Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the Ingredion First Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call. For the conference, all the participant lines are in a listen-only mode. There will be an opportunity for your questions. Instructions will be given at that time. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. I'll now turn the conference over to Ms. Heather Kos. Please go ahead.

Good morning and welcome to Ingredion's first quarter 2017 earnings call. Joining me on the call this morning are Ilene Gordon, our Chairman, President and CEO; and Jim Gray, our Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer. Our results were issued this morning in a press release that can be found on our website, ingredion.com. The slides accompanying this presentation can also be found on the website and were posted a few hours ago for your convenience. As a reminder, our comments within this presentation may contain forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those predicted in the forward-looking statements. And Ingredion is under no obligation to update them in the future as, or if, circumstances change. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed during today's conference call or in this morning's press release can be found in the company's most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K. During this call, we also refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted earnings per share, adjusted operating income, and adjusted effective tax rates, which are reconciled to U.S. GAAP measures in Note II, Non-GAAP Information included in our press release and today's presentation appendix. Now, I'm pleased to turn the call over to Ilene.

Thanks, Heather, and let me add my welcome to everyone joining us today. We appreciate your time and interest. I am pleased to announce Ingredion ended the quarter with solid adjusted operating income and adjusted earnings per share. Volumes grew by 5%, driven by core, specialty and acquisition related volumes. The TIC Gums and Shandong Huanong integrations are underway. And we completed the Sun Flour rice acquisition in March, strengthening our capability to produce higher value specialty starches. Rice is an on-trend ingredient that's been used more and more in high margin foods and clean label applications. Additionally, we purchased over 1 million shares during the quarter, consistent with our desire to offset dilution over time. Overall, I'm pleased that our business model and strategic plan continue to deliver shareholder value. Now let's spend a moment on each region's performance in the quarter. Operating income in North America was $160 million for the quarter, up $11 million from last year. Overall volumes were up 5%, driven by our TIC Gums acquisition and organic growth in our core and specialty ingredients. Continuous improvement initiatives and lower input costs continue to drive good operational efficiencies throughout the region. The TIC Gums integration is underway, further enhancing our texture capabilities and enabling us to deliver custom solutions faster. In South America, operating income was $14 million, down $4 million from last year. The macroeconomic conditions continue to be challenging in the Southern Cone, especially in Argentina. Pricing actions, good cost discipline, and continuous improvement projects partially offset higher corn operating and other input costs. We implemented organizational restructuring actions in Argentina to continue to right-size the business. The Southern Cone economy remains challenging as economic measures lowered consumer disposable income and continue to affect our margins. We continue our focus on all executable…

Thank you, Ilene. Good morning, everyone. Let me start by covering the highlights of the income statement. Net sales were up $93 million for the quarter. Higher volumes in all four regions and favorable foreign exchange in three of our four regions accounted for the increase. Gross profit was higher by $13 million as a result of higher volumes in core and specialty ingredients, as well as the inclusion of TIC Gums volume. Reported and adjusted operating incomes were $195 million and $212 million, respectively. Reported operating income was lower than adjusted operating income by $17 million. And our reported and adjusted earnings per share were $1.68 and $1.88, respectively. These differences are largely related to pre-tax restructuring charges of $11 million in Argentina from employee severances as we take action to improve efficiency and lower our operating costs. And we had pre-tax expense of $7 million for integration and acquisition costs, including the fair value markup of acquired TIC Gums inventory. Moving on to the net sales bridge, our sales of approximately $1.5 billion were up 7% versus last year. Volume and foreign exchange contributed $71 million and $29 million, respectively. This was slightly offset by $7 million of price/mix. As we look more closely by region, you can see unfavorable foreign exchange only affected us in EMEA, predominantly driven by the British pound valuation. Volumes were up in all four regions. In North America, volume was up, driven by organic growth and our TIC Gums acquisition. In Asia Pacific, volume was up given our specialty capacity expansion. Price/mix was relatively flat overall. In North America and Asia Pacific, price/mix was down due to the pass-through of lower raw material costs. For the quarter, reported operating income decreased $5 million, while adjusted operating income increased $11 million. North America…

I'm pleased with our results this quarter. From a strategic perspective, our business model and blueprint for growth are working. Our momentum continues on a positive trajectory and we continue to transform the business. This quarter included the business results of TIC Gums and Shandong Huanong acquisitions. And we closed on the purchase of the Sun Flour rice business. Our global footprint and customer diversity balance regional and sector risks. Our innovation capabilities and portfolio of on-trend ingredients gives us a competitive advantage. We continue to grow our on-trend specialty ingredients, expanding our texture, wholesome, sweetness and nutritional offerings. And our network of Ingredion Idea Labs enables us to collaborate side by side with customers, adapting innovations from country-to-country, while customizing solutions to local preferences and tastes. From our foundation of operational excellence, we continue to optimize our cost structure for the future, while investing for growth in our specialty business. With our strong balance sheet, we expect to continue deploying our capital for growth, acquisitions, share repurchases and other actions to deliver excellent shareholder value. And now, we're glad to take your questions.

First we'll go to Rob Moskow with Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Hi. Thank you. The dialogue on your stock really that I have with investors always seems to focus around the risk to the NAFTA agreement and what might happen between the U.S. and Mexico. Can you give us an update on what you've heard so far about Mexico's intentions regarding more action against HFCS specifically related to this tuna issue with WTO and maybe nothing's happened yet? And then I had a couple of questions about the guidance I'll follow up with.

Okay. Thanks, Robert. I'm always happy to start off and then I'll turn it to Jim. And you know that we always talk about how high-fructose for beverage is less than 10% of our business. But nonetheless, I know that question is still there. And there are a number of issues as it relates to NAFTA. And, certainly, right now, there's uncertainty, as you've said, about how NAFTA – our U.S.-Mexico relations might evolve. We've said before we support free and open trade. It's also important to remember food is a local business and we manufacture ingredients around the world. And we have a presence in 40 countries – sell to customers in more than 100 countries. And the vast majority of our ingredients are made and used locally. And we think that our geographic diversity balances country-specific headwinds. Nonetheless, there is a lot of discussion going on. So, why don't I turn it to Jim and he'll give you some of the data that we have?

Sure. Thank you. Hey, Rob. I think that the talk around this has varied a little bit. Let me just put it in our perspective which is, in Mexico, HF corn syrup competes with domestic cane sugar. The tariff would increase the HFCS price to Mexican companies. There could be some price elasticity which could kind of lessen some demand. However, we believe a tariff of 18% imposed by Mexico on imported U.S. HFCS could back up some demand into the U.S. You'd have to believe that this tariff lasts the entire year. And if you do that and you work through some of the math, we believe it's less than 3% of the industry's corn wet-milling capacity because really I think that's the challenge that we face, is how you look at corn wet-milling capacity. As a reminder, our HFCS sold into beverage is less than 10% of our net sales. And we're really the only local HFCS 55 provider in Mexico. Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Okay. I appreciate the color there. I know it's a couple of tweaks to your regional guidance in Asia Pac and Europe. These are small things. But I think Asia Pac, before you were saying that you thought that your profit would be up because you could fully pass-through or I guess you could fully cover your FX headwind, but now you're saying partially offsetting FX. And then in Europe, it seems to go the other way where you're saying now you're up instead of slightly up. Did I catch that correctly that one's a little better, one's a little worse?

I think that we're still positive on Asia Pac. Maybe that was kind of a reference to the net sales than what's happening with net sales. But we really think that for Asia Pac, it's still fairly healthy business. We have specialty investment that's ramping up and we really like kind of our position in ASEAN (20:10) as well as in China. For EMEA, I think, the income is kind of – it was modest before and now it's up. Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Modest, yeah. Okay. So you're more positive on EMEA than before.

That's correct. And that's... Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Yeah.

Some of that's where we're seeing some of maybe the FX pressures are a little bit less. Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Okay. So more positive on EMEA and no change to Asia Pac?

Correct.

Yeah, because – and I would say on Asia Pac, the customers are very open and encouraging as it relates to healthy solutions and recipes. And so we see those trends very positive and we're able to work very closely with customers on healthy ingredients in Asia Pac, in addition to EMEA, but we continue to feel that way about Asia Pac. Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Got it. Thank you.

You're welcome.

Thanks, Rob.

Our next question is from David Driscoll with Citi. Please go ahead.

Hey, David.

Hey. Thank you and good morning. I wanted to start off with operating margins. The business was so strong on margins last year and we're seeing a little bit of softness on gross and op. And I think you said in your prepared remark that the problems here were mainly South America. But can you talk bigger picture about what you expect for margins both gross and operating margins as the year progresses? In South America, do you expect it to be a continued headwind for the entire year? A little color there would be helpful.

Sure. I think if you look at the press release and what we disclosed, the operating income by regions, we are up on our operating margins in all three regions but South America, right, if you do the math on that. So really the Q1 headwind was kind of South America's gross and operating income margin decline. Some of that exacerbated in Q1, as well as in Q2, as we're looking at costs that we incur in Argentina as we're dealing with the labor issue that we have at our two facilities. I think as we get through winter in South America and we get more into kind of spring/summer, we should see some volumes naturally due to the seasonality kind of pick back up. In that time, we'll see hopefully the margins we would expect would be kind of improving more. But it's going to be a rough time in Southern Cone throughout the year as we're addressing the current labor. I think in the other regions, though, I would expect kind of modest margin improvement. Just to remind you that it kind of depends on – we really look at constant dollar margin is what we're managing the business to, David. So if I'm going to have some movements in corn, I'm passing through some prices, my net sales is going to change. My price/mix is going to change. But I'm really focused on my constant dollar margins. But, generally, we're looking at improving the constant dollar profitability of the business in the three regions. And that's impacted, obviously. As we grow the specialty business, we're going to get favorable dollar margin improvement.

But I would also add, in South America, the demand from GDP growth and growth to specialty in Brazil and Colombia continued to be positive. So we do see dynamics down there where people do want healthy solutions. Colombia has a GDP forecast of over 2% and Brazil certainly positive, not negative, but not that robust. But still the demand for both specialty products and healthy eating are there.

If I could just follow up on the specialty side, first off, just I'd make a comment that so many investors ask about specialties. I think it would be terrific if you guys would add to your disclosures in every quarter comment on the growth of specialties numerically as a separate callout from your geographic disclosures. That would just be my suggestion, but it comes from a lot of investors. And then I was hoping that you might actually just discuss in a little bit more detail what areas your specialty portfolio business was doing very well in, so emulsifiers, hydrocolloids, starches? I mean it's a rather substantial portfolio of different ingredients. Is there any callouts that you can say that are particularly strong right now?

Well, I would say, as a leader in textures, we continue to be able to deliver a lot of recipes with texture. And this can be in anything from dairy to baked goods. And using our different raw materials, because we now have the capability that where we manufacture, having just completed the rice acquisition to have both rice, a very clean taste. We have the potato starch gluten-free non-GMO, the cassava and the corn. So we give customers choices in that. And so the texture area, I think, continues to do very well. Now, we also look for these emulsifiers, as you mentioned, as a growing area. And so as beverages are diversifying with whether it's flavored water or other types of juices, our emulsifiers are a key ingredient in many of those applications. So, I think, again, it's all about the consumer trends of healthy eating that continue to go. I don't know, Jim, if you want to add anything.

I would just add also that we've been working on non-GMO. Obviously, we have a lot of experience in non-GMO starches. We've been working on non-GMO syrups. And we've made some really nice progress there over the last year-and-a-half. And that's kind of a very exciting and interesting area for us as well.

Thanks for the comments.

Sure, David.

Next, we'll go to Ken Zaslow with Bank of Montreal. Please go ahead.

Hey, Ken.

Good morning. How are you? Sorry. I think I was on mute. So my first question is just talk about the pricing dynamic in North America, just something – was it just mix or price/mix was down a little less than 1%, but not a big number, but just trying to figure out if there was anything to do more on the mix side or price side that we should be just aware of on that? And then my second question is can you talk a little bit more in detail what you're doing to restructure the Argentine business?

Sure. So, two questions. Maybe I'll take the first one and then we can both talk to Argentina. Hey. So, in Q1, really for North America, it's really just the layout of the corn. We're seeing corn a little bit less in this Q1 versus the prior year 2016. And in some of our grain-related contracts we just passed that through. So we're really not concerned about that change in our net sales around price/mix. As we stated in the last call, we were pleased with 2017 contracting. Maybe moving on to...

Yeah. I'll start off on Southern Cone and talk about Argentina and then turn it back to Jim who spent some time there recently. And the reality is, Ken, that our business in Argentina – our labor costs are higher than we think is right to compete in that market. And so, we've made a concerted action-oriented plan to work closely with local management and the unions and even the government to really right-size that, because we think the demand for products long-term will be very positive as the Macri government works through some of the dynamics in the industry. But in the meantime, we need to right-size our cost position. So, as you can see this quarter, we went to the point of notifying where we had excess labor and to work through an orderly change in that. And so, that's what we're in the middle of right now. But to be a long-term effective competitor, we need to right-size that labor force. And so, that's some of the dynamics. This is a good time to do it, take the action. But long-term we think the demand will be there.

And maybe just to add that long-term, I think, we had previously laid out that in Argentina where we look at corn, corn is very attractively priced in Argentina from a cost perspective relative to kind of rest of the world. Argentina itself tends to be a sugar market for kind of sweetener demand and we look at our fructose pricing relative to sugar. And sugar – it has recovered a bit. It's moved up given the changes that the government put in place with regard to export back a year and a half ago. So long-term, strategically, we think the fundamentals of demand are still healthy in the marketplace. We just need to focus on our cost management, so that when the demand and the utilization come back that we are prepared to be a very competitive cost provider.

Did you provide parameters to – net of investment and savings that we'll get to see over the next year or two years? How does the progression work?

We have not provided that parameter. I would say that one of the things that we're looking at is we took an $11 million employee-related severance restructuring. I would say that as you think about the Argentine precedents, you're usually at 100% of kind of a statutory severance for that employee. So we're looking at a substantial amount of improvement if we can get through this agreement with the union.

Great. Thank you.

Sure.

You're welcome.

Our next question is from Brett Hundley with Vertical Group. Please go ahead.

Hey. Thank you. Good morning, guys.

Hi, Brett.

Good morning.

I just wanted to stay on that topic for one second and talk about maybe the challenges that have been in place and developed in South America. And, Ilene, whether or not that's changed your strategic view at all maybe as it relates to a pivot towards more of a divestiture mindset? Maybe divestitures are too strong of a word. But, seemingly, you might have an opportunity to alter your mix in South America or apply capital in different ways. Have you thought at all about changing your manufacturing footprint down there, using this as an opportunity to alter your mix? I understand the long-term potential of that operating area, but more wanted to look inside of that and talk about how you might look to change mix and update your footprint.

Yeah. No, good question. And over the last couple of years, we've certainly been focused on the right actions to deliver value to the customers and then shareholders, obviously, in South America. And, of course, altering our footprint in Brazil was a key step when we shut down two smaller facilities last year. And so we're better positioned today to serve the markets. But certainly this focus on specialty, I think, and I've talked about this before, will have a bigger opportunity down the road in South America. And so we are positioning ourselves with our Idea Labs, with people, with recipes, and moving recipes from one area of the world to the other to serve customers in South America. So, while it's early stages and it's actually growing nicely from a small base, we see the growth of specialty, let's say, in dairy is an example and other types of sweeteners, so that we think that in South America that will be important. And therefore that was part of rightsizing, let's say, our modified starch capabilities in Brazil when we shut down one facility and moved some assets. It took some time to position ourselves there. So, that will be important ongoing. And, of course, Colombia is one of those areas with a very nice demand and set of specialty opportunities. And as an example, we serve the cassava market there with gluten-free non-GMO type products and have a wonderful team there, very focused on delivering value to those customers. So, strategically, we really believe in South America. It will get to the right point at some point, so we don't know exactly what date in terms of GDP growth. But in the meantime, we want to optimize our footprint, optimize our cost position, which is what we're working on now in Argentina, and then have the right assets to grow in the specialty area.

And, Brett, I'd just add maybe as the new CFO, we're also – if we can't look at our near-end and our longer-term plans with regard to cost management, as well as our marketplace and the position, we're always going to be disciplined about our return on capital employed.

Yeah.

And looking at all of the options around that. It's nice with some of the trading regions that we can – that exists in Mercosur that we can provide specialty products from, either within South America to Southern Cone or we can actually do that from other locations. But we will always be disciplined about looking at ROCE.

That's good to hear. And then, my other question for you, guys. I wanted to come back to the contracting question in North America that tends to get brought up a lot. And I think some people probably get frustrated by your answer that food is local because the real concern obviously is that one type of product, and in this case HF, the concern is that that comes back on to the U.S. market and hurt supply-demand dynamics potentially at whatever degree for one of your main operating areas. And I can also understand why you guys would take issue with the discussion of HF specifically because of how you've changed your mix over time. So, I think, the correct discussion for you guys is really the contracting backdrop for specialty starches and specialty sweeteners. And so if you agree with me on that, can we maybe talk about what's happening with HF specifically across the border, across the Southern border, and maybe how that ties into contracting for specialty starches and specialty sweeteners? And what I'm really trying to get at here is, are they – have they been disconnected historically and are they even more so disconnected now? And can you describe the backdrop that you see for those specialty products as you maybe go into contracting for those into 2018? Because I think that's the real topic that people need to be talking about as it relates to your company.

Maybe I'll take the lead on this one. I think that's a very insightful question. When you do think about HF and in particular HF 55 which is really a great solution for beverages, there are a few customers and suppliers and that one tends to go back and forth across the border. Because it's big, it seems to get kind of a benchmark in terms of maybe where the market's at for kind of overall price levels. I do think that there is some separation. In particular, when we look at the current suspension agreement and/or if there's any type of restriction of cane sugar into the U.S. or sugar prices go higher, when we look at our customers, it's different sweeteners that are corn-derived that could be potential substitutes. So we're not having an HF discussion. We're talking about glucose and other types of products that may be in higher demand in the U.S. if there's any type of sugar volume that's held up in Mexico. And when we flip it and then look at HF, we're very happy with our local business in Mexico and how we're looking at both our specialty starch in terms of being able to offer solutions to our customers that may actually take some calories out. And we've talked to a little bit about how we've looked at the obesity tax in Mexico and some of the novel solutions that we've come up with there. But we're also very much focused on our overall native starch and a bit of our kind of more customized or specialty sweetener business in Mexico.

I guess the other thing I would add, and we've said this before, is that the way that we're configured with the capital-intensive front-end grind, we like that we're able to redirect some of that capacity if needed to balance our system. In some cases, it takes adding finishing capacity which is quick and not expensive, but that we have a lot of choices. And so you're right. There was a discussion obviously on the high-fructose side, which again is a smaller percent for us. We're growing specialty starches, but we have modified starch capability and capacity for that and can grow that as we deliver value to the market. And so, that's where our focus is and developing recipes for that area will continue to be our focus.

Thanks for your comments.

Welcome.

Next, we'll go to Adam Samuelson with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Adam Samuelson - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Yes. Thanks. Good morning, everyone.

Hi, Adam. Adam Samuelson - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Maybe staying in North America, in the quarter, the volumes organically up about 2%, which would actually be a little bit better than what you would see from food and beverage companies that have reported in terms of what you'd see in the scanner data on an infill basis. Maybe talk a little bit about U.S., Mexico, specialty, non-specialty product lines where you're actually seeing some of that growth in what's been a pretty tough food and beverage backdrop that's out there?

Yeah. I would say that there's two areas in particular, some which we've talked about and some we haven't. And that is certainly the opportunity for non-GMO that Jim talked about a few minutes ago. And what's interesting is – and people ask me, is there a science between GMO, non-GMO? And no, there isn't, but the consumer perceives that non-GMO, the whole recipe will be more healthy. And so, that's what's driving the demand and we're one of the few companies that can really deliver that with our manufacturing capabilities both U.S., Canada, and some in Mexico. I think the other areas when you focus on the organic and, again, taking out the acquisition is our focus on medium and small-sized customers and that was one of the important logic behind the TIC Gums acquisition. Sure, the idea of having hydrocolloids and different texturizers and blending systems is important. But I think even more important is that it brought us the right way to deliver value to those medium and small-sized customers that are growing, that are delivering value in new brands. And so we are working through on how to accelerate that. And I think that is what's very exciting to us. And we've started to do that in the last year and we'll accelerate even more with the TIC Gums acquisition. Adam Samuelson - Goldman Sachs & Co.: That's helpful. And then maybe following – going back to this question about Mexico in a different light. And I think in an earlier question, you alluded to maybe roughly 300 basis point or so capacity utilization kind of that's at risk if HFCS exports to Mexico are backed out. And if you go back, that's a little bit smaller but not that much smaller than the impact of the cargo plant coming off a couple years ago. And you also talked about redirecting that front-end grind to other products and how that was fairly easy to do. I guess the question is if it's not that complicated to do and the high-fructose volumes end up being more important for your competitors than yourselves just in terms of the overall mix of business, what's going to stop them from redirecting that and providing a more competitive environment across the balance of the portfolio in North America? I'm just trying to make sure I understand that balance.

Yeah. So, Adam, I mean, I can answer half the question because we have a position in Mexico and we would look at our demand. But I can't really determine what our competitors would do, right. I'm comfortable on our U.S. position in terms of our customer relationships both on HF, but also in terms of other sweeteners both large, medium and small customers. We work very hard on our customer experience. We work very hard on our availability and our and our service elements to differentiate the fact that we're there, ready for our customers with solutions 24/7, right. So, if there's happenstance that HF demand backs up, I think, we're going to just continue to play our game, focus on our customer relationships. And we're going to continue to run our business in Mexico. And we're going to continue to run our business in Canada, too, because we have to think about all three countries that are within NAFTA. Adam Samuelson - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Okay. That's helpful. I'll pass it on.

And we'll go to Akshay Jagdale with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning.

Good morning.

Good morning.

First, I just want to make sure I understand the guidance correctly and then I have a couple of follow-ups. So you put your guidance up on the bottom-end up and there's some moving parts, lower share count, higher interest expense, I think, which offset each other. But, basically, your underlying EBIT guidance is higher despite, from our perspective, what seems to be generally inline quarter with a more negative outlook on South America. So, when I put all of that together, it seems like, to me, that the core U.S. or North American business, you have probably a better view or more confidence in the middle to high-end of your view there. But can you just help me with that a little bit? It looks like the North American outlook is better than it was before and that's driving your change for EBIT guidance. Is that the right way to look at it?

I think we have a more positive view on both North America, APAC and EMEA, right. So, we look at all three of those regions as doing quite well. And, obviously, we're cautious about how South America, in particular Southern Cone, Argentina, will turn out. But we kind of – we believe that we've taken in some of the downside risks into account in our guidance range. And then just to emphasize, you are correct that we have fewer shares outstanding, but we really do look at the kind of the increase in our financing cost as almost those are a bit of a wash. I think we are looking at – we had tax favorability in Q1. Our tax rate – effective tax rate still is kind of at the 30-ish percent range. And so we'll how the Mexican peso plays out during the year, but I really can't predict where the Mexican peso is going to wind up balance of year. But you're right. I think we are very positive on those three regions for 2017.

Thank you. And then just as a follow-up to that. Your guidance also implies an acceleration in EBIT growth at the consolidated level from sort of mid-single-digit to almost 10%. I think it is 10% for the rest of the year. Is that just – and again, we know – you commented quite a bit on South America. So, I understand the trajectory there is maybe improving in the back half. But it looks like the acceleration, again, is going to be driven by North America, EMEA and Asia Pac. What's driving the acceleration? Is it just sort of how the comps on gross corn cost, et cetera, and EBIT growth comps play out or is there some underlying pickup that you're expecting?

I think it may be a little bit about how the corn lays out by quarter because, I mean, I think we're really still sticking to kind of $7.50 to $7.80 EPS for our range. And then, what we always would see, I think, throughout the years is kind of continued specialty growth. And as that dollar sales of that business becomes bigger, then that may impact our margins favorably. But, generally, I would say we kind of stick to our full year guidance range.

And I would say, as we've talked about last year, we brought on some new specialty capacity in Asia Pacific and in Indianapolis. And so as those assets have come online and we're qualifying the different recipes, as we start to sell products towards that capacity, that's part of the equation of how the year ought to unfold. And so, that's included in all of that guidance.

Okay. Just one last one on South America and this is more sort of long-term. So I'm interpreting your comment as the pricing dynamics or where your pricing is today, you don't think is structurally challenged. And please correct me if I'm wrong there, because when I look at the numbers over the last five years, obviously FX has been a huge drag and pricing has yet to fully catch up to that. So there was this whole issue with sugar prices that were low. I think that has reversed. But where your pricing is today, you feel that's not a structural impediment. Is that a fair comment? And then, to complete that picture, basically, what you're saying is you're addressing the labor costs and the costs that you can control. And over time, as demand picks up and utilization picks up, you'll see margin improvement. So is that how we should think about it? Because I believe there was a pricing issue a year ago and has that now changed?

Yeah. So let me maybe just break it down in terms of – because you asked the South America question, but I really have kind of a tale of two cities. If I look at Brazil, what we've had was some changes in corn in our pricing. Sometimes that corn changed because it's maybe dollar-denominated and you get a change in the reais. You get a lag. I think we're catching up there and I think our pricing – our margins are kind of in line. The dollar margins are in line with what we would hope for in Brazil. I think Colombia and Andean are very similar. So, that's kind of one city. In Argentina, Southern Cone, in that sub-region that we comment on, what we really comment there is we look at what the local price of sugar is relative to world market and then how our high-fructose that we sell into that market is priced relative to that sugar. And I do think there, we have actually seen an increase in sugar, an increase in high-fructose prices. And they're relatively in line. So I don't think that we have any kind of structural headwinds against us there. And that's why when you maybe stare at the South America disclosure on our net sales variance you're seeing both positive foreign exchange but also positive price/mix. That's unusual, right. So normally you wouldn't see both. So I just thought I'd break that down for you a bit.

Thank you. I'll pass it on.

Okay.

Our final question will come from Farha Aslam with Stephens. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning.

Hey, Farha.

Good morning.

Couple questions. First one, in the quarter, did you benefit from a competitor's plant being down? Did that help that core volume number at all?

We wouldn't see that, Farha. We are contracting with customers. We get our kind of a normal volume flow from kind of within our kind of customer expectations. So, I don't think that we would normally see that come through.

Helpful. And then the TIC Gums acquisition – this is really the first quarter you've had that you're in. Could you talk about – is it growing that 5% you expected it to in 2017? Is it really going to add about $0.05 to $0.06 to EPS this year? Could you just give us more color on that TIC acquisition?

I'll start out and then Jim will chime in. But as we said last year, we just completed the acquisition at the very end of the year. So yes, you're right. It was our first quarter. And I believe that we dialed in the $22 million for the year that will be – and most of the integration, the synergies, are more in the sales side, a little bit on the cost side. So, again, it's early days. We're working on the recipes, the R&D and the different customer mix, but it's very much on track to what we expected.

And we guided on that one was $0.04 to $0.05 accretive, right. So if you take the OI that we've talked about, including the amortization of intangibles, and then we net kind of what our expected financing costs would be, that's how we get to our $0.04 to $0.05 on that.

Helpful. And my final question is on fiber and hydrocolloids. Since (53:02) the market we're talking about fiber and hydrocolloids being pressured, are you seeing pricing pressure on those two product lines? Are they significant product lines for you?

We haven't spent a lot of time talking about fiber. It's a very small business for us. And hydrocolloids also is small for us. So it will be a little bit more important with the TIC Gums because we believe that's the way to deliver different texture value to us, but relatively small in the scope compared to our texture portfolio which has really been a leading portfolio. And so, we haven't had any headwinds there.

Very Helpful. Thank you.

I'll now turn it back to Ms. Heather Kos. Please go ahead.

So let me just sign off here. I want to reiterate our confidence in our business model, strategy, and long-term outlook. We remain keenly focused on value creation and delivering that value to shareholders. And I'm also excited to announce officially our November 14th as our upcoming Analyst Day in Bridgewater, New Jersey. So we hope you'll all put that on your calendar and that we'll see you there. So that brings our first quarter 2017 earnings call to a close. Thanks again for your time today.

Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude your conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.