Good morning, and welcome to the DSW First Quarter 2013 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Christina Cheng, Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to DSW's first quarter conference call. Earlier today, we issued a press release detailing the results of operations for the 13-week period ending May 4, 2013. Please note that various remarks made about the future expectations, plans and prospects of the company constitute forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to various important factors, including those listed in today's press release and DSW's public filings with the SEC. Joining us today are: Mike MacDonald, President and CEO; Debbie Ferrée, Chief Merchandising Officer; and Doug Probst, Chief Financial Officer. Doug will start our prepared remarks with a short discussion of our reported results, then highlight the details of our adjusted results for the first quarter. Mike will provide more details in our operating performance and our progress this year towards achieving our long-term strategic goals. He will also provide a revised outlook for fiscal year 2013. After our prepared remarks, we will turn the floor over to Q&A. With that, I will turn the call over to Doug.

Thanks, Christina, and good morning, everyone. Our reported net income for the 13 weeks ended May 4, 2013, was $34.5 million or $0.75 per share, which includes a net charge of $11.4 million or $0.25 per share from our luxury initiative. This compares to last year's reported net income of $39.9 million or $0.89 per share, which included a net charge of $4.3 million or $0.09 per share related to our merger with RVI. Most of the $0.25 net charge from our luxury test was for an inventory reserve that we established based on our actual selling experience to date. We believe this reserve reflects more realistic expectations for selling the balance of the inventory over the remainder of the year. We were disappointed with the results from the luxury initiative, and we'll evaluate our future luxury plans in light of these results. Mike will comment more fully on luxury in his remarks. Adjusted net income in our base business was $45.9 million or $1 per share, an increase of 2% over last year's adjusted net income of $44.1 million or $0.98 per share. The balance of my comments will focus on our base business, which excludes the luxury and the RVI merger from last year. Total sales for the first quarter increased by 7.7% to $601 million, which does include $5.2 million of luxury sales with comparable sales declining by 2.4% on top of a 7.6% comp increase last year. For the DSW segment, which includes DSW.com, comps also decreased by 2.4%. As you recall, we disclosed in our last earnings call that comp sales declined by 5% in the first 6 weeks of fiscal 2013. As we move through March, the business actually weakened from that level. However, in April, we saw very healthy sales rebound that allowed…

Thanks, Doug, and good morning to everyone on the call. We increased our sales by 7.7% this quarter despite recording a negative 2.4% comp. We were disappointed with our first comp sales decline after 14 consecutive quarters of comp store growth. Much of the country experienced one of the coldest starts to spring this year, which contrasts sharply with the some of the warmest temperatures on record in the first quarter of last year. We responded very quickly and decisively to this dramatic turnaround in weather. We adjusted merchandise receipts in weather-affected categories early in the quarter. In April, we also intensified our messaging relative to assortment and value in the sandal category. These actions allowed us to minimize inventory imbalances while still supporting categories that were less weather-affected. One of DSW's strengths is its nimbleness in adjusting to changes in its business. We demonstrated that strength in Q1. When the weather opened up at the end of the quarter, all categories improved. But the weather-sensitive categories strengthen the most, probably reflecting some pent-up demand. Performance by category was mixed, again primarily as a result of weather. Comparable sales in women's footwear declined by 6%, driven by a double-digit decline in the sandal category. Bright spots within women's included the entire casual footwear segment and boots, which had a big percentage gain on a relatively small dollar base. Men's footwear continued its momentum with comparable sales growing by 8% on top of last year's 7% growth. The men's business was healthy in all classifications except for sandals. Athletic footwear recorded a comparable sales decline of 1% in the quarter. Once again, performance athletic outperformed fashion athletic. And accessories was our strongest business, posting an increase of 11% in the quarter. All subcategories contributed to this excellent performance. Finally, sales of…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Scott Krasik with BB&T Capital Markets. Scott D. Krasik - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Just a quick one on the luxury. Is the $5.25 million that you're calling out and the $10-x million of net income, is that just the apparel piece? Or does that include some footwear as well?

That includes the whole luxury piece, both Luxe810, which is the website piece, and the apparel that we tried to sell throughout those 5 pop-up stores. Scott D. Krasik - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Okay. So for lack of a better word, we're trying to, in essence, make it appear like we're trying to put it apples-to-apples like the Luxe810 never happened. Is that right?

Yes. Scott D. Krasik - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Okay. That's easy enough. And then just in terms of your outlook, your visibility in terms of some of the seasonal categories, even though you're very clean on inventory, are you assuming that the industry overall is going to be very promotional? And then because you don't have a back-to-school business and others really do, are you planning your inventory receipts or business differently in the second quarter than others, who are expecting a big benefit in Q2? Deborah L. Ferrée: Scott, this is Debbie. I'll take that question for you. First of all, we're not a promotional business. What we did through the downturn in sandals, which was down 15% comp for the quarter, what we did is we managed receipts, number one, by matching the inventories or the receipts to what we thought the sales plan would be. And number two, as you saw in mid-April, what we did is we took a really sharp price point that we had, $39.95 and under, and we simply marketed or communicated to our customer that we have some really sharp values in the assortment. But we didn't take promotional markdowns to really get there. We really just communicated the strength of our value proposition. And actually on that group of styles that we marketed, actually when you look at a 9-month point of view, we came out better or we're projecting that we come out better in margin than had we done nothing with those shoes in terms of promoting them. So I would tell you we just did what we always do. We managed receipts and we talked about our value proposition. As far as Q2 is concerned, I see some additional upside that we typically would not go…

Scott, not at this point. I would hesitate to throw out a number on the call. But let us do a little homework on that and try to frame that up.

Our next question comes from Jeff Van Sinderen with B. Riley.

Just wanted to follow up on the weather situation. Any other color you can give us on what you saw in the colder markets versus the warmer markets? And then maybe you can give us more color on what you've seen since the weather has broken in the last -- well, I guess, since the last month of the quarter.

Sure. Well, there really weren't -- a year ago, there really weren't very many temperate parts of the country. It was pretty much record warm temperatures throughout the entire first quarter, every place except around the West Coast. This year, most of the country was cooler than normal. And they keep these records, these weather records on averages for the last 118 years. And they rank each state in the country, and then they regionalize the states. And I think there was a change, year-over-year change on average of about 60 places in terms of the ranking from 1 to 118. So it was a dramatic turnaround. And it affected virtually the entire country, less so in the South and even less than that in the West. But in terms of the Northeast, the Mid-Atlantic and the Midwest, it was a dramatic turnabout. And our weather reflected that as it happened. We joked internally and we said that the calendar was literally 4 or 5 weeks late. And the business we got in March, we should've -- or in April, we should've been getting in March. And that's literally how it worked out. As Doug said in his remarks, the business actually got a little weaker as we moved into March. And it was on the basis of the strength of the rebound in April that we were able to come out with a negative 2% comp. So as tough as it was early, it was strong late. And we finally got some consistent warm weather and all areas in the business jumped up. But of course, the sandal and all opened-up footwear, even some of the athletic businesses that are weather-dependent, jumped up more than the average. So we are pleased with the way the business rebounded and we're continuing to monitor the business. We think there's still some pent-up demand out there. And I think it's going to be a while before we really discern our underlying sales trend. And so in terms of managing the business, we're still trying to be prudent on our expenses and careful on our inventory management. And we know that when we do that, we make more money if the business turns up and we minimize any downside if the business turns down. So I feel like we did a fantastic job of managing through a very volatile time period in terms of weather and sales. And I feel like we're positioned exceptionally well as we start the second quarter with actually some wind in our sails because of the strength of April.

Okay. And is it fair to say that you feel like your inventory at this point is clean?

Yes.

Our next question comes from David Mann with Johnson Rice. David M. Mann - Johnson Rice & Company, L.L.C., Research Division: Just following up on inventory, can you just elaborate, when you're talking about the quality and composition, how you feel like you stand in terms of sandals and open-toe inventory versus other and where you are in terms of clearance levels this year versus last, when you had some issues as well?

I think 3 things. One, our inventory per square foot is down 5%. I think it's down about 4% if you adjust for the 1-week shift in the calendar. So on any basis, it's in good shape totally. Our clearance ownership in terms of units per average store and in terms of its penetration to our total ownership is down year-over-year meaningfully. And in terms of our sandal inventory, we're in good shape to do business and we project coming out at the end of the quarter exactly where we want to be. So really, it's as simple as that, David. David M. Mann - Johnson Rice & Company, L.L.C., Research Division: And for the follow-up, Doug, when we think about the margin compare versus last year, I mean, obviously you accelerated some markdowns and took a big hit in merchandise margin. How do we think about the type of markdowns you're doing in the second quarter, promotional markdowns in terms of the opportunity you might have to recoup versus last year?

I think Doug is going to probably to talk about this. But last year, in the scheme of things over a multiyear period, it was a pretty good quarter in terms of margin performance. So that's number one. Number two, I think we're cleaner going into Q2 than we were a year ago. And number three, if you think about what happened to us in Q1 with an unfavorable mix, sales mix by category, we had, what, 6% comp decline in women's and an 8% comp increase in men's. And men's has a lower margin rate than women's. If you subscribe to the theory that there's still some pent-up demand out there such that women's can outpace men's in Q2, that mix that worked against us in Q1 could possibly work in our favor in Q2.

And David, I would just add to that is that, as you know, second and fourth quarters are our clearance periods to make sure our inventories are in line for the upcoming season. So as Mike also mentioned that our sales trends are going to be difficult to perfectly predict until we get a little settling in as to how much sales may have shifted, I would be hesitant to predict a merchandise margin rate at this stage. But I can assure you our inventories are going to be at the right spot as we open up the fall season and we'll do what it takes to get them there. And fortunately, with our balances at the end of first quarter, we're going into it in a good position.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Kate McShane with Citigroup.

My question, just around what your price expectations are for the rest of the year in terms of average selling price contributing to that flat to 2% growth comp guidance you gave today.

I'm sorry, we couldn't understand your question very well. We couldn't hear it. Could you repeat that, please?

I'm sorry, I was wondering if you could tell us what your average selling price expectation is for the rest of the year within that 0% to 2% comp guidance.

Average selling price, as we mentioned, the first quarter, we have a little bit of benefit from the -- we'll talk to average unit retail. They were slightly positive, which we were proud of, and it also gives an indication that we didn't have to be overly promotional to get what we -- get our inventory levels are. So I would say at being a slight, very slight contributor to our 0% to 2% comp expectation.

Okay, great. And for my follow-up question, I know one of the first question was around luxury business. How should we think about your view on the luxury category moving forward?

As I tried to say in the prepared remarks, Kate, we need 2 or 3 things to happen. And we'll be working with our purchasing agent to assess this. We need to buy the product in the right kind of mix. That is in terms of closeout, make-up and in-line. And we need very importantly to buy it in quantities that we're able to really absorb and sell-through at a reasonable rate so that we can provide fresh flow and our assortment doesn't get stale. And then the most important thing is we have to buy it at costs that we can margin out, so at a level that we can cover our operating expenses and breakeven. And that's going to mean that probably we're going to have to buy it a little sharper that we have in the past. But we need all 3 of those things to be in place for us to continue the luxury initiative. The reasons why we're willing to breakeven on this business are several. Number one, luxury represents a point of differentiation for DSW versus any relevant competitor. Two, it gives us a chance to broaden our customer base. Three, we think it helps us to solidify our image as a fashion leader. And it provides a price umbrella under which customers sometimes feel more comfortable about buying the next level down in terms of price points. And the most important, perhaps, reason why luxury makes sense for us and even at a breakeven level is because we think that by selling luxury product, we advance ourselves in conversations with other better and prestige brands, who today don't sell us. And those are all the reasons why we're willing to operate the business on a breakeven because we think those nonfinancial factors are important and they can help us advance the business. And ultimately, those nonfinancial factors turn into financial factors. So hopefully, that gives you a sense for how we're thinking about luxury going forward.

Our next question comes from Sam Poser with Sterne Agee. Sam Poser - Sterne Agee & Leach Inc., Research Division: I have a couple, please. Could you tell us -- number one, could you just walk through what the tax rate for the quarter and how to think about that? Because it seems like it's actually significantly lower than it was last year.

Yes. I would assume about a little less than the 39% rate for the year. There is some volatility in that by quarter based on the accounting. But I would say it would slightly increase as we get through the year, but end up a little just shy of 39% for the year. Sam Poser - Sterne Agee & Leach Inc., Research Division: I'm talking about in the first quarter. Can you walk through that, please?

At the risk of getting into detailed tax conversation, a lot of it has to do with the timing of credits in that first quarter. So I can follow up with you in more detail, but that would be the primary reason. Sam Poser - Sterne Agee & Leach Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then my second question is just in regards -- look, I'm sorry, I probably lost my question. Let me come back on, and I'll follow up in a sec.

Our next question comes from Camilo Lyon with Canaccord Genuity.

Doug, I was hoping you could give us an update on your expense reduction plans that you had outlined, intending to pursue last quarter, where we stand now, what the opportunity is going forward for the balance of the year.

Actually, it's going very well. The team at DSW at large has really come together to figure out what are good reductions we could make without sacrificing the long-term growth of the business. So honestly, the first quarter was less to do about some of these changes. We'll see those changes in the -- mostly in the second and third quarter as it relates to the SG&A rate. It'd be difficult to leverage that fourth quarter rate because we had an extra week of sales last year. But we've advanced the ball significantly. I want to restate that we haven't taken long-term damaging-type cuts. And it's mainly through the timing of when we're bringing on some people, some professional fees, travel, every little piece we looked at to be as efficient as we can in what obviously was a challenging start to the year. So we had anticipated a leverage in SG&A this year primarily due to the preopening expenses being reduced by about $8 million. But as we stated in the call, home office leverage can be achieved certainly as we're growing the sales line by about 7%. So we're pleased. And we're never done, but we're thinking we're making good progress.

And am I correct in assuming that, that's embedded in your current outlook?

Yes.

Okay, great. And then just a clarification question on the Q1 comp that was reported. What is that comp, excluding the luxury sales?

Negative 2.0%.

Our next question comes from Chris Svezia with Susquehanna Financial.

I have a couple just clarifying questions here. I guess, first, Doug, for you. Could you just tell me what the -- go over again what the gross margin rate was for the first quarter on a non-GAAP basis.

On a non-GAAP basis, the gross profit was 33.5% versus last years of 34.8%. And again, that excludes the luxury business altogether.

So can I ask you -- I'm just a little confused, I'm getting a different number. So you're excluding all -- so using revenues of $596 million and a gross -- and a cost of sales of $402 million to get there, what am I -- I'm just kind of -- I'm getting a different number, that's why I'm just curious what I'm missing.

Well, we pulled out the luxury business that we had in our business last year, so which is mainly store and a little bit of dot-com business so that may be the reconciling item that you're thinking of. So last year's actual rate reported 34.5%. That's a little higher when you exclude the luxury business, the little bit we had last year.

Okay. I'll circle back with you on that. And just -- I know Sam was asking this about. Can you just tell us what the tax rate was in Q1 on a non-GAAP basis, what that rate was?

I'm sorry, can you just repeat again?

Yes. Can you just tell us what the tax rate was on a non-GAAP basis for Q1? I mean, it looks like 32%. I mean, is it fair to say that you're able to use the tax deductibility of the luxury piece against ordinary income? Or I'm just trying to clarify that for a sec.

The tax rate base-to-base is about 37.2%. So hopefully that helps reconcile you, and that's last year. I'm sorry, 37.2% this year, but that base-to-base. So the comparison would be the number that was reported.

Okay. Separately, I'm just curious, in April when you said the business improved with the weather, how did traffic -- how were the traffic trends in April? Did they turn positive as well?

Traffic was significantly better in the month of April. We still had -- it was not -- our comp increase was not all traffic-driven. It was still partially due to strong conversion. So we were working on traffic. Traffic should be a little stronger than it is right now. And I think that we've heard that phenomenon from other retailers as well. So we've been trying to understand that. We know that a lot of it was weather-driven. We're a little concerned that not all of it is weather-driven. And so we're looking at all of our metrics. And we've got a few changes that we'll make in the fall season to address that.

And I'd like to interject. I want to respond to another question to make sure it's clear. The negative 2.4% comp that we talked about was excluding the luxury business. I jumped too quick to the answer. It would be negative 2.0% if we did include the luxury business because there were some favorable sales. So I apologize for maybe temporarily misleading you. So negative 2.0% if you included the lux business, negative 2.4% if you excluded it.

Okay. And then just on -- Doug, for you, just on the gross margin and how we think about that for the year. I know part of that is product margin. Any color in terms of deciphering how we think about product margin, how do we think about occupancy cost for the balance of the year based on your flat to up 2% comp?

Well, unfortunately on that level of comp, we'd be unlikely to leverage occupancy. We'd expected to get a little deleverage on that, obviously closer to leverage if we get it to the 2%. But in the middle, it would be a little deleverage on occupancy. From a merchandise margin rate, it could get pretty close to flat to last year. Again, a lot is going to be determined with how much fuel we have to use during the markdown periods of the second and fourth quarter, which again last year is 44.9% margin rate from a merchandise standpoint was pretty good. And the 0% to 2%, to get close to that, we'd be pretty pleased.

Okay. And lastly, just, Debbie, for you, just on the athletic business, kind of how you're thinking about that. I'm sure that improved as you guys came through April. But just your thoughts on your initiatives on the athletic business and just general thoughts to go through the balance of the year. Deborah L. Ferrée: Sure. So Chris, we actually -- running for us is still the strongest category, and we actually saw a significant increase in penetration in running. We're starting to see cross-training come on quite strongly and that's comping quite large, double-digits. And the whole fashion piece, the street piece with some of the key items from Skechers, the GOwalk, things like that, that's starting to come on very strong as well. So I'm very pleased with our athletic business. We've got it positioned well both in terms of content and inventory going into back-to-school and quite liquid in inventory. And so I think we're in a really good place in athletic.

Our next question comes from Seth Sigman with Credit Suisse. Seth Sigman - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Just a question on the comps guidance. It looks like you took it up slightly for the year. I think previously you discussed flat comps maybe for the second half of the year. Have the actual assumptions changed at all for the back half or still kind of planning conservatively at this point?

I think when we mentioned flat comps, we didn't endorse that as a piece of guidance. We just said what the first -- I think that's the time the first 6 weeks of the year was down 5%. And we felt like it was mostly weather that was hurting our business. So what we did, we said if we were to be flat for the year, then this is the kind of earnings performance you could expect out of us. And maybe we were being a little cute, but we were trying not to give guidance but trying to be informative. And so there's really no basis to compare against. I think if you do the math with our 2.4% negative comp in Q1, if we did between 1% and 3.5% over the balance of the year, so Q2, 3 and 4, that would get you to a flat to plus 2% comp. So we hope that, that's appropriately conservative and that's how we're managing our receipts right now. Seth Sigman - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Yes. All right. Fair enough. And then you mentioned the improvement in conversion helping support comps this quarter. I mean, it seemed like implied, it was a nice benefit from that. Was there a change in trends in conversion versus maybe prior periods? And I mean, clearly you have a lot of ongoing system initiatives. Can you maybe elaborate on what's helping drive that conversion at this point?

Yes. The upturn in conversion was significant. And traditionally, we have always interpreted higher conversion to be an endorsement of our assortment and an indication that we're doing a good job for the customer interacting at store level. I think your point about disappointing fewer customers and having more of the right sizes as a result of size optimization, it's directionally valid. Statistically, I can't really tell you how much that was in Q1, but I know that it helped a little bit. So to answer your question directly, the conversion increase was significant and it was much different than what we had been running, so we were pleased with it.

Our next question comes from Mark Montagna with Avondale Partners.

So it sounds like you performed quite well the last 4 weeks of the quarter. Is it fair to say that, that same pace of strength has continued at that rate through quarter-to-date right here in the second quarter?

We learned our lesson in the first quarter, Mark, to not over-project on the first few weeks of the quarter. So we can tell you that obviously April got better from our results. And as weather improved, so did our performance. So you can read into that to that extent. But we're careful not to extrapolate off of earlier results of May because similar in a reverse way though to last year, where we don't know how much has been pulled forward or pushed back as far as the business trends, so we'd be reluctant to go there. And I think our 0% to 2% comps kind of use historical averages from this period of time as we're managing the business. So we don't want to get in that habit of giving that kind of short-term performance, but we think that's the prudent thing to do at this time.

Okay. Yes, that makes sense. And then just last year when -- can you give us an idea as to what the cadence of comps was last year through the second quarter? Because it sounded like it may have weakened as the quarter progressed last year.

Yes. I suppose we could give you that. But again, the patterns of comps in the second quarter, because it is a clearance period, can get pretty subtle as well because when we rotate our merchandise, for example, that is a timing that could overlap a May and a June. So I wouldn't put too much credibility or credence in the patterns of sales with that kind of performance by month. But if I look back at it, it's not terribly different by month last year.

Okay. And then just lastly, a quick question. In terms of fashion athletic versus performance athletic, can you help us understand how that breaks down in terms of importance, what percent within athletic is fashion versus performance?

About 2/3 performance and 1/3 fashion.

Our next question comes from Jane Thorn Leeson with KeyBanc.

My question was on the luxury. What areas of the luxury test, if you could get more granular, didn't perform as well?

Okay. Well, there were 2 parts of the luxury business. There was the footwear and accessories part that was carried in a handful of our stores. But predominantly, it was a DSW.com business and we bannered it under the Luxe810 logo. And if you go to our website, you can see that the Luxe810 is a separate tab there. And when you open that tab and you go in there, you can see that it has different creative. The images are larger, the prices are actually hidden. And so that was the primary thrust of our luxury test. The sell-through on that were reasonable when we discounted deeply. They were slow when we had less deep discounts. The other thing I'd say is that the luxury test could only have been successful if we were to attract a great, many new customers to DSW. And that's how we tried to pursue the business. What we found is that the cost of attracting new luxury customers to the DSW website were very much higher than we had anticipated in relation to the sales that were generated through those efforts. So it was kind of a situation where unless we spend wildly on attracting new customers or we discount deeply in order to move the product, we just can't get adequate sell-through given the quantities that we own. So that's the Luxe810 portion. The other piece, which was a nonstrategic piece but it was part of what we needed to take in, in order to get the significant footwear and accessories piece, was feminine apparel. And we agreed to take that and as a part of the total cost of the deal. And our first attempt was to liquidate that product through pop-up stores in high-profile locations, 5 high-profile locations throughout the country. And as we commented on last earnings call, the early results of those pop-up stores was not good. And that continued for the full month that those pop-up stores were open. And so whereas we had thought that we would continue to open up additional pop-up stores over the balance of the year based on our experience in first 5 pop-up stores, we changed our approach and we're now pursuing that, the final liquidation of that product, not through retail efforts but through wholesale efforts. So I hope that explains. We never had an intention to pursue apparel in the luxury sector as a go-forward part of the business. It was sort of a purchase with purchase, if you will.

Okay. That's really helpful. The follow-up to that is what -- how exactly were you trying to attract new customers? What was the biggest, most expensive piece of that?

It's really affiliate marketing because it's primarily a dot-com business.

We have a follow-up question with Sam Poser from Sterne Agee. Sam Poser - Sterne Agee & Leach Inc., Research Division: One of them was answered. But I've been getting a lot of calls from a lot of investors saying, asking more details on this tax rate because nobody can get to 37%, including myself for the quarter. If you could walk through the adjusted margin SG&A and taxes so we can all know the numbers, it would help, I think, everybody.

Okay. If I can walk you through the dollar per share on an adjusted basis and the key numbers to consider are the gross profit rate of 33.5%, an SG&A rate of 21.3% for an operating income rate of 12.2% and a tax rate of 37.2%. Sam Poser - Sterne Agee & Leach Inc., Research Division: And that's off of the adjusted sales number, taking these sales out or out of the $601 million?

That's out of sales -- it's right. The reduced sales of $596 million. And I would like to point people to, there's a reconciliation at the back of the press release that at least gives you some of those components from gross margin and operating expenses on a dollar and EPS basis. Sam Poser - Sterne Agee & Leach Inc., Research Division: And then lastly, given what you're doing with the inventory and so on, Debbie, is this going to give you -- assuming that the trends stay strong, does this give you the opportunity to chase key items going forward both in second quarter and beyond? Deborah L. Ferrée: Yes. Sam, we do that as a normal business practice anyway. So I would tell you that our inventories are in a place that will allow us to maximize key items. If we decide to accelerate those and pull those forward, as you know, we have big key items kind of planned out throughout the season that will also give us the opportunity to maximize things that we don't know about right now by chasing them through reorders. So yes on both notes.

I'm showing no further questions. This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to the company CEO, Mike MacDonald, for any closing remarks.

Thanks very much. As usual, Christina and Doug are going to be available to answer any follow-up questions throughout the day. And we certainly appreciate your interest in DSW and your participation in the call today. Hopefully, from today's interaction, you get the sense that we're excited about DSW and our prospects for continued success in market share gain. So thanks again for your participation. Have a great day.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.