Well, here's -- no your thinking allowed and that's fair. So first of all, let me say the following and I'll address the Gallagher issue specifically in my response. To begin with, we have focused very heavily on innovation, and we're able to do that for a multitude of reasons. One is we actually have a very sharp, in my opinion, information technology group that has actually put in play, if you will, 600 bots in terms of robotic process automation. In addition to that, we're also one of the first ones and actually we've announced the escape of water, water sensors that's actually rolling out with a top 10 client that will generate the first notice of loss as well as impact, if you will, positively all our global service lines. In addition to that, we tested our solution, I'll call as TruLook, which is branded, and what TruLook is really the triaging of claims very rapidly. We tested this with a top 15 insurer. And the amazing thing with this is, it is dropping loss adjusting cost by 63% and cycle time by 27%. We are a company with low leverage unlike our competitors which are very heavily levered. We also have more financial flexibility; therefore, putting a lot of dollars behind the innovation in a very, very efficient manner. Large carriers may have the resources. Small and medium carriers do not have the resources, but they focus more, if you will, on their growth and underwriting while we're bringing the solution and claims. Our single-minded focus, our very existence is to be the best claims management company on a global basis. That is our focus, and that's what we're going to be best at.
Now I think I may have indirectly answered your comment on the brokerage business. I would say, at this time, Greg, we're not looking at the brokerage business because we see so much potential in the claims management world. Just as a snapshot, there are about 6,000 carriers in the United States; 2,500 carriers in P&C, of which over 2,000 are sub-$5 billion who look for companies like us, if you will, to give the solution on the total claims from end-to-end. And I think there is that much whitespace that we're going after, and that's why not only are we investing in innovation, we're investing heavily in the sales force and heavily focusing on ramping up in these verticals that we have identified as large opportunities. So to me, I think any company to be successful has to be very singularly focused and actually identify what we should not get into and what we should get into. Rightly so, you asked a very good question because I came from outside the industry and I did examine exactly what you said and I realized the whitespace in our existing industry is so large in claims that we can continue to grow the business.