Bonnie J. Cruickshank-Lind
Analyst · CJS Securities
Thanks, John. Today, I'll cover our business segments first, starting with Technical Products. Sales of $107 million increased 1% versus last year. We had strong volume growth in filtration and tape, in addition to a higher value mix in both of these areas. We also had modest translation benefits. Offsetting this were challenging conditions in Europe that extended to some of our other product lines. Technical Products operating income of just under $10 million was down from an all-time quarterly record of $12.5 million last year. In addition to impacts from conditions in Europe, margins this year reflect a higher manufacturing cost due to increased input costs and less efficient mill operating performance. Moving next to Fine Paper. Sales of almost $100 million were up 15% versus last year. In addition to growth from acquired brands, sales benefited from an improved mix and double increases in targeted areas, such as luxury packaging and premium labels. Operating income was $16.3 million and compared to $10.8 million last year. After excluding acquisition costs in both years, adjusted income grew by $3 million or 23%. This higher operating income resulted from increased volume, a higher value sales mix, record manufacturing performance and lower input costs. These items more than offset increased selling, marketing and distribution costs associated with the higher sales. Turning next to unallocated corporate and other results. Sales of acquired non-premium brands in the first quarter were $6.8 million, with operating income of $300,000. In 2012, sales were $5.8 million, with profit of $700,000. These grades are not considered strategic to us, and margins will vary with mix and market conditions. Unallocated corporate cost was $4.1 million and compared to $7.8 million last year, which included $3.5 million for a onetime pension settlement charge. Excluding this charge, costs in 2013 were slightly below last year. Costs this year are expected to remain around $4 million per quarter, about where they've been for the past 3 years, as we continue to leverage our corporate infrastructure as we grow. Consolidated selling, general and administrative expense was $21 million, up from $19.5 million last year. As you would expect, most of the increase was in Fine Paper, where we incurred additional costs related to the higher sales levels. As a percentage of sales, SG&A for the quarter held constant at 9.8%. As we grow, we expect SG&A as a percent of sales to decrease as we use existing resources to grow efficiently. Spending for the remainder of the year is likely to be between $19 million and $20 million per quarter. Now let's move to corporate financial items. Taxes. Our effective tax rate was 38% in the first quarter, significantly higher than last year's 29%, As we indicated in the February call, we expected a higher rate this year due to increased repatriation of capital from Germany. We said that the rate could go as high as 40% depending upon proposed changes in German tax law. Following the February call, these changes were enacted and resulted in the 8% rate. We expect this to decline next year to around 35%, which should be more indicative of our long-term run rate. Neenah's cash tax rate is below 15%, significantly less than the book rate as we use our net operating losses to offset cash tax payments due on North American income. Currently, we have approximately $50 million of NOLs remaining and expect to use these by the end of 2014. Cash flow from operations was $2 million in the first quarter. This included a $23 million increase in working capital, mostly as a result of higher receivables. Sales growth and seasonality tend to drive working capital increases in the first quarter as we come off of year-end lows. The positive cash generation in the current quarter, compared to a $13 million cash deficit last year, and we also had unusual and higher outflows for items like pension settlement, taxes on stock compensation and acquisition-related inventory. Our U.S. pension plans are in sound shape and are funded at just over 90%. Globally, pension plan contributions and payments in 2013 are expected to be around $17 million, which was consistent with where we were last year. Our desire is for the U.S. plan to be fully funded by the end of 2014 at about the same time our NOLs expire, in this way, minimizing the impact on our overall cash flow generation. Capital spending was $4.7 million in the quarter, compared to $3.5 million last year. For the full year, we expect to be near the top of our $25 million to $30 million range with the nonwoven meltblown line investment. Let me talk next about our capital structure. Debt was $187 million at quarter end, up from $182 million at year end. The increase, in part, reflected funding for the $7 million purchase of brands from Southworth. As of quarter end, our debt was comprised of $90 million of long-term bonds, $50 million drawn on our revolver, $29 million for a term loan and then the balance was in Germany. Interest expense was $1 million below last year, largely due to lower debt levels and a lower average interest rate, following prior year redemptions of senior notes paying 7.375% that were replaced by short-term borrowings at a rate of about half that level. We noted in the release yesterday that we will redeem another $20 million of senior notes in the second quarter, further reducing interest expense. In today's low interest rate environment, we continue to monitor the credit markets for additional opportunities to take advantage of these conditions. Let me close with a few thoughts on cash generation and allocation. As John said, our businesses generate significant cash flow. Reinvesting through organic growth projects is our first choice, and we actively prioritize growth and cost-reduction capital. Our acquisition screening process is active, and we're looking for opportunities that are a strategic fit and provide the returns we need. In the past, we used excess cash to pay down debt. Our balance sheet is now very strong, with debt to EBITDA of around 1.5x and at the low end of our targeted range. Therefore, paying down more debt is not a particularly attractive option. Returning cash directly to shareholders has been and continues to be an important part of our capital deployment strategy. We maintained our dividend throughout the great recession and have grown it 50% in the past 3 years. In addition, we have the ability to buy back shares if the opportunity is compelling. In 2012, we spent approximately $4 million on share buybacks at an average price of less than $26 per share. To summarize, with substantial cash flow generating ability and a capital structure with ample borrowing capacity, we're in a great position to take advantage of opportunities to drive incremental value and provide returns to our shareholders. With that, I'll turn things back to you, John.