Bonnie C. Lind
Analyst · Mark Weintraub, Buckingham Research
Thank you, John. Let me begin today with business segment results, starting with Technical Products. Sales of $95 million increased 1% versus prior year but were up 4% after excluding currency effects. The increase in sales was led by volume growth in Filtration, tape and labels and growth in our higher value products. Filtration continues to show good growth in international sales and meltblown combination products. And in labels, products such as heat transfer and durable print media, grew at a double-digit pace. Turning to the bottom line, Technical Products' operating income of $6.4 million was down from a fourth quarter record $7.9 million last year. With a weaker global economic environment in the fourth quarter, customers reduced their year-end inventories and we took downtime to similarly control our inventory levels. We also had higher manufacturing, selling and administrative costs in the quarter that offset slightly lower input cost for pulp and other raw materials. Moving next to Fine Paper. Sales in the fourth quarter were $91 million up by approximately $20 million or 27% versus last year. While the majority of the increase was due to acquired brands, our mix also reflected a greater proportion of sales in core, higher-value products, and we also grew strongly in targeted areas such as luxury packaging and premium labels. Our product support high-quality image, and targeted markets include premium jewelry, cosmetics and apparel, as well as high-end beverage and food labels. We've been pleased with growth at existing customers as our products become part of the brand identity and also our success in attracting new pieces of business. In total, packaging and label sales were up 15% in the quarter. Operating income was $13.1 million and included $1.1 million for integration costs. Even with these one-time costs, profits grew 35%, or more than $3 million, compared to last year. Higher income resulted from sales growth, as well as manufacturing efficiency and lower pulp prices. In total, these benefits more than offset increased selling, marketing and distribution costs associated with the higher sales. Now as John mentioned, the integration of brands was executed very well by our Fine Paper team, and helped ensure we maximize the value from the acquisition. We were able to internalize manufacturing capabilities and increase efficiencies more quickly than we planned, leading to start up of a paper machine in Neenah that had previously been idle. Consequently, our asset base is now fully utilized. We no longer have any base paper outsourcing needs related to the acquisition. Integration is complete and full year costs of $5.8 million were better than our estimate of $7 million as we were able to transition the grades more efficiently, and capital required from new capabilities was also less than originally projected. Turning next to unallocated corporate and other results. Fourth quarter sales of acquired non-premium grades were $6.7 million, with operating income of $600,000. These grades are sold through existing distribution channels but require limited incremental support cost. Our unallocated corporate cost was $4.2 million, and it included $400,000 of expense related to retirement of bonds. In 2011, unallocated corporate costs were $4 million. We are leveraging our corporate infrastructure as we grow and costs in 2013 are likely to remain where they've been for the past 3 years, in the range of just under $4 million per quarter. Consolidated selling, general and administrative expense was $20.3 million, up from $18.1 million last year. For the full year, spending in 2012 was $77 million. While this was up from 2011, mostly due to selling and marketing support for the additional Fine Paper sales, SG&A as a percent of sales continued to decline. Spending in 2013 is likely to be around the same level and will continue to decrease as a percent of sales as we use existing resources to grow efficiently. Let's move now to corporate financial items. Our effective tax rate was 29% in the fourth quarter, consistent with where it's been all year, but above an unusually low quarterly rate of 24% in 2011. For the full year, our rate was 30% in 2012 and 29% in 2011. We mentioned in our last call that in 2013 we expected our rate to be approximately 35%, primarily as a result of increased cash repatriation in 2013. Recent proposed changes in German tax law may result in the elimination of certain deductions currently available to us in Germany, and could push our consolidated tax rate to near 40%. Our cash tax rate however, is significantly lower as we continue to use net operating losses to offset cash tax payments that are due on North American income. As of year end, we had approximately $66 million of our NOLs remaining, and expect to use these up by the end of 2014. Finally in the fourth quarter, we received notification that our position on issues related to an IRS audit was upheld. Subsequently, we reversed the tax liability on the balance sheet, and recognized $4.4 million in income as discontinued operations since this item was related to our former pulp operations. Cash flow from operations was $18 million in the fourth quarter, slightly above last year, as higher earnings and reductions in working capital were partly offset by the timing and amounts of benefit contributions. Pension plan contributions in 2012 were $15 million, and that's up from the $13 million we had in 2011. In 2013, funding is expected to be approximately the same level. Although with lower discount rates, pension expense will increase by about $1 million. Our pension plans remain in really strong shape and were funded at just under 90% at year end. Capital spending was $9.2 million in the quarter and included initial payments from the nonwoven meltblown line in Germany. For the full year, our capital spending was $25 million, at the lower end of our targeted range of $25 million to $30 million. In 2013, we expect to be closer to the upper end of this range. Let me next talk about our capital structure. Debt was $182 million at year end, down slightly from about where we were in September of this year and from December of last year. During the fourth quarter, we called $58 million of our bonds and we financed that transaction through a new $30 million term loan, and capacity that we had available on our revolving line of credit. We amended this line during the quarter, to extend the maturity to November 2017, and we were also able to reduce interest rates and fees. At year end, our debt was comprised of $90 million of long-term bonds, $56 million on our revolver, $30 million for the term loan and a balance of $6 million in Germany. Our balance sheet's strong with debt-to-EBITDA of around 1, 5x and provides us flexibility and borrowing capacity to support future growth initiatives. With the changes made to our capital structure to take advantage of today's low interest rates, we expect interest expense in 2013 to be approximately $11 million, down from over $13 million in 2012. Let me close with some thoughts on cash generation and allocation. Our businesses generate significant cash flows, and we will reinvest, redeploy or return these to provide attractive returns for the shareholders. Reinvesting through organic growth projects or value-added acquisitions is our first choice, and we actively prioritize organic growth capital while also looking for acquisitions that are a good strategic fit and provide necessary financial returns. If attractive investment opportunities are not available in the short term, we may redeploy capital to pay down debt and preserve financial flexibility. However, as noted, today we have more than adequate financial capacity. Returning cash to shareholders is also a part of our capital deployment strategy. This includes providing a meaningful and consistent dividend to our shareholders, and in 2013, we significantly boosted our dividend to reflect our higher cash flow generation. In addition, we can buy back shares if the opportunity is compelling. As John mentioned earlier, in 2012, we spent approximately $4 million on share buybacks. So in summary, we're starting 2013 on strong financial footing. With strong cash flows generated by our businesses and a capital structure with lots of capacity, we're in a great position and can take advantage of opportunities we see to drive incremental value for our shareholders going forward. With that, I'll turn things back to you, John.