Michael Brigham
Analyst · SER Asset Management. Please go ahead with your question
Great. Thanks, Joe. I appreciate the opportunity to provide some updates on what is going on at ImmuCell. The press release and the quarterly report on Form 10-Q that we disclosed last night cover the key financial highlights and all the details. As you may know on April 7, we issued a press release covering our preliminary top line sales results. We have been making these optional announcements to give investors a very timely look at what I view as the most critical measure of our operations and financial performance, that being product sales early in the reporting period. Again, product sales are down 16% compared to the first quarter of 2020. I should note that sales during the first quarter of 2020 benefited from some ending inventory going into the quarter on hand as of December 31, 2019. While we produce product at about 100% of our current production capacity during the first quarter of 2021, it was not enough and strong demand created a backlog worth approximately $3.1 million as of March 31, 2021, which was increased from about $1.8 million as of December 31, 2020. Our investment to increase our annual production capacity from approximately $16.5 million to $23 million is on track to be complete by the end of June. With that, we do expect to make up for the first quarter drop in sales and report sales growth for the full year of 2021 over 2020. Our sales team has been working very diligently to manage the product shortfall with customers. I can now see the light at the end of this 18-month tunnel to where we can start selling with inventory on the shelves sometime during the third quarter. The drop in gross margin to 39% of sales during the first quarter ‘21 is also related to this capacity expansion. To demonstrate, I will review some informal pro forma finances with you. Had we been able to reduce costs by $287,000 during the first quarter, our gross margin percentage would have been 46% instead of the 39% we reported. We have identified costs aggregating at, at least that amount that I would consider upfront startup or one-time costs. These are costs that we had to incur to benefit from the future capacity expansion, but they were not necessary to meet the first quarter production output. In addition to the top line sales results, the production capacity expansion and the gross margin results just discussed, I would like to touch on three more topics: one, the use of proceeds from April’s equity raise; two, our cash flows; and three, the road to regulatory approval of Re-Tain. First, as you may know, we raised $4,250,000 in new equity at $8.25 per share last month. That was a straight common stock deal, no warrants, no converts, very low issuance costs. This funding together with some other available cash allows us to aggressively take on four new important growth investments aggregating about $5.4 million. We are investing to scale up and upgrade our vaccine production capacity, expand and improve our classroom collection capabilities and logistics further increase our annual production capacity for First Defense from the new level of $23 million to about $30 million and for build inventory levels as we come out of backlog and prepare for peak selling season during the first quarter of 2022. Full details about these investments and other capital expenditure projects that we are working on can be found in our quarterly report, in the MD&A section under liquidity and capital resources, around Pages 25 to 26. I appreciate the confidence that these new investors have demonstrated in our business and I believe we are putting this money to very productive use to grow our business for the benefit of all stockholders. So secondly, our cash flows. Driven primarily by large product development expenses to bring Re-Tain to market, we continue to report a net loss. However, I think we should focus on our cash flows more than our GAAP net loss at this stage in our development. Page 4 of last night’s press release provides a look at the impact of certain non-cash expenses on our financial results. You can see that we continue to report positive EBITDA, which I believe is the most relevant to tracking our bottom line performance at this stage. But the most important measure is the statement of cash flows on Page 4 of our quarterly report. Third and lastly, the road to regulatory approval of Re-Tain. It has been a long and then it has been an expensive road, but we are nearing completion of the work required to achieve FDA approval of this novel sub-clinical mastitis treatment for lactating dairy cows without a milk discard or meat withhold. During the first quarter, we submitted the last five technical sections required for FDA approval. This kind of submission is subject to a 6-month review by the FDA. That puts us at a huge fork in the road during the third quarter of this year. If the FDA has questions for us, we could be required to respond through another submission, which would be subject to an additional 6-month review. We do not anticipate that an additional submission would be required after that. Therefore, we are making plans for a mass market launch during the second quarter of 2022, while also being prepared to flex to an initial limited launch plan around the end of this year, in the event the approval comes through in response to our first submission. Re-Tain puts a second horse in the race for us as we strive to keep growing our total product sales. So in conclusion, I encourage you to review the press release and the quarterly report on Form 10-Q that we filed last night. Also please have a look at our corporate presentation slide deck and May update was just posted to our website last night. I believe it provides a very good summary of our business strategy and objectives as well as our current financial results. You would see the Investors Section on our website and click on Corporate Presentation. With that said, I will be happy to take your questions. Let’s have the operator open up the lines. Thanks, Jamie.