Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q1 2013 Dice Holdings, Inc. Earnings Conference Call. My name is Marie, and I'll be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded for replay purposes. And now I would like to turn the call over to Jennifer Bewley, Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications for Dice Holdings. Please proceed.

Thanks, Marie, and good morning, everyone. With me on the call today is Scot Melland, Chairman, President and CEO of Dice Holdings; along with Michael Durney, EVP of Industry Brands Group and CFO. Please note, this morning, we issued a press release describing the company's results for the first quarter of 2013. A copy of that release can be viewed on the company's website at diceholdingsinc.com. Before I hand the call over to Scot, I'd like to note that today's call include certain forward-looking statements, particularly statements regarding the future financial and operating results of the company and its businesses. These statements are based on management's current expectations or beliefs and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by the statements herein due to changes in economic, business, competitive, technological and/or regulatory factors. The principal risks that could cause our results to differ materially from our current expectations are detailed in the company's SEC filings, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K in the sections entitled Risk Factors, Forward-looking Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations. The company is under no obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required by federal securities laws. Today's call also includes certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin and free cash flow. For details on these measures, including why we use them and reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures, please refer to our earnings release and our Form 8-K that has been furnished to the SEC, both of which are available on our website. Now I'll turn the call over to Scot.

Thank you, Jennifer. First, let me welcome all of you to the Dice Holdings First Quarter 2013 Conference Call. I'll start today by briefly discussing our performance, including the progress of our Open Web beta. Then I'll hand it over to Mike Durney, our CFO, to take you through our financial performance. I'll make a few closing remarks, and then we'll open it up for some questions. Recruitment activity across our verticals has been largely stable since our last quarterly report. We continue to see relatively stronger markets in Technology and Energy recruiting compared to softer volumes in global financial services. In the first quarter, worldwide revenues totaled $50.4 million, an increase of 9% year-over-year. Excluding the acquisition of our media properties, revenues increased slightly to $46.4 million. Billings grew 5% year-over-year, due primarily to the inclusion of our Media business and strong growth at Rigzone. As for profitability, adjusted EBITDA margin was 34% of revenue or nearly $17 million per total EBITDA. Overall, Q1 was a good start to the year, particularly in light of the continued low levels of turnover in professional services, modest job growth and caution due to sequestration, especially in the government and defense sectors. More importantly, our core services are performing well, and our Open Web technology has been well received by Dice customers. Although we are in the early stages of the transformation of our services, the Open Web beta is already having a positive impact on our business. As I mentioned on our last call, Open Web is a natural language search tool that mines about 50 social sites and billions of web pages to create aggregated professional profiles of individuals. The platform brings together valuable pieces of public information scattered across the web into a useful, searchable profile containing the types…

Okay. Thanks, Scot. Good morning, everyone. For the quarter on a summary basis, revenues totaled $50.4 million, up 9% year-over-year, primarily from the inclusion of Slashdot Media acquisition. And excluding that impact, revenues were $46.4 million. Adjusted EBITDA totaled 34% of revenues to $16.9 million. And for the quarter, the Slashdot Media business generated an EBITDA loss of about $300,000. Deferred revenue increased $7.8 million in the quarter to $77.2 million. And so with that quick overview, let's go to the segments. Revenues in the Tech & Clearance segment increased 15% year-over-year to $35.8 million, which includes Slashdot Media's $4.1 million in revenue. Looking at the Dice and ClearanceJobs services, revenues increased 2% year-over-year. At the end of the quarter, Dice had 8,650 recruitment package customers, up from 8,400 at the beginning of the quarter or a net gain of 250 and returning us to our high of 2012, after the typical seasonal decline in December. The number of annual customers was essentially flat with the year-end at about 7,700. It is up ever so slightly, and the count is higher than the end of the first quarter of 2012, when we had a little less than 7,500. This continues the pattern we've been experiencing for quite some time. The number of annual customers continues to exceed the previous peaks, while the hiring managers with inconsistent tech needs or more intermittent customers have been harder to attract. During the quarter, renewal rate on annual contracts slipped a bit to 68% on roughly 2,200 customers up for renewal. When you look at the geographical differences, customers located in states like Illinois, Maryland and Washington had lower-than-average renewal rates in the quarter. These are relatively solid markets and may be a reflection of timing or last year's first quarter, which had particularly…

Thank you, Mike. As you can see, Q1 was a good start to the year. We delivered solid financial performance despite a mixed environment across our verticals. Our services are performing well, and our new Open Web technology has been well received, even though we're early on in its development. I'd like to take this opportunity to welcome, Shravan Goli to -- our new President of Dice, who joined the company in March. Shravan comes to us from InterActiveCorp, where he was CEO of Dictionary.Com. After stints at Yahoo! and Microsoft, he brings an in-depth understanding of Internet technology and digital and social media. And best of all, he's a techy. We're very excited about Shravan joining the team. So thank you all for listening. Let's open up the call for some questions.

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Jeff Silber from BMO Capital Markets.

Just wanted to focus on the income statement for a second. Your G&A costs went up pretty sizable on a year-over-year basis. Can you just give us a little bit more color of why, and is this the normalized run rate we should be using for the rest of the year?

Sure. So there's a couple things in there. So one of them is stock comp. So as I mentioned in the remarks, stock comp expense went up because we've made some grants to employees that we've taken on as part of the acquisitions, and the stock price was higher. So that's about $500,000 of the increase. And then there's a host of other things. So Slashdot Media is several hundred thousand dollars for its infrastructure. We've added a handful of officers around the world, Hong Kong, and expanded some of the other offices for Rigzone and eFinancialCareers. And we've incurred a couple other costs as part of looking at opportunities. And all that kind of adds with normal increased adds to what the base was last year. Having said all that, I think it's probably a decent run rate, maybe a little bit high, but it's a decent run rate.

Okay, great. That's helpful. And then shifting gears just to the Open Web product. I know you talked a little bit last quarter about some thoughts about pricing, and I know right now, it's included in the basic package. But do you think, eventually, this might be something you might charge clients for?

Well, I think, initially, what we did is we included it in the beta. We included that in the recruitment package because we really didn't want there to be any barrier to customers trying it and then, more importantly, using it on a regular basis and putting in into their recruitment methodology, their operations. Over time, as we deliver -- as they find value and as we deliver the value for them, there will be monetization opportunities here. This is a view-based service, so we could do something on a view basis. There's also additional services and functionality that we will be adding down the road that, potentially, are things we're going to charge for. But I really do think that is down the road. The goal right now is to get customers to try and then to have it become part of their regular usage.

Okay, great. Just a quick numbers question. What are your thoughts for capital spending for the rest of the year?

Well, I don't think our view has changed on the full year. It's a little bit front-loaded, but it's probably in the $7 million to $8 million range, the full year, not rest of the year.

And our next question comes from the line of Youssef Squali from Cantor Fitzgerald. Youssef H. Squali - Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.: A couple questions, please. Scot, during the last recession, your margins hit a high of 47% when your revenues hit a wall. This time around, your margins are almost at an all-time low, 33%, 34%, with revenues flattening out. I'm trying to understand kind of the logic of that. Is it because of increased investments to reaccelerate growth? Is it just a mix of M&A now that you have a few companies, new companies with lower margins under the umbrella? Or is it really just the competitive environment having changed? And I have a follow-up, please.

Sure, sure. So, you're right. These really aren't the typical margins that we would expect to deliver in this business, but there's really some very specific reasons why the margins are where they are today. One of the biggest impacts is just eFinancialCareers, which -- our approach there is that the business is down there, but we believe that they're recruiting in financial services. And certainly, the feedback from our customers is that their recruitment will return as things sort themselves out, so as the market sorts itself out and as regulation sorts itself out. And so we've made the conscious decision there to continue to build that infrastructure and maintain that infrastructure around the world so that when it does come back, we get the full benefit of that returning market. And so eFinancialCareers does pull down the overall margin structure of the company. The second is Slashdot Media. So it is a lower-margin business. In Q1, with some of the transition issues we had coming out of the acquisition, as Mike mentioned in his comments, in Q1, the EBITDA was very low there, lower than expected. But we expect that business to improve as we go throughout the year now because we've got new sales leadership in place, and we're beyond some of the transitional issues we had coming out of the acquisition. And then the last piece of it is really product development. So we are spending more on product development. This is -- the best way to think about this, though, is that we're investing in Open Web, we're investing in the next generation of our services. If we're right about the impact that these services are going to have, we will grow into our normalized margins. Youssef H. Squali - Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.: And then your normalized margins being what?

Back into the 40s. Youssef H. Squali - Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.: Into the 40s. So if I'd just look at your guidance for the year, it would imply that, at some point towards the back half of the year, you're already going to get back to probably the low 40s, top of margins. Is that fair, and well, is that the right math, and how do you get there?

Yes. I think the math is right. As you know, from covering us for a long time, the fourth quarter is always the highest because we tend to spend less in marketing as revenues grow during the year. So I think using fourth quarter specifically, probably, isn't the perfect analysis for this. But I think as we come out of 2013 and into 2014, we would expect to get back into that range later in 2014 or the beginning of 2015. So I think looking at individual quarters, we may get there, just like in individual quarters in the past, we exceeded 45%. But I think we're comfortable at some point with the investments we're making, all of which we believe are leverage-able in the business. And we believe the Slashdot Media business is leverage-able given that we think it's at its low point in terms of revenue. All those will contribute incremental margin that's pretty high. Youssef H. Squali - Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.: Okay. And my last question is, what was the deferred revenue growth or even the dollar amount x-acquisitions? I think last quarter, it was up about 14%, and then 11% x-acquisitions.

Yes. So from the end of December to the end of March, all of that's organic because there's really no change in the Slashdot Media deferred revenue. And Slashdot Media's deferred revenue is slightly different than the traditional recruiting businesses in terms of what generates it and how it's used. But year-over-year, the $7.5 million growth in deferred revenue, $2.5 -- no, $2.4 million is from Slashdot Media.

And our next question comes from the line of Tim McHugh from William Blair & Company. Timothy McHugh - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division: Yes, can you extrapolate a little more on the kind of integration challenges you talked about with Slashdot? And then you said you brought down your expectations for them this year. How much did you bring that down by, or I guess what are the new kind of expectations?

So first, on the -- just the challenges, when we made the acquisition back last fall, we did have some disruption of the sales team, and so we lost some of our sales leadership, we lost some of the salespeople. And as a result, you lose momentum in building the pipeline. And that impacted us a little bit in the fourth quarter, and then it hit in the first quarter. We've also -- as I mentioned, we now have a new sales leadership in place, and we've got stability in the organization. And so I think going forward, we're now going to reap the benefit of that and bring the revenue back to where we think it should be.

Yes, on the second piece, Tim, the -- it's about $2 million, full year. Timothy McHugh - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division: So does that assume, if I'm right with the math, that basically, you get back to the run rate that you had expected in the third and fourth quarters?

Yes, that is correct. Timothy McHugh - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division: And have you seen the sales performance turn around, or it -- so I guess, is it something you've seen, or is it more just based on the other changes that you described that you would expect it to start to get better?

We have some agreements that have either been executed or in the pipeline that we believe are going to impact us, especially in the second and third quarters. Timothy McHugh - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division: Okay. And then just more broadly on kind of the second half, given where the 2Q guidance you gave, it assumes a much better, at least on a year-over-year basis or kind of sequentially, excluding Slashdot, just kind of organic growth for the business. What -- can you give us a more, I guess, color on what's different, I guess, in the second half that you would expect that growth rate to pick up?

Well, I think, if you look at the Dice, the Tech & Clearance business, the Dice and CJ business, what we're expecting is that once we get further into the year, the impact of sequestration, so some of the caution around that, will be lifted, combine that with some of the impact of Open Web both on new business, as well as the impact on renewal rates due to Open Web will start to flow through in the second and third quarters.

And our next question comes from the line of Jordan Rohan from Stifel. Jordan E. Rohan - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: I know you had some commentary on eFinancialCareers in the introduction and the results, but I was hoping if you could, for those of us who aren't as close to the competitive situation there, talk about the other providers there. Do you think you're losing share, or is this really truly a macro situation there? Which countries are most significantly affected? And for that matter, how is eFinancialCareers doing in the U.S., where I believe 20%, 25% of its revenues may come from?

Sure. So, I think from the competitive environment, I would view the competitive environment of eFinancialCareers, while it varies market to market, is somewhat the same as Dice's in that there are no direct financial services providers that really stand out from a competitive standpoint. There's a number of them around, just like Dice, has a number of tech-focused ones, but the competitive environment is LinkedIn and Zing and Viadeo, that the social networks -- professional networking sites in the various markets. And it competes probably more so with recruiters, specifically, because the tendency, historically, in financial services has been to go to recruiters more so than it has been in tech. So from a pure competition standpoint, I would view it that way. You have very few direct competitors and more competition from the professional networking sites and from recruiters. If you look at the markets, so the split haven't changed very much from last quarter or the quarter before, where the U.K. is about 40%; continental Europe's about 20%; Asia, including Australia, is about 25%; and North America is about 15%. So the split, that hasn't changed very much recently. Continental Europe used to be higher, and Asia used to be lower because Asia's now grown quite a bit more. So I think when you look at the markets, the U.K. has certainly suffered, but the biggest drivers of what impacted the business in Continental Europe, specifically is France and the Benelux area, and then to a lesser extent, because they're smaller, some of the other countries. North America has performed fine. We're -- we've been expanding out the market opportunity, which has helped us a little bit, as I said earlier, in areas like wealth management, for instance. So by expanding the market opportunity, we've done pretty well, and revenues have grown a little bit year-over-year. We do suffer broadly from the global entities. The big banks that are based in the U.S., the big banks that are based in Europe, U.K., specifically when they reduced their spend because they're reducing their recruitment activity, it impacts all the regions because they look at the global deals. Not all of them, but some of them look at the global deals, and so that does have an impact in North America, does have an impact in Asia as well and certainly impacts Continental Europe.

And our next question comes from the line of Craig Huber from Huber Research Partners.

I'd be curious to hear your updated thoughts on what you see in the marketplace. With your major competitor, LinkedIn, out there, do you feel any better in terms of your positioning now versus, say, a year ago versus them?

So I mean, overall, there hasn't been much change in what's happening in the market. You got LinkedIn, which I think is really our primary competitor today. You've got Monster still with some issues, and CareerBuilder, I think, benefiting from the issues that Monster is facing. And then to round it out, Indeed and the other aggregators are picking up, I think, business in sort of low-end, low-priced segment of the market. As far as our competitive profile versus LinkedIn, I think it's improving. I think with Open Web out there now in the Dice service, we have customers that are now quite excited about being able to use Dice to reach out into the social world, and they're excited about seeing the additional information that they get from Open Web that's over and above what they can get from LinkedIn and other services. So I would say from a product perspective, we're definitely moving forward with our competitive position.

If I could also ask, are you seeing significantly different in the marketplace different in the marketplace from CareerBuilder, Monster and/or LinkedIn on the pricing side or their strategy, anything that signify change out there for them?

Really not a lot of change in the pricing front. I think maybe one thing I would add in there is that LinkedIn does have many different price points, and so customers are finding a smorgasbord of price points with LinkedIn. And then some of the other players are discounting off of their rack rates. But in general, not a big change.

And then also on your Dice.com business here in the U.S., is there any significant geographic differences worth noting, we should think about across the U.S. here?

Probably the best way to describe the way the business in the market looks right now is a little bit along customer type and then a little bit along geography. And so on the customer type side, you got large staffing firms, consulting firms, generally doing very well because, in general, companies are still leaning towards outsourcing talents to contractors, as well as staffing firms, rather than hiring full time. And then on the -- as far as geography, you got the major tech centers generally doing better than the rest of the country, with a couple of weaker areas driven by the industry influence that happens in those metro areas. So for example, the D.C. region, Northern Virginia, Maryland, D.C. region is weaker this year because of what's happening with sequestration. New York City and the greater New York area, a bit weaker because of what's going on in financial services.

Well, yes, what about what you see in Silicon Valley, I'm curious.

Silicon Valley, a very active market but a very tight market. And what's interesting is that we're still seeing people generally less willing to change jobs. So you've got turnover still at levels that are lower than what we'd expect. And so we -- even with -- if you hear about what people are saying about Silicon Valley is that it's really difficult to grab talent today. Part of that is that there's a nervousness about -- in general, about -- with tech professionals moving from one position to another.

And then my final question, on your sales and marketing line, can you just give your latest thoughts on your outlook for the top line materializes as you expect, what should we think about rather the ins and outs in the sales and marketing line in terms of like if you have a lot of flexibility there for this year? So sort of your thoughts there, please.

Yes, I think generally, we always have flexibility in sales and marketing, but as we continue down the path we're on, we think we've done the things we want to do, which, primarily, relates to what we're spending in terms of acquisition of professionals, job seekers on the Dice side. So I think the answer, Craig, is yes, we have flexibility, but we're continuing on a path.

And our next question comes from the line of Doug Arthur from Evercore Partners.

Actually, I'm good.

[Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from the line of Randle Reece from Avondale Partners.

I was wondering if you had a feel for how the tech recruiting market in the U.S. is growing, if you include unpaid recruitment advertising that would be, I guess, brought to attention via social media and search engines?

I think it's difficult to measure the unpaid part of what's going on. Overall, we do think that online recruiting, which would include LinkedIn and some of the paid social media providers, is growing in the sort of mid-single digits this year. The unpaid side of it, there are more unpaid options available today than there were several years ago. So there's definitely experimentation going on in those unpaid areas, but I wouldn't want to speculate as to how much that's really growing.

And with staffing companies, do you believe their absolute activity level is slowing down, or are they shifting their mix?

Well, I think the staffing firms in the technology space are definitely very active today, and they're seeing their businesses do pretty well. Manpower just announced a hiccup the other day, so they're having some individual issues with their business. But in general, the tech staffing world is pretty good. Was that getting to your question?

Well, I was wondering about -- if you look at your own staffing company-related business, if it was reflective of the market or if staffing companies are doing something to maybe advertise a little differently than they had in the past.

Well, I mean, each of them have their own programs that they're pursuing. They're all pursuing having a greater social media presence and building up their own brands, and so -- and that's obviously what they should be doing. I think the issue that many of the staffing firms have had historically with their own branding activities is that many of the candidates that they really want to reach are not naturally gravitating towards their brands. And so they need the third-party services to get these higher-skilled candidates that normally don't think about working for those firms.

That makes a lot of sense. I hear people in the IT staffing industry talk repeatedly about scarcity of candidates and in that being a gating factor to their growth. I guess I'm trying to reconcile, if candidates are as scarce as everyone is talking about, why isn't the IT job market as a whole growing faster than -- or let's just say the recruiting business, why isn't it growing faster? Is there really that much of a tightness? It doesn't -- it just doesn't feel like it compared with the past cycles but maybe it's skill-specific.

Well, I think the tightness is definitely there, but when you -- and this is where the turnover becomes so important. If tech professionals are nervous about switching from one opportunity to the next, then everything slows down. So it's a daisy chain of recruiting assignments that happen. If someone leaves company A, they go to company B, that creates a hole in company A, which has to be filled. In a tight market, they're going to steal somebody from company C, and that creates a hole that needs to be filled. So if there's more movement that, that creates many more recruiting assignments, and that's how the turnover really impacts recruiting.

Have you seen any of the kinds of shifts between full-time recruiting and contract-type recruiting that you would typically see in cyclical fluctuations? And what does that tell you about the market right now?

Well, at the beginning of the recovery, so going in the late 2009, 2010, we did see a shift in our job postings to more full-time positions, but that shift has been relatively -- I mean, that growth proportion has been relatively stable since. And so part of what I'm reading from that is that we haven't quite gone up -- gotten over the hump yet, or direct hiring companies haven't quite gotten over the hump yet of building up their full-time teams. And that's why I think some of the consultants and recruiting firms continue to do well.

And now I'd like to hand the call back over to the rest of presenters for any closing remarks.

Thank you for your time this morning and interest in Dice Holdings. Management will be available to answer any follow-up questions you may have. Please call Investor Relations at (212) 448-4181 or e-mail ir@dice.com to be placed in the queue. Thanks. Have a great day.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. That concludes your conference call for today. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect.