Thank you, Geoff. And thank you all for joining us today. While we continue to make progress on our objectives: Number one, we reduced our costs significantly by $2.2 million in the first quarter compared to last year. We also increased sales of our products by 47% compared to a year ago in the same period. We expect to continue to improve Gevo's cash flow profile as a company as we go forward. It is becoming crystal clear that the world marketplaces are being incented to achieve low greenhouse gases or carbon index, that's referred to as CI. The marketplace is starting to sharpen the focus around that carbon value, that CI, particularly in the EU and in California. We see a path to make Gevo profitable within a couple of years, but continuing to focus on low CI fuels, leveraging ethanol in this hydrocarbon markets, chemical intermediates and protein. We have a very good plant site in Luverne. It's got good corn economics, good transportation, good rail, good logistics. We see an opportunity to drive our carbon footprint down without deploying huge amounts of capital. The improvements we are contemplating making at Luverne, would be designed to benefit anything we do in ethanol, isobutanol, isooctane, jet fuel, or any other product made from our technology made at Luverne. Our plans for Luverne are designed to allow us great optionality and flexibility as we develop the markets for our advanced biofuel technologies. And they should get us to probability without being dependent on large build-outs of IBA, jet and the like. The implication of this is that our burn is expected to decrease, while our margins increase. We're in the midst of finalizing plans to get this done. It's the path for Gevo at this time as it preserves the optionality for our isobutanol, isooctane and alcohol-to-jet fuel products. All of our optionality can be preserved. One other thing that is often lost in all of this discussion, is that a plant like Luverne, it uses corn as a feedstock, and we're currently producing nearly 100 billion pounds per year of animal feed, mostly in the form of protein. The incremental value improvements for protein can meet a lot of value, that's not lost on us, that's going to be an important focus. Why? Food's important, when we talk about biofuels and agriculture, protein matters a lot. Nutrition is all about the protein content and processes that produce more protein in addition to being able to address the market requirements of low-cost carbohydrates, lower the footprint, lower the CI, those are going to be the winners, and we think we have a set of technology that can do that. Now at Gevo, we are all about the low CI fuels then, chemicals and protein. That's the right way to think of us. In addition to our ethanol capabilities, we have technology that breaks out of the ethanol paradigms, getting to the mainstream hydrocarbon fuels, such as jet and gasoline. But we have a chicken and egg dilemma. We need large production capacity to drive production cost down for these hydrocarbon products; we already know how to produce them. We need them at scale, so we can get the economies of scale right. We completed a body of work in the last several months, where we've had a consultant and other advisers look at our economics and validate our economic models. We're pretty confident of what we have in terms of the technology, what its future performance would look like. It's based on solid data, real plants at a real scale. The advantage that we have in getting to advanced low-carbon index hydrocarbon fuels is that when we use IBA as a building block, we have multiple valuable products we can make, jet and isooctane. That's a little bit different than other alcohol-to-jet routes. Both of jet and isooctane have value and potential. Currently, however, we're the only Company in the world that has the ability to make meaningful quantities of renewable isooctane. Remember, isooctane goes into renewable gasoline. There's demand for that. It's one way of putting low-carbon content into mainstream gasoline. We see the potential here to be as great as or greater than that of jet fuel. Now another highlight that occurred this quarter is that the EPA has published a rule enabling 16% isobutanol blends in gasoline for on-road use. Previously, a 16% blend could only be used for off-road use. Having the flexibility to use the 16% blend for on-road use is expected to make it much easier to get through the distribution channels like retail. There is still other logistical challenges to overcome, but this is a great step forward, good for the EPA. I hope they move quickly to finalize the rule. This is potentially a big deal and that it should make it easier to reach more pumps at retail across our larger geography. Another highlight was that the ASTM moved the Glenlivet of our jet fuel that's ATJ from 30% to 50%, that's a final rule. So now our fuel to be blended up to 50%. This is good because it creates the opportunity to take more advantage of the special performance properties of our ATJ, such as, the energy density. Our energy density is higher, means, in theory; you could fly longer out a load of fuel. They have low sulfur, there's a big push across the world to get sulfur out of these dirty fuels. And we can help that, and low particulate, in some areas particulates are going to be banned and restricted. And that's a potential benefit as well in certain geographies in the world. Of course, this is all in addition to the low greenhouse gas emissions. And finally, this quarter I'm glad that we have recently added Tim Cesarek to our team as Chief Commercial Officer and EVP. Tim brings over 20 years of knowledge and experience in strategic and commercial transactions with 15 years in the field of renewable resource-based fuels and chemicals. He's seen a lot. He saw a lot of renewable fuels and chemicals. He is familiar with the competitive technologies across our targeted markets. He knows the companies. He's got an excellent track record in getting good deals done, that's what I want from him here. We're fortunate to have him at Gevo. I'm glad his informed opinion led him to join us. I've asked him to share his thoughts on our business development activities. Tim?