Good morning, and welcome to Dana Incorporated’s Third Quarter 2023 Financial Webcast and Conference Call. My name is Chris, and I’ll be your conference facilitator. Please be advised that our meeting today, both the speakers’ remarks and the Q&A session will be recorded for replay purposes. For those participants who would like to access the call from the webcast, please reference the URL on our website and sign in as a guest. There will be a question-and-answer period after the speakers’ remarks and we will take questions from the telephone only. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to begin the presentation by turning the call over to Dana’s Senior Director of Investor Relations and Strategic Planning, Craig Barber. Please go ahead, Mr. Barber.

Thank you, Chris and good morning everyone on the call. Thanks for joining us today for our third quarter 2023 earnings call. You will find this morning’s press release and presentation are now posted on our investor website. Today’s call is being recorded and the supporting materials are the property of Dana Incorporated. They may not be recorded copied or rebroadcast without our written consent. Allow me to remind you that today’s presentation includes forward-looking statements about our expectations for Dana’s future performance. Actual results could differ from those suggested by our comments today. Additional information about the factors that could affect future results are summarized in our Safe Harbor statement found in our public filings, including our reports with the SEC. On the call this morning are Jim Kamsickas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Timothy Kraus, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. My pleasure to turn the call over to Jim. Jim?

Good morning. And thank you for joining us today. First, please turn with me to page 4 where I will discuss our highlights for the third quarter of 2023. Starting on the left side, we're pleased to report the Dana achieved robust third quarter sales of $2.7 billion, a $134 million increase over the same period last year driven by continued strong customer demand, the rollout of our new business backlogs across all of our end markets including EV programs and our ongoing cost recovery efforts. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $242 million, up $50 million or 150 basis points over the third quarter of last year driven by a strong operational execution and improved efficiency. This is a tremendous accomplishment given the uncertainty the light vehicle market faced in the quarter. Free cash flow was a use of $5 million for the quarter, which is reflective of the higher seasonal working capital requirements to support our aggressive launch scheduled this year. Lastly, our results, adjusted earnings per share for the year, were $0.30, an improvement of $0.06 per share. Dana continues to execute well across our operations despite the impact of the UAW strike on our light vehicle North America business late in the quarter. The structural profitability improvements of the business are very much the product of the entire Dana team, progressively overcoming the 2020 to 2022 onrush COVID related costs that we had endured over the past few years. As you've witnessed throughout the first three quarters of the year, we have systematically implemented the core tenant of our enterprise strategy, that is, what we refer to as leverage the core. What this means is that we have driven standardization and transformational change across the entire organization. While achieving countless improvements across the business, we are…

Thank you, Jim. Good morning. Please turn to slide nine for a look at Dana's third quarter 2023 results. Sales were $2.67 billion, $134 million increase over last year, primarily driven by strong demand across all our segments, recoveries of cost inflation, and favorable currency translation partially offset by lower demand due to the UAW strike. Adjusted EBITDA was $242 million for a margin of 9.1%, an increase of $50 million and 150 basis points over last year's third quarter. Our profit improvement was driven by lower net manufacturing costs, beneficial mix, and better operating efficiencies resulting from strong operational execution. Net income attributable to Dana was $19 million compared with a loss of $88 million last year. The net loss last year was due to a non-cash goodwill impairment charge. Diluted adjusted earnings per share was $0.30, a $0.06 improvement over the third quarter of last year. Lastly, free cash flow was a use of $5 million, down $82 million from last year, driven primarily by higher working capital requirements to support our program launch cadence and higher capital spending. Please turn with me now to slide 10 for a closer look at the drivers of sales and profit change for the third quarter of 2023. Beginning on the left, traditional organic sales growth of $20 million was driven by higher demand and improved pricing, partially offset by the impact of the UAW strike on our light vehicle business. Adjusted EBITDA on higher sales was $35 million, which improved margins by 130 basis points. Cost inflation was partially offset by customer recoveries in the quarter, resulting in net inflation headwinds of about $14 million. Improved operational execution, beneficial mix, and fewer inefficiencies driven by less volatile customer production patterns was the primary driver of profit improvement in the quarter.…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Noah Kaye with Oppenheimer. Your line is open.

Thanks for taking the questions and appreciate the range of scenarios provided. I actually want to pick up on one of Tim's last comments. Can you speak to what you're doing to support the health of your suppliers amid all going on over the last several weeks? How that has impacted cash conversion expectations for 4Q and what you would call out in terms of potentially that improving as we get into 2024?

Sure. The impacts on suppliers are both related to the specific UAW actions as well as actions that have happened previously. We have one particular supplier that's been of particular concern and we've been providing significant support to that supplier. So we expect to continue to have some of that into the fourth quarter. Then we will obviously do what we need to to make sure that as we go through the restart, we're able to support the supply base and make sure we can deliver for our customers.

And just I didn't catch it. You can possibly quantify that or dimension the impact that it's having on cash flow?

So the impact is in Q4. We don't expect it to be significant, but it's difficult to mention at this point as we know what the restart is going to be.

Okay. So the free cash flow conventions are headwinds are largely around the inventory bill that you've been having. Based off of the news flow that we've seen, it sounds like four workers for super duty, and other programs that are important to you are being asked to return. And so that may be a fairly near term event. Can you just talk about your capacity to ramp back up at some of these programs, your state of revenue and what you expect will happen as those programs start back up again?

Hey, good morning, Noah. Thanks for joining. Thanks for the question. This is Jim. I think the best way maybe to think about it is it's, the audience is, it's almost like the COVID shutdown timeframe. I mean, any sophisticated manufacturing company had a playbook to kind of wind it down and also had one to wind it up as part of that. It's kind of the whole chain. Part of it's the whole supply base and what we're doing there, ensuring make sure that supply base has the raw material, has the labor availability, so on and so forth. Internal operations are very much within our control and making sure there that we have inventory in place. We have soft, safe launch quality programs in place because you may have some new operators or operators that have to move around to different jobs or whatever the case may be. But from a standpoint, from our line of sight, our ability to come up will be, should not be a difficulty. We've ran this play before. So I hope that answers your question. But as soon as they're ready, we're just hopeful. It's still a tentative, we all understand that. It's still a tentative agreement. So hopefully we're moving and we're producing product back to where we were a few weeks back.

That's helpful. Thanks, Jim. Last question from me. There's some mixed message out of the light vehicle industry around the pace of EV investments. But of course, the majority of your programs to date have been in CV and off highway. Can you speak to the pace of EV investments and RFP activity that you're seeing currently in those markets and your expectations for future awards activity related to electrification?

Yes. Again, thanks for the question. The way I think about it is it almost starts with when we have, I would say, a very equal balance in terms of, depending on if you put it on a revenue level of electrification wins across all of the end markets that we participate. Maybe we could dimension it differently or better in the future, but really good balance across all the end markets. So the way we've designed the company, most important part, when we put complete in-house electrodynamic capability across the company, it was not with one end market, i.e. light vehicle centric, or it wasn't like one geographical market, like North America centric. It was to basically be able to scale our products, our processes, and our human capital across all of the respective end markets. So what am I getting at here? Yes, we can see that there may be some push out in some geographical markets or maybe some push out in some end markets like vehicle, commercial vehicle, whatever. But that isn't how we've designed the company. We scale our products as basically high torque, truck related products, truck and large vehicle products. So as the volume comes on, we're able to flex with that and only go up the curve on our spending as that comes. So not too worried about that. That's just how it works. Our light vehicle products work over in our commercial vehicle, commercial vehicle products work over in our highways, what I'm basically getting at. So in the punchline relative to new wins and so on and so forth, not here to announce anything. We've sprinkled the infield, as I like to say, throughout the course of the year. At the beginning of next year in February, we'll give you that standard backlog update and some new updates for you.

Okay, looking forward to it. Thank you.

Thank you.

The next question is from Colin Langan with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Oh, great. Thanks for taking my questions. I appreciate the guidance. But any color on the low end, can you clarify whether that's with Ford strike ending or is that just assuming what was happening a couple of days ago continue to the end of the year? And any color on sort of the sales drag, if it's just GM and Solanas [Ph], how much like per week or something that, we should be kind of estimating? There is a good sort of guidepost.

Sure. Hey, Colin thanks for the question. So our low end assumes that Ford would be out through the end of the year based on, before the announcement of the tentative agreement. So it's a fully down scenario. And if you want to think about it, right, the way to kind of dimension it, I think we're not going to give specifics, but about half of that changes is probably Ford. The balance is everything else.

And any color on like a weekly pace of the balance at this point? I mean, Ford's over. So is it going to be 15?

All right, I think you could probably you can you can work through it. I think about the low and the high end. If it's about a half a million dollars, half of it's Ford. You can sort of figure out how you dimension it.

Okay, all right.

And of course, it always depends on some of it depends on the restart to in terms of Ford. So, how quickly they come up and which plants come up when.

Yes, that makes sense. If I look at the guidance and I look at the high end and I think about what's implied in Q4, it does imply and I feel like I'm nitpicking because it's look like pretty good guidance given all the strike issues. But if I go quarter-over-quarter, sales actually still at the high end look pretty flat. But EBIT falls off a bit, almost 80 million or so at the high end. What would drive that? Is there seasonal issues? Is that just sort of abnormal sort of drag from the strike? Why the big margin drop into Q4?

So our Q4 margins are generally lower. I mean, we just have a lot of down production days in the fourth quarter when you think about between the Christmas shutdown and Thanksgiving here in the States just makes the the absorption on the fixed costs a little bit harder when you think about it. So it's definitely seasonality as you kind of go through that.

Got it. If I could just squeeze one more in. I think in your last presentation, you indicated sort of a 50 million full year inflation drag and a 20 million EV investment drag. Are those still the right numbers? Have they changed at all?

Yes, inflation on a net basis has moderated a little bit, but nothing significant. We're seeing a little bit lower overall EV investment. You saw that sort of in the quarter. We call out some of its deferral, but we are as we as we start to ramp these programs. We're getting much more efficient and better as we as we time and bring on resources, getting them up to speed and getting them really productive faster. So there's some efficiency built into that as well.

Great. All right. Thanks for taking my question.

The next question is from Dan Levy with Barclays. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning. Thank you. Just wanted to follow up on Colin's line of questions, but maybe just a slightly different approach. Just if I'm looking at you, you're saying the upper end of your guide is equal to the midpoint of your prior guide, but that has within that, $250 million of revenue impact, at a 20% decremental, so that's 50 million EBITDA, but you're still holding the guide. So specifically, what is better, at least at the upper end of your guide that is offsetting the UAW headwinds that you've incurred so far? Is it the thing, inflation is sort of a neutral, somewhat moderated? Is it EV that's holding in better?

So it's a couple of things. Number one, we continue to deliver and get the operational efficiencies back into the business. You saw that in Q2 and accelerated into Q3. So when you think about both from an operating and cost performance perspective, we're seeing that flow through the business. We're also, continuing to see good work from a commercial recovery perspective around margin improvement, and then, the work that the teams continue to do on managed spend. So all of those really core things that drive increased conversion, we're seeing come through the business. And then, like I said, while inflation is net neutral or maybe a little better, we're but generally that's the big driver as to why we're not seeing or able to cover some of the downside from the strike.

Right. Thank you. And then just as far as, and I recognize you'll give a guide on 2024, on the 4th you call, but just conceptually as we're looking into next year, is it fair to say that there's more runway on flowing through these business efficiencies, maybe some inflation unwinds starting to hit, are those fair tailwinds to consider into 2024?

Yes, I mean, obviously we'll give guidance, we'll update guidance in February and we're watching all of those factors pretty closely. Obviously as we get through the restart and we get a better feel for how the customers are going to run and what the outlook for production is going to be, I think it'll be, we'll have a clear picture of what some of the impacts will be for 2024.

Okay. Thank you. As a follow-up, just wanted to ask Jim about, the strategy on EV, this is a question that came up earlier, two-thirds of your last backlog update was EV. So presumably there is a fair amount of spend that you have on these programs. And I recognize, you'll give us an update on where the backlog is, but, to what extent do you have the ability to moderate your spend on EV or is it that if you have programs that are in place, this is spend that's occurring regardless, even if there's risk that the programs may not materialize? So maybe you could give us a sense of, we're hearing from automakers that are pulling back on spend. How are you thinking about your spend in light of this pullback?

Yes, that's a really good question, but a very broad question. So I hope I can get to a good point here so it's clear. But, the first thing I'd start with, any supplier, we're the tail on the dog, but tail on the dog in a good way from the standpoint, if they push out their spend, that means they're pushing out their programs, it pushes out their timing, which pushes out our spend. So that's kind of the first kind of high level way I would think about it. The second thing I would tell you is just that, and it's hard to articulate and maybe even illustrate for you, but, when we think about the way we've set our company up, let's take motors or inverters, we set them up not to be a program specific product. They are very much so, and obviously they have some exclusivity and specific designs to them by the customer, but the core of our products, that actually goes for the mechanicals as well, is all of those are scalable up the curve. So if we implement or we install the capacity, human capacity, equipment capacity, it's essentially all flexible and modular, and we're able to kind of pull that in. So long story short, as volumes on programs are pulled in, let's say for the sake of discussion slower, we just have to spend a little bit lesser depending on the volume pull through so on and so forth, but we still will need the products. I mean, none of us on this call are at all in denial that electrification is still coming at a very fast rate. Whatever it was last year, 1% of the North American market, this year 7% of the North American market, etcetera, we all know the stats. So there is going to be plenty of pull through market, maybe not as fast in North America as Europe, or maybe not as fast as Europe as in China, but the markets are going to be there. Our products are global products. We'll be able to scale up as the customer pull throughs come through and as the end markets come through.

Great. Thank you.

The next question is from Joe Spack with UBS. Your line is open.

Thanks, everyone. Good morning. Maybe to sort of follow up on a couple of themes already here, and I guess Jim I'll just follow on with your most recent comments. So understand we'll have to wait to hear about the backlog, and that you can sort of push investment to better time what your customers are doing. You did note that in the quarter, you did some of that, and I think that sort of helped some of that EV profitability. So how should we think about this in relation to your existing target to hit a break even in 2025? Because if the volume's lower, but you're also sort of pulling back, does that still net out to be able to hit that target, or does that change the trajectory of it at all?

Hey, Joe, it's Tim. Yes, obviously, it's pretty dynamic. So we continue to, as Jim mentioned, a lot of the investment's fungible. So we're making it, and where we can push it around or defer it or become more efficient with it, we're doing so. In terms of 2025, I think based on where we're at today and the current run rate of programs, that's probably still where we see the EV business in 2025. Obviously, it is pretty dynamic. So we'll give an update on that in February as we continue to see the market develop and what new business is able to be secured between now and then.

Okay. And then just going back to the performance in the quarter and some of the early thinking for 2024, obviously, sort of you noted, there does appear to be good sort of underlying execution in this quarter. And I think that could, once we get past the strike issues, could give some confidence for people into next year. But candidly, the business is really hard to forecast. Even if we look at slide 14, the second box, if you look at segments like LVD and commercial vehicle, you see the flow through on traditional organics greater than the sales chain. So can you just give a little bit more texture as to sort of what's going on beneath the surface in those segments? Like maybe what are true volume incremental, decremental margins? And then what is the hard work that you've done that's been causing that conversion to be greater and what's sustainable into 2024?

Yes. Obviously, they're all pretty different. But if you look at Light Vehicle and you adjust for the strike in the quarter, the improvement is still pretty dramatic even still. That's really being driven by, first of all, 2022 was obviously a pretty difficult comparison. Even in the third quarter, we continue to see pretty volatile demand. That improvement is really allowing a lot of the important implements on the plant floor to be able to show through. That's going to continue. Obviously, as you get into 2024, the comparison to 2023 isn't the same. It isn't going to be as dramatic. Certainly, we'll continue to see those improvements. So I don't think you can assume that the improvement operationally is going to be sequentially greater or continue. But the fact is that when the customer starts to run better, all the things we've done across the business to really drive commoditization and efficiency and really a lot of the waste is really starting to show through. So do I think there's some more of that in 2024? Sure. I think we'll continue to be able to do that. I'm sure we'll meet a lot of other challenges in 2024 as well. So we'll have to see how it all nets out. But that's a big driver really across all the segments. If you think about commercial, I'll use that one. Sales are down, but that's a tale of sort of two markets. Brazil's down quite considerably. And what you're seeing is sort of the sales offset that you have in North America and a lot of really strong efforts from a commercial perspective to really improve margins in that business. So it's a mixed bag when you look at the different segments. And I agree, it's sometimes hard to sort of parse out. Each has its own story. And I think the teams are doing a great job to really drive the improvements that need to be, whether it's plant floor or commercial or managed spend in all of them.

Well, I appreciate that. Tim, maybe just to sort of like zero in on LVD then. Like if we, if a traditional organic was up 15 million sales, if we just, broad strokes assume a 20% incremental margin flow through on that, that would suggest what, some like almost 20 million plus, like not from volume. So how much of that is recoveries versus some of the work you've done on your own to sort of help get you there?

A big, the biggest single chunk of that is really operational, to be very honest, right? It is, right? I mean, the strike was the last two weeks in the quarter. So there's a lot of very strong operational improvements. And the customer, prior to the strike ran extremely well in some of our largest programs and we were able to see the flow through of all the work that's been done to get the plants to run where they need to run.

Okay. Thank you.

The next question is from James Picariello with BNP Paribas. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning everyone. Just on off-highway, the third quarter took a step down, but I think you could point to a handful of years and say that seasonally, that's what events consistent for the third quarter. Just curious what you're seeing there in terms of a --construction mining, and should we expect -- I mean, is there going to be a seasonal pickup in the fourth quarter? Just kind of an overview on the key puts and takes on off-highway. Thanks.

Yes. So I don't think you can -- we're not seeing a real uptick from a fourth quarter perspective in there, right? We've been -- we've done a really nice job. We did a really nice job of going and getting a lot of recoveries from the customers. And we've done a really nice job of trying to keep as much of that margin as we can. We know that we're going to have to give some of this back. We started to see a little bit of that in the third quarter. That probably continues a bit more into the fourth. I mean the end markets all remain good and strong, and we'll continue to deliver in them. But I think some of that's being -- some of the pricing we had gotten and now that we don't -- we're seeing some of the pullback in inflation, we're going to have to give a little bit of that back, and that's going to pressure both the top line and a bit of the margin as we run into the fourth quarter.

Got it. And then just on the commodity front, as we think about next year, looking at current spot pricing, what would be kind of the set up the positioning on commodities? Would that be an additional or could that be an additional tailwind for you into next year?

Yes. I mean, I'm not going to comment on next year. We're obviously working through that now, and we'll have to make -- we'll make some decisions about where we think commodities will be and how that will flow through. I don't expect it to be material one way or the other, but I don't think we're ready to give an indication of what we think the commodity impact is going to be yet for next year.

Okay, thanks guys.

The last question is from Winnie Dong with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.

Hi, thank you so much. The EV topic has been touched upon several times already, but I was just wondering how much of the EV backlog is actually for light vehicles? And are you hearing any of your customers talking about a slowdown potentially because we're being hearing that from sort of like the broader market? And then can you also maybe dimension for us what you're seeing in terms of other markets given the diversification factor?

Good morning. Just an overview, I'd say -- and maybe, Tim, you have a few words to add as well to you. I would just say this, the overall slowdown in the programs in terms of the timing, volumes and so on and so forth. Largely speaking, they're where we thought they would be at this point, maybe a little bit of pullback on pushout, nothing too dramatic. You got to remember, again, it's -- we're not a Light Vehicle company. And I know you know that alone. We're in a bus market. Obviously, there's a lot of large pull for zero admissions and school bus markets and much more there. So not a big pullback. And as it relates to the other markets, if it's going to be slower and let's now use Light Vehicle as an example, and call it, the truck business. If they're not manufacturing electric trucks. They're going to be manufacturing internal combustion engine trucks, and that's good for our business as well. So we just -- we're very -- I said it from the very beginning, when we talked about our enterprise strategy in 2016 and then in 2018 as well. We set up the company to be energy-source agnostic. We're ready, but no matter what it is, and we just were able to flex on the fly to whichever that maybe. Tim, I don't know if you have anything to add.

Yes, just on your specific question on LV in the backlog, it's pretty minor in terms of what's actually in the backlog for the Light Vehicle EV. Mostly because our EV, as we've mentioned, is really the last of our segments, our major segments to electrify Commercial vehicle was the first. So -- the programs we have run, they tend to have a longer run rate in development, and so they tend to fall outside of the current LV backlog or the current 3-year backlog.

Okay. That's really helpful. And then maybe asked another way, just because what we're thinking about sort of like 2024, from a modeling standpoint, do you think like Q3 or like yearly Q3 is a better way to sort of as a good base to start thinking about 2024, If there's any sort of seasonality factors we need to consider? Thanks.

Yes. I mean is obviously seasonality. We talked a little bit about how fourth quarter tends to be a little lower. So our second and third quarters tend to be our best quarters historically. I think that continues -- but as I mentioned earlier, we'll give an update on 2024 in February, and we can have a discussion about them, but I don't have anything specific on modeling for 2024 at this point.

Okay, thank you so much.

Okay. With that, this is Jim. Just a quick couple of closing comments as I always do, thank you very much for your time and attention. We appreciate it very, very much. Second, the tale of the tape is, from my view, anyway, is steady sequential financial progress really across all of our business units. There's a little bit of seasonality as it relates to off-highway more European-based, and Q3 can be can be a little bit slower and some things can happen there in Q3. But again, great numbers and great progress across all the business units for sure, rolling up to where we're at today. Outstanding once performance, it could be easily underestimated because there's not everybody is in the day-to-day business like maybe how others are -- what does it take to launch 120 programs across 1 company. When it go from -- you got to win the program, you got to finance the program, you've got to launch the program, you got to ensure great quality. That's remarkable, and there's no impact. You can see it. The scoreboard doesn't lie. No splash in the financials of any massive premium freight, massive labor, massive this, mass of that instead, nothing but improvement there. So I really want to thank the entire Dana team as well as our customers. As we work through these challenges together, major launches, yes, -- but think about the UAW impact us, it's like COVID all over again, and it's sort of seamless. I mean obviously, it's going to have some impact on everyone's financials as it relates to Q4 numbers but as it relates to running the business and ensuring that the end consumer gets great products, we're in great shape together. So thank you very much again for your time and attention. We look forward to talking to you next year.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.