Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Constellium Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Now I would like to hand the conference over to our first speaker today, Mr. Ryan Wentling, Director of Investor Relations. Sir, the floor is yours

Thank you, operator. I would like to welcome everyone to our fourth quarter and full year 2020 earnings call. On the call today are our Chief Executive Officer, Jean-Marc Germain; and our Chief Financial Officer, Peter Matt. After the presentation, we will have a Q&A session. A copy of the slide presentation for today’s call is available on our website at constellium.com, and today’s call is being recorded. Before we begin, I’d like to encourage everyone to visit the company’s website and take a look at our recent filings. Today’s call may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements include statements regarding the company’s anticipated financial and operating performance, future events and expectations and may involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. For a summary of specific risk factors that could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, please refer to the factors presented under the heading Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 20-F. All information in this presentation is as of the date of the presentation. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In addition, today’s presentation includes information regarding certain non-GAAP financial measures. Please see the reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures attached in today’s slide presentation, which supplement our IFRS disclosures. I would now like to hand the call over to Jean-Marc.

Thank you, Ryan. Good morning, good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for your interest in Constellium. I want to start by thanking the members of the Constellium team for their contributions in 2020. I am proud to say that Constellium rose to each of the many challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. I’d like to take a moment to specifically call out two examples. First, Constellium delivered extremely strong cost performance. Our cost flex of 92% was impressive again in the fourth quarter. For the full year, our cost flex was 90%. This is something we are very proud of. Second, we delivered on our commitment to free cash flow generation with €157 million in 2020. When combined with 2019, we have generated over €330 million of free cash flow. For perspective, that is about 20% of our current market cap in just two years. Now let’s discuss the highlights from our Q4 results. Shipments were 374,000 tons that’s up 2% compared to the fourth quarter of 2019. Revenue decreased 9% to €1.2 billion. This was primarily due to weaker price and mix and lower aerospace shipments. Our net income of €26 million compares to net income of €22 million in the fourth quarter of 2019. As you can see in the bridge on the right side of the slide, adjusted EBITDA was €111 million, a decline of €10 million, which was driven by lower results at A&T from weak aerospace demand, partially offset by strong performance at P&ARP. Lastly, free cash flow was €28 million in the quarter. Now let’s turn to Slide 6 and discuss our full year highlights. Shipments were 1.4 million tons, a decrease of 10% compared to 2019 due to impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic across each of our businesses. Revenue decreased 17% to €4.9…

Thank you, Jean-Marc, and thank you, everyone, for joining the call today. Turning now to Slide 9. Let’s focus on the P&ARP segment. Adjusted EBITDA of €82 million increased 31% compared to the fourth quarter of 2019. Volume was a €14 million tailwind as shipments increased 7% compared to the fourth quarter of 2019. Packaging rolled product shipments increased 5% and automotive rolled product shipments increased 12%, both on higher shipments in North America and Europe. Price and mix was a tailwind of €15 million from both automotive and packaging. Costs were a headwind of €7 million due to unfavorable metal costs, including higher alloying costs and inefficiencies related to a strike at Muscle Shoals, which affected the second half of December and was resolved on January 11. FX translation, which is noncash, was a headwind of €3 million in the quarter due to a weaker U.S. dollar. For the full year 2020, P&ARP generated record adjusted EBITDA of €291 million. Volume was a headwind due to the impact from COVID-19, notably in automotive and European packaging. Costs were a tailwind due to strong cost control, notably on lower maintenance, labor and overhead costs and improved recovery. FX translation for the year was a headwind of €3 million. Now turn to Slide 10, and let’s focus on the A&T segment. Adjusted EBITDA of €13 million decreased 72% compared to the fourth quarter of 2019. Volume was a headwind of €38 million on 55% of lower aerospace shipments year-over-year. TID showed signs of improvement in the fourth quarter, with shipments increasing 15% compared to 2019. Price and mix was a headwind of €21 million due to a weaker mix in aerospace and the lower share of aerospace shipments relative to TID. Costs were a tailwind of €27 million, primarily related to…

Thank you, Peter. As I noted earlier, sustainability is offering us great opportunities. It is driving megatrends across all our end markets, namely, we are seeing increasing focus on lightweighting in transportation, the electrification of the automotive fleet and customer preference for infinitely recyclable aluminum cans. Constellium is well positioned to be a significant beneficiary of each of these megatrends. I would also like to highlight our diverse and balanced portfolio of end market exposures. This diversification proved invaluable during the COVID-19 pandemic. So let’s turn now to packaging. Packaging is a core market for Constellium and represented 40%of our revenue in 2020. Packaging, again, displayed its recession resilience during the pandemic as demand from our can customers remained strong. The growth in demand for aluminum cans is underpinned by consumer preference versus other alternatives, such as plastics. Aluminum cans are infinitely recyclable, making them the most sustainable beverage packaging container and a contributor to the development of a secular economy. To meet this growing demand, our customers have announced new can lines in both North America and Europe, which should drive can sheet demand growth for years to come. Now let’s move to automotive. Automotive represented 27% of our revenues in 2020. Here also, Constellium is well positioned in both sheet and extrusions to realize the benefits of the secular shift to aluminum in automotive and the electrification of the automotive fleet. We expect electric vehicles to increasingly win share. Electric vehicles need to be light to meet their range objectives, which makes aluminum the logical material of choice for auto body sheet, crash management systems and battery enclosures. We are seeing increased demand from electric vehicle platforms in our auto body sheet order books in North America and Europe, and we continue to serve many electric vehicle platforms…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Mr. Curt Woodworth of Credit Suisse. Sir, the floor is yours. Mr. Curt Woodworth, your line is open.

Can you hear me?

Yes, we can. Good morning.

Okay. Hi. First question, just on packaging, two-part question. One is, can you give us an update on the debottlenecking efforts that you had ongoing at Muscle Shoals? I think it was for roughly 75 to 100 kt, and I assume a lot of that was going to trickle into packaging. And I know some of it incrementally was going to go into auto as well. And then can you also give us an update on kind of the cadence of packaging contract resets? I believe you had a small amount repriced this year and a much larger chunk is going to reprice in 2022 and 2023. And if you can give any color on kind of how you see profitability changing for that part of your business going forward would be helpful.

Sure. So on the first part of your question on the debottlenecking, we are making a very good progress. I’m very pleased with it. And if you noted in our shipments in Q4, they’re up 5% against the prior year. So that’s evidence of our ability to find incremental opportunities. And we are well on track to achieve the 75%, and I think I alluded to the fact that we’re expecting even a little bit more. So we’re very optimistic about our ability to debottleneck and sell those tons in the context of a good market in can sheet. Regarding the contracts, well, you’re right that more is repricing next year than this year. I continue to be optimistic about price development for us, and we’re seeing some benefits in 2021. We are expecting to see more in 2022. And that will happen, again, as contracts mature. But remember that on average, we got five-year contracts, 20% or 15%, 25%, that’s renewed every year. So it’s not like you’ve got a big bump, but you should see expanding margins. And you’re seeing there some better margins in P&ARP at the moment, which we – is reflected in our earnings. So we expect to continue to see some progress. So can sheet is a good market for us. It’s a good market for – cans are a good market for our customers, and it’s good to see that it’s making its way across the supply chain.

Okay. That’s helpful. And then with respect to the recycling facility, the 60,000 ton project, and you alluded to evaluating potentially another location, I assume, to process that recyclable material. Can you just kind of give us any more color on what that project could look like and potential CapEx associated with it?

Sure. So we are still in – not fully decided on exactly the technology, the size and all that. So what we can say is, at least 60,000 tons, and that’s actually consistent with the commitment we’ve made in the bond. But it is likely could be bigger. We’ll have to make sure that it’s a project that has very good returns for us, and that’s key criterion in deciding how to, what I mentioned, pursue. The other thing I can say is even though we’re in the early stage of design, it’s pretty clear there’s some rule of thumb or in terms of how to size CapEx in for recycled centers. And typically, you’re talking around $1,000 or euros per ton of installed capacity. So that gives you an idea. And those projects typically take a good couple of years to complete, right? When you’ve got detailed engineering and all that, that’s costing you some money as part of it, and then it takes two, three years to build it and start it. So the spread of CapEx is going to be very manageable for the company over the course of several years.

Okay. And then just last question. When you look at your business, I mean, I think you have pretty good visibility across a lot of it and even within aerospace, I understand there’s destocking. But Airbus has laid out some relatively specific production guidance, at least along the lines of the A320 in the next couple of years. So I’m just curious, what’s the hesitancy to provide a range of a full year guidance at this point? And is that something that you think you would look to do next quarter?

Yes. So we like to be reasonably conservative, and we like to be reasonably sure. And we want – we take giving guidance very seriously, and we want to be able to give you guidance within a reasonable – reasonably precise range, which we don’t feel we’re able to do just now. However, we are giving guidance on free cash flow for the full year, which is a little bit easier than EBITDA because, obviously, you’ve got some – if EBITDA is very – is higher because you’re shipping more, then you got more working capital, it dampens a little bit the impact on free cash flow. So the visibility is improving, but we are not yet at the stage where we feel we can give you the guidance we’d like to give you, which is a reasonably tight guidance for the full year. And I’m sorry to disappoint that we have a conservative approach to life.

Yup. No, I understood. Thank you very much.

You’re welcome.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Josh Sullivan from Benchmark Company.

Good morning, Josh.

Sir, your line is open.

Good morning. Yes. Just a question on the overall automotive exposure and outlook. Curious on the automotive OEM, 30, 60, 90-day order schedules. How are those lining up? I know you said you don’t see too much impact from the semi issue and the weather event. That’s helpful. But do those 90-day order schedules, are they showing more promise?

They are – they continue to be strong. And I mean, the trend that I highlighted in Q4, when you look at every segment, right, I’m talking beyond automotive, right? But every segment is at or above last year by quite a bit, except for aerospace, obviously, we’re seeing that continued strength in the markets. But I guess the year we lived through last year is making us a little bit cautious. And we – so we’re looking at it with a cautious optimism, and it’s certainly in automotive, and it’s driven by the fact that the markets continue to be good. But remember, aluminum continues to penetrate in automotive. We see gains in share of aluminum in vehicles, and that’s further amplifying the strength of the underlying market.

And then some of the auto OEMs have reported so far, talking about how they’re supporting the suppliers and they’re going to take a hit on their own cash flow. Is that part of your confidence in that $100 million free cash flow outlook? Are the payments from the OEMs a little better than the order flow upticks at this point?

No. I wish they were, but I think they are dedicating their support to other suppliers that may need it more than we do. Peter?

No visible change in that regard, Josh.

Great. Thanks for taking the time.

Their generosity doesn’t extend to us.

Which is a good sign, which is a good sign.

Thanks.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Chris Terry from Deutsche Bank. Sir, your line is open.

Thank you. Well done on the cash flow in 2020, in particular. I had a couple of questions. Just in terms of the impact from the autos, I know you’ve touched on this a little bit already, but what you’re saying conceptually is that over the course of 2021, you think that there’s an ability to catch it up and the impact should be relatively modest, even though you have included some in that €10 million for the first quarter. But you think there’s nothing alarming at this stage to indicate that there could be setbacks further on, and you’d probably catch it up through the year?

Yes. I think it’s fair to say that the €10 million we’re highlighting as the headwind in Q1 is really a one-off. Well, Q1 is not over yet. But that said, the strike factor is – it’s done, it’s behind us. The weather, it’s done, it’s behind us. The snow has melted. The roads are passable so that people can come to work and trucks can leave and deliver to customers. So that’s behind us. The semiconductor shortage, I think the signs are encouraging, but the worst is behind us, but we have to see. So if the semiconductors don’t get worse, I think there’s a fair chance we can close the gap and recover what we lost in Q1.

Okay. And then just for the business overall, in terms of Europe versus U.S., you touched on some of this for the specific end markets. But just wondering sort of higher level and maybe focusing several years out, which of the markets are you more encouraged by just from a regional point of view, where when you think about the ESG trends and some of the bigger picture trends in the industry, you are pretty comfortable being roughly 50-50 exposed to the two regions? Or is there a preference to go further into one than the other?

Yes. So at the macro level, America has proven through many, many cycles that it rebounds from crisis stronger than Europe does, but that’s a very high level consideration. If I look specifically for us, can in Europe looks very good just as in the U.S. So remember, we’ve got twice as much can sheet, roughly, exposure in the U.S. than we do in Europe. Automotive is strong in Europe and continues to be strong. And we’re exposed to read the higher end of the market, and that’s also going very well, especially in a crisis where the impact on the consumers has been differentiated and those customers that would be buying the cars and which all tend to be more shielded from the crisis than others. So we continue to see a strength in Europe in both can sheet and auto sheet and auto structures as well. So we’re quite optimistic. It feels like, overall, the industrial markets in Europe will take longer and will be a little bit more challenged in their recovery process and in the U.S. We’re seeing TID in the U.S. be very strong, and it’s still weak in Europe. And I think that trend will – is likely to continue because, again, Europe recovers typically less quickly from crisis than America does.

The only thing I’d add there, Chris, is that the ESG trends in Europe are stronger. So maybe that gives a little bit of a boost to Europe. But – and the second thing I’d add is that, again, we’ve really benefited from the diversified platform that we have, and we don’t want to give that up. So we’ll maintain the balance that we have going forward.

Thank you. And just one, might be for Peter. But on the working capital for the first half of the year, I mean, you’ve given the guidance for the key items, think about the free cash flow over the full year. I just wondered maybe if you can talk to sort of how you’re thinking about that progression and maybe some of the working capital considerations.

Sure, sure. Happy to do it. So first, I just want to take a step back and comment on kind of, I think, what was really great performance over the last couple of years on trade working capital. And if you look at the numbers, we generated a lot of cash in 2019. We generated a decent amount of cash in 2020 from trade working capital. So we’re coming off of the back of two strong years of performance. As our business ramps and as our growth projects come in, there’s definitely going to be a consumption of trade working capital. And I think you saw evidence of that in the fourth quarter, where kind of if you look at the trade working capital on the cash flow statement, you’ll see it’s kind of a use of about €30 million, right? So when we look at 2021, we expect the trade working capital is going to be a use of cash in the year. It’s a little early to define what that use means because – in terms of a quantum, and that’s because obviously, it’s hard to see right now – for the same reason that we’re kind of not giving EBITDA guidance, it’s hard to see what these ramps are going to look like. Does aerospace come back in the second half? That could be a big differentiator. So I think we can say that we believe it’s going to be a use in the year given our historic performance and what we see in front of us right now, but I think we’re – we need a little more time to quantify what that use is going to be.

Okay. Thanks for that. And then just one more, if I can, just on aero. Just wondering if you could give us a bit more of a flavor of kind of conversations you’re having with those companies and maybe the timing of when you’ll know how the back half shapes up and just remind us how far out you negotiate deliveries for your product.

Yes. So Chris, typically, we’ve got six months of good visibility and up to six months of good or firm visibility. So we are not yet at a point where we can say exactly how the last – second half of the year will unfold. The thing that makes it difficult from our customers is because these are long supply chains, it is difficult to exactly assess what product is available at what stage in the production process between us and the final aircraft. And therefore, it’s difficult for us to get a good feel for when destocking is over, and they really need to realign build rates with supply rates. So that’s where we are. Still, obviously, the uncertainty will dissipate as we get closer to July. But at the moment, it’s still uncertain as to what happens in the second half.

Okay. That’s it for me. Thanks, guys.

Thanks, Chris.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Christian Georges from Societe Generale. Sir, the line is open.

Thank you very much. And good afternoon. I was going to ask you a question on your auto extrusions. I see the shipments in the fourth quarter were flat compared to the third quarter. In steel casting, Europe, in particular, we’ve seen it’s a strong increase late fourth quarter because the OEMs had somewhat reduced their inventories, and that boosted demand from suppliers. Is that not the case for you? And looking to the next few quarters, should we expect perhaps a sharper increase in shipments in that particular activity?

Yes. So we had a very strong pickup, Christian, in June, July. And I think the issue with the inventories being depleted, may have been different from – for us and for others and steel or – so that’s one factor. The other factor is there’s a platform in the U.S. where we are quite exposed that has suffered more from a semiconductor shortage. So that is also explaining a little bit why we don’t see that continued growth in the fourth quarter. I think this is temporary. And again, I mean, aluminum is penetrating. The cars we run typically sell well. When the semiconductor issue is behind us, we’ll see a resumption of growth.

Okay. And see, on automotive, but on your rolled shipments, 62,000 tons, that’s the best quarter you’ve had to date. If we project ourselves end of the year or into 2022, what would you reckon this number would be roughly? I mean are we looking at a 10,000 ton increase within 12 months? Or is it perhaps too optimistic?

Well, the year is not over, and we don’t like to give that level of precision in our outlook. But I would expect our rolled product shipment to continue to grow, maybe not at the same clip as what you’re seeing right now in one quarter. Again, one quarter doesn’t make a trend. And also, we’re very focused on maximizing the value-add and maximizing the profit. So we are not going after every ton out there. We really want to go after the most profitable products where we bring something different to the market. So I expect to see continued growth, and I expect to see continued margin improvement in our segment.

Okay. Very clear. Thank you very much. One last thing. The increasing amount of recycling in your mix as per your 10% target. Does this come with potentially some lower cost of aluminum for you or at least to your selling price?

Yes. I mean, good question, Christian. Absolutely. We’re doing – we’re very excited about sustainability because it’s good for the planet, but also because it makes more money for us and our shareholders. That’s a very important factor. So yes, that lowers for us, the cost of aluminum, and that’s how we make money, and we justify investing in more recycled capacity.

Great. Thank you very much.

Sure.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Fields from Bank of America. Sir, the line is open.

Hi, everyone. I want to ask a couple of things. You obviously did good work cleaning up your highest coupon with your refinancing. What’s kind of the next priority for the capital structure? Is it the 2024 notes, which also have a high coupon and step down in May? Or what’s sort of – what’s the next iteration?

Yes. Good question. So we really – we like the position that we sit in right now because, as you know, our nearest maturity is 2024, and so we’ve got the luxury of kind of taking our time and finding the right opportunity to do a financing. As you saw in our February financing, we were extremely pleased to achieve a 3.75% dollar coupon. So we’re looking at the capital structure. We’re looking at kind of all of the different components of the debt stack. And as we see opportunities to jump into the market and kind of get attractive financing, we’ll certainly evaluate those. But we haven’t made any decisions on that at this point.

Okay. Fair enough. Obviously, you’ve got a lot of latitude and issued below 4%. So the next thing is basically the can space. You talked a little bit about the contract resets, but all the signs are just so bullish on that market. I think Coke and Pepsi warned about price increases around 10%. You’ve seen so many capacity additions by the can producers. One of them was just bought in a SPAC. I mean all the signs are there. What – do you sort of get concerned about your capacity in the can sheet market in North America? Is the bottlenecking you did at Muscle Shoal adequate? When do you feel the need to maybe invest in more capacity?

So yes. No, that’s a fantastic opportunity for us, and I grow more and more optimistic every quarter that goes by. I am not concerned about our ability to increase our capacities. As I mentioned earlier, we’re well on track for our 75,000 tons objective. We could be doing more. And I think we’ll be doing more within the framework of what we’ve decided to do. Before I want to go further, we have some investments to make, and we’ll make those investments when we get a very good return on them. And we know what they are, we know what we need to do. So it’s just a matter of aligning the planet and getting us in a place where we’re very excited from a value creation standpoint on the opportunities we have, and I think that time will come. It’s not only dependent on us, it’s going to be in lock steps with our customers. But I think this is, as you point out, a very good backdrop for us and a very good market context.

All right. Fair enough. And good luck this year.

Thanks, Matthew.

Thanks, Matthew.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Sean Wondrack from Deutsche Bank. Sir, your line is open.

Hi, guys. And congrats on your inaugural sustainability-linked bond offering.

Thank you, Sean.

Thank you, Sean.

Two quick questions, if I may. So firstly, do you expect to continue to reap labor savings related to European government assistance during 2021? And if so, could you please provide a rough magnitude relative to benefits received in 2020?

Yes. Good question, Sean. So obviously, if you look at the shape, so it’s €22 million for the full year. The biggest portion of that happened, obviously, in the second quarter and then it tailed off in the third quarter, and you can see and we kind of cited the number in the fourth quarter, right? As we go into 2021 with really all operations except for aerospace running back at numbers that are at rates that are well in excess of where we were in 2019, that number will be a much smaller number. There’s a – the program still exists, obviously, across Europe. So we will get some benefit from it in the aerospace, in the A&T segment. But it’ll be – I’d say, if you’re thinking about it for a full year, it’s probably less than €5 million for the full year, I would think, would be a decent number, probably one million or so a quarter or something like that.

Okay. So nothing material. I appreciate the clarity there.

Yes.

Yes. And then just following up on the capital structure. Is it fair to expect that – may pursue additional sustainability-linked offerings moving ahead as you move to refi your cap structure, considering your heightened focus on ESG lately?

Yes. So we had a very good experience, as you know, in the financing we just did. We like the concept of putting our money where our mouth is. So we believe our story kind of lends itself to some of the trends in sustainability that are out there, and so I think we are prepared to kind of put, I guess, our cost at risk to achieve the goals that we’ve set for ourselves. So I think it’s logical that we would – that we continue to pursue that.

That’s great. As always, very helpful. Thank you. And good luck in 2021.

Thanks, Sean.

There are no further questions at this time. Turning the call over to Mr. Jean-Marc Germain, CEO of Constellium. Sir, please continue.

Well, thank you very much all for attending. And as you can see, I hope we’ve demonstrated that Constellium is able to generate significant free cash flow in good weather or bad weather, and we look forward to a less exciting year in 2021 with still very substantial free cash flow generation. Thank you, everyone. Goodbye.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s conference call. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect.