what we're assuming there, however, we have also lived through cycles. Plenty of them where silver loading happens and some CSR subsidies were repeat years and things like that. And we have followed through them and it's always improved throughout these cycles, which makes me very confident that if somehow we have to deal with some appeal over there, we certainly could. I think a final point there is that we've been building our platform internally partly because we want to be able to react quickly. If there is a regulatory change, like, for example, more testing reimbursements, that we can flip a couple of switches and very quickly react to it, and fly through it, really, and I think that the same applies here. And if there's new regulation, we'll adapt to it quickly. And the inevitable march of the healthcare system towards more consumerization, I don't think would be stopped by any of what might come our way there.