Welcome to LivePerson's Third Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Katherine, and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. After the prepared remarks, the management from Liveperson will conduct a question-and-answer session, and conference participants will be given instructions at that time. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Matthew Kempler, the Company's Senior Vice President of Investor Relations and Planning. Please go ahead, sir.

Thanks very much, Katherine. This is Matthew Kempler, SVP of Planning and Investor Relations. Joining me on the call today is Rob LoCascio, LivePerson's Founder and CEO and Chris Greiner, our Chief Financial Officer. Please note that during today's call we will make forward-looking statements, which are predictions, projections, and other statements about future results. These statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions as of today and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially due to various factors, including those described in today's earnings press release, in the comments made during this conference call, and in 10-Ks, 10-Qs, and other reports we file from time to time with the SEC. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Also, during this call we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures is included in today's earnings press release. Both this press release and supplemental slides, which include highlights for the quarter, are available in the Investor Relations section of LivePerson's website. With that, I will turn the call over to Rob.

Thanks, Matt. And thank you for joining LivePerson's third Quarter 2019 conference call. This is another milestone for the company as we deliver our second consecutive quarter of revenue growth acceleration. Revenue increased 17% year-over-year in the third quarter, up from 15% growth in the second quarter, and 14% growth in the first quarter. We expect this trend to continue as reflected in our guidance for acceleration to 17% to 22% growth in the fourth quarter, at least 20% growth in 2020. We're really excited to have this goal of 20% growth now within our sites. LivePerson's third quarter activity metrics also reflect the positive growth inflection. LivePerson Signs 7, seven-figure deals in the quarter, more than double than a year ago. The number of deals signed increased nearly 50% year-over-year. The value of contracts signed also continues to grow at a significantly faster pace than our overall revenue, which is a great leading indicator of future acceleration, half of our enterprise customers have now begun the transformation of messaging from Chat, up from 35% a year ago, and more than 50% of those messaging conversations rely on automation. We've always stated that AI was a key to scaling conversational commerce and we are now seeing its adoption drive platform usage. In fact, ARPUs for messaging brands with AI is nearly double that of customers without AI. These trends reflect exactly how we expected the quarter to play out. Demand for conversational commerce is inflecting, because consumers are seeking a better alternative to wasting time on hold with 800 numbers are searching around websites to get answers to the questions they have about the products and services they are interested in purchasing. Brands are equally frustrated with inefficiency and poor outcomes of legacy, voice and web channels. As a result,…

Thanks, Rob. We accelerated revenue growth for the second consecutive quarter highlighting another period of strong execution. The back of this momentum, we're increasing our revenue guidance and adjusting our profit forecast to account for increased investments tied to a market inflection toward conversational commerce and associated sales pipeline demand. Before we dive into those details, I'll first discuss a number of third quarter highlights. On a year-over-year basis, revenue increased 17% in the third quarter, up from 15% in the second quarter and 14% in the first quarter. On a sequential basis, similar to last quarter, we grew 6% from 2Q to 3Q, demonstrating strong layering of recurring revenue driven by our second strongest contract signings quarter ever, topped only by the second quarter of 2019. Deal volume once again rose considerably with total deal counts growing 47% year-to-year, fueled by 33% growth in new customers and 64% growth from existing customers. Our wins are also getting larger. The average signings value increased 38% year-over-year, reflecting our depth and AI capabilities and the breadth of use cases customers are adopting. These catalysts are also reflected in our enterprise and mid-market ARPU, which continued its trend of greater than 20% growth and hit a record $330,000. Revenue retention for that business also remains strong, and within our target range of 105% to 115%. From a geographic revenue perspective, the U.S. continue to accelerate and fuel growth, up 19% year-over-year with our international business, up 14%. As we've stated on past calls, the US is the region where we first invested in go-to-market and therefore ahead in this scaling. 2019, we began duplicating that blueprint in EMEA and APAC and anticipate a similar payback in 2020 in those markets. Looking at our industry verticals, financial services, telecommunications and technology led the…

Thank you [Operator Instructions]. Your first question comes from the line of Ryan Macdonald with Needham.

I guess, just digging into the increased levels of investment in the quarter. I guess, as we look at sort of the cadence of customer summits and sort of the large increase we saw in third quarter. What sort of visibility do you have in this sort of the schedule and cadence of that as we look into the end of the year and perhaps into the early parts of fiscal '20. Just to get a better sense of what maybe levels of spend will be like going into next year? Thanks.

As you'd imagine, we have good visibility into the locations. There is a great deal of planning that goes into the process. But the enlistment or the sign up of customers can be fluid. And with the success that we've had and the campaigns that we're running that wrap around these large summits, we saw very high interest in the quarter for not only those large scale summits that we held in San Francisco and London and Singapore. But as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, we held 20 overall, which is double we had last year. And those can be more micro events that we take LivePerson to a customer, or we do something in between the level of one of those micro events in a large scale. So good visibility to where the fluidity is, how much sign up we get, and what's been I think powerful about those summits. They've evolved from creating awareness and creating new pipe to now we've top put this in our prepared remarks, it's much about creating new opportunities, but then great progression tools. A good indicator of that was a distribution of $3 million of order forms and two contracts that actually closed on the back of our events. So pretty good visibility to wrap up, but we've seen really high interest and that drove the expansion of costs in the quarter.

And then just a quick follow-up. In terms of the metric you gave about a 38% increase in average deal sizes, can you quantify or talk about sort of what's driving that more whether it's customers actually setting up for more interactions or more channels that they're adopting at the initial point of sale? Thank you.

A combination of both, and it was also this quarter driven by both new customers, existing customers, and partner-led sales. So, it was really pretty broad-based across the sales that we saw this quarter.

Your next question comes from the line of Peter Levine with Evercore.

So with the incremental $6 million this quarter, I mean is that in addition to the $10 million you called out in 2Q, and how should we think about investments going into Q4 and perhaps maybe into calendar '20?

So kind of just tracing back, the marketing events were incremental to what we had talked about last quarter. What we didn't have in frame last quarter was the addition of technical resources and the shift we were going to make to bring in-house customer management and renewals in the mid-market. So, we certainly pulled some spend into the third quarter that was planned, but the technical delivery resources and the customer management resources were net new. And you see that then flowing through into the fourth quarter. I think on a macro basis though, if we kind of really zoom out for the investments that we've made this year, we're thinking about them as being in two buckets. First, we wanted to make sure that we put capacity in the system to develop the products that we wanted to bring the market and to be able to execute on the pipeline that we had from a go-to-market perspective. So check the box, I think we've done a really good job. We're now up to 95 quota carriers. The second bucket that I characterize this third quarter and fourth quarter investment now flowing into is, how do you service that demand? And we've received very clear feedback in our Net Promoter Score surveys and we're fortunate to have great customers that take the time to complete them. What they're asking for is depth in industry and depth in our technology platforms. And they're willing to pay for it. So we're reacting to that. And then on this mid-market and small business side, we talked about wanting to bring that business back to growth and it began to return to growth last quarter, accelerated this quarter, it's being driven by really outstanding contract bookings. Now we want to marry that execution up with great contract management and customer service. And we think the best way to do that is to do it ourselves.

Okay. And I think one of the objectives here is to kind of lower the number of concurrent deals, I think reps carry. So I think for you, I mean you call that I believe it was like high to mid teens, where I think the industry average is like 4% to 5%. But where are we today in terms of how many deals reps are carrying? Where do you want to end the year? And kind of, if you think about the building of these pipelines mean, do you have confidence that the investments you're making today that your service org can kind of support these deals going into calendar ' 20?

We definitely do. If you look at where reps -- what reps are carrying today, when we talked last, it was around 15% for new logo hunters each and around 8% for partners. I think we've made a dent in that. But what we're getting better at now as a company, and kudos to our sales leaders. We're starting to get smarter on when we pick up the deal. When that deal gets handed off between the SDR and account rep or the CP, so that we're chasing deals when they reach the right stage of maturity. I think we'd be bit chasing our tail, if we kept trying to keep up with how fast our pipelines are growing with having to continuing to throw bodies at it. So we're trying to get better now and smarter now and handing them off when they're at the right stage of progression and be more efficient that way. We're looking at every single sales rep, every single client partner, every single SDR in the company, their time to first deal, trying to get really smart on what we can do to make them be more successful and ramp quicker.

Your next question comes from the line of Koji Ikeda with Oppenheimer.

Thanks for taking my question guys, and congrats on a nice quarter. I wanted to touch upon the deal metrics. Some of the best we've seen in a while. And the trailing 12-month ARPU increased again. So congratulations there. But billings, even coming on a tough comp, it was single-digits and even looking on a trailing 12-month billings perspective it decelerated. So could you help us bridge the gap between that really good deal commentary and then the deferred revenue and billings built. Thank you.

So we've talked about repeatedly on past calls that internally billings is not a metric that we use to guide our business, it's not a metric that we talk to externally as a view. On a quarter-by-quarter basis, the timing of invoicing, the maturity of customer terms, meaning they extend their terms or their terms narrow can affect that. We do look at deferred revenue obviously and deferred revenue on a trailing 12-month average is up 33%, year-over-year. So again seeing good overall growth there. But again we're just not managing business on the quarter-by-quarter basis and we don't think that metric is something that's relevant to how we're delivering our growth.

Koji, it's Chris. And let's kind of go back into the metrics that you talked about and what gives us the confidence in the visibility that we can continue to accelerate, not just in the fourth quarter but as we said, at least 20% in all of 2020. So as you point out, right, we've now strung together really two bang out quarters of signings. Last quarter was an all-time high, this quarter was second only to that, and it was a pretty impressive quarter in terms of deal counts, new logos up, existing customers up, bigger deals, as you said, the ARPU is climbing, revenue retention was right in the range that we wanted to be between 105% and 115%. But I think when Matt and I look at it in detail, we then start to look at, OK, are you layering revenue quarter-to-quarter. And I think there is some really interesting metrics to us, since obviously second straight quarter of 6% sequential growth. And when you dig one layer beneath that, and you look at the hosting of the software revenue that grew 4% sequentially last quarter and accelerated to 8% this quarter. So, we're confident we have the visibility to continue with our accelerating growth trajectory.

Thanks for that Chris and Matt. And then just a quick follow-up here on the increased spend profile for the fourth quarter. I guess what we're wondering out there is the opportunity looks really, really good. And is there a potential even in the fourth quarter for more pull forward of spend or increasing the spending environment of that overall end market demand still remains really, really hard out there. And then back at the Analyst Day, I know you gave 2020 EBITDA guidance of 7% to 10% margin. I mean, what's the right way to think about that? Any sort of help there would be really helpful. Thank you.

The answer is no. That I don't see us pulling more spend from 2020 into the fourth quarter. And let's kind of go back to in earlier statements we've made. We're really trying to strike a balance of creating a new market, being dynamic and agile and how we invest, but at the same time keeping the right spending controls and investment rigor in place. We think we're doing that well, but at the same time, we've added a lot of capacity in the last 12 months, and there is a point where you kind of move off the dinner table and you just digest a little bit and you assess what you have and you look at the productivity that those resources we're able to drive and I think we're at that point right now. Obviously 2020 is not that far off, but we're at that point as a management team and as a Board evaluating what we've done watching them and trying to enable them to be productive that informs us on how to best go forward with 2020.

Your next question comes from the line of Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum.

So a number of questions from me, maybe one on the lines of the prior question, just with respect to sales and sales capacity, obviously, made great progress in these first three quarters. Just an update on where you think, it sounded like you're going to maybe take a pause in Q4 and think about how does this lines-up for '20. But just any updates on where you think we'll end this year? And then, Chris, maybe just spend a minute on the hard and fast math around will be CAC or LTV-related ratios or other ways, if you look at to give a go-no-go decision on incremental sales heads, maybe in '20?

I think we'll land right around the 100, Jeff. So we're at 95 quota carriers at the end of where we ended the third quarter. I think will be within two on either side of that, right. So I think it's a pretty tight range. And I think as you point out, as we've said, we want to now look at that capacity. We're now measuring on a sales rep basis how long they've been here. We're now looking at the effectiveness of our enablement programs. They're tie into their first deal. How their pipeline is progressing through the system. Those are the metrics right now that we're looking at to be able to evaluate what is their future productivity going to be and are there scenarios where we need to hire ahead of where we don't think someone is going to make it. So we're trying to be balanced in that way. We haven't talked externally about tax in LTVs, it's something that we're doing internally now, something we certainly want to step up and do more of. So I can't comment it on externally, but the metric that we're looking at most right now for the productivity of the sales force is how each rep is working through their funnel with the type of granularity all the way down to how many meetings are setting up and the help that they need to get deals done in surrounding them with the right expertise to be able to close deals quickly.

And then on the CapEx, if I have a right, I think you had guided 42, was it 32 prior and if it was, what was the incremental decision increase there?

Yes, that's correct, Jeff. There is two pieces to it. On the P&E side, where we're making an investment in more servers tied to production. We have customers that are driving very high volumes and we're catching up to that from a capacity standpoint, obviously also with the headcount, that's come on, there's a little bit more on the facility side that we're spending. The other component is the capitalized software that is a little bit higher than we had guided to quarter ago with all the new products coming out and what we're delivering to the market and what we have in our pipeline. There's a little bit more what is being capitalized there.

Competitively, you commented on the leadership position and certainly bears out I think in our field work from what we've heard. But I'm curious, if you could talk about bake-offs what that looks like, who is ultimately there and at least considered relevant by your customer base?

I mean we're still obviously we're attacking the voice providers. So those are the companies that their legacy companies they've been saying in the last couple of quarters that they have messaging and we know messaging is just a delivery mechanism. It's all the AI behind it and everything, but they don't even have that type. They're taking their Chat platforms and sort of trying to make them something that is not messaging, but that's what we see today still, there is really not a change or shift in the competitive set.

And then on the Apple Suggest. I mean, I think you commented about the impact there. I'm curious, to the extent you think the cross-carrier the connect initiative that some of the major carriers came out with on the Google RCS side, just any thoughts there.

I mean, we are directly wired into the Google infrastructure right now. So the Google guest cloud, which is the RCS sort of overlay. And then we are connecting directly into all of the carriers where they're not connected. This is for Android devices, which is about Top 3 billion Android devices. So, I mean it's sort of at the beginning. We have to see how it shakes out. But where we've been working with the carriers because there are customers and wiring in and then also we're wired in the Google. And we are already in the UK, where they launched. And then in the US, we launched a year ago with their first brand on there, which is a big financial services company.

Your next question comes from the line of Zach Cummins with B Riley.

This is Sarkis in for Zach. Thanks for taking my question here. Can you discuss your recent strategic partnership announcement with TTEC? Is there much in terms of maybe customer overlap and what do you view as the total addressable market with that customer base? Thank you.

We are very excited about this partnership. I've known Ken, their CEO for almost 20 years, and they've made a big shift, obviously getting into doing technology and strategic technology and digital consulting for contact centers. And so now it's really an opportunity for us to work together to deliver on the conversational commerce promise, and so we're very excited about it. We're working on deals right now. So we feel like it could be a really great partner for us and we're very focused on it. So, it's good. I don't know, we have internal numbers and we haven't put those out yet, somewhere we'll probably talk about it a little bit more as we get some momentum because we just announced it, but you know that one of the largest providers of technology in the contact centers, obviously, they run large contact centers. We have a lot of overlap with our enterprise customers because they are pretty much in every enterprise in the world in some capacity. So this is really an opportunity to work closely with them on implementing our platform. And also looking at the gain share where we have all the gain share business that we do which in previous call pay for performance. There is also an opportunity to have them service that gain share and then transform live messaging agents into bot builders and automation engineers. And that's really I think the transformation we can do with a partner like that. So we're quite excited.

Your next question comes from the line of Raimo Lenschow with Barclays.

It's Mohit on for Raimo. Thanks for taking my question. I'll offer my congrats on a solid quarter again. So Chris, a question for you. In terms of -- so in Q3 or rather in Q2, you discussed you had laid out some incremental lead investments. And I was wondering if you can give us an update there, how those are sort of like driving an ROI? And also I was curious, so you mentioned 12-month to 18-month product relieve, and I am assuming the competitors are trying to catch up and the market is obviously getting a lot of production. So to maintain that lead, how do you think about product investments in the next year? So if you can unpack that for us it'd be great.

So I'll take the second part, which is the competitive advantage. There is two parts to the platform that are really important. The core is the automation, the AI engine, which we call Maven, which enables these conversations to get automated consumer facing or we help the agent to be more efficient by automating what the agents doing in the console. So that we continue to provide more and more technology. We just provided some technology around, how do you look at it an intent and how do you process that intent. How do you get smarter on how you answer question to the intent. So there is a lot of technology goes into that. And as I talked about on my prepared remarks, our mode is really the data that we have. And the Data Sciences engineering teams are able to take that data and do many things with that that gives them a massive competitive advantage on the AI and automation side because we have hundreds of millions of these digital transcripts. The second part is, we are pretty much almost finished with all the endpoints that we have 13 now endpoints that a consumer can come through whether about social all the messaging endpoints, in-app, web, in the IVR, where we provided now a bunch of those in this quarter. So that gives us our reach. And so when we look at our flywheel to reach, it's the amount of use cases we can do to that reach sales, service and marketing. As we mentioned, again on this call, we now can do outbound campaigning. So it's not all about inbound, we do like outbound marketing campaigns and targeting on the platform. And then the quality of those conversations automation versus human and that's our drives our flywheel. So I think that just gives us a massive advantage in the markets, because we also have many scaled customers now after being about 2.5 years out in the market or so. We take so much of the platform. So we are years ahead when we launched and then we continue to be ahead in what we're doing. So I feel really good and we dropped a lot of product in the last two months. So we're pretty excited about on that side. And the first part of the question...

You were asking about the return on the R&D investments was it something else?

In Q2, you discussed some incremental R&D investments. So I'm just wondering how those are, if comes an update there and how those are trending?

The trending margins, it's basically correlated to what I just said, we dropped tremendous about of product into the market in this quarter. So we're very excited about the investments we're making and the speed in which the products are coming out on to the platform. And obviously we have a future road map coming. So there is -- so we feel good right now about our level of investment and the return that investment is going to make. And that will just drive ARPU. I mean, ultimately when you see ARPU numbers go up lot of has to do with like what are the other things that they're using. We know, as I mentioned also in the prepared remarks, if customer starts with automation, it could be double ARPU, the size of the ARPU versus someone is doing live interactions. So these are all things that the Apple Chat Suggest stuff and preparing for that, that could drive a tremendous amount of volume that will drive ARPU. So this is all the things that are driving. So we feel good about the investment right now.

And if I can ask just a follow-up. I know you may not be ready to talk about like the next year sort like leverage and margins. But high level if I think about the pre OpEx items like S&M, G&A and R&D. Which of those areas you think will be more profitable to see any leverage next year? I'm assuming you still want to sort of like keep your competitive lead in product, so sort of like we will see healthy growth in expenses there. Quota carrier capacity I think you disclosed how you're thinking about that from a LTV to CAD basis and other KPIs. But just any high-level view on which of those three years we might see some leverage next year will be great. Thanks guys.

Look, we did a tremendous amount of investment this year to put capacity into the system and that has to do on the product side, and then it has to do on the quota-carrying website and then the support and field organizations that support our customers. So I think right now we need to see how those investments start to ramp. The trainings with our reps, all the products we've built, we've got to bring them to market sell them. And so I think as a leadership team we're looking at, why don't we just look at how things go now. So I would expect to see some leverage with G&A, I definitely think we're going to see leverage there. But in the other areas we're looking at. But right now we're just really looking at all that capacity. We sort of say front loaded but we loaded it this year and we want to see the knock on effect into next year. So personally I'd like to see how that comes through before we keep adding more and more Apple's down on it, so that's kind of where we are.

I think it's worth emphasizing. When we look at all of our quota carriers right now, the 95 that we have and as absolutely thrilled as we are with how this year's signings are playing out. It's being done with the partial team, barely a partial team. So next year when you look at the charts that we're looking at when people have been hired where they are in their ramping, the full complement of the sales force will now be contributing in 2020, that's exciting to us and we want to see that translate.

Your next question comes from the line of Samad Samana from Jefferies.

This is Mason on for Samad. As you talked about ARPU was up nicely, but they continued to decelerate as continue to signing larger deals and on board then. Should we expect the ARPU deceleration and continue at the same rate as we think about 2020?

I think there's probably with the volume of deals picking up and with mid-market and SMB really starting to accelerate as they have that will bring pressure on the ARPU. So if that's a bigger force then the momentum we have an enterprise in the type of deals, they're signing that will bring downward pressure to it, but it's kind of an amount of time thinking about it.

I agree if ARPU is coming down, it should only be happening if deal counts are going up, because we're signing more new business and more mid-market and small business which come in at lower than the traditional enterprise ARPU. So hopefully that's a positive trend for us. The combination of unit volumes and ARPU should still drive the overall growth measure.

Your next question comes from the line of Brett Knoblauch with Berenberg Capital.

First one maybe, if you just look at your top five largest customers, what percent would you say you're penetrated in these accounts?

If I look at all the use cases sales, service marketing and all the potential endpoints, it's somewhere between 3% and 7% of what we think we can get out of our customer on the messaging side.

And then maybe as you're thinking about proactive and reactive interactions. Is there a mix do you see that falling to and maybe are there just different pricing points between a proactive or like a reactive message or interaction?

I mean, it's we know the proactive gets us into those sales and marketing budgets. So they tend to be a lot bigger than the potential of the care budgets which are potentially inbound. So I expect on a unit basis that the revenue we would make per unit would be higher. And also the volume would be far greater at some scale. Today our entry point still is, each heading into care and then fanning out. The other thing is that the proactive capabilities also intelligence even for care to go back out proactively and from a telco maybe we're having service issues in an area we can be proactive with a lot of intelligence back to a certain customer base. So there's a lot of technology we built, we called fast function as a service. Also you can actually do develop code within our platform and you can connect up your internal CRM, we already have CRM, but certain, but action on it. So you could trigger that there's network outage. Then on the platform it goes, it looks and dips into all the messaging clients that are in that area and then send out a proactive message. So that's all part of the capabilities now with the proactive capabilities we put in there. But the sales, marketing and retail also we see as much bigger opportunities than the care opportunities, but we're beach heading still in on care.

And then maybe just one more on gross margins a little bit of a downtick this quarter, I guess, is there any one particular thing driving that?

The gross margins is really related to that's where those technical delivery experts are residing and what make some unique is, there the type of candidates that can toggle between R&D and delivery, but in their most recent utilization their more focus on scaling and making the implementations go very quickly, which obviously drives faster time for the customers to see value in the platform, which therefore drives more usage. So that's what's driving the margin trends right now.

Your next question comes from the line of Mark Schappel with Benchmark.

Most of my questions have been answered. So Rob, just a follow-up here are finished with product related question. With respect to the Chat Suggest product that you talked about, I believe you mentioned that there is crony for customers using the solution. And I was just wondering, if you just -- was it 40 or...

Yes, what we said is that we've launched with 4 times more times more than any peer.

…is about 30 on it.

But just wondering if you just provide a couple of examples or specific examples of how customers are actually using the solution?

So if you want to use us per se, if you do have -- let's say, a search on the web for LivePerson and you'll see a phone number on our Web site or you see a phone number on Google My Business or whatever it is. When you go to click on that phone number, previously it would pop up a little dialog box on the iPhone says call or cancel, right? Now it has message, call, cancel. So you hit message and then you'll be broad right into the Apple Business Chat, which is iMessage and then you're connecting with the brand. So the brands decide, okay, I'm going to enable certain phone numbers to be Chat -- to be deflected. And then they can also throttle the volume. So you can side, let's show is only to 1% of people who are making phone calls, or certain bots. So they can throttle it and that gives them control over it. But the statistics we have are pretty startling and exciting about like we're seeing how many people are clicking and then interacting. So I think it's the power of it is that, you know we've been very focused on getting rid of it, reflecting 800 calls from the IVR, but this it never goes to the IVR. Call never made it to the IVR made it straight into messaging and then we're using a bot to ask the question, like do you want to sales, what would you like to ask a question. So that's the way it's being used. I think it's quite powerful because it cuts off the call from getting into the IVR.

Your next question comes from the line of Steve Enders with KeyBanc.

I just want to dig in a little bit more on the product side and some of the new initiatives that you're rolling out. Just wondering, as you go to customer and you're taking that if in a social initiatives and email initiatives and we don't see just came out with. What is driving the best interest for them and where do you see the biggest potential to drive growth in the next few years?

So this really came from our customers, which is they have social groups, they've got the email groups, obviously they've got voice groups, messaging group's, chat groups. We've obviously consolidated the messaging and chat groups we've got, they get consolidated on our platform. The social care one actually we've had direct messaging that if you do a direct message with the brand, it would it came on LiveEngage and that's been out for a few quarters. But now what we can do is, in the public feeds where consumer just posts something into a news feed, we can track it, we can reply back and then we can take someone into a direct message. So we have the monitoring capabilities and then the ability to take that in. So what we see is that in the care organizations let's say they don't want to have that group on a separate platform. They want to bring that all into a conversational commerce platform. And then email we've never built an email system in our life. I never want one here at nor did we built one now. We tried to solve the problem of email, we know it's not a great way to communicate, but obviously a lot of emails are going back and forth between brands and consumers. So now we have a way to take that email we ingested into LiveEngage, we then turn it into a conversation that we can send back out. So the reply emails like click here and let's start on messaging conversation that's asynchronous around that email. And then a case is built, so we have the capabilities to keep that email track it, but you take it off of email now and it's once again sitting in that platform and we can then have a full view of a consumer. So now there I got them through Apple Business Chat. But they sent an email now I put them back on Apple Business Chat now I can be proactive with them. They went through social and they posted something on Facebook or Twitter, I'm having a problem with your product. Now I brought them through the messaging channels. So it gets them to have that single view of the consumer from the messaging perspective and then you can do the AI and all the proactive stuff and the reactive stuff.

And that's really helpful. I guess just last one for me. Just wondering how you guys are seeing the current hiring environment and the ability to bring reps into LivePerson?

So we feel good. I mean, we have a good story. If you're on the field side, you can make a fair amount of money, a lot of money, if you're quota carrying rep, because we have a unique product offering and a way to bring it to market. On the engineering side, we've got a great leadership team. We're global now, obviously a great job on globalizing operations. It's amazing is that we opened up an office in Seattle, seems about less than a year ago. And we're almost up to 200 engineers there. So that has been recruited and that's a tough environment. And so I think our story there too that we have this technology, we have this data set. That's very unique. I think people are excited to come here. So it's a tough environment, we were in a very good place and obviously the power of our company is based on the power of our people and how good they are. And so we've been very fortunate to recruit some great people. We've also recently recruited some very good field, senior, senior field people out of some of our call center competitors. And I think we've taken some of their big sales people out. And so they are coming here now to fight the battle. So, I think that's also been a good indicator of what we have to offer in the market.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike Latimore with Northland Capital.

Congrats on the deal growth here. Just two quick questions, one is, you've given a enterprise growth rates for North America in the past, wondered if you have that? And then second consumers really accelerated does that continue to accelerate or is that sort of level out there?

Just hit on the reverse order. On the consumer business, obviously really excited about the five straight quarters of acceleration 37% is awesome. I think it's best to think about the model there, at least how we are right now in the high teens, low '20s? And then we'll see if we can exceed those expectations. In terms of the enterprise growth rate, I would just want to get into the habit, but the trajectory hasn't changed.

Your next question comes from the line of Jonathan Kees with Summit Insights Group.

I'll start with -- and kudos for the quarter. I'll start with the follow-up question first. You guided for Q4 of top line of 17% to 22% and then for 2019 -- actually 2020 of at least 20%. I'm assuming you're still reaffirming your long-term revenue growth of 20% -- excuse me, 25%. And it sounds like there may not be that long-term from now given the growth rates here?

Yes, the 2020 we're reaffirming and the longer-term model we're also reaffirming.

And then in terms of -- I guess more of a deeper question here. You talked about the particular verticals especially financial services. We had like 30% plus growth for the quarter. Just curious why our financial services drop in terms of the percentage of revenue contribution for the quarter, even if it was, especially if it was one of the fastest growing for the quarter?

I guess 22% of revenue in the first quarter, 24% in the second quarter, 21% in the third. I don't think there's anything really to it. In fact, it was we've got a great pipeline of financial services, a good success there and growth is over 30%. So I'm not sure there's anything at least we're not on our radar anyway.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. I would now like to turn the call back over to Rob LoCascio for closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. So, I'll end the call just reemphasizing a few key points. We entered 2019 with stated guidance that we would accelerate revenue growth and we are delivering on that goal with two consecutive quarters of acceleration. We're now introducing meaningfully new product catalysts that will enhance our competitive position and raise awareness of messaging and expose our platform to millions of conversations we previously couldn't touch. More importantly, we are exiting 2019 what we believe is the definitive AI platform for conversational commerce. We believe that automation will be the future business. And our goal is to be the world's leading conversational AI company. Now we have a tremendous opportunity in front of us and we're going to keep focusing on execution, return on investment in order to accelerate the momentum and capture the full demand of this dynamic market. And with that, we will see you in Q1. And as I say on this quarter, November 26th, we do this program since 9/11 called feeding NYC where we feed like over 4,000 families in New York. And if you get an opportunity we've all had a good year. The company is doing great stocks up and all that, but giving back to the communities we serve is important and we've been doing it since 9/11, we spent over 75,000 families in the city, in the shelters. And it's a great thing. So if you're in New York, or you want to come to New York with your families on November 26, we pack Turkey's and take them out and we deliver on door-to-door to all these families who won't have normally a Thanksgiving meal. And if you can donate, if you want to take some of your gains this year and put them back into feedingnyc.org, go there, make a donation. We want to feed tens of thousands of families next year. And we've got big goals, not only about the company, but serving our community. So if you can do that, I'd really appreciate it. And with that enjoy.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you greatly for your participation. You may now disconnect.