Good day and welcome to the Carvana Fourth Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Mike Levin, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Sean. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen and thank you for joining us on Carvana's fourth quarter and full year 2019 earnings conference call. Please note that this call will be simultaneously webcast on the Investor Relations section of the company's corporate website at investors.carvana.com. The fourth quarter shareholder letter is also posted on the IR website. Joining me on the call today are Ernie Garcia, Chief Executive Officer; and Mark Jenkins, Chief Financial Officer. But before we start, I would like to remind you that the following discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including, but not limited to, Carvana's market opportunities and future financial results that involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed here. Detailed discussion of the material factors that cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements can be found in the Risk Factors section of Carvana's most recent Form 10-K. The forward-looking statements and risks in this conference call are based on current expectations as of today and Carvana assumes no obligation to update or revise them, whether as a result of new developments or otherwise. Unless otherwise noted, on today's call, all comparisons are on a year-over-year basis. Our commentary today will include non-GAAP financial measures, including, but not limited to, ex-Gift measures that exclude the impact of the 100,000 milestone gift to our employees. Reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP metrics for our reported results can be found in our shareholder letter issued today, a copy of which can be found on our Investor Relations website. Please note that all gross profit, SG&A and EBITDA metrics mentioned by us on the call today are on an ex-Gift basis. And now with that said, I'd like to turn the call over to Ernie Garcia. Ernie?

Thanks Mike and thanks for that extremely lively reading of the risk factors. We appreciate it. Thanks everyone else for joining the call. 2019 was another incredible year for Carvana with broad-based gains in all key operational and financial metrics. In the shareholder letter, we once again published our key metrics and our updated cohort graphs. Please take a moment to look over these charts. The story they tell is compelling. It's a story of extreme growth consistently sustained over a long period of time. The magnitude and consistency of these results are only possible because we have built a better business model that delivers the best customer experience available when buying or selling a car. 2019 was our sixth straight year of a triple-digit revenue growth with over 177,000 cars delivered to our customer and just shy of $4 billion in revenue. During the year, we delivered more cars to our customers than we had in our entire prior history combined. But it isn't just the percentage growth that is noteworthy. At this scale, that growth rate means we sold an incremental 83,000 cars this year. That is the most organic growth of any automotive retailer ever in the U.S. This year we expect another year of market-leading growth. The powerful unit economics inherent in our model continue to show up consistently. In 2019, we increased GPU by $750. Even more remarkably, it was our sixth straight year of over $400 of improvement in that metric. This year, we expect to notch our seventh. We also saw another year of very strong leverage with EBITDA margin improving over 4%, lighting the way to achieving our long-term financial model. We achieved this while simultaneously managing the cost to support 89% unit growth in our retail business and 230% growth in…

Thanks Ernie and thank you all for joining us today. We're pleased to report another quarter of strong growth in both retail unit sales and revenue. Retail units sold totaled 50,370 in Q4, an increase of 82%. Total revenue was $1.1 billion in Q4, an increase of 89%. In 2019, we completed our sixth consecutive year of triple-digit revenue growth. Revenue totaled $3.94 billion, an increase of 101% and retail units sold totaled 177,549, an increase of 89%. Our exceptional growth in 2019 was driven by rapid growth in our market cohorts. Our existing cohorts grew by 84%. Our four oldest cohorts, each more than 3 years old, grew by 50%, and our oldest cohort of Atlanta grew by 18%. Our cohort growth was broad-based, with many markets crossing key milestones. As of Q4, 90% of our markets were ramping faster than Atlanta at the same age and 23, seven, and two markets surpassed 1%, 1.5%, and 2% market penetration, respectively. These trends are a powerful demonstration of the positive feedback in our model with inventory selection and expanded IRC footprint, national brand awareness, and great customer experiences driving gains nationwide. Total GPU increased by $750 in 2019 to $2,883. Our GPU gains were also broad based, reflecting increases of $325 in retail, $308 in finance, $81 in ancillary products and $37 in wholesale. EBITDA margin was negative 5.8% in 2019, an improvement of 4.1%, reflecting gains in both CPU and SG&A leverage. 2019 was an exceptional year for buying cars from customers. In 2019, we acquired 104,000 vehicles from customers, an increase of 231%. When combining total retail units sold with standalone vehicle purchases, we transacted with over 256,000 customers, an increase of 138%. The exponential growth we saw in buying cars from customers in 2019 brought many adjustments…

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from Zack Fadem with Wells Fargo.

Hey guys. Curious if you could walk us through some of the broader assumptions in the unit guide? And then maybe explain in a little bit more detail why you expect unit growth to outpace total sales growth in 2020? And what the implications are for wholesale and other growth?

Sure. So, I think we're obviously very pleased with the growth that we're seeing across the business today. We put out a cohort charts again this year, which we hold be helpful as you try to decompose where growth is coming from in growing markets and also growth coming from the themselves growing. So, I think that's what's driving our assumptions. We feel really, really good about those being well-founded assumptions that we feel very comfortable with. And then as it relates to the revenue moving a little bit relative to last year, I think -- we're trying to leave room in ASP as we buy more and more cars from customers who want to really understand exactly how that's going to migrate. We've definitely seen a significant increase in the diversity of cars that we're able to buy from customers. We grew that diversity by about 50% from Q2 to Q4. And generally speaking, that's kind of a widening of inventory. But as that continues to evolve, we want to leave a little bit of room there. And since the major driver of our economic model is units anyway and we're guiding for GPU, we thought that was a prudent way to guide.

Okay, got it. And on the shift to a two shelf securitization model from a one shelf. I believe you said in the shareholder letter, that this had an impact to Q4 units. Curious how -- if you could explain that in a little more detail? And then also whether there's going to be an impact to 2020 units in GPU as a result?

Sure. So, I would clarify one point there. It's -- revenue in GPU, we believe, was impacted in Q4 by holding these loans over -- as we transition toward our two self-securitization next year. And basically, where that impact comes from is, had we sold the loans, we believe we would have earned a premium would have impacted revenue at GPU. Instead, we will earn that premium in 2020. And so I think that's the primary impact on revenue and GPU from that transition that would not enact retail units sold.

Got it. Appreciate the time guys.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from Ron Josey with JMP Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi, this is Andrew Boone on for Ron. Thanks for taking our questions. You guys now have 35,000 cars in the site. And I think you highlighted 50% greater selection. Can you talk about the benefits of that as well as just the operational challenges of having more sites at the as well as DSO? And then secondarily, where is that coming from? Is there any change in the auction side? Or is that all just from trade in? Thank you so much.

Sure. So, we do have now 35,000 cars on our website. I think something that's pretty unique about our business model that's powered by our supply chain logistics network that connects all of our markets together is that all of those cars are available to customers everywhere. So, that's a major source of positive feedback in the model. As we continue to add markets and grow within markets, we can justify larger inventories and those larger inventories give customers in every market, more and more selection. When we talk about the diversity increase of 50% from Q2 to Q4, that's driven by both the size of the inventory, which has grown. But most importantly, it's also driven by buying many more cars from consumers. Those do come from trade-ins and then also buying cars out right, even the customer is not buying a car from us simultaneously. We think that's a tremendous development in the model. If you take a step back and just kind of say what is the entire market for consumers buying cars. It's all about consumers just trading cars with one another. And there's all these different companies and mechanisms that stand between two consumers that are trading cars, whether it's all the dealers or us playing this role, the finance companies, the transport companies, there's many, many companies that sit in between consumers that are trading cars. And the more that's in that we can collapse, the more we can cut cost out of the system, the more valuable our platform becomes, the better offering we can give to customers to a simplified, more transparent offering, the more value we can share with them. And so we think that, that's a huge, huge evolution of the business that we're extremely happy with.

All right. Thank you.

Our next question will come from Rajat Gupta with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Hey good evening. Thanks for taking my questions here. Just wanted to ask my first question on the SG&A leverage. The $60 million in spending that you talked about in the shareholder letter to support this increased retail sourcing, could you give us a sense if majority of that spend is now behind you? Or should we expect any more areas of incremental investments in 2020? And just relatedly, it looks like the other cost bucket within the SG&A line, it continues to grow -- again, a part of that is likely driven by this retail sourcing initiative, but how should we expect that to lever in 2020 and beyond? And that will be all. And I have a follow-up. Thanks.

Sure. So, let me start with the $60 million incremental SG&A investment in buying cars from customers in 2019. So, the majority of that was advertising. The remainder was invested in building our technology, adding to our people for building this business as well as expenses related to actually executing the transactions. That -- those expenses, obviously, we think yielded a very good return. The growth in this business has been substantial. We were very excited to hit the middle of our long-term range for customer source cars as a percent of total retail units in Q4. So, we believe those investments are paying off. As we look forward to next year, I think the way to think about it is that the expenses related to buying cars from customers are reflected in our guidance for 2020. We certainly plan to continue advertising the product, the buying cars from customers. We believe that, that's a really great thing for us in the long run. And then -- yes, we'll continue to invest in other areas, building technology, making sure that we're appropriately staffed and the other needs of that business. And so all that's incorporated in our guidance for 2020.

Yes. And then I'll jump in as well. I think it's also worth -- we call it the shareholder letter, other transitional costs. I think it's worth kind of outlining those for you as well because they played a role in the quarter and they likely play a role in 2020 as well. So Mark spoke to the direct cost of $60 million. But I do think any time you have a business that's changing this quickly, there's going to be other expenses that flow through in other ways as well. But just to quickly try to put a finer point on those. I think there's always opportunity costs, there's management bandwidth, there's prioritization of our tech teams, there's different pinch points that emerge this year, they crowded out sales because we're investing so much in this business of buying cars from customers. And then I think another area is just adjustments in learning throughout the supply chain. So, we've spoken about the diversity; increase our inventory, that definitely drives other expenses that show up indirectly. And you can't kind of point to a line item for exactly what they are. But it means we have to optimize the way that we're bidding on cars that we haven't seen before. It means that we have to run those cars through the inspection center. Maybe we don't have as much experience of sort of being those cars through the inspection center. It means we need to price as we sell those cars to customers. And then there also is a little bit of a marketing mix rebalancing. So, I do think all of that is showed up in Q4 and in Q3, it will roll into 2020, it's in our guidance. And then I think -- to me, something that I think we're pretty proud of, and I want to make sure we point out here is we also did show reasonable SG&A leverage this year, despite absorbing all of those costs associated with building this business, largely from scratch. We bought 100,000 cars from customers this year. That's a lot of incremental transactions that we added. Those transactions don't show up very much, they don't contribute much to revenue. So, through kind of traditional leverage metrics of either dividing by retail units or dividing by revenue, those kinds of investments can largely be hidden a little bit. And so I think the progress we made this year is something we're extremely pleased with, and we think it's even better than it looks like at first glance.

And then I'll question on other SG&A. So, other SG&A went up by about $166 from Q3 to Q4. Roughly half of that is just seasonal investment. We saw about an $80 increase sequentially going from Q3 to Q4 last year. The rest of that increase, we largely attribute to this rapid transaction growth that we're seeing, driven by buying more cars from customers. I think there's three components of that other SG&A bucket, there's technology, there's corporate overhead expenses, including corporate occupancy and then there's transaction expenses. Buying cars from customers impacts all of those for reasons that we've discussed. We're investing in technology in buying cars from customers. We're expanding our headcount to support that business. And then we're also -- there's some additional transaction expenses that go along with supporting that business as well. I think when you look at those -- our total expenses on a per retail unit basis as Ernie was laying out, in this space where we're really building this business up for the first time, that's going to have an impact on per retail unit numbers that we expect to lever over time. And obviously, we're very excited about all the progress in that offering and expected to deliver significant benefits to the business in the long run.

Understood. Just a follow-up on the GPU guidance, the 3,200 to 3,400 and pretty substantial 300 to 500 increase year-over-year. Is it possible to parse out, like how much of that could come from retail GPU versus finance? Any sense on that? That will be all. Thanks.

Sure. So, similar to past years, we expect gains to come across all parts of the transaction. I think that's been a pattern in our March from 1,023 GPU in 2016 the year before we went public, up to 2,883 today, is that we've been making progress across all parts of the transaction, retail, wholesale, finance, ancillary products. We would expect that to be the case again in 2020.

Got it, great. Thanks for taking my questions and good luck.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from Seth Basham with Wedbush. Please go ahead.

Thanks a lot and good afternoon. I just want to follow-up on the points around buying cars from customers. You guys invest an incremental $60 million in SG&A this year. You bought 104,000 cars versus buying and selling a wholesale 15,000 cars in the prior year. So, an incremental 89,000 cars that were either bought from customers. What is the incremental profit you're earning on those cars? If it's less than probably about $700, then I don't see how you can make any ROI on it?

Sure. Well, I think a good place to start; just a very high level is using the numbers that Mark outlined. And so you said we spent about $60 million in hard costs. I do think, as part of building this this business, there's definitely indirect costs as well. But I think if we're trying to think about how the business rolls forward, probably looking at the hard costs is the smarter cost as. If you take that and divide by roughly 100,000 cars that we bought, that implies around $600 of expense per car. So, I think you can kind of think about it like that. If you look at the full year, our average contribution on a wholesale unit that we bought from a customer and sold at auction, we made around $400, give or take. And so I think at a high level, you can kind of do all the math there, you can see where it is right now. And then the question is, where does that go over time? And I think we expect a lot of things move positively there. One, we expect the kind of variable expenses per unit to drop pretty quickly. The largest sum of those hard costs were basically all the investments we made in marketing. This offering to consumers, we've seen those expenses lever very, very quickly in the past on the retail side, and we would expect them to lever very well as well in the future. The remainder of the costs really are pretty small, but there's definitely room for those to lever as well. On the margin side, if you kind of zoom out and look at the progress we've made on our wholesale units over a multiyear period, you'll see a steady march of progress there. I think that we expect to continue to march that up steadily. Some of the best-in-class operators have that number around about $1,000 as a frame of reference. And then we obviously expect significant gains in units as well. So, I think across the board, we view there's being a lot of potential there. We think the potential -- or the results that we had this year are extremely exciting, and we're very, very proud of them. I think the expectation to build that business largely from scratch to grow it by 3x and to try to have it contribute positively in the very first year, I think, is a tough expectation, but we obviously expect it to contribute very positively over time. And we think it's an enormous fundamental benefit to the business. It gives us access to kind of the deepest, most scalable, most diverse source of inventory that exists, those cars that are in consumers' hands. And so we're really excited about that, and that's roughly how the math works out.

Ernie, do you expect to turn the corner so that your expenses are less than the incremental profit you're making from buying cars from customers?

I think our results for the sum of the business are taking into account in our guidance. And so I would point you there, and I realize that's a much more general frame than the question that you're asking. I think it's smart for us to stay at that level of specificity because this is a business that four quarters ago, we outlined our long-term goal of being 38% to 52%. And then in four quarters, we jumped up to 43%. That happened really, really fast. We gave you is other staff that we increase inventory diversity by 50% in the last two quarters. There's just a lot of change happening there. We're seeing cars offered up to us from consumers that we have not seen many copies of in the past, and we're learning how to bid those properly. If you don't bid those right, you lose cars, you should have won, you give up margin in certain places, you give up conversion and others. As they pull-through the system, you've got all these different places, expenses show up. So, we're learning kind of very rapidly, I would say, and we expect to continue to make progress, but trying to give you the precise timing of when we're going to see leverage in marketing, that's tough. I think we feel really good about the offering. The results we've seen so far are very strong. We've got a lot of momentum. We feel like we've got a very clear path to our long-term model. And so I think we're going to point to that. And then as it relates to the business results, we'll just point to the guidance for the entirety of the bids.

Fair enough. Very dynamic and exciting. Thank you.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from Chris Bottiglieri with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead.

Hey guys. Thanks for taking the question. First one is on the -- you said pretty prolific road to the trade in ratio. When you look at your retail gross profit per unit in Q4, whether you frame that versus Q3 or Q4 2018, do you think the increased trading ratio have the commensurate impact on the retail GPU that you would have expected based on lower acquisition costs? Or similar to the wholesale GPU were there like some inefficiencies that maybe mitigate some of the near-term upside that you would have expected?

Right, I can hit that one. So, we certainly had a very strong quarter for buying cars from customers. I think we're at $1,349 for Q4 of 2019. It was up more than $400 year-over-year. A big driver of that strength and increase year-over-year was buying cars from customers. We had a nice incremental gross profit on cars bought from customers in Q4. And obviously, the ratio of cars back from customers to total sales has increased significantly, not only year-over-year, but also even quarter-over-quarter, just given the rapid growth in the business. And so that was certainly a key driver there's some other dynamics in the retail GPU strength in Q4. For example, Cyber Monday promotion units were a smaller fraction of total Q4 units this year than they were past -- in the past year or last year. And so that has a positive impact on retail GPU when comparing the two periods, other things being equal. So, definitely some strength in GPU in Q4 2019, and the biggest impact there was buying cars from customers.

Got you. That's helpful. And then some related. You've obviously done a good job of expanding the inventory selection or site by trade-ins. There's been, I guess, some -- it seems like you're testing partner trade-ins on your website and having those fulfilled from other dealers was willing to the extent you're willing to comment on that. High level, what are the puts and takes and the trade-offs from allowing dealers on your website? Like, how does it impact the consumer experience? And then like kind of what are the trade-offs in terms of unit economics that if you do decide to go forward with this? Thank you.

Sure. I'll try to answer that one. So, what I would say, at any point in time, we've probably got 3 to 5 pretty big projects that we're working on at Carvana; we've got different technology teams working on all kinds of different things. And we have many more than that, other products that we're testing at any point in time. So, I think, generally speaking, our policy to date has been that we're not going to dive into specific products that were working or that are going on in the background, unless we expect them to kind of impact our results in a material way going forward, unless they're a big contributor to the results that we've just reported. So I think there's always a lot of investment going on. Many of those things end up working out really well, like and like all the gains we've seen in finance, over the last year and a half years. And many of those things we roll out and we test and we realize that, they don't work great. And so I think as a general policy, I think we're going to stick to what we've stuck to in the past. And just know that we're always working really hard to try to make sure that we're coming up with the most innovative and best products we possibly can for our customers to constantly move the experience that they get forward in all the different ways that are important to them. And as we have specifics that we feel like warrants being addressed in a venue like this, we will certainly address them then.

Got you. That makes sense. Cool. Thank you.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from Rick Nelson with Stephens. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good evening. I'd like to dive into the days to sale. Where are you now? What are you targeting?

Sure. So in Q4, we were 62 average days of sale, that's actually the same as for the full year, where we were also 62 average days of sale. Q4 is up slightly year-over-year -- Q4 was up slightly year-over-year. The full year is down by two days year-over-year. I think our thought process on average days of sale right now is that we expect it to stay at a relatively stable and reasonable range. We're very comfortable with the level of inventory relative to sales that we have today. We think we're striking a nice balance between GPU, which is obviously stronger than it's ever been and making a great selection of cars available to customers on our site, which is really the key trade-off that we're balancing when we're thinking about inventory size. So, we're very comfortable in the range that we're operating in today. We do see a significant long-term opportunity to meaningfully bring down average days of sales from current levels. I think our model of having centralized inventory pools that we're able to make available to customers in many, many markets nationwide, gives us an opportunity to have very attractive average days of sales the fullness of time.

Hope so I'm seeing more older higher cars on your website, cars 10 years old, 100,000 miles. I'm curious if your return rates on those cars are different? I assume that's coming from your sourcing initiatives?

Let me hit the second part of that first. I do think, as we said before, we've definitely seen more diverse access to inventory by buying cars from customers, and that is driving a more diverse inventory for our customers to choose from on our website. And I think that, generally speaking, is widening. We're seeing more expensive cars. We're also seeing older higher mileage cars as you brought up. And I think overall, year-over-year, that, I believe, our ASP was very similar. But that is definitely dynamic as we continue to buy all these cars from customers. And so we want to keep an open mind where exactly how that's going to play out. As it relates to return rates and reviews, we've seen very, very consistent reviews and return rates across times -- across cars. I think early on, four or five years ago, a hypothesis would have been that we were going to be selling mostly one and two-year-old cars because those were the easiest cars for consumers to buy side on seeing and have delivered to their door. And I think that's been a pleasant surprise were time as we found that, one, there are consumers that are definitely willing to buy older higher mileage cars online. And that's as fast a growing part of our businesses anywhere, maybe a little bit faster even. And then two, the transaction -- technology that we've built, the processes that we built, the supply chain that we've built work very well for those customers, where we're seeing very high-quality reviews from them as well and return rates are in line with the rest of our population. So I think, overall, we view that as exciting. We've always thought that our TAM was very, very wide with respect to different types of cars, because our offering really is -- it's independent of car. We're trying to give customers a broad selection and great price increase experience. And that really has nothing to do with the specifics of any given car. So, we always kind of hope that would be the case, but I think we're continuing to see more and more evidence that points in that direction.

Our next question will come from Michael Montani with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks. I have one question, then one follow-up. The first question was about retention of customers. So, now that you look at a market like Atlanta, you're getting kind of five, six, seven years in operation there. Just curious if you could share any percentage of those customers that are actually being retained and returning to buy with you again? And then just had a follow-up.

Sure. So I think we definitely are seeing nice positive signals from our older markets. That said, if you go back to Atlanta five or six years ago, we had very small accounts of sales. And so I think when we look at repeat sales, the data is still thin enough to where I don't think we want to be giving out numerical guidepost just yet. But what we're seeing, we really like, we also see a lot of kind of cross family purchases where one member of the family will buy a car and then other members of the family buy cars, we see a lot of referrals. So, I think the early evidence for our experience resonating and consumers voting with their feet by coming back again is strong, but I don't know that it's numerically robust enough for us to want to quantify in a way that we feel confident will be consistent across time, given that it's still early in the company's history and we are only a seven-year old company.

Okay. Makes sense. And then if I could just follow-up on the retail GPU. So, the increase there was a little bit more than we thought just based on mix alone. So, I was going to ask, was there any change to kind of the shipping fees or depreciation rates or even like reconditioning that would have incrementally supported that, that we should know? And then just on a related note, obviously, you mentioned some competitors that have 1,000-plus GPU on the wholesale front, but they tend to have their own auctions as well. So, I'm just wondering if you see potential to get to that level or if you would actually need to open your own actions to do that?

Sure. So, let's take this one time. I think Mark kind of walked through some of the contributors to the strong fourth quarter retail GPU. One of the things that I think I would point to that is useful, especially on a year-over-year basis is this year, our sideline approach on actually went very well from an operational perspective. We are very prepared going in. I think the team did a great job handling all that extra volume. We were just coming off of kind of some constraints that we had seen in the third quarter, and we knew that we're going to be coming into another year of big growth in 2020. And so we didn't lean in as much with marketing dollars as we had in the past. We chose to take a little more careful approach there just to make sure that we were really positioning ourselves well heading into 2020. And so as a result, we saw a smaller percentage of our sales in the fourth quarter that got the Cyber Monday promotion discount. And so I think that was probably also something of a contributor that's worth noting. The other line items that you pointed to, I sure moving around a little bit, but I don't think they were -- I think the two big contributors were mixed effects and then the smaller contributor from Cyber Monday. And then as it relates to auctions, what I would say is, we've got a number of great partners we work with today to take our wholesale cars and go sell them and also to buy. Many of our retail cars, we're not buying from consumers. Our instinct will always be to find solutions that work great for us and our partners before going out and tackling another problem and trying to build something from scratch. But I think the point is well taken that the best-in-class operators that have $1,000 margin generally are also monetizing that portion of the transaction, and that's something which we're well aware.

Our next question will come from Nick Jones with Citi. Please go ahead.

I guess first, how much higher do you think the percentage of car sourced can go if you want to revisit that target? I mean do you have a different view after you've seen kind of the demand for the offering? And then I guess on top of that, when you do source a car from a customer, could you remind us how -- what process do those cars go through? Are you running it through the Carvana checklist? Is there an opportunity to maybe not have to do that quicker? Or if you are running through that, it seems like -- I guess piggybacking off the last question about auctions, that if you're kind of already indexing the data that's maybe more valuable through the wholesale channel than some other cars that hit the network?

Sure. So, let me take the first one and then maybe Mark is going to jump in on the second one, that will be helpful. So how high can this go? I think we set our long-term target, I guess, now four and a half quarters ago, give or take, at 38% to 52%. And that was a thoughtfully arrived at target by looking at what best-in-class operators had accomplished. I think the fact that we got to 43% this quickly is something that we are extremely happy about. And I think, as I said in my prepared remarks, we felt really good about that target early on because we felt like we've built the supply chain that enables a customer experience that we think, at least, is exactly what customers want. You can go on to our website, we can use all of our different data sources and value that car intelligently. We can give you a bid, and then we can go to your house and we can pick it up and you've got your money, and the whole transaction's over. And that was something that we were very confident would resonate well. And I think that the proof is in the pudding there, it clearly is resonating well. So we're very, very pleased there. That said, we still definitely have a lot of wood to chop. In an earlier question from Seth, we talked about the expense that we have per unit. That's something that we'll be attacking and addressing over time. We clearly have room in margin as well, getting smarter there and being smart about bidding those cars and pricing those cars and figuring out exactly which ones we want to buy. There's lots of room for us to grow there. And then I think just at this pace, trying to predict the continued speed of progress we're going to make is just very, very hard. I think that we've definitely benefited to a degree from the brand that we built up over the last seven years of delivering great experiences to customers. And I think that that's probably helped this offering to accelerate so quickly. But it's hard to know exactly how quickly it will accelerate from here. So I think we're very, very optimistic about the offering. We're very excited about how fundamentally valuable it is to our entire platform. But I think it's how we really make progress very deep in our long-term ranges across the board. We're going to stick with those ranges. We still feel like we have work to do, but we're very, very excited, as I said.

Yes. And then on your question about process, so after we take a car in from a customer, if it's a wholesale car, we'll typically sell it through one of the major wholesale auctions. If it's a retail car, we'll take it into one of our inspection and reconditioning centers and put it through the normal process that we would use for any car. That includes putting it through 150-point inspection, making sure that the car is reconditioned to our quality standards. We photograph the car and post it up on the site just like a car that we bought through another wholesale channel.

Great. Thank you for taking the questions.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from Brian Nagel with Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Hi, good evening. Thanks for taking my questions. So the first question I wanted to ask, I guess, bigger picture, but you talked in your letter about the continued rollout of your IRCs, and I think we're working on eight now. So as we're looking at your financials, so the continued development of financials against the backdrop and substantial growth, how should we think about the -- or factoring just the benefits, so to say, of this IRC rollout? Where does that sort of, say, showing up?

So, I think the number one place that it shows up is in volume. I think as we're marching toward 2 million units, one of the most important and, frankly, most challenging things that we have to do is scale production capacity. And so our IRC ramp is focused first and foremost on giving us the capacity to scale our volume on this path for 2 million units. I think there's potentially some other impacts that you may be driving at. So when we launch an IRC initially, it tends to take a little bit of time to get fully staffed up, get up to capacity as well as there's some learning at the individual site level as people are sort of learning by doing and getting better and more efficient over time. And so when we're adding these IRCs, there can be some short-term transitory impact to the reconditioning side of retail GPU. But those impacts have historically been somewhat small and, as I mentioned, transitory.

Okay, that's helpful. And the second question, just shorter term. Mark, we'd talked, in response to some of the questions, about the $60 million investment this year to help support the growth in the effort to buy cars from customers. That $60 million, how -- if we look at our models, what should we think that number is next year, in 2020?

Sure. So, we haven't given specific guidance on that. I think the -- it is incorporated into our guidance for the full year for the business as a whole. I think just to break down that $60 million, the majority of it was advertising. We certainly intend to continue advertising this offering of buying from customers. 2019 was basically year one of making customers aware of this product. We really started advertising in earnest in the first quarter of this year. And so building awareness of this offering is certainly going to be part of our plan in 2020. So, we'll continue to advertise. We'll continue to invest in some of those other areas as well, technology, continue to add people to support this business. And all of that's incorporated into our guidance. Having said all that, we also do, over time, expect us to -- these expenses to lever. We were in year one, grew incredibly quickly this year and are very happy with the progress on the cost side, certainly have expectations of levering over time.

Thank you very much.

Our next question will come from Armintas Sinkevicius with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you for taking the call. When I look at the cohort curves, Atlanta is tracking at 2.09 versus 1.94 a year ago, so 15 basis points growth here over the last 4 quarters. The other markets are growing some-30 basis points to almost double that rate. We've been tracking some of the Google search trends which would suggest Atlanta has been plateauing a bit. Maybe you could talk about that cohort, what have you seen there? Have you seen a competitive response after years of taking share? Or is it the dynamic around sourcing cars from customers? Anything else that we should be thinking of as we look at the rest of the cohorts and the dynamics there, and as well as how you think about Atlanta going forward?

Sure. I would say this, I mean, Atlanta grew by 18% year-over-year. When you look at the full year 2019 over full year 2018, so that's something that we're very excited about. It grew faster than that when you look at the first three quarters. And then I think in the fourth quarter, due to a couple of reasons that I'll talk about in a moment, I think it slowed down a bit. But at that point, you're pretty zoomed in. We're talking about looking at a single market for a couple of months. And I think we're trying to put out a lot of data to give you a broader understanding of the gains that we're seeing across the board, because we think it's important to broaden that perspective a little bit. Something that we do internally all the time is we're obviously looking at individual markets. We've got 160 of them, and we're tracking how those markets are doing month-to-month all the time. If we see a market bouncing around in a way that starts to look like maybe it's not just noise, there's something to understand there, we dig in and we try to understand about what's going on and we've been doing that for several years, I would say. When we do that that exercise generally yields staffing problems or shipping delays or something macroeconomic in that particular city. I can't think of a single time where that has yielded a belief where we think competition is the driver of what's happening in a given city. So we really don't think it's that. We think that Atlanta was probably impacted by the same things that impacted the entire business in Q4: Namely, we leaned into the Cyber Monday promotion less. And then we did have some…

Okay. And then when I look at the web traffic in the K, it implies a slowdown in the fourth quarter versus the third quarter. Any insights there? Obviously, still strong traffic, but what should we be thinking about? What are you doing to drive traffic, and maybe what happened in the fourth versus the third quarter?

Sure. I would go back to -- I would start with sales. We saw healthy growth in cars that we sold to customers and, obviously, very healthy growth in cars that we bought from customers going from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. And that happened despite leaning into the Cyber Monday promotion a little bit less. So, I think when you're seeing variation in traffic that is kind of not correlating super tightly with sales, that can often be just marketing channel mix differences and many other things. So yes, I wouldn't read too much into that. I think there can be a lot of variability in quality of traffic from different channels. And sometimes, you buy a lot of traffic at a low price per visitor and sometimes you buy high-quality traffic at a higher price per visitor. And just traffic alone is not necessarily the best measure to look at. That said, traffic has continued to grow very, very quickly. And so we're happy with that as well.

Okay, great. And the last one here. Just with regards to raising capital, how do you think about the capital structure of the company over the next couple of years?

Sure. So, we continue to be very focused on asset-based financing, which we think is the best way to capitalize the business. I think we've talked about this before, but automotive retail utilizes various types of capital to fund its working capital and its other investments, the main two being investment in inventory and investment in real estate. We have made great progress over the years in financing both of those efficiently and expect to continue to be able to do so in the future. As one data point there, so we recently entered into a $200 million sale leaseback agreement to finance our Charlotte IRC and our next three IRCs. After that, we intend to continue doing that going forward. And so I think we've been very pleased with the way that we capitalize the business, making use of the most efficient capital markets to fund the assets that we have, we think in the long run, that that is the best way to maximize return on equity for our shareholders, and we'll continue doing that going forward. In terms of the way the business is positioned today, we have over $600 million in total liquidity resources, taking into consideration everything on our balance sheet, which we believe gives us significant flexibility.

Okay, great. Appreciate it Mark and Ernie.

Hey, have a good one.

Our next question will come from Nat Schindler with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead.

Hi guys. Thanks for taking my question. Just wanted to dive into the retail unit growth projections that you're suggesting and compare it to kind of the market cohort data. It seems pretty conservative that you're going to slow down that dramatically, given that you're saying that your average 2013 to 2018 cohort was at 84%. And even if Nashville, and I forgot what was your other one in the second cohort, even if that one goes -- both of those go the way of Atlanta, you're still shifting, a huge number of markets will be in that kind of core, pretty high-growth rate average that you're talking about, including the 60 -- I would assume that 2019 markets act like -- in 2020, like the 2018 markets acted in 2019. And if that's the case, how are you going to decelerate all the way down to well below your average for even your three-year oldest cohort?

Sure. Well, I think you're looking at the same data that we're looking at. So, I think that's what's informing our guidance. And I think the only way that we would add on top of that is we did just have a very incredible growth year in both retail units and buying cars from customers. We think that we're set up very well to have another growth year again. Whenever you're growing that fast in total transactions, there's always going to be one or two things that pops up unexpectedly that we need to be ready for. And we're trying to make sure that we take all that into account. But I think you're looking at the same data, you'd characterize the cohort same way that we would. And then we're trying to roll that forward and make sure that we take into account just the operational realities of growing at this scale and speed.

Okay. And just to clarify, I know not -- looking at market numbers is somewhat useless because not all markets are the same, obviously. But if you're going to go to 73% to 75% coverage in this coming year, is it right to assume that you're going to add roughly the same number of markets kind of in the 60 range that you added this year?

We think we'll add more markets now. We expect to end the year at approximately 250 markets this year. [Indiscernible] Yes. So, we think we'll add more markets. Those markets will not be super large markets, right? You can kind of calculate the average size of those markets given the amount of population that we expect to serve. But I think markets are getting continually easier for us to add as our kind of fabric -- as our logistics fabric spreads out across the country, it gets easier and easier to add new markets. And so that's the number, I believe, is in the 20s, into the 40s and 60s. And now this year, we expect to be approximately 100 markets that we'll add. So that's definitely getting easier for us.

Sorry about that last question. I just misinterpreted that slide on page 11 or misread it. So obviously, that data was there. Thank you.

All good. Thank you.

Our next question will come from Brad Erickson with Needham and Company. Please go ahead.

Hi. Just a couple of follow-ups. One, as you buy more of these cars from retail customers, obviously, getting the nice tailwind to GPU, given you kind of talked about passing along some of those savings -- or in the form of savings to your customers, is it fair to assume you're continuing to kind of incorporate those GP tailwind, at least partially in your prices, I guess, making it even more competitive price-wise? That's the first one. And then the second one just related to the shift in the -- to the two-shelf securitization you talked about, anything to be read into there in terms of just the mix of your financing business here in 2020 going through Ally versus other investors that's contemplated in your guidance?

Sure. So, I'll hit the first one and, Mark, why don't you hit number two? In terms of price competitiveness, if you look through 2019, we've got very similar discounts relative to other competitors in the marketplace that we've had in the past. And so I think our pricing policies have been pretty similar across time. And so I think you can kind of think of those benefits that we're getting from buying more cars from customers is largely flowing through and feeding GPU, at least that's what happened in the last 12 months. So, hopefully, that's helpful color. And then, Mark, why don't you jump in on number two?

Sure. Yes. And then on the transition to the two-shelf securitization, we think that's a very natural evolution for our program. Obviously, we're really excited to get the securitization program up and running in 2019 and saw great success from that program in terms of the number of investors that we were able to reach and the impact on finance GPU. We think that the transition to two shelves is a natural evolution as we move to the long-term model. It expands your investor base. It gives investors greater liquidity. I think there's opportunity for more efficient capital structures and all those things, enable lower cost of funds over time. In terms of mix with Ally, we still have a great relationship with Ally. We're selling loans to them; expect to continue selling loans to them. And I think -- I would almost think of that as unrelated to the move to two shelves, which we think is just the right next step in our evolution and finance monetization.

Our final question will come from Lee Krowl with B. Riley FBR. Please go ahead.

Great guys. Thanks for sneaking me in here last. Two questions. First, just wanted to focus on other GPU and, namely, the ancillary services you guys attached to sales. Curious how that's impacted as the inventory becomes more diverse, and especially as you're buying cars from customers and the age fluctuates relative to the last couple of years? And then my second question is, as we head into the seasonally stronger year, particularly with tax, curious on changes to strategy from a year-over-year perspective now that you have more capacity in place to handle the higher volumes from buying cars from customers.

So, first question, I'll take on. Ancillary product GPU, that's obviously a place that we've made nice progress. I think there can be some correlations between ancillary product, GPU and vehicle mix. For example, if a car is within limited -- sorry, the manufacturer warranty, extended warranty, our vehicle service contract might be a little less attractive. Whereas if it's outside of manufacturer warranty, it might be a little more attractive. And so I think there can be some correlations between vehicle mix or other factors of the ancillary product attachment rates. All of those, of course, will be incorporated into our guidance.

And then on the strategy point heading into tax season and beyond in 2020, I don't think there's anything material to call out. I think we feel really good about how we're positioned right now. We're coming in with a really big inventory that's very diverse, more diverse than any inventory we've had. I think what we're always trying to do is appropriately size the business to be able to handle the volume that we see today and hopefully be able to quickly flex to handle the volume that we see as we move through these high-volume times. I think we're really well positioned. We're obviously growing extremely fast. So we'll be keeping a close eye on -- if we start to constrain in different places, then we'll be reacting just like we have in the past. So, I think nothing material to call out there, except that we're walking in a tax season in good shape operationally.

Thanks for taking my questions.

Thank you.

This will conclude our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks.

Well, thanks, everyone, for joining the call, and everybody -- but importantly thank you so much, everyone on team Carvana. This was another incredible year. And it's only possible because of how hard all of you work every single day. We really do appreciate it. We really do recognize it. So, thank you so much. Have a good one.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation and you may now disconnect.