Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Doris, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Gap Inc. Fourth Quarter 2011 Conference call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to introduce your host, Katrina O'Connell, Vice President of Investor Relations.

Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Gap Inc.'s Fourth Quarter 2011 Earnings Conference Call. For those of you participating in the webcast, please turn to Slides 2 and 3. I'd like to remind you that the information made available on this webcast and conference call contains forward-looking statements. For information on factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements, as well as reconciliations of measures we are required to reconcile to GAAP financial measures, please refer to today's press release as well as our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and our most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q, all of which are available on gapinc.com. These forward-looking statements are based on information as of February 23, 2012, and we assume no obligation to publicly update or revise our forward-looking statements. Joining us on the call today are Chairman and CEO, Glenn Murphy; and Executive Vice President and CFO, Sabrina Simmons. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Glenn.

Thank you, Katrina, and good afternoon, everybody. In a few minutes, I'll hand the conference call over to Sabrina, who'll take you through 2011 highlights and also talk to you about our guidance and some key metrics for 2012. So before we get to that, I want to take you through a couple of thoughts I had on this past year and also talk to you about where I see 2012 in terms of the company's strategic plan and what investments we see ourselves making in the upcoming year. In spite of 2011 earnings being below last year, we actually did make quite a bit of progress against our strategic plan. So we have 2 key initiatives that Gap Inc. has been pursuing for the last 4 years that make up our strategic plan. The first key initiative is to reduce our dependency on our North American specialty bricks and mortar business. So we did accomplish quite a bit on that front in 2011. First off, we grew our online business of penetration to our total sales by 2 percentage points. The second thing we did is we reduced our specialty square footage by over 4%, while at the same time growing our outlet square footage domestically by 4%. We closed 65 stores domestically and we opened up 8 Athleta stores, very successful, I may add, and that makes us feel very good about our future for 2012 and beyond. The second area which we made quite a bit of progress is our move to expand our brands internationally. At the beginning of the year, we operate in 31 countries, combination of franchised and company-owned stores, and we ended 2011 by operating in 39 countries. In China, we opened 10 stores. We finished the year with 14 stores and feel…

Thank you, Glenn. Good afternoon, everyone. I'll begin today with a review of our fourth quarter and full year results and then provide an overview of our outlook for 2012. Although 2011 was a challenging year, it's worth pointing out some bright spots in our performance. Throughout the year, we delivered higher average unit retails enabled by our disciplined inventory management. While continuing to invest in our long-term growth initiatives, we tightly managed our operating expenses, which leveraged 30 basis points. We generated $800 million in free cash flow, and finally, we distributed $2.3 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. Please turn to Slide 4 for our earnings recap. In the fourth quarter, net earnings were $218 million and earnings per share were $0.44. Full year net earnings were $833 million and full year earnings per share was $1.56, down 17%. Turning to Slide 5, sales performance. Fourth quarter total sales were $4.3 billion, down 2%. Full year total sales were down 1% to $14.5 billion in comparable sales, which include the associated comparable online sales, were down 4% for the year. Total sales and comps by division are listed in our press release. Turning to Slide 6, gross profit. Since Q1 of 2011, we laid out our view that margins would contract significantly during the year, driven by the sharp escalation in average unit costs, especially in the back half. Further, we also said that we would deliver average unit retails up, but not up enough to offset the increase in average unit costs. The year did indeed play out this way. For the fourth quarter, gross margin was down 540 basis points to 32.8%. Merchandise margins were down 500 basis points, while rent and occupancy deleveraged by 40 basis points. Gross profit was $1.4 billion. For…

That concludes our prepared remarks. We'll now open up the call to questions. [Operator Instructions]

[Operator Instructions] Your first question is from the line of Christine Chen with Needham & Company. Christine Chen - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division: I wanted to ask, as you think about your -- the improved product and your inventory levels, how are you going to balance trying to regain market share and attract traffic versus promotions and the margin hit?

There is a lot in there. What I would say is that we talked in the opening comments about a number of things. One, we are making some investments in our product. And again, we're being selective, we're being targeted, we're making them in some key categories across all our brands. And then, what probably wasn't clear in the opening comments, then if you do that, that's part of the driver as to why you're seeing us put a little bit more marketing money in our domestic business because if you're going to do that, we have to go out either through the windows, in store, through social media, through other tools to let people know that we have either done -- made some investments in key categories like suiting up Banana Republic and there's a list of categories we believe in across all our brands. I believe that's going to generate some attention from customers and turn into traffic for our stores, such as one area in which we're doing that. In terms of promotional activity, I think that we're always challenging our teams, and last year was not necessarily our best year on this front. We were much better at this in 2010, just finding the innovative, really differentiated marketing, value proposition to bring people into the stores. If you look at something Old Navy started in 2012, was called Super C-A-S-H. I think ideas like that, that Gap can have a version. Banana Republic, Athleta and, of course, Old Navy and our outlet stores need to always find what's innovative, what's unique, what does a customer really respond to? I think those 2 things in combination should be enough to at least give us an improvement on the traffic trajectory that we were disappointed in, in 2011.

And I guess all I'll add, Christine, is on the inventory front. As I mentioned in my remarks, we do want to deliver modest top line growth with healthy margins. So that means we really want to watch our inventory and keep it tightly managed, and we'll continue to do so as the year progresses. It will be a great thing if we end up having to chase some inventory because demand begins exceeding the inventories we have. But we'll see how that goes. But the intention is to definitely deliver healthy margins and keep the inventory tightly managed. Christine Chen - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division: And then I guess, just what I've noticed in the stores, it seems like you're backing off on promotions for the broader audience. But for cardholders, the promotion seemed to be a little bit more compelling. Or is that just might bias for you because I have your card?

Yes. I don't know if they're more committed, but probably what you're seeing, if you're a frequent buyer in the company, you're probably seeing more money being spent directly to talk to, whether through e-mail or through CRM. Again, that's part of the marketing investments that I was talking about in the opening comments. And there's an overall move we've been going through at a pace that maybe I'd like to see us accelerate in 2012, which is a little bit more towards person casting and less about broadcast media. That takes a while and there's tools out there. We've actually developed our own proprietary tools in some cases to be able to speak to people directly and not just rely on broadcast media. So that also may be affecting your bias.

And your next question is from the line of Michelle Tan with Goldman Sachs.

Sabrina or Glenn, I was wondering if you could put a little bit more kind of numbers behind, or ranges behind the kind of marketing investments you're thinking about making over the course of the year, is it up low-single digit in terms of budget or are we thinking bigger investment offset by other areas of savings again? And then Sabrina, if you could just give us, if you can, a depreciation number for the year.

Yes, the depreciation and amortization was $475 million, Michelle, and it's on the slide there.

I meant for '12. Is that the...

Yes, that's the number for '12, yes. Now with regard to the rest of your question, I guess, what I would say is we're trying to be helpful by signaling it's likely that we'll deleverage operating expenses for the full year. The reason we're not articulating precise amounts is, quite frankly, because the amount and pacing of some of that spend is really going to flex and depend on our momentum and our confidence in the product, in the momentum of the business, and that those investments will deliver a return. So a lot of this has yet to unfold. I hope what you can count on us on is to manage all of those levers responsibly and our commitment is really around delivering on that EPS range we put out there.

And just to build on my last answer, some of the marketing we're putting in front to our customers is in some new media that we probably have not put as much money behind in the past and what we haven't decided to do just yet, is make that a brick-in, break-out [ph] investment. But of course, if we can get through the person casting and through the new media work we're doing, some proprietary tools that we built in the latter part of 2011, get the traction we want to get, then we can forego and reduce on some of the traditional broadcast media we've had. So we're going to see how that plays out, just like Sabrina said.

Yes. And in Q1 in particular, since we're in this quarter, to be helpful, I will tell you we are making those investments and you should expect marketing to be up in the quarter and it's driven by what Glenn outlined.

And your next -- I'm sorry [Operator Instructions] And your next question is from the line of Laura Champine with Collins Stewart.

My question is really on the fashion side. I mean, Glenn, can you talk about what you're seeing that gives you some confidence in the new product that you got launching this spring and later this year?

I can't comment directly on how it's performing inside the store. What I can say is that, and I could take an exhaustive answer here and go brand by brand, but it was commented at the beginning of the call on product. The change we made in New York City was, that was a seismic shift for us because it really is bringing together the domestic design teams, the international design teams under one full global design team in New York City for Gap. So that team worked for about 10 months together. They worked through processes, and we had to make sure we're all aligned on our global aesthetic and there was work being done. We'd all agreed 2011 was not our best foot forward at Gap. So that work just showed up in the store on February 10, a little later in some of our global markets, but February 10 in North America. Then -- so there's a lot in there that I feel good about. The work from, in terms of the talent and bringing together those 2 teams, then the addition of the Creative Advisor role under Tracy. I'm starting to see, at least, and I was in New York just recently, how they're working together, what decisions from a fashion and basic, the balance of the assortment and the decisions those teams are making. I think they're really crystal clear on the aesthetic going forward. The Banana Republic team, they start going through, not the same seismic shift that went on at Gap, but they addressed some of their concerns in Women's and obviously because there's a reported number that helped. The Banana Republic team have a 6 comp in January. I believe they've been on top of making the changes they needed to make about 6 months ago. And there's some similar changes going on at Old Navy. So all in all, with the trends in the marketplace, which are really highlighted by a real focus on color and demand of color, given our brands and what, the American aesthetic they stand for and the work that we've done to actually take corrective measures because we keep saying internally that anybody can have a good month. We don't want to perform well and above where we've been, which is our commitment, based on the fact we're just lucky on a trend. We want to actually make changes in the business that affect our business performance.

Got it. And then just as a follow-up. When you talk about investing in the product this year, is that on -- would you expect that to happen more on the fashion product or on the basic side?

The focus is really on what do we feel good about from a category perspective. We can dominate on, we can differentiate the marketplace. The word I always use is what are the assets of the company. So one of the examples that we're going to be putting, because we've tested some of these things. We haven't just done it starting this year and it's going to happen throughout the year is babyGap. Clearly, an asset of the organization that cannot be commoditized and where it makes sense in key categories, our design teams have put the case forward that they can get paid for, which is another filter you have to go through in my book and put the investments behind it. There's different ways to judge the success of products, but one of them is just are the fabrics right? And is it actually in keeping with where you look at your competitive set or will your customers actually notice it and most importantly, will they pay for it?

[Operator Instructions]

And your next question is from the line of Roxanne Meyer.

My question is regarding the international business. It's obviously a key strategic priority that you're clearly excited about. Huge, global opportunity. Can you help us appreciate how -- some of the metrics that you're seeing with your international business, how it's performing, how some of the comp classes have been doing for us to really get excited about the promise as we move throughout the years?

Roxanne, I'd say 2011 was a bit of a mixed bag. So if I start at the top, we feel very good about our franchise business. We opened up in 8 new countries in 2011. We had greater than 45% growth, 50 stores. And as Sabrina mentioned in her comments, we'll do at least 50 stores in 2012. So I feel really good on the franchise team, our franchisees, so that's one piece. China, I also feel very good about. 14 stores operating, 30 more stores to open in 2012. Opened in Hong Kong in November, was a -- it's been a very successful opening for us. Opened in 2 other cities, Tianjin and Hangzhou, so now we're in 5 cities in China, 5 more cities to happen. So we'll close 2012 with 10 cities, which we're going to operate, and in also feel very good. The Japanese businesses is difficult for us to gauge given the incredible disaster they faced in 3/11 last year, and we have a big business in Japan. I'll have a better sense of that coming into later in the spring and in the summer. But I like what the team is doing. I think -- I happen to know the work being done in the Gap Global Creative Center is resonating well with the Japanese team. Some of the product has not got to our customer yet, but our team likes what they're seeing. Our Banana Republic business is going to probably expand by a few stores in 2012. That's been on hold for a few years. I think that's good news, and we'll open up Old Navy Japan on July 15, just outside of Tokyo. That leaves us with Europe. And our European business, like a lot of other companies, was soft in 2011. The team there is very aware of it. We have a small business in Italy. So really, what we're talking about for us is France and the U.K. Austerity measures were tough, but we just were not good enough in 2011. The product globally at Gap women's that hurt our overall global Gap business, particularly hit our business in Europe hard, did not register at all with the customers. Again, women's product in the European markets which we operate. So too soon to tell. That's going to be a tough market. That's a wait-and-see for us. We're going to be very careful on capital, be very careful on our investments. We still believe in Europe, but we're going to be watching it quite closely the next 12 months.

And your next question is from the line of Ed Yruma.

This will be the least amount of square footage growth, or excuse me, the lowest amount of square footage declines you've had in some period of time. Is it fair to say that, at this point, you feel that your store closure program is largely complete? And if you provide a little bit of color specifically on Old Navy, I know you've been tweaking the format there and shrinking some of those stores and maybe some the performance there as well.

Ed, it's Sabrina. I'll take that. We're very much on track with the strategies we've laid out the last couple of years. So just as a reminder, the strategy around Old Navy is to downsize a lot of our stores as we remodel them into the new remodeled format, and we're making good progress there. So 2007, we had 20 million square feet. We ended this year, 2011, with 18.1 million square feet. We'll be shedding about another 400,000 square feet in '12, so we should end around 17.7. And that's really on track with what we laid out back in October to get to 17.5 in '13. With regard to Gap specialty, same, right on track. We said we wanted to get to 700 stores by 2013. We'll be closing about 85 stores in North America specialty in '12, get us down to about 750. And at the same time, important other side of the strategy is to grow the Gap outlets in North America. So we'll be opening about 20 of those. So net-net, we're right on strategy. And then we have the international stores coming up, and that's why the square footage decline isn't as great.

Your next question is from the line of Jeff Black with Citi Investment Research.

A couple of things, just a clarification, Glenn. When you say you're -- now is the time to invest in marketing, do you think a lack of marketing was in some way a hindrance to last year's comps? Are you saying you think the product is just better and could benefit from better marketing? And the question on sourcing is where are lead times, where are you in terms of using your hub strategy a little differently? And are both of these things better set this year, so a little tailwind might be turned into a significant tailwind, then we get some even lower AUC than you guys are projecting?

Jeff, on the marketing side, it's definitely the latter where the time is that -- we, as I tried to say in an earlier answer, just because we have maybe one season that sits in a showroom and it's about to be produced again to a store that, that would never get us to put marketing behind product. We've worked very hard, as we should have, given our performance in 2011. Worked really hard on the product front in getting clarity in each one of our design teams, whether that's addition of talent or was just a better focus, and part of that was the GC, the Gap Global Creative Center in New York City. And the confidence has picked up to the point where some marketing, I want to make sure I'm clear on this, some marketing will go in the Q1. The investments I'm talking about will have to be one earned and they'll have to be -- they will happen, and probably if our business performs at a higher rate through the year. So it's driven by -- if you're going to be making some changes in product and get it right on to the customer in which we need to attract to our stores, we got to go tell that story. We have a lot of marketing in the business. I want to make sure I'm clear about that. So this is a Gap story, mostly in domestic, mostly in North America. Old Navy has plenty of marketing. Their issue in 2011 was it wasn't effective, as we said a number of times on these calls, maybe being as transparent as we are. We were not happy with our marketing up until November when the new platform came out. On the sourcing, the team is just…

And your next question is from the line of John Morris with BMO Capital Markets.

I wanted to ask with respect, Glenn, to the domestic reinvestment that you're talking about, the emphasis on that -- in the 3 areas: marketing; product; and e-commerce. Will one of those be emphasized more or will it be balanced? And Sabrina, on that topic, it sounds like a lot of that would be coming from some of the recaptured savings from the lower AUC in the back half. And would you say that most of that potential differential, that delta, is going into that domestic reinvestment?

I should probably -- I'll try to handle both of those, and I'll pass it on to Sabrina for some further comments at the end. I'd say, John, it's difficult to be absolute about this because we have flexibility. Product is the one area we're going to invest in. Again, it's going to be very targeted in key categories that we can dominate in, in selective brands. That's the one with the longest lead time. So I would say that one, as I know today, will likely be the most amount of pure dollars will go into that area. But we also -- we've done some tests ahead of time, some categories, to make sure we know we can resonate with customers. It will be noticed and we'll get paid for it. But we'll be watching it through the year to make sure that those -- that, that outcome actually happens. Marketing would be the next one in line, but that has much more flexibility, much shorter lead times. And e-commerce, I talked about the new Phoenix distribution center. We got full op -- open in full operation in the fall of 2011. There's some mobile investments we're going to make. There's some investments in people that goes into that business as well, and probably the lesser of the money we're spending, as we do every year, as I said at the beginning, we're always -- we're deciding what variable SG&A we want to put in the business to deliver on the strategic plan, but also to hit the framework of the economic model the company needs to have. In terms of what percent were built, here's what they'll tell you. We're at best just finishing our fall buy right now, at best. We haven't even started anything on holiday.…

[Operator Instructions] Your next question is from the line of Richard Jaffe with Stifel, Nicolaus. Richard Ellis Jaffe - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Glenn, just a quick follow up on the sourcing change and then a question for the franchise goals longer term. First for the sourcing, obviously, that hub and spoke strategy is an old one and one that's well entrenched within the company. And the change you suggested, this category or more of a, I guess, vertical-by-product initiative. It sounds like that's going to be at least a year-long process or multiyear process to get that fully implemented. Is that correct? Or is it in place today and it's just a question of timing to get the product in stores?

What I was saying to Jeff, and I'm actually going out to all of our sourcing offices next month and I'll have a much better feeling than, Jeff, when I go out. But our teams will be in place and will be actually executing our holiday buy through that category structure we have in place. My point to Jeff was that the full benefit, the full value unlock for the company of going from design, all the way through the continuum of our product, all the way to sourcing and then our sourcing team working with a better balance of mills and vendors, that will probably -- that value unlock will probably take place more in 2013. But the team executing our product, sourcing and negotiations and vendor relations will be on a category basis starting this holiday. Richard Ellis Jaffe - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: And Glenn, will that include, 2013 that is to say, will that include taking fabric positions or commitments on fabric?

We're actually -- we do some fabric platforming today, not as much as I think we should. We have -- there's some work to be done there and the -- not only under Colin's leadership, which is a fresh set of buys but 2 senior executives that he's brought in as part of the new team he's put together. I believe all of them have been having many conversations over the last 3 months with mills, with our own in-house teams about the benefit of fabric platforming, the long term, the cost benefit, the speed benefit, which is really what I want to get because that's where the gross margin comes, if you can get fabric platforming on speed. In terms of the franchise business, we presented, it must have been 2 years ago that we planned on having 400 franchise stores by the end of 2013. We're definitely on track for that. We feel good about that goal. Stephen Sunnucks and his international team, or Stephen in particular, representing international team, will be available in October, like he is every single year, to give an update on everything international. But I suspect that he will be able to give an update on the number of stores in the franchise business at that time. Richard Ellis Jaffe - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: And does that include the southern hemisphere?

No, that's ex-Brazil, ex-India. Richard Ellis Jaffe - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: And any thoughts on that hemisphere or those countries?

No. We've had many trips to Brazil. We like the Brazilian market. The capacity there is very difficult, capacity in terms of square footage available is difficult in Brazil. I'm actually going for the sixth time to India this March. Besides the sourcing team, I'm spending time with the Indian team. So I'll get a sense of that. Those are 2 markets that, of course, we will be targeting down the road. And Steve, once again, in October, could give an update on what our thoughts are on those 2 big markets.

And your next question is from the line of Stacy Pak with Barclays Capital.

So Sabrina, my question is really for you. What does the guidance embed in terms of AUC recapture in the second half of '12? I mean, I heard what you said about you're not sure exactly what you're going to get, but what are you embedding in your guidance? I'm assuming you have some recapture in there. And if not, why not? And should we sort of assume there is? And also, what does your guidance embed in terms of share repurchases, something similar to Q4 run rate? Is that what's in there?

Yes. So I'll try and be helpful. Obviously, we put out a range, Stacy. So we do lots of scenarios. And the range that we've guided to is the best reflection of what we believe are the most probable outcomes with the info we have today. So there are a range of scenarios for both AUC. And just as a reminder, what I said was we are fairly confident we will get costing improvement in the back half. There still is uncertainty because as we said, and Glenn just reminded, we just started buying the back half. And there's lots of decisions not only the variables that are macro factors like cotton and labor and all of that, but there's also just our merchants who are making decisions about the mix of the assortment, where they'll reinvest. But all that said, we said we're fairly confident that costing will improve in the back half and our range includes scenarios with improvements. With regard to share repurchase, we also have embedded a range of share repurchases. Now I think it's important that I just underscore, again, we're trying to signal that we are absolutely committed to cash distributions as we have been for many, many years. Nothing in our principal has changed. But definitely, 2012 will be a more normalized, what we consider normalized year share repurchases. And if you look back over the last whatever, 6, 7 years, we sort of averaged $1 billion, $1.3 billion per year. And the timing, obviously, matters about the share repurchases and how accretive they are as they're back half-weighted, front half-weighted, et cetera.

Right. And just as follow-up, Sabrina, on the AUC, is part of what you've been talking about in terms of investing in the product, upgrading the fabric, is that taking away some of the AUC benefit that you would otherwise see?

Well, obviously, reinvesting means you would get less than doing exact like-for-like AUC, definitely. Now what will also be important to manage during the year is we would like to see getting paid for those investments. And that's why we're taking our time in making them very carefully and in areas that we really believe are really important to the brand. So once again, suiting is something Banana Republic stands for, and that's an area we'd look at. Similarly, denim, that's an area we stand for at Gap and that's an area we'd look at.

And your final question is from the line of Paul Lejuez with Nomura Securities.

Just to talk to that last question. As AUC comes down, how are you thinking about the AUR side of the equation and how does that differ by brand? And then, just second, can you comment on how much credit helped you this year, and if you expect that to be a tailwind or headwind in F'12?

Yes, I'll do that second question first, Paul, and then I think Glenn might chime in on the first one. With regard to the credit card, I think you guys know we've had a private label credit card for about 15 years, so a really, really long time. And then we've had a co-branded credit card we added about 5 years ago, and nothing's really changed with regard to how we report that. We've never given specific numbers, but we do embed in our 10-Qs some qualitative flavor that is helpful to our expense management. We did get a nice increase in 2011 and we wouldn't expect that same kind of increase in '11, in '12. And the reason is '11 seems to be a really unique year with balances of our customers sort of growing. I guess, that's maybe a sign that people are getting more confident as the economy improves and stabilizes, but the loss rates have stayed pretty low. I think that's fairly unique circumstances. So we're not counting on the same level of growth in the program in '12 as we got in '11.

And the relationship between AUC and AUR, as we've been speaking for a number of years on the call, we've worked hard to disaggregate those inside the business as much as possible because they really are independent decisions. They come together to formulate a gross margin rate to the senior merchant, but they should be independent decisions, AUC, AIR based on competition and what you want to do by categories. And the AUC piece is just making sure that our sourcing and production teams can get us the best cost and leverage the size of the company. I will say, Paul, that in 2011, given this unique year, particularly in the back half as we spoke about these significant increases in our cost of goods, our teams were much more aware of AUC. Those who had to price AIR, those that who had to make AUR decisions were much more aware of it. Coming in 2012, there's 2 components that are changing based on my opening comments. One, from an assortment perspective, at Old Navy in particular, we felt that we got a little bit off on the spreading of our price points under a good, better, best strategy. Got a little too far up in the best category, and that's going to be managed back to a better balance inside good, better, best. So that's one change that is certainly happening. And then our value businesses, our outlet business and in Old Navy, because of the significant increases that really impacted them in 2011 in the back half. There's a few areas we crossed thresholds with customers, and those adjustments are going to have to be made. And we're going to go back to how we operate the business in 2010, which is really making sure that merchants are 100% focused on the value proposition in the business, and then the production team getting the best cost possible, but not having the relationship be so directly affected one to the other as we did in the back half of '11 given the huge increases.

Glenn, what do you think that your competitors are going to do in terms of when they get the AUC benefit? Do you think most will reinvest in the product and the fabric as you might be doing in some cases? We heard from another retailer today, a big one, that seemed to indicate that they'd accept a slightly lower merchandise margin and really go for share. What do you think about the landscape and how everyone treats the AUC benefit?

Well, it's way too early to know and I think everybody is going to be doing different things. I'm sure there's people out there who felt that maybe they crossed some thresholds and they're going to have to make some adjustments. We watch our competitors very closely. There's going to be people who may felt during the significant pressure in the back half of '11, maybe took too much out of their product, and ours is less about going back to where it was. We try to hold our product as best as we could. Ours is just strategically trying to put in the key categories. There's going to be a group like that. I'll remind everybody this is category that's had very little inflation for the better part of 20 years. That's the first time we've seen some inflation. And the market leaders on price will be dictating a lot of this and the people who control the floor will be sending signals through everybody, whether they believe the price levels and whatever inflation was allowed to come through in 2011 should sustain itself in 2012. I think time will tell.

And Ms. O'Connell, your final question is from the line of Ike Boruchow with JPMorgan.

Just a quick question, I'm calling in for Brian. I know it's been harped on, but the SG&A, Sabrina, I mean, you guys have done such a phenomenal job the last 5 years. I don't think you've grown expenses more than 0.5%, so I don't know if you can help us with the expenses and a little more color, break out advertising versus other investments. Is it back half-weighted, front half-weighted? Just any other color would be helpful. It's something we haven't seen from you guys in a long time.

Well, I mean, I don't think that it's an enormous piece of our story going forward. So I want to make sure we're taking that into perspective. I think because of our history, you can count on us to continue to manage that very responsibly. We just also wanted to be transparent to your very point of after 5 years of really, really good management of expenses even as we were making really big investments internationally, we just want to put some investments in our domestic business as well and that's likely going to have us deleveraged. So once again, the way that will shape up, as Glenn said, our philosophy together is that we need to earn the spend. So we need to continue to see momentum. We need to feel confident we're going to get the return and so the shape of it will take form over the course of the year, but we do want to signal that it'll likely deleverage and we'll continue to manage responsibly.

I'd like to thank everyone for joining the call today. As a reminder, our earnings press release, which is available on gapinc.com, contains the full recap of our Q4 and full year results, as well as the forward-looking guidance that was included in Sabrina's remarks. And as always, the Investor Relations team will be available after the call for further questions. Thank you.

And this does conclude today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.