Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Donaldson Company's Fiscal Year 2013 Third Quarter Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] And as a reminder, this call is being recorded today, May 17, 2013. I would now like to turn the call over to Rich Sheffer. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Greg. Following this brief introduction, Bill Cook, our Chairman, President and CEO; and Jim Shaw, our Vice President and CFO, will review our third quarter earnings and our updated outlook for the balance of fiscal '13. Next, I need to review our Safe Harbor statement with you. Any statements in this call regarding our business that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, and our future results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements made today. Our actual results may be affected by many important factors, including risks and uncertainties identified in our press release and in our SEC filings. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Bill Cook. Bill?

Thanks, Rich, and good morning, everyone. There are 3 key messages that we're going to spend the majority of our time discussing today. And just to summarize, the first is that economic conditions are still challenging in a number of our end markets. Second, that despite these conditions, by aggressively focusing on what we can control, we are operating our company very well. A few examples of this include our record operating margin percent and our second best quarter ever for cash flow generation. And third or finally, we remain confident of our long-term growth opportunities and are continuing to execute and invest in support of our strategic growth plan. Okay, I'll begin by discussing our third quarter sales, and then Jim will discuss our operating performance, and then I'll conclude our presentation by discussing our outlook. So now talking about our sales by segment. The story in our Engine Products segment is very similar to last quarter. Conditions in our ag equipment market, especially for large farm equipment, remains strong, while our other engine OEM end markets had another weak quarter with On-Road truck sales decreasing 24% and Off-Road equipment sales decreasing 4%, both in local currency. Excluding the ag sector, many of our OEM customers continue to schedule their production levels below last year to reflect the drop-off in their end-user demand for new equipment and also to reduce their own finished good inventory levels. Among those end markets that had notable decreases were the North American and Asian heavy truck and the global construction and mining equipment markets. While some recent economic reports suggest that end-user conditions may be starting to improve in some of these markets, a number of our customers have reported that they are still working to reduce their own finished -- new finished…

Thanks, Bill, and good morning, everyone. Our gross margin was 35.8%, an increase of 50 basis points from the 35.3% in last year's third quarter. As we noted in our press release, one of the biggest drivers of the increase in gross margin were our Continuous Improvement initiatives, which benefited our gross margin by approximately 100 basis points compared to last year. Product mix also helped our gross margin with an increase in the percentage of our sales coming from replacement filters. Replacement filter sales were 52% in the current quarter compared to 50% last year. In many of our end markets, the utilization of existing equipment in the field is good, which is obviously good for our replacement filter sales. Slightly offsetting these positive drivers on our gross margin were a higher mix of GTS project sales, as well as slightly lower absorption of fixed costs due to the lower production volumes in our plants. In spite of these slightly negative year-over-year fixed costs absorption comparisons, the measures that we have implemented to aggressively control our manufacturing costs, since volumes began declining last fall, have really paid off to minimize the impact of the under-absorption of fixed costs. As part of these actions, we incurred $600,000 of restructuring costs in gross margin, which did reduce gross margin by another 10 basis points in the quarter. Our operating expenses declined by $7 million compared to last year's third quarter. The impact from our ongoing cost containment initiatives and lower incentive compensation reduced our operating expenses as a percentage of sales by 120 basis points. These cost containment actions helped offset the 90 basis of increases resulting from higher pension expense, the incremental expenses related to our Strategic Business Systems project, slightly higher insurance costs and the $500,000 of restructuring expenses.…

Thanks, Jim. We recently completed our most recent sales forecast this week, incorporating the latest data from the market and input from our key customers. It appears that the weak end market conditions that we have seen with many of our OEM customers may now just beginning to stabilize. Unfortunately, we're still not yet seeing the signs of these conditions will materially improve in any of our capital equipment-related end markets. This is disappointing that we had -- as we've previously anticipated that by now, we will be seeing signs of improvement in many of these end markets. But the general global recovery that we've all been waiting for has just been pushed out further into the future. And for us, this means at least another quarter based on what we can see today. In total, we now expect our full year fiscal '13 sales to be between $2.4 billion and $2.45 billion, down slightly from the record $2.5 billion we delivered last year. For us to be down even slightly from our prior year is unusual as we posted 21 sales records out of the past 24 years, but we have dealt with this before and we know what to do. And now I'd like to review each of our segments. Within our Engine Products segment, the recent forecasts and announcement from our key global ag equipment OEM customers suggest that their production rates in both the U.S. and Brazil will increase over last year's strong levels. However, in our other OEM equipment categories, we have not yet seen signs that our customer production rates for new construction and mining equipment or heavy trucks will improve materially before the end of our fiscal year in July. Particularly for new mining equipment, we're now expecting ongoing weak conditions through the…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question does come from the line of Kevin Maczka with BB&T Capital Markets. Kevin R. Maczka - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: I guess my first question on margins, you mentioned the quarterly records are very strong in the quarter. But it looks like the guidance, as we go into Q4, suggests a sequential decline of maybe 100 basis points or more, and it's possible also by your guidance that revenues could be higher. So can you just talk about that especially in the context of the favorable Gas Turbine mix?

Yes, Kevin, this is Jim. In terms of the guidance, as we look forward, we're anticipating similar gross margins to what we saw in this quarter. Revenues are up slightly, but from a practical standpoint, about the same. We did benefit a little bit this quarter from some adjustments to compensation-type reserves as we looked forward in terms of what the year's going to finish. That's the way they're supposed to work. And we had a couple other smaller one-times. So we do anticipate in the guidance a little bit higher operating expense, and part of that is timing of some of our investments that Bill talked about, whether it be the Strategic Systems project and other investments. So there is a little bit more OpEx forecast in Q4 versus Q3. But still, it would project out to be a very significant finish on an operating margin.

Yes, Kevin, this is Rich. I think if -- as you look at your model, we're kind of expecting the fourth quarter operating margin currently to be pretty close to last year's level, which was 15.1%. Kevin R. Maczka - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Okay. Are there further restructuring gains to be had here as we look out into Q4? Because again, it seems like the mix may be slightly positive. I understand what you're saying about some of the OpEx, comp adjustments and things like that. But are there also -- there's always Continuous Improvement, but are there also further restructuring benefits coming?

No Kevin, this is Bill. We don't comment prospectively specifically on the restructuring, but we're always looking at opportunities as the businesses continue to shift. And we're always focused on Continuous Improvement, as you mentioned. So we're not forecasting significant restructuring in the fourth quarter, and -- but we continue to look at it as we have over the last couple of years for opportunities. Kevin R. Maczka - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Okay. And Bill, can you just clarify your comment on the Gas Turbine? Looks like some of the industry orders from some of your big customers have slowed there, and you made the comment about $180 million. Was that an outlook for your fiscal '14 or the next 4 quarters?

Hey, Kevin, Bill yet. It's roughly for the -- for fiscal '14. It's probably sort of rough, rougher for both next 4 quarters and fiscal '14, around that $180 million run rate. And again, that's still a pretty good year for us in terms of Gas Turbine. But we just don't have a reoccurrence of -- we had a large number of these larger-than-usual projects in fiscal '13, which we are really grateful for, but we don't see any of those in fiscal '14. We see that there might be some out beyond that, but none of them shipping in fiscal '14. Kevin R. Maczka - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: And I think just finally on that point, you had thought at one point we were fairly early in a multiyear up cycle in Gas Turbine. Has that overriding view changed at all and this is a temporary pause? Or how would you characterize that?

Kevin, Bill again. I'd probably it in that temporary pause that you mentioned. I mean the Gas Turbine business never really sort of grows consistently year-over-year. It's sort of in fits and starts as I've looked at it over the last 20-something years. I think what's probably moderated it over the last maybe 6 months is just the back to that global economic weakness and which has sort of then tamped down the demand for more electricity power generation. So I think that's what's part of the impact again in the short term. The longer term, we still think in this country with the -- how radically the supply side of the equation has changed with natural gas and oil, but natural gas specifically and that it remains the cleanest fossil fuel that we think there's a lot of things that over the next 3 to 5 years bode very well for that industry in our business.

And our next question comes from the line of Laurence Alexander with Jefferies & Company. Laurence Alexander - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: On the new products, or the new proprietary platform wins that you mentioned, I think you said it was about $100 million, is that sort of spread out over 3 or 4 years? Or how should we think about the cadence of that?

Yes, over the next 3 to 4 years. The typical -- we win the programs usually a couple years before they actually go into production. It's when the -- our customers' engineering teams are designing their platforms or their vehicles, and that's when we get design and then win the platform. So we win them, but the launch will be out a couple of years. Laurence Alexander - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Okay. And you mentioned that you quantified how much of a tailwind the productivity efforts were. How much of a headwind to gross margins was the carryover or the drag from investing in the emerging markets?

In terms of -- could you maybe clarify that? In terms of the -- we always have an ongoing investment in the emerging markets. Are you talking about the year-over-year margin comparison? Laurence Alexander - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Exactly. I guess what I'm trying to get at is in the gross margins in particular. You've been -- or maybe on the EBIT margin level might be more useful. You've maintained a level of investment in the emerging markets despite the weaker environment. So there's going to be a drag associated with that. Just wondering if you could -- if you have any rough sense for how much that could have been?

Yes, we typically don't break that out because that's something, I think as Jim was suggesting, aren't stuff we're doing on an ongoing basis. So we -- I guess we could stop it to try and save money in the weaker environment. But we're committed to the long term to pursue the long-term growth opportunity. So we're continuing to invest in that. I mean we have some other unusual operating expenses like the increasing pension expense or the Strategic Business Systems project that we're working on. And I think we've quantified those in the past and those are again sort of in the same category. They're critical for the achievement of our long-term goals, so we're continuing to do those even though they do provide some headwind on our margins and operating expenses.

And Alexander, we don't have, like, any incremental investments in emerging markets this quarter that I would call out like at times where we open a new distribution center or capacity. So that's the things that are ongoing are more expanding sales force and those types of things that we consider more normal because they are also generating returns.

And our next question does come from the line of Charley Brady with BMO Capital Markets.

And just on the Special Apps business, can you quantify between disk drives and membrane? How much of those businesses were down?

Charley, Rich is looking up the specifics. They were both down. And as we mentioned, part of it -- the disk drive part of it, which is the larger part of that group, is due to just the weakness in global PC sales. And then the membrane products is really tight industrial markets so a lot of the price in membranes go into industrial filtration applications that we sell where we sell the material to other customers. So those are the 2 drivers. And Rich, do you want to add comment on some numbers?

Yes, Charley. Disk drive sales in local -- I'm going to give you local currency results on this. Disk drive was down between 25% and 30% in the quarter compared to last year's third quarter, where we were experiencing a rebound following the Thailand floods. The membrane business was down between 15% and 20%. So both had pretty weak quarters.

Okay. That's helpful. And if we could just switch gears back to over the Engine Products for a minute. And I guess what I'm really trying to get a better handle on is the extent of your visibility into your customers' production schedules and sort of how those discussions go as you're looking not only next quarter but maybe even beyond fiscal fourth quarter? I guess I'm trying to get more, a better sense of how far out do you guys see, how discussions go with the customers and what's your comfort level, I guess, even looking beyond the fourth quarter?

Charley, so Bill again. We're having those type of discussions on an ongoing basis. And to be fair, our customers don't have a tremendous amount of visibility. But I would say we have a pretty high level of confidence over the next 90 days, which is our fourth quarter. We track internally our backlogs, our open order backlogs and then we can extrapolate from that. The other thing is taking -- talking to our customers about what they're planning in terms of the OEM side in terms of their build rates. And that's usually pretty solid for the next 30 to 60 days. So I would say we -- our guidance on the fourth quarter, our fourth quarter, which was we didn't see a dramatic pickup on our OEM markets. Maybe unfortunately, we feel pretty confident about that because that's based on conversations in orders we can already see. But beyond that, it's probably too soon to tell. We'll be talking to our customers and later in June and July to see what they're looking at coming into the first quarter of our fiscal '14, which starts in August. But we don't really don't have much visibility out beyond 90 days for our OEM businesses.

Okay. And then just on the Gas Turbine business, the guidance you have for the year kind of implies fourth quarter of a minus 8 to a minus 17. Is that variance there just kind of on to this chunky stuff that can slip a week into the next quarter? Or what's the driving back behind the delta?

Yes, I mean we're -- our guidance says about a $50 million a quarter, and that's after the $69 million that we had in the quarter we just reported. And this -- as you mentioned, we term -- the technical terms for our Gas Turbine business by a quarter are lumpy or chunky as you put it. There's so many large project and it's really about which quarter they ship in. And as I mentioned the last 2 quarters, we had a couple of these unusually large projects. In fact, the largest project we ever shipped, the Qurayyah project. That's not sort of normal business that we see. So it's -- we love the business, but it's sort of an unusual and we don't see something like that recurring. So a $50 million fourth quarter, which we still see as a pretty good quarter in terms of sort of historically how the Gas Turbines performs.

And our next question comes from the line of Andrew Obin with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Hey, just looking at your Asia exposure and Asia contribution in the quarter, how -- Asia, you did say that you're really focused on a larger market, but Asia has been a drag. Are you seeing anything different in Asia and beyond sort of a broader macro framework? What gives you confidence that Asia is going to come back over the next 6 to 12 months?

Well, good question, Andrew. Well, we start by reading reports like you published, so that helps. As always, a little bit facetious. I think we're -- our Asian business has a couple of different maybe buckets I would put it in. I mean we have sort of our Japanese business, which was down a lot, which is very tied to the OEM On-Road and Off-Road equipment markets. And we referenced that in our guidance that, that continues to be pretty weak. We have our China business which they didn't have a -- they had a pretty good quarter all in, but it was, of course, different by end markets. We are -- we're hoping that, that's going to start to get sequentially better. I mean we take a look at customers in China like Caterpillar, who have reported that their excavator sales or production was up in the last month and that they've buried through all the inventory that they've built up last year. So I think that gives us the confidence for China. And I think that to some extent, what happens in China affects -- also can positively impact the rest of East Asia like Japan and South Korea. And then finally, the third bucket is sort of the other economies, sort of like India, which had a very good quarter in Southeast Asia, so -- which I would -- we still sort of put all those in sort of the emerging category, where our market share is low, and we have the opportunity maybe despite the economic conditions to continue to grow. So that's the way we look at Asia, Andrew. So a lot of it is driven by that whole China story. And we think that the inventories being burned off and that we're still going to start to see sequential production rates, on a sequential basis, production rates going up.

And on the U.S. just another sort of macro question. But what are you guys seeing specifically on construction-related markets in the U.S., right? Because by and large, I think the results in Q1, calendar Q1, were weak with anything construction-related. It seems like people think that we're going to accelerate in the second half of the year. But are you guys seeing things actually getting better in April and May or it's still sort of wait-and-see approach? And you've clearly stated that you think the market has bottomed.

Well, I would -- so I'll start with the punchline. We think that we're sort of in the wait and see it. It's a mixture, I think what's happening. And I'll put the construction and mining sort of together because when we look at our customers, it's hard to pull it apart. But we see the mining market as we mentioned in our comments, we see that's going to be down or stay down for probably about the rest of this calendar year. This is new equipment. We think the parts business for mining is still good. They're still running equipment. They're just spot -- not buying any new equipment. Then looking at construction, if you take a look at the nonres, that's still pretty weak. There's not a lot of uptick there. Now conversely, the residential construction is doing better. So we take a look at nonres and res construction and residential construction spending, the first one's down, the second one's up. So there's sort of a mixture and we sort of look to the guidance that customers like Caterpillar are pointing for the second -- pointing towards to the second half of the calendar year, and we try and factor that all in. And so we sort of take all those pieces and put them together.

And our next question does come from the line of Richard Eastman from Robert W. Baird. Richard C. Eastman - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Bill, just a couple -- couple of thoughts on the Off-Road business just a follow-on what you're talking about, I was surprised in the quarter in Europe, a good quarter plus like 8%, I think, in local currency. Is there any particular end market exposure there? Or is that -- then again, is that more ag-driven or...

Rick, Bill. It's ag-driven and it's we're launching a new ag emissions program actually in Europe that's helping quite a bit. So it's ag end market and a new platform we're launching. Richard C. Eastman - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. So we'll have a bigger -- we'll be a bigger participant in their emission market than we have been here in the U.S.? That can be a nice driver there?

Yes. I think we're going to be a bigger participant, yes, in the ag emissions in Europe than we are in the U.S. Yes, that's true. Richard C. Eastman - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. And then switch over to industrial. Again, in the IFS business, again, maybe a little bit surprised that Asia was weaker than Europe. And I'm curious, is there any particular exposure in Asia in IFS? Or is that just maybe a comp issue year-over-year?

Rick, probably part a comp issue. And then part is just when you take a look at sort of the Japanese industrial market and that which is down a bunch. And I talked about Japan earlier just in terms of the capital equipment-related activities in Japan are down and in China. On the China one, we're -- we believe that, that will start to improve going forward. I'm not as quite as sure as when the Japanese one will.

Yes. Rick, we had an increase in China last quarter, down a little bit this quarter. Again, it seems as a younger business that it's still a little bit more volatile versus our more established Japanese business. So I'm not reading too much into it yet because it's a one quarter. We don't think it's a trend at this point either way. Richard C. Eastman - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: And is that more dust collection or compressed air?

That'd be dust collection. Richard C. Eastman - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: It is. Okay. And then just a question, Bill, on the high purity business. Given what we're seeing maybe in the PC market and the kind of this movement towards flash versus disk drive, do you feel that this is a cyclical soft spot or is there a secular shift there? And if there is and it impacts your business, is there other areas within high purity that you're targeting to grow?

Rick, Bill. So great question. I think on the disk drive business, what we're seeing there is that a couple of factors: one is the sort of weaker global economic conditions. There are people and companies that are spending less or investing less in new PCs. And so they have fewer hard drives and fewer hard drives mean fewer filters. So that's -- we take a look at industry volumes. They've sort been stuck at around, I think, about $580 million as sort of the estimate for hard drive annually. And that's -- the forecast for this year is about the same as last year. We do not see the hard drive market growing like it has over last 10 or 15 years for because of the reason that you mentioned with the move towards tablets and smartphones, which people are using in conjunction with PCs, but they're not buying as many PCs because they're buying more of the other stuff. So I think prospectively, we think it's going to be maybe a mid- or a low-single-digit growth market. Still, not bad. That's still pretty good, but not like we saw over the last 15 years. I don't think the tablets and smartphones are going to replace hard drives because all of these devices continue to increase the need for more and more storage somewhere, whether it's in the cloud or computer rooms or whatever, and which is done best on hard drives. So whether it's digital cameras or smartphones or iPads, they create more storage needs. So hard drives are still going to be a good business. It's just not going to grow at the mid-teen rate that it approximated over the last 15 years. Richard C. Eastman - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Okay, okay. And do we have -- I mean there are a couple -- is there a couple other projects? I know we've talked about some different medical products. And is there a couple other things that we could start to maybe focus on a little bit to drive some growth in that high purity?

Thanks, Rick. That was the final part of your question, which I forgot to answer, and we are -- we've, over the last couple of years, Peggy Herrmann, who leads that combined business, has been looking at taking the capabilities that we have in disk drives for making high precision, very small filters in high volumes and where else we can use that. We're finding applications in hearing aids, some medical applications like ostomy bag, vent filters, head -- the new headlights that need breathing -- breather filters, vent filters, so again, using the same technology and the same manufacturing capabilities. That business is now about -- Rich?

Yes, it's on pace to be about $12 million to $15 million this year, up about 50% over last year.

So it's still small, but the percentage increases are high, and we see a good opportunity there to start to fill in with those higher growth rates on that smaller base, fill that in on top of the disk drive using the sort of the same technology and capabilities. Richard C. Eastman - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Okay, excellent. And then just one last question for Rich. The -- can you just tell me what the FX impact year-over-year will be now for the fiscal year? Our currency model has kind of broken down as the emphasis has shifted to the yen. We've been using the euro. I mean it still would be fractional like not more than 1% negative impact, correct?

Yes. This is Jim. That's correct. The yen has gone I guess unfavorable from a translation basis, and the euro sort of held in there. So for the full year right now through the -- we're down 10 million or 1.6% year-over-year through 3 quarters. It's probably about a 5 million or so. So it might bring it down to maybe 1% as we look at the year-over-year euro comparison is favorable, but the yen is unfavorable. Richard C. Eastman - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. So just minus 1% for the full year all in including the fourth?

Somewhere in that neighborhood, yes.

And our next question does come from the line of Stanley Elliott with Stifel, Nicolaus. Stanley S. Elliott - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Question on the Industrial Products business, within the kind of the margin section there, nice improvement. Is that more or is it strictly kind of the mix of -- from the Gas Turbine business? Or what else is going on in there?

Are -- from quarter-to-quarter? Stanley S. Elliott - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Yes, from quarter-to-quarter.

Yes, it's a combination of things. All of these cost improvement initiatives have benefited both businesses, Industrial and Engine. I think the other thing that's helped us quarter-over-quarter, as Bill mentioned last quarter, we had these very large specifically, one very large GTS or Gas Turbine project. Those very large projects, just given their nature of pass-through in terms of material content being large, do tend to sometimes skew our margins down on the first-fit. So Gas Turbines that the fills we shipped were good, good margin product projects this quarter. So that's one improvement. And then the other one is just all of the improvement initiatives that we've talked about. We did have a little bit of a positive mix first-fit versus aftermarket also with better sales of replacement filters in IFS in particular as the investment environment for industrial equipment is still challenged. Stanley S. Elliott - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Okay. When you talk about the mix impact from Gas Turbines, is there any way to kind of quantify how much of the headwind that was or will be for kind of fiscal '13 as especially as we're looking out towards '14?

Yes. For this quarter, we calculated that was about a 40-basis-point impact, and I think last quarter, it was closer to 100 basis points, so the -- And I think it was similar earlier in the year to maybe this quarter. So I'd say if you kind of average out the quarters, it's probably about a 50-basis-point to 60-basis-point type of a headwind on the company overall. Stanley S. Elliott - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then kind of switching gears to the balance sheet, cash flows are improving taking the CapEx down. What are your plans for the kind of near-term maturities that you have? Is there any thoughts on getting more aggressive with taking advantage of the very favorable debt markets out there? Or what are your thoughts generally speaking?

I think we're watching what kinds of opportunities are out there. We've, as you know, we have been somewhat quiet over the last couple of years on acquisitions, but we're continually looking. And our plan is, over time, to add 1% to 3% of our revenue growth through acquisition over time. So I think we'll probably take a cautious approach here. And to the extent other opportunities present themselves, we'll take advantage of the debt markets. But I think our current intention now would be to pay down the current maturity with our available credit line.

And our next question does come from the line of Eli Lustgarten with Longbow.

I got cut off accidentally so I -- what percentage of your business is actually mining-related?

Yes, it's between 20% and 25% of what we call Off-road. So as a total percentage of the company, it would be less than 10%, maybe about 5%.

Above your 5% business? Okay. And just on the balance sheet, so one of the things you didn't do in the quarter was buy any stock. I mean do you expect to accelerate in the fourth quarter and look out and maybe take advantage of the financial strength that you have? Or is that -- is there something else going on not to see you get to your couple of percentage share...

Eli, this is Bill. You follow us for a long time. You know we never comment prospectively on whether we're going to buy stock back. But I can say generally, our target is always to buy -- we will look at the stock repurchase in 2 pieces. The first is always to buy enough each year that options are never dilutive and that the total shares outstanding go down. And we already did that in the first half of the year. We purchased the 1.2% or about 1.8 million shares. So we already got the first one -- first part of that done and then some. And then we're opportunistic about that. Our target would be to try and reduce shares by about -- or to repurchase roughly 2% or sometimes a little bit more on a gross level. And so we take a look at that, reviewing where the stock price is and other possible uses of the cash. So we're always looking. And so we'll see what we can do in the fourth quarter when we don't make any commitments since we've already gotten the first piece done.

Now is there anything in the gross margin and operating margin improvement that would prohibit you showing normal manufacturing leverage, assuming volume picked up, as I guess you're talking fiscal '14, that would lead you -- lead us to probably higher record margins and probably better margins I think we've anticipated and we've talked about?

Yes, I think as we've gone through other downturns like this, like, say, 4 years ago, I think we saw 2 things when this has recovered and rebounded. And it really depends on sort of the slope of that rebound. Sometimes, when -- if it comes back really steeply or very aggressively, it's actually hard to ramp up to get our plants up and clean. And so I want a rebound and I'll take it in any form or fashion it comes. But I'd rather that it didn't come back -- we went from put on one pedal and then -- the break to the accelerator because that will be a little bit hard to handle. But there are some part of expenses are variable as well so some of the things that we've been controlling like travel and other expenses would come back with a rebound. Certainly, the incentive comp would come back hopefully with a rebound. So it's not -- we would get operating leverage and that's what we're striving for. That's what we've got coming out of the last -- out of the recession. I shouldn't say the last recession, the recession. And I think we'll get some out of this downturn. But it's not all upside because you have to make investments to capture that rebound as well.

And do you have -- can you give us some help with measure. We talked about you just won $100 million in the platforms and you've been -- debt comes up every couple of quarters or so. Do you have any guidance you could give us on what kind of incremental volume you can look at for '14 and '15 from new wins? And all these things are spread out, but you have some sort of a guideline on how to look at '14 and '15? Not worry about what the market's doing, but for new incremental platforms and projects that you've won recently, that would help us of what gains you would get from those...

Eli, Bill again. We have our strategic plan to grow the company into $3 billion by fiscal '16 and $5 billion in sales by fiscal '21. We finished last year, fiscal '12. We were ahead of the pace to do both of those. This year, we're coming in even a little bit less than last year. So I would say we're not off the pace. We're probably back on the pace. We still see and obviously, the exact year might be dependent on how long things remain stuck like this. But our best guess right now is that we're on track to get to the $3 billion in fiscal '16. And that $100 million in OEM programs is one example of the pieces that we're working on and that are part of getting from where we are today to there.

I understand. Bill, what I'm trying to get at is that $100 million that you just won, you said probably over 3 to 4 years. So it's $25 million a year. I'm wondering if you have a lump sum total of some of the things that you've won to say that in '14, we'll probably see $75 million or $100 million of incremental wins flow through, and that's what I'm actually looking for.

Yes, we haven't quantified that, Eli.

Right. All right. And one final question. You talked about mining being weak all year. I guess turbine but you haven't heard anything from any of your other OEM guys about any problems with improvement. I mean the truck one is probably the easiest one. We know it's down in the first. We know the production's down in the second. But there's been enough orders in trucks if the second half comparisons are very, very easy. And even if production stays flat in the second quarter, you get positive comparisons. Now we're doing construction equipment also. So I mean you haven't -- none of your OEMs have given you any guidance that things may not just work out according to the current plans, have they?

No. No, I think just talking on heavy truck and you're right there. When you take a look at the comps, they have some pretty easy comps right now. But when we take a look at some of that -- we tend to look at it more on a sequential basis that are -- and as we saw in April, Class 8 truck orders were up 6% sequentially. So those are the things that provide us with the confidence in terms of as we look at fiscal '14 that our businesses will start to improve.

And our next question does come from the line of Brian Drab with William Blair. Brian Drab - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division: Most of my questions have been answered, so I'll just be brief. But on the Engine Products side, it looks like your guidance is implying that you'll be about flat sequentially, maybe up a touch. Can you talk a little bit just directionally about the subsegments and which will be maybe up slightly, which down slightly?

Brian, Bill here. I think you're right. I think what we're seeing is some sequential improvement from the fourth -- third quarter to the fourth quarter engine. And I think that most of that improvement is driven by the aftermarket business. Brian Drab - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division: Okay, great. And then you gave statistics that I'm not sure that I gathered exactly around PowerCore. Actually, the proprietary product you said were 30% of something. Could you repeat that statistic? And then also the follow-up question is, what portion of that proprietary product is actually PowerCore?

Brian, the statistic is 30% of the first-fit air systems that we're shipping today are proprietary. PowerCore makes up 40% to 50% of that.

And our next question does come from the line of Hamzah Mazari with Crédit Suisse. Hamzah Mazari - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Bill, just a question on -- if you could just talk about how different is your visibility right now in this particular environment relative to years past? If we look at your track record, I think you've never cut guidance in about 19 years. You cut it in a downturn twice and now again. Maybe help us understand how different is this an operating environment for you guys relative to past cycles? And how is your visibility different?

Hamzah, Bill here. So this cycle is different than all the ones I've experienced in my career. And maybe all of them have been different in some ways, so maybe that's not that unusual. This certainly isn't like 4 years ago when sort of the bottom dropped out of almost everything at the same time. And what we're seeing is many of the equipment or the capital equipment related markets. So whether that's on the industrial side with dust collectors or on the engine side with On-Road and Off-Road equipment. That's just sort of stuck. People aren't willing to make those investments. The aftermarket side is more vibrant because a lot of the equipment that's out in the field is still running and is still being serviced, and filters need to be replaced. So part of what we've seen on is that on the OEM side is that our customers are waiting until like the last possible moment to provide us with the order so we have a lot less visibility, whether it's an On-Road heavy truck or construction or even ag equipment than we did, say, 15 months ago. And I would say that's really globally. So they're waiting longer until actually desperately need the product before they place the order. So we're not getting as much in the backlog and I think as I was trying to say earlier we just -- beyond 30 or 60 days, we just don't have a lot of visibility precisely around what the order levels will be. We spent a lot of time talking to our customers to try and get some sense of what they're seeing. We've -- but that's not in the numbers, just sort of like qualitatively beyond that. On the aftermarket side of our business, the replacement parts,…

Hamzah, Bill. I think the pipeline is probably about the same as it's been in the last couple years since we came out of the recession and during the recession, there just weren't really any properties. People weren't -- didn't want to sell a business during the recession because of how it was operating or what they thought they could get for it. The challenge that we've had for the last couple of years is that there's a lot of money out there looking for deals, whether it's strategic or nonstrategic buyers, and we have our financial metrics in terms of earnings accretion and ROI that we target. And so we've ended up -- we have a small team focused on it. We've ended up pursuing some deals, but not being able to close them because we couldn't justify the prices they went at. If somebody else could, that's fine, but we couldn't. I think we -- our strategy is to try and focus on smaller deals that are tend to be built-ons to our business. Smaller deals, there's more of a likelihood that we can keep it a proprietary process, pay a fair price and then it's -- it also fits our model. We're not greatly acquisitive. 2% of our revenue this year, would only total about $50 million. So they're not biased towards smaller deals and those are the ones we keep trying to pursue. We're always looking but you're right, we haven't done one in a while.

And at this time, I would now like to turn the call back over to Bill Cook for any closing comments.

Thanks, Greg. And now to conclude our call, first, I'd like to again recognize and thank all of my fellow employees for their contributions to our great operating performance. And I'd like to thank everyone on the call for your time and continued interest in our company. Thank you, all, and have a great weekend. Goodbye.

Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, that will conclude the conference for today. We do thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines at this time.