Thanks Ian. Well, what a difference a couple of months makes. Much has changed since we presented our 4Q 2016 results back in early March. Surprising most industry participants and observers to the upside. In the April report, the IMF forecasts 3.5% global GDP growth for full-year 2017, up from 3.1% in 2016 and 3.8% growth of global trade in goods and services, up from 2.2% last year. They remark upon buoyant financial markets and suggests that a long awaited cyclical recovery in manufacturing and trade may be underway. However, they also caution the downside risks remain. These include geopolitical tensions and uncertainty, persistent structural problems in various economies of low productivity growth and high income inequality and growing support in a number of developed economies for inward looking and potentially protectionist policies. In container shipping, sentiment has improved materially, with the charter rates and asset values climbing in March and April. Supply demand fundamentals have been improving, but the most significant recent development in the sector is the launch on April 1 of two new liner alliances, the Ocean Alliance comprising CMA CGM, COSCO SHIPPING, Evergreen and OOCL, and the Alliance which is had by the Hapag-Lloyd and UASC, three Japanese liner companies and Yang Ming. Turning now to Slide 8. Industry fundamentals are improving, particularly for midsize and smaller tonnage. Containerized trade growth for full-year 2017 is forecast 4.3%, up from around 3.4% in 2016 and current expectations are that demand growth should exceed that of supply during 2017 and 2018 continuing a trend established in 2016. Excess supplier remains an important consideration, but idle capacity has trended down significantly. The non-mainlane and intra-regional trades especially into Asia are expected to perform well in 2017 with the north south trades showing signs of recovery after a disappointing couple of years. As these trade groups are of particular relevance as one, collectively they represent over 70% of global containerized trade volumes, and two, they tend to be served mainly by mid-sized and smaller tonnage, which continues to be the focus of global shipping. Slide 9 focuses on forces shaping supply side dynamics, namely the forward order book, idle capacity and scrapping activity. All of which should continue to have a positive in other words downward impact on the supply of mid-sized and smaller tonnage. As you can see from the charts the vessels below 10,000 TEU continue to be under represented in the order book. Order book to fleet ratios for mid-sized and smaller tonnage range from 1% to 6.8%. Contrast that with 14.8% for the fleet as a whole and 45.8% for larger vessels. Ordering activity remained limited. Meantime, idle fleet capacity has trended down significantly. By mid-April, it stood at 3.4% roughly half that at year end. Almost 210,000 TEU was scrapped in 1Q, 2017, up by roughly 50% on 1Q, 2016. And as you’ll remember, 2016 was a record year. However, in March and April, as idle capacity reduced, market tension and spot market charter rates improved and scrapping activity slowed somewhat. Broker estimates suggest that roughly 37,000 TEU were committed for scrap during the 30 days to April 25 against a monthly average of about 70,000 TEU during the first quarter. This brings us to slide 10, where you can see a sharp uptick in the index, the spot market charter rates. As an illustration, rates for old styled Panamax tonnage, so vessels of broadly 4,000 to 5,000 TEU increased by 135% to around $10,000 per day during the quarter. Logically, values of existing vessels also increased, correlating with the trailing charter rates. Clearly, this is a very welcome development for the industry. The upward pressure is likely a function of improving sentiment, seasonality and preparation for including competing carriers’ reaction to the launch of the new liner alliances on April 1. One industry analyst calculates that liner capacity deployed on east west trades in early April was up on March by over 5%, with the number of vessels deployed up by nearly 4%. As the new service networks bed in, time will tell if the current upturn is sustained. Regardless, the speed and trajectory of charter rate increases points to increasing supply-demand tension in the sector. Slide 11, you've seen before. Vessel deployment patterns would have evolved since year end, particularly since April 1 and we will update the analysis once the new alliance network is stabilized. Nevertheless, the thrust of the message is unchanged. Mid-size and smaller ships remain key to most trades, particularly to the large groupings of non-mainland and intraregional trades, such as intra-Asia. To conclude this section, I'd like to underline the following points. One, the macroeconomic backdrop, trade dynamics and overall sentiment appear to be improving, although downside risks remain. Two, container shipping fundamentals continue to improve, particularly for mid-sized and smaller ships, with demand growth outstripping supply growth in 2016 and forecast to do so again in 2017 and 2018, but there is still excess supply in the system. Three, spot market charter rates and asset values have firmed significantly in the first few months of 2017. Positive catalysts include improved sentiment, seasonality and the launch of new liner alliances and enhanced service networks. So while acknowledging the inherent volatility and cyclicality of the sector, we are more optimistic, albeit cautiously so than we've been for a while. If the recovery proves sustained, it will be good news for the re-chartering of both of our vessels coming open in late 2017 and early 2018. At the same time, we draw comfort from the downside insulation of our strong contracted charter coverage with industry leading counter parties. And in the context of evolving industry fundamentals, we remain strongly convinced that mid-size smaller tonnage is the right niche on which to continue to focus. So moving now onto the first quarter financials, starting on high thirteen. Revenue and utilization. We generated revenue of $39.6 million during the first quarter, down 3 million from revenues of $42.6 million in the comparative 2016 period. This decrease is due primarily to 68 fewer operating days, mainly as a result of three dry dockings in the quarter compared to none in the prior period and to the prior period being a leap year. Furthermore, the effect of reduced charter rates for Marie Delmas and Kumasi from August 1, 2016, as part of their negotiated charter extensions. Utilization was 96.9%. Vessel operating expenses. Vessel operating expenses were $10.4 million in the first quarter, down 8.7% from the prior year period. Importantly, the average cost per ownership day fell $535 per day or 7.7% to $6426 per day in the first quarter. Interest expense. Interest expense in the quarter was $11 million, down 2.1 million on the interest in the comparative 2016 period, primarily due to a lower principal amount outstanding on the notes from the 2015 excess cash flow and sale proceeds offer, which closed in March last year and the subsequent open market purchases, which in aggregate retired $53.9 million of principal amount of the notes. Net income. Net income for the first quarter was $7.6 million as compared to $5.3 million of net income for the three months ended March 31, 2016, driven primarily by a reduced interest expense, reduced depreciation and reduced operating costs, partially offset by lower operating revenues. Turning now to the balance sheet. Slide 14 shows the balance sheet. Key items as of March 31 include cash at 57 million, total assets of $773.4 million, of which 712.7 million is vessels. Our total debt was $426.4 million, down 2.9 million since the end of 2016. Net debt was $369.4 million and shareholders' equity was $335.7 million. Cash flows. Slide 15 shows our cash flows. I’d highlight that net cash provided by operating activities was $8.2 million in the first quarter as compared to $7.2 million in the same period last year. Also subsequent to the end of the quarter, we executed our 2016 excess cash flow offer, resulting in $19.5 million principal amount of the notes being retired. I would now like to turn the call back to Ian for closing remarks.