Patrick Ryan
Analyst · Piper Sandler. Please go ahead
Thank you, Steve. I’d Just like to give a brief overview of the structure for today’s call. We’re going to start within a bridge version of discussion and summary of the first quarter results. Steve and I will walk through some prepared remarks we have specifically related to the first quarter. And then we also sent out as part of our press release, a presentation with some important updates related to COVID-19. And so after we’re done with the discussion of first quarter, the group will walk through the slides that went out as part of that press release. And at the end of the slide presentation, we will open it up for questions. So to start with the first part regarding the first quarter results, I would say, absent the significant increase in the provision and the allowance from a core operating standpoint, I think, it was a pretty decent quarter. We did see some margin compression reemerge in March as a result of the actions that the Fed took during the first quarter. And as I’m sure, you noticed, our provision in the quarter was significantly above almost three times above kind of our average quarterly provision in 2019. And it’s important to note and you may have seen that the credit metrics actually improved during the quarter. And so you can certainly tell that the increase in the provision and the allowance was related to qualitative factors in our allowance model related to what we’re all seeing in terms of deteriorating economic statistics. And we thought it was imprudent to put additional emphasis on those qualitative factors in this first quarter allowance calculation. Regarding the specific credit quality metrics at the end of the first quarter, nonperforming loans were down to 0.79%, compared to 1.32% at year-end, and nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets were down to 0.72%, compared to 1.20%. at year-end. We did see some nice loan growth in the quarter, as well as some very strong deposit growth, largely driven by commercial deposit acquisition. Our loan deposit ratio came down closer to 101, 102, and the deposit growth, as I mentioned, came from commercial categories. We did lower deposit rates twice during the quarter, which helped to offset some of the impact of the lower loan and the asset yields that resulted from a repricing of our floating rate assets on our balance sheet. Our cost of interest-bearing deposits declined 12 basis points from 1.68% to 1.56% and our net interest margin held in pretty well with a 4 basis point decline from 3.34% to 3.30%. Commercial deposits increased as a percentage of our total deposits from 27% at the end of 2019, up to 33% at the end of the first quarter. Our ancillary income sources were down a little bit compared to Q4, but Q4 was a particularly high quarter. In terms of our actual sources of ancillary income, prepayment penalty income was $464,000 in the quarter, which was a fair bit above the quarterly average from last year of $214,000. Loan swap fee income was $234,000 in the quarter, compared to an average of $114 per quarter in 2019. Gains on sale of SBA loans were $79,000 during the first quarter, which was just a little bit above the average from last year of $57,000 per quarter, and the gains on recovery of acquired loans were $181,000 in the quarter, compared to last year’s quarterly average of $194,000. So you can see, all in all, our ancillary income sources held up well during Q1. Quarterly expenses came in a little bit higher than we had originally anticipated. If you recall, in our last earnings call, we had laid out an estimate of $9.6 million to $9.7 million in quarterly non-interest expense. Our quarterly non-interest expense in this quarter was $9.9 million, which is obviously a little bit higher. I think it’s important to note that, that 10% – the non-interest expenses were up 10% year-over-year when you compare first quarter of 2020 to the first quarter of 2019. But that 10% growth is actually lower than our revenue growth during the same time period of 16%. The expense items that came in a little higher in the first quarter were legal fees, insurance and OREO. We have several action items under consideration that will allow us to contain expenses going forward. The trajectory and timing of the recovery from COVID-19 will dictate how far we need to go with these cost-cutting plans. Looking forward to the remainder of 2020, I think, it’s fair to say that previous guidance is on hold or off the table at this point, very hard to predict what we – what we’ll see from a loan growth perspective. Certainly, in the short run, we’ll see a temporary blip or increase related to SBA PPP loans. But if you take that out of the discussion, I think, it really is a difficult market to predict. I think, as you look at the overall market for lending, there’ll be – I suspect there’ll be lower demand overall, as well as more stringent underwriting from banks across the Board, which I suspect would lead to lower overall loan growth. Although there are some new opportunities emerging, and I think community banks in particular that we’re able to successfully navigate round one of the PPP process, I know we have and I suspect other community banks have had a number of conversations with unhappy commercial customers that were not able to get PPP loans in round one from their primary bank. And I suspect that some of the potential weakness in loan demand could be offset by some market share gain opportunities for not only for us, but for community banks across the Board. Again, talking about looking forward in 2020, I suspect we should be able to continue to drive down deposit costs. We remain liability-sensitive and we continue to look for opportunities to lower our funding costs. Our commercial deposit pipeline remains very active. We’ve been able to successfully continue to convert new commercial customers, despite the fact that the lion’s share of our back office is now working from home, working remotely. And we suspect that, we’ll be able to continue to convert and bring over new commercial customers during the remainder of 2020. And as I mentioned before, we believe there are opportunities for additional expense management. Before I turn it over to Steve, I just wanted to hit a couple of other observations and highlights. First of all, I’d like to commend our team on the lending side that did an amazing job dealing with really huge volume of PPP loans, as you may have seen from our press release, a bank that historically did five or six SBA loans a year was able to get 577 processed, closed and funded. And the estimated processing fee income from round one is about $4.7 million. We were able to get over 90% of the applications we received approved, not only internally, but approved by the SBA. And as of yesterday, all of those loans had been closed and funded. I think this is important for a number of reasons, not just the potential short-term fee income opportunity, but perhaps more importantly, this will create some great long-term benefits for us moving forward. Specifically, we’ve reinforced the goodwill with our existing customers. I think, it will also prove to be a huge opportunity to attract and bring in small and medium-sized businesses locally that were very unhappy with the way the process played out for them. And I think, fundamentally, what we’re seeing is a reinforcement of the community bank value proposition. We’re having a real relationship with your banker is not something that is a nice to have, it’s a need to have. And I think a lot of business owners are getting reeducated on that importance. And I believe this could become a bit of a game-changing moment, given the number of quality conversations with new commercial prospects that we’ve had over the last several weeks. We have more detailed information regarding our response to COVID-19, which we will share in the presentation shortly after we finish the review of the first quarter results. At this point, I’d like to turn it over to our CFO, Steve Carman, to get into a little more detail regarding those results in Q1. Steve?