Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Intrepid Potash, Inc. Second Quarter 2022 Results Conference Call. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to Evan Mapes, Investor Relations. Please, go ahead.

Thank you, Angela. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining us to discuss second quarter 2022 results. With me on the call today is Intrepid's Co-Founder, Executive Chairman, and CEO, Bob Jornayvaz; and Intrepid's CFO, Matt Preston. Also available to answer questions during the Q&A session will be our Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Zachry Adams. Please be advised that our remarks today, including answers to your questions, include forward-looking statements as defined by U.S. Securities Laws. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be materially different from those currently anticipated. These statements are based on the information available to us today, and we assume no obligation to update them. These risks and uncertainties are described in our periodic reports filed with the SEC, which are incorporated here by reference. During today's call, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial and operational measures. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in yesterday's press release. Our SEC filings and press releases are also available on our website at intrepidpotash.com. And I'll now turn the call over to Bob.

Devin, thank you very much, and good morning to everyone joining the call, we really appreciate the attendance and interest Intrepid. I'll begin my remarks with recent company highlights then move to broader macro and market commentary and then with the financial results before passing the call on to Matt. The first half of 2022 has no doubt than exceptional foreign traffic as the company's $92 million in adjusted EBITDA is the best first half performance in a decade. With the debt free balance sheet $85 million of cash as of July 31, and a positive outlook, we're in a great position to pursue internal growth projects and opportunistically return capital to shareholders. We have $35 million in the share repurchase program, approved by our board and given the oversold market conditions that exist in the stock market, we firmly believe that buying back shares is one of the best ways we can deploy capital. Now on to the macro. So far this year, fertilizers have gone from a relatively quiet space within the global commodity market to continually making headlines. The unabated impact on fertilizers and grains from both sanctions on Belarusian potash in the Ukraine conflict has been the biggest agricultural story in 2022. While the food crisis in Sri Lanka has shown the vital role that fertilizers play in affordable food production. They've also made the headlines. At Intrepid, we take great pride in being the only United States based potash producer and one of the two commercial [indiscernible] on producers in the world through our Trio product. Focusing on our domestic market. The United States farmer economics continue to be quite strong, based on USDA operating cost and yield projections, farmer cash market margins are projected to be historically high this year and next, supported by…

Thanks, Bob. As Bob discussed, Intrepid delivered another quarter of strong financial performance, primarily owing to strong average net realized sales prices for Potash and Trio. Reviewing our potash segment in the second quarter we generated $25 million of gross margin on 56,000 tons sold. Sales volume was below prior year as we simply had less potash available to sell after our 2021 evaporation season, and with fewer tons in inventory to start the year. We also saw customers more reluctant to replenish Potash inventory after the spring season, instead choosing to wait for field programs to be announced. In late July, an MOP program was announced an early response to the program has been measured, as distributors work through carryover inventory from the spring, and customers remain cautious around credit and inventory exposure. As a result, it's still too early to guide to Potash sales figures for the second half of 2022, while we expect activity to pick up as harvest progresses and as we move into the fall application season. In our Trio segment, second quarter was another period of good application and owing to very good demand over the past 12 months, our granular inventories were near the floor at the end of the second quarter. We experienced more seasonality with our Trio product, with sales weighted towards the spring. So unsurprisingly, we expect customers will be cautious in the near-term and look to reengage our needs as we move into the latter part of the year. Production rates remain steady and with inventory space available, we expect to maintain our increased operating shifts and production rates for the remainder of the year. Putting this all together for a forward outlook, while it's still too early to guide to more precise levels of demand and sales figures, we expect the strong financial performance to continue, which should drive continued high levels of cash generation and allow us to fund our capital program and other initiatives through cash from operations. Moving on to capital allocation and liquidity, our priorities are unchanged. reinvested in the core business and internal growth projects, opportunistically returning capital to shareholders and maintaining a strong balance sheet. We incurred approximately $17 million of capital expenditures in the second quarter, and now expect our full year investment of between $65 million and $75 million as we accelerate more sustaining projects into this year and with the addition of the sand project Bob discussed. As for liquidity, yesterday, we closed on an amendment to a revolving credit facility, which increased the size of our facility from $75 million to $150 million and extended the maturity by three years to August 2027. With much uncertainty in the financial and capital markets, we felt this was a prudent move to help ensure strong liquidity and access to capital. This concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, we're ready for the Q&A session.

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Joel Jackson with BMO Capital Markets.

Hi there. This is Alex on for Joel Jackson. Thanks for taking my questions. I have a couple of, if I may, I will start one by one. Given the stronger financial results that we've seen and much more cash building on the balance sheet. Can you maybe walk us through what your plans are with the cash? And how are you thinking about the pace of share buybacks for the remainder of the year?

I guess all I can say is that we're going to be very opportunistic. We think that our stock is a great value right now, given everything that is going on. And our ability to invest in organic projects as compared to buying stock allows us both opportunities, given our strong free cash flow generation. In terms of talking about the pace of it, our primary concern is to make sure that we're opportunistic, as we're in a volatile stock and stock market environment. So Matt, I don't know if you want to add to that at all. But…

It's a good question, Alex. I mean, kind of just go back to my prepared remarks. We certainly have a big capital investment program for the second half of the year, roughly, go and get up to $65 million to $75 million. And then as Bob said, we'll just remain opportunistic. We're not going to provide specific guidance on timing for share repurchases but see great value in that and look forward to executing that program as the months progress.

Okay, appreciate that. And for my second question, could you maybe provide a bit of color on some of the evaporation actually you'd like if the situation has changed or has improved? And maybe can we expect similar sales volumes in that case for the rest of the year?

Yes, pull back to just the evaporation issues. I mean, we certainly have been clear on our last few calls around 2021 and significant rain we had at our Carlsbad facility. For those familiar with our story, we've had so far a great 2022 with good early season evaporation, and as we get into the late season, we never want to get too far ahead of ourselves, given some of the monsoon rains that can happen at our Carlsbad facility. So far it's been a good year and we'll wait to see where it ends up. I mean, all things being equal, we should return to more normal levels of production with this 2022 evaporation season. As far as sales, like I said in my prepared remarks, we're not going to guide on second half just given where the market is today, but certainly expect pretty strong demand when sales pick up and then very positive outlook heading into fall and spring of next year.

Got it. And lastly, maybe you can comment a bit on what you think pricing will be in Q3 given what you're seeing today and maybe how that might change in Q4, as some of other competitors have noted some increase in Q3? I was wondering if you're expecting the same or average selling price?

We're just seeing a very strong market and given our size, we're trying to be as selective in our sales to always achieve the best netback opportunity that's out there. So by being a smaller player, I would hope that we can continue to -- I don't want to say cherry pick but stay on the higher end of the market that's out there. I think everyone in the fertilizer production business believes that we're in for several quarters if not, I don't want to go so far as to say years, but definitely several quarters ahead of us of continued firm pricing.

Okay, great. Thanks so much.

The next question comes from Vincent Andrews with Morgan Stanley.

Hey, guys, this is Will Tang on for Vincent. Thanks for taking my question. So you made some comments on the press release about credit/possible inventory exposure for customers contributing to demand headwinds. I'm wondering if you could give us a little bit more color on what's happening there and then possibly what that means for -- I guess a trough demand season, I guess in between peak demand seasons as we exit this fall between that this fall and next spring?

Yes. And this is Matt. We're coming off really 18 months of very strong demand in our potash Trio markets. So a compressed spring here, certainly high prices, like I said in my prepared remarks, everyone's going to delay application decisions, looks to move everything back-to-back just in time as they can. So, in July time period, it's a normal lull in the market, maybe a little bit more than we've seen in past years just given like I said, 18 months of really strong demand. So I would say it's not unexpected, guys want to just be cautious, see what they can do on just in time basis as harvest progresses in the U.S., we certainly think the overall farmer distributor demand will pick up significantly and it was just a matter of time given underlying crop economics and overall very supportive environment.

Got you.

I guess to add to that. It's not like we're seeing a pullback in stated demand that will occur, what we are seeing is just in time purchasing. And so we're just trying to make the market aware, as we said in our remarks that it's going to be a choppier order book because people are managing working capital in spite of generating very, very high margins. And so there is a yin and a yang and but we are seeing people manage working capital and that's, I wouldn't say call it a debt crisis, a debt limit, debt constraint, I wouldn’t use any of those terms other than we're seeing more people focus on the management of their working capital.

Got you. Okay. And then, I guess we're coming up on some of those stated potash capacity expansion/cost reduction projects coming into service over the next few months. Could you give us an update on where you are in the construction process for each of them and then particularly with respect to Wendover, which I believe got pushed back from being in service from the third quarter to the fourth quarter now?

Yes. They're out there as we speak on that deep brine well and so we've got operation staffs that are out there as we speak. Quite frankly, I don't know if we're actually drilling or mowing and de-mowing and so but it's happening any day now is the best way to put it.

Yes, probably a little bit more color on our Moab Cavern we expect to have that again in service at the end of the year very perceptive on the Wendover deep brine wells. We did move that from Q3 to Q4, that's really like a late September into an early to mid-October. So not a significant push back there, as we see just really getting the electrical and that's the main thing, we're on-site doing the drilling either, have already started or just about to so. It's a very minor delay, just from like I said, late September into October. And then on our HB facility, yes, remain on track there first half 2023 with kind of the full system and I think we'll look to kind of piecemeal that in with some replacement pipeline hopefully by the end of this year and get that full system in by mid next year.

Got it. Thank you.

I wouldn't say there's any major delays, we're looking at a few weeks here and there but nothing as it relates to that we feel like are significant in terms of delays.

Yes, thank you. I appreciate the color.

The next question comes from Josh Spector with UBS.

Yes. Hey, guys, thanks for taking my question. Just thinking about Potash production and given levels you've been at, what would be the max production you think you could actually have available to sell for the second half? And I guess related with some of the timing and the questions around summer-fill and just in time demand, is it actually better for you if you build inventories that sell later, if prices are higher and you avoid that summer-fill discount, or is that worse for you? So, curious on that dynamics. Thanks.

Well from production availability, I mean, we started up at HB facility this week, we'll start our Utah facilities towards the end of August, early September given the way the overall solar evaporation process works. We'll be producing at our standard normal rates from startup until the end of our harvest. When you have an evaporation season it's whether above or below, it just sort of extends how long your harvest will last into the spring of the following year. So production will be normal levels here in the back half of the year just given the dynamics of producing out of our solar evaporation ponds and then sorry, Josh, the other half of your question was?

Is more just a dynamic of summer-fill versus selling later, so to the extent that you guys only have so much production? I was just curious if Potash prices stay stable, is it actually a better earnings outcome if those tons are delayed into the fall when prices, when you'd avoid like the summer-fill discount, I mean obviously, there's working capital ramifications there. But curious if, does that logic check out? Or is there something I'm missing in that thought process?

You definitely have the right logic and you're looking at it right. I just don't want to make a big deal that's going to have a material change to what's already going to be a very strong third quarter. And so I don't want to put it out of perspective the fact that we chose not to participate in summer-fill program in a material way. This leave us inventory be able to sell into a strong fall market that's going to happen, but I don't want to make it out like that's going to be a huge mover is definitely a benefit, is definitely positive but I can't really quantify the size of the potential increase.

No, that's fair. And I guess just curious on, if you have a normal production season in the fall, you have your projects in place, if you were to think about your potash cost per tons this year versus next year, what would be kind of the buckets of what those things would add or I guess reduce your cost versus this year?

Yes, it's a fair question. Certainly one we've touched on in the past. We still believe we should see our cost per ton on potash that start to decrease here in Q3 and Q4 as we get back through those tons we produced during our down 2020 evaporation season. As far as dollar numbers for next year, just still too early to guide on that, we'll see where this evaporation season ends up. But we do expect, as we said on previous calls to see some improvement in there, as we start to sell off of our 2022 evaporation season here in August and September with the recent startup of our solar operation facilities.

Okay. And if I could squeeze in, I guess one more just the frac sand project, is there any way to size what that could be in terms of revenue in earnings such this, frankly that market I'm super familiar with potash would look like? Thanks.

Yes, given the fact that we are in basin and literally -- our sand mine is going to be surrounded by active rigs, I think it is very, very fair to say that we should see minimum margins generated in the $20 to $30 a ton in terms of margin generated. As you know, sand pricing ranges anywhere from $60 to $70 all the way up to $150 a ton, depending upon where you are. The majority of that is in logistics costs. So once we're in the market, we know that prices are going very, very high. That's why we'd like to focus some sort of minimum margins. We feel very comfortable that we're going to generate these minimum margins. I don't know if that answers your question or not.

Yes, no, that's really helpful. Appreciate it. Thanks.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Bob Jornayvaz for any closing remarks.

I just want to thank everybody for participating for their interest in Intrepid and wish everybody a pleasant day. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating and have a pleasant day.