Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Freshworks' First Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there'll be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Joon Huh, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon and welcome to Freshworks' first quarter 2023 earnings conference call. Joining me today are Girish Mathrubootham, Freshworks' Chief Executive Officer; Dennis Woodside, Freshworks' President; and Tyler Sloat, Freshworks' Chief Financial Officer. The primary purpose of today's call is to provide you with information regarding our first quarter 2023 performance and our financial outlook for our second quarter and full year 2023. Some of our discussion and responses to your questions may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on Freshworks' current expectations and estimates about its business and industry, including our financial outlook, macroeconomic uncertainties, management's beliefs and certain other assumptions made by the company, all of which are subject to change, such risks include but are not limited to our ability to sustain our growth, to innovate, to meet customer demand and to control costs and improve operating efficiency. These statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. For a discussion of material risks and other important factors that could affect our results, please refer to today's earnings release, our most recently filed Form 10-K and our other periodic filings with the SEC. Freshworks assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this call, except as required by law. During the course of today's call, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures, reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures are included in our earnings release, which is available on our Investor Relations website at ir.freshworks.com. I encourage you to visit our Investor Relations site to access our earnings release, supplemental earnings slides, periodic SEC reports, a replay of today's call or to learn more about Freshworks. And with that, let me turn it over to Girish.

Thank you, Joon, and welcome everyone. Thank you for joining us today on Freshworks' earnings call covering our first quarter of 2023. We started the year off strong, achieving our first quarter of non-GAAP operating profit as a public company. We exceeded our expectations for Q1 with revenue coming in above the high end of our financial outlook range at $137.7 million and we outperformed our estimates for free cash flow with $9.1 million in Q1, as we grow meaningful efficiencies in our business. In today's environment, as businesses are seeking efficiencies in their software spend and picking faster time to value, I'm excited to see the Freshworks' value proposition resonate even better with larger companies. Before diving into our business drivers, I should note that starting this quarter, we are providing supplemental slides of some of our financial results. These slides can be found on our Investor Relations website and we hope you find them to be useful. During these uncertain economic times, we are committed to sustaining growth through four key strategies that I outlined last quarter. First, our focus on product innovation continues to allow us to meet customer demand for efficiency by streamlining IT processes, enhancing omnichannel customer experiences, and launching an AI-powered Freshmarketer beta program. Second, we are experiencing strong growth from mid-market and enterprise customers, which Dennis will discuss further after this. Third, our focus on expansion and helping our customers adopt more of our solutions continues and Dennis will elaborate on this. Finally, we are dedicated to improving our operating efficiency. As I mentioned, we delivered our first quarter of operating profit on a non-GAAP basis since becoming a public company. Tyler will cover this in more detail later. Beginning with our latest product innovation, this quarter our teams launched enhancements in our…

Thank you, G, and thanks to all of you for joining us. We're really pleased with our first quarter performance as we once again beat our financial estimates for revenue and improved our operating efficiency to achieve our first quarter of non-GAAP operating profit as a public company. We surpassed our targets by focusing on new business growth, especially with larger customers, expanding with our existing customers and making strategic investments and enhancements in our field and go-to-market teams. This focus drove continued multiproduct adoption, higher participation in competitive deals, and more new business opportunities for both CX and IT. Our ability to build software at a lower cost allows us to deliver a low total cost of ownership and thus offer a higher return on investment to the customer. In Q1, our products continued to show they can scale to support thousands of mid-market and enterprise customers. These customers need a sophisticated level of support, but are hungry for simpler implementation than some of our biggest competitors provide. Looking at our large customer cohort, which we define as customers spending more than $50,000 in ARR, it grew 30% year-over-year to 2013 customers in Q1 or 33% in constant currency. These customers, which represent 45% of our business are choosing Freshworks over larger established players and legacy on-prem solutions. It's incredible to see how very different companies are finding rapid impact and lasting value with Freshworks. A large company like S&P Global needed a support team to respond to customer queries as quickly as the market changes. S&P mines billions of data points to offer independent ratings, benchmarks, and analytics. It then offers critical information to companies, governments and individuals to make investment decisions. S&P uses Freshdesk to automate route and assign tickets to agents, who can resolve issues fast…

Thanks, Dennis. And thanks again to everyone for joining us. As you've heard from our earlier commentary, Q1 was a great quarter of execution. We beat our estimates for revenue and more significantly, we improved our operating margins to position the business for sustainable and profitable growth in the years ahead. I'm pleased with our ability to adjust our operating model to meet the realities of the current market environment and generate a meaningful level of outperformance in the quarter. For our call today, I'll cover the Q1 financial results, provide background on the key metrics, and close with our forward-looking commentary and expectations for Q2 and the full year 2023. Similar to prior quarters, I'll include constant currency comparisons for certain metrics to provide a better view of our business trends. As a reminder, most of our discussion will be focused on non-GAAP financial results, which exclude the impact of stock-based compensation expenses, payroll taxes on employee stock transactions, amortization of acquired intangibles and other adjustments. Starting with the income statement. Revenue grew 23% year-over-year on a constant currency basis or 20% as reported to $137.7 million. Currency rates for the dollar against the euro and pound were relatively stable in Q1. So the different growth rates represent the trailing negative impact to revenue from FX movements mainly from prior quarters. Despite a tighter spending environment from companies, we continue to see momentum in new deal activity for our ITSM product Freshservice in the field. Our larger deals over $50,000 in ARR were once again the fastest growing segment for new business in the quarter. Expansion activity for the quarter performed roughly in line with our expectations, as agent additions continue to be affected by a slower growth environment. In terms of churn, we achieved a slightly better churn…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Elizabeth Porter from Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. Ryan Bressner on for Elizabeth. I'm just thinking about the results for the quarter, they are fairly strong even despite the difficult macro. I'm just kind of curious what you're seeing around the consolidation theme in the market, are you seeing more customers consolidate their platforms onto your systems or what's driving some of the factors seeing here.

Hi, Ryan. This is Girish. I'll take that. Overall, I would say there is no significant change compared to the previous quarters. Clearly, we are seeing customers scrutinizing their spend like if I can speak from Freshworks experience, we looked at all the software that we bought and used and I think every company is going through that and seeing if they could get stuff done with fewer vendors. So that could be something of that and we have several anecdotal customer examples, where we kind of replaced two or three tools, but that has been our play in general, so I wouldn't call out anything specific to this quarter. But overall, business is looking to seek more value and we are benefiting from that.

Thanks. That's helpful. Maybe with the recent banking crisis in mind, I was curious if you've seen any difference in customer performance by vertical or maybe even region with the US underperforming or outperforming Europe and APAC.

I think we not yes. Sorry. This is Dennis. Just wanted to ask that one. We didn't see any appreciable difference in performance by region. We continue to see the similar trends to what we saw last quarter with SMB being a little bit weaker and our mid-market business being quite good. And you see that in our numbers in terms of the number of customers that are over 50,000 continuing to grow at strong rates.

All right. Thanks for the question.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Brent Thill of Jefferies. Your line is now open.

Thanks. Tyler, just in terms of what you're embedding in the guide, can you just give us a sense of worsening environment, stable, better, how are you embedding for the year in terms of guide? What are the underlying assumptions here?

Hi, Brent. So, there's a couple of things. One, we do expect to see some continued pressure on the expansion motion. In Q1, churn actually came in better than we expected. We had talked at the end of Q4 that we expected to see a little bit of pressure on churn. We do think that's going to happen a little bit in Q2, we talked about net dollar retention going down a 105 from where it was in Q1, which is a little bit better than what we thought - want. But we think it's kind of, we expect it to kind of plateau at that point in terms of the guide for Q2 on revenue and then on billings, which we expect to kind of match revenue at around 17%. We're really just trying to call as we see it. We don't have as much visibility as a large enterprise software company of our sales cycles and so we are just trying to be as transparent as possible from that perspective. I do think there's some really good things going on in new business growth. And we are still expanding with our customers, but as agent addition is our biggest form of expansion still that has slowed down and we've been talking about that for almost a year now. On the efficiency side, we're going to continue to drive efficiencies, we were able to raise considerably on the operating profit and on cash and we're going to plan to execute against that for the rest of the year.

And to Dennis' comments about SMB weaker, was that weaker than last quarter or is that just kind of the same weakness, you haven't seen a drop anymore kind of the thing?

No. No change. No change from last quarter.

Okay. And then just one quick follow-up for Girish on AI. When you think about embedding ChatGPT, how long does this take to actually get embedded, when can customers start to appreciate the differences in the products, is this a couple of quarters out, is this going to take a year? How long does it take to hit production - point where you'd like to see - see it have full scale adoption?

So Brent, we've had AI before ChatGPT also in terms of our Freddy offerings in terms of what we already have live, some of the stuff that we all saw in terms of helping our users get better content, summarizing content and all of that stuff, the open AI based ChatGPT stuff, a lot of it is already out, but where we are excited and actually investing right now, which is a priority for us, like in this quarter and the coming quarters is how do we actually use generative AI to think about improving our ability to help businesses deliver better customer experiences and better employee experiences, so we are thinking along the lines of how can generative AI help customers self-serve themselves, how can it help customer service agents solve customer problems or leaders actually get better insight and we're doing this across not just our CX products, but also across our IT and sales and marketing products. So we have a list of announcements coming up in our June product launch event, we will share more in that. So hope you can join us.

Thank you.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Pinjalim Bora of JPMorgan. Your line is now open.

Okay, great. Hi guys, congrats on the quarter. Great to see the operating leverage. Maybe help us understand where are we in terms of just completing some of these efficiency levers that you're pulling, how much of the low-hanging fruit still remains and I heard there were some exits, I think you said on the sales side, how are you thinking about kind of sales capacity going forward?

Hi Pinjalim, this is Tyler. Yes. We've made some changes coming into the year, but a lot of it, there's - a lot of that go to market changes. We started doing at the end of Q4 and it kind of went into effect at the beginning of January. And then the other changes that I alluded to were really kind of a threefold, one really focusing on performance-based culture, which did result in some exits, really looking at hiring and being very focused on making sure we have the right people in the right places. And then, three, there's still employee attrition, although employee attrition has gone down. As a result, we did end the quarter with slightly lower headcount than we had entering the quarter. But the efficiency exercises are going to continue, right. I think that we have the advantage that number one, we have been hiring really rapidly up through kind of the beginning of second quarter last year and we really started to slow that down. Two, it's kind of just one of the competitive advantages that we have with a lot of our functions really being run out of India and the DNA of the company has always been kind of about being efficient. And that we're just getting back to that and making sure we're trying to drive that efficiency. In terms of the sales side, we feel that we are structured now, we have this one quarter or some of the changes and the capacity is there, we are still hiring reps, where we feel that we need to build capacity out and we're still going to continue to tweak things to make sure we can get as much return as possible for those dollars that were thrown into the go-to-market motion.

Yes, understood. Okay. Thank you for that. And one for Girish, obviously you're starting to add a lot of the AI capabilities that we have with open AI and ChatGPT and all that stuff. I wanted to ask more of a high-level question of introduction of AI and driving efficiency will - potentially could have pressure on seats. So I'm thinking how are you kind of balancing the potential to capture incremental value from these efficiencies versus any potential pressure on seats that you might see in the future?

Yes. Pinjalim, this is a journey that is not new but definitely, the question is being asked louder after ChatGPT. But in 2016, we embarked on this journey where we foresaw a future where the industry is moving more towards bots and automation. And I think the reality of, let's say, our biggest market, which is customer service and support. The reality is level one support always will have a lot of deflection and automation. And the higher order support will actually always require some amount of human touch personalization and subject matter expertise. So I think we are just seeing more and more automation if and when that it's possible, so we already have bots as part of our Freddy offering, where we charge for that not like based on the number of bot sessions used or based as the number of interactions. And we also have a primary agent-based model. So I think both will exist. The more automation will drive, so we will add more value to customers and be able to charge more for the bot-based formation.

Understood. Thank you very much.

[Operator Instructions] The question comes from the line of Adam Bergere of Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. Just sounds like solid traction as you move up market, you've cited some pretty big customers such as the S&P or Forbes. I guess might actually consider just full-on enterprises, so I wanted to know where do you draw the line in terms of large customers you actively target in an outbound manner versus some, who are large and you kind of get pulled into those deals. Thank you.

Yes. Thanks, Adam. This is Dennis. So our ideal customer profile today is up - about up to 5,000-employee company, although we do stretch up into 10,000 and in some cases bigger than that. We handle all companies coming in and this is new this year of up to 500 employees through our inbound motion, and that's primarily served out of India. So it's a rather low-cost motion, more product led growth and then companies that are over 500 employees are handled by our field teams. And you're correct, we have had some good progress in moving up market, one of the big changes we made this year is focusing our field sales teams on winning bigger deals and splitting our hunting motion from our farming or account management motion. So we have sellers whose job is 100% focused on acquiring new business and sellers whose job is 100% on upsell. We see early signs that that's working and I think, again, you see it in some of the numbers and some of the - some of the bigger logos and all of these deals are competitive. We're going up against the big cloud players as well as legacy incumbents and we're winning based on a combination of having a feature-complete product and having really strong value. So, it's still early, but good progress.

Okay. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brent Bracelin of Piper Sandler. Your line is now open, Brent.

Good afternoon. Great to see balancing of profitable growth, positive free cash flow here, obviously part of the path to profitable growth has been your own internal look at vendor consolidation. Dennis, for you, as you just think about this vendor consolidation theme, we entered the year with our CEO survey saying that that there was definitely an appetite for companies to reduce the number of vendors, how is that progressing. We're four months in, is there a narrative out there, was it - is really resonating with the customers you're talking to that are lower cost, consumer friendly platform is helping or is that something maybe that could show up in the second half of the year. Any color on vendor consolidation at the tail-end of the business.

Yes. Definitely. So, we do see in particular in our Freshdesk business, we see consolidation as playing in our favor. So if you look at - if you look at a typical service operation today, there are multiple different functions that software plays that could be provided by different players in some cases have been in the past, you can buy your bots from one provider, you can buy your second - tier ticketing system from a different one and you can buy a conversational layer from a whole bunch of smaller players. We've built a best-in-class solution that encompasses all of those things in an integrated way without acquiring any of them, so the code base is clean, the user experience is really slick and we're winning quite a bit of business in rip-outs of companies that have chosen a more fragmented approach in the past. So we think consolidation and value is a theme that we're pursuing. It's also much easier for the customer on an ongoing basis to manage us rather than having to manage three or four different solutions, all the integration that goes with that. So that's the winning motion for us and we think that will play out positively.

So clearly seeing it in Freshdesk, are you seeing it across platform consolidation years Freshdesk.

Yes. Yes. We're starting to. So if you, one of the examples was Travel Counsellors today. Travel Counsellors was a - or is a Freshdesk customer. They added Freshsales and that's more and more common for us, where we're seeing customers that have been with us for a couple of years, they've had success with the product and then they're adding a second product or third product, again it's still relatively early for us, most of our expansion has historically come from seed addition of the same product, but we're leaning more and more into the true cross sell motion like the Travel Counsellors for example.

Thank you. One moment for our next question, which comes from the line of Alex Zukin of Wolfe Research. Your line is now open.

Hi guys, this is Ethan on for Alex Zukin. Thanks for taking our question. Just one thing, it looks like the revenue from new customers - seeing like a continued step down and I guess it's understandable considering the environment is, but can you just help us think around how we take that you got the 105 and stabilize to each. How does the things that like linearity, are we kind of seeing that in the demand environment going forward kind of parse out with your commentary around the bottom to ARR. Thank you.

Okay. Hi, you broke up a little bit, but I think you're asking about the number of customers and then net dollar retention. We are typically closing about 1,600 to 2,000 customers per quarter and we came in at 1,500. There's some noise on the F&B on the small side, but the new logos were actually SMB on the small side in terms of churn. But the new logos are actually pretty healthy and the offset from a continued increase in our ARPU. So there's nothing there that we were concerned about really. In terms of net dollar retention, we came a little bit higher than what we thought and we thought we had a really good quarter of execution there. We're still expanding with customers, but we're continuing to see the pressure on the upsell motion or the expansion motion on agent addition. We're finding other ways to start expanding with - with our customers and we talked about Freshservice for teams as an example, which is the first real add-on for Freshservice net, this is the first quarter that was available. But one of the reasons we did better is churn actually came in better for the quarter from a dollar perspective, which is a little bit different than what I said from a customer number perspective. We do expect to see a little bit of pressure on churn going forward, but also continued to see pressure on the expansion motion. That's why we're talking about a 105 - but we do think it's going to kind of - kind of get settled at that, as we look at the back half of the year and obviously, we'll update that as we get more information in the coming quarter.

Thank you. One moment for our next question, which comes from the line of Brian Peterson of Raymond James. Your line is now open.

Hi, Tyler. Thanks for taking the questions. So I just want to follow up on the last one, just on the ARR. Is there anything that you guys have seen in April that's changed, I appreciate all the perspective that you gave, but in terms of that expansion motion, has that changed, I guess so far in April versus what you saw in March and is there any element to that you guys are just landing bigger, so maybe there is kind of less of an initial ARR push and that's a factor as well, just want to unpack that a bit. Thank you.

Yes, I mean, no real change in April, I mean we've obviously guided today for the quarter. And we've taken everything into account that we know and so everything is kind of as expected. And so there's no real change there in terms of expansion or churn that's different than what we were expecting coming into the month. In terms of are we landing more, I would say the sales pattern we are landing with larger customer, right. And we've been talking about how we've been moving up and we're not - we're not talking about huge companies, Dennis just went through the size of companies that we're talking about. But the landing - if I look at the deals, it doesn't feel like we have any difference in land in terms of, I think you're alluding to hi, it's it possible like shelfware and that people are growing into what they're buying. And that typically isn't really the sales motion most of the customers still kind of buy what they need, it's just that I think that the companies are not hiring as fast as they have been in the past. And then, on the flip side, on the churn side, we have seen down-sells, which is included in churn, as companies come up for renewal, if they've laid off people. And so that's just really a macro thing, something we didn't expect kind of coming into last year and we've been able to adjust the business model accordingly. But I do think that will change and people companies will go back to growing and then we will both be able to participate in that.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. Questions comes from the line of Aaron Kimson of JMP Securities. Your line is now open.

Okay, great. Thank you. It's actually Pat for Aaron. I was going to ask Dennis, the - in terms of the opportunity that you saw here when you took this job, what levers have you pulled so far, I mean the hunter farmer one seems to be one and what do you still have that you can do in the future.

Hi Pat, thanks for the question, so I think we started - we've really just gotten started on a number of things. I think one of the themes that I talked about pretty consistently is the opportunity we have to serve true mid-market customers. And that's really still quite untapped. So Paddy has done an amazing job of laying the groundwork, making sure we've got the right people focused on the right kinds of deals, making sure our field team is winning big deals and anything that's not over a certain threshold is going to our low-cost inbound motion. And that's just - that's still early days. I think some of the hiring that we've done is going to pay off over the course of the year. We brought in a new head of channel, we brought in a new Head of strategy and ops, who was previously at AWS for 8 years. So those hires are going to start having impact. I think an area that's really untapped for us is channel, the more I talk to partners and hear what they're hearing in terms of our competitor set and some of the pricing practices that some of our competitors are pulling, they're looking for alternatives in both the CX and IT space and in the sales and marketer space. I think that's a big lever for us, I think you're going to see, I think the effect of the changes that Paddy has made in the back half of this year in terms of getting the right kinds of reps, doing the right kinds of things and then we haven't pulled the lever really on true cross sell, right. We have an expansion motion that's heavily seat addition driven, but we have the opportunity to do a much better job in selling our IT products into our large installed CX base and vice versa and then bringing in sales and marketer at the right time. So all those things I think are still ahead of us and then you layer on top of that some of the advancements that we're making in AI and the productivity improvements that they will drive for our customers and their agents and managers, all those things are pretty exciting.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. The question comes from the line of DJ Haynes of Canaccord. Your line is now open.

Hi, this is Luke on for DJ, Thanks for taking the question. So taking a bit of a longer-term view here, but I'm curious if you think we could gradually see a significant structural improvement in net dollar retention over time, as you continue to really push up market and push that cross-sell motion or in your view is it perhaps a more subtle shift than that?

Hi Luke, so I think - I think a couple of things will happen on net dollar retention. Coming into last year, we were kind of mid-teens and a lot of that was not a lot of - a big portion of that was driven by that agent addition, which has really decreased. At the same time though, we had brought - we went public, we were low 20s churn and we've talked about hey, we've moved that to kind of high teens and we're going to continue to make progress on that. In fact, now we're kind of like mid to high teens on churn rate, so I think over time we're going to do, I think three things. One, continue to work on churn and get that to kind of, as well as we can, that's kind of a slow-moving thing, but as we move to the servicing larger companies as Freshservice continues to grow to be our fastest growing product, which has great churn characteristics and as we continue to provide value through our products, we expect the churn to come down. Secondarily, we are working on other ways to grow with our customers outside of agent addition and Freshservice for teams is a great example of that and the cross-sell motion across products, which Dennis just talked about is another great example of that. That's going to essentially help with expansion outside of that. And then third, as we come out of macro, we would expect companies to start hiring again. And then the agent addition will kick back in. If you look at all of that, there is no - we don't think there's any reason we can't get back to that kind of 110 to 115 rate on net dollar retention, as those things happen, which you know is an extra 10 points of growth for us, just from expansion with our own customers. So we're optimistic about that. We just kind of need to weather this macro storm through the rest of this year.

Thank you. One moment please. Our next question comes from the line of Ryan MacWilliams of Barclays. Your line is now open.

Thanks. Two questions. Tyler, now that you're non-GAAP profitable and given your net debt position, any changes to how you're thinking about the potential for share repurchases here. And then for Dennis, you may have alluded to this in your prepared remarks, but some of your competitors have raised prices in recent quarters, I know Freshworks offers the cost-effective sale for its customers, but do you have any new thoughts on potentially raising prices across different products, tiers or geography. Thanks guys.

Okay, I'll take the first piece first, Ryan. So we're about year-and-a-half into being public here. We kind of say, it's got a three-step process, get to sustainable free cash flow positive, then get to sustainable non-GAAP operating profit and then third GAAP operating profit. Yes, I think we've done the first, the second, we're just in the first step of doing and then once we're really confident there, then we would look at our cash, obviously we're very healthy and we still have $1.1 billion in the bank and we have no debt and we're going to start producing cash. We are using that cash right now, part of it to do net settle of RSUs, well over $100 million last year to do that, I think we used about $17 million last quarter. And that is kind of a form of buyback, if you look at it that way because those shares will never hit the market and then the broader point of what we do with our cash if it's not used for operations, is clearly a Board discussion that we would have with them at some point in time.

Yes. On pricing, I think we do have leverage. We've - we took prices up for ITSM in January for new customers and renewals by about 4%. And we didn't really see much in the way of pushback - first of all, the price umbrella between us and either like BMC product or ServiceNow is quite big. And secondly, that our customers are getting a lot of value out of - out of the solution. So there potentially is more there. The other area that we're looking at is at renewal, we - when we're coming up to renewal historically, we've had a number of customers that are on fairly discounted deals, we're revisiting those discounts as part of the renewal discussion and we're able to effectively raise price at renewal as well. So I think there are more and more levers. We are getting more sophisticated about how we're thinking about pricing and that's another area that I'm certainly digging into.

Thank you. One moment. Our next question comes from the line of Nick Altmann of Scotiabank. Your line is now open.

Awesome. Thanks guys. You guys over the past several quarters have talked about how ITSM Freshservice has been a strong area in an area that you guys are leaning into, when you look at sort of the bookings this quarter, can you just maybe talk about the booking strength between Freshservice, Freshdesk, Freshsales etc. And then just as a follow-up, do you think ITSM is maybe holding up a bit stronger, budgets are a little bit more insulated there and it's a bit more upmarket or do you think it's sort of a front-office versus middle-office versus back-office dynamic and maybe buying propensity is little bit better and ITSM versus other areas, any commentary around those aspects would be very helpful, thanks?

Hi Nick, this is Tyler. So in terms of the bookings by product, we haven't really broken that out and we do plan on our Investor Day to get more kind of product ARR information, but what we have said is that ITSM has been the fastest growers, the biggest contributor to ARR growth and that continued in Q1. The product is doing great, and we also called out that is actually a really good kind of new business quarter there. Now you asked is there more budget. I think it is interesting that I don't necessarily think that ITSM has more budget. In fact, on the smaller companies, what we would see is that those customers would wait in times like this and they kind of stay with just email and whatnot for their ITSM and so I think that's a future opportunity for us, as companies get a little bit more budget that they would look to us to buy. I actually look at it more as the opportunity in a market of our product and the value that that product can provide. And then also be in a great value for existing ServiceNow customers, who are tired of that product that we can provide an incredible alternative and that's what we've been leaning into and that we're going to continue to do that and also specifically with the legacy vendors there. And so it is a great space and we're going to continue to go capture as much as possible.

Yes. Nick, one other thing - this is Dennis, I'd call out is the investment that we've made over the last several years in product - the IT product in particular is absolutely critical in winning deals. So think about ITOM capability that we didn't have a year ago or an ESM solution that works for teams outside of IT that we didn't have a year ago. These are really important developments for us that allow us to address a broader range of customers. And that's showing up in the numbers.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brett Knoblauch from Cantor Fitzgerald. Your line is now open, Brett.

Hi guys, congrats on the quarter and thanks for taking my question. You talked about being more involved in more deal opportunities. I guess, is this a trend that you have seen accelerate given some budgetary pressures you're seeing with some larger enterprises.

Hi Brett, it's Dennis. So yes, we are - one of the things we look at is how many swings with the bat do we get per quarter, and once again, Q1 was greater than Q4 and Q4 and the year historically a pretty good time of year to get that kind of volume. So we're in the mix more - we're in larger situations, so we're swinging at fatter pitches, so to speak. So the deals that we are getting involved in on average are bigger than they have been in the past. And I think that's back to the product innovation, both for CX and for IT that goes to all the investments that we've made conversational and automation on the CX side and in ITOM and ESM and other features on the ITSM side. So it's a really important metric for us. It demonstrates the network that we're building in terms of referrals and customers that are happy and talking to other customers all that stuff comes together, and looking at how much are we participating in new opportunities, of course, how many of those we're winning. So we think it's - we think it's an important trend and I do think in talking to customers, they are looking for value and in many cases, they're not satisfied with whatever solution they have, whether that's an old on-prem solution or newer cloud solution.

Okay. Thanks guys, I appreciate it.

Okay. Thank you. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back to the company for closing remarks.

Great. Hi, thanks for everybody joining us. We look forward to meeting with you and speaking with you throughout the quarter and we'll catch-up with you next quarter. Thank you.

Thank you all for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program and you may now disconnect.