Rodney Sacks
Analyst · Judy Hong
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for attending this call. I'm Rodney Sacks. Hilton Schlosberg, our Vice Chairman and President is with me today, as is Tom Kelly, our Senior Vice President of Finance. Before we begin, I would like to remind listeners that certain statements made during this call may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and which are based on currently available information regarding the expectations of management with respect to revenues, profitability, future business, future events, financial performance, and trends. Management cautions that these statements are based on management's current knowledge and expectations and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside the control of the company that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made herein. Please refer to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2011, and our most recent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, including the sections contained therein entitled, "Risk Factors and Forward-looking Statements" for a discussion on specific risks and uncertainties that may affect our performance. The company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. An explanation of the non-GAAP measures of gross sales and certain expenditures, which may be mentioned during the course of this call, is provided in the notes designated with asterisks in the condensed consolidated statements of income and other information attached to the earnings release dated August 4, 2011. A copy of this information is also available on our website at www.hansens.com in the Investor Relations Section. Overall, the company had a good second quarter with record sales up 26.4% and with earnings per share increasing to $0.90 from $0.69 in the same quarter last year. In fact, we are pleased to report another memorable milestone for the company in the second quarter, namely the achievement of the company of gross sales in excess of $0.5 billion in a quarter. Despite difficult economic environment in our major markets, the United States and Europe, the energy drink category has continued to show growth. This is quite remarkable in the face of general consumer weakness and higher gas prices, which appear to be driving reduced traffic in key retail channels, and speaks to the resilience of the energy drink category. Not only is the energy drink category continuing to show growth, but sales of Monster Energy continue to show growth in excess of the category. Sales of Peace Tea also showed growth. According to the Nielsen reports, for the 13 weeks through June 25, 2011, all outlets combined, namely convenience, grocery, drug and mass merchandises, excluding Wal-Mart, sales in the energy drink category, including Shots, increased 15.8% versus the same period a year ago. Sales of Monster grew 22.3% in the 13-week period, while sales of Red Bull increased by 14.6%. Sales of Rockstar increased 20.3%. Sales of 5-Hour increased 33.4%. Based on Nielsen data in recent months, it appears that the growth rate for 5-Hour is continuing to slow. Sales of Amp decreased 5.3%, sales of NOS increased 10.7% and sales of Full Throttle decreased 14.2%. According to Nielsen reports for the 5 weeks ended June 25, 2011, sales of energy drinks in the convenience and gas channel increased by 16% over the comparable 5-week period in 2010. Sales of Monster increased by 21.4% over last year, while sales of Red Bull increased by 15.3% over last year. Rockstar was up 25.7% while 5-Hour was up 29%. Amp was down 4.7%, NOS was up by 10.2% and Full Throttle was down 11.7%. According to Nielsen for the 5 weeks ended June 25, 2011, Monster's market share of the energy drink category in the convenience and gas channel, including energy shots in dollars was 29.2% against Red Bull share of 31.7%, and Rockstar's share of 10.3% and 5-Hour share of 11.1%. According to Nielsen in the 13 weeks ended June 25, 2011, for all outlets combined, sales of energy plus coffee drinks increased 6.7% over the same period last year. Java Monster was 8.6% higher than last year and Starbucks Double Shot Energy was up 15.1%. However, our net sales over Java Monster line to our customers in the second quarter were approximately 11% higher than in the comparable quarter in 2010. Java Monster sales and market share continue to show improvement and Java Monster remains the leading brand in this category. On new non-carbonated Monster Rehab energy drink with electrolytes and additional supplements, which we launch in the first quarter, continues to do well and has already become one of our better-selling items in the convenience and gas channel. We are very pleased with consumer response to this product and we plan to introduce additional products in the Monster Rehab line later this year. We continue to see improvement in Monster's market share and sales numbers in Canada. According to Nielsen, in the convenience and gas channel in Canada, for the 12 weeks ending June 4, 2011, the energy drink category grew 8%. Monster sales increased 41% and its market share increased 5.7 points over the same period last year to 24.7%, while Red Bull sales increased 6% and its market share decreased by 0.7 points to 37.6%. Rockstar's sales decreased 7% and its market share decreased by 2 points to 12.3%. According to Nielsen, sales in the energy drink category in Mexico grew 9.5% in May 2011 over last year. Sales of Monster Energy in Mexico in May 2011 grew 49% over last year, while sales of Red Bull were 10.7% lower. Monster's market share in Mexico in May 2011 increased by 9.3 points to 35.2% over the same period last year. This excludes Java Monster. Sales continue to progress satisfactorily in United Kingdom and Continental Europe. Net sales in Europe in the second quarter of 2011 in dollars were approximately 102% higher than in the same period last year. Monster continues to gain momentum in Europe. Both cost of goods and selling and general expense and administrative expenses in Europe were lower in the second quarter of 2010, on a per-case basis in local currencies, although higher when converted into U.S. dollars. While the maturity of the countries in Western Europe are now operating profitably, we still incurred operating losses in the majority of the countries in our newer markets in Central and Eastern Europe in the second quarter, although we believe our brand is becoming more established in those countries. We are pleased to report that we launched Monster Energy in Greece, Cyprus, the Baltic States, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, Ukraine and Portugal during the first half of 2011. We also launched Monster Energy in Colombia, South America in July. We are planning launches in additional countries in Central and Eastern Europe, South America and Asia in the second half of 2011. As previously reported, both gross and net sales for the comparative first 6-month period of 2010, were negatively impacted by advanced purchases made by customers in the 2009 fourth quarter. Due to our announcement of a new per-case marketing contribution program for Monster Energy distributors, which commenced on January 1, 2010, as well as to avoid potential interruptions in product supply due to our announcement to transition to the SAP enterprise resource planning system in January 2010. If sales attributable to the 2009 fourth quarter volume have been included in the 2010 first quarter, which the company previously estimated at approximately 4% to 6% of 2009 fourth quarter sales, such sales would have moderated the increase in net sales that we achieved in the first 6 months of 2011 from 35.6% to 31.3%. The volume had no effect on the results for the 2011 second quarter that we are now reporting on. During the second quarter of 2011, we continue to add TV advertising to promote our Worx Energy brand, which increased selling expenses, as a percentage of net sales by approximately 1% in the quarter. We continue to see improved response to our Worx Energy brand from consumers and remain confident for the brand. As previously reported, we had a focus period with Coca-Cola refreshments with Worx Energy and achieved increased distribution levels, and consequently continued our TV advertising. We have created a new TV commercial, which we intend to continue to air, but it's slightly lower levels than in the second quarter of 2011. In addition to advertising during the second quarter, costs incurred by us for sponsorships, samples, premiums and merchandise displays were higher than last year, which contributed to higher selling expenses in the second quarter, as a percentage of net sales as compared to last year. We're continuing to monitor our expenditures in these areas. Our trade development costs and cost of our sampling programs in Europe also contributed to higher selling expenses in the second quarter as a percentage of net sales. As an operating update, gross sales in July 2011 are approximately 15% higher than in July 2010. We caution again that sales in the single month are often disproportionately impacted by various factors, such as for example, selling days, days of the week in which holidays fall and the timing of promotions in retail stores, and should not necessarily be imputed to or regarded as indicative of, results for the fourth quarter. For example, many of our promotions this year are set for August and September, whereas many took place over May, June and July last year. For the first 3 months ended June 30, 2011, sales to retail grocery, specialty chains and wholesalers represented 4% of gross sales, down from 5% last year. Sales to club stores, drug chains and mass merchandisers represent a 10% of sales, down from 13% last year. Sales to full-service distributors represented 64% of sales, which is the same as last year. Sales outside the United States increased to 19% from 16% in the same period last year, and other sales were approximately 3% compared with a 2% last year. Gross sales to customers outside the United States in the second quarter of 2011 exceeded $100 million for the first time, $100 million is the first time, and amounted to $102.6 million compared to $66.6 million in the same quarter last year, increasing 54% over the same period last year. Included in such sales are sales to the company's military customers, which are delivered in the U.S. and then tranship to the military and their customers overseas. Our PC line of ready-to-drink iced teas continues to be well received by consumers, and is gaining traction. Gross sales of Peace Tea were 33% higher in the quarter than in the comparable quarter last year. Gross profit margin achieved in the second quarter was 52.8% this quarter versus 52.9% in the same quarter last year. We continue to believe that cost of goods will remain higher throughout the remainder of 2011 than in 2010, primarily due to increased costs of aluminum cans, PET containers, freight and a number of our ingredients. As previously indicated, our sugar and apple juice concentrated costs have largely been covered for this year. We do not believe that raw material cost increases at the current levels will have a material negative effect on our margins. Distribution expenses as a percentage of net sales in the second quarter were lower than the same period last year. We continue to benefit from efficiencies in this area even though cost of freight and gas have continued to increase. Selling expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to 12.9% in the quarter compared to 10.4% in the same period last year. We are continuing to invest in the Monster Energy brand internationally, including increasing the number of additional trade development sales personnel and sampling stock in Western, Central, and Eastern Europe and Australia, to merchandise and call on small independent stores in many of the countries in which our distribution partners do not offer a full-service, direct-store delivery system. We believe the increased staffing will enable us to reach small independent stores and also increase awareness of our Monster Energy product in international markets through extensive sampling activities. We also believe that these activities will play an important role in the long-term development of the Monster Energy brand and the associated costs are included in selling expenses as opposed to payroll costs. General and administrative costs for the second quarter, as a percentage of net sales decreased to 7.2% from 8.1% in the same period last year. Sucb expenses were reduced by $1.6 million related to a legal settlement and $1 million related to insurance reimbursements. Although payroll was higher than last year, in part due to the appointment by us of additional sales and marketing staffs, as a percentage of sales, payroll was lower than last year. Operating losses in the second quarter of 2011 in Europe, including the Middle East and Africa, Australia and Brazil combined were higher than in the comparable quarter in 2010, primarily due to substantially increased operating losses incurred by us in the newer launched markets in Central and Eastern Europe. The operating results for Western Europe in the second quarter of 2011 improved over the comparable quarter of 2010. Our effective tax rate for the quarter in June 30, 2011, was 36.5% compared to 42% for the second quarter of 2010 and 39.3% for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily the result of a lower effective combined state tax rate, an increase in the tax benefits from the exercise of stock options and the establishment of a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets of a foreign subsidiary, established during the second fiscal quarter of 2010. Turning to the balance sheet. Cash and cash equivalents amounted to $418.2 million compared to $354.8 million at December 31, 2010. Short-term investments were $281.2 million compared to $244.6 million at December 31, 2010. Trade accounts receivables net increased to $161.6 million from $101.2 million at December 31, 2010. Days outstanding for receivables were 30.6 days at June 30, 2011, compared to 30 days at June 30, 2010, 27.7 days at December 31, 2010; and 36.3 days at March 31, 2011. Inventories increased to $156.8 million from $153.2 million at December 31, 2010. Average days of inventory was 64.7 days at June 30, 2011, which is lower than the 89.4 days of inventory at December 31, 2010. At June 30, 2011, the company have auction rate securities with a face value of $65 million, was $79.6 million at December 31, 2010, with unamortized cost basis of $55.6 million. During the second quarter, the company exercised its put option to sell $13.6 million of its auction rate securities. Also during the second quarter, the company entered into an agreement as a result of which, the company reclassified $24.5 million of auction rate securities from available for sale to trading, similar to the company's reclassification of $54.2 million of auction rate securities from available for sale to trading in the first quarter of 2010, following an earlier but separate agreement concluded in the quarter. Both of this agreements contain put option rights for applicable auction rate securities, in favor of the company at pre-agreed intervals in the future. For the 3 months ended June 30, 2011, the company had a net expense of approximately $350,000, in respect to the company's auction rate securities and related put options. During the second quarter, we did not repurchase any shares of the company. I would now like to open the floor to questions. Thank you.