Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Third Quarter 2012 Drew Industries Inc. Earnings Conference Call. My name is Chris, and I will be your conference moderator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. And at this time, I would now like to turn the conference over to your presenter for today, Mr. Jeff Tryka. Sir, you may proceed.

Thank you, Chris. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to Drew Industries' 2012 Third Quarter Conference Call. I'm Jeff Tryka, with Lambert, Edwards, Drew's Investor Relations firm. And I'm joined on the call today by members of Drew's management team, including Fred Zinn, President, CEO and a Director of Drew; Jason Lippert, Chairman and CEO of Lippert Components and Kinro and a Director of Drew; and Joe Giordano, CFO and Treasurer of Drew. We want to make sure to take a few minutes to discuss our third quarter results. However, before we do so, it is my responsibility to inform you that certain statements made in today's conference call regarding Drew Industries and its operations may be considered forward-looking statements under securities laws. As a result, I must caution you that there are a number of factors, many of which are beyond the company's control, which could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. These factors are identified in our press releases and in our Form 10-K for the year ended 2011 and in our other filings with the SEC. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Fred Zinn. Fred?

Thank you, Jeff, and thank you, all, for joining us on the call today. I just want to mention that Leigh Abrams, Chairman of Drew, who's typically on this call, is stuck in an airport, unfortunately, so he won't be joining us today. I also want to thank all of you for your patience with us about the hurricane-related delay in issuing our press release and in holding this conference call. I certainly hope that all of you and your families who were in the path of this Hurricane Sandy came through that ordeal safely and securely. Luckily, our operations and the vast majority of our employees, except a handful here in our New York office, were not significantly impacted by the terrible storm. Turning to our results. We are delighted with the continuing strength in the demand for our products, especially in the -- our RV products, in the RV segment, and we're pleased that we have begun to see improved production efficiencies hitting our numbers. Earlier this year, Jason Lippert and his team intensified their efforts to develop and implement action plans to increase efficiencies, and now we've begun to see the results. We still have a way to go, and that's in part because customer demand and, therefore, our production levels has remained very high. For the first 9 months of 2012, our sales increased an unprecedented $180 million and they continue to be strong into the fourth quarter. We're also making progress now improving our production efficiencies, and we're confident that these improvements will continue as we prepare for the 2013 peak selling season. In the third quarter of 2012, our year-over-year incremental EBIT margin was nearly 10%, and we expect our fourth quarter year-over-year incremental margin to exceed 10%. And that's despite the fact that…

Thank you, Fred. As Fred noted, our sales in the first 9 months of 2012 exceeded the full year 2011 sales by $20 million as a result of the 34% growth in sales. This strong growth reflects our customers' confidence in us and widespread acceptance of our product offerings. Knowing that our full year 2012 sales are sure to surpass our previous sales record, some could think we would relax, but that is not the approach here at Drew. While we are pleased with our sales growth to date, our goal is to continue to seek new avenues for growth, such as adjacent markets in the aftermarket. We cannot become complacent, and we are working to continue to improve the level of service we provide to our customers. For example, we recently hired a Vice President of Customer Support Services, who will oversee our customer service, warranty and parts departments, as well as work with our aftermarket support team. Further, to support continuing growth, customer service capabilities have been enhanced by increased staffing, additional space, warehouse improvements and an upgraded phone system. As one of the largest suppliers in the RV industry, our customers expect and deserve the best from us. We are also realigning the footprint of our facilities to gain efficiencies or add capacity where needed. In particular, our furniture operation has grown significantly over the past few years, and we have added space to meet that rising demand. However, manufacturing at multiple locations naturally limited our production efficiencies. Earlier in 2012, we purchased a facility which will be used to consolidate most of our furniture operations during the 2012 fourth quarter. We expect this consolidation to increase our efficiency. We are implementing lean manufacturing initiatives at one of our facilities and beginning to see substantial improvements in…

Okay. Thanks, Joe. Chris, we can open up for questions now.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Daniel Moore with CJS Securities.

Given that the various moving parts and comments that you made with gross margins roughly flat sequentially quarter-to-quarter, would you be able to give some guidance around the direction for gross margins in Q4 relative to what we saw in Q3?

Well, Dan, as you mentioned, there are a lot of moving parts, not only the things that are changing in our business but the seasonality that we're unsure of, raw material costs, a lot of things change. So we really can't and don't give forecasts like that. In general, though, as we said, we are expecting improvements in our incremental margins and in our margins over the coming quarters.

Okay. And then I guess more broadly, up until this quarter, you've been calling out expenses related to unexpected increases in demand for the last couple of quarters. Obviously, you're seeing -- starting to see some of the benefits of increased efficiency. Is there something more structural that's preventing you from getting back toward the higher incremental operating profit margin goals that you had, had in the past? And if not, what's sort of a reasonable time frame to think about getting back into the mid to high teens in terms of incremental operating margins.

Yes, I don't think there's anything structural, really. The only one maybe structural impact that could change those incremental margins is the fact that we're entering new markets. Our growth is depending more heavily on new markets and new products. And in some cases, we're the new kid on the block, where it's the first time or we're early -- in the early stages of supplying a particular product. We have to sharpen our pencils and make sure we are very competitive and attractive to customers. So I do expect that on that growth, the incremental margins could be slightly less. But over time, structurally, even in those markets, we do see that margins should return to those mid- to high-teen levels and then even a little higher. I think that in terms of timing, let's wait and see what happens in the fourth quarter in terms of demand. The demand for our products, our sales have been extremely strong through third quarter, into October and even into November. So, of course, it does take us a little longer to implement changes in the production processes when we're operating at such a high level. But I really do think that -- I understand everybody's questions about the progress we're making in that area. But really, the more important goal is that we have are to make sure that -- even from an investor viewpoint, the more important goal is to make sure that we keep customers satisfied. So we need to understand that some of the costs we have incurred have been to make sure we do that. We also need to focus on a slightly longer-term goal, that we're making sure that we're ready for the 2013 selling season and beyond. And I'm confident that we're doing everything we can. Jason has got his team extremely motivated, focused on that goal. They're working very hard and working very smart to make sure we accomplish it. So whether it shows up in the end of November or the end of January, I don't know. But I do believe that as we get into 2013, we're going to see the benefits, and even way beyond that, we're going to see the benefits of this solid sales growth and the focus on production efficiencies.

And Fred, you alluded to my last question, which is October was extremely strong. What are you seeing so far in November?

It looks good. Jason, what do you see in November from customers?

Yes. The orders are tracking very similar to what we saw in October, but we're going to lose a couple of days because of vacation or Thanksgiving. And Thanksgiving week, sometimes manufacturers take most or all that week down. So -- but the -- our customers, the manufacturers, are happy about where orders are at. They've got lots of backlog and it's going to take us until the end of the year, in most cases. So nobody's slowing down.

Our next question comes from the line of Kathryn Thompson with Thompson Research Group.

Could you comment a little bit on your -- obviously, you talked about gross margins being impacted by the start-up costs or at least trying to adjust production in order to meet increased demand, which is a high-class problem, I might add. But if you could help us better understand the breakout of what was higher raw materials versus start-up costs versus anything else that we might take into consideration.

Yes, we can give you a little bit of help there. You'll see more detail, obviously, in our 10-Q, where we had to break out some of those costs. But in terms of raw materials, one of the things that has impacted raw material this year was scrap costs are very high. It's the same -- for the same reason, we got a lot of new workers, a lot of people trying to force a lot of product through factories. And so our scrap levels went much higher in the first part of this year and second quarter. In the third quarter, they started to come down. So that was a big help. I think now -- Jason, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think, basically, for a good number of our products, our raw material costs are in line with our expectations as a percentage of sales. Some are a little high, some are a little low. There's always some adjustment we need to do, but generally, that's -- they're in line now. Anything you want to add, Jason, on material costs?

No, not on material costs.

Okay. And in terms of labor costs, we saw a nice decrease in overtime, in particular, in the third quarter, especially as we move through the third quarter. So that should continue to benefit us. And overtime hours are way down, even in a month like October where it was one of our highest volume months. We had much, much less overtime than we did in a similar month of sales a few months ago. So that's working in the right direction as well. We did incur in the third quarter more costs to implement the changes. So in the second quarter, there were inefficiencies. In the third quarter, there were some inefficiencies still, and there will be a little bit more. But we're also incurring some costs to consolidate operations into more efficient locations or to change production methods, to implement lean manufacturing, those types of things. So those are...

And a lot of those inefficiencies were directly related to the hire of 1,300 employees and all the training and stuff we have to go through there to get where we need to be, where the employees come to work and they do their jobs more efficiently everyday. So...

I'm going to tell you, that's an astounding number every time I hear 1,300 new employees. Drew is a modest-sized company. We got -- we used to have 4,000 employees, we thought it was a lot, 5,000 plus. It was astounding that we had to hire that many people to keep up with the demand.

And really, the number was more like 1,800, but to get to 1,300, we had to go through that many new hires to get that level of new employees.

And so the ramp-down and the decreased overtime somewhat is a function of new employees coming on? Is that correct?

Yes, probably a little bit. But our employee level was high in the summer, too, earlier parts of the summer and the second quarter, too. But they're much more efficient now. First of all, Jason has done a wonderful job of making sure that we become more efficient. And secondly, they're better trained, so they're more efficient.

All right. Also, could you talk a little bit more what you're seeing from customers in terms of RV product demand? And in the past, you said you're still seeing more of low- to mid-type product? But as the cycle progresses, are you seeing any changes in demand for higher-end-type product?

So you're talking about both the changes in the trends between the travel trailers and fifth-wheel and in terms of how full they are of features?

Correct.

Okay. Jason, you have your hands on the pulse there in terms of the -- particularly, the features that are being added. Are you see any change?

Yes, I think the -- yes, it's a lot like the auto industry. There's a lot of gravitation toward new features and bells and whistles that are drawing more demographics of different buyers to the market. And even stuff as simple as color, I mean, you go back 3 years ago and there really wasn't any color. And today, I mean, there's 20 or 30 different options in color for exteriors. So you're seeing the manufacturers get really creative to drive, I think, attraction to more groups of buyers that may be -- haven't been around the product before. But motorhomes, specifically, you talk about the -- that buyer that hasn't been around for the last few years, and the motorhome manufacturers have recently, over the last couple months, seen a dramatic increase in orders. So to the tune where there -- a couple of the bigger guys are jumping up in the 30% to 50% range in terms of production. So I think that all in all, with the ease of financing and some of the other things that have come back that maybe weren't around in the last few years, there's a lot of gravitation toward units with higher level of content and bells and whistles and things like that.

Yes, and even the numbers that came out today, kind of on a broad scale. The consumer confidence has been better than it had been, and people are starting to feel a little more comfortable and their feeling as if they've waited long enough.

Great. Could you also -- final 2 questions. Could you discuss core demand for Manufactured Housing product and the environment for acquisitions? Is it getting tougher or easier, the type of product it was before [ph]?

Yes. Manufactured Housing, as we -- I think we said in the press release, the production levels were down 5%, 10% in September and October, and it looks like that's almost entirely because of the FEMA orders that were placed until last fall. The core, and I think that's what you're getting to, Kathryn -- the core demand, it's hard to tell whether it's up or down 100 or 200 or 300 units, but from everything we're seeing and hearing, the core demand is -- in the last couple of months, has been relatively stable with last year's demand. And actually, last year was pretty good. I think in October, if I remember right, October and November of last year, even excluding the FEMA units, we were seeing nice increases in production in the industry. So we're keeping pace with that. Oh, acquisitions. Right. Acquisitions, there are still opportunities out there, and each one is unique, it's hard to make any generalizations, but if I had to, just looking at it logically, I'd say sellers are a little more demanding in terms of price. We'll be very -- I wouldn't say rigid, but we have our targets in terms of returns. But sellers are seeing a recovery and they're starting to say, "Okay, well, I want to be paid on next year." Or whatever they might say. And we have to negotiate as best we can. So we make sure we get our returns. The opportunities are still there, and I look forward to more acquisitions over the coming quarters and years. But it might be a little tougher to get a fire sale, but we'll still negotiate good deals.

Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Dodson with Edmunds White Partners.

Can you just talk a little bit about -- you talked about orders were extremely strong and obviously your customers, we can see that. Some of the people that are negative have said that there's -- they believe maybe there's a pull forward that they brought products a little earlier to market, et cetera. I guess, do you believe that at all, first of all?

Well, Jason probably has a better answer, but I'll tell you, overall, everything we've been hearing from analysts, from customers, from lenders is that dealer inventories are in good shape. Inventory turns are appropriate for the levels of retail demand that we've seen and that we've experienced. So I think there's a general -- there's satisfaction with inventory levels and optimism about the future. Jason, have you heard anything different?

Not really. I'd just add that retail seems to be still pretty good right now. So that's really one of the main drivers of whether we feel confident in tomorrow's buyer, not as what are the retail buyers doing today. And they seem to be there, out there buying product or the dealers wouldn't be reloading like they are right now. So...

And then second of all, can you just talk a little bit about -- you alluded to the production increase that you're going through just because of kind of the abnormal seasonality. And can you help us understand kind of where you hope to get to this quarter relative to where you were last quarter from a production standpoint, I mean, how much it will kind of increase sequentially?

Well, this is a seasonal time for our business. So October was very strong, stronger than most October seasons. Probably, part of that is because -- a good part of that is because the RV industry has remained strong. But part of it is that we've gained share in new products, and we increased our content for each RV that is produced. So part of it is the industry, part of it is us. But seasonally, it's going to slow. December is not going to be as strong as November, November is not going to be as strong as October was. There are fewer days, holidays and such. So sequentially, production will be down, and that's -- that will give us the chance to hopefully accelerate some of the process changes that Jason and his team have put in. So we have better efficiencies when we come out in the spring and earlier. Anything else?

Our next question comes from the line of Barry Vogel with Barry Vogel & Associates.

How is White Plains?

White Plains is recovering from the storm. We're all seating here looking at each other. Most of us didn't have power for a while. And it was [indiscernible], but it's getting back.

Okay. The print on your press release needed a magnifying glass.

We did that on purpose. We didn't want you to see.

That's what it looked like to me. So I have to ask you, looking at the towables content for the year, what's your best guess now for 2012 about what the content is going to come out to in towables?

Well, it won't change much from the 9 months. The -- it's a rolling 12-month number, so every time we report -- so hopefully, we'll be up a little bit, but the -- there is some seasonality even in our content. So it's hard to tell. For the 12 months ended September, it was 26.85 per towable RV, travel trailer [ph] and fifth-wheel, we would expect about the same.

And what about motorhomes content?

Motorhomes is another question. Motorhome content peaked or spiked rather over the past couple of quarters, going from $600, $700 a unit a few quarters ago to over $1,000 now. So it's a little hard to peg where that's going to be by the end of the year. We're seeing a lot of good strength both in the number of motorhomes, as Jason pointed out, that are being sold and produced and in terms of our content. So we're gaining ground there. Hopefully, we'll see some growth.

Of course, if you look at the motorhome statistics, relative to the peak in 2004, it's still way, way, way below. It's almost like they haven't even had a recovery.

Yes, well, from what Jason is saying and from what I've heard elsewhere, at least the first signs of -- what are they called? The green shoots? The growth is at least expressing itself. We'll see if it's a continuing trend, but it does -- at least for the past few months, a quarter or so, it does seem as if the strength is starting there.

Okay. And then as far as content for Manufactured Housing, what's your best guess per unit?

Yes, it should stay fairly stable. I don't know whether it will be up $20 or down $10.

Where is that price? Where is that content?

It was mid-$14...

About $14.60 right now. So $14.50 to $14.70 is the reasonable range at this point.

That's all, $14.70?

Yes.

Yes.

And that's per housing unit?

Yes.

Yes.

Okay. And Joe, can you give us the D&A for this year? You talked about next year, but you didn't give us the D&A for this year.

Yes, the depreciation and amortization for 2012 expect to be in the $25 million to $26 million range.

Okay. And the effective tax rate for the fourth quarter and the year?

Well, for the year, I'm expecting around 37%.

And what about the fourth quarter?

Our effective rate for the quarter should be somewhere in the 38% to 38.5% rate. Yes, 38%, 38.5%.

It was lower in the third quarter, but it will balance out to about 37%.

It's obvious that you've been digesting all these acquisitions, and you haven't made too many acquisitions this year. And I understand that you want to digest what you did, which was phenomenal. But going forward, besides growth through acquisition and growth through investing in new products, et cetera, where do you stand on a potential dividend?

It's a good question. It's on everybody's mind. We're in a very similar position as we were at the end of 2010. We've got some excess cash. We're not using our lines of credit. Congress is trying to figure out what the heck to do with dividend and capital gains rates. And that's just where we were at the end of 2010. So every board meeting, for the past several, the board has considered it and will continue to consider it.

Why wouldn't you start off with a small dividend? It's obvious that with this artificially low interest rate environment, engineered by Bernanke, people want income, dying for income. That's why you have this tremendous movement into corporate bonds every month, $5 billion or $6 billion or $7 billion of mutual funds that traffic in bonds come in and money for the equity retail funds go out for equity mutual funds in the United States. So it's totally clear that investors want income, so why not give a small -- start a small dividend? What's your risk?

Well, there are some arguments for a dividend, either a special or a continuing dividend. There are some arguments against caution. We are, I would say, cautious by our nature, but we prefer to grow by acquisitions and internal growth. And the best time to do that is when everyone else is suffering. So you want to make sure you have a strong balance sheet and the ability to take advantage of opportunities when the world is suffering.

But your industry is not suffering right now.

Our industry is not suffering right now, but on a long-term basis, we would expect that -- we want to be ready, rather, to take advantage of a downturn.

You're being overly cautious, Fred, overly cautious.

Some would say that.

No, you can do both. You can pay a small dividend, and you can -- you make...

Well, I don't -- I really don't mean to marginalize your comment, Barry. It's a very important comment. And I can tell you that it is on the -- has been on the agenda of our board, and they are considering very seriously what to do with the cash. So I'm not saying we won't do it, I'm just saying there are arguments on both sides.

Whatever happened to the extrusion investment that you talked about last year? Whatever happened to that?

It's still going on. We're making improvements, we're adding to a certain capacity for certain parts of it that we feel we need and we expect to see further improvements over the next few quarters.

How much have you invested so far in that extrusion project?

Do you know the answer, Joe? It's about $17 million?

Yes, somewhere I was going to say $15 million to $17 million.

It's really -- it's for 2 reasons: One, it gives us much better control because we're using -- right now, we're using almost all of the output for our own needs. So small amounts going out to customers. So it gives us much better control over the inventories and the deliveries of the aluminum. And eventually, we'll see the results of that on the bottom line as well.

Now can you say that when the year is over, you will have a profit from the extrusion investment this year?

I don't think we will this year, no, no.

Is it losing less money than last year?

So last year was really...

It was just start up. So it wasn't around much of last year.

Can you tell us roughly what you'll lose this year?

We don't have that for disclosure right now.

Our next question comes from the line of Barry Kaplan with Maple Tree Capital.

I just wanted to clarify that your comment about the fourth quarter incremental margins of 10% -- first of all, that was EBITDA margins, did you say?

I said EBIT. Same would hold for EBITDA, but in terms of the last quarter, I think, or, excuse me, in the third quarter, our year-over-year incremental margin was just about 10%, just short of 10%. And that we expect it to be higher than that in the fourth quarter year-over-year.

That was kind of my other question. What exactly do you mean year-over-year? Because seasonally, third quarter to fourth quarter typically...

Yes, you can't. Sales -- right. So we're just -- we have to look year-over-year there.

So incremental revenue year-over-year would be [indiscernible].

So in the -- I don't remember exactly the numbers, but in the third quarter, compared to last year's third quarter, our sales were up by approximately $60 million, and our EBIT was up by something like 5.7%, if I remember right, so 9.5% or so. And we would expect north of 10% in a similar calculation for the fourth quarter. And I would say meaningfully north of 10%. You never know what's going to happen, what opportunity or what cost will arise. But as we look at it now, I would say we would expect meaningful better.

And would you expect that from there, you need to be incrementally higher than that?

Yes.

So it's on a...

Let me take that back a little bit because we'll have the seasonal fluctuation. So not that -- the difference in the seasonal flow of sales in the RV and Manufactured Housing industry, over the past few years, the seasonality has changed, what I'm trying to say. So that could affect the year-over-year incremental margins. But putting that aside, so if you look at it over a slightly longer time frame, I would expect certainly incremental margins to improve from there.

I mean, well, that almost hit the fourth quarter last year. The overall EBITDA margin was 8%.

EBITDA margin was 8%?

Yes.

Yes. But here we're talking about EBIT margins, EBITDA, I don't remember exactly what it is. But...

EBITDA margin should be higher, obviously.

Yes. Yes, right.

So the other question I had really was just, do you have any thoughts about -- in terms of what you're seeing in terms of the availability of financing, both at the retail levels, at end users or customers? And [indiscernible] dealers themselves and their own [indiscernible] of financing. And is that part of what's driving, is the improved availability part of what's helping demand?

Well, I don't think so really in the last few quarters. I'm not on the leading edge there. Don't forget, our customers are not dealers. But from what we're hearing, it's -- from analysts, dealer surveys and other analyst reports, I think financing is a lot better than it was a couple of years ago and basically stable with where it is -- has been over the past quarter or 2. Jason, have you heard anything different?

No, I'd say that it's improved marginally over the last year, for sure, and definitely over the last couple of years, but there's only positives right now.

Yes. I don't think that's what drove, Barry -- I don't think that's what drove higher demand in the third quarter and in October. Relative to earlier this year, I think that retail demand is up, people are getting a little more confident. They waited a long time, maybe some pent-up demand. And on top of that, there have been those who have said that the units that were financed 4, 5, 6 years ago have been paid down to [indiscernible], have been paid down to a certain extent. And used prices apparently are pretty good. So it gives people more -- a better opportunity to trade up.

And the only other is you don't expect to have any impact meaningful from the hurricane, either on your expenses or essentially revenue.

Yes, it's a good question. I don't think so. Everything I read in -- about the impact of the hurricane on the economy is very confusing. I read something this morning that said it's expected that the impact of the hurricane will reduce growth, the GDP growth by 1%. At the same time, in another article I read this morning, that it's expected to help GDP because of all the housing and repair and infrastructure work that needs to be done. So it's very hard from a broad -- from kind of micro level of our own business. FEMA, maybe they'll order more units. It won't be a meaningful impact on us. And who knows whether it will help or hurt in RVs. Jason, do you hear anything else beyond that?

No, I -- and we typically do because if there's something that's going to be done, it's usually right away, and we get a phone call from one of our customers seeing that we service everybody. So...

Yes, in terms of FEMA, particularly. Yes.

In terms of FEMA.

And there won't be any particular [indiscernible] that you have in White Plains.

No, none of their facilities -- no, we didn't have any damage here in White Plains. Damage to my home, a tree came down on my deck, but other than that...

I'm still sleeping in my skiwear.

Our next question comes from the line of Mark Fife with EnTrust Capital.

I just wanted to see if you could reconcile something for me. Your sales have been outstanding, your customer sales have been outstanding and yet you said in the press release that retail demand from the dealers, retail sales were up 5%. You said on the call that inventories at the dealers are in good shape. How does that math work, when...

Yes, it's a good question. I think the level of inventories -- measuring the level of inventories by historical retail demand doesn't make sense, just like we build our inventories today as a manufacturing company to meet demand tomorrow. So if retail demand tomorrow is expected to be higher, then dealers need to carry more inventory. And from what we've been hearing from the dealer surveys and from lenders, inventory turns and inventories at dealer levels remain fairly good, appropriate, let's say.

So what you're saying -- I'm sorry, dealer inventories are higher than they might have been in the past, but they expect increased sales in the future to make that make sense?

Yes, that's part of it. Joe and I are both kind of jumping to answer the question. There's another part of the equation, and Joe, you correct me if I'm wrong here, but you don't know today because the industry does not have good statistics on the absolute level of the other inventories. So were dealer inventories a year ago 12,000 units too low? I don't know. Are they 6,000 units too high today? I don't know. But the best information we have, and it's pretty good, is to listen to those dealer surveys and lenders, and they are telling us that dealer inventories are appropriate, even though they're up from last year.

[Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from the line of Ethan Steinberg with Drew Industries (sic) [Friess Associates].

Well, I know you're with Friess. So...

I've a got a few, I think. I guess I'm still a little confused on how much cost pressure from the efficiency efforts were in the quarter. Can you give us just a sense of how much that dragged on you in dollars? You mentioned there was -- just one of them was $800,000. But what were they if you had tried to add them all up?

It's about the same as it was last quarter. Joe will pick up the numbers. But the composition is a little different. So last quarter was almost all lower production efficiencies because we're working so much overtime. In this quarter, it's some of that and more moving costs to rearrange facilities and to consolidate operations that are in numerous facilities and implementing lean manufacturing initiatives and the like. But it's about the same as it was last quarter.

And how much was it last quarter?

Is it $0.13?

Yes, we talked about $0.13 [indiscernible].

The reason I don't want to focus on $0.13 a share is because, really, what we're telling you there is that if everything went very, very well compared to how it went and from all perspectives, and we didn't have any of these costs to implement changes, we could have been, let's say, $0.13 better, give or take, this quarter. But things never go perfectly well. There's always going to be an area of our business where we have to increase capacity, tack on a new facility. Whatever it might be, there always is something. So that's a measure that I don't think you should hold us -- you shouldn't expect that we're going to achieve perfection.

Okay. But I'm -- I guess I'm thinking about it. If it was a similar dollar drag but the incremental margin went from 0% or 1% to 10%, it was -- can you talk about what were those offsetting benefits? Because on a net basis, you still did a lot better on that incremental margin.

Yes. Yes, that's true. But don't forget, the incremental margin depends partly on how we did last year as well. So last year's third quarter, we did -- we had some inefficiencies as well. So it's a blend of all of that. Some of the benefits in terms of our improvements Joe has talked about, whether it's the significant reduction in scrap costs, overtime costs that are way down, we're not talking about small dollars there. We're talking about on the order of million of dollars for those types of improvements. So the overtime rate is way down, in October, even better. But some of it has to do with what happened last year, too.

Okay. And then the incremental, you said, would be above 10% in the following quarter. I assume -- can you give us any sense what the run rate of those expenses -- are they much lower today or coming out of the third quarter than they were for the average of the third quarter?

They're probably a little bit better, but sales were very high in October and running high now. So, again, there are significant costs -- or at least a good part of the extra costs are fixing costs. The actually moving production and such.

Okay. And Fred, I think you said eventually return to mid- to high-teens margins. Were you talking about total EBIT margins or incremental margins?

No, our peak EBIT margin, if you look back over the years, for a year-on-year basis, was just a tad short of 10%. It was 9.9% something. So we've never, in terms of EBIT margins, achieved above 10%. But I was talking about in terms of mid to high teens or a little better I think I said is incremental margin.

That's what I thought you meant. And then can you remind me, I forgot -- the growth year-to-date has been consistently over 30% each quarter. It actually accelerated a little bit year-over-year in this last quarter. Is there something -- was there a weird acquisition contribution that's helped -- that we're lapping or anything?

Yes. So if you -- in the press release, I believe we said that in October, for instance, sales were up, I think we said, about 35%, and that acquisitions did not contribute because we lapped the significant acquisitions in August.

And so the month of October, sales organically are up 35%?

Yes.

And they were up about 35% for the Q3, but how much did the acquisition compare...

[indiscernible] So what was it, Joe?

It was 27% without the impact of acquisitions.

And so it is accelerating. That's just that year-over-year or seasonally adjusted demand being -- feeling particularly strong?

Probably. And I think that we're continuing to gain market share, both in our core markets of -- and the fringes [ph] of our core markets in motorhomes and in the adjacencies that we've talked about over the past few quarters.

And we have no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to the speakers for any closing remarks.

Well, no closing remarks, but I do want to thank you all for your attention and your interest in Drew and for participating today. You had some good questions, and you always keep us on our toes. And I look forward to speaking with you on our next conference call when we report the fourth quarter and full year 2012 results. Thanks again.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference. Thank you so much for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.