Good morning, and welcome to the Dice Holdings, Inc. Second Quarter 2014 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jennifer Bewley, Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications. Please go ahead.

Thanks, Gary, and good morning, everyone. With me on the call today is Mike Durney, President and CEO of Dice Holdings; along with John Roberts, our CFO. This morning, we issued a press release describing the company's results for the second quarter of 2014. A copy of that release can be viewed on the company's website at diceholdingsinc.com. Before I hand the call over to Mike, I'd like to note that today's call includes certain forward-looking statements, particularly statements regarding future financial and operating results of the company and its businesses. These statements are based on management's current expectations or beliefs and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by these statements herein, due to changes in economic, business, competitive, technological and/or regulatory factors. The principal risks that could cause our results to differ materially from our current expectations are detailed in the company's SEC filings, including our annual report on Form 10-K in the sections entitled Risk Factors, Forward-looking Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations. The company is under no obligation to update any forward-looking statements except as required by the federal securities laws. Today's call also includes certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, and free cash flow. For details on these measures, including why we use them and reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures, please refer to our earnings release and our Form 8-K that has been furnished to the SEC, both of which are available on our website. Now I'll turn the call over to Mike.

Great. Thanks, Jennifer. Welcome to the Dice Holdings second quarter earnings results conference call. First, I'll turn the call over to John to give you an update on our Q2 financial performance. Then I'll cover the progress we are making on our strategic plan on Open Web and on other product improvements. In addition, I'll spend a few minutes discussing the integration of our recent acquisitions. In fact, today, I'm in our Denver office working with the health care team. And then finally, we'll open it up to your questions. So with that quick summary, I'll turn it over to John.

Thanks, Mike. Today, I want to start by highlighting areas of progress that are reflected in our second quarter financial performance. We had better results than we anticipated in Q2, primarily due to outperformance in our Tech & Clearance and Energy segments, as well as better results from Slashdot Media. That revenue fell through to our adjusted EBITDA line as cash operating expenses were in line with our expectations. We've been working diligently on reinvigorating our operations, and there are several areas of improvement in the quarter. First, modestly improved sales performance, particularly within eFinancialCareers; second, signed the stabilization in a number of recruitment package customers at Dice.com from Q1; and third, solid recovery in our cash flow after a lower-than-normal first quarter. Second quarter revenues increased 28% or $14.5 million year-over-year to $66.5 million, with the majority of that growth, $14 million of it, coming from our businesses that we acquired within the last 12 months. The $14 million reflects the negative impact of $1 million for the fair value adjustment to deferred revenue related to purchase accounting for the acquisitions. Profitability remains strong, with adjusted EBITDA at 34% of adjusted revenues, and up 26% year-over-year to $23.2 million. In Q2, recruiting activity remained favorable in each of our 6 specialized categories and most of the markets in regions that we serve. In Tech & Clearance, revenues increased 5% year-over-year, including $2.5 million from our acquisition of The IT Job Board. For Dice.com, revenues declined 3% year-over-year. At June 30, Dice recruitment package customers were 8,000, essentially stable with account on March 31. While we don't get too optimistic about early signs of stability, we are pleased to have the unfavorable trend abate. Within the Dice recruitment package customer base, there were minimal shifts quarter-over-quarter between shorter-term and annual…

Great. Thanks, John. For today, I want to provide an update on our strategic efforts to position the company for future growth and to lead recruiting's future. In order to fulfill our vision, we need to continue to strengthen our foundation, including, one, introducing new products and services; two, faster innovation in our current services; and three, expanding our market opportunity through acquisition. While this is a work in progress, we're pleased to deliver our second straight quarter of improved year-over-year sales, putting us ahead of where we expected to be at this point in our refresh of the company. That said, our goal is a modest organic growth. So we'll continue to work to deliver the efficient recruiting solutions employers need and enhance our services and product lineup. At our core, we're the leading specialty online recruiting company in 6 key verticals. Fundamentally, we've always known that one career site doesn't fit all careers or all recruiting challenges. The opportunity here is to leverage our specialty focus with great products and apps, great service, as well as data and analytics that help our professionals and employers to be the most efficient and most effective they can be. There will always be more to come from a team that embraces innovation, operates with a sense of urgency and strives for continuous improvement. For now, let's talk about what we've accomplished toward our vision in the second quarter. Starting with Open Web. Open Web is a big data recruiting service that sources publicly available information and creates professional profiles of individuals that are optimized for recruiters and hiring managers. In December last year, we launched Open Web as a separate product available through Dice.com serving North American employers. And I'm pleased to announce we've now launched Open Web in Europe, with…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Tim McHugh with William Blair.

It's actually Stephen Sheldon in for Tim. First, I just wanted to ask about the Slashdot business. Looks like you had a pretty strong quarter there, and the revenue contribution was much higher than we had expected. Is there anything that changed in the business, and what generally drove the improvement there?

Yes, we have seen a change in the Slashdot business. Over the last couple of months, we've focused very much on monetization of the user base, and we've added some pieces to the business where we've been better able to monetize them. We're actually pretty happy now with the way the business has been operating. And I think it'll be important going forward. We're still working on how we interact between Dice and Slashdot, and that's an ongoing process, but as a standalone business, it's actually performed pretty well recently.

Okay. And then on Open Web, I was just wondering how the impact would be reflected in your financials. Would we see the impact mostly in higher average revenue per monthly customer in the IT segment or would it be reported some in other IT revenue as well?

So I think it'll be reflected in a couple of slides. So right now, it's reflected in Tech & Clearance because that's where it's -- the Open Web is sold through that segment right now. As it expands to other segments, you'll potentially see the impact of Open Web growing through those other segments as well. But as we said, it does increase the average revenue per customer since it's typically sold as an additional add-on to a recruitment package.

Okay. And I guess, then lastly, you've been in a period with an accelerated pace of investment in the business, which has brought down margin some. So just want to get some more detail on your progress there. Would you expect to see a continued accelerated level of investment over the next year or 2? Or would you expect some leverage from the investments you made?

So I think what you'll see in the short term you see reflected in the guidance we just gave for the second half of the year. In the beginning, especially in Q2, we didn't make all of the investments that we had anticipated, specifically on the product development side and the marketing side. We do expect to have some catch-up in those investments in Q3 and through the rest of the year, which is reflected in the 30% to 31% margin that we're talking about for the current year. I think as we move forward, we'll see some leverage and some capital -- and some return on that investment. And you won't see the impact on the margin longer-term over the next couple of years.

The next question comes from Randy Reece with Avondale Partners.

First of all, I was wondering what changed to bring down your D&A guidance to a couple of million through the year?

Yes, there were couple of things in there, Randy. So CapEx, a little bit lower than we had initially thought. And also, as we finalize the OilCareers purchase accounting, there were some movement between where that purchase accounting resided on the balance sheet between intangibles and goodwill and some other assets and liabilities. So that brought it down as well.

And I wanted to talk a little about going to market with Open Web and some of your experiences to date. Our own research suggests that there is great demand for this sort of tool because sophisticated recruiters have been doing such searches manually on the open Internet with Internet search engines for years. That's very clunky and not very many people are going to go with the trouble of doing that. The -- I guess, the chasm you have to leap is to get people to feel like they can trust the results and then it works for them. Does this elongate the selling cycle for you? Or do you have the trial with customers pretty long to persuade them that they should be paying for this kind of product?

Yes. I think, Randy, it's actually a mix. As you pointed out, some recruiters and employers have been doing searches like this on their own laboriously for quite a while and see the -- immediately the value in terms of aggregation and how we make it much more efficient. But there's a big part of the customer base that has to be sold on the concept. There's a new way of searching. Some of the parameters are slightly different when you aggregate public information, which is a little bit different. So I would say it's a mix. But we've certainly seen a level of adoption continue to grow in terms of interest, and now we're starting to see it having just at the end of June rolled out, the product into the U.K. and Netherlands and Belgium. But I would say, simply, it's a mix. But we firmly believe it's the future, as do many.

If you look at the revenue upside versus expectations in Dice.com, how much was that driven by Open Web? And how much of it was other nonsubscription revenue?

Well, I think, I mean, I would say conceptually, some of it is Open Web. Although, we're on a pace that's slightly ahead of where we thought we'd be. And the impact from a revenue standpoint, as you know from a subscription standpoint, tends to come further out in the future. So in the near term, it's pretty small. But I think the rest of it is across the board, including IT Job Board is a relatively recent acquisition with some different selling patterns than we've experienced in the U.S. that does exist in the U.K. We've seen revenue come in slightly quicker than we thought. But I would say Open Web versus our expectations is not a big piece.

So it sounds like the retail business has improved, which would be a good leading indicator.

Yes, I think our short-term experience has been slightly better than we had thought.

The next question comes from Youssef Squali with Cantor Fitzgerald. Youssef H. Squali - Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Research Division: Couple of questions, please. I'm trying to just back into some growth -- organic growth numbers for the second half of the year. I was wondering, John, if you can just help us maybe carve those out by segment, so what's implied in your full year guidance for second half of the year between Dice and eFC, et cetera. And then in terms of Open Web, I don't -- maybe I missed this, but can you maybe quantify the number of paying users for Open Web as of 6/30 versus 3/30?

Sure. So with the guidance, I mean, if you look at regular guidance for Q3 and the rest of the year based on where Q2 came in, there's not much organic growth that's reflected in the numbers. I mean, if you look at the change Q2 to Q3, in terms of the range we gave, it's really impacted by a couple of things. So it's primarily impacted by the energy business. So in Q2 in the Energy business, there was the OTC impact, which was several hundred thousand dollars in Q2. So that's bringing down the Q3 number a little bit on the Energy side. And then Q3 in the Slashdot business, that's historically been a little bit of lower quarter due to seasonality. So you see that reflected from Q2 to Q3 in the Corporate & Other segment, which is, as you know, is predominantly on the -- related to Slashdot. Youssef H. Squali - Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Research Division: Okay. So no organic growth at Dice and eFC?

No. Youssef H. Squali - Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Research Division: Okay. All right, and on the Open Web?

So what was the Open Web question again. Oh, the change in the number. Yes, sorry. It was -- we ended the quarter with about 450 paying Open Web customers. Youssef H. Squali - Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Research Division: And what was the number as of Q1?

It's about 300. Youssef H. Squali - Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Research Division: So is the rate accelerating or decelerating or just to get a sense of the trajectory there?

Yes, I think the number 300 at the end of the first quarter includes what we sold in December. So December and January are significant renewal periods, as you know, for our business. And so there was a surge -- relative surge of customers who bought Open Web together with their recruitment package. Q2 historically has been the worst quarter for annual customers in terms of new business and level of retention -- the number of customers up for retention. So what we expect in the second quarter would be quite a bit lower than what we saw in the first quarter, and I think that played out. But it's at our expectations or above. Youssef H. Squali - Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Research Division: And then, Mike, you talked about potential acquisitions, expanding addressable market, et cetera. So you're in 6 verticals now. As you look at the addressable opportunity ahead of you, is it more within those 6 verticals that it would make sense to go deeper? Or do you expect eventually move into a greater number of verticals as you try to grab more share?

Yes, I think as we look out, we don't think there's a tremendous number of other verticals where we can provide the same value that we do in the 6 we're in. There's things we find occasionally, but I wouldn't look at it as new verticals. I would focus on a couple of things. One is international. So there's a number of markets we don't operate in, in tech. And then there's other potential markets for expanding our services, potentially health care down the road, which is a slightly different business. But I would think about international. Then another area to think about is how we get deeper penetration into the customer base? And so we look at things that would add features, functionality, the ability to serve customers and make them more efficient and more effective, and that may be other tools that we could add on to our businesses. So I would really focus on those 2 things more than I would -- and that may be other 2 verticals.

The next question comes from Craig Huber with Huber Research Partners.

Just wondering, can you just give us an update, if you would please, on pricing, I guess, within Dice.com? How much you're charging for a basic package there? And then how much the add-on would be for Open Web, and then also, separately, how much you're charging for Open Web as a standalone product in the U.S.? I have some follow-ons.

Yes. So the pricing for the core product hasn't changed over the last couple of years. You're talking around numbers. For the base level of service, it's about $1,000 for a month for 1 user and 5 job slots. It's about $6,500 for an annual package. And as you know, more than 90% of our customers are under annual package. If you were to buy Open Web in North America, separately, it's about $5,000 for a year. And if you buy it together with the Dice service, you get a discount that's about 25% off of that. So you'd package them together, so you're in the $10,000 range if you buy them at the same time and both for a year. So that pricing hasn't changed since we launched the product as a paid service.

And then also just more broadly, how would you describe pricing in the marketplace here in the U.S. across your verticals among your competitors? I'm just curious what you're seeing up there. Is it stability? Do you see any pricing going up anywhere?

Yes, I would say a couple of things. One, I think from a pricing environment, not much has changed over the last 12 to 18 months. I would say it's a period of relative stability. The only thing that I think happens in pricing is LinkedIn continues to add new pricing levels to their service, so they have more tiering. But from an overall environment standpoint, it really hasn't changed very much. So I certainly think there's a firming over the last -- I'd call it. It's been a while, I'd call it, probably 18 to 24 months.

How would you characterize the impact you're seeing out there from your main competitors of LinkedIn today versus, say, a year ago?

I think it's probably roughly the same. LinkedIn is a great competitor. They do a great job with their service. They continue to add things onto their service. As we've said many times, we believe firmly that LinkedIn brings dollars into the market and they get their share of it. And I think from our standpoint, we continue to focus on efficiency and effectiveness in our verticals. And that's how we compete and win in our verticals. I mean, we are pretty comfortable in the direction we're going from how we provide that value.

And I'd just like to add -- or ask the better tone to your revenues this latest quarter. Has it changed your thinking at all on expenses for the back half of the year? You mentioned some internal investments that guys wanted to do, but you haven't -- do you feel you have any extra latitude now to pick up some spending on the marketing side, for example, in the back half? Just some color would be helpful.

Yes, sure. So I think that's right, and I think that's -- you'll see that reflected in the Q3 guidance we just gave actually. So if you look at -- well, we didn't give specific expense numbers. I mean, you can back in to what the operating expense numbers are for Q3, and the increases really in 2 key areas. So one of them is in the product development area. So you'll remember back at the beginning of the year, we talked about making additional investments over the course of this year in the product and technology area, in Dice.com and Open Web, specifically. It's taken us a little bit longer than we initially anticipated to -- it's really headcount. So it's been taking a little bit longer than initially anticipated to make those hires, but we're still committed to making those investments, and you see that reflected in the numbers in the second half of the year. And then the second part and probably the larger part of the increase in expenses certainly in Q3 is on the marketing side. So again, really around Dice.com and specifically Open Web, as we continue to roll out Open Web, especially roll it out globally, I think you're going to see some increase on the marketing side there, specifically. And that's reflected in the expense growth over the second half of the year.

Yes, I think just to supplement that, I think, what we've been saying for a couple of quarters now is we knew that we needed to make investments in a number of areas in order to compete to win in our verticals, and so we've made those investments. I don't know that our current revenue performance has changed our thinking a whole lot. We know we need to make those investments. So we've made that commitment. What we are pleased about is that some of those investments are now starting to pay off in terms of how the business has performed. We have a long way to go. But initially, we're pretty pleased, and it's nice to see that reflected in the revenue performance versus what we thought 3 and 6 months ago.

I believe you said that in the U.S, your eFinancialCareers revenues this last quarter was down 11% year-over-year. If that's the case, can you just maybe highlight for us what areas you're seeing the most pressure, please?

Yes. So I would say that, that business has underperformed for a while. What I'm pleased about now is as we've reorganized the eFinancialCareers sales and marketing groups, we now have brought on both the marketing lead and the head of sales in that business. And I'm optimistic now that we have the infrastructure in place in order to compete. I think from a competitive standpoint, that is the business that has been the most impacted by direct competition. And I think that will continue. But I think we can perform a lot better serving customers both in North America, specifically, and then global customers' web needs both in North America and outside North America. So we're quite focused on operating performance, and time will tell. But I'm happy now that we have a full group there.

My last question, if I could. I believe the data you guys send out on a monthly basis about your job postings number for, like, Dice.com has been down, I guess, every month for last year or so. Just wondering when you think that might start to turn positive year-over-year given the better revenue trend that you guys saw here in the second quarter.

Yes, that's a good question. Look, I think we've been saying for a while and I think the market's saying that the job posting business is changing. There is a lot more sourcing now. And so while we continue to publish the job number, and it's important for professionals to see the breadth of jobs on the site, the direct correlation between job postings and our revenue performance continues to diverge, and I think you're going to see that more and more with products like Open Web, which is all about sourcing and not about job postings.

Actually, I do have one more question for you. Your tech business here in the U.S., is there any major regional differences you're seeing in how you guys are performing across the U.S. in the major tech hubs out there?

Not much has changed. Silicon Valley continues to be hot. There are other markets that have strength in them. We continue to see that their strength, as we refer to it, closer to the customer, so certainly development, mobile development. Big data is obviously hot. And less heat, the farther away from the customer you go into the back end end and operations. But I don't think it's changed very much. The competition for people with certain skill sets continues to be as hot as ever, and we feel it, too. We're -- John has just referred to the fact, we're trying to hire people, and we had as harder time hiring certain types of skill sets as anybody else.

Gary, do we have any more questions?

The next question comes from Jeff Silber with BMO.

It's Henry Chien calling in for Jeff. I wanted to dig in a little bit into the upside surprise in terms of revenue growth versus your expectations. We've seen a nice uptick in billings and revenue for recruitment package. Just wanted to understand -- if you could help us understand, what's sort of driving that? And has anything -- what has changed over the past quarter that -- from your perspective?

Yes, I think I'll start, and maybe Mike can add in, too. But I think there are a number of things that happened kind of throughout both the Dice.com and the IT JB, The IT Job Board business. Mike talked about them a little bit earlier. And I think there's one specific thing that -- I think there are a number of good things that were just happening over the course of the quarter whether it was Open Web, whether it was improvement in The IT Job Board business. We saw some stabilization in the customer account, which we talked about, and saw some improvement in some of the shorter-term business as well. So I think it was a combination of positive factors within that segment. I mean, I think if you look at the other parts as well, one of the big contributors to the upside from the guidance in total was Slashdot as well. So we did see some fairly significant improvements there over the course of the quarter in terms of the types of products they're on the market with and the success we've had in selling them, particularly in the second quarter.

I think -- sorry, the other thing that -- we had a number of relatively new acquisitions, and some of those acquisitions have different selling patterns and different revenue patterns than what we had before. So, for instance in healthcare and hospitality, those businesses continued to be very job-posting centric and not subscription as our Dice and eFinancialCareers and Rigzone businesses have been in. So understanding those patterns for relatively new acquisitions take some time. And I think the performance of those businesses are showing that the usage continues to be there, and so there's some benefit there. I think that was through in OilCareers, too, which we just acquired in March.

Got it. And do you think that you're seeing share gains? Or is that more of a broad-based overall market growth?

I think it's a little hard to tell in a very short period, on a short-term basis. We're focused on market share, and we're focused on outperforming our market share. But I think it would be hard to determine -- those would be short periods. So I think time will tell.

Got it. And just one last question. In terms of the expenses, you mentioned that product development and sales and marketing, some of it has shifted to the second half. Are there any line items in the quarter that might have shifted from quarter-to-quarter?

No. Those are really only 2. And just to clarify, there's more on the marketing side than it is on the sales side. So it's really product development and marketing I'd focus on.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Ned Davis with William Smith & Company. Ned Davis - Wm Smith & Co.: You made some comments about the metrics on mobile, and I didn't quite understand them. But I really have 2 questions relating to it. Number one, I think you had indicated before that you had been a little bit slow in developing your mobile applications. And I'm wondering where you are right now just generally in the company with those applications. And secondly, is there an increment to revenue and/or margins from the mobile? Or is it just really a necessity to accommodate the way people want to access information?

So I think on the first piece, what I said is that the number of applies per user on the mobile apps is higher than it is on the desktop, which we have found to be interesting and that historically it's been harder to do certain functions on mobile and we've spent a lot of time on development in terms of usability and features and functionality on mobile. And so it's early. But on Android and the iPhone, we've seen higher applies per user, which we find to be fascinating and, hopefully, a trend that will continue. So that was the answer to the first question. I think from wherever you are, we're putting a lot of effort into it. I think we have some more things going on. There's a big focus on the Dice service, which we've talked about for a number of quarters, and that continues. But we have a lot more work to do across the company in terms of mobile. So I'm relatively pleased with where we are, but certainly acknowledge there's a lot more to do. Then what we expect to realize from it, I think that's a common question. Our view is we're trying to be the most efficient and most effective provider to professionals and to employers, and mobile is an important part of being efficient. And so we view it as a delivery mechanism, whether it can be monetized separately over time. That's not our key focus, but we're certainly going to look at different ways that we may be able to monetize it, but that efficiency and effectiveness for professionals and employers is the key to what we focus on. Ned Davis - Wm Smith & Co.: Okay. I guess, I was wondering also on the Dice.com, you mentioned changes or innovation. Could you just maybe sort of state the 3 things that you think in Dice.com you will be doing over not just this year, but the next couple of years, to improve the overall product? And what it can do to the organic growth there going forward. That's the hard thing an analyst has to deal with because Dice has been so successful, but the organic growth has been kind of slow lately.

Yes, so I think it's a fair question. I'm not sure I'm going to articulate the 3 things we're going to work on going forward. But if you go back to efficiency and effectiveness, how we deliver candidates and professionals to employers and recruiters is first and foremost. We talked about mobile and the ability to drive performance through mobile and deliver candidates to recruiters when they need them and where they need them. That's certainly #1. I think from an Open Web standpoint, we're going to focus on alerts and delivery and notification. And again, that's all about efficiency. There's a huge number of aggregated profiles within Open Web. Any one customer or user can only see so many profiles at one time. That's true of any service, but they can only access or use a certain number. And so delivering updates and delivering changes for them is going to be a big focus going forward, too.

The next question is a follow-up from Randy Reece with Avondale Partners.

Just real quickly, did you -- the numbers you gave for Dice.com, did that include ClearanceJobs? And if not, what did ClearanceJobs do in the quarter?

So we gave separate numbers for each, Randy, actually. So Dice.com, the revenue was down 3% year-over-year. And then ClearanceJobs was down. The revenue was down 4% year-over-year. However, they did have a second straight quarter of improved and better billings performance.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the call back over to Jennifer Bewley for any closing remarks.

Thank you for your time this morning and interest in Dice Holdings. Management will be available to answer any follow-up questions you may have. Please call me at (212) 448-4181 to be placed in the queue. Have a great day.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.