Good day ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Mattel Incorporated Fourth Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode, later we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference; Mr. Martin Gilkes, Head of Investor Relations. Mr. Gilkes, you may begin.

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Joining me today are Chris Sinclair, Mattel's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Richard Dickson, Mattel's President and Chief Operating Officer; and Kevin Farr, Mattel's Chief Financial Officer. As you know, this afternoon we reported Mattel's 2016 full year and fourth quarter financial results. We'll begin today's call with Chris, Richard, and Kevin providing commentary on our results, and then we'll take your questions. To help guide our discussion today, we have provided you with a slide presentation. Our discussion and our slide presentation will reference non-GAAP financial measures, such as gross sales, adjusted gross margin and adjusted gross profit, adjusted selling and administrative expense, adjusted operating income and loss and adjusted earnings and loss per share as well as constant currency. Our earnings release also includes non-GAAP financial measures. The information required by Regulation G regarding non-GAAP financial measures is included in our earnings release and slide presentation, and both documents are available on the Investors section of our Web site, corporate.mattel.com. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that certain statements made during the call may include forward-looking statements relating to the future performance of our overall business, brands and product lines. These statements are based on currently available information and they are subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We describe some of these uncertainties in the Risk Factors section of our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, our 2016 Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and other filings we make with the SEC from time-to-time, as well as in our other public statements. Mattel does not update forward-looking statements and expressly disclaims any obligation to do so. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Chris.

Thank you, Martin and welcome everyone. I want to thank you for joining us on short notice. We decided to accelerate the earnings release because of our commitment to transparency which we know is important to all of you and because of the uncertainty coming out of the holiday season. And today as usual I'll lead things off with a perspective on both the full year and the quarter and then Richard and Kevin will each provide additional details. And as customary we'll open things up at the end for any questions that you may have. Okay, so let's begin. It’s fair to say that this was a very difficult quarter, characterized by a significant category slowdown led by the United States and by increased foreign exchange headwinds. The key holiday period saw a significant decline in industry sales growth and while the trend of the consumer coming out later isn't surprising, the pattern this year was much more dramatic. The result of this slowdown and shift in sales led to a significant increase in retail discounting and pressured shipments, particularly in December. Now in this difficult environment I think we've performed pretty well in some areas, but we're clearly disappointed in others. On a positive front, we did overcome a significant revenue challenge for the year. We continue to see very solid growth with our key core brands in the quarter. We also continue to perform well in our priority emerging markets and here it's important to note that excluding Disney Princess in the quarter, our POS growth was very much in line with the industry. We also continued to manage our overhead cost very tightly. On the down side our gross margins were significantly impacted by an elevated sales adjustment and by heavier discounting in some markets as…

Thank you, Chris. Well we knew going in that 2016 would be a very challenging year for us. In the midst of significant organizational change, we focused on the basics, prioritizing our core brands, leveraging license partnerships, and accelerating growth in emerging markets. And while recognizing the fourth quarter with financial results are below expectations, the progress that we made and what we achieved in 2016 is not just top line success, but a multitude of accomplishments which ultimately set us up well for the opportunity to grow in 2017. And I'll touch upon the few with these as we go through the results. For 2016, full year growth sales were flat in constant currency and are down only 3% as reported. This does mean we covered the Disney Princess gap [ph] and offset the continued softness in Monster High. As we entered 2017, our Global POS, excluding the impact at Disney Princess remains solid, highlighted by very strong momentum in a number of our key core brands. So let's start by taking a deeper dive into what happened to the industry in the fourth quarter, using the U.S. industry trends published by NPD. As Chris pointed out, while the overall toy categories started the year incredibly strong and ended the year up 5%, the pace of sales slowed and shifted in the critical holiday period, with the quarter finishing up only 3%. More importantly as the pace slowed in December the retail environment became much more cautious and we saw increased promotional activity and heavy discounting in the marketplace, which unexpectedly lead to delayed and reduced shipping. You can get a feel for how this unfolded when you look into the monthly NPD details. Industry sales in October were positive, but slower, compared to an earlier in the year.…

Thank you, Richard, and good afternoon everyone as Chris and Richard said, while we achieved our full year goal of filling the Disney Princess revenue gap we fell short of aggressive expectations for the fourth quarter and unfortunately the impact of the category slowdown required us to take action which impacted margins and cash flow of the year. Despite this we continue to be disciplined in our management of the P&L by balancing our response to the category slowdown, increased Forex headwinds and slight mix changes with our cost savings initiatives. We successfully delivered at the high end of our two-year cost savings target with total gross savings of 295 million. Today I'll walk you through our 2016 performance and then outline some broad expectations for 2017, but before going any further I want to remind you that unless otherwise noted, I'll be referring to gross sales in constant currency in order to provide better visibility into the underlying top line trends. And in order to provide more transparency into the fundamentals of the business I'll also reference some adjusted financial results that exclude certain non-recurring items related the acquisition of MEGA, Fuhu and Sproutling as well as severance related to our business transformation and cost savings initiatives. As always reconciliation to GAAP numbers are provided in our press release and the slide deck. Since Richard walked you through a summary of the 2016 performance of our top line, I'll begin by focusing on other P&L drivers. Sales adjustments were 12% this quarter versus 8.5% in the prior year. The increase was driven by additional promotional activities in response to the toy category slowdown in the holiday season. Naturally, this type of investment is intended to lift sales, but ultimately, we do not know the impact of our efforts until…

Thank you. [Operator Instruction] Our first question comes from Arpine Kocharian of UBS Investment Bank.

Chris, Richard, Kevin, a little bit surprising today that most important what I am having a hard time to understanding is the disconnect between very strong POS, your Q4 POS is above expectation, yet very disappointing bottom line results. If you could perhaps -- and I appreciate your detailed explanation on the cadence of sort of what happen in the quarter, but if you could just give a little bit of more detail, helping investors understand strong POS versus, such as sort of panic promotional activity that happened, industry wide, in the last sort of initially in December. Was it just driven by not seeing the traction you are expecting to see in the first two, three weeks of December and then it came out to be more than you expected or the holiday season overall, given that you are up mid-single digit on very tough comps year-over-year which is even slightly ahead of industry, what happened there? If you could just explain it a little bit more.

Yes, Arpine it's Chris. Let me take a crack at it. I think Richard sort of give you a little bit of the perspective, but if you stand back and look at what happened in the industry in Q4, it's slowed fairly significantly and it's showed growth [ph] from a little under 3% when it had been running over 6% as we led into the quarter. October and November were moderate growth months, but little below expectations, I think which is what started to create some stress at retail. Then as we rolled into the first three weeks of December the category actually went down precipitously and it was down about 7% for those three weeks. And I think that’s when the retail environment became extremely turbulent. We had enormous pressure put back on shipping expectations and forecast and I think we were faced with, do you react and try to get shipping in and protect that and get your product in for the consumers or do you take it on the chin. And we went through a fairly careful diagnosis of where we're better off and concluded we needed to get product on the shelves and protect the POS momentum. And that's sort of what happened and it actually wasn't just the U.S. The trends in Europe and some of the other developed markets were very, very similar if you go to NPD you'll find they tracked actually quite close to what we tracked here. So it's a fairly broad based sort of circumstances that we're confronting. The market rebounded dramatically on Christmas week and actually sold about 20% of the quarter sales on that week alone which is well above what even the historic late sales have been. And that's what basically saved the trends in terms of POS overall. But frankly by then it was too late, for the retailers and for all of us. And the good news is that it helped absorb some of the inventory, but the bad news is it came too late to truly affect any further shipments and also the discounting had already been sort of heavily under way. Unfortunately, it's a fairly ugly end to the year, but as we exit I think the message was, we felt pretty good about protecting our POS, we feel pretty good about where our inventories are broadly and now we just have to kind of move back on and get focused on sort of the '17 agenda.

Thank you, I appreciate that. Is there a way to sort of give investors a little bit more clarity on how much of the strong sort of POS was driven by that discounting versus sort of underlying trends and a consumer that dramatically shifted towards the end of the holiday season which was again very dramatic when you look at the industry data? And then I have a quick follow up question actually.

I can give you sort of my broad sense of it is that if you looked at the discounting trends for the industry in that period of time, they were pretty precipitous across the board. So, it wasn't a case of us being out their sort of a solo discounter and propping up our position, it was basically trying to be competitive in that environment and if anything, our level of discounting year-on-year was not as precipitous as the rest of the industry. Certainly, in the US numbers where we have visibility. So it clearly was a category issue that was occurring and I think, in that context I think we were as competitive as we could be, but certainly not out of line with what was going on.

No, that's very helpful thank you. And then in terms of looking into '17 you guys have previously given mid-single digit top line guidance, obviously, you'll update Toy Fair probably in a little bit more detail, but do you have any updates to that guidance?

I think we're still in that Box Car [ph], So obviously, you're resetting the base to you on a lot of dimensions, but that's what we're working through right now and we'll share with you at Toy Fair. But we still feel very good about sort of the fundamentals underneath in the entertainment properties that we talked about and certainly our emerging market focus on China should be quite positive this year.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Tim Conder of Wells Fargo Securities.

Just a follow on, a little bit on the prior question here. I think you had said previously regarding 2017 top line outlook and granted Chris, what you just said that the base bars have been lowered here. But I think previously you had said somewhere up between mid and high single digits. And then Kevin in your comments you said you see 2017 being impacted less than 2% for a full year. So, was that reference point up mid-to-high single digits for year-over-year growth and now you're saying that range comes off less than 2%, is that the proper way we should hear what you are saying?

I think that's probably a fair way to look at it Tim. I mean we're still confident that we're somewhere in the mid to the up-middle range of growth, but we do have to work off a little bit of inventory in some pockets. That's probably more of the first quarter issue, but obviously, it effects full year.

Right, and I think yourselves in the industry, yourselves and a major competitor have pretty good sell through last year in Q4 and then you refilled the shelves in Q1, so you got the kind of the combination of difficult Q1 compared paired with now you got to pull down some inventory in that, so Q1 won't look all that great, but in the whole scheme of things, it's obviously not that important to the full year. Is it fair?

Yes, it's probably fair. And I would point out, we have a fairly big portion Q2 with Cars [ph], so hopefully that gets trajectories back where they should be.

Perfect, segway into the next question. So, Kevin you said over 300 million on an incremental basis. One, I think previously you guys have thrown out 350, so just to clarify that and then the incremental again just as to make sure that we're all on the same understanding here. That's incremental above what's you already did in Cars this year or is that 300 million selective in Cars or 350 million year-over-year?

Yes, it's off to base currently of 2016, so it's bigger than just 300 million. And the 350 million to 300 million really is Forex, as we convert it from the standard to U.S. dollars and it changes in foreign exchange rates post-election that turns into 300 million plus.

Okay, and then on the operating margin commentary I think you -- and the goal was to get to the -- approach the low end, I think was the language you use, so about 15% to 20% in '17 and now you're saying a couple of years. Should we say that's maybe been pushed out a year, should we look to '18 directionally, is that reasonable?

Well, I think what I said in my comments and my prepared comments, was a couple of years. So, I think prior to that we would say it was 2018, but I think it's more like 2019.

Okay, and last question I know this is a little bit of the elephant in the room, was the recent announcement, so I'll put it out there. Should we anticipate that the current management on this call and the new CEO who has been named, that that now constitutes the go forward, nothing is permanent forever, but for the foreseeable future management team outlook?

Yes, I think I touched on that, Tim. That’s the team and we have a -- I think you've seen a bunch of them at Analyst Day, we have a very strong team underneath. So, all of that is tracking and Richard, Kevin are still in Mattel [ph], I will be somewhat involved.

Okay. Seems like good complimentary, simply as a talent. Okay, well thank you gentlemen appreciated.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Greg Badishkanian from Citi.

So, do you think you'll end Q1 with normalized inventory levels, and then how much you think the accelerated sales adjustments in Q1 and will that -- how much will that impact Q1 if it allows [ph] to go back, do you think that will continue into second quarter, assuming you have too high inventories entering into the second quarter, so when will this kind of discontinue in terms of the promotions, discounts, et cetera?

Yes, I think -- I would expect, we've been pretty decent shape on inventory as we get through the first quarter. And it's really in pocket, so this is not a horrendous issue at this point. But as far as the allowances and discount, I think we expect that to kind of be back to normalized levels at this point. And remember a lot of that is actually being used not for fewer discounting, it was to help accelerate some shipments. And I think that's sort of a balance with the major retailers. I'd say most of them are fairly comfortable with where they are at right now, the exit deals certainly helped everybody.

Yes, and I would just like to add, sales were below expectations, but our owned inventory is good quality, we've got mostly good brand POS momentum, exciting the year and we'll work through the extra inventory quickly and I don’t think we have to discounted it.

Okay. All right. And which of those categories were the cleanest versus the heavy, I think I know, but maybe you can just state that for me? In inventory, heaviest inventory --.

I think look I think our core brands are really in pretty decent shape. Barbie looks solid, obviously as expected. I think HotWheels is in good position. I think Construction was a little bit challenged and that’s probably were some of the inventory is. Frankly that was probably the most competitive categories we went into December. So there were a little bit long, but I think we've got good program in place.

Thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Felicia Hendrix of Barclays.

First, I just kind of have been confused throughout -- I was confused throughout December kind of watching the NPD data comment and I understand there was a shift with Hanukah, which kind of -- through things, but globally that might not have been as much as an impact, so I'm just wondering if you could discuss why you think the Train [ph] issue was weaker than expected in December? And then also how can we be confident that there isn’t broader toy industry issue here, and how can be confident that things can recover in 2017?

Yes. Good question Felicia, let me take a crack and Richard can jump on it if he'd like. Some of this is -- a lot of this is empirical, some of it’s a little bit anecdotal, but clearly Star Wars and the overlap of Star Wars was a huge factor in the slowdown as we got into the quarter. And it showed up dramatically on Star Wars related products. I think anecdotally, and we can't actually get this data, but we think a lot of foot traffic was brought in, in the prior year through things like Star Wars. We also had a lot of strong industry drivers in '15, I don't think the slate was nearly as strong in '16. So that contributed to it, you know things like Shopkins and Minions and so forth last year. If you look at the core drivers this year there weren't many big ones that were drawing in traffic, so part of the interpretation is that and I think just the continued trend of shifting later into the December month has been an ongoing [indiscernible]. But hard to say why it was so dramatic this year, and on the two extra days of selling, Christmas may have had something to do with it. Clearly that's where it showed up in POS and we think the shifts in e-commerce strength was another factor. I don’t -- our view is it’s -- there's not something fundamental going on because if you sort of look at where we exited non-POS for the year, 5% growth for the toy industry is still pretty robust, so we're going to continue to dig and look at that and obviously it’s something we need to get smarter about, but I think that's probably about the best we can articulate at this point. You know Hanukah was a factor here certainly, but not everywhere.

I would just add to Chris's comments that, complementing the industry that we're in, it continues to reinvent itself and put you know very good scores on the board in terms of growth. I think there were several years where you know the question of traditional toys was in play based on the evolution of technology and I think what you've seen in certainly our efforts of using technology to enable innovation through play and toy is taking shape. There were some incredible hits in the industry, certainly we had some, but overall the industry had some great hits, complemented by real new innovation. I think even in our portfolio you know entertainment driven properties despite the fact that people might be critical of a Superman vs Batman Box Office, we did spectacular with action figures and certainly introducing a new girls' brand with DC super hero girls was well received by the market, and last but not least, you know and I can't say it enough we have these incredible core assets that across generations and have been with us for many-many years. And to see Barbie, HotWheels and Fisher-Price all post the kind of resurgence in growth that they did this year leads us to believe in great spades that we are in a good industry and certainly innovation prevails.

Thanks, and then just for the e-commerce how much did you guys distribute through e-commerce this holiday period versus last holiday period?

I don't think we have publish that number. But it was up substantially for us and it’s probably -- I guess I can say probably in the high teens, was a percentage of our mix.

Do you know what it is for the industry overall?

I think our performance we feel was probably a little bit stronger on the -- certainly in the U.S. But I can't you give on measures on some of the other markets.

We saw a pretty -- it was pretty sort of low digit growth throughout the year with the real spike obviously towards the end there in the last several days. But not necessarily disproportion from its historical trend.

And this year why was there a big change do you think?

In the e-commerce, we did think it shifted positively, the ecommerce definitely. But again, it's offset based, it's not enough offset what was happening at brick and mortar.

And then the high teens, the increase that you had this year was that off of like a really easy comp for '15 over --.

No, actually I was giving a percentage of the mix of that number. We probably did a little better than that Felicia, and we were camping up big number last year in terms of growth.

Okay, and then in earlier of your comments you said that the issue was industry wide, but your level of discounting wasn’t as bad as the industry overall, I just want to make sure I heard that right.

I would say, I don’t want to cast too much on the competition. But it was clear that the full industry was discounting quite heavily and maybe a little more precipitously in some cases.

Okay, and then can we just -- I'm getting all of these incoming questions about, your salvage [ph] estimates were up, there was discounting which was clear, you explained that, I think everybody gets that, but the confusion is talking about the POS. Right, so if you're discounting and it's promotions would that benefit to your POS, so how do we think about it in a clean way?

I think that's what I was trying to articulate earlier. Clearly, discounting whether it's what we're supporting or through retail, whatever, would have an impact on POS. All I would point to is, in this environment where it was so pervasive [ph] everywhere, I think it's probably more a case of holding your own would be the way I would phrase it.

Okay, that's helpful. Final question just on the dividend, Mattel has definitely going through harder times and maintained its dividends and came out of that fine. But just wondering how that board stays comfortable with this current level over the dividend when the chances of covering the dividend has just been potentially pushed out?

We've taken a pretty hard look at 2017 and with the expectation of growth from the business and a lot tougher management on working capital inventory and things like that, I think we feel at this point reasonably comfortable, Felicia, we're okay there and we always reevaluate, but at this point, I think we're quite comfortable.

Yes, I think the other thing that we've taken into consideration is due to timing of Cars III shipments, we project higher customer collections in the second half of the year which should result in improved cash flow and as Chris said we are going to actively managed inventories. They're higher than our average for five years and we think we've got an opportunity really due to investments in IT systems to really manage that down in 2017.

Okay, thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Gerrick Johnson of BMO Capital Markets.

Gift cards, they seem to be a bigger portion of holiday sales each year. Can you talk about POS in January and of the shift, say the gift cards have pulled some POS into the first quarter from the fourth?

I'm not sure I would have that data right now, Gerrick.

Yes, I think you could say the last week of December was very strong, so I assume some of that related to using gift cards and whether that went into January, we don’t have that information at this point in time.

All right, thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Linda Bolton-Weiser of B. Riley.

So, I had a question on Barbie first, it seems that when you talk about the strong POS of like HotWheels and Barbie, the shipments in of Wheels, the numbers that you are showing seem to better match the POS numbers that you are quoting. But Barbie there seems to be a bigger disconnect. So is there something that about the POS data that you are not -- would Barbie POS be positive and as strong you're saying in every period, or you said in the last month and the last six weeks, but maybe in the last two weeks of the year Barbie POS faltered or I mean, is there anything to help us understand better, why Barbie seems to be a little bit more of a disconnect?

Sure Linda, its Richard. First of important to note that as we close the year in 2016, Barbie POS globally is up double digits and shipping commensurate with that, high single digit. So clearly a successful year for Barbie. Again, it remains number one global girl's property in the world, number three overall and when you look at it its POS is aligned with shipping. What you do see is and you'll recall Barbie had a very strong first three quarters and impact in the third quarter. Shipping actually was higher than POS and while it was part of the progress as the consistent growth that Barbie had, it did fill the shelves, retailers were excited about it and we benefitted from that. Unfortunately, as the industry slowed and retailers delayed the overall additional shipments that included Barbie. And so, to some extend she was the victim of the same thing that we are talking about in relation to the category. And the volatility that's happened at retail increased proportional efforts and ultimately delayed shipping. I can tell you, the growth of the brand overall has been broad based. Between the younger girl introduction of Dreamtopia which was a segment that we went after to reignite the fashion piece of the business with Fashionistas with different ethnicities and scale and ultimately the prominent, I Can Be segment, which is ultimately the marketing platform, all performed really up to and in some cases beyond our expectations. Space has been commentate without POS growth and we saw additional space this year and we see additional space coming up for 2017. And we are frankly very confident in our plans for Barbie in '17 and beyond maximizing the momentum that we currently have.

Yes, in guess I’d just step back and say if you look at the full year POS and shipping are aligned and its high single digits.

Okay thank you, that’s helpful. And then just getting back to the questioning on online sales, I recently read in a British Publication that 36% of toy sales in the UK were online, so that’s quite a bit higher than what we we're seeing in the U.S. So first of all, can you explain why that is? And secondly, as the U.S. switches more or shifts even more towards online, how do you think about that sharing responsibility with the retailer. So if the retailer needs to work harder to be more effective in bricks and mortar. How do you share their cost for them? So in other words, this holiday season you decided to help them, but how do you think about that in the future. I mean it’s not your responsibility, you're not the retailer, you're the supplier, so maybe you could just kind of talk about that as a longer-term issue.

It's Richard. You know I can't speak to the UK stat that you mentioned. But what we can tell you is and I think it’s fairly well known we continue to see the shift into online activity and in particularly as we mentioned to have a positive trend the whole year with a specific spike in the last few weeks, and even more specific few days. What we also do very closely is work with our retailers on their own sites as well as their stores and align the strategies, the product, the pricing and the promotion to complement. And so, and that will just simply continue and we will continue to not only align around them, but specifically build programs and marketing that go after that opportunity while honestly driving experiential activity and reasons to essentially drive traffic into stores. So we are you know traveling down two lanes and frankly both are opportunities, we need to enhance retailer experiences and create a reason to go to stores and we also need to continue to build robust programs and marketing that drives the continued trend of people shopping online.

Okay, thanks very much.

Thank you, our next question comes from Steph Wissink of Piper Jaffray.

Hi, good evening everyone, just a follow up question on Margo's appointment, Chris if you could talk a little bit more about how you expect to leverage her tech background, kind of some the enthusiasm around some of her experience. And as it relates to the dividend, I'm curious around some of the capital commitment and how you're thinking about capital flexibility, particularly if you do expect to you know be a little bit more into tech and how to fund some of that innovation.

Look, we'll have more time I guess, Steph, when we see you back at Toy Fair and Margo will be joining us actually on the Analyst Day that we have, so you'll get a better read on Margo's strengths. But first and foremost, she is an enormously talented leader and a good strategic leader which was one of the things we were quite interested in. Secondly, obviously her capabilities in the digital world and technology world are extremely important to some of the things that we started to talk about, whether it’s connected toys, or CRM our partnerships with some of the online players around the world. I think she'll be pretty instrumental on that and as you know we've made some investments in technology, we’re kind of working our way into it, but I think she can help us prioritize, streamline and accelerate those. So I think she'll have a huge impact there, but I think she's a keen strategist and brand builder and so forth so, I think we'll see benefits on a lot fronts.

Okay then just one follow up if I could, it hasn’t been asked and I am curious about the border tax, has there been any contingency planning behind the scenes. If you can give us an update on internal discussions around what might be your options if that does go into effect.

Yes, I think the discussions have been pretty high level. So far with regard to that that particular tax so it's little early to speculate. My thought processed, it looks to me that it would be more appropriate to raise or increase import duties which currently in the U.S. there aren’t any. So from the short-term perspective I don’t think there is much we can do, because all of our manufacturing facilities are outside the U.S. But I think longer term we're looking at those factories and we've been doing it a lot with regard to automation to take cost out and take people out and I think overtime if in fact there is a big total charge to get into the U.S. with imported products, then we have to relook at our manufacturing base and adjust accordingly. But short term, 90% of the toys are manufactured in China and it's going to impact the entire industry, so I think there is a shorter term above that longer term, I think we would react to it.

Final one for us is just regarding pricing. I think you have an advantage in 2016 and it sounds like in 2017 you expect a bit of an advantage as well. Would you talk a little bit about what categories are you expecting to take some price and if we should look for our overall pricing to lift on some of your core businesses?

Yes, I don’t think we would probably comment on that, Steph. But we carefully look at it every year and right now we're taking a renewed hard look at it, so we will be probably finding areas to price strategically, but it would be about all I say.

Yes, I guess strategically I think we look to make sure we price per value and that's what we would look at if we are taking a price increase to make sure we keep the consumer value equation correct. So, we will be looking that on a SKU by SKU basis.

Thanks guys very helpful.

Thank you. Our final question comes from Drew Crum of Stifel.

Wondering if you guys would be willing to comment on the quarterly cadence of improvement you are anticipating for gross margins as you go through 2017 given the access to inventory that you are dealing with at the beginning of the year. And any comments you have on the outlook for input costs going into 2017?

Yes, I don’t think we're in a position where we'd giving any cadence on margins throughput, maybe we'll have more to talk about when we see you in a couple of weeks. I would say on the input cost side there is little bit of stress right now on resin and packaging and things like that which we've been dealing with, and I think -- have game plans to offset. On the good news side, there is currency devaluating that's affecting labor, so I think on balance we're still pretty comfortable with where we are on our manufacturing converging front.

Got it, and then just one last question. You made a comment that you felt like you had one of the strongest line up of entertainment properties in years and obviously, you have Cars III, aside from that, what else are you excite about as you think about the portfolio of entertainment IP [ph] that you have this year.

Our continued partnership with Warner Brothers is one to really compliment. We had a spectacular year with them, not only with Batman vs Superman, but also DC Superhero Girl, those brands continue into the next several years with theatricals, Wonder Women is actually going to be this spring, Justice League is on the docket as well, which is in our portfolio. Cars III, of course we talk about it, we will continue to talk about it, but we're incredibly excited about that business in 2017. There are a multitude of other really exciting properties as well, Fast and Furious from Universal is coming at us and Nickelodeon continues to have great success in some of their pre-school brands. Without getting into the list that I'm excited to take you through a Toy Fair, what's also really important to notice that we have great pipeline for 2018 as well. Toy story is on the docked as well as Jurassic, which is an incredible franchise that we are anticipating a great degree of excitement and innovation. So, I’ll share more details around our pipeline for '17, '18 and even further down the road, but we are quite confident that this line up is one of the best ones that we've had in many, many years.

Yes, and just to go back to input cost, we are seeing inflation in things like resins and as Chris said paper, as well as a labor in China. So those things are headwinds. We're trying to work very hard on supply chain initiatives to offset as much of that as we can.

And Kevin the pricing increase you anticipate taking the share, that’s an [ph] offset some of those inflationary pressures?

Yes.

Okay. Thanks guys.

Thank you all for joining us today. There will be a replay of this call available beginning at 9:00 PM Eastern time. The number to call for the reply is 404-537-3406 and the passcode is 43079679. Thanks again.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes the program. You may now disconnect. And have a wonderful day.