Greetings and welcome to the DoubleVerify Second Quarter 2021 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Tejal Engman. Thank you. The floor is yours.

Good afternoon and thank you for joining us to discuss DoubleVerify's second quarter 2021 financial results. With me today is Mark Zagorski, CEO and Nicola Allais, CFO. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that statements made on this call contain forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to inherent risks, uncertainties and changes and reflect our current expectations and information currently available to us and our actual results could differ materially. For more information, please refer to the risk factors in our recent SEC filings, including our S-1 registration statement. In addition, our discussion today will include references to certain supplemental non-GAAP financial measures and should be considered in addition to and not as a substitute for our GAAP results. Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures are available in today's earnings press release, which is available on our investor relations website at ir.doubleverify.com. With that, I'll turn it over to Mark.

Thank you, Tejal, and thanks, everyone, for joining us this evening. We're excited to have delivered another quarter of strong top and bottom-line growth, with second quarter revenue growing 44% year-over-year, exceeding our prior guidance and adjusted EBITDA growth coming in at a solid 35% year-over-year. The DoubleVerify story continues to be one of strong revenue growth and profitability, driven by successful product innovation and clear market leadership in a rapidly evolving digital advertising ecosystem. Our accelerated revenue growth is driven by our product success in fast growing sectors such as programmatic, social and CTV and a global expansion strategy that's winning large enterprise clients in a growing number of international markets. Our innovative industry-leading software platform continues to scale rapidly across the global digital advertising ecosystem, driving more data, better analytics and deeper insights, which combine to yield better results for our advertisers. And our growing roster of accreditations and privacy certifications continue to distinguish us in the marketplace. We have raised our full year revenue guidance and are excited about DV's long-term growth trajectory as our platform expands from verifying the quality of media impressions to helping drive ad performance with the objective of maximizing return on ad spend for our clients. Working to drive performance outcomes create stickier relationships with advertiser partners and greater opportunities to generate revenue. Let's take a few minutes to dig into our key revenue growth drivers. Starting with programmatic, revenue from authentic brand safety, or ABS, our market-leading prebid solution, grew 112% year-over-year, driven by wide scale adoption on Google's DV360 platform, where it was launched in the fourth quarter of 2020. ABS continues to roll out on additional programmatic buying platforms around the globe, creating greater opportunities for advertisers to upgrade to this premium solution. In the second quarter, we successfully…

Thank you, Mark. We're pleased to have delivered $76.5 million of revenue in the second quarter of 2021 as compared to $53 million in the second quarter of 2020. Our 44% year-over-year growth rate in this quarter is even more impressive considering that despite the pandemic, we grew by a robust 22% in the second quarter of 2020. Overall, revenue growth was driven by growth in the volume of Media Transactions Measured, gross revenue retention remaining above 95% for the quarter, while our new enterprise client wins continuing to increase our market share. Second quarter 2021 adjusted EBITDA was $21.2 million, representing a 28% EBITDA margin as compared to $15.6 million or a 30% margin in the second quarter of 2020 as we invest in global operations, including product and engineering to continue to drive long-term growth. A net loss of $12.6 million this quarter was entirely due to $18.9 million of one-time IPO-related transaction costs. Cost of revenue increased by $4.6 million year-over-year in the second quarter, primarily due to higher costs from revenue-sharing arrangements with our programmatic partners as the programmatic revenue grew as a percentage of total revenue, but also due to increased investments in cloud-based hosting solutions to provide the scale and flexibility necessary to support our volume growth. Our second quarter product development costs increased by $4.2 million year-over-year as we extended our first quarter investments in scaling our operations globally and accelerating our product roadmap into new verticals. We are focused on executing our long-term growth strategy and to that end have ramped our investments in hiring talent with a particular focus on sales, engineering and product. Sales, marketing and customer support expenses increased by $6.8 million in the second quarter of 2021 as we expanded our market presence in international markets, including building…

[Operator instructions] Our first question comes from Mark Murphy with JPMorgan.

Yes. Thank you very much and congrats on the strength of results. I wanted to ask about your 2021 Global Insights Report, which showed overall fraud is down 30%. But it seemed to show some different activity in mobile app and connected TV. So two questions on that. First of all, to what do you attribute that overall decline in fraud? And second, how is the nature of fraud changing in the connected TV arena?

Okay. It's a great question, Mark. Thanks. And thanks for reading the report. We love when our analysts dig in on our research. It's awesome. So we'll dig in on yours too. So the first thing we want to talk about on the fraud side, it's an important thing to note that as we saw fraud rates decrease on a significant basis, overall, there's still a significant amount of fraud volume in the marketplace. However, what we've seen is that there's a direct correlation between what we call prebid fraud avoidance and prebid filtering with post-bid declines in fraud measurement. What that means is as clients use and employ our prebid filtering solutions like ABS, we see that actually having a direct impact on the amount of fraud that we see in post-bid measurement. So in some aspects; it shows what we're doing is working. By filtering out impressions before they even make it to a buyer's purview, it allows us to actually drive down the overall rate of fraud that we see across the board. The other thing to think about -- so the other half of your question regarding CTV. As we've noted in the past, as the demand for CTV inventory continues to grow and as the CPMs around that inventory accelerate, there's obviously a huge amount of opportunity for people to try to perpetrate fraud in that space. It's the whole idea of why do people rob banks, that's where the money is. Well, why is their fraud heading toward CTV, because that's where the money is. And there's a couple of main ways that we've seen fraud start to proliferate there. The first is really around what we call device spoofing. And this is where a mobile device or another type of device, desktop device…

Excellent, Mark. Thank you very much for the very clear answer and it is great to see that correlation with what you're trying to do prebid and what's happening post-bid.

Our next question comes from Arjun Bhatia with William Blair.

Wonderful. Thank you and congrats on the strong quarter. I heard in the prepared remarks that you established a new client and agency partnership team. I would just love to hear a little bit more about that. How they're going to be working with your largest accounts and maybe how that might change the revenue growth that's coming from your existing customers versus perhaps new accounts that are coming onboard.

Yes. Arjun, it's a great question. Thanks for picking up on that note because it is a really interesting and important endeavor for us. Just to kind of maybe give a quick background of why the team was put together. As we've seen ongoing consolidation with the way that advertisers are approaching verification solutions, i.e., they're collapsing point solutions into a single platform solution, we've been the beneficiary of that because our solutions see across viewability and across brand safety and suitability and across geographic alignment and across fraud. The enterprises have looked to consolidate that and the enterprises have looked to consolidate their business globally as well. So that meant the way we dealt with clients either on a regional basis or on a solution basis really didn't line up with where they were going and where the industry was going. So we built this team to address the larger needs -- the global needs of enterprise clients, so folks like Unilever and Mondelez that we work with around the world, as well as approaching new clients that are looking for a multifunctional global relationship. And I think that's the key, is that enterprise clients are looking for an enterprise partner to service their needs in any place around the world. What that also means is that when we're approaching new clients, we can do so from a position of power, not only from how our solution is built, but from how our team is organized. We find more often than not, we are no longer looking at deals in one country to the next. But we're looking at deals that encompass multiple countries. We have, in some of our brands, for example, they work with us in over 75 markets around the world. So our approach to both…

Perfect. That sounds very interesting. That's very helpful. And one more, if I could, for Nicola. Obviously, you're seeing strength in your business. It seems that programmatic growth has certainly exceeded expectations this quarter. Can you maybe just talk about your guidance and how you're looking at the back half of the year because it seems like we're keeping second half growth rates relatively constant with the revised full year guidance?

Yes, Arjun, good question. So first, I would just want to spend a moment on second quarter, which was strong at 44% growth. And how we got there was, as you said, programmatic was very strong, ABS continued to drive that part of the growth. But we also saw a return of spend for some of the customers that had paused last year during the pandemic. As you know, our revenue is not tied to CPMs. And so, even last year in the second quarter, we grew 22% in the second quarter of 2020. This year's 44% growth in the second quarter is all that more impressive right because it's just driven by volume. For the second half, we are still seeing an uncertain operating environment related to COVID. And so, our view is to remain prudent. We're not hearing this from our advertisers necessarily that they're looking to pull back. But the general environment feels that we ought to be prudent when we look at the second half of the year. And that's sort of how we put the guidance out there. It is still a 34% growth rate for the year with margins over 30%, which gives you still a rule of 60, which is what we're committed to.

Thank you very much, and congrats on the quarter.

Our next question comes from Youssef Squali with Truist Securities.

Thank you. Congrats on a solid quarter, your second in a row post-IPO. So maybe the first question to Nicola, just a follow-up to the prior question about guidance. So you're obviously up against some tougher comps in Q3 because the growth rate went from 22% up to 36%, so I'm sorry, to 32% last year. I was wondering just if maybe you can peel that onion a little bit, maybe speak to what you're baking in, in terms of advertiser direct versus programmatic for the second half? And then, on the TikTok open beta, congrats. That's a really great news. How long does the beta last, is the U.S. one of the 14 countries where you are? Maybe Mark, you can just provide some additional color, commentary there. Just trying to understand kind of the timing of TikTok potentially becoming a paying client and then how do we go about maybe getting our arms around the possibility for contribution to revenues over time, I guess, in 2022, which you're not guiding to right now, but just kind of qualitatively, if you may.

Yes. Youssef, I'll take the guidance question around Q3. So we're anticipating -- we've had great success with programmatic. That's really leading the charge, especially with the adoption of ABS. So what we are anticipating is that the shift toward programmatic versus direct will continue in Q3. So you should see programmatic as a percent of revenue continue to expand in Q3. But we're not seeing any sort of degradation with the direct side. We have some large enterprise wins that have come in, in the first half of the year that will also contribute to the growth. But what you've seen in the patterns in the first and second quarter, you should expect to continue in the third quarter, for sure.

And on the TikTok opportunity, we're obviously very excited about that because our advertisers are leaning into that. We kicked off our first client advisory council earlier this year. And one of the main areas that they focused on is, hey, we love TikTok as a potential advertising venue, we would love to see you guys extend your solution set there, so we could feel confident with our advertising spend on TikTok as we do everywhere else. So we are excited to be part of the beta. And right now, of the 14 markets we're in, U.S. is part of that group and those are advertiser-driven markets, as well as TikTok-driven markets. And we're looking for a likely Q4 implementation. It will be a slow role as with all uptake. But the great thing about that opportunity is, it will be as robust as the spend that heads into that spaces. As you know, we have a model in which advertisers, once they click on that seatbelt for protection, they use us in every venue they possibly can. And as we see, social has been a really strong growth area for us. It grew 100% year-over-year in Q2. And there's no slowing down of social spend. So we think that TikTok can be a nice addition to our roster of partners that were we currently work with on the social side, including YouTube and Twitter and Facebook and Snap and Pinterest and Instagram. So having them as part of that legion, I think, will definitely have a nice impact on 2022. It's too early to say how big that will be, but it really is driven by advertiser interest because we are there -- once we're there, we're there and they will use us on the impressions that they spend on TikTok.

And just to clarify, Mark, do you know if any of your competitors are also kind of working on similar support of the TikTok platform? Or are you guys the first, at least in the U.S.?

Yes. I mean, there are other participants in the beta, but we obviously have a unique position with our client base. And that's the nice thing to remember about where we sit is, our current enterprise relationships with the largest brands mean that once we have a new venue to measure against any dollars that they're spending there for the most part immediately get turned on with us.

Our next question comes from Michael Graham with Canaccord.

Thank you. Hey, Mark, you mentioned in your prepared remarks, this move from measuring quality to measuring performance which I know you've talked about before. But I wonder if you could just spend a second kind of talking about two things. One, does that move you into a different set of competitors in the business? And then, the second thing is, could you just talk about what sort of scale of development it takes to kind of move you firmly into that performance measurement area, I mean, more firmly than you already are? And then as a quick follow-up to the guidance, Nicola, could you just remind us on revenue visibility? Is that evolving in sort of like are there things that could happen that could surprise you to the upside, I guess, as we get through the rest of the year?

Great. I'll take the first part. Nicola, you jump in on the second. So on the move or what we'd like to say kind of the transformation and evolution from protection to performance, the interesting thing about that is that the gap between protection and performance is actually much more narrow than you think. Because core verification, so eliminating fraud, eliminating impressions that can't be seen, eliminating impressions that aren't in the right geo or are not brand-safe, that is the first step in performance. So once we take the big meat cleaver to inventory and say these things are off the table, we've already improved performance. So when we think about our evolution into the space, it's really an extension of what we're currently doing. It's an extension of moving from taking a big slice of inventory off the page. It's now using a scalpel right and finding within what's left, what's really good, what will really drive the highest level of performance. And the best part about that, so the question about what does it take from a development perspective, it all uses the same core data set. And that's like the magic of our business. We talk about this flywheel, which is all of the data that we're capturing on context and behavior and geography, all of that gets reused into performance solutions. And whether it's contextual targeting or authentic attention or whatever is next for us in those solutions, it's leveraging the same data asset and repurposing it into an entirely new -- using it for an entirely new application. That's what gets us so excited about like the core flywheel here because we get more data as we drive our verification business. That verification business then fuels new solutions. And those new solutions allow us…

And Michael, on the surprises to the upside, I would focus mainly on Q4. I think we've been consistent with our view that we're being prudent, especially in the fourth quarter which is generally our strongest quarter in a normalized year. I think the surprises would come from a complete return to a normal operating environment that is not necessarily entirely baked. As we've always said, we're being prudent in that fourth quarter, so it would be volume. It would be measured transactions-driven rather than price for sure. And it would be for existing customers if the activity levels increase beyond where we see them at this point. There are other potential positives related to unlocking volumes with our partners on social and CTV. Those are not a certain -- I think the biggest positive upside would be just volume on a normalized basis from our existing customers which is something that we're being prudent about.

Our next question comes from Matt Hedberg with RBC Capital Markets.

Hey, Mark. Obviously, really strong growth this year off of the COVID year or the COVID quarter last year. I'm curious, when you look at some of these customers that obviously faced a lot of stress last year, have you noticed any difference in how they're leveraging your platform today maybe than versus pre-COVID? In other words, are they leaning into digital advertising more or different? Just wondering because I would imagine there could be some interesting trends coming out of some of those customers.

It's a really good question, Matt. I think the way that we would look at it is are they leaning into specific sectors more than we've seen in the past. And the two that we always like to call out are CTV and social. And I think those are both advertiser-based changes but also consumer engagement changes. So we saw a lot of different behavior emerge based on COVID, things like drive time in a way and home time became the drive time. With that also came additional screen usage. And I think to there is that we've seen dollars flow into more then CTV and social. Social is interesting because at this time last year, it was going through a pretty heady upheaval regarding a lot of the social movements that were out there and concerns about dollars being put into there. What that did for us, it wasn't that advertisers didn't want to be in social, they wanted to make sure that they are in social the right way. And that helped us quite a bit -- as seen 100% year-over-year revenue growth in social. So I don't know if that's a behavioral change from advertisers but it was certainly something that has evolved over the last year. And on the CTV front, I mean, that is a behavioral change that I think has -- will never go back. I mean, the idea of watching over-the-top the incredible increase in content and even ad-supported content over-the-top is truly a massive shift. And the comfort through which advertisers now have in buying that inventory -- in CTV inventory has considerably grown and it's grown our business. And that's why we've leaned so heavily into not only new solutions around CTV and extending our core solutions to CTV but ensuring that those solutions are accredited and ensuring that we build more confidence there. So if there's been a behavioral shift, I think we see those two sectors being the benefit, at least for us and where our advertisers are spending their money.

No, that makes a ton of sense. And just it feels like with all the structural changes that I think we're all expecting you guys to benefit from, it feels like what you suggested should certainly pay one.

Yes, for sure.

Our next question comes from Andrew Boone with JMP Securities.

I got two please. So the doubling of adoption of advertisers for custom contextual this quarter was impressive. Can you talk about how you move advertisers from kind of testing the product to being an always-on tool and returns that they're seeing? Additionally, can you talk about the impact of pricing that the move to performance has and how we think about that moving through the model? And then I've got a follow-up.

Sure. So on the custom contextual, we're happy with the uptake, for sure. I think it's a great, again, example of using our core asset to move further down the performance route and also at a premium rate. So these two questions work really well together. When we think about how we move clients into custom contextual, the gray part is through Pinnacle, which is our software platform. We have a wonderful embed solution that allows them to take the same data that they're using for measurement and post-bid measurement and flow that into their custom contextual targeting solutions. So for us, a lot of this upsell in the contextual is working with our core clients that is already in place and literally just working with the data and the assets that they've been using to measure post-bid and through their integrations with the DSPs on a prebid side, leveraging that distribution. And that is, again, the magic of our model, which is the distribution is in place, the core data is there. It's about moving that data into those distribution cycles via new products. And custom contextual is one of those. So it has been a great example of how we see product introductions down the road. We think there is a lot of great core opportunities around custom contextual and that product in itself I think it is all about timing. And with what's going on around the deprecation of cookies and other performance solutions that were based on either audience data or some level of what's now considered PII or third-party cookies, all of those things are going to be challenged. So in the old -- everything old is new again. Context is truly starting to become at the forefront of a lot of the advertisers' minds when it comes to optimizing performance. The second half of your question on pricing with performance solutions, again, it's a nice place to be because performance -- there's always what do you pay for a car and what do you pay for the seatbelt for a car. A seatbelt you have to have and it's critically important and you use it every time. But that engine that really drives it and drives performance is what you pay a premium for. And that's the great thing about our performance solutions is that they are sold at a premium. And as they continue to grow, it gives us an opportunity to drive our average fee structure. That takes time. They're really new. So we're not building that into our individual forecasts over the next year or so. But as they build up steam and as they become a larger portion of our overall revenue, there is the potential for them to increase our overall rate.

That makes a lot of sense. And then, on CTV, I think viewability and video filtering are relatively new features. I guess just taking a step back, can you talk about your position competitively and where you think DV is differentiated today? And is this really kind of a spear in terms of new account wins at all or how is CTV going into your go-to-market and sales pitch?

Yes. So CTV continues to grow for us as a percentage of our overall video revenue. I think it makes up now over 30% of our direct business, of our direct revenue from our direct -- of our video business on the direct side of the company. So CTV continues to be an important factor. From a competitive perspective, I would challenge the fact that there's anyone who has a tool set that is as robust as ours across all the different vectors, across brand safety, across viewability, across impression counting in fraud. We were first to market with CTV solutions. We are the only ones in market now of brand suitability tiers across CTV. And so, there's a significant number of advantages. And as CTV becomes, as you said, the tip of the spear for a lot of advertisers, I think our ability to have a solution, to have the only app-level brand safety that's out there currently, to have the kinds of relationships that we have with folks like Roku and Hulu and Amazon. Those are clear talking points and discussion points when we go into clients because they're asking about those things. And having leadership on the accreditation side, having the leadership on the functionality side, and having leadership on the partnership side are real differentiators. So I think that we were lucky enough or prescient enough to see CTV on the horizon a few years ago. We started down that path a while ago. And now I think we've built a nice leadership position there as well.

Our next question comes from Yun Kim with Loop Capital Markets.

Congrats on a solid quarter. Just on the international growth, which again was very strong, very impressive, are you seeing the same growth dynamics that you're seeing in the U.S. for the international market? Is that driven just like the U.S. social, connected TV channels and also adoption of ABS?

Yes, it's a great question. Thanks for it. So there are definitely different dynamics outside of the U.S. CTV, for example, is not a factor, and that's just -- it's not a media factor the way it is in the U.S. in most global markets. It's very, very different. But what is interesting is the amount of social that we see outside of the U.S. So social is a real driver outside the U.S. For a lot of reasons because in many markets, it's not only the dominant engagement mechanism, it's one of the safest. So particularly, if you look at the APAC region. It's a mobile-first market. It's a mobile-first market and social and mobile go hand-in-hand together. So you see growth there being driven by social much more than you may see in other parts of the world. But overall, our growth outside the U.S., APAC at 73%, EMEA 62%. Overall, over 60% growth rate outside of the Americas is represented not only in the organic growth in those markets, but the considerable amount of white space that we have to fill in there. And I think that's why when we talk about our people investments for the year, I think in the first -- in Q2, 56% of our people investments were outside the U.S. And it's because not only do we see great enterprise growth with our current clients outside the U.S., but there's still a lot of white space to fill in. And I think that's really exciting for us. And again, those markets are a bit different. So they're social-first markets, they're mobile-first markets, in many cases like in APAC. But the nice part of where we sit is we're agnostic to that. The whole driver behind our business is verify everywhere. And that means no matter what platform, no matter what market, no matter how someone is buying or trading inventory, whatever type of media they're on, whether it's social or CTV or just regular display ads, our solutions can meet those needs. So that's the key part of being a platform. It's the idea that whatever market demands they are and how they vary from place to place that we have a solution that can meet that. And it's a great question as you asked, every market is different and the drivers in those markets are different. But for us, having a solution that can meet any of those demands is critical, and we're taking advantage of that.

Okay, great. That's very helpful. I have a question for Nicola. So with the company, obviously, you guys are getting scale. Customers are spending more on your platform. Are you beginning to see some of your larger customers looking to do maybe annual contracts where they can commit to a certain volume upfront for a discount?

So it's a good question, Yun. We are testing more volume tiering in terms of pricing, that is the -- sort of the rather we're taking with our customers. Our plan and you know it is -- our strategy is really volume-based expansion to benefit from being able to verify new verticals and new geographies. So our strategy, which has been successful and which our customers are liking is volume tiering above and beyond certain impression levels. That's the route that we've taken so far.

Our next question comes from Justin Patterson with KeyBanc.

Mark, could you talk about which inning you are in with respect to getting more inventory, more volumes, running through social and CTV. Is it more of the case the platforms just need to grant you more access to that inventory? Or are there some additional investments you need to make there? And then for Nicola, a follow-up on commentary you made around volumes. It is a very strong digital advertising year, but it's also one being led more by price than impression volume. How are you thinking about those dynamics into the second half since it'll likely be the case that price inflation may even get worse and available impressions remain fairly light?

Really good questions, Justin. Thanks for those. So you mentioned social and CTV. And the interesting thing about those two venues is the expansion of business there are on two opposite fronts. On the CTV side, we have really good broad coverage, but I think the opportunity there is getting deeper. On the brand safety front and a lot of the other things that are becoming increasingly important to advertisers, getting show-level or program-level data, I think, is the next step for us to continue to create more transparency within CTV. So I think from a broad perspective, we cover a great deal of CTV through some of the partnerships that we have and we're really happy with those. The next step of growth there, I think, from a verification perspective and a performance perspective is getting deeper. And I think that will eventually come. On the social side, that is a great case of getting broader and broader within certain channels. And I think there was some public; there was an article recently that was published in the advertising trades around Facebook and other platforms opening up to third-party measurement and third-party verification solutions and when that would happen and how that would happen. I think the industry is ready for that. I think we are all certainly interested in helping to drive greater transparency and help drive more confidence and more ad dollars to social. And to do so, it's really about opening up more inventory there. So I think that is very different than the CTV opportunity where we're going for depth. It's a little bit of breadth. I think that there are still longer tail social networks that continue to ebb and flow with their interest from an advertiser perspective. But the interesting real opportunity here is as more social networks start to open up more of their direct news feed or their direct core feed opportunities to third parties, I think that's where we see some real light and our advertisers would be really excited to see it as well.

Yes. And Justin, on your question around price inflation, I think I'll go back to our second quarter results with 44% growth, which was volume driven. We were not subject to the swings in CPMs that would have driven our revenue maybe higher. But we have a very steady, repeatable business model that's based on volume. We're going to remain committed to that as our strategy at this point, which is the volume-based expansion is what's going to drive our business for now. We do continue to evaluate whether we should adjust MTF based on the quality of the type of the media. We don't see that as an immediate exposure. I think for the second half of the year, which was your more direct question, the volumes are returning to a more normalized pattern. We're being prudent, but they are returning to normalized pattern. So we don't see that as a real risk for the second half of the year seeing volumes coming down.

Our next question goes to Raimo Lenschow with Barclays.

Thanks for squeezing me in, and congrats as well from my side. The two questions, one for Mark. We talked a little bit about the international performance and you had some comments in the slides. Just talk a little bit about the organizational build out there. Like how comfortable are you with kind of where you are? The growth rates are clearly impressive but like, obviously, you're starting from a lower base. Like talk a little bit about more where you are as an organization. And then, the second question is for Nicola. Like you beat revenue but, obviously, on EBITDA, you are more in line, which suggests kind of more reinvestment in the business. Can you just talk a little bit about how you kind of run that kind of revenue performance versus reinvestment into growth?

Thanks, Raimo. And it was nice interconnectivity between those questions. So Nicola and I will definitely tag-team that. On the international side, to be transparent, I think we're playing a little bit of catch-up with regard to people investment there. We didn't open operations for the most part -- sales operations for the most part outside Americas until 2018. So we've scaled up -- we've been really leaning into scaling up those teams and resources over the last several quarters. As I mentioned earlier, 56% of our headcount growth for the second quarter came outside of the Americas because we've seen lots of white space and opportunity there. Look, the nice part of what we've been able to build is we leverage this tent pole model, of which -- we go in with a global or an enterprise client into a specific market and then use that client as a basis for which to build the team, but then leverage resource -- or leverage those same resource to go out and sell localized clients. We did this in Japan with Yahoo! JAPAN, where since then, we've closed clients like Sony and Fujifilm and many others. We've done this with Mondelez in India, where we've closed a large number of local clients there. So the nice part is, we've got the model down, we've got the muscle built. Now we're just fueling that muscle with additional resources. So we're catching up rapidly. I think we're in a good place right now. We probably have -- I wouldn't say -- I think at this point, we've done a good job of investing there. We probably will not have to lean in as hard over the next few quarters as we've had this quarter as far as percentage of resources in those markets because we're getting up to par there. But based on our growth and where we see white space, I think it's been a really great investment. And as noted earlier in the Q&A, this is not just for going out and getting clients in Germany or getting clients in Southeast Asia. It's also about supporting enterprise clients who are increasingly looking for a single partner to support all of their business worldwide. And when you look at the kind of names that we closed this quarter, so Diageo and BMW and others like that, those are global enterprise clients and they want support around the world. So we're going to give it to them and we're in a great place to continue to do that.

And Raimo, I think Mark almost answered already the question. What I would say in terms of reinvestment versus growth, I think Q2 is a good example of that. We were able to close large enterprise clients that are not in the U.S. We achieved a 44% revenue growth. Rest of the world is growing 66%. That's a good trigger for us to say we can accelerate the investments. And the overall margin is still at 28%. That's a number that we can dial up or down as Mark said, we accelerated a little bit in Q2. We don't have to do that in every next quarter. But the math is pretty simple, if you're growing 66% outside of the U.S. and you see an opportunity to accelerate some of the investments in those markets, we will definitely be committed to do that.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to Mark Zagorski for closing remarks.

I want to thank everyone for their questions. In closing, we continue to deliver strong revenue growth and profitability, driven by successful product innovation in fast growing sectors such as programmatic, social and CTV, as well as a global expansion strategy that's winning large enterprise clients in a growing number of international markets. In addition, we continue to cement our leadership in a global market that's benefiting from a secular shift to digital advertising. We appreciate your time and attention today. We look forward to updating you on success in our future calls.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s webcast, you may now disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation and have a great day.