Dave Dullum
Analyst · Ladenburg Thalmann
Mike, thank you very much, and good morning, everyone. Generally, I'll give a very quick recap of what it is we do here at Gladstone Investment, for those of you that might be new to our stock or trying to learn. Basically, we are in the business of focusing on the buyouts of businesses that are in the United States. These are companies generally of a size range that are anywhere from above $5 million up to about $30 million in earnings. And also, the way in which we go about this is actually providing both debt and equity, when we make these investments. And the reason we do it is because this combination of the debt and equity in these individual transactions, and we'll learn more about this as we go along, produces really the assets that really give us the income that we need to distribute to our stockholders on a monthly basis, at the same time, creating the opportunity for capital gains, when we actually sell or exit these portfolio companies, which we do from time to time. So there are many other BDCs, and I'd just like to quickly highlight where we believe GAIN is different to a typical, what's called traditional credit- or debt-oriented BDC, and you might say what does that mean.
Well, when we invest in operating companies, in other words, when we make an acquisition, when we make an investment in the company, we take a significant equity position in that company. This really differs from the other public BDCs that predominantly are focused on the debt investments, and those BDCs are the ones that are referred to generally as credit-oriented BDCs.
So for example, if you look at the current portion of the equity to debt for the investments in our portfolio, you'll find that the equity portion is approximately 28% and the debt portion is approximately 72% at cost. Whereas, most of the BDCs, their portfolios are closer to about 10% of equity and more like 90% of debt. So a higher proportion of equity to debt in our portfolio. So -- and this is intentional on our part because our strategy, indeed -- and our value proposition is a bit different than most other public BDCs. In that, we choose, and would like to have the debt portion of our investments provide this income stream which allows us to pay and certainly, and over time, grow our monthly distributions.
Now that part's similar to other BDCs. However, along with the debt investment, we want this equity -- significant equity positions that we take to increase in value and, thereby, providing a further stream of income to be able to distribute to shareholders in the form of capital gains. So as we execute this strategy, these potential capital gains may then be distributed to our shareholders in the form of special distributions.
A further advantage to this approach, frankly, is that it is a provider of both the equity and the majority of the debt in any transaction in a buyout. That gives us a lot of flexibility in the way in which we can establish the term of the debt, the interest rate on the debt, and certainly gives us the ability to have significant influence over the financial structure of the company over time, if necessary. This is important to us as investors and certainly to our shareholders.
So I've touched on exits previously here, so let's talk about our exit strategies. So as our fund matures and we're now approximately 9 years into this fund, we continue with new buyouts and we should expect now some turnover in the portfolio, which is consistent with our strategy. So generally, we're going to be governed by market conditions and certainly continuing to assess the risk-reward of continuing to hold an investment versus perhaps exiting it.
So how have we done? Well, since our inception, which was in 2005, we have actually achieved 8 buyout liquidity events. This in the aggregate has generated approximately $88.4 million, a net realized gain, and approximately $19 million in other income, which has resulted in an aggregate cash on cash return on the equity portion of these investments of approximately 4x. And that's, in turn, generated a total increase to our net assets of approximately $107 million.
As previously reported, we have sold Acme Cryogenics, one of our companies, this quarter, and this was in keeping with our strategy, and it resulted in a realized gain of approximately $19 million and other income of around $2.8 million for total cash proceeds of approximately $44.6 million, which included the repayment of our $14.5 million debt investment at its par. So consistent with my previous comments, we will continue to evaluate the sale of additional companies to the extent that market conditions remain favorable and company-specific performance dictates.
Now given that we are -- we'll be reducing our income-producing asset base as we sell portfolio companies, it's obviously very important to continue to maintain the ability to provide our dividend distributions. Therefore, deal generation is very -- has a very high priority. And as a result, and for instance, we previously unannounced that we had partnered with the management in the buyout of a company called The Mountain, where we invested approximately $25.5 million in a combination of secured debt and preferred equity.
So along with that transaction, we continue to increase our presence in the marketplace and in many geographic areas of the U.S. To generate these new investment opportunities, our team primarily calls on independent sponsors, middle market investment bankers, and other sources, which will help us to create, what we consider a proprietary investment opportunity.
Now we do not depend on others to negotiate or structure our investments. Generally, the investments we make include partnering with the management teams, as in the case of The Mountain as we described, and other sponsors if there are others in the purchase of any one of one business. Our strategy of providing this financing package, including secured debt and the majority of the equity, indeed, we believe is a competitive advantage as it gives the seller, the independent sponsor, if there was one, and the management team, a very high degree of comfort that the purchase will occur at least from the financing perspective. So we believe that our strict adherence to investment fundamentals and our thorough due diligence process have enabled us to provide shareholders return in both our consistent regularly monthly distributions as well as special distributions, which we will make from time to time.
Our investment focus is generally in companies that have very strong earnings, as mentioned earlier, and operating cash flow, and certainly with an opportunity to expand those. The industry areas of interest to us are generally light and specialty manufacturing. A company in our portfolio, GI Plastek, is such an example, specialty consumer products, and services. And 2 examples of that would be: Brunswick Bowling, which we acquired last year, and The Mountain, I just mentioned; industrial products and services, companies such as Council Press and Nth Degree, which are recent acquisitions in our portfolio. And we will, from time to time, look at the aerospace and energy areas, although, we have very minimum exposure here and we'll only look at these areas very opportunistically.
Also beyond, obviously, the equity -- our secured debt investments, which we make, primarily are first-lien loans. They typically carry a cash yield that is in the mid-teens. This balances the equity portion of our investment, which helps us to produce the blended current cash yield that we need to help support our shareholder distribution expectations.
Typically, we also have, what we call success fees. These are generally additional payments made upon a change of control in any in one investment, and -- but they may be paid in cash in advance in limited circumstances at the portfolio company's option. The target in general for the equity portion of our investments is a return somewhere around 2 to 3x cash-on-cash return. As I mentioned, previously, with the exits, our cash and cash and equity has actually been closer to about 4x.
So the activity for the quarter, we report that we ended June 30, 2016, we invested about $29 million in one new deal, which was The Mountain, and some existing portfolio companies. And we successfully exited the one portfolio company Acme, which we did at a significant gain.
So what's our outlook? Well, in summary, our goal is to continue to strategically add accretive investments and position our existing portfolio for potential exits. Thus, we hope to maximize distributions to shareholders, with solid growth in both the equity and the income portion of our assets.
Now that concludes my part of the presentation. And -- today, however, you'll have to listen to me a little bit longer, as our Chief Financial Officer, Julia Ryan, is unable to be on the call today, so I am going to discuss the financial aspects of the quarter in more detail. And we have our Chief Accounting Officer, John Aronson, who is here to help as we move through this and certainly any questions later on.
So let's talk again about our originations of the new investments this quarter. With a successful exit of Acme, as I mentioned, which generated about $6.8 million in net investment income totally, we also announced that our portfolio does continue to perform well, resulting in over $20 million in net unrealized appreciation, which excludes the reversal of $21.2 million previously recorded unrealized appreciation upon the sale of Acme. The cumulative net effect of these positive trends resulted in a NAV of $9.87 per share.
Turning to the balance sheet. At the end of June, we had over $507 million in assets, which consisted of approximately $491 million in investments at fair value, about $5.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, and about $11 million in other assets. Our portfolio's approximate allocation was about $375 million in debt securities and about $147 million in equity securities or roughly 72% to 28% debt-to-equity allocation at par, as I had previously mentioned.
The liabilities and the equity at the end of the quarter consisted of $79.6 million in borrowings outstanding on our credit facility, approximately a $121.7 million in term preferred stock, about $8 million in other liabilities, and about $298 million in equity.
Our net asset value was $9.84 per share as of June 30, which is up $0.62 from the March 31 period, which primarily resulted from the net unrealized appreciation of $20 million, exclusive of reversals relating to exits this quarter. This increase was principally due to improved performance of certain portfolio companies.
And consistent with the previous 5 quarters, we continue to use an external third-party evaluation specialist, which provides additional data points regarding market comparables and other information related to certain of our more significant equity investments. We plan to continue this practice, which will help us to update the externally provided data on an annual basis for all of our significant equity investments.
Regarding the income statement. For the June quarter end, total investment income was $14.4 million versus $12.4 million in the prior quarter. Total expenses, net of credits, was approximately $7.6 million versus $7.5 million in the prior quarter, which leaves net investment income of about $6.8 million versus $4.9 million in the prior quarter. This increase in total and net investment income was primarily due to $2.8 million of dividend income, which was also received in the current quarter resulting -- as a result of the Acme transaction.
Other income was about 19% of total investment income in this current quarter, which compares to 6% in the prior quarter. Now as we've mentioned on previous calls, we expect other income, primarily composed of success fees, dividend income and so on, to remain meaningful, but will vary from quarter to quarter.
Net expenses stayed relatively flat in the current quarter, which was in line with the comparable size of the portfolio, again, quarter-over-quarter. As a result of these factors, our net investment income, NII, increased to $0.23 per common share for June from $0.16 per common share for the March quarter.
Now consistent with previous quarters, our current period net investment income, together with undistributed net investment income from the prior year, or as we term it, prior year spillover amount, more than covered our quarter distribution to shareholders of $0.1875 per common share. And our current period distribution payout ratio, which is calculated by dividing the current period distributions by the sum of that net investment income in excess of distributions and the current period distributions, was about 43%, and that compares to about 47% last quarter. So we continue to actively manage our current year with the prior year spillover amounts with the goal to maintain and over time increase our distributions to shareholders.
Now looking at the realized and unrealized changes in our assets. First off, realized gains and losses generally result from an actual sale of an investment. Unrealized depreciation and appreciation is a noncash event, and is driven by the requirement to mark our investments to the fair value on our balance sheet, with the change in fair value from one period to the next recognized in our income statement.
So for the quarter ended June 30, we recorded a net realized gain of $18.6 million, primarily related to the sale of our investment in Acme. We recorded $1 million of net unrealized depreciation in the current quarter, and this consisting of about $20 million of net appreciation of our current portfolio and $21 million of reversals of the previously recognized net appreciation related to the realized gains and exits of the investments mentioned earlier. Such reversals of previously recognized appreciation or depreciation are recorded when the realization events occur, such as exists, in the case again of Acme, or of restructures.
The net appreciation on our existing portfolio was principally due to the improved performance of certain portfolio companies. So at June 30, our entire portfolio was fair valued about 94% of cost, which compares to approximately the same amount, 94.1% of costs, last quarter. One portfolio company continues to remain on nonaccrual, which represents less than 1% of the fair value and the cost basis of our total debt investments as of June 30.
So the portfolio is made up with our debt portfolio being very well positioned for any interest rate increases we believe, with 90% of our loans having variable rates with a minimum or a floor and the remaining 10% having fixed rates. The weighted average yield on investment-bearing investments remains consistent quarter-over-quarter at about 12.7%. This strong yield does exclude previously mentioned success fees, which we have on our debt investments. Also, we do not include any paid-in-kind, or PIK, income, and we do not plan on having that in the future.
Success fees, which we've mentioned before, are worth talking about because these are yield enhancements that generally are contingent upon a change in control, such as an exit or a sale, although there are certain circumstances when the portfolio company may elect to pay it earlier. Now we only recognize these success fees on our income statement when they are earned, which generally coincides with the actual receipt of cash. So for comparison purposes, if we had accrued these success fees as we would if it was paid-in-kind, or PIK, interest like other BDCs -- some BDCs do, our weighted average yield on interest-bearing assets would approximate 15% during the quarter versus the reported 12.7%. Now as of June 30, 2016, these success fees are, as we mentioned, we accrue them off-balance sheet, they totaled approximately $30 million or almost $1 per common share. Now there is no guarantee that we will be able to collect any or all of these over time or actually have any real control over the timing of their collection.
From a credit priority standpoint, a 100% of our loans are secured, with 79% having a first-lien priority and the remaining 21% having a second-lien priority in the capital structure of the respective portfolio companies, and this is at cost.
So overall, Gladstone Investment had, we believe, a very good quarter, both in terms of investment activity and have, therefore, started 2017 in a very good position with -- first, again, the exit of Acme and the closing of a new investment in The Mountain. We've maintained our distribution rate while still remaining committed to covering our distributions by current or prior year net investment spillover income, as we have done consistently over the last 4 fiscal years. So now I will turn it over to David Gladstone.