Kenneth Lovik
Analyst · KBW
Thanks, David. As David mentioned, it was a strong quarter with record net income of $13.1 million and $1.31 diluted earnings per share, which included a $2.5 million pretax gain on the sale of our corporate headquarters. After taking into account this onetime item, adjusted net income came in at $11.1 million, and adjusted diluted earnings per share was $1.11, increases of 6.2% and 5.7%, respectively, from the first quarter. Profitability continued to improve with fully taxable equivalent net interest margin increasing 7 basis points sequentially to 2.25% and adjusted return on average assets of 1.06% and an adjusted return on average tangible common equity of 12.79%. Looking at Slide 4, related to revenue and drivers of revenue growth we have outperformed a peer group of similarly sized institutions on a year-over-year basis, and we expect this trend to continue once each of the peer institutions have reported results for the second quarter. Turning to Slide 6. Total loans at the end of the second quarter were $3 billion, a 3.3% decline from the first quarter and relatively comparable to June 30, 2020. The decline in loan balances from the first quarter was driven largely by net payoffs in our health care finance, single-tenant lease financing and public finance portfolios as balances were down $54.3 million, $28.2 million and $25.5 million, respectively. Additionally, small business lending balances were down $9.2 million, largely due to $16.2 million of PPP loan forgiveness but partially offset by new production. Increases of $24.4 million in commercial and industrial and $14 million in investor commercial real estate loan balances partially offset the overall decrease in the loan portfolio. Consumer loans decreased modestly compared to the first quarter due primarily to continued prepayment activity in the residential mortgage portfolio. We did, however, see an increase in origination activity within our specialty consumer lending business with trailer balances increasing $5.3 million or 3.7% from the first quarter. Moving on to deposits on Slide 7. Overall, deposit balances were down slightly from the end of the first quarter, and again, we saw improvement in the composition of our deposit base. During the quarter, CDs and broker deposits decreased $75.5 million or 5.1% on a combined basis while non-time deposit balances increased $64.1 million or 3.7% on a combined basis. CDs and broker deposit balances continue to decline as higher cost CD maturities were either funded with on balance sheet liquidity or replaced with much more attractively priced money market accounts, checking accounts and lower rate CDs. This deposit migration lowered our cost of interest-bearing deposits 13 basis points in the quarter, and we expect to experience continued reductions in deposit costs throughout the second half of the year. Compared to the first half of 2020, we've realized $16.6 million of deposit interest expense savings to date and expect to realize around $26 million for the full year based on the current deposit pricing environment. Turning to Slides 8 and 9. Despite loan balances declining over the quarter, net interest income and net interest margin on both a GAAP and fully taxable equivalent basis continue to increase compared to last quarter. As you can see from the net interest margin bridge on Slide 9, deposit pricing had the largest effect on margin during the quarter with a positive impact of 11 basis points. Although loan yields were up 3 basis points from the prior quarter, the all-in effect of the loan portfolio was a negative impact of 6 basis points, driven by volume as average loan balances were down $62.8 million or 2% from the first quarter. The average balance of interest-earning assets was relatively flat compared to the first quarter but a shift in the mix of interest-earning assets resulted in a 5 basis point decrease in the yield. The decrease in the average balance of loans was essentially offset by growth in average cash balances, which increased $69.2 million from the prior quarter. As cash balances continued to increase during the quarter, we deployed about $200 million of liquidity into 15- and 20-year agency mortgage-backed securities in mid-June, which should have a positive impact on the earning asset mix in the near term. Looking ahead to the second half of 2021, we project our yield on interest-earning assets to remain relatively stable as we expect to deploy liquidity to fund new loan originations as pipelines continue to build. Overall, we are pleased to have delivered a 7 basis point improvement in our fully taxable equivalent net interest margin during the quarter and expect the upward trend to continue throughout the second half of the year. Turning to noninterest income on Slide 10. Noninterest income for the quarter was $9 million, up from $8.4 million in the first quarter. However, as mentioned earlier, included in those results was a onetime pretax gain of $2.5 million due to the sale of the company's corporate headquarters. Adjusted for that sale, noninterest income was $6.4 million, down $1.9 million from the prior quarter. The decrease was driven primarily by lower revenues from mortgage banking activities but was partially offset by an increase in gain on sale of loans. Mortgage banking revenue totaled $2.7 million for the second quarter, down $3.1 million from the prior quarter. Interest rate lock and origination volumes during the quarter were off the record high levels we saw in the past few quarters, mostly due to lower refinance activity as well as limited housing inventory in the marketplace. Furthermore, competition has intensified, which has put significant pressure on our margins. Although there may be volatility in mortgage banking revenue, we expect it to stabilize during the second half of the year. Gain on sale of loans totaled $3 million for the quarter, up $1.3 million or 75% from the first quarter as we sold a larger amount of the U.S. Small Business Administration 7(a) guaranteed loans at higher premiums. With respect to noninterest expenses, shown on Slide 11, the decrease on a linked-quarter basis was driven primarily by a decline in salaries and employee benefits and deposit insurance premium, which was partially offset by increases in marketing, advertising and promotion expense. The decrease in salaries and employee benefits was due mainly to a decrease in medical claims expense during the quarter, while the decrease in deposit insurance premium was due to the decline in total assets year-over-year. The increase in marketing expenses was due to higher mortgage lead generation costs and increased sponsorship initiatives. Now let's turn to asset quality on Slide 12. The credit quality improved during the quarter, mainly due to the resolution of a number of legacy nonperforming loans. Nonperforming loans declined $5.4 million or 37% compared to the linked quarter due primarily to positive developments related to a single tenant lease financing relationship and a commercial and industrial relationship, both of which have been classified as nonaccrual. The single-tenant lease financing relationship included 2 loans 1 of which was paid off at net book value and the other was transferred to other real estate out. The commercial and industrial relationship included 4 loans, 2 of which paid off during the quarter. As a result, nonperforming loans now represent 31 basis points of total loans, down from 48 basis points in the prior quarter. In addition, we eliminated $2.9 million of specific reserves related to these loans. Net charge-offs increased by $2.5 million in the quarter and net charge-offs to total to average loans increased to 35 basis points from 2 basis points in the first quarter. The increase in net charge-offs was due primarily to the single-tenant lease financing relationship that was resolved as the loan payoff and the transfer to other real estate owned were recorded at net book value, which consisted of unpaid principal balance, less specific reserves. The provision for loan losses in the second quarter was $21,000 compared to $1.3 million for the prior quarter. The decrease was due primarily to the $101.1 million decrease in loan balances but was partially offset by continued upward adjustments to certain qualitative factors in the allowance model. Although the economic outlook continues to improve, and we have seen positive credit quality trends within our portfolio, we recognize that certain aspects of the economy have yet to fully recover and the potential still insist for future pandemic-related disruption. Because of this, we felt it was important to continue to maintain a larger qualitative reserve until there is a greater consensus on the overall health and direction of the economy. I would like to point out that had we not made these further adjustments to the qualitative factors in our model, we would have recorded a negative provision of about $800,000 for the quarter. Overall, the allowance for loan losses decreased $2.6 million during the quarter and the ratio of the allowance to total loans decreased to 95 basis points from 1% as of the prior quarter. Excluding PPP loans, which totaled $39.7 million at quarter end, the allowance coverage ratio was 96 basis points, down 6 basis points from the linked quarter. The decline in the allowance was driven primarily by the removal of the specific reserves discussed earlier as well as the decrease in total loan balances, which included declines in certain commercial loan portfolio -- portfolios with higher allowance coverage ratios. These items were partially offset by the upward adjustments to the qualitative factors in the model, which resulted in a 6 basis point increase to the allowance coverage ratio related to the general reserve on the company's commercial loan portfolio. With respect to liquidity and capital, as shown on Slide 13, our overall capital levels improved and remain healthy at both the company and the bank. With the strong earnings performance this quarter, our tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio increased 31 basis points to 8.43% from 8.2% in the first quarter. Additionally, tangible book value per share increased to $35.92 up from $34.60 in the first quarter and just over 16% higher than 1 year ago. I would like to wrap up my comments with a few thoughts on the balance sheet and revenue initiatives we have implemented over the last several quarters that position us much better to perform well in a variety of interest rate environments as shown on Slide 14. First, as compared to the last time interest rates began to consistently increase, we have significantly improved the composition of our deposit base. Our efforts to drive growth in small business and consumer money market and checking accounts, have reduced the need to fund loan growth with CDs, which experienced much higher pricing betas in the last rate tightening cycle. Second, we have made a substantial investment in building a sustainable SBA lending platform that has grown and diversified our noninterest income and should provide a level of stability to overall revenue in times of interest rate volatility that may compress net interest income. And third, we have increased our focus on building lines of business with higher yielding variable rate and shorter duration loan originations. Retained SBA 7(a) balances priced at healthy spreads over the prime rate and our growing construction line of business are examples of these efforts and are expected to become larger components of our loan portfolio. Overall, we believe that our balance sheet and sources of fee revenue are in a much better position than they were several years ago, and we will continue to build off the improvements made over the last several quarters to create a franchise that will deliver high performance regardless of the interest rate environment. With that, I'll turn it back to the operator so we can take your questions.