Good morning, and welcome to Newell Rubbermaid's Third Quarter 2012 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, today's conference is being recorded. A live webcast of this call is available at newellrubbermaid.com on the Investor Relations homepage, under Events and Presentations. A slide presentation is also available for download. I will now turn the call over to Nancy O'Donnell, Vice President of Investor Relations. Ms. O'Donnell, you may begin.

Thanks, Mackenzie. Good morning. Welcome to our Third Quarter 2012 Earnings Call. With me this morning are Newell Rubbermaid's President and CEO, Mike Polk; and Doug Martin, our Executive VP and CFO. Let me remind you that as we conduct this call, we will be making forward-looking statements. These statements are made on the basis of our views and assumptions as of this time and are not guarantees of performance. Risk factors that may impact these statements are discussed in the Risk Factors section of our latest annual report on Form 10-K and in today's earnings release. Our press release and this call also contain certain non-GAAP financial measures including, but not limited to, normalized operating margin and normalized earnings per share. A full reconciliation with the corresponding GAAP measures is provided in our earnings release and is available on the Investor Relations section at newellrubbermaid.com. Thanks, and now I'll turn it over to Mike.

Thank you, Nancy. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining our call. We have 3 objectives this morning. First, we'll review our third quarter results and provide our outlook for the remainder of the year. Second, we'll discuss the announced expansion of Project Renewal and the 5 new work streams that will accelerate our transformation. And third, we'll discuss the significant change in our organization design in my leadership team that will enable us to unlock the upside of the Growth Game Plan. This new organization design aligns our resources to our 2 key activity systems, the work we do to develop our brands and categories, and the work we do to ensure best-in-class execution and delivery. The new organization and leadership we've announced is designed to strengthen our business on both dimensions and lead to accelerated performance. Our track record of solid results and our demonstrated ability to drive delivery, while simultaneously driving change, gives us the confidence to now accelerate the pace of change to more quickly realize our ambition of becoming a bigger, faster-growing, more global, more profitable Newell Rubbermaid. A sign of our strength in performance and growing confidence is this morning's announcement of a 50% increase in our dividend, a step change that takes us to the high end of our stated dividend payout ratio target range of 30% to 35%. This is the second dividend increase we've announced this year and the third in the last 2 years, which reflects the board's confidence in the company's strong cash generation ability and in the potential of our Growth Game Plan. Our new annualized dividend of $0.60 per share is up from $0.20 a share at the beginning of 2011, and now reflects a dividend yield of nearly 3% at yesterday's share price. There's a lot…

Thanks, Mike, and good morning, everyone. I'll spend the next few minutes covering our third quarter results and our outlook for the year. After that, I'll walk you through some of the details on the expansion of Project Renewal. I'm going to start with Q3. Total company recorded net sales for the quarter were $1.54 billion, a 0.9% decrease versus the prior year, with core sales increasing 1.5%, excluding 240 basis points of unfavorable foreign currency. Reported net sales in our Consumer segment decreased 2.1%. Core sales, which exclude 170 basis points of negative currency, fell 0.4%, representing a sequential improvement from our first half results. Normalized operating margin for this segment increased 180 basis points to 17.3%, with price and productivity driving improved gross margins and the deferral of certain brand-building investments from Q3 into Q4 contributing to lower SG&A. In our Professional segment, Q3 reported net sales declined 1.1%, with core sales, which exclude 360 basis points of unfavorable currency, increasing by 2.5%. Operating margin declined 240 basis points to 13.2%. This reflects our investment in marketing activity around our Irwin National Tradesmen Day, as well as strategic sales force and feet on the street initiatives intended to drive future growth. In our Baby segment, Q3 reported net sales rose 5.2%, with core sales, which exclude 260 basis points of negative currency, increasing by 7.8%. Q3 normalized operating margin was essentially flat to last year at 9.9%. Looking at our Q3 sales by geography. North America core sales grew 1.1%, led by the Baby & Parenting and Professional segments, which were collectively up 4.7%. In EMEA, core sales declined 2.8%, slightly better than the SAP adjusted run rate for the past several quarters, but still reflecting ongoing macroeconomic weakness in Western Europe. We're getting good growth, however, in…

Thanks, Doug. As I said earlier, today, we're launching a major transformation of the company, design to drive the Growth Game Plan into action more boldly and more rapidly. Over the next couple of years, we will both simplify and enhance the way we do business to accelerate our drive to make Newell Rubbermaid a bigger, faster-growing, more global, more profitable company. This morning, we announced a new organization model and strengthened leadership, including top outside appointments to my executive team. We are reorganizing the company around the first 2 pillars of our Growth Game Plan, brand and category development, where we strive to make our brands really matter; and best-in-class execution and delivery, where we're building an execution powerhouse. The new development organization will be accountable for building big brand ideas, high-impact, disruptive innovation and a true point of difference through superior design and product experience. All of the company's marketing, insight, design, R&D and corporate development talent will be part of the new development organization. The new delivery organization will be accountable for P&L management and delivering the maximum commercial value from the growth ideas built by the development organization. The delivery team will place much greater emphasis on building true strategic partnerships with our customers and suppliers, optimizing supply chain efficiencies across the company, while also building our go-to-market capabilities in the emerging markets. All of the company's general management, supply chain, customer and channel development talent will be part of the new delivery organization. I'm confident this new model will strengthen our performance. When I joined Unilever in 2003, that organization looked very much like our current Newell Rubbermaid structure. In 2006, we deployed a similar organization model to the one we've announced at Newell today. I held top leadership roles in both the delivery and…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Connie Maneaty from BMO Capital Markets.

So on these 5 streams, can you allocate the percentage of savings you expect to get from the each one of them?

Connie, this is Doug. We will be giving more color on the total Project Renewal restructuring or the expansion pieces of it on the call in January.

Okay. And then what about the timing of the cost and the savings? I mean, it says throughout the life of the program. But it seems like a lot of the change has been made now, the new reporting structure happens right around the corner. So can you give us a little color on that?

Yes, that will be some of the changes will be happening, the ones that Mike mentioned. It's a relatively small piece of the total, though, that will happen in the next couple of months between now and year end. Most of the activity will begin occurring beginning in the second quarter of next year, and then the different work streams will roll out after that. Again, we'll give you a little more color on that as we get into January timeframe. But I'd remind you that we do intend to reinvest these savings in the business as they're generated to further drive growth.

Connie, just want to build on that. The structural change at the top happens immediately. And so within the -- certainly, my direct reports, that change will happen -- happens effective today. Some of the folks will start to report later in the fourth quarter into the beginning of next year. But we're going to get on with that structure. And in fact, we're meeting later this afternoon with the -- in the global webcast to dimensionalize that for folks. I think the people savings will skew towards the front end, some of the structural stuff that we need to do. The supply chain will be spread out over the duration, and that won't kick in -- the supply chain work won't kick in for a while. We need to give our new Chief Supply Chain Officer the opportunity to own some of those choices, although we've got a pretty clear view of what we need to go through. So you'll see the savings in the cost spread over that 2.5-year window with the organizational work done earlier and the structural supply chain work done later in that 2.5-year window.

Your next question comes from the line of Chris Ferrara from Bank of America.

So I guess, you guys are set up now with, call it, cumulatively $300 million in savings, which is like $0.75 a share on $1.70 earnings base, like 5 points of margin. I guess, the question is, with that $300 million number, I mean, can you bucket what the reinvestment could look like, right? Because given what you spend on things like R&D, on marketing, right, on your selling organization, it sounds like the reinvestment of that would be multiples of what you spend now, right? I'm just wondering if you could just provide a little color and insight just to help us kind of dimensionalize this stuff.

So, Chris, it is the key question that we are asking ourselves. How much of that flows in and how much of that flows to EPS? Clearly, the intent of -- behind doing this is to unlock the upside in the Growth Game Plan, which is all about shifting our SG&A dollars from structural cost to investment behind our brands. And we've said the majority of the spend will go into brand spending. We haven't said all of it will, however. So what this does for us is it releases the cost and gives us the opportunity to invest for faster growth and for the geographic expansion of our leading brands, at the same time, it's providing a greater line of sight to earnings and operating cash flow growth. So this is the key next step in unlocking the trapped capacity for growth, but also provides that line of sight. We won't spend money unless we're spending money behind ideas that are going to create growth. So I'm not -- and you've seen my behavior over the last 15 months. Money flows to ideas. And so it's really important for the new leadership structure that we've announced and for the new leadership team to get in here as quickly as possible and for us to really galvanize our -- around the set of choices that weren't good investment. Clearly, the portfolio role choices that we've made, the definition of our Win Bigger categories, the choice to, in the disciplined and deliberate way, build out our geographic footprint into a higher growth -- faster-growing emerging markets. Those will all be filters through which we make the choices of what to invest in. And so if you're looking -- as you get greater visibility into our business through the segment reporting we'll do, and as you're thinking about how you build your view forward, I would use those filters. I would apply a disproportionate amount of the investment against the Win Bigger businesses and the Win Bigger geographies, as Doug said. Now we're not going to provide quarterly guidance, and I do think you need to be careful in terms of how you think about the flow of savings into your models and into whatever you do with respect to your projections on EPS. Effectively, the flow of savings will mirror the flow of savings over the next 2.5 years will mirror the flow of savings over the last 12 months. The cost and the benefits over the next 2.5 years effectively are the same cost and benefits that we've experienced over the last 12 months with renewal, if you think about it. And that's, I think, in a broad sense, the way I would look at this with us investing only in the things that we believe in, believe will yield a sustainable growth return.

Just a reminder, Chris, as well, as we've generated savings this year from Project Renewal, we have begun investing in selling systems, and we've talked about that. So an increase -- and we've also increased strategic spend as we've gone throughout the year on a year-over-year basis by about 50 basis points. So you'll see that shift within SG&A.

But Chris, the things to look at in our portfolio that we'll bet on Writing, we'll bet on Commercial Products, we'll bet on Tools. Those are all our Win Bigger categories. We'll bet on Latin America and then -- because we believe that we need to develop our business south and east. And eventually, we'll bet on China and Southeast Asia. But we'll do it in a deliberate way, in a disciplined way that lives up to our commitment to also deliver steady operating income margin improvement.

Got it. And I guess, an unrelated follow-up. I mean, yes, I think, it's great, you got the payout ratio up to 35%. But looking ahead, right, that still leaves 65%. And I think you've said that tack-ons or acquisitions are really not what you're looking at right now. I mean, should we assume that buyback is really where the destination for the remainder of your cash generation?

Look, we believe in the Growth Game Plan. As I've said that over the last 12 months, the focus of the Growth Game Plan is on organic growth. But that over time, we will open our mind to bolt-on acquisitions that are focused strategically against our growth agenda. But now is not the right moment for us to be doing that. So as you look at our capital allocation strategy over a 5-year window, you shouldn't simply shut down that path to making Newell into a bigger, more profitable, faster-growing company. That said, there's nothing transformational out there, so we're going to have a lot of the interesting choices with respect to what to do with the unallocated cash that this business has the potential to generate. We've said our target payout ratio ranges in the 30% to 35%. We've been challenged by some. We think that's not competitive enough. I think Bill was the first one to put that to me a year ago, and we will have other options available to us with respect to providing returns to shareholders. Of course, choices like that are the board's choices. Management can make a recommendation, the board will make a call. And I think all of those avenues are open to us. And what's exciting about our company is the incredible crash-generative nature of the business and the opportunity we have to make even further progress on that front through attacking not just the trapped capacity for growth as it's measured in the P&L, but also the trapped capacity for growth that is measured through our working capital ratios.

Your next question comes from the line of Wendy Nicholson with Citi Research.

I wanted to follow up on that allocation of capital questions just for a minute. Because I know you have one of the lower dividend yields in the group, but you also have one of the lower multiples. So it surprises me, frankly, that even just year-to-date, we haven't seen more buybacks. You're kind of in that consistent $20 million to $25 million a quarter. And I guess the question is, does that belie some trepidation on your part in the consistency of the results? Do you think there's going to be a better buying opportunity out there? Or is this just a, hey, we kind of want to be consistent for now in terms of our allocation of the excess cash and just make share repurchases more of a regular thing, because I'm surprised you haven't been more aggressive on that front?

Yes, Wendy, this is Doug. I think it's the latter. And I think when you think about the overall -- our overall considerations for the use of cash, we're obviously funding our renewal programs. We are investing in CapEx then to continue to build out our growth opportunities and our core businesses. We have increased the dividend a couple of times over the last year to something that's consistent with the payout range we'd like to be in. And then we're going to execute our $300 million share repurchase plan on a relatively consistent basis.

Okay. And that leads me to looking into next year. And I as I go back to the Analyst Day and the 3 phases of your growth, I think next year is supposed to be in that strategic bucket, and the concept was earnings growth kind of in the 5% to 8% range. But I hear you talk about these actions unlocking the upside, if you will, in your growth plan. And I'm wondering, as we start to thinking about 2013, are you comfortable with all of us kind of going to the high end of the range? I know some of these cost savings take a couple of years to roll through. But are you feeling good enough about the business that we can migrate to the high end of that range in terms of thinking about earnings growth next year?

Wendy, it's Mike. I think you captured it right that we're just emerging into the strategic stage. The choices we're making today are designed, as I said, to unlock the upside. And what I mean by that is, we have an opportunity, if we move through this effectively, to pull the acceleration stage in closer to our current timetable. And I don't think '13 will materially change in terms of what we have to do as a company. '13 is always going to be the big transition year. That's why we're making these changes now to get the talent in here to really fill the funnel. So I don't think it materially impacts the long-term guidance we provided when we first laid out the Growth Game Plan in '13. The question becomes can we accelerate '15 into the tailwind of '14 or the second half of '14? And that's something we will work through over the coming number of months as we get the new leadership in place and we start to really focus our resources and channel them against the biggest impact agenda items we've got. So I think the promise of the upside probably comes a year beyond next, and we'll have to work through whether we can get that pulled forward by a full year or whether it's something less than that. But the language I use was very choice-full. And you're right, this restructuring enables us to accelerate the timeframe to get to the acceleration phase. And I think there's bound to be opportunity here. What's really nice about what we've chosen to do in the 5 work streams is we get a real quick payback on this. It's not materially different than what we have done in the first phase of renewal. And because of that, the effect on uncommitted cash over the 5-year windows is neutral. There's no difference in our uncommitted cash, having executed this program. So you fund it within that timeframe, and you're still left with $1.5 billion of uncommitted cash and increased borrowing capacity that we'll have the ability to do interesting things with. And again, we don't want to get specific about that now, but that will most likely involve a blend of both shareholder-friendly actions and more aggressive point of view on both on M&A.

Your next question comes from the line of Budd Bugatch with Raymond James. Budd Bugatch - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Pretty excited about some of the transformation, Mike, so congratulations on getting that. Wendy asked the question that I was going to ask about, whether the guidance for next year, the 3% to 4% sales, core sales growth and the 5% to 8% EPS growth, and where might be in that. So let me move onto my second question, which was, you did not name, or at least in the release, the heads of the operating units. So do we have any surprises in that? When will those be formally announced publicly?

They're being announced in the company today, so I'll share them with you now. I didn't want to put them into the press release until our people had the opportunity to hear it from us directly. There are 6 segment leads, 6 business segments that we're moving to. There are 6 business segment presidents that will be appointed -- have been appointed. We are combining Industrial Products & Services with Construction Tools & Accessories. And Rich Wuerthele, who currently runs IP&S, will lead the Combined Tools business. In Baby, Kristie Juster stays put. She's doing a great job in our Baby business, and we're really beginning to hit our stride there and, of course, we're not going to change anything in that place given the momentum we see building. In Home Solutions, which is the combination of Home Org & Style, GBU and Culinary, Jeff Hohler will lead the new Home Solutions business segment. In the combination of Tools and -- the Construction Tools & Accessories and Industrial Products & Services business, we will take the Hardware business and move it into our new segment called the Specialty segment, which will merge with our technology global business unit. David Klatt, who currently has responsibility for the Tech GBU, will assume responsibility for the new Specialty business segment. And Eduardo Senf, who currently runs our WACE business, Writing & Creative Expression, will assume responsibility for the Writing business segment. So those -- and then in the RCP and Commercial Products, we will -- we've appointed Neil Eibeler to continue to lead that business. So as you can see, we've got good continuity of leadership in those key roles. In the context of those changes, Ross Porter, who currently runs Construction Tools & Accessories, will be leaving the company. And as with Penny, Ted, Paul, I do want to thank Ross for his service and leadership over a number of years. He's had quite an impact. And when you make changes like this, good people end up leaving, and I'm optimistic and happy to help any one of these folks really land in key roles, because they're all really talented people and they've made significant contributions to getting us to this point. Budd Bugatch - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Congratulations to the folks that will lead those units, and I echo your sentiments about Ross. We in the investment community have had a long and valued relationship with Ross. So I hope he does well going forward. The last question I have is also organizational, because it looks like Europe is going to change markedly with your General Counsel running that. And I take it that the matrix level of that organization is going to be collapsed? Can you talk a little bit about how that's going to work? I think that's a good idea, but I'd like to understand and see that working.

Sure. So for those who didn't see the leadership announcement, John Stipancich, who is our Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel, will take over P&L responsibility for EMEA and lead the EMEA transformation through a group of European leaders that are on the ground. Gordon Scott, who is our sales lead in EMEA on the Consumer businesses, will become the General Manager of that geography. And it is the one area of the world that we will manage as a geography as we work through the transformation work stream because the critical enabler to unlocking the cost in Europe is to remove the complexity, whether that's SKU complexity or whether that's route-to-market complexity, or whether that's the nature of our go-to-market strategies in small countries across EMEA. And in order to do that, effectively and fast, you need to have somebody that's got accountability for making those choices. And if we were to leave the verticals in place in that geography while we were making the change, we didn't believe we would efficiently be able to make those complexity choices without a lot of cajoling and influencing. And so we're impatient in some ways with respect to unlocking the cost because we have places we want to spend the money for growth. And so we've asked John to step in to lead that work. John's background, John was -- before coming to Newell, involved in private equity, working at KKR & Co. And so he's got a lot of experience in leading transformation work of this sort. And so we've asked John to take the lead in driving that portion of our renewal expansion initiative into action.

Your next question comes from the line of Joe Altobello with Oppenheimer. Joseph Altobello - Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division: First question is on the expansion of renewal. It seems like over the last decade or so, I guess, one could argue that Newell has been in a state of restructuring or a non-stop state of restructuring and has been fairly restructured over that time. So how comfortable are you -- or how confident are you that you can effectively triple the size of the original renewal program? And then secondly, I assume the spending won't occur until the cost savings actually do materialized?

So Joe, great question. We've got a very good line of sight to each of the 5 work streams. These have been built bottoms up. We have more work to do before we make some final choices, particularly in the supply chain. But we've got a pretty good line of sight to the opportunities and the linkage of cost and benefit. The thing that needed to happen in order to enable us to go after this is the structural choice we've made this money. We had to reorganize and reset the organization structure to enable many of these costs to be accessible. And so things happen in a sequence for a reason. We've aligned the company's structure to the strategy. We've got SAP in place in the 80% of our revenue -- and in geographies representing 80% of our revenue today. Slightly more than that, quite frankly. So we've got visibility into complexity cost in the way that we've never had before. And so we have the opportunity now to pursue these -- the release of the cost. And so that's the logic for how and why we've done what we're doing and in what sequence. Your question about whether we can get $300 million -- cumulatively $300 million of benefit out of the cost structure of this company, and the answer clearly is yes. It's just going to take us time to do that and, of course, we have to balance the way we do that release of cost against the need to consistently deliver our commitments. And so of course, it's going to be the tension that's existed so far that will exist over the next 2.5 years, which is finding the balance between delivery and change, which, as I said, my team has proven to me that they can drive delivery and simultaneously drive change. And that gives me the confidence to really go more aggressively to go bolder and faster to reach for the transformation of the company. Joseph Altobello - Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division: Okay, that's helpful. And just secondly, on the cost savings you guys are looking for from indirect procurement, I think, the last time you had spoke, you mentioned that you're looking about $50 million of savings by the end of next year. Could you update us on that and where that stands at this point?

Sure, Joe. This is Doug. We're on track, continue to be on track for the $50 million. And this year, we are on track to deliver about $20 million of that. So we're well on our way. The teams are all engaged and are fully engaged in supporting the initiative and driving the savings that we're seeing. Joseph Altobello - Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division: Okay. Great. Just one last one if I could. The merchandising activity at J.C. Penny, obviously, has been a drag on you guys, in Décor in particular. And it sounds like you're hopeful that by next spring that will change or it will improve. How quickly would you expect to see some improvement from J.C. Penney?

Look, I think we're going to have a rough ride with JCP until they do their transition in late Q1 into Q2. It's really focused in our Décor and our Culinary business. And to the degree that they can get to the promised land, that could be very exciting for us. So we want to work with them to enable that. In the meantime, we're looking to build our businesses out such that we don't have to deal with such a headwind. Just for reference, through the end of Q3 year-to-date, our core sales globally, x Décor, would be up 3.5%. So that's the degree to which this problem has hurt us. So that's pretty solid performance in a really, really tough environment from a macro perspective. And I gave you some insight into Baby and Professional in North America, combined growing over 6%. So we've got many parts of our business performing very well right now and gives us encouragement that when we release cost and put some money behind these businesses, we should be able to see some benefit from that from a growth perspective. So the answer to your question is we're going to have to live with the Décor and the Culinary drags as a result of JCP right through that transition in the first half of 2013. But look, I'll take a longer view than this, and these choices are things we can control. I want to focus our new energy around building a really compelling innovation and brand growth agenda through the addition of talent we're bringing into the company and through the structural change we're making that will enable us to create focus, both on development and delivery. And if those 2 capabilities will work in an interdependent way and they're of equal stature, and they together will create a more vibrant future for us. And so our energy is going to that right now. We will work through the J.C. Penney issues in those 2 businesses. And like I said, if they can get to the promised land, that's a very exciting future for us, but it will be bumpy until then.

Your. Next question comes from the line of Linda Bolton-Weiser with Caris. Linda Bolton-Weiser - Caris & Company, Inc., Research Division: I was wondering if you could just remind us, I've kind of lost track here, of how much increase in strategic spending you are supposed to have in 2012? And if you think by the end of fourth quarter, we'll be -- you'll be ahead of that or kind of just in line with that or below? And also, you mentioned some shift of spending. Can you just elaborate on that? I think you said from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. And then my second question has to do with -- you had said that there was some weakness in Fine Writing kind of in the more mid-price point range. And can you just update us on that? Is that trend improving or is that kind of the same and remind us what geographies, was that just Europe or Europe and Asia? And then third question is have you given, right now, any thought as you've continued to look at the businesses and been longer at the company to divestitures? Are you happy with the potential future for each of the things? Or what's your current thought there?

Thank you. Thanks, Linda. Let me start with a couple of them, and I'll work back towards the SG&A question. So on Fine Writing Europe. As you recall, we shared with you on the last call the concerns we had on our Fine Writing business in Europe as a result of the macro pressure that business was feeling. This is the component of our Fine Writing portfolio that sits probably below $100 a pen. It's not a very high end of our business, which is growing beautifully. It's the area of our portfolio that's sort of caught in between Everyday Writing Instruments and the super premium end of that portfolio. And that was the segment of the portfolio in Europe that was under duress. It's also the segment of the portfolio in Europe that's distributed more through small stationery stores. And these guys are under pressure in this environment, and therefore, pulled back on the inventories or, in some cases, having a tough time financing those inventories. And so that business came under pressure in the first half of the year, and that dynamic continues with us. We've layered more support, more promotional support into the business in the second half of the year. And we'll continue to watch that and layer merchandising funding in to stabilize that business as we move into the fourth quarter. I don't want to play that lever too hard because everything we spent there is money that could be invested elsewhere in more strategic -- bigger strategic priorities. So we have to be careful about that. But our goal would be to stabilize that business until the macros turn in Europe by layering in the right merchandising support. On your question in general with respect to SG&A, we're right where we thought we'd be.…

Your next question comes from the line of Dara Mohsenian with Morgan Stanley.

So I was hoping to get a better sense of when we should expect to start seeing the top line payback from the higher spending. You talked about the line of sight on generating the savings, but can you expand on the line of sight to when the spending should actually start to materially boost your top line growth?

Well, as we said in the strategic guidance we provided in February, we would expect that acceleration to start to occur through the strategic phase into the acceleration phase. And so what needs to happen first is the release of cost so that we have the investment firepower to put that money behind our brands. As I just mentioned to Linda, the Décor problem this year aid into our capacity to invest behind brand. And have we had not that, you'd be seeing that investment happening already. But as we've said, we're not going to just spend without living up to our commitment to both accelerate growth and improve our operating income margin year in and year out. And so we begin to have greater clarity, greater line of sight to opportunities, and as the cost get released, we have the opportunity to layer those into brand-building investment, and you should expect us to start to do that, as we enter fourth quarter and into 2013. And you should expect to see our growth rates sequentially improve in '13 versus '12, as they have in '12 versus '11.

Okay. And then can you discuss if you're seeing or expect to see any demand benefit from a potential U.S. housing rebound? It sounded like market share were strong in the U.S. in the quarter, but I was hoping for a bit of an update on category growth, and maybe just a general update on macros around the world also.

Yes. I was asked that question this morning by a reporter on the macros. We haven't seen a material change in consumption patterns in North America. The biggest change we've experienced has been in Europe, and that continues to be a tough environment. Same time, we haven't seen sort of the housing-driven balance either. So we haven't seen the upside, the tailwind sort of move behind these businesses. We're winning because we're building market share. And the growth rates that I described for our Professional portfolio is a function of that in North America. So I look forward to the moment where the winds sort of pivot, but we haven't seen that yet. Our planning assumption for next year is that we've got more of the same. We haven't assumed a material change either way. I think from a consumer perspective, that's probably the right assumption to make irrespective of whether we go off the cliff or not. There may be a 90-day wobble in Q1, if in fact we do, with all the media headlines. But strategically, I don't think that is as much of a risk as perhaps retailer response to that dynamic playing out. That's where we get the volatility, more so than in the consumer dynamics. We will have an interesting challenge in the first half of next year because, as you know, summer occurred earlier, at least, in the eastern half of the country last year, which certainly helped our Professional portfolio. But I don't think there's -- we're not experiencing any material impact of the macro shifts on our business. Look at our emerging growth rate at 12% roughly year-to-date. We've all seen the GDP headlines out of China and out of Brazil. But given where we start from, slightly less than $1 billion business, which an absolute sizable, but relative to the market, a huge opportunity. The GDP dynamics in emerging markets aren't really a factor. It's more of what we do and how much we invest to deploy the portions of our portfolio we intend to develop in those geographies than any other macro impacts.

Okay. And so core sales be at the low end of your range for the full year, that's more home Décor than macros causing some downside at this point?

It's the macros in EMEA than it's Décor. And I think that those are the things that caused us to be at the low end of the range. And we have a tough -- and we're starting to lap growth. So we've got to grow on growth. But we're 3.5% year-to-date without Décor in the mix. And I don't like to do the withs and withouts, so the reality is we're at Q2. And I think we'll be hard pressed to get above the midpoint in our full year guidance range without some big change in the environment. So I think we've said, the -- we have a clear line of sight to the top of our EPS range. But given the environment, we're sort of in the bottom of our -- bottom half of our core sales range.

Your next question comes from the line of Bill Schmitz with Deutsche Bank.

Is there sort of any way you're gauging the effectiveness of some of these investments in emerging markets? I mean, there aren't systems in yet to sort of get an early read on sort of what the payback has been so far. And then if you could just give us the sales to date for renewal?

The sales to date or the savings to date?

Sorry, yes, savings to date.

Yes. I'll let Doug answer the savings-to-date question. This is how we're measuring the investments in -- the renewal investments in Latin America. I'm looking at growth rates. And I look at growth rates, the return on the sales investments in terms of the growth yield we're getting in those geographies. So I'm not looking at it from a financial metric perspective. I'm looking for a specific investment yield in those specific geographies. I've got to look at that in aggregate across the total company. And we're seeing good growth in Latin America by country. So even with the GDP slowdown in Brazil, we've got good numbers coming out of that part of the world and strong double-digit growth in those geographies. And that is a function of getting broader coverage. And so when we complement that with good brand investment and we get to building our brands in the sustainable way, we're going to have a nice financial return on those investments. But it will take a longer -- it's a longer period of time, Bill. It's not something that I actually want to even measure in sort of on annualized basis, the financial return. The growth yield, absolutely. Are we doing it strategically? Absolutely. Are we building our market share from a brand perspective? Yes, we've got to measure that. Do consumers -- what does brand health look like behind those brands? Do we need to measure that? Absolutely. That's the kind of dashboard that we look at.

Got you. And, Doug, do you have that savings-to-date number?

Yes. I do, Bill. The year-to-date number is about $0.10. And the program to date, because we had a little bit occurred on the fourth quarter last year, is about $0.11.

And then Mike, we all know you're a very persuasive guy. Can you just give some more color on how you got all these folks to come over? And then maybe if there's any changes to the incentive compensation metrics as you kind of change the strategic direction of the company.

Look, I mean, these guys saw the opportunity inherent in the business. All I had to do is show them a couple of charts.

Can I see those charts?

Yes, yes. It's on the Analyst Day. It was that cash chart, and that was to see the essential on that one, the one that talks about our unallocated cash and the increased borrowing capacity. And then, the fact that the brand portfolio is so concentrated. You've got 14 brands that represent 85% of our revenue stream. And these are not brands that are in their twilight. These are strong brands with great light in equity. And so with the right investment of energy and insight, we can really create something powerful with that brand portfolio. And then, you want to work with people you like. So I don't know, maybe that's a factor.

The incentive compensation, isn't it going to be changed in the way sort of people are paid?

No. We are -- we continue to -- I want to put more emphasis over time on the long-term components of our comp. But the metrics we're looking at are going to stay the same. We'll focus on core sales growth, we'll focus on EPS delivery and we'll focus on cash. And then from a long-term perspective, we're looking -- we get comped, all of us, on relative TSR. So I think those are the right metrics in the business. And if we -- if I had a wish, it's that we push more the total direct compensation towards the long-term incentive component of things, because I believe that, that's the best way for our employees to share in the value creation story related to the Growth Game Plan. And I think that while it's a little bit more of a long-term payout, then perhaps they're historically used to, I think it's the right perspective to have and it's the best way that they can create wealth for their family. So I'm encouraging the board to think that way, and I definitely talk our employees about our business that way.

Great. Then just one quick follow-up. Typically a good back-to-school correlates to a very good Christmas. Is there any reason to believe that it's not going to be the case this year?

Look, we're hopeful. We're launching Sharpie Metallics and we're putting money behind it. It's part of what we'll get brand investments. And we've got a really cool thing going on, on Sharpie also, with respect to our music partnerships. And we get the full core benefit of InkJoy in the marketplace in North America. So we have good things going on in the business. I wish -- I said to the board the other day, the impact of this Décor thing is really pretty profound. And have we not had not that issue, we'd be in a very different place. But we got to live with that, and we're going to live with that right into 2013. And if we take this new structure, and we work it really hard, we should start to see some benefits as we get out there into '14 and beyond.

Your next question comes from the line of John Faucher with JPMorgan. John A. Faucher - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: So 2 questions about the structure, the new GBU structure. The first would be -- I mean, you talked about 14 brands, and is 6 GBUs seems like a lot for sort of 14 core brands? And then secondly, was there any thought, given the aligning the structure from a geographic standpoint instead of a GBU standpoint, given the need to focus on the emerging markets businesses?

Well, John, I like having our structure, our P&L ownership vertical by category basically. It makes the interface between those first 2 pillars much easier to manage. So you've got a development owner and a category owner that are both global in nature. One of the complexities in my former company is that you have to marry a category owner up to 20 multi-country geography owners. And that gets very complicated and expensive. So we're not the type of company that can afford to have all those interfaces. So I think this is the right structure for us. We've made a different choice in EMEA for a different reason, which is related to the complexity issue that I raised. But you know what? I don't know what we'll look like 5 years from now. There's any number of possibilities. And for the next period of time, though, this is the right structure for us. It's the most efficient way for us to make the biggest impact.

Your next question comes from the line of Jason Gere with RBC.

Just a couple of minor things. One, I guess, as we think about 2013 and kind of the step-up in core sales from maybe where you'll end this year and known that Décor is going to weigh down. I guess, can you just talk about the relevance of the innovation pipeline you see for '13 relevant to what's out there for '12? So that's the first question. And then the second question, just maybe a little bit more color on the SKU rationalization, maybe where you see some of the bigger opportunities, obviously, not going into specific brands. But if you could talk maybe Consumer versus Professional versus Baby, a little bit more color on that angle.

Yes. In terms of innovation funnel, I actually we've got a pretty good funnel coming forward, both of items that are rolling out of '12 into '13 and new things that we're doing. Some of which I can talk about. Some of which you'll have to wait to talk about until our next call. And it's pretty balanced with good activity in Writing, a very good plan in Baby. We have an excellent selling of our new items for '13 on Baby in the U.S., in Europe, which is new news, which will help. And also, we've got some of the exciting things happening in the Professional business that I can't talk about right now. Plus, we've got some geographic deployment opportunities that we will pursue in '13, which again, I don't want to get specific on yet, but also offer some really interesting opportunity largely in the Professional category. So as I think about the growth levers we've got for next year, those are in round terms, the brand innovation or portfolio deployment components of it. We have as much opportunity in strengthening our delivery as we do in strengthening our development pipeline. And there's as much creativity and joy to be had in building the right assortment by channel and creating strategic partnerships and stripping complexity out of the enterprise-wide value chain from our retailers' cash register back through our supplier interfaces. And that work, which will be the work of the delivery organization, can each both release cost but also drive growth. And I'm as excited about those opportunities, in the channel development opportunities we had, as I am about the innovation opportunities we've got. With respect to the specificity you're looking for on complexity reduction in Europe, there's really 3 levels to this. There's the SKU complexity that you've talked about. And I think there's opportunities in probably our biggest businesses there, which are Writing business and our Tools businesses. But we have to be very careful about that. There's equally opportunity to play for different route-to-market models, depending on geographies. So we have the complexity and the cost associated with a very broad EMEA geographic footprint, but not very big businesses in some geographies. And of course, you want to sustain those businesses, but there's a more efficient way to deliver those revenues through management of our route-to-market systems in a more synergistic way, and that's a different type of complexity. So without getting too specific, but you get the sense for those types of opportunities we'll pursue. John's all over this with the support of the European team and also with some help from the outside.

Your next question comes from the line of Sarah Miller with SunTrust.

I'm on the call today for Bill. But I guess, one last question that we had was, could you provide any more color around the Baby business? I know you mentioned that a lot of your growth in the U.S. was coming more from market share gains. But just if we can get some more color around the overall category, whether you see a lift coming any time soon, both in the U.S. and other geographies?

Sarah, the headlines on Baby are generally pretty positive. We've strengthened our customer partnerships in the U.S. We've got better innovation on Graco this year. We have lapped the step-up in growth in Aprica in Japan, which occurred in Q2 of 2011, and we're sustaining good double-digit growth in Japan on Aprica. We do see some competitive activity picking up in Japan now. So there'll be some challenges there in terms of sustaining that rate of growth, but pretty good performance. The business in Europe has had challenges. And so as we look forward to '13, we're bringing in new innovation platform to market there, which should strengthen the Graco performance in Europe. And we're hopeful that our business stabilizes there. We feel good about the innovation sell-in for 2013 in the U.S. And we're hopeful that we can sustain the growth we're currently experiencing on top of year-ago growth in North America, which we have yet to lap until the fourth quarter of 2012. So Q4 will be the real test for the underlying forward-looking momentum in the Baby business in the U.S., Q4 and Q1. And we're well staged to be able to sustain certainly more than competitive levels of growth.

Your final question comes from the line of Lee First [ph] with Wellington Shield.

I'm interested in hearing more about your go to market. I think you've already implemented One Newell sales force. And I was wondering if you could give us examples of success there already and then what kind of changes do you see going forward.

We've -- Lee, as you know, we -- in April of this year, we really rolled out the customer -- the new customer development organization in the U.S. that on the Consumer side of the business took our sales structures from a disaggregated model, where they were in bed -- our sales force was in bed within each GBU and pulled them to the center to -- and organized our field selling teams around customers and channels. And we began to see some impact from that, particularly in the Consumer business, in -- which is where the change was made in late Q3. And I would expect that momentum to continue to build going into Q4 and into the first half of the year. We're seeing great progress with respect to penetrating new customers, which was part of the design ambition. And we're seeing early progress with respect to broadening our distribution footprint. But I wouldn't be objective if I didn't tell you that I think there's a lot more opportunity for us to go after. One of the powerful things about our new organization structure and having it focused around development and delivery is that more energy and more emphasis will go into the development of the right assortment for the right channels, the right pricing strategies, the right merchandising frequencies, the right merchandising vehicles and the right channel penetration strategies for each one of these businesses. If you're a general manager or a segment president in this new model, that's where a good chunk of your energy is going to go in the future. And so having now put the CDO in place, we have the opportunity to leverage it through this new structure more completely. And it was done in that sequence for a reason. You needed…

Are there any examples of success so far that you can share with us?

We've talked about the Office Depot partnership on Rubbermaid Consumer, talked about broadening our portfolio of footprint through our Toys "R" Us relationship to include more than Baby on the toy side of that partnership. We're seeing expansion on our food and beverage Rubbermaid portfolio into the food, drug and mass channel. And so there's a long list. And I'll be happy when we have less strategic things to talk about to lay that out. It's a good challenge, Lee. I mean, if we're not clearly communicating all the wins we're getting, I'll make sure to take some time on our January call to dimensionalize that for you.

And on the emerging markets, it sounds like you're focusing on Latin America. Could you just quickly clarify what your strategy is there in the long term and short term?

As we said, we are going to invest behind the Win Bigger businesses and our Win Bigger geographies. The Win Bigger businesses are Tools, Professional Writing and Commercial Products. And all of those businesses have footprints in Latin America. So we are going to leverage those geographies for expanded brand presence and growth. And at the same time, take the same portfolio to Asia. And so geographically, our focus point in Latin America is 3 hubs, Mexico, Columbia and Andina [ph] in Brazil. And those 3 countries will serve as platforms for growth across the total Latin American landscape. In Asia, the prize is in China. We got a foothold there in Fine Writing and the Industrial Products & Services. We've moved talent to our new office in Shanghai to help develop our Rubbermaid Commercial Products business, and we will continue to do so to unlock the opportunity in China and also across Southeast Asia.

This concludes our question-and-answer period. If we were unable to get to your question, please call the Investor Relations team at (770) 418-7075. I will now turn the call back to Mr. Polk for any concluding remarks.

Well, thanks for the questions, and thanks for sticking with us through a very complex and complete set of announcements this morning. We've covered a lot of ground. Once again, let me summarize. We've delivered a solid set of results and are well on our way to delivering our full year guidance across all 4 of our full year guidance metrics. We've announced a significant 50% increase in our quarterly dividend that brings us to the high end of our targeted dividend payout ratio range. With the on-time and in-full completion of the first phase of Project Renewal right around the corner in the first half of 2013, we've announced the expansion of Project Renewal. And that expansion has 5 new work streams that will, by the middle of 2015, generate $180 million to $225 million of incremental savings over that 2.5-year period. We've announced a new organization structure that's simpler and flatter, that reorganizes the company around the first 2 pillars of the Growth Game Plan, and our structure is now aligned to our strategy. And we've appointed a new Newell executive team with a tremendous blend of top talent from both within Newell Rubbermaid and from the outside. And so it's a very exciting moment for our company. This is the pivot where we start to drive the Growth Game Plan into action. We launched the Growth Game Plan in February. We initiated the first round of renewal changes in November to bridge to this moment. And now we take a bigger swing at both cost and releasing the trapped capacity for growth, but perhaps, more importantly, building out an organization model and a new team that has the potential to drive the company towards the acceleration stage of the Growth Game Plan, with the ambition of building a bigger, faster-growing, more global, more profitable Newell Rubbermaid. So with that, thanks for your questions and your support, and we'll talk to you soon.

Today's call will be available on the web at newellrubbermaid.com and on digital replay at (800) 585-8367 or (855) 859-2056, with an access code of 39786031, starting 2 hours following the end of today's call. This concludes our conference. You may now disconnect.