Good morning and welcome to the Green Plains, Inc. and Green Plains Partners’ First Quarter Conference Call. Following the company's prepared remarks, instructions will be provided for Q&A. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. I will now turn the call over to your host, Phil Boggs, Executive Vice President, Investor Relations. Mr. Boggs, please go ahead.

Alright. Thanks, and good morning everyone. Welcome to Green Plains, Inc. and Green Plains Partners, First Quarter Earnings Call. Participants on today's call are Todd Becker, President and Chief Executive Officer, Patrich Simpkins, Chief Financial Officer, and Leslie van der Meulen, EVP, Product Marketing and Innovation. There is a slide presentation available, and you can find it on the Investor Page under the Events and Presentations link on both corporate websites. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements which are predictions, projections, or other statements about future events. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risk and uncertainties. Actual results could materially differ because of factors discussed in today's press releases, and the comments made during this conference call and in the Risk Factors section of our Form 10-K, Form-10-Q, and other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statement. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Todd Becker.

Thanks, Phil, and good morning, everyone and thanks for joining our call today. Our recent announcements demonstrate that our ongoing transformation continues to gain steam as we achieve milestone after milestone, achieving 60% plus protein concentrations is an event that we have been aiming for and discussing with you for some time and we announced our success a couple weeks ago. Our commercial progress on protein and high-value ingredients is exceptional as the team has added new customers across multiple species. We now [Audio Gap] in the quarter. Overproduction from the industry resulted in high ethanol inventories, which led to an extremely challenging margin environment. On top of that, we had what we believe will be our last quarter of significant negative absorption from our modernization program. We also had 36 distinct individual operating days where we could not get adequate rail service to operate one or more of our plants and increased corporate cost due to one-time reclassification of compensation, along with additional one-time legal fees. This all impacted our quarter negatively and should not be recurring other than wage inflation which Patrich will discuss later on. We had indicated on our last call and at recent conferences that ethanol margins would be very weak during the first quarter, so it should come as no surprise. Overall, our ethanol crush margins were a negative $0.07 per gallon in the quarter. However, I am happy to report since the end of the quarter things have changed for the better and we will be enabled to take advantage of some of the appreciation in crush. Ethanol margins have improved significantly up the lows we experienced in the first quarter. Today on paper, second quarter margins exceed $0.25 per gallon in the crush margin and that’s factoring in strong renewable corn oil…

Thank you, Todd, and good morning, everyone. Green Plains’ consolidated revenues for the first quarter of $781.4 million were higher than the same period a year ago of $553.6 million, driven mainly by higher prices and run rates. Our plant utilization rate improved year-over-year, with an 83.1% run rate during the period, comparing favorably to the 71.1% run rate in the prior year first quarter. As Todd indicated earlier and consistent with our message in Q4 of 2021, we are now in a position to achieve higher utilization rates across the platform as we move through 2022, mainly due to the completion of our monetization programs. Consistent higher run rates for our platform remain key to supporting our transformation reducing fixed cost absorption and improving margins long-term. For the quarter, we reported a net loss of $61.5 million or $1.16 per diluted share, compared with a $6.5 million loss reported for the same period in 2021. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was a negative $27.8 million, compared to $15.4 million in the prior year quarter, largely due to weaker ethanol markets, as well as higher corporate cost driven partly by higher wages and one-time adjustments, coupled with comparative over performance of our Ag and energy segment in 2021. For the period, we realized a negative $0.07 per gallon consolidated crush margin. For the quarter, our SG&A costs for all segments was $30.9 million compared to $23.5 million reported in Q1 of 2021. The increase of approximately $7.4 million was not indicative of the normalized SG&A runrate for 2022, but it’s driven mainly by a number of one-time corporate expenses related to professional fees and adjustments to compensation. We have seen an increase in inflationary salary-related expenses and slight increases in headcount to support our business transformation, but expect our normalized…

Thanks, Patrick. So we have often pointed out late 2022 and 2023 as an inflection point for our company and we are on track to achieve our transformation. As we’ve done on prior calls, I would like to walk you through an update of each of our strategic pillars, protein, oil, sugar and carbon. But first, let’s spend a little bit of time on ethanol since we still do make some and we know it’s important for you to understand the economics of the current market. To reiterate, margins have rallied off to Q1 lows and we are benefiting from that. We started the quarter open to the crush, but as we see these recent highs, we began to lock in margins during that multi-week window. With April over, we are focused on locking downs in May and June as we saw the opportunity to return to profitability. It also helps our platform is once again running at full rate. Based on the current market, our full company EBITDA for the quarter is tracking over $50 million and corporate costs have returned more towards normal, as well. We still have some open exposure of approximately 50% of what’s left to produce for the quarter. So the numbers could move around a bit, but we do know summer driving season and geographic locations could still be beneficial. Looking forward to Q3 and Q4 margins, they also have recovered, but we remained fully open other than the fact that we own our natural gas cheaper than today’s prices. Our protein trial at Wood River was simply groundbreaking and exceeded all of our expectations. We ran this trial for a full month and quickly learned how to dial in the plan to achieve higher protein concentrations. Within five days, we were producing near…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Jordan Levy of Truist Securities. Your line is open.

Morning, all.

Morning.

You had a lot of exciting recent news, but successful trials for safety pro and the yields you were able to achieve there and you talk to new protein customers, Fluid Quip Technology and roll out that sort of things. And all of this points to some really exciting possibilities as we move to 2024, 2025, even by my numbers that’s really above the numbers you’ve already put out there. But broadly, clearly, there is a ton of caution, even fear in this market. So my question is, how can you use what you’ve already accomplished being the completion of Project 24 now, High Pro at Wood River, Shenandoah as tangible as to show the markets that these base numbers you’ve talk to – for 2024 plus are achievable or even have some upside potential to them?

Yeah, I think the key here is going to be obviously, running at full rate, because when you run the protein systems, you want to run your full grind and even continue to expand those grinds which I think we have possibilities, as well. So, completing, not just Project 24 but some of the modernization updates post project 24 like new driers in Madison, Mount Vernon and obviously getting York back up and running is going to be helpful as well. So that you start with a strong base and on top of that, what we are learning at Wood River and Shenandoah is again giving us great confidence. Number one, even at the 50 Pro sales that we have on, we’ve just gotten approved by another major pet food brand to supply them products. We went through a year of audits with them. This isn’t just a – let me call somebody else and sell them some into pet food. This is a long process where they come out and they significant audits on your sites where they want to buy from to make sure obviously the product is safe to ship and safe to use. And so we just got a new major pet food brand that has – is going to beginning to use our product and we are in the late stages with several others as well. We started some of these processes even two to three years ago before we were even making products in our own platform. So we are seeing success there. Even more exciting though is after we announced the 60 Pro success, it wasn’t that we had to make calls out is actually that we got the calls in. We got calls in from around the globe from producers or aquaculture…

Thanks, Todd. I know it’s a great segue into kind of my next question and that is recognizing the 60 pro trial has kind of just concluded and the time you talk to run these programs with the customers, have you seen any change in the time line needed from the first discussions you are having in tests to securing – from long-term offtake knowing the kind of importance of the market sees in those contracts?

Yeah, I think the time will be a lot shorter on the 60 Pro than it will be on the 50 Pro. And Leslie is here, if you want to Leslie maybe comment on what you are seeing, as well to give our shareholders a bit of a view on why 60 Pro is a lot different to the potential customers?

Yes, so, in essence by achieving the 60% mark and possibly even higher, we put ourselves in a different category. So the formulating nutritionists on the aquaculture side and the pet food side has now an ability to use more of the product it fits better in the formulation and lot of these diets are already dialed into using whether it’s soy protein concentrates, corn food meals or fish meals, so it was imperative that we really join that more elite group of ingredients. So that really what opens up and I think due to the tightness in the supply of those markets, the touch points, that’s why we are seeing a lot of inbound calls quite aggressively since this is really the only new scalable source available to many of those customers.

Thanks so much. I’ll leave it a path.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Laurence Alexander of Jefferies. Your line is open.

So, good morning. I just wanted to follow-up on the discussion about the outreach from the aqua feed. What do you see, based on what you are hearing now as the timeline for validation contracts in place to validate the ASPs in a J curve that has been sketched out the last couple of years?

So, go ahead, Leslie.

This is Leslie again.

Yes, so, there will always be the need to test and validate the product within the systems of the farmers and that really is a question that’s really up to them whether they want to do the three months trial in this specific case, why, or whether they want to build some more data by running certain live phases concurrently. So we accept with our own internal validation efforts having been take off that we can actually supply a lot of data ahead of time. So that we don’t have to do this with each customer. But traditionally you could see still a time between three to six months is to really get to the level of what’s the optimal inclusion rate of the product.

So that would imply that you should have – did it speak to the J curve economics by early next year?

We believe we are on track for that. Correct.

And I guess, just secondly, if you look at kind of the new opportunities on the bio fuel, that are opening up on the biofuel front, from a paper allocation business focus perspective, do you view $1 of EBITDA as the same if it’s from bio fuels or from dextrose? Or do you also look at the relative valuations of fuel companies and food ingredient companies? And sort how does that change your incentive to participate in the next wave of biofuel projects that might be on the horizon?

From our standpoint, what – we’ll get capital allocation is recurring and predictable cash flows. And so, while bio fuels is going to have some spikes and obviously like we’ve seen as well as some weaknesses like we’ve seen, when we look at our dextrose and glucose business that we believe will develop over the next several years, those are going to be recurring, predictable cash flows and non-volatile, because we believe we will enter into partnerships and supply agreements and co-location opportunities with potential partners. And so, capital will – while certainly bio fuels are still subject to policy, when we look at our dextrose and glucose opportunity, it’s really not subject to policy. This is just subject to when it’s available we believe the demand is therefore and that’s really evidenced by, again, the calls in, it’s not the calls out, it’s now the calls in now that we’ve kind of had success and now we do also have what we didn’t say here is, we now have York has the capability to run not just that, but continues, as we put new – a unit operations in there frying exchange and refining. So that should also continue to show our success and our capability to make this product. And so, again, allocation will yet – or capital allocation first and foremost will go against things that are predictable, recurring and expanding which will expand our gross margin percentages. And obviously, we are still going to make a lot of fuel for a while. So it’s great to see some expanding opportunities there. But it’s all going to be around any capital allocation there would be just for grind expansion, so that we can make more proteins and oils and sugars and the by product is ethanol, that’s fine, but it has to be around recurring and predictable cash flows.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Ken Zaslow of BMO. Your question please.

Hey, good morning, guys.

Good morning.

Hey, of that $0.25 that you guys referenced, how much of that is within your control, will it would be high protein and corn oil?

Yeah, I mean, basically, that’s the reason we use that number is we’ve seen ethanol margins come up and a high percentage of that is within our control. But also the fact that April is done and half of the rest of the quarter is done. We believe that’s in our control. If the market were to close out right now, we would be greater than that. But we are being conservative in our estimates as there has been a lot of volatility as of late in the ethanol margin. But if the market were to – if today was the end of the quarter and margins were they are today, we would exceed those numbers.

And then let me rephrase, so, of the $0.25, how much of that is high protein and corn oil?

Yeah, like, I mean, basically, when we look at it, it’s – it will be in that somewhere between – well, I mean, we are not – we aren’t isolated like that. But we’d give you a guidance for the year which is $140 million to $160 million in corn oil a quarter and we give you – or per year and $40 million to $60 million on our protein initiatives. And so, but a large percentage of that $0.25 today is coming from those two products. And that’s why we had said if the market closed out today, we’d be higher than that for the ethanol is positive.

Okay. As you start to develop your – all these products and you balance your longer term story with the short-term, can you talk about how your current operation is relative to the industry? I think if I were to look at it - that margin structure, it seems like it’s lower than that of the industry at this point and I guess that you are investing for the future. But I get the sense that the investors are looking a little bit more for balance between, hey, we want good operations and being able to deliver margins in line with some of your peers as well as we like the – on the Sunday for the future, but it should kind of figure out how you are balancing that and it doesn’t seem like it’s a full balance and how do you go forward from here?

Well, the going forward is a balance now. I think that, we are very confident that if we were in the spot every day, we would be at the market average basis what else you are seeing. I mean, it really took us, we’ve eaten a lot of absorption for over the last several years, because the projects are longer because of COVID. But now that they are complete, we believe last quarter was basically our last quarter of negative fixed cost absorptions that were driving some results. Obviously it was a quarter of increasing a stellar grain prices but I think we all have the same opportunity there. But in general, I would say, Q2 will represent more fairly and adequately where we will stand in the future relative to others and I think you’ll see us at or better than what we’ve done in the past relative to that spread and so - or well better than that spread and possibly exceeding some of those expectations. So, we are there now. I mean, now – our guys just start to make sure our plants run every day. Obviously, rail service was something that – it hit us hard last quarter, it’s not hitting us as hard this quarter. But we’ve done a really good job keeping our plants open. But overall, I believe you’ve seen probably one of the – or is going to be the last quarter where we see any negative absorption from our old projects. So, we are basically at rate today.

Okay. My last question is, if I go forward, would you expect at anytime in the next couple of years or anytime that you have a negative EBITDA again and what will be the situation in which that would occur, if you guys are building this resilient model? And I’ll leave it there.

Yeah, I mean, obviously, a quarter where ethanol just completely is negative. Obviously, we have to watch that, but no, I don’t believe unless ethanol obviously is up to the industry from that standpoint, but I think the industry is gaining momentum on a lot of other opportunities, but also from the standpoint of the fuel, and then also we’ve seen out of some of the E 15 initiatives, we are going to watch that closely. But the industry is obviously at times oversupplied and undersupplied. So, I would hope that there is no other occurrences like that, but if ethanol margins completely would tank for some reason, obviously, we will be at risk of that. But in general, I don’t see an environment as we move into more of our protein and continue to expand our oil yields where we are at today. And then obviously, if we – when we get the sugar, I don’t see an environment that would take us that low, because then, basically, the industry is completely in negative variable contribution margin. So, our hope is that, it doesn’t happen again, but obviously, can’t predict completely every quarter in the future, but I think we are set up well to defend against that.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Ben Bienvenu of Stephens. Your line is open.

Hey. Thanks. Good morning.

Good morning.

I want to ask about the corn oil, just given the value that the market is presenting and the validation of the CI score associated with it relative to other vegetable oils, how do you decide what to do with that? Whether you just sell it into the other markets or establish offtake agreement and as you think about the potential for offtake agreements, what are the things that you are looking for – to make sure that it’s in the best interest of maximizing the value of the corn oil you produce?

Yeah, I think, it’s a little bit of everything. Basically there is ways if you put on a forward sale, obviously the bean oil futures market trades very similar in terms of moves and you can participate in upside rallies by hedging some of that in bean oil, because it does have a high correlation, because once the spread is established, you are basically highly correlated to bean oil and you could use that as a hedge. After that, then you determine how much you want to keep open, how much you want to sell forward. We are open on a significant portion of our forward book and we are evaluating that and we are seeing better bids for the last half of the year than we have seen before. I think there is more demand coming on in the last half that some of the buyers are beginning to worry about where they are going to source. They are low carbon oils, because when you look at end products, because when you look at fats, kellos, ucos in corn oil, our estimate is there is only about 15 billion pounds of that available on that market. On top of that obviously another 25 billion pounds of soybean oil. But when you look at the availability of low carbon oils, there is one or two players that could take all of that and then the rest of it’s left to some of the higher carbon score products. So, we feel like we are in a really good position. We’ve seen bids of the last half of the year that had premiums to soybean oil. Obviously, you’ve seen a big inverse in the soybean oil market, but there is still deep demand for our products. And so from our standpoint, we…

Yeah. Okay. That makes sense. With respect to clean sugar, the announcement of Shenandoah as the first facility, was that purely a tax-driven decision, tax incentive-driven decision? And how long should we expect kind of the spool up process for that to get to full production capacity? And maybe second part of the question, at what point do you decide or what are the things that you are considering when you decide how many plants you want to convert to sugar as you look across your portfolio? And that’s all I have. Thank you.

No, it wasn’t a tax incentive decision necessarily. I think we could have probably achieve similar results anywhere we would want to put that plant. Shenandoah is really special place. Obviously, one of our best most profitable plants, as a standalone plant, but first place that we had high protein and performing very well. It performs at rates every – almost every operating day and we see yields and proteins under our control now in terms of pressing higher yields and managing our protein levels. So we’ve had a lot of earnings there. So we have a great operating staff that is really ready for new technologies now. And so, what we want to show is the future and the future is going to be what Shenandoah will look like, which is a combination of all the technologies and all the IP that we have. And there is also an opportunity for co-location, as well. So, we’ve been talking to potential co-location partners viewing over the fence opportunities and Shenandoah is very unique from a workforce standpoint as well and kind of where it’s located from a rail and a transport standpoint. So, when we look at it, we are going to a 30,000 to 40,000 bushel a day system, which is they grind, that’s about little less than half their grind, maybe 40% of their grind will go into sugar and the rest will still go into alcohol. And so, our first choice was really around best location for – to show a full bio refinery in a modern day with co-location partners with the opportunity for tax incentives with a great workforce that can deliver on what we want to do and close to Omaha. And so, that’s how we decided on that. From there it’s going to be what the customer is looking for. We think actually one of the best locations we have is in Madison. It can hit – it could really hit all parts of the country, as well as river and rail and truck access and we’ll look at that one as well as probably best on the list. But really it comes down to the customer and with the customer where they want to be with the product they are going to make and where they want to be with the product that we need to ship to them. What I find really interesting about this is that the calls are coming in on this, there seems to be big interest from a lot of mid-sized guys that are looking for new opportunities to source glucose and dextrose and food grade and industrial grade. And we believe we have a great standalone technology that we can build with our systems and the IP to support it.

Okay. And Todd, just on the timing of the ramp up of the facility?

Yeah, we should break ground middle to third quarter of this year. In Shenandoah, we are engineering today. We have started to order some long lead time equipment. We expect to be running about a year after that. And one thing is it, we are running in York today and again, we brought in what we thought was the last step that we needed to do in York, which was around refining and the ability to get to food and industrial grade. And now have been able to see that as well. So that really is what gave us with the confidence to move forward and just increase the size and do another standalone facility.

Okay. Great. Thank you so much. Best of luck.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Steve Byrne of Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Todd, can you talk a little bit about the characteristics of the residual DDGs after you extracted the 60% plus protein in the 1.4 on the corn oil. Was the quality of that DDG still comparable to kind of generic DDG or do you see any risks in the value of that?

I’ll let Leslie answer that question.

Yes. Thank you for addressing that other value-added product. So, when we take the protein and we move it into the 60% protein product category, in essence the traditional DDG product really becomes a fiber product. So, the energy density of that product is still very high and that’s ultimately when you look at the formulation of those products in to ration – is really the most critical point. So, while we are going to do some more validation on that particular product, right now we actually see some interesting side-effects if you will on that product that could lead for better applications versus the DDG. But as I said, we still need some additional data points to start making that – or taking that position.

And, Todd, in your comments earlier about evaluating the alcohol-to-jet technologies and there is a few of them out there, what is your assessment of those? And do you think any of them might be a good fit for your plants? It seems like you are a little bit cautious about the bio fuels given the volatility in ethanol, but the airline industry doesn’t have too many options and that would seem the alcohol-based approach could be so much more cost competitive than the vegetable oil-based approach to sustainable aviation fuel. Do you share that view?

I share that view, but I think that’s a long game. And so, we have to focus on for Green Plains is obviously what we can achieve in the short and medium term and then, I think, ultimately this industry is going to produce alcohol-to-jet. I think it’s going to produce it from several technologies, some that are available today and some that are developing that we have seen as well. I think it’s really what baselines – besides what we are doing on protein, oil, sugar and then obviously decarbonization, I don’t think today it’s as easy to buy in ethanol plants than it was five years ago. I think if you want to buy one, there are few deals out there maybe, but I think the prices have gone up. And I think they’ve gone up because of everything that’s going on with us, but also everything that’s going on with lots of other producers that are developing their own differentiating technologies and opportunities. It’s really not just everything we are doing. There is some great work being done on lowering your energy use, great working being done on making more cellulosic ethanol out of your corn-based ethanol, as well. That’s coming our way. I think in the future as this industry to take care of some of the low carbon fuel markets that are looking for cellulosic. I think there is, as I said, biomass heat and electricity that are coming your way, renewable, solar and wind are going to be powering some of these plants. And then that go on. I mean I think – and then we got alcohol-to-jet on top of everything we are doing. So, I think some of these plants go into chemical like we’ve talked about. It starts with dextrose and…

Thank you.

Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Adam Samuelson of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hi guys. Thanks. Good morning everyone.

Good morning, Adam.

Morning. So, I think the first question, just as we wrap up, rolling it together between kind of the updates on clean sugar, on 60% protein and the roadmap for next few plants that are getting built, the new DCO+ technology, which it sounds like might accelerated if it was a non-high pro plants in the near term. What’s the latest thinking on CapEx for this year and even kind of next year if you are really thinking about how you are facing different projects? And are you seeing kind of inflation on some of the capital cost for some of these things to restructure?

Yeah, I’ll just – the last question first, which is, yeah, we definitely have seen inflation across the board in every aspect of our business. We’ve seen it on wage inflation for retention and attraction. I think but everybody seen that’s a opportunity inflation. I think that obviously, construction costs continue to something we watch closely on some of the commodity parts of our build, we’ve seen some inflation on some of the other stuff we locked in, we’ve taken care of that especially with the fact that we have our partnership with Vegan. So we have labor onsite every day and we are pressing to potentially add night shifts, as well to get these done even faster, because we have so much opportunity around the 60 pro. And then, obviously, on DCO+, I mean, I think what’s – it’s the second question on DCO+, yes, where, in Minnesota where we probably can build this fast. We still want to build in Fairmont and Otterdale, but in the mean time, we could put up a DCO+ system and we’ve had incredible enquiries at Fluid Quip from outside parties, other independents that want to look at this technology as well, because it’s a very quick payback. Two to three year, very quick payback on the current oil prices, which I think really and I’ll let Patrich talk about the cap expense it’s really still basically on track to what we talked about. But I think what it illustrates is the value of Fluid Quip as well. We bought into a technology company with significant IP portfolios and we are just starting to see some of the beginning of that. There is more to come with what they have and what they’ve been working on, which I think is a hidden jam within Green Plains that has great partners in it, as well. And if you take a look at the value of Green Plains today, just take our oil prices alone and our oil contribution margins and you are getting everything else for free as somebody has said in the past. So, and on top of that, Fluid Quip, value of Fluid Quip’s IP portfolio and technology company on top of that, I think Green Plains is setting itself up for great opportunities and great upside, but again, yes, we have to get through the noise of what we saw in some of these economics of fuel. But I think we are moving past that as well. Patrich, do you want to comment on CapEx?

Sure, as I mentioned earlier, our guidance of $250 million to $300 million remains fairly solid for the year depending on construction schedules. For the following year, probably more $150 million, that’s not including any change it might be with respect to further development in clean sugar and some of the other things that Todd is talking about. But as it relates to protein and maintenance cap, that’s probably what we are looking at for next year?

So, as we’ve seen in Minnesota projects real quick, and follow-up, the Minnesota project is pushing into 2024. Obviously, we are going to put DCO+ there, which again John is a major contributor and so kind of keeps us on track, which is why we are confident on our 2024, 2025 numbers, but that just, some of that was that’s gets funded through free cash as well as we start to generate that when everything starts to come on. But we are well positioned from a balance sheet standpoint to execute.

Okay. Alright. That’s helpful. And if I can just maybe switch gears and follow-up a question on the ethanol markets often, obviously there is other volatility year-to-date. One of the things that’s little bit harder to see in the real time data is the export picture and just wondering kind of how you frame kind of exports at this juncture if you are seeing incremental opportunities kind of emerge with, especially in Europe with refining, processing, octane cost over there. Is that maybe providing a nice bet to the U.S. market right now?

I don’t know that it’s making a huge impact today, but I think it’s going to in the later part of this year starting now. I think year-to-date, we are just basically status quo. We have seen some are – open up into Brazil. You saw their ethanol production down last week. I think the European opportunity around octane still sits there. I think E-15 for the summer will continue to grow and expand. And I think we just need to get out of these – this weather pattern that we are in and get the consumer driving and buying gasoline again, and then kind of get into the full summer driving season, which is I think is a bit delayed. Part of it is also the ability to move products right now still remains challenging although we’ve done better this quarter that our plants – in terms of getting service in some of our plants last quarter, but we still see challenges across the industry, which is providing opportunities for us for some dislocations at some of the destination markets including the ability to just sell export. While there is stocks out there, it doesn’t mean there is extra capacity just to go sell exports. So, but I think the demand will be there. I think that where we are priced in a world as a molecule is very favorable from a octane standpoint. And so I am constructive for the last eight or nine months of the year – eight months of the year.

Okay. That color is really helpful. I’ll pass it on. Thanks.

Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Kristen Owen of Oppenheimer. Your line is open.

Thank you. Good morning.

Good morning.

Todd, you touched on this in kind of the responses that you’ve provided, but I am wondering if you could put a finer point around just the learning cycles that you’ve been able to achieve with the MSC conversions at Shenandoah and now at Wood River. Just from an engineering standpoint, what that does for utilization and throughput as you think about ramping this next tranche of facilities in the back half of the year?

Yeah, that’s a great question and we learned a lot. I mean, it was definitely something that we had to learn how to run these systems, because it really is moving from dry milling into more of a wet milling technology and so, our expertise was in dry milling. And so we now have our head of protein operations is a 20 year wet miller who understands how to run and train up our workforce for running these technologies going forward. So we learned a lot. Shenandoah continue to provide challenges, but now it just runs every day at rate consistently as we have dialed in what we needed to do and there was some mechanical and engineering fixes we needed to do in terms of design. We’ve fixed all those and now, I mean, going back towards with the last year, we’ve just been running that plant and now we learned how to dial it up and dial it down if we make a little too high protein, we can dial it down and have higher yields and if we want higher protein we can dial it up and we could do it on the fly. So we’ve learned a lot there. We’ve entered those learnings and applied them to Wood River, Wood River somewhat similar. We needed some engineering. Once we started up, we realized there is some deficiencies. It took us a little while to get that started and then before CPP, we’d ever do the 60 Pro trial. We wanted to make sure that plant was running at rate, as well and at rate every day and we got to that as well. So, and then, we went to the 60 Pro trial. Where we will start up the next three? All of those operators are training at Wood River or Shenandoah. So, they are ready to run systems. The understand the systems. So it’s a learning curve and I think each plant gets better as we started up and each plant gets the rate faster. And each plant we learn how to dial up and dial down what we want to do with those plants and now with the learnings from what we were able to achieve in 60 pro, those are very, very valuable as we went to full rate and for example, the Central City operators were there for that, thinking and looking at that, as well as thinking about how they are going to run Central City when it starts up. So, a lot of learnings, but we are at the point now where we have a great workforce as well as a new head of protein operations that is really very serious about consistency and quality.

That’s very helpful. And my follow-up question is actually another simple question, but more on the commercialization side, I mean, Patrich, you called out sort of the $23 million to $24 million consistent spending in SG&A, but just wondering, do you need to invest in commercialization rate versus do you need to add folks to that side of the house in order to see some of these opportunities come to fruition? Thank you so much.

Yeah, this is Todd again. I think when we looked at, that was the overall including plant SG&A. I mean, how we’ve looked at corporate? Yeah, corporate cost have gone up a little bit. So we made the investment but the bigger portion of corporate cost was an overall 15% to 20% increase in wages over the last 12 months and that’s all wages, not – that’s from everyone from accounts to traders to sales people to IT across the board we’ve seen as everybody has. So I think we are in a good steady place right now and that was inclusive of building out a – what we believe is a great structure around marketing sales and technology. And so, yeah, we now have a point where we are at fill in stages of what we need to best get our product to market but the base is there. And I think I invite anybody to come to see our innovation centers between Shenandoah, York, and Omaha. We have three now that have validated the whole product and can make commercial products for our partners and obviously, you have to pre-invest. When you want to sell a product for $800, $900 or $1,000 a ton, we did some pre-investment into our sales and marketing and technology people and processes. And I think we are getting the benefit of that now, so that when somebody in global aquaculture calls, they can talk to everybody from somebody in a feed mill that makes the feed, somebody in an aqua lab that feeds the fish, a aquaculture nutritionist which is a PhD that talks about the beneficial aspects of this protein and so on. And so that has been invested in, but you have to invest in that to sell high quality products like this at higher prices.

Thank you so much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Craig Irwin of ROTH Capital Partners. Your line is open.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. So, Todd, really just a housekeeping question here. Can you talk a little bit about the utilization today, now that Project 24 is complete and behind you? And maybe if you could share with us any color about additional turnarounds either in the second quarter or planned before the end of this summer driving season and what kind of outages do you need for the three high pro plants to come online for the end of the year?

The last question first. We don’t take plant outages when we bring on high pro systems. We basically turn on the high pro system and the stillage – whole stillage out of fermentation will just flow into there, instead of flowing to our traditional drier system. So that’s number one. We are in our last outage at Shenandoah and just coming up, I think as we speak and that was basically take care of – this half of the year outages. And part of a lot happened in March and April, especially in March during lower run rates and a little bit leftover in April, and then the last one here recently. So, we are in a really good position for the rest of the year. We’ll still go through some normal outages at the last half of the year. Those already are planned. So I think we are going to start to run. Our goal basically is to start to run above 90% in that 95% area not subject to on planned downtime. So we are seeing that right now and we saw it – we are seeing it as we speak and I think going forward, that’s really going to help to lower the volatility of our operating platform and just so we can just focus on rolling these technologies out, grinding as much corn as we can to get as much of the oil and the protein out of it and letting our plants just run after the investments we’ve made in our Project 24 modernization plans.

Thank you. My next question is really a macro question. I guess, maybe, a trade-off - you might appreciate this question, but when we look at the price of crude or palm oil which is the highest volume that we have in the market. It’s up more than 35% from the beginning of the year. The rest the complex haven’t really moved at the same rate, but usually palm oil does lead the path. If we look at corn oil prices over the last few months it was basically flattish yet we have done many deals coming online shortly in Port Arthur and others, I would say, almost transact to buy their feedstock. What do you think we need to see for the veg oil complex or more specifically, corn oil decline in prices is something you are constructive on at the moment or are you still so much conservative about the outlook for corn oil pricing, I think something in the $0.80 to $0.85 range is reasonable?

Yeah, I think going forward, I think you could, I mean, it’s obviously based on the bigger oil feeds complex globally. But we are seeing obviously with Ukraine and the reduced sun seed production, Canada in reduced acres, weather in South America and obviously what we are dealing with here on the planting season in terms of in the U.S., I still think there is obviously – especially on the forward curve upside potential in all of these oils – for veg oils. And so, what we are seeing in the spot market versus the end of the year, you see soy bean oils is somewhat backward dated, but we are starting to see bids show up in the last half of the year and it’s a little bit driven by what you talked about some new demand coming on, others worrying where are they going to get some of the corn oil and the low carbon feedstocks after basically their own UCO or kello supply chain. So I think we are in a good position. I can’t predict whether it’s going to be 75 or 95 but I think it’s still going to remain firm in terms of bean oil and which leads to obviously firm corn oil prices. And we’ll have to see what happens from there, but I think we are in a really, really good position to execute and we will continue to drive as much as oil as we can out of this current corn. There is still oil left by the way and there is still another half a ton oil after we get to one three and one four and now we have to figure out how to go after that as a company and as an industry. And we are continuing to keep all our technology in that way, but we believe we are in a pretty good place from a margin contribution for quite a long time out of this veg oil complex. If veg oil goes too low, it’s just some sense obviously additional RD, renewable diesel production to get built and if it goes too high, obviously, the ones that are being built or running. It’s – they are set up well and it’s going to come down to energy price as well which looks like at least for the short and medium term. Diesel prices remains strong, gas fuel prices remains strong and oil prices remains strong. So I think that’s overall bullish to our overall corn oil position.

Excellent. Congrats on the strong execution.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Eric Stine of Craig-Hallum. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, everyone.

Morning.

Good morning. Just maybe sneak one in here at the end. Can you just give updated thoughts if you were to roll out the 60% plus yields across the platform? What that would do to your EBITDA plan, whether it’s – what you’ve put there for 2024 and beyond?

Yes, if we can execute the 60 Pro strategy and if I can only just dose me for a second, we always thought while we are building for 50 Pro, we’re really building for 60 Pro, because 60 Pro becomes an ingredient. It becomes a product. It doesn’t become a commodity. And so, once you start hitting with a six in front of it, and going from there, you attract a very, very different opportunity. And so, if you think about where we are going to have, which is approximately 700,000 tons of a 60 plant base fermented product, that’s really not that much product relative to the demand that is there and waiting for more products to come on. So that’s the real opportunity with this technology, which is why obviously we made the investment that we did not only in the assets but in the technology itself, because that was the dream and the dream was to make 60 Pro plus and we did it. And now it’s a function of how fast can we get it to market and accelerate away from even these lower proteins which are still high obviously, but accelerate away from that. So when you look at our – you can blue sky it all you want and start using $800,or $900 a ton for a baseline product like this and continue to potentially go up from there. You can see what the possibility is and so if you get to 2024, on a billion gallons or so, and you are making 60 Pro and oil prices are sitting at $0.80 or $0.85, I think you could see that – those numbers that we’ve outlined in the past would probably be low. But we have a lot of work to do to get…

Okay. That’s helpful. Thanks.

Thank you.

Thank you. At this time, I’d like to turn the call back over to Todd Becker for closing remarks. Sir?

Yeah, thanks everybody and thanks for coming on the call today. Obviously, a lot to talk about. It’s we are looking forward, we believe we are in a great place. All of our plants are back to rate. That’s the first thing. Our margins obviously have come off with the lows of the first quarter and we are able to take advantage of some of that strong product pricing on corn oil and obviously now it’s the 60 Pro conversion. We continue to also build customers in 50 Pro. As I indicated, we now got a new approval after multiple years of audits for new pet food customers and we are working on more and we expect more to come from – for our product. It’s a unique product and how we are approaching it every day in the market. And so, when you look at all of that and combine it with our opportunities around sugar and decarbonization, I think we are well set up getting to our ‘23, ‘24 and ’25 strategy. And there is nothing that we see today that doesn’t say we can’t accomplish those goals and obviously a strong balance sheet is leading the way with a curve that keeps our balance with a margin curve that keeps our balance sheet strong and ultimately getting into 23 and 24, even stronger. And I think we are well positioned to achieve success. So thanks for coming on the call today and we’ll update you next quarter. Thank you.

This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating and you may now disconnect.