Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Curtiss-Wright Second Quarter 2013 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call may be recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Martin Benante, Executive Chairman. Please go ahead.

Well, thank you, Danielle, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Curtiss-Wright second quarter 2013 earnings conference call. Joining me today, and back by popular demand, is Dave Adams, our newly elected President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board; and Glenn Tynan, our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Early this morning, we have actuated the company's leadership transition and management reorganization plan, which was at least 5 years in the making. Starting with Dave Adams being appointed COO, and aggressing through a rigorous succession and evaluation timeframe. The board and I have reached the conclusion that Dave should be the future leader of Curtiss-Wright. Throughout this leadership transition, I am turning out the CEO reins to Dave who has been a strong leader within the organization for more than a decade, while I will be transitioning from the CEO to the role of Executive Chairman effective immediately. As a career employee of Curtiss-Wright, the timing of this announcement and my retirement in 2015 are aligned with my intentions to leave the company at age 62. It has been an absolute pleasure to work with such a great corporation as Curtiss-Wright for the past 35 years, the last 13 being the CEO, and to lead our acquisition and diversification strategies as we grew from less than $300 million in sales when I first became CEO to $2.5 billion and surprise today. During the timeframe, we have greatly broadened our exposure to new end markets and geographies to truly become a global and diversified business. One final comment before we move on. Dave's leadership and operational experience, which has included the integration of 17 acquisitions have provided a solid foundation that will serve him well into the future. I have the utmost confidence that Dave will succeed as the new CEO of Curtiss-Wright. And I'd like to be the first to publicly congratulate him on his new role. Congratulations, Dave.

Thanks, Marty. I'm pleased to have been selected by the Board of Directors as the company's new Chief Executive Officer. I look forward to working closely with Marty and the rest of the board and the management team, to lead Curtiss-Wright through the next phase of its evolution. Looking ahead, I remain confident in the company's ability to deliver strong growth in revenue and operational expansion based on solid growth enhanced by strategic acquisitions. We're dedicated to increasing long-term shareholder value. We will continue to integrate our recent acquisitions and expand our margins to deliver solid growth for the bottom line. Our management team has also focused on improving our cash flow generation to support the business and to fuel our acquisition strategy. Now on to the second quarter results. Overall, sales and operating income results were solid with organic operating income growing 30% on essentially flat organic sales, producing 260 basis points in margin improvement year-over-year. These results reflect the benefits from our previously implemented restructuring and operational improvement initiatives. We generated $0.70 in diluted earnings per share, which included a penny of contribution from our recent acquisitions. This concluded a solid first half of 2013, which would have been even stronger without the impact of purchase accounting from the recent acquisitions. This performance, along with our continued focus on improved operation efficiency, should put us on track for strong, double-digit increases for the top and bottom line in 2013, and gives us confidence in raising our guidance. We expect the combination of these factors to provide momentum for further improvement heading into 2014. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Glenn for a review of our financial performance.

Thank you, Dave. Our call today is being webcast. And the press release as well as a copy of today's financial presentation are available for download through the Investor Relations section of our company website at www.curtisswright.com. A replay of this call also can be found on the website. Please note today's discussion will include certain projections and statements that are forward-looking as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management's current expectations, and are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements always involve risks and uncertainties. And we detailed those risks and uncertainties in our public filings with the SEC. In addition, certain non-GAAP financial measures will be discussed on the call today. A reconciliation is available in the earnings release, and at the end of this presentation, and will be available on the company's website. For our agenda today, I will provide you with an overview of Curtiss-Wright's second quarter 2013 performance and financial outlook, followed by Dave who will provide an update on our recent acquisitions before turning it back to Marty to wrap up, and then open the call for questions. We produced a solid second quarter that was led by our 7 most recent acquisitions and the benefit of prior restructuring and operational improvement initiatives. While the acquisitions added slightly more than $100 million in sales and $5 million in operating income in the quarter, they also created 90 basis points in operating margin dilution. However, the second quarter impacts of the acquisition margin dilution, most of which was related to purchase accounting, was less than the first quarter. And this trend will continue as we progress through the remainder of the year. Excluding the recent acquisitions from our second quarter results, total organic operating margin rose…

Thanks, Glenn. I wanted to take a few minutes to provide you with an update on our integration status for each acquisition. I'll begin with Williams Controls. Thus far, we have integrated the industrial sales and marketing teams including the employment of new leadership, and consolidated our existing aerospace sensors business in China into Williams' state-of-the-art manufacturing facility. As for next steps, we're focused on the integration of Williams' joystick and sensors product lines with their existing offering, as well as leveraging Curtiss-Wright's supply chain management to further improve Williams' cost structure. Also, as previously noted, we intend to expand our industrial presence in India, using Williams' facility as a base to further increase the worldwide penetration of both our sensors and electronic throttle controls. In addition, we remain focused on growing Williams sales to the industrial off-highway vehicle market by driving synergies that include cross-selling and marketing new business through existing Curtiss-Wright relationships. Thus far, Williams is tracking in line with plan financially and ahead of plan in terms of integration. Next, the PG Drives where we've made solid progress year-to-date. This includes the integration of industrial sales and marketing teams, and the consolidation of U.S. and China sales offices. Elsewhere, despite ongoing industry issues that are impacting the U.S. medical mobility market, PG Drives has experienced solid growth in 2013 due to solid power chair system sale. This includes growth in BRIC economies, particularly in Russia and Brazil. PG Drives also experienced growth in industrial market sales for new forklift, truck motor controllers as we continue to win share from competitors. Next, I wanted to highlight a recent positive development that exemplifies the benefits of our business strategy and our ability to leverage the combination of our sensor businesses. PG Drives recently executed a favorable global supply agreement…

Well, thank you, Dave. We are pleased with the solid first half performance, and remain confident in our outlook for strong, double-digit growth in sales, operating income, earnings per share. As Dave highlighted, the integration of our most recent acquisitions is going very well. The continued dedication and focus of our management teams to generate margin expansion and improve cash flow reflects our ongoing operational excellence and lean initiatives, and positions Curtiss-Wright very well for the future. I'd like now to highlight some key factors affecting some of our end markets. Starting in defense, following the implementation of sequestration in March, we have seen modest reductions where you expect them to be, such as troop-carrying vehicles and related platforms tied to reduction in oversee forces. While there hasn't been any specific platforms that have been cut as a result of sequestration, we are seeing a widespread and direct impact through revolver incoming order rates, particularly in the aerospace and ground defense markets. However, based on our previous actions that began in 2012 and was implemented well in advance of anticipated decline in sales, we have actually expanded our operating margins in these defense markets in 2013, and expect to continue this trend in the future. As Glenn noted earlier, our outlook in the aerospace and ground defense market remains -- really reflects our expectation for continued lower order rates in 2013. And our sales guidance remains unchanged. Regarding the fiscal 2014 budget request, the navy defense outlook appears to be positive, while the picture in the aerospace and ground defense remain cloudy. Shipbuilding remains at the top of the DOD's priority, and will likely suffer fewer cuts than any other program areas. The DOD's changed and strategic focus to the specific end Asia places key emphasis on the U.S. Navy…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Steve Levenson from Stifel. Stephen E. Levenson - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Congratulations, Marty, on [indiscernible] decision. And congratulations, Dave, and good luck going forward. Just repeat, congratulations then on being able to get to the point of making your decisions, and to Dave on his promotion and to the future.

Thank you.

Thank you. Stephen E. Levenson - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: And in relation to margin improvement, is that pretty much all from integration? Or are you seeing share gains from things like the PG Drives supply agreement you mentioned earlier?

Well, when you take a look at our margin expansion, a lot of it comes from investments that we've made where we've expanded into Mexico, both in our aerospace and sensor. We're seeing some very good pickups. And in fact, we expect more than $10 million of additional profitability this year on cost reductions alone. And we also are trying to -- investments are paying off. So you're starting to see some of the investments that we've made. It takes a while to transfer all of the product that we have into Mexico. We're still not at peak performance yet. Colatro, we just started this year. We're seeing some good returns from it, but realistically have not yet seen the best production and utilization out of those plants yet, as well as China. So you're starting to see a combination of a couple of things taking place. Stephen E. Levenson - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Okay. A question on order rates on defense. Even though you don't see an immediate impact from sequestration, do you think this is in part due to furloughs of contracting personnel that seems to slow down workflow in the government? Or do you think this is more of a trend?

I think it's kind of more of a trend. I think that realistically, we haven't had any organic growth this year. And a lot of it is that even though we've made good gains on the commercial side, the military side has been reduced. Even though that it's not sequestration, we're seeing a direct -- indirect impact of sequestration, but in the areas that we expect it. And realistically, even in the aerospace defense, you may be cutting down on military aircraft. But we make commercial aircraft in the same plant. So we're really not seeing that much of an effect from a utilization standpoint. The other thing on your first question, Steve, I might have missed that. Realistically, a lot of the inventory writeoffs where our acquisitions are over with. From the third quarter on, we're actually going to see another $11 million pickup in profitability off the acquisitions. So I think I missed that aspect of your question. Stephen E. Levenson - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Last one, in the M&A pipeline, I know it's been a bit slower. We launch -- should -- part of that is you referenced to integrate. But are you seeing things that are still well-priced or are multiples beginning to get a little expensive?

I'll talk to that, Marty. We have a pipeline that's fairly filled with opportunity. And it always sees -- we see it across-the-board there. Some are pricier than we might have expected. But overall, I don't think that we're seeing much of a delta between the last several years expectation-wise and what we expect to pay. So what we saw last year was with all things loosened up towards the second half. And we are very helpful that some things will happen this year. We're positive that some of these will be carried forward. So we have not seen a lot of change in that.

And our next question comes from Myles Walton from Deutsche Bank.

Marty, congratulations. Dave, good luck.

Thanks, Myles.

Congratulations, too, but good luck. So can you start with the acquisitions first? I think previously, the 2013 accretion was going to be $0.12. I think it was $0.06 diluted in the first quarter a penny, I guess, accretive here in the second quarter. Is the $0.12 for the full year still the right number going or has that actually moved higher?

No, it's still the same.

Okay. And then you -- another clarification. Glenn, you mentioned the $0.03 hit in the quarter or $3 million hit in the quarter from the charge on a curtailment, but the corporate expense actually went down. Is that where the curtailment was?

The curtailment would be in the corporate expense, yes.

And then for the full year, corporate expense went down, though?

By a $1 billion. The corporate expense is up in the second quarter.

Sorry, I meant in the guidance for the full year?

Oh, yes, yes, yes. Well, because the pension -- just to explain what happened. The board approved an amendment to the Curtiss-Wright plan, which resulted in the curtailment charge in the second quarter. But as a result of the curtailment, we were also able to perform a remeasurement of the plans, assets and liabilities. If you look at the balance sheet, you probably would have seen quite large, like $45 million reduction in our pension liability. But also, we were able to adjust the discount rate up. So you will see favorable pension, lower pension in the second half of the year of about $2 million as an offset. So for the year, we're kind of -- it's almost awash.

Okay. So then looking into next year, given the remeasurement, can I now think about pension being, or given where discount rates, do you have any feel for, given the adjustments plus the discount rate, where you're thinking in terms of...

Again, we're going to go through this again in the fall. And I -- we think as they're going out, it would look we might have an opportunity to increase the discount rate again if things continue this way. And it's -- I think the sensitivity is about $2 million in expense for every quarter point.

Okay, great. And then, Dave, on the business, can you talk about orders at a high level in general? And you've been at a pretty steady backlog here for a number of years in a couple of dynamics going on between the AP1000 and defense as an end market in general. But you've been at this $1.6 billion, $1.7 billion backlog for, I guess, 5 years now. Is there a big shift coming? Have we anniversaried a lot of the burn-off of the Chinese orders? Can you just talk about that in general over the next 6 to 12 months?

Yes. I don't see a big change there. We've been talking about receiving a big order toward the second -- other than the second half of this year from China. We still anticipate that. So, yes, we're very optimistic about that. So -- and I really don't see much of a delta from what we've seen over the last couple of years.

If anything, there should be a...

There should be a bump, yes.

And our next question comes from Elizabeth Grenfell from Bank of America.

I just had a couple of questions. The first one, on the Surface Technologies margins for the rest of the year, what is baked in that's going to make them lower than the second quarter's 18.5%?

Yes. It's really a couple of things. For one, the second quarter, just to comment on the first half in the second quarter in particular was, has been a record production at our facility that services Airbus, which is it's like the high-margin facility and a fusion [ph] facility. So part of it's timing. It should because that's going to be lower in the second half. So kind of the way that fell throughout the year.

What happened is in the summertime, there is some shutdowns in the aerospace industry, of which Surface Technology has over 50% of their volume is in aerospace, commercial aerospace. So that's why the reason why you see a little bit of a dip in the second half as our third quarter normally goes down historically.

And also, there are some new greenfields. So it's a couple of -- with some startups in the second half that are not in the first half. So we're not ready for -- I mean, we're at 17.1% year-to-date. And our guidance is just below that. So it's not down tremendously, but it'll be a bit lower than the first half.

Yes. Well, sequentially, it will be down about 200 basis points or so?

Yes. It's probably in that area.

Okay. Is there any word on the AP1000 order from the Chinese? Any update?

Well, the only update is that we are in negotiation, which still goes back and forth between the quantity and the participation. But we do expect they'd be resolved within the third or fourth quarter. So -- and that fits in our the timing of what we'd like to get a new order to come in to order, to have contiguous production.

Sure. And then just one last question. Eagle had a statement out yesterday on the strategic choices in management or view sort of outlying a couple of options for the future, the DOD. And I was just curious what steps Curtiss-Wright is taking given that the carrier groups could shrink from 11 to 8 or 9. They could take a modernization holiday. Well, how are you thinking about it strategically from your point of view?

From our point of view, right now, there is a lot of strong support for keeping the carrier task force the way it is. As I said during my presentation that the strategic focus is they shifted to Asia Pacific. And realistically, the first response you have are aircraft carriers. So we really don't see us or in the United States going through that type of change, which is quite a bit.

And our next question comes from Michael Ciarmoli from KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Great job, and congratulations as you retire here and leave the business in good hands with Dave. Congrats. Can you just -- the organic growth in the quarter, no surprise. But can you give us an update, I mean organic growth expectations for the full year? And maybe if you can help us -- I'm assuming defense organically will be down. Can you give us a sense of maybe where both sides of the business will be from a revenue growth standpoint on an organic basis?

I think the second half there, we haven't really changed our expectation for -- to be basically flat organically for the year. So we will have some organic growth that we're expecting in the second half of the year, Mike.

Okay. And assuming that there will be more of that organic growth to be skewed on the commercial side?

That is correct.

That is correct.

And what about -- just on the margins here, I think you mentioned 10.3% kind of excluding some of the acquisition headwinds. What are you guys -- what should we be thinking about future margin expansion? You just mentioned some greenfield facilities in Surface. I would imagine as utilization improves, that will help. It sounds like you've got a lot of synergies left. It sounds like you're going to get some pension tailwinds next year. How should we be thinking about these margins continuing to build over the next 6, 12 months and beyond?

Well, I think, Mike, if you take a look at -- first of all, our acquisitions are going to be more profitable next year. We also, when we talked about the gas and oil where we are adding, taking systems from Simran and making them [indiscernible] Houston. That should give us a very, very good pump. We will not have crossed over from until the very end of this year, where we'll actually be hit our cost requirement about the 20% improvement, at least that Dave was talking about, will take place throughout '14. So you're going to see a nice bump in '14 and then also another nice bump in '15. And as I talked about the plants that we've put into Mexico and -- or 2 plants that we've put in Mexico, we already received a $4 million improvement to-date on just one of them. When I say to-date, I mean within this year. And that's going to continue on. Both plants will actually be more efficient next year, and also our plant in China. So over the next 6 months to the next year or the 2-year, we expect our margins to grow quite a bit.

And our next question comes from Jim Foung from Gabelli. James Foung - Gabelli & Company, Inc.: Congratulations to both Marty and David. Marty, great job and then, Dave, welcome, and good luck in your -- in the future.

Thank you.

Thanks. James Foung - Gabelli & Company, Inc.: I guess -- and the first question is on your acquisitions. You -- was good enough to break out the acquisition contribution. And the margins you say in the second quarter was about 5%. Could you just talk about the margin progression over the next 12 to 24 months, how you see that growing? And when do you expect that to kind of get back -- to get to your corporate average?

Well, as we talked about forward, we're going to see a bump immediately in the second quarter, obviously, to get to from $0.05 to $0.12 for the year each within the second half. So we get a bump, and it's primarily due to the burn-off of the inventory step, which is pretty much done at the end of the second quarter. And then I think Marty has indicated going into 2014, we're going to see even better growth in that from the acquisitions as well, so... James Foung - Gabelli & Company, Inc.: But when do you think those margins can reach the corporate level rate?

We're going to keep stretching them as we keep raising the corporate rate. We have to -- we said that we -- it takes at least, we say 3 years has been an average of getting acquisitions up. It's not -- I'm not saying to exactly get to our level of margin, but pretty close to it. That's kind of...

2 to 3 years

2 to 3 years, yes. James Foung - Gabelli & Company, Inc.: 2 to 3 years? Okay, all right. So no change there then. And then, Marty, you talked about, I guess, sequestration not being -- as a bigger impact issue anticipated this year. But then 2014 could be, I guess, harder. Could you just kind of expand on that in terms of do you see your overall defense sales to be down even more in 2014 than this year?

Well, the thing is that we actually could do a little bit better from the sales standpoint in 2014 based on some modernization programs of the Bradley and a lot of the ground vehicle. We should be getting above that of the Navy. But then again, sequestration could take away all those modernization programs away, which wouldn't even hurt us, but it just wouldn't help us. So 2014, it's hard to go through the pluses and minuses. It's just that we deliver the organization. We did it in anticipation of sequestration. Some of our businesses are not affected, because we're making commercial product there greater than what the military has gone down. So when we look at it, we're not really that -- it's not that bothersome for us. We have enough leverage in the commercial side, the pickup from the commercial side that we should do very well for ourselves in spite of what we could even anticipate going on in sequestration for 2014.

[Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from Tyler Hojo from Sidoti & Company. Tyler Hojo - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Let me also just add my congratulations to both Marty and Dave.

Well, thank you. Tyler Hojo - Sidoti & Company, LLC: You're welcome. So just kind of to continue along the margin dialogue. Certainly, it was nice to see the margins step in the Controls segment this quarter. I'm hoping that maybe you could talk a little bit about what your confidence level is in achieving the margin gains in the back half that are implied in the guidance? Also, if we look back to your 2012 guidance for that segment, it kind of implied that you'd be up towards, I think, like the 16% or 17% range in the fourth quarter of the year. Do you think you can get back to those levels?

Tyler, are you just talking about Controls? Tyler Hojo - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Yes, just Controls.

Oh, okay. Well, on the Controls side, one of the things is they probably got hit the most when it came to having less orders on the military side. So the reorganization that they did and the additional profitability they're getting out of their low-cost plants in China and Mexico has been able to actually improve their margins. And we see that going forward throughout the remainder of the year.

And Tyler, just to put in perspective. I mean the second half of the year, Controls has about $28 million in incremental sales, $21 million of it is organic. So we'll get approximately $8 million of additional OI in H2 just from the incremental organic, sales or the organic company sales. The acquisitions are going to be up about $7 million in sales in the second half, which is going to yield $7 million of OI. Part of that's margin, and part of it is the burn-off of the inventory step, as I talked about you'll see in the second half of the year. They have $7 million of cost reductions and operational excellence improvements. Marty referred to the low-cost economy gains that Controls will see in the second half of the year and some other minor onetime things that hit the first half that aren't going to cut $1 million or $2 million. And that will incur at the second half. So we have a pretty good roadmap of getting them to their full-year margins. And sequentially, they're probably going to improve sequentially just to give you an idea of how their year's going to lay out for the year, improvements. Tyler Hojo - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Okay, great. And also, do you happen to have the backlog by segment?

Yes. Flow Control's 1.1 and Controls is 0.6. Tyler Hojo - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Okay, perfect. And just in regards to the defective impeller supplier, could you just update us on how you've replaced that supplier? Is it single sourced at this point? Or do you have more than one supplier on that?

Right now, it's single sourced, but we are looking at developing. I think we may even have a second source, I'm not sure. Tyler Hojo - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Okay, great. And the last question for me, it is just on the nuclear aftermarket. Obviously, it's been a source of strength for you all last handful of quarters. I mean, how long is the tail that you see on that? I mean...

It's a long, long, long time. If you take a look at the fact that we're at our lowest outage, so just outages go up, the Fukushima Initiatives, the obsolescence that when we talk about obsolescence in the United States, remember the United States has the first nuclear build program from our nuclear technology. And then expand out to the rest of the world. So the same obsolescence that we'd seen in the United States is also going to take place throughout the world. And that we have coverage throughout the world. And most of the plants are kind of Westinghouse plants or familiar with them, Areva, which we have installed base, or Korea. So that's going to continue to grow. So we look at the aftermarket as continue to go on for a long, long period of time. Tyler Hojo - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Okay. Just one follow-on to that. I mean, you've been tracking around $117 million, $118 million in terms of nuclear -- in terms of your nuclear business. How much of that would you say is aftermarket relative to new build?

Aftermarket and power gen? Tyler Hojo - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Yes.

About 2/3.

Thank you. And I'm not showing any further questions. I would now like to turn the call back to Mr. Benante for any further remarks.

Well, thank you very much for joining us today. And we also look forward to speaking with you during our third quarter 2013 earnings call. And also, we'd love to see you at our Investor Day. Have a good one. Take care.

Bye bye.

Goodbye.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude today's program. You may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.