David Robson
Analyst · ROTH Capital. Your line is now open
Thanks, Mike. I'll now go into further detail regarding our results for the second quarter. Beginning with coffee volumes, green coffee processed and sold in the quarter decreased by 1.7 million pounds or 5.8% to 27.4 million pounds compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2018. The decline was driven largely by lower volume from two of our top customers, as well as the impact of two brands that we serviced in the prior year that were brought in-house by the owner of those brands. In addition to softness in our DSD channel, the mix of coffee volumes processed and sold during the quarter was approximately 9.9 million pounds or 36% of the total volume through our DSD network. Direct ship customers represented approximately 17 million pounds of green coffee processed and sold or 62.2% of the total volume and 0.5 million pounds or 1.8% of the total volume was through distributors. Turning next to the income statement, net sales for the quarter were $159.8 million, a decrease of $7.6 million or 4.5% from $167.4 million reported in the same period of the prior year. The decline was driven by lower volume in our direct ship business that I mentioned a moment ago, the impact of lower coffee prices for our cost plus customers, a reduction in industrial soup base revenues associated with the Boyd's acquisition, which we stopped selling in the first quarter of the current fiscal year, and a decline in revenue sold through our DSD network. Gross profit in the second quarter of fiscal 2019 decreased by $3 million or 5.4% to $53.2 million from $56.3 million and gross margin decreased 30 basis points to 33.3% from 33.6% in the prior year period. The decrease in gross margin rate was primarily due to higher freight expense of 75 basis points, higher coffee green equipment costs associated with increased installation activity during the quarter of 107 basis points, and higher production cost of 70 basis points, offset by higher product margins, driven by lower coffee prices and increased product pricing within our DSD network. Turning to operating expenses, operating expenses for the quarter decreased to $52.7 million or 33% of net sales as compared to $56.3 million or 33.6% of net sales recorded in the second quarter of the prior year. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily due to a $2.5 million decrease in selling expenses associated with headcount reductions and other efficiencies from DSD route optimization and a $2.2 million decrease in G&A expenses associated with synergies achieved through the Boyd's acquisition at the end of the transition service arrangements with Boyd's at the beginning of October, offset by higher acquisition and integration costs and bad debt expense. During the quarter, we experienced elevated past due receivables balances across some direct ship and DSD customers, and we increased the allowance for doubtful accounts accordingly. The decrease in operating expenses was also offset by an increase in net losses from the sale of other assets of $0.9 million and a reduction in gains from sale of spice assets of $0.3 million. The losses on asset sales primarily relates to assets we acquired from Boyd's, some of which we sold and disposed of when we exited the Boyd's facility in December. As we look to the back half of the year, we expect our operating leverage to continue to improve, now that Boyd's coffee production is fully integrated into our production facilities and we can more fully realize synergies related to the integration. We also expect to realize year-over-year cost savings resulting from our route and branch optimization efforts that we executed during the second quarter. Also during the quarter, we recorded a $10.9 million pension settlement charge associated with the termination of the Farmer Brothers Company pension plan for salaried employees effective December 1, 2018. By terminating the plan we reduced overall pension benefit obligations by approximately $24.4 million. The $10.9 million settlement charge is non-cash. As a result of the pension plan termination, we expect to realize lower Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation expenses of approximately $300,000 to $400,000 per year. Now turning to interest expense, net interest expense increased by $0.8 million to $3.3 million in the quarter compared to $2.5 million for the second quarter of last year, principally due to higher borrowings primarily related to the Boyd's acquisition and the write-off of deferred financing costs associated with ending of our prior loan agreement, which was replaced with a new facility in November 2018. Other income decreased by $1.3 million from $1 million in the quarter compared to $2.2 million for the second quarter of last year, primarily due to increased losses on coffee related derivative instruments in the quarter of $0.9 million compared to $0.2 million in the comparable period of the prior fiscal year. Given these derivative losses related to coffee hedges we entered into for the benefit of our customer base, the markdown and inventory values now of $0.9 million in higher expense results in future lower cost of sale in associated higher gross margin rates once we sell through the associated inventory, which is carrying a discounted inventory value from our hedge cost. Turning to income taxes, we recorded an income tax benefit of $2.7 million in the quarter and our tax rate was 21%. The higher tax expense of $16.8 million in the prior year quarter was impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, that resulted in a reduction of our estimated effective tax rate and a recalculation of our deferred tax assets. Net loss available to common stockholders for the quarter was $10.2 million or a loss of $0.60 per diluted share compared to a net loss available to common stockholders of $17.2 million or a loss of $1.03 per diluted share in the prior year period. Adjusted EBITDA improved 18.4% to $12.4 million for the quarter compared to $10.5 million in the prior year while adjusted EBITDA margins improved to 7.8% for the quarter compared to 6.3% for the same period last year. Now let's turn to the balance sheet. At the end of the quarter we had $13.3 million in cash and we had $130 million borrowed on our revolving credit facility. Our debt, net of cash, at fiscal year-end was $116.7 million compared to $90 million as of September 30, 2018. Our debt, net of cash, increased primarily due to the purchase of plant, property and equipment, higher inventory levels and receivables, offset by higher accounts payables. The higher inventory levels we were carrying at the end of the quarter were planned in anticipation of ending the Boyd's transitions service arrangements as of October and the shutdown of Boyd's production. These higher inventory levels were important to ensure we continue to meet customer demand while we transition production from the Boyd's facility into our facilities. Over the course of the year these higher inventory levels we expect to fall, which should deliver improved working capital as we run down the excess inventory build. We also saw our accounts receivable balances increase during the quarter above historical levels. This was primarily driven by short-term interruption of collection activities of distribution customers acquired with the Boyd's acquisition as we are integrating their collection processes into our ERP system during the quarter. The elevated receivable balances have begun to come down through February and we anticipate further improvement during the remainder of the quarter. Our bank availability under our credit facility at the end of the quarter was $20 million compared to $21.2 million as of September 30, 2018. As we discussed on our last conference call, we replaced our existing asset-based credit facility on November 5th with the new cash flow-based senior secured revolving credit facility with a borrowing limit of up to $150 million and an accordion feature allowing us to increase the commitment by up to an additional $75 million subject to certain conditions. Now turning to capital expenditures, for the second quarter our capital expenditures in cash were $15.3 million, with $7.1 million related to maintenance and $8.2 million to add further capabilities to our Northlake, Texas facility. Depreciation and amortization expense was $7.9 million in the second quarter versus $8.1 million in the same period of the prior year. The decrease in this expense primarily related to assets that became fully depreciated. Based on our existing fixed asset commitments and the useful lives of our intangible assets, including the addition of assets from the Boyd's acquisition, we continue to expect depreciation and amortization expense to run at approximately $8.0 million to $8.5 million per quarter for the next several quarters. Now turning to our outlook for the remainder of fiscal 2019. As we look towards the back half of the fiscal year, we expect year-over-year pounds and revenues to decline in the third quarter, principally driven by continued softness in our direct ship business in addition to the impact of lower year-over-year coffee prices on revenues charged to our cost plus customers. In addition, we will continue to experience the negative impacts from the volume loss for two of the brands we had historically serviced being brought in-house by the owner of those brands. We expect the growth trends to improve in the fourth quarter compared with the third quarter as we realized increased shipments from new account wins in both our large direct ship business and channel business, although both pounds and revenue in the fourth quarter are expected to be down from a year ago. And as Mike noted, we continue to anticipate adjusted EBITDA in the range of $49 million to $52 million, benefiting from higher synergies on Boyd's and lower cost to be realized from route optimization, offset by softer revenues. Finally, regarding the acquisition of Boyd's, subsequent to the quarter-end, on January 23rd, 2019, PricewaterhouseCooper, the party appointed to resolve our working capital dispute with Boyd's, issued its determination letter. Prior to the resolution, the best estimate of the post-closing working capital adjustment was $8.1 million. The post-closing net working capital adjustment as finally determined by the independent expert is $6.3 million. Under the terms of the asset purchase agreement, Boyd's, the seller, is required to pay the Company the absolute value of the amount by wire transfer of immediately available funds or at the option of the Company, we may resort to the hold back to satisfy this amount or net against certain amounts otherwise due to the seller under the asset purchase agreement. We are currently discussing funding methods of the working capital shortfall along with the Company's other indemnity claims with the seller. We have not yet agreed on whether this deficiency will be settled in a cash payment or through retention of amounts held in the hold back. Due to the conversion pricing specified in the asset purchase agreement for using hold back stock to settle amounts [Technical Difficulty] agreed upon funding method may impact the amount of working capital shortfall realized upon final resolution. Now I'll turn the call back to Mike for closing remarks.