Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Gevo Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, John Richardson. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, everyone. This is John Richardson, Gevo's Director of Investor Relations. Thanks for joining us to discuss Gevo's second quarter results for the period ended June 30, 2022. I'd like to start by introducing today's participants from the company. With us today are Dr. Patrick Gruber, Gevo’s Chief Executive Officer; Tim Cesarek, Gevo's Chief Commercial Officer; and Lynn Smull, Gevo's Chief Financial Officer. Earlier today, we issued a press release that outlines the topics we plan to discuss. A copy of this press release is available on our website at www.gevo.com. Please be advised that our remarks today including answers to your questions contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These forward looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be materially different from those currently anticipated. Those statements include projections about the timing, development, engineering, financing and construction of Gevo's sustainable aviation fuel projects, its sales agreements, its renewable natural gas project and other activities described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are incorporated by reference. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements. In addition, we may provide certain non-GAAP financial information in this call. The relevant definitions and GAAP reconciliations may be found in our earnings release and 10-Q, which can be found on our website at www.gevo.com in the Investor Relations section. Following the prepared remarks, time permitting, we'll open the call to your questions. I would like to remind everyone that this conference call is open to the media, and we are providing simultaneous webcast to the public. A replay will be available via the company's Investor Relations page at www.gevo.com. I would now like to turn the call over to the CEO of Gevo, Dr. Patrick Gruber. Pat?

Thanks, John. Good afternoon, everyone and thanks for joining our call today. We filed our Form 10-Q earlier today, and we ask that you refer to it for more detailed information. Our team had fantastic momentum as we exited the first quarter of this year. We announced two new SAF supply agreements; one with Delta, another with British Airways in the first quarter for a combined 105 million gallons per year. We maintained that momentum through the second quarter and beyond. Since the first quarter, Gevo's business development team has done a great job to close five additional supply agreements with American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, Japan Airlines, Finnair and Aer Lingus for a combined total volume of 155 million gallons per year of SAF. Collectively then, Gevo now has over 350 million gallons per year of committed SAF offtake that has an applied hydrocarbon revenue value estimated at over $2 billion per year, inclusive of the market -- inclusive of the value of the environmental benefits and based on current market projections and operating assumptions. Now that brings us meaningfully closer to our production goal and sales goal of 1 billion gallons per year of 2030. It's tremendous progress. I'm proud of our team. And what's even better is they're all -- they're take-or-pay agreements, and that helps us. Now it's good momentum for SAF and our systematic approach driving down carbon intensity, the customer base buys into what we're doing. It's inclusive of our whole supply chain from growing of raw materials to the burning of jet fuel. And we continue to believe that net zero carbon negative fuels can be produced profitably. That's what all the data keeps saying. We haven't slowed down either. Our team continues to discuss and negotiate agreements with other potential partners, including strategic…

Thanks, Pat. First of all, I'd like to thank all the airline and trading companies that have joined our crusade for their continued confidence in Gevo's capability and vision. The importance of sustainable agriculture to the production of both nutrition and ultra-low carbon sustainable aviation fuel and transportation fuels has been acknowledged by these companies through their multiyear commitments to Gevo. We continue to see demand for low-carbon SAF exceeding supply for the next decade and beyond by as much as a factor of 12 times. Based on what we're seeing, we believe the SAF market size is 10 million to 30 billion gallons over the next two decades. On the supply side, currently announced SAF projects total approximately 2.4 billion gallons globally. Gevo's goal of one billion gallons of fuel production by 2030 should be easily absorbed by the level of demand that is expected. While not distracting from our ethanol to jet production build-out, it's important to note, that we continue to consider ways to progress our isobutanol platform to supply low-carbon renewable gasoline blendstocks and SAF. Additionally, both the ethanol to jet and isobutanol platforms can supply chemicals, which is an area of rising interest with our customers. Our chemical products have the potential to be significantly carbon negative based on the great model. The world hasn't seen drop-in products that can drive down CI score like this. It will be exciting to see how the market determines the value of these products. It's important to note, that the ethanol to jet and isobutanol platforms, also have operational and product synergies and can optimize our cash cost and product position on the same platform overtime. In short, they're complementary, and I anticipate you'll all see more on these efforts in the future. So based on our volume of executed take-or-pay contracts, we have proven the strong demand for SAF exists. We continue to secure additional contracts. And we'll supply the market for volume beyond 2027. However, going forward, our team will focus attention on securing partners in the energy transition space, as well as traditional energy companies and strategic financial groups who can help us grow faster. Further, we continue to screen and secure greenfield facility builds. And we will also look to partner with existing ethanol producers who are keen to decarbonize, where it creates value and accelerates our time for production. Finally, I expect our commercial efforts will build off our Verity tracking platform, which, as you know, is in development. This will help us secure customers differentiate us and our users, who believe in the vision of tracking and counting carbon across every link of the value chain. Now I'll turn the call over to Lynn, to comment on the quarter's financial highlights. Lynn?

Thank you, Tim. We ended the second quarter of 2022 with a strong liquidity position of $546.8 million in cash, restricted cash and other liquid investments. We realized $139 million of net proceeds from the issuance of common stock and common stock warrants in the June 2022 offering. Long-term debt outstanding of $67 million is related to the Northwest Iowa RNG project. Our corporate spend that is SG&A was approximately $6 million for the quarter, net of non-cash stock-based compensation. During the second quarter of 2022, we invested approximately $15 million in capital projects comprised of $6 million into our Net-Zero 1 project, $8 million into the Northwest Iowa RNG project and approximately $1 million into other capital projects. Construction on our Northwest Iowa project is complete and it is being placed into service in Q3. Depreciation will start flowing through the income statement at that point. We continue the development and finance efforts around Net-Zero 1. There is substantial interest from lenders and Net1's project financing. The actual debt structuring and financing efforts will ramp up later this year to drive towards a debt close in 2023 after the project delivery contracts and final costs have been locked in. We're also engaged in discussions around equity partners in Net-Zero 1 and our Net Zero program overall. We'd welcome an equity partner or partners to preserve our development capital for subsequent plants while still giving Gevo meaningful permanent project equity positions. I'd also note that the Senate passed draft Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 is a positive development for Gevo given both the SAF blenders tax credit and the clean fuel production credit for SAF or CP -- sorry, CFPC were included for a total of five years. The CFPC would take effect for production in 2025. To qualify for this new tax credit, SAF producers must produce fuel with at least a 50% reduction in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions when compared to petroleum jet fuel. The SAF credit has an upside of $1.75 per gallon if a Net Zero CI score is received. This is all very good for Net-Zero 1 as we expect our staff will qualify for the CFPC incentive and we could qualify for as much as a cap to $1.75 a gallon if the EPA uses the Argon 3.0 model as its measurement tool since we plan to be net zero under that model. Now I'll turn the call back to Pat. Thank you.

Thanks, Lynn. Yes, there's other good things in that bill as well. There are things like the funding for overall green has reduction programs to build out plants and capacity and things like that, plus they fund some of the DOE programs and the USDA smart agriculture, all those kind of things have potential to benefit us, that's what's pretty exciting. Thanks, Lynn. And operator, now please open up the call for Q&A.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We have a question from Derrick Whitfield with Stifel. Your line is open.

Thanks and good afternoon, all.

Hey, Derrick.

For my first question, I wanted to ask if you could really share your thoughts on potential benefits from the pending IRA legislation, really building on where you ended the conversation. Obviously, the SAP BTC is a positive, but it seems like there's also a potential on the CCS and ITC elements that could benefit your capital costs. Any thoughts you guys could share about those benefits and the payment mechanism will be really appreciated.

Yes. So the way the CCS work for us is that there is one of the pipelines being built not too far away from us. We'll probably look up to that. I would expect us to and then it will go on. And the deal that we make with that would so everyone understands -- we'll be capturing CO2 that comes off for mutation, so it's a doable carbon and we go into the pipeline and it ultimately geologically sequestered. That improves our CI score along the way. And so it helps to add to the margins of our product. And how much it adds is dependent upon California LCFS, how it will be treated under RFS and all the rest, plus then there's the blenders tax credit that we just talked about. So those are things that will be unfolding. If you do the – go model, you'd wind up with carbon negative type CI scores, carbon-negative CI, course. There's nobody who's talking about fuel from carbon negative, but us. And that's because we start with a net zero plan if you had CCS to it, then it goes negative. That's a big deal. And that shows people what's possible here for the future. The other things that are interesting in that bill are one of the DOE programs, good. Those are about energy transition. They funded the UCA Smart climate stuff, that's awesome because this is about sustainable agriculture, bringing in to the overall picture. One of the great tools that this country has available to it is capturing carbon in the soil. It requires that modern -- people use modern farming techniques like low till and no till with precision agriculture, monitor, what's growing, measure carbon and things like that. But those are the kind of programs that are put forth in that bill, and that's a big deal. The other thing that we see is going to be important is hydrogen stuff got funded, wind tax credits got funded, those benefit us because we'll be building hydrogen where, of course, we're working with JUUL Energies to build up the wind. But biogas, I think, there's some stuff in there for that, but I think it will be more important in the farm bill as that gets done because it's related more towards the newer and how to build things there. So overall, there's lots of really interesting stuff in here. It's a question of is it going to get coupled a little bit as it goes through the house and then what is all -- what all the language behind it mean all those things will be interesting to see. But overall, it's like it's pretty encouraging, I'd say.

Certainly. And maybe just tacking on to your response while the plan for decarbonizing your energy sources for NZ1 is likely locked, is there -- when you critically review that legislation to date, could that change your potential or preferred pathway for decarbonizing your production process?

There's nothing in there that would change it like that. The fundamental view for all production plans, this is all ethanol guys, anyone who makes manufactures anything is grid electricity is not green. That's just a simple fact of life. And so people can talk about all the great electricity and all the, hey, I got news. If we want to use it, it creates the footprint for us. And you know what's worse is fossil-based natural gas. That's where the issues lie for all of us who manufacture things. Those have to be substituted out over time if we're going to be successful in reducing the greenhouse gases. So what's interesting about this is I think that people really are grasping this idea of energy transition that will happen over a period of time. It's going to require many different sources of renewable electricity of different routes to get there. Same thing, hydrogen is useful. We can use capture excess electrons from wind, put into hydrogen, we can always get the energy back out of the hydrogen. We'll we can always get the energy back out of the hydrogen. We'll be doing that up at our plant at like Preston. And then I think there is a possibility to do techniques where sequestration comes into play, geological sequestration comes into play where you can do the burning of a natural gas, capture the CO2 from it, sequester it. And so I guess that's blue energy, and you'd wind up reducing the carbon footprint. So all those things are touched upon in this bill. But make no mistake, this is all these things are awfully market-driven. So the government is nice, good, good for them, making progress, great. That will help things. We've got to clear up things. We've got to clear up grid problems, all those kind of things. But you know what, it's all market-driven anyway. And so this ain't going away ever on CI score. And that is a new competitive attribute of which we are 100% focused on.

That's great. And if I could just ask one additional question. Regarding to the chemical products you referred to in your prepared remarks, could you help frame or add some color around the market size and potential de-fossilization [ph] for low-carbon chemical products?

Yes. Here's a really simple way to think of it is that, our business is taking the new raw materials and converting them first in the building blocks. These building blocks are the primary petrochemical things that you get out of a cracker, the ethylene, propylene and butenes. If you know how to make those from renewables and to do them cost effectively, which we do, you can make literally everything that's in the petrochemical, all the big chemical products, you can make them. The technologies are all already exist and all in play already in the chemical industry. The thing that's going to be interesting about our material is that they're massively carbon negative. So think about that. If we burn -- if we take in our manufacturing sustainable aviation fuel, and then it goes to a jet plane and it burns and we're measuring CO2 at the tail versus what the farmer took in a CO2 on the front, and we get to net zero, right? If it's sitting in that same fuel sitting in a tank, would be about a minus 100 CI score, fully sequester carbon sitting there to take, likewise, with these chemical products. So it'd be possible to take and make massively carbon-negative polyethylene, polypropylene, polyester, any of those things. So think of all plastics, all large plastics, think of all those things, all of those are then enabled, and it's not doing anything super special or fancy. It's just simply feeding them into the infrastructure of the chemical industry. That's all that has to happen. You don't need new production to go downstream and do the chemical products, it already exists. We just got to substitute the raw material.

That’s great. Thank for your time and responses.

You bet.

At this time, this concludes our question-and-answer session. I would now turn the call back over to Dr. Gruber for his closing remarks.

Thank you all for joining us. It's an exciting time for us here at Gevo. I'm pleased to be moving forward, like President feels really good, after all this time to get on with it. I appreciate all of our partners who are working with us to do the de-fossilization, de-carbonization. That's going to be a tremendously important thing as we go forth and the solutions are going to be slightly different, each location. And our customers have been great. They've been up learning about how to do sustainable agriculture, how to think about counting carbon and learning to the ins and outs of this whole business, because it is different. We have to account for the whole supply chain. And we are out to drive CI score down. And we are trying to change the whole of the business system together. And so it's a pretty interesting game to play. I'm looking forward to it and getting on with it, and I'm glad our teams are doing such a good job of getting things done. And thank you all for your support in Gevo. With that, have a good afternoon.

This ends our presentation. Thank you for joining us today. You may now all disconnect.