Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the NovaGold First Quarter 2021 Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to Melanie Hennessey, Vice President, Corporate Communications. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Operator. Good morning, everyone. We are pleased that you have joined us for NovaGold’s 2021 first quarter financial results and for an update on the Donlin Gold project. On today’s call, we have Dr. Thomas Kaplan, NovaGold’s Chairman; Greg Lang, NovaGold’s President and CEO; and David Ottewell, NovaGold’s Vice President and CFO. At the end of the webcast we will take questions both by phone and by text. I would like to remind our webcast and call participants that, as stated on slide three, any statements made today may contain forward-looking information such as projections and goals, which are likely to involve risk detailed in our various EDGAR and SEDAR filings and forward-looking disclaimers included in this presentation. I now have the pleasure of turning over the presentation to our President and CEO, Greg Lang. Greg?

Thank you, Melanie, and good morning, everyone. Our Donlin Gold project is in the western part of Alaska as shown on slide four. Donlin is a 50-50 partnership with Barrick Gold. Mining has always been an important part of the Alaskan economy and it is becoming even more important to state revenues with the decline in oil prices and tourism. As shown on the map, there are six producing mines, and numerous exploration and development projects in the state. In terms of scale quality and exploration potential, Donlin Gold’s attributes far exceed any other gold development project on the horizon. When combined with our longstanding native corporation partnerships, the exponential leverage to rising gold, strong cash position, key federal and state permits in hand, and an experienced management team and Board, as well as supportive long-term shareholders, NovaGold is in a league of their own. Slide five highlights the 2021 achievements, NovaGold and Barrick jointly released the remaining assay drill results in March from the 85-hole program we completed last year, which yielded higher drilled grade thicknesses than predicted by previous modeling and has improved interpretation of gold mineralization controls. These results have bolstered our confidence in the recent geologic modeling concepts and confirmed multiple high-grade extensions in both the intrusives and sedimentary rocks, and really importantly, many of this near surface. For permitting, in November 2020, Alaska published an addition public notice comment period for the water rights applications for the mine site and transportation facilities. This closed in December 2020. Water rights are for local surface water sources and groundwater to be used for process water, dust, fire control and other mining activities. In March 2021, with Donlin Gold support, Alaska introduced a second public notice period, which closed on March 26th. We anticipate the Department of Natural…

Thank you, Greg. Slide 12 highlights our first quarter operating performance. We reported a net loss of $8 million, an increase of $1.4 million from the prior year quarter, primarily due to higher G&P expense and completion of assays from the 2020 drill program at Donlin. Lower interest rates led to lower interest income earned on cash and term deposits and lower interest expense incurred on the Barrick note. First quarter cash flows are highlighted on slide 13. We spent $7.7 million in the first quarter slightly lower than the prior year quarter. Higher G&A spending and government funding was offset by a reduction in withholding taxes paid on vested PSUs. The company elected to not pay the withholding taxes on shares issued to the CEO and CFO to conserve cash. On slide 14, we note our robust treasury. We ended the first quarter with cash and term deposit of $114.2 million and we also have $75 million due from Newmont in July this year and an additional $25 million in July 2023. We continue to anticipate spending $31 million to $35 million in 2021, including $18 million to $22 million to fund our share in Donlin and $13 million for our corporate G&A costs. And with that, I will turn the call back over to Greg.

Thank you, Dave. As shown on the chart on slide 15, when you look at the resources at Donlin compared with 15 other large gold projects in the Americas, Donlin is the largest in its category with the reserves that is almost four times greater than the average. A federally permitted project that’s got almost 40 million ounces of gold just to begin with, in a jurisdiction where the rule of law is not a novelty is almost unheard of. Grade stands out as another central characteristic of any mineral deposit. Deposit with higher grades provides resilience through multiple commodity cycles, a key attribute to ensure the successful development of any great mining operation. As shown on slide 16, at 2.25 grams Donlin has twice the global average grade for large open pit deposits. Not only is global gold production decreasing for most of the majors, but average grades continue to climb over the past decade. There are only a few mines in the world that produce greater than 1 million ounces in 2020. Donlin would be in rare company as currently envisioned the project would average 1.1 million ounces per year over its entire life as shown on slide 17. For the long-term investor there is additional value that comes from our mine with a multiple decade lifespan. Looking at other comparable mining operations around the globe both in production and in development, Donlin would rank among the top operations that we are producing today. Slide 18 shows some of the largest producing mines globally and the largest development stage projects. Only one development project has both global scale in a desirable mining jurisdiction and only a few operations produced 1 million ounces, further illustrating that projects like Donlin are scarce and are needed to replenish the industry’s diminishing…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Lucas Pipes of B. Riley Securities. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good morning, everyone. Greg, I wanted to ask a little bit more about updated feasibility study and specifically would it be possible at this point here to provide maybe some color around timing and then from that I have maybe one or two more follow ups? Thank you.

All right. Lucas, good morning, and thank you for joining our call. As far as timing, over the next few months we will be, obviously, incorporating the assays into our geologic model and we are planning a small follow up program on some of the real high-grade zones we have encountered, which frankly some are just exceptional results. So we will be conducting the drill program in the next few months. At the same time, we will be reviewing many aspects of the project with our partner from tailings management, flow sheets, water controls and so on. So this technical work will provide the basis for the owners to lay out the criteria of the project that we are taking forward, in terms of scale, throughput and so on. So, that’s going to -- the work -- the tradeoff studies will take us through to September, at which time we would make the decision to embark on a new feasibility study and that’s a process that we think will take about a year.

Very helpful. I really appreciate that detail there. And then maybe it’s a bit premature, but you touched on it a little bit just now. But in terms of the key points that would be revisited and an updated feasibility study, where would you say could the market be looking for some really key updates? Thank you.

I think the real key update that we will be providing when we embark on a feasibility study is the general approach to the project. I think as most people are aware we have been evaluating various staged development scenarios to reduce the upfront capital requirement. So part of the studies that we will be undertaking in the next few months as the geologic models are updated is, what is the final throughput that we want to target for Stage 1 and other significant parts of the project the gas pipeline, third-party participation and so on. So we want to get all of those issues really laid to rest and then we will embark on the new study.

That’s very helpful. Greg, team really appreciate all the details. Continue best of luck. I will turn it over.

Okay. Thank you, Lucas.

Our next question comes from John Tumazos of John Tumazos Very Independent Research. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much. When will the 2020 drill program be completed and all the results and are the results interesting enough that there might be an additional drill program to follow-up on those results prior to the updated feasibility study?

All right. Well, good morning, John. Working with Barrick we have released all of the assay results from the 85 holes that we completed last year and some really compelling results. And what you will note in our results we had areas of 10 plus grams that came in some 3 meters below the surface. So a lot of the work that we are planning this year is obviously to follow up on those near surface high-grade intervals that would be mined early in the project’s life. So that will be the big focus of the program. And I would -- last year we drilled 85 holes. I don’t think it will be that extensive of a program this year. But we are working with Barrick to finalize the drill hole locations and we are expecting to start sometime later in April. We have got the camp open now and we are mobilizing food and supplies ready to begin drilling.

Do you think that the priority on updating the feasibility study is such that even if you get some great new results there won’t be a third drill campaign and that you will just stop and do the feasibility study or is it too early to make that call?

John, I think, the program, the drilling we did last year, which was the most extensive in over 12 years and the drilling that we are contemplating this year. I think that will conclude the drill programs in and around the ACMA and Lewis deposits, and that will position us into moving forward with the new feasibility study. There will be additional drilling required such as geotechnical drilling, hydrological water wells and so on, but the drilling to define the ore body, I expect that to be largely wrapped up this season.

Thank you and good luck.

Thank you, John.

We have a question coming by text that I will read out, given the extensive amount of drilling at Donlin, what did the latest result represent and what did they mean for the future of the project?

Well, I think that’s -- there has been a lot of drilling at Donlin over the years. I think we are now approaching some 1,500 holes primarily core holes and the new results go back a few years to our appreciation that, as we looked at this stage development with smaller equipment, we advanced the hypothesis that the higher grade intrusive structures, which still carry the lion’s share of the gold that these structures were thick enough and continuous enough to be mined separately, so that the goal of this program is to have a smaller higher grade project in the initial stage. And clearly some of the results multiple intercepts of 10-plus grams, 30 grams, 40 grams and good thick intervals. These really support our view that we can separately mine the high-grade and enhance the mill feed, and have a smaller project, which still a very significant production profile.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from David Lasenky [ph], a Private Investor. Please go ahead.

Good morning, gentlemen and ladies. Just a couple of questions, the fact that the drilling has been completed for 2020 that assay program. Do you expect to raise proven reserves as a result of that drilling?

They would -- clearly the results exceeded our expectations and we are incorporating the data into the geologic model there. I never like to get ahead of any modeling efforts and let the work speak for itself. But I am very positive on the outcome, just really based that on it, across the Board we encountered higher grades, although thinner higher grade intervals and for an overall increase in the grade thickness of what we had previously modeled. So, certainly, a very positive how much of that translates ultimately into reserves. We don’t know, that’s why we are doing the update, but certainly, some great results that can only help our understanding of the ore body.

And the final question is, if any of the royalty trust shown interest in financing in a future like Franco-Nevada or Silver Wheaton or companies like that?

Certainly, a lot of -- there is interest by streaming and royalty companies and they follow our activities. I think our focus right now is wrapping up the new geological model and proceeding with the feasibility study. As far as financing options, there are many out there to be considered, streaming is on the list. My personal preferences do as much of the financing as we can with debt or other non-open ended instruments. But the big focus right now is the feasibility study and we will -- as we get further advanced with that, we will turn our attention to the financing option.

Well, just a personal opinion, I think, that the longer you wait the better off you will be in terms of royalty trust, because I am anticipating by the end of the year $2,500 gold and by the end of next year $3,000 gold, so just my personal opinion and thank you for…

Well, thank you…

… answering the questions.

Thank you, David. We are also -- I share your view and we are bullish on the gold price ourselves.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Greg Lang for any closing remarks.

Well, everyone, thank you for taking the time to get an update on our activities. Dr. Kaplan, have you any closing remarks?

Thank you, Greg. Are you able to hear me all right? I would conclude simply by saying that the results speak for themselves. The assays from the time that we started to deliver upon them to the final 30% from tip to tail they exceeded our expectations. And as somebody who’s been in the mining business now for almost three decades, I can’t count on one hand the times that the most expansive and aggressive drill program undertaken in the last 10 years or 12 years of any project has yielded the kind of upside delights that the Donlin drilling delivered for Barrick and for ourselves. I think that what you are seeing is that Donlin is, as we have often said, the gift that keeps on giving. I have to highlight the fact that we are only focused right now on that gold, which would be in the mine plan, the first phase of the mine plan. The 3 kilometers that’s been drilled are only 3 kilometers out of 8 kilometers of mineralization. There are deep targets, deep high-grade targets, laterally across the entirety of the mineralized belt and that 8 kilometers itself represents only 5% of the land package. It’s a forward looking statement. Take it for what it is. But those of you who know me know that my track record has been built through the drill bit and I am never happy if drill rigs aren’t moving somewhere. But what I can say is this, I feel very strongly and this is only been the feeling that’s been reinforced over the last year that the next Donlin could very well be a Donlin. And it’s my expectation that you are going to see enormous value unlocked for Barrick shareholders, as well as NovaGold shareholders from Donlin.…

Thank you, Tom, and everyone, thank you, again for joining our call. We will keep you updated and look forward to the next quarter. Take care, everyone. Stay safe.

Thank you.

This concludes today’s conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating and have a pleasant day.