Welcome everyone to the Fourth Quarter 2016 Hawaiian Electric Industries Inc. Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Cliff Chen, Treasurer and Manager of Investor Relations and Strategic Planning. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Amy and thank you all and welcome to Hawaiian Electric Industries' 2016 fourth quarter and year-end earnings call. Joining me this morning are Connie Lau, HEI President and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Boards of Hawaiian Electric Company and American Savings Bank; Jim Ajello, HEI Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Alan Oshima, Hawaiian Electric Company President and Chief Executive Officer; and Rich Wacker, American Savings Bank President and Chief Executive Officer as well as other members of Senior Management. Connie, will provide an overview, followed by Jim, who will update you on Hawaii's economy, our results for the fourth quarter and year end 2016 and our 2017 earnings guidance. Then we will conclude with questions-and-answers. In today's presentation, Management will be using non-GAAP financial measures to describe the Company's operating performance. Our press release and webcast presentation materials which are posted on HEI's Investor Relations website, contain additional disclosures regarding these non-GAAP measures, including reconciliations of these measures to the equivalent GAAP measures. Forward-looking statements will also be made on today's call. Actual results could differ materially from what is described in those statements. Please refer to the forward-looking statements disclosure accompanying the webcast slides which provides additional information on important factors that could cause results to differ. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, including EPS guidance, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. I’ll now turn the call over to our CEO, Connie Lau.

Thank you, Cliff and Aloha to everyone and also Happy Valentine's Day. In 2016 our operating companies, Hawaiian Electric and American Savings Bank delivered earnings within our increased 2016 EPS guidance issued in our third quarter call. At the utility, Hawaiian Electrics spent approximately $318 million in 2016 on local infrastructure projects to modernize and improve Hawaii's electric grid and to reliably integrate more renewable energy. We achieved an energy portfolio powered by about 25% renewable resources advancing towards our 100% goal for 2045. We filed an updated power supply improvement plan in December and we are focused on creating at a reasonable cost and working with third party energy developers and providers the renewable energy platform of future for the benefit of all of Hawaii. At the bank we saw excellent deposit growth, higher net interest income and strong efficiency improvement. Although provision for loan losses increased from 2015 levels, American Savings Bank grew bottom-line earnings and maintained healthy capital level. Following the termination of the proposed merger with NextEra Energy and cancellation of the related spinoff of American Savings Bank, HEI and its operating subsidiaries are moving forward as an independent consolidated enterprise providing essential electricity and banking services for Hawaii and investing in the growth of Hawaii's economy. Hawaiian Electric continues to be a national leader in clean energy. In 2016 approximately 25% of our combined customer's energy needs on all the islands we serve were powered by renewable resources with higher percentages for Maui County and Hawaii Island of 36% and 53% respectively. To provide you with greater perspective at certain times of the year in 2016 renewable sources from our grid have powered up to approximately 45% of the electricity needs on Oahu's and up to approximately 60% on Maui and Hawaii Island. We are…

Thanks Connie. Hawaii's tourism industry set new records in 2016 in both visitor spending and arrivals. Visitor expenditures increased 4.2% to $15.6 billion and arrivals increased 3% compared to the same period last year. State-wide unemployment fell to 2.9% in December of 2016, lowest in nearly a decade and lower than the state's December 2015 rate of 3.3% and the national rate of 4.7%. Hawaii's real estate activity remain strong 2016 median sales prices for single family residential homes and condominiums on Oahu increased 5% and 8.3% respectively over 2015. The median sales price for single family homes on Oahu in December was $730,000 up 4.3% from last year. According to the University of Hawaii's December 16 forecast, the Hawaii economy continues to perform well with visitor tour arrivals up lower unemployment and healthy construction sector, however growth maybe lower going forward with the plateauing of construction in 2018. Real estate GDP is expected to grow 2.1% in 2017. The outlook for the economy recently published on February 8 by the Department of Business Economic Development and Tourism indicated that well expecting Hawaii's economy to continue to have positive growth in 2017 and 2018, it also expects that state GDP will grow at a lower rate than projected in its previous forecast at 1.8% in 2017 largely due to lower forecast on visitor expenditures. Turning to our 2016 results on Slide 6, reading across from left to right, consolidated 2016 GAAP net income of $248.3 million included the one-time impact of $58.2 million additional net income due to the terminated merger fee net of costs including the related terminated LNG contract and the associated cancellation of the spinoff of American Savings Bank. Adjusted for merger and spin expenses and fees core net income was $190.1 million in 2016. Core net…

Thanks Jim. In summary, our utilities will continue to provide central electricity services for Hawaii while advancing towards our 100% renewable goal. We remain focused on expanding customer options and on creating at a reasonable cost the renewable energy platform of the future for the benefit of all of Hawaii while maintaining the service and reliability, our customers expect. Our bank will focus on deepening customer relationships to drive deposit and loan growth as well as continually working towards improving operating efficiency and earnings growth. The bank will break ground in 2017 on a new campus headquarters which will allow consolidation of operations for greater efficiency and productivity to help meet the metrics provided in our guidance. On Monday, our board maintained our quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share continuing our uninterrupted dividend payment since 1901. The dividend yield continues to be attractive at 3.7% as of yesterday's market close. HEI and its unique combination of companies, Hawaiian Electric and American Savings Bank will continue to move forward strongly as an independent company providing long-term value for our customers, community, employees and shareholders. And now before we go to Q&A, I'm sure many of you saw our press release and 8-K this morning regarding our CFO transition. Our most favorite CFO, Jim Ajello is going to be retiring at the end of the first quarter and Greg Hazelton will take over for Jim as part of a longstanding succession planning process, Jim has served our company well over the last eight years and in fact many of us cannot believe that it's been eight years but he has decided to dedicate himself to family, various company boards and hopefully a less hectic pace. But of course we cannot let Jim get away completely and so I'm delighted to announce that he is joining the Board of Directors and Risk Committee of American Savings Bank. Jim's service to the company has been invaluable to me, the Board and all of our stakeholders. Our new CFO, Greg Hazelton I think many of you are already familiar with Greg, he brings strong industry and corporate finance expertise, as well as public company experience and has worked well with Jim over the last few years leading to this point. We are truly fortunate to have the seamless transition. And with that, we look forward to hearing your questions. I should add the management team said they are going to make Jim answer all the questions since this will be his last webcast.

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Andy Levi at Avon Capital Advisors.

Hi, I got the first question.

Hi Andy.

How you doing? Jim, congratulations. I'll miss you.

Thank you, Andy. Thank you very much.

I really mean that, you've been very good to us here at Millennium. We appreciate that.

Thank you, Andy.

Just one question. On the guidance for 2017, just can you describe the $0.13 and how we should think about that longer term?

Yes, so that is something that we found us to refresh on the topic something we filed at the end of November. The utility had been working under resettlement agreement that lasted three years going back to 2013. They applied to continue the current accrual of the RAM from January 1 that request was denied so, we’re sort of back to that prior mechanism prior to 13 settlement agreement. And so I would include that in the numbers going forward minus13 our sense that is.

Okay.

And so Andy that will affect 2017 but then the comparison from 2018, 2019 will be off that amount.

Okay, okay. I wasn't aware of that. Okay. So, that $0.13 is gone. It's almost like a new base that we grow off of, is that kind of the way to think of it? It's not like a one-timer, right? Is it? Meaning that you get that $0.13 back in 2018?

No, it's just that, it is the timing difference that will affect 2017 is that removes the accrual of the revenues from January to June but then when you look at a 2018 comparison it'll be exactly the same because the accrual will start in June of 2018.

Okay. So, it's not like you catch up in 2018?

Correct, right. And it does not affect the cash collection from customers because that always was starting at June so it was only the GAAP accrual of the revenues.

Okay. Because I guess I had thought maybe when you had done the 8-K back when this first happened that this was kind of - I don't want to say one-time in nature, but that - part of the $0.13 was kind of a catch-up, and then that the base was going to be higher. But what you're saying is, just to be clear, because it's important, this $117 million to $127 million is basically operating earnings, and that's what we're going to grow off of, without any kind of catch-up on the $0.13 in 2018.

Yes and I guess another way to say it is that within 2017 we will lose the accrual of the first five months of revenue.

Right.

But then as you roll into 2018 because the revenue accrual will be June to May you’re going to actually have a full 12 months of revenue in 2018. No, that was what I was saying is really kind of a timing issue.

Okay. We'll speak offline. I'm not sure if I 100% understand. Thank you.

The next question is from Greg Gordon, Evercore ISI.

Jim, congratulations. Greg, congratulations. And, Connie, the next time you're looking for another senior executive, give me a call.

Okay, all right.

It's cold right now in New York. I'm really thinking about a change of scenery.

Good to hear.

I'll also call you back offline on that. Because my understanding I thought was that you're losing these earnings, but then through the accruals being reset, and also through normal rate-making activity, a lot of the things that you're not collecting would get, as you go through these series of rate cases over the next few years, get hopefully baked into normal revenue requirement.

Yes, that is correct.

Yes, so it’s a very good addition to our answer and clarification because in the course of the - of the new cases that will be filed, we’ll have a chance to address that.

Yes, good point it really only affects the accrual of revenues under the RAM in between the rate cases right.

Got you. I think we have it right in our model. I'll check with you offline. The second thing was the current capital plan as you promulgated in the release, how much of that is still subject to - of the major projects, is still pending approval, and what's the timeline for us understanding of whether that will be approved?

Okay. Looking at Slide 19 so what you see there is a couple of things. Number one I mentioned that up to $275 million that's why you see that across the middle of the page in every case are subject to the recovery under the RAM Cap plus you have major projects that you refer to Schofield has been approved, ERP has been approved, Hamakua Energy projects is pending approval. And so is the utility scale solar project that we proposed to build at Joint Base Pearl Harbor.

Okay. And we know -- Is there a statutory time frame or a pending case schedule in either or both of the Hamakua or Joint Base Pearl Harbor PV proceedings, in which we can sort of know when we're going to have an answer?

There is a docket presently scheduled and has been underway for Hamakua and the procedure of docket is to seek a decision in the first quarter of this year has been scheduled. And for Joint Base Pearl Harbor I'll turn back to Alan.

There is no statutory requirement for a decision at any time. So it will be in process and we're hoping for an early decision, but we cannot promise anything.

Okay. And then final question. You knew you were going to get a tax question, so I might as well ask it first. Basic math on the bank profitability, if the federal income tax rate were to be lowered, that would fall to the bottom line. That's a fair and simple answer, correct?

That is a simple answer correct.

Okay. And then the other thing was even if we don’t get tax reform, there is a potential for the slimming down some of the Dodd-Frank legislation. Can you refresh our memory on what the impact was at certain aspect if I look at Durbin Amendment, so if that were changed or fully removed, what impact that might have on your profitability because I recall that it was created significant cost for your bank?

You're correct in all respect. So going back into for the last five years since this amendment to Dodd-Frank those promulgated the Durbin amendment. The bank lost 10% of its net income and an ROA contribution of 10 basis points. So call it $60 million down to $6 million call it a 100 basis points down to about 90 ROA. So and we call that was because the consolidated assets of HEI exceeded $10 billion. So the exchange fees have a different if you will rate card for institutions they have less than $10 billion than those who have $10 billion or above. So, rather unfairly for us I would say the legislation which obviously didn't anticipate our particular unique structure really counted the utility assets in the test in the Durbin amendment. So that is what we've been suffering with as it were for about five years now, and so o that's where we stand. So adjustment in that could relieve that. I can't tell you what the prospects of that happening are. It's like all the other things that are swirling around Washington. They are subject to a lot of speculation right now. So we run scenarios all the time, but we certainly are not comfortable enough yet providing any of these changes in the corporate tax rate or the Durbin amendment or interest expense netting because we have interest income at the bank versus interest expense at the consolidated entity of frankly two to one. So those are the things that seem to be in play, but we're watching them closely.

One more question on tax. It wasn't something when I first started writing on tax that I thought a lot about for utilities, but it turns out probably something that needs to be thought about, too. The border tax adjustment. That's probably an added wrinkle for you guys being technically inside the borders, but actually pretty far away from the continent. You import almost everything. So, have you guys thought through, and if you haven't, forgive me for asking, what the impact to customer bills might be if you were slapped with a border tax on all the inputs into your Business?

We're aware of the border tax discussion we're starting to run scenarios on that, but we haven't pin that down yet. I think Hawaii and as you suggest any unique position is importing so much, including our own petroleum product not for generation here but for a variety of the other aspects of the economy. So I think this is an important point you make, we just can't quantify the outcomes yet.

Okay, thank you. Again congratulations.

The next question is from Paul Patterson with Glenrock Associates.

Aloha, and congratulations, Jim.

Thanks, Paul.

Let me just follow up on this $0.13, because I think it's important that we actually sort of clarify this. All things being equal, would we see the $0.13 reverse itself in 2018, on an earnings basis?

Not on a earnings basis. So I think I'll singularly unsuccessful -- I'm kidding you guys just understand, so I'm going to ask Tayne to give it a shot from a different angle.

Hi, Paul. Okay, let me take through the, so let's take a look at 2017, just 2017 alone. With the $0.13 represent is the loss of the accrual for the period January through May, okay, so think of that that's 2017. As we start towards a 2018 under the original framework of the company where the RAM revenues were recorded from June 1 to May 31. So if you look at that's what in 2018, the revenue that will be reported would be five months from 2017 plus seven months in 2018, so you'll get 12 months of RAM revenues in 2018. So that's a difference between the two years. And $0.13 represent January through May accrual where nothing is recorded. Connie started by saying it as a tiny thing, 2017 is that transition year transitioning back to the original framework under the coupling, where we record revenues on a like basis from June 1 to May of following year. And I'd just add that the commission decision did that align it with the cash collection from customers which was always from June 1 to May 31 of the following year.

Okay. Bottom line is, we're not going to get a $0.13 pop, so to speak. We're not going to have a reversal in 2018.

That's correct.

Okay. Then with respect to the CapEx, I'm sorry if I'm just sort of missing this, but clearly it looks like your rate base forecast on slide 19 is increasing from what you guys had in the third quarter, and it's not clear to me what's driving it. I mean, it looks -- I see some changes in Schofield but ERP, Hamakua, the Pearl Harbor PV; all that seems to be sort of the same. I did notice that smart grid is sort of -- is gone. Can you just sort of -- is it the solar additions that you guys are talking about or -- I mean, what is it that's driving the rate base increase in 2017 and 2018, versus the third quarter?

So, actually if you look at as Jim reported the rate base growth in 2016 was 3% and in 2017 the 3% to 5% where the growth is coming from it is since the Hamakua Energy Partners that plant is in the rate based in 2017. So that’s the biggest items there. The rest come from gesture ordinary 275 rate based growth year over year. The other part to that Jim talked about where we touched about Schofield and ERP will be in current CapEx in 2017 that those projects will be completed in 2018 which is why down the rate based is latest to be the range -- latest to be a little higher.

Okay. But the rate base in 2016, 2017, 2018, is notably higher than it was, that you guys were projecting in 20 in the third quarter. You follow what I'm saying? And it just wasn't clear to me. I guess we could take this offline. I'm just sort of wondering what is it that actually has changed to make the absolute number higher in rate base than what you guys were forecasting for those three years in the third quarter?

Yes so in the third quarter, there were a lot of smaller base line projects that actually did complete this year, when we take a look at our entire year generally speaking we got a lot of stormy weather in the last couple of months in the year, we were fortunate enough not to have any of those major storms and so we were able to complete a lot of little projects in 2016 that might have slipped to 2017, so forecasting there we had some discounting of completion of those projects in our third quarter guidance.

Okay. And then just finally, the positive tax adjustment in the fourth quarter of the holding company of $2 million, what was that about?

The domestic production activities deduction mostly will call the manufacturers credit, so that is from the generation base at the utility because the utility is still NOL situation that credit was able to migrate up to the holding company where we consolidate for taxes.

And Paul just so you don’t get confused remember we did record a positive adjustment in the third quarter and these adjustments are based on quite involved calculations on what we expect as far as generation of kilowatt hours by the utility itself and so frankly we adjusted that calculation in the fourth quarter, so you can really have to net the third and fourth quarter together.

Okay. Great. Thanks so much. Congratulations again, Jim.

The next question is from Charles Fishman with Morningstar.

Hi. Jim, I'm going to pass on getting in line for your job behind Greg, because I got to tell you, I don't envy somebody that's got to explain bank financials to a bunch of utility analyst prima donnas. I always appreciate the patience you showed me. Wish you the best of luck. Connie, if we go back to slide 4, I had just two questions. Electrification of transportation, I believe that's the first time I've heard you mention that. Unless I've missed it. Is that something that's driven by Hawaii Electric Industries, or is that coming from the Commission, or is it government, or who's driving that?

So hopefully Charles it isn’t the first time that you heard me talk about it because we have actually been focusing on electrification of transportation for quite a while now and probably are one of the utilities across the nation that have been leading in this area, one of the key reasons for it is if you just look at the economics of the state and the fossil fuel that is brought in to be consumed in state, we only consume a third of that, two-thirds of it is transportation and so when our state back in 2008 entered into the Hawaii clean energy initiative with us it was to work on the first one-third that was our usage of the fossil fuel one third brought into the state. But if our state truly wants to go green then we have to figure out ways to address the transportation sector and so that is why we have been promoting things like our new electric rail that is coming into Hawaii and then also very aggressively promoting electrification of transportation and in the form of electric vehicle that have brought in. So we are always advocating and frankly we have to advocate pretty hard to compete with California where a lot of the zero emission electric vehicles go but as I said in the prepared remarks on a per capita basis, we actually are the second in the nation after California and it's major effort for us we actually within the last year had a number of co-promotions with auto manufactures or various specialists on EV purchases, releases to our employees and actually we have one on going right now to all of our customers. They have to do is bring their bill to the auto dealers, the one that is doing the offer currently and they get a $10,000 rebate so we are aggressively pushing that, we actually had become part of a consortium here in the state called drive electric Hawaii that include not only us and our cooperative is the island of Hawaii but also our State Department of Transportation, business economic development and tourism, consumer advocate and a couple of the nonprofits that are very interested in climate change and helping to clean Hawaii’s environment. And I'm going to also let Alan content to you because he's really been the face for a lot of our efforts here locally.

Yes, thank you. I also want to point out that it is totally in line with the commission directive to utilities to be innovator and workforce solutions to benefit our customers so you look first location on a scale the couple read environment is really met to be able to control the bills of for customers by finding other clean uses of clean energy so its fuel substitution plan that benefits all of our customers bills overall brings value. The other part is it's not just electric vehicles but we’ve working very closely with our series to see if we can electrified public transportation we were very actively seeking government grants to get some electric buses into Hawaii and we will continue to do that so, and finally we are working very closely with our energy accelerator with some of the programs and projects that there are encouraging and were working closely with them to find different ways to satisfy the needs of electrification and the transportation sector including novel ways to charge.

And we’re really excited about the possibilities that down the batteries in the EVs as a storage component to the total energy picture going forward. Alan mentioned the electric buses then there is we've also been in discussions to utilize those batteries are and to work with are sitting in county to utilize those on the this grant ones they are no longer used in the transportation sector and of course you know there's all the discussions about the batteries in EVs being used as storage devices this that can shift load based on type of things like times of use rates and or providing for workplace charging which would occur during the daytime hours here in Hawaii when we have a lot of solar energy. So it’s a whole range of things that, yes Alan wants to add and we could go on forever on the list.

I think everyone because it is public just part of the transformation of our company we are standing off separate group for electrification and so when the process are standing their group for us it will cause many, many instructors finance, government, industry, partners et cetera as well as marketing so that’s part of our transformation plant and were actively pursuing it.

Yes, I didn't mean to imply you hadn't been doing things in this area before. Connie, maybe what I should have said was, is there anything that's happened recently that got it to the level that you've included it as a bullet point on your opening comments, and that I hadn't recalled before. Obviously, maybe it's just a lot of things are happening that it's just all of them together, finally reached a level that's worth talking about right at the beginning. Is that a fair assessment?

Yes and also major focus of the company coming out of our merger, we can go back to working on a lot of the really exciting things that we are working on as a community, because you can tell from our discussions that it can't just be about us. It has to really be a community wide effort to look at electrifying Hawaii and basically cleaning up Hawaii as a electric system goes to a 100% renewable.

I think in general you got to be doing a lot more about electrification because the auto manufacturers, bus manufacturers have already started on all their planning of advance this faster than I think many people realize and that's where we think we have to be looking at future, and that's why the emphasis has moved to this as well.

Okay. Well, thank you for such a thorough answer.

One of our favourite things to talk about actually.

The next question is from Tim Winter of Gabelli.

Good morning. And congrats, Jim. You're going to be missed here at Gabelli, as well.

Thanks, Tim.

I have a big-picture question. Given the strong performance of the banks, ongoing capital needs at the utility, and you guys were close to spinning the Bank with the NextEra merger, what are some of the factors that are keeping you from monetizing the Bank and recycling capital back into the utility?

Tim, I think you know that we continually run that analysis and our board is actually charged us with doing so. But in that analysis there is many, many factors that go into that discussion, including the fact that Hawaii as a state that has a stakeholder statute and so we have to make sure that we consider all factors not just the financial factors but community based factors in those kinds of analysis. Having said that, we'll continue to look at it going forward, you probably know that some of the factors obviously have shifted recently with the running the bank, that would do things like increase the tax bill for the bank on a spin. With interest rates rising, financing costs for an acquirer are going to be changing. So there is multitude of those kind of factors that we continue to look at and our current view is that we've not seen a compelling case for our shareholders to move ahead with any different structure in the company.

Okay. Thank you, Tayne.

The next question is from Michael Goldenberg at Luminus Management.

Good afternoon. I actually have no questions. I just wanted to wish Jim good luck, and thank him for years of great service, and I appreciate how Jim was always a gentleman in all conversations. So, thank you very much, and good luck in your future endeavors.

Thank you, Michael. It's been an honor and privilege. Thank you.

Thanks, Michael.

The next question is from Abdullah Murdy of BlueCrest Capital.

Good afternoon. And, Jim, same from me. Best wishes, and thank you very much for everything over the last eight years.

Great time. Thank you.

Couple of little housekeeping things. I was going through the balance sheet, and I want to make sure I saw it properly. When I did a simple calculation, it looked like given the payment from NextEra and all these other things, the utility capitalization looks like it's about 58% equity right now, if I was looking at the right area, I think it's about $1.8 billion of equity, and you have capitalization at 31 or something like that. How is that going to work itself down over time, based on your plan, and will there be a period in time where the equity that's going to be recognized in rates will be lower than what we see on the financials, just because it's maybe somewhat elevated right now?

If you actually go back and look at the utility balance sheet, they have always been at around the 58% level and if you look in the appendix slide you'll see that that matches up with the approved capital structure for the utility that has existed for many years in our rate case.

Yes. So you'll see about 56% common that a 1% preferred, you get close to 58, but that's the utility. We may have confused you when we talked about the higher equity capitalization of the holding company owing to the receipt of a termination fee and the release of the special dividend fund in July of last year on the breakage of the transactions. That in turn allowed us to a pay down all short-term debt. We eliminated about $80 million of commercial paper hence the equity capitalization level on a consolidated basis, went up by 6 or 7 points. That's why our HEI level were about 56% now, but the utility's balance sheet as Tayne said has been static for quite so many years.

Yes and just to add to that if you remember how we allocate capital within our company, because we have two heavily regulated enterprises. We really make sure that the capital structures for each of the operating companies match what is required in the regulation. So that's why for example on the bank side to talk about that for a moment we really target a tier 1 leverage ratio that we talk with the OCC about all the time. And there is quite a bit of analysis that goes on banking side to determine what the appropriate capitalization is to retain within the bank and that's really the same thing that goes on the utility side.

Okay. And does that mean then over the next few years, as you said, you're not going to need to issue any equity at all, and it seems like I was looking through the sources, and you said there will be -- that the deficiency between cash flows and capital expenditures will be debt financed. How are those ratios going to move around, or will they somehow manage to stay kind of in the same band?

So, good observation, we don't need equity even our dividend reinvestment plan equity which we ordinarily receive is perhaps a 1% dilution. So no equity in 2017 and 2018 and we may even be able to go little longer. It just really depends on the pace at level of CapEx approvals of the utility that would execute. And so what will happen with time is like a seesaw that equity capitalization will reduce a little bit as debt comes in the near term to finance the activities. We typically run at the holding company level, about 50% equity. Right now where over equitized had about 56% due to what I said earlier about the release of the special dividend fund that we see at the merger termination fee.

Okay. Does that mean that since you're not going to be issuing even stock for dividend reinvestment for the people who participate, that you'll be fulfilling those needs through open market purchases, and can you tell us like over the course of this last year, what dividend reinvestment's been running at?

Sure, yet that's precisely right. There is still a very significant retail demand for the stock. The retail holders in general constitute about 50% to 55% of the holdings, so we are very retail help. That program tends to be very successful popular as they were. Really almost regardless of the price of the shares that's been a steady demand that we do our shareholder services area that Cliff Chen runs has satisfied that demand through open market purchases for those same investors. And so we'll continue to do that as we go and that tends to be supportive as well so stock prices you can imagine.

So what was the gross dollars in 2016, the aggregate dollars that were covered by that plan?

$30 million, we closed it in early December actually $30 million.

That covers three quarters, and then we switch to open market purchases in the fourth quarters.

Yes we've been running $35 million to $40 million on a sort of a regular basis but as Connie said last year $30 million three quarters.

That's what I was wondering. Thank you. One of the other tax issues that's come up is deductibility of interest of holding company debt. So, can you remind me how much absolute holding company debt you have that would potentially fall under a qualification, what the associated interest cost is right now with that?

Yes so with the reduction in the short term debt, we have about $300 million of LTD outstanding and the cost, the consolidated cost of that LTD is running just south of 3% pre-tax.

Not a big deal. One last thing. If I missed this in your opening remarks, I apologize. But do you have any update in terms of the rooftop solar issue, in terms of either on a regulatory basis or netbacks, or however things are moving, or whether it's been resolved in some fashion, or whether it's going to be coming up in the docket. If you could just update me on that, and that's pretty much it for me. Thank you.

Well there has been some reform here, we're still going through a docket to see the next phase of roof top private solar in our state but things are moving along and the company is working with stakeholders to see what is possible, we have a lot of private solar in our PSIP as you will see really coming up with the regulatory programs that will benefit our customers.

So I will add to that, at the bottom of page three we got about 15% of customers that had solar PV rough to just south of 600 megawatts there, very substantial for grid of our size and then you may or may not remember that it was a reform as Alan calls it, in October of 2015 with the Net Energy Metering Program has constituted was closed and limits were set and a mechanism that changed the pricing for the purchase of those kilowatt hours has changed and reduced as well and it was a cap put on the program and so Alan is really referring to the go forward what happens to that program next as the program has been subscribed and changed already.

Forgive me not sure you're asking but...

Yes, it was. I was just wondering what was going to happen. I appreciate the refresher. Just wondering kind of going forward here, what are the potential changes from where we are right now that you might see, as well.

Well in the future there is aspects for more private solar but maybe more control ability with advanced inverters once this smart grid is actually out there, the two way communications for distributed generation, how it all fits in with demand response programs as well, so it is a wholly integrated plan to get to a 100% renewable not focused specifically on any specific resource.

I would like to add that the improvement plan that we filed does have significant room for increased private solar going forward into the future and we do expect that that will continue to be major component of renewable generation in Hawaii.

Okay. And again, Jim, thank you, and best wishes.

Thanks.

Before you get off, let me just go back and talk a little bit about your question on holding company debt and interest deductibility because as you know taxes are done on a consolidated basis, so in our case you also have to consider the fact that we do have the bank which has significant interest income and of course that those tax discussions have been talking about netting interest income and interest expense, so I just want to make sure you don’t lose sight of that piece of it as well.

Okay. Thank you very much.

The next question is from Jackie Boland at KBW.

Hi everyone. I'm going to give Rich a little bit of air time here.

Absolutely.

Absolutely. Looking first at the loan portfolio, the smick pay downs that you had, I know that there was a large chunk of them in 3Q. Were there any more that came in 4Q, as well?

Yes we continued throughout the year to opportunistically get out of some of the exposures. So we continued probably fourth Q was about $10 million of additional so for the year in total just north of 90.

Okay.

Yes we got out of all of them in 2016 and we exit we're profitable and we got out of our basis.

Okay. Is that something that could continue into 2017?

Selectively we don’t think the kind of decline will be anything like what you saw, we feel pretty good about where we are with what is left, there are always earnings to the portfolio as we look at the relative risk and opportunity in the exposures and the timing of that against new originations. So you may see some volatility in the quarter but not a big shift.

Okay. And then when I think about the loan growth that you've forecast for the year, are there any shifts within the portfolio composition that you see happening, or more just kind of the general trend of focus on commercial and letting some of the residential run down a little bit?

Right I think it will be fairly the composition won't shift as much as it did, you will see probably commercial real estate come down slightly or not grow as a lot of the big projects complete and pay off and convert either to mortgages as to residential units or other permanent financing, so we don’t expect we had really strong commercial real estate growth and we don’t expect to see that again, so you will see kind of a rebalancing there.

Okay. That's helpful. Thank you. And then turning to the e-banking platform that you have put in place, are there any more expenses that will come in 1Q from that?

No, we are through the conversion, we are kind of into ongoing production mode, we are realizing the ongoing savings on a run rate basis against where we were before. So we have the ongoing normal course upgrades that we will do as the platform evolves but we're through that implantation.

Okay. And were there any one-time charges, either related to that or just in general, maybe some year-end true-ups that are in the expenses in the fourth quarter?

We always have year-end true ups on performance compensation that comes in based on how the year is for all of our production teams and that, so there is a little bit of that in there but otherwise the first quarter didn’t have any meaningful one-time items.

Okay. That's a fairly good run rate going forward?

Yes.

Okay. That's helpful. And when I look to the NIM guidance that you have, what kind of a rate outlook do you forecast? And does it include any additional increases to Fed funds?

We kind of base lining one more, one bump this year on the timing that's it otherwise we tend to not do our own, we use external forecasters and guys like you to tell us what is going to happen because we are smart enough about it, we got your job. So we are looking at one more bump during the year on the Fed thing.

Okay. Well, thankfully mine comes from the top down from our director of research. I don't have to forecast that either. And then the borrowing reduction that took place in the quarter, was the full-quarter impact felt for that, or was it a late quarter pay down?

It was November pay down, so we will see a little, that ripple through a little bit more in the run rate.

Okay. And then just lastly, if you could provide your thoughts on mortgage banking, given the movement that we've seen in rates and what your expectations are for the coming year.

Yes, we were expecting a slight decline in production that will affect the split, we haven’t yet turn our heads around where it's going to affect more of the jumbo or the saleable, so the way we see it rolling through - we tend to sell about 40% of our production as we work to remix the book, so we are kind of holding that flat now as we go into the year but on lower production, so we will see a decline in the mortgage banking income.

Okay. Thank you. That's very helpful. Jim, I pile on with everyone else in wishing you the best of luck in all the future holds for you.

Thanks Jackie, I'm not going to be far from American, that's for sure.

No, I saw that.

The next question is from Ashar Khan of Verition.

Hi. How are you doing? Jim, congratulations. I just wanted to get a little bit of flavor of what kind of - what should we shoot for kind of earning a return from these rate cases going forward in 2018? What could be the earnings impact or what kind of an ROE improvement do you think we should budget for, as we look into 2018 from the rate case actions during this year, 2017.

I'll start Ashar, and thank you very much for your wishes. I'll start referring to Slide 25 in the deck which explains where we are vis-à-vis be allowed and what it as it were fixable as the possible matter from the rate cases and we’re very early on in the rate cases so it’s really hard to describe of prejudge any of those matters that might actually occur but we try to anticipate your question by showing you what is possible here and I think, I could probably leave it at that by showing you, 8 or so elements of where we stand from the 9.8 as you know we printed the 8.1. So there's quite a gap 170 basis points and this decomposition provides you a sense of what is possible and what is not possible based on the current structure. The utility team is fine with that explanation.

So Jim, just going back to the slide, could you just go through these things which you have, what comes possible and what is not in the possible camp?

Yes, I mean it’s - looking at items 1, 2 and 3 the possible as it were, the non-recovery items and - the impossible items are pictured on the left hand side, non-recovery of incentive comp short-term interest rate on the outstanding RBA balance that was already fixed in the prior proceeding and this matter that we've actually been spending quite a lot of time on so far is the RAM revenue accrual delay I’ll call it to June 1. So those are the items on the order of 50 basis points here identified in those three label to such 1, 2, 3 that are currently hardwired as it were I call it that. Proceeding to the right-hand side of the plant add-ons over the RAM cap are applied for and can be fixed the O&M and excess to the test your RAM, the pension assets there stood up to test your levels are very important item for us because we did make it for six years now, quite a long time and so forth. So that gives you a flavor here and I hope the slide is helpful in that regard.

Yes, so the right-hand side are really the things that the mandatory three-year rate case basically true-up is meant to address though these are the things that happened during in between the rate case when we only have the RAM type adjustment or mechanism e-cap going until these things can be addressed in rate cases.

Connie, unless I have missed on a slide, can we attribute, because what is the - based on the midpoint of the utility guidance, what is the ROE that is - you have assumed will be in 2017?

Yes, that’s contained to your…

Can I speak Jim.

Sure.

On the ROE guidance we didn’t get any guidance because there is a lot of uncertainty with our impending rate cases, we're going through that process now it’s very difficult to determine what that ROE would be.

Yes, but in 2017, if I have it correct, your rate base is going up by 3% to 5%, right? That's what you said. And then Utility earnings, if I'm right, are going down by $0.10 to $0.13. So, one would assume, unless my math is wrong, what I would kind of like your help, is that the ROE should be somewhere in the low-7% areas, or am I wrong?

Well, let me just correct you one thing Ashar that, remember on that down $0.10 - $0.13 of that is the difference in that RAM accrual to change in the timing on the RAM accrual.

But doesn't that impact your ROE calculations, or no, that doesn't impact your ROE calculations?

It does impact our ROE calculations.

It does right?

Right,

It does but the point is that given that…

Doesn't that imply that the ROE has to be lower than the 8.1% that is shown in this Slide 25 for 2017? It has to be in a 7% level, unless I'm doing my math wrong or conceptually wrong.

Ashar you're quite right I would say that however given the puts and takes that could happen in the rate case, we didn’t want to go further and speculate what could be the outcomes of the rate case that could.

I understand. I just want to understand that there is - it seems like if you take the left and the right as you kind of did, what was the permanent and what was the non-permanent, that these rate cases could be, if you get some reasonable decisions, they could be big earnings improver, because you are really huge under-earning your return in 2017. You're more like a 7% ROE earner, based on the earnings forecast that you provided. I just want to make sure I have that math correct.

I could confirm that the adjustment of the $0.13 puts us in the 7% range right but if I can…

I just wanted to have that. So, it's a 7% range.

Just a balance of the answer, I can confirm that, that would be the negative effect but what we don't know is one of the other adjustable items coming out of rate case right, that’s the imprecision right now.

Understand. I just want to have a good sense as to what ROE we are earning in this 2017 case environment. Thank you so much, and congratulations again.

So if there are no more questions, thank you for participating.

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.