Glynis Bryan
Analyst · Raymond James. Sir, your line is now open
Thank you, Ken. Beginning on slide eight. Ken covered the key highlights of our very excellent first quarter results. So I’ll use my time to update you on other matters. Our effective tax rate in the first quarter was 26%, similar to the rate reported in the first quarter of last year. In the first quarter of last year, we reported $2 million of tax benefit on settlement of employee share based awards in accordance with the new accounting standard. For the quarter - for the current quarter, our rate reflects US federal tax reform enacted in late 2017, and the related impact on State income taxes and limitations on deductibility of certain operating expenses and interest expense. For the balance of 2018, we expect our expected tax rate will be between 26% to 27%. Also, our results in the first quarter included the effect of acceleration of certain partner incentives into Q1 that would normally be earned over the full year. We earned them fully in Q1 due to changes to the program, and estimate that the accelerated Q1 benefit was approximately $5 million. This acceleration was a significant driver of EMEA’s performance in Q1. As we noted earlier, we adopted ACS 606 effective January 1, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis. This means that we have not restated the 2017 results presented in our materials today. In our 10-Q to be released earlier this week - later this week, we will provide a reconciliation from the results under the new 606 rules to the previously used accounting methodology. Moving on to Slide nine. As expected, the adoption of ACS 606 did not have a material effect on our top or bottom line results reported in the quarter. However, the impact on certain balance sheet items was more notable. In particular, after all the puts and takes associated with ACS 606, accounts receivable increased $81 million, while net sales increased only $12 million, due to increased sales reported net, which is affecting our DSO calculation for Q1, and is expected to have a similar effect on this metric for the balance of the year. With respect to our cash flow metrics overall, our cash conversion cycle was 35 days in the first quarter of 2018, up six days year over year as a result of higher DSO of four days, and approximately one day each in DPO and DIO. Just as - as just discussed, the increase in DSO was primarily due to the impact of ACS 606 in our results for the first quarter of this year, compared to the prior year. Operationally, we’re very pleased with the decrease we drove in aged accounts receivable balances, which reflect our Q1 cash flow - which is reflected in our Q1 cash flow generation, and we will continue our efforts to reduce those balances over the rest of 2018. Rounding out our cash flow performance, in the first quarter of 2018, our operations generated $151 million of cash compared to a use of cash of approximately $152 million last year. As discussed on recent calls, our Q1 2017 cash flow results were impacted by the effect of a timing difference between the collection of a single large receivable in Q4 of 2016 of approximately $160 million, for which the payment to the supplier was due and paid in January 2017. Adjusted free cash flow, which we define as cash flow from operations, less capital expenditures, plus the change in the balance of our inventory financing facility, was $64 million in the first quarter of 2018, up from negative - a negative $166 million last year, including the $160 million timing difference I just discussed. We’re pleased to see the positive shift in adjusted free cash flow generation year over year, as we have been heavily focused on improving our cash collection cycle. For the full year, we expected adjusted free cash flow to be between $85 million to $120 million. At the end of last year, we gave you a range of $100 million $140 million for the full year 2018 cash flow from operations. We expect to achieve this range, but also wanted to provide guidance on free cash flow as we're using more of our inventory financing facility due to growth of certain vendors, and we believe that our cash flows are best viewed when combining cash flow from operations, CapEx and the inventory facility. In Q1, we invested $5 million in capital expenditures, down from $10 million last year, and we used $8 million to repurchase approximately 221,000 shares of the company's common stock in this first quarter. As of today, we have used $22 million in 2018 to repurchase a total of 637,000 shares, and do not expect to make any further repurchases in the second quarter. Based on the timing of repurchases in Q1, there was no impact on diluted EPS. We did not make any acquisitions in the first quarter of 2018, but in comparison, we used $181 million to acquire Datalink in the first quarter of last year. In addition, we did not repurchase any shares in the first quarter of last year. All of this led to a cash balance of $100 million at the end of the quarter, of which $81 million was resident in our foreign subsidiaries, and $259 million of debt outstanding under our revolving and our term debt facility. This compares to $184 million of cash and $371 million of debt outstanding at the end of Q1 2017. I will now turn the call back to Ken to review our 2018 outlook.