Thank you, David. If you follow Evolus for any length of time, we're acutely focused on millennial consumers. They're digitally savvy. They consider aesthetic medicine to be part of everyday life and are willing to spend money to prevent aging. While this demographic is the future growth driver of the aesthetic toxin market interestingly, there's very little published on millennials in the medical literature. In June, Dermatological Surgery published a new post-hoc analysis on our Phase 3 trials, comparing millennial patients to non-millennials. And we believe this is the first paper on millennials in glabellar lines. This paper was based on pool data from our three studies, totaling 737 patients. It also included some important subjective metrics, such as global aesthetic improvement and subject satisfaction. As you'd expect the average age between the two groups was different, 28 versus 58. By comparison, the baseline severity of glabellar lines at maximum frown was similar 72% severe in the millennials and 76% in the non-millennials. However, there was a difference in the number of patients with severe glabellar lines at rest, only 3% of millennials compared to 23% in the non-millennials. It's this process of aging and permanent wrinkle formation that the millennials are trying to prevent or delay. We already know that Jeuveau works well in non-millennials. And this came out clearly in the studies. When we looked at efficacy in millennials as measured by a one point or greater improvement on the glabellar line scale at maximum frown, we found that by day two 60% were already responders. And surprisingly by day seven, 14 and 30, the responder rates were 100%. At the end of the study, day 150, over 40% of millennials were responders. A similar pattern emerged when we looked at global aesthetic improvement with 100% responder rates at day seven, 14 and 30. And at the end of the study, 62% of subjects felt aesthetically that they were still improved or much improved. Finally, looking at subject satisfaction. By day two, 62% of millennials were responders and day seven, 14 and 30, 100% were responders. Even at the end of the study, day 150 or five months, subject satisfaction was still high at 79%. The safety profile did not demonstrate any differences between the two groups, and there were no serious adverse events related to the drug. So, in conclusion, we already knew that Jeuveau worked very well in non-millennials. And now we have data that shows Jeuveau works even better in millennials, our target demographic. Lastly, just a quick update on the Phase 2 extra-strength study. We recently announced the completion of enrollment. Patient follow up is ongoing, and we remain on track to complete the trial by the first half of 2023. Back to you David.