Welcome to the Columbia Sportswear Company Second Quarter 2017 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Ron Parham, Senior Director of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications for Columbia Sportswear. Thank you, Mr. Parham. Please go ahead.

All right. Thanks, Bob. Good afternoon. Thanks for joining us to discuss Columbia Sportswear Company's Second Quarter and First Half Financial Results and Updated 2017 Outlook. In addition to the earnings release, we furnished an 8-K containing a detailed CFO commentary explaining our results and the assumptions behind our full year outlook. The CFO commentary is also available on our Investor Relations website. With me today on the call are Chairman of the Board, Gert Boyle; President and Chief Executive Officer, Tim Boyle; Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Tom Cusick; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Jim Swanson; and Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, Peter Bragdon. Gert will start us off by covering the safe harbor reminder.

Good afternoon. This conference call will contain forward-looking statements regarding Columbia's business opportunities and anticipated result of operation. Please bear in mind that forward-looking information is subject to many risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from what is projected. Many of these risks and uncertainties are described in Columbia's annual report on Form 10-K and subsequent filing with the SEC. Forward-looking statements in this conference call are based on our current expectations and beliefs, and we do not undertake any duty to update any of the forward-looking statement after the date of this conference call to conform the forward-looking statement to actual results or to change in our expectation.

Thanks, Gert. And I'd also like to point out that during the call, we may reference constant currency net sales growth, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. A reconciliation of constant currency net sales to sales as reported under U.S. GAAP is included in the supplemental financial tables accompanying our earnings release, along with management's rationale for referencing this non-GAAP measure. Following our prepared remarks, we'll host a Q&A period, during which we'll try to limit the call - the questions to 2 per caller so we can get to everyone within the hour. And I'll turn it over to Tim now.

Thanks, Ron. Welcome, everyone, and thanks for joining us this afternoon. We're pleased to report slightly better-than-expected second quarter and first half results and a midyear update to our 2017 outlook. As you've seen in our press release in the CFO commentary, we delivered a solid, on-plan first half featuring growth from three of our four brands and all 4 geographic regions. Directly on pace with our full year outlook, consolidated sales grew 3% as reported and 4% in constant currency, while net income grew 4% to $24.5 million or $0.35 per diluted share. These results include a $5.2 million of expense related to the operating model assessment that we began in February, which equates to $3.3 million after-tax, or $0.05 per diluted share. Excluding these costs, first half net income grew 18%. Before I discuss our results and outlook in more detail, I want to offer more context on the operating model assessment and provide a framework for the next phase of our project, which we launched in June. Over our long history, our company has encountered numerous episodes of structural change in its primary markets and has responded by assessing the situation and identifying new growth opportunities, then realigning resources and developing new capabilities to capitalize on those opportunities. As a result, we have successfully created what is today a multibrand, multichannel global business with solid financial foundation. With the U.S. retail sector in a period of accelerating structural change, we launched a comprehensive assessment of our business to determine how to enhance our capabilities to drive future growth. We have embarked on a separate from a position of strength, including a current outlook that anticipates sales and earnings growth, and a very powerful balance sheet with more than $600 million in cash and no long-term debt. We…

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Bob Drbul with Guggenheim.

I guess, the two questions I have, Tim, the first one, on inventories, generally, you had some gross margin pressure this quarter as you liquidated some aged inventory. I was wondering if you could just give us an update on how you feel the channel is competitively either with Columbia product or with other product heading into the fall around the inventory situation. And then the second question that I have is, within your demand creation spending, I've seen the Columbia brand show up at some major golf events, some Top 10 finishes in the U.S. Open and in the British Open, and I just wondered, how much of your time are you guys now spending around some of the endorsement sides of it? And can you just maybe comment around your efforts to increase the visibility of the business a little bit more?

Sure. Well, first of all, on the inventory situation, I think in the market generally, I think it's reasonably clean. We've taken a particularly cautious approach based on just the uncertainty in the U.S. market around some retailers that may be in duress during the season. So - but I think in general, the market is fairly clean. And I would say that would probably be true as well in Europe. We've seen periods of time where we had warm weather. I think the various vendors in the retails have taken a more cautious approach. I think it's - we're in the position of pretty clean inventories. As it relates to the demand creation, yes, we had - we're very fortunate that we had some solid performance by our golfers. And I think what we're finding is that a combination of investment in social media and - so more traditional paid advertising in TV and in print, coupled with some promotional activities we said with the U.K. parks, UTMB and with the golfers, I think it makes a better connection with the business. And then we'll have some additional information to share with you at the end of the next quarter about some other activities we've got planned as well.

Great. If I could just sneak in a third question, Tim, can you comment a little bit around your Amazon relationship and how that's proceeding for you guys around the business?

Certainly. Well, we have many, many great customers, and we don't really touch specifically about any particular one. But we have a long-time relationship with the people at Amazon and with many of our brands, and the arrangement's been good. We currently don't have a 10% customer. So it's not dominating our business the way it may others. But frankly, there's opportunities, I think, continued advancement at Amazon for us and for the brands that we own. And we want to make sure that we utilize the other opportunities at Amazon, including search and some other marketing potential, that would help us grow the brands really everywhere.

Our next question comes from the line of Susan Anderson with FBR Capital Markets.

I was wondering if maybe you can kind of talk about, as you look out to the back half, it sounds like inventory is very clean out there. So if we do happen to have a colder winter this year, do you have the ability to chase product? Or how do you see that playing out? And then also just to touch on wholesale a little bit, as we look beyond the back half of this year, when would you expect it to kind of normalize or at least become flat? Is that - do you think that could happen in 2018?

Certainly. Well, as it relates to increasing inventory, we've been at this for a long time, meaning, 40 - north of 40 years in the outerwear business and the winter products business. And so we pretty much - we believe we have it dialed. So as it relates to chase, there wouldn't be a significant impact on the top line of the business if we had an unusually cold weather winter or even a more normal winter, but our gross margins would improve. So we would see some impact on margin, but we don't have enough inventory to chase a lot of extra sales if cold weather appears. And then as it relates to normalized wholesale business, I think the company has an enormous opportunity to gain market share. We've shown we can do that, and we've continued to gain market share certainly in the U.S. Unfortunately, the pie has shrunk a bit. We still think there's opportunity for us to get better in certain categories, which are high volume. So for us, I think our wholesale business can be stronger and, hopefully, will be going forward.

Yes, Susan, I might add. This is Jim speaking. With the timing shift that we're seeing in the U.S. wholesale business out of the third quarter and into the fourth, anticipating the U.S. wholesale business being down, call it, a low double-digit figure in Q3, but we are anticipating that returning to more of a growth posture in the fourth quarter with that shift that's there.

Got it. Okay. And then just one more, if I could fit in, on the SOREL business. It looks like some nice spring growth, obviously, still small, but maybe if you could just talk about kind of what products consumers really responded to and kind of where you - the opportunity for the spring part of the business going forward?

Yes. I don't want to say it's surprising, but we're thrilled with the results on the sandal, the adoption of sandals under the SOREL brand in the U.S. And so I think that's probably the area where we saw the biggest uptake and where there's frankly the biggest opportunity. We've also had some great early selling on lightweight fall product. So I think Mark and his team are doing a great job at de-winterizing the brand to the extent we can, and the good results for spring were terrific and, again, in the sandal category.

Our next question comes from the line of Camilo Lyon with Canaccord Genuity.

I'm curious to know if coming out of the assessment or at least the initial part of the assessment, if there were any changes in how you're viewing your wholesale distribution from the perspective of maybe shutting underperforming doors or focusing on online third-party wholesale accounts versus brick and mortars? Or is there any change in how you're fueling that piece of your business?

No, we haven't changed our focus at all on project - the Project CONNECT has not changed our focus as it relates to the methods of distribution. I mean, frankly, we think there's enormous opportunity with our wholesale partners where we can gain market share and be much more successful. And a larger contributor to their success, if we follow the tenets that we've set out in Project CONNECT, which is to, first and foremost, have a very efficient product offering but, more importantly, add marketing dollars, demand creation dollars, which will raise the brand's values and the product's salability. So that's where we're going to be focusing our time and effort because we basically consider ourselves to be a supplier of products to retailers, and that's where we're focusing our efforts in a large part under Project CONNECT.

So would that look like more shop-in-shops build-outs within your wholesale partner? Is that how do you envision it?

Yes. Just as a component of demand creation, we think we can help our wholesale partners by making our products look better at retail, have higher value, so more merchandise is sold at full price. And then just increasing the demand for the product by targeted efforts, whether it be social media or our customers, e-com performance or activities around sponsorship and other processes to make a closer emotional connection for the products through our wholesale partners.

Okay, great. And then just my next question, I'm wondering if you could help us understand or rank order the strength within your wholesale partners. In other words, if you could say, the specialties is performing the best, sporting goods in the department stores or - I'm just curious to understand where the consumer seems to be heading more towards for your products. Is there one channel that's starting to outperform the other?

Yes, I think if I look at the company globally, where our greatest successes are is in the sporting goods channel, and that's where we've had historically the best adoption of our products and it's where consumers who are looking for protective products like we generate, whether it's protection from the sun or protection from the cold, that's where the bulk of our successes have been. And I think that's where consumers are looking to find those kinds of products. We're not immune to the impact of department store softness, whether it be in China or in North America. So I would say sporting goods.

Great. And then just finally from me, can you highlight some of the product launches that you're excited for, for this fall season, fall, winter season that might help drive some incremental activity and excitement around the brand?

Certainly. Well, based on the fact that it's cold in many parts of the world, we're going to be focusing on our campaign around Columbia Warmth and Columbia Warm as we have a number of proprietary components within our apparel, including Omni-Heat and TurboDown, which can make our products perform superior. But we also have a significant business in our PFG products, which have the advantage of not only being considered protection for sunny places and warm places, but they have a more year-round appeal in the southern part of the United States. So they don't get marked down as much, and it provides higher percent of profitability for our retailers.

Our next question comes from the line of Lindsay Mann with Goldman Sachs.

I wanted to ask about Project CONNECT and the global retail platform implementation. I know that you're still in sort of design and exploration phases of these, but as you consider once these explorations come to conclusion and you're getting to work on implementation, what are some of the margin implications of these endeavors? So should we be thinking about a period of higher investment for the next year or 2 with any revenue or efficiencies to offset? Or maybe just updating your margin algorithm over the next couple years as we sort of incorporate the impact of these projects, how we should be thinking about that.

Certainly. Why don't I just give you at a high level again some summary, and then I'll ask Tom to get more granular. But at the end of the day, Project CONNECT is going to help us to identify those legacy activities that have been happening throughout the company, which, just for whatever reason, either don't apply or don't offer the kinds of returns for the investment that we've been putting on them. So the hope is that we'll generate significant savings to be put towards improvement of our operating margin performance as well as demand creation, where we know we're underspending. As it relates to the platform, we've been operating our DTC business globally with, you could argue, archaic systems. They're certainly disparate. We have separate systems in Korea and in Japan, North America, Europe. And so we believe that by harmonizing those systems, we'll be performing at a higher level, and we'll be providing our investors with a larger return. But maybe I'll ask Tom to get a little bit more specific on that.

Yes, Lindsay. So as it relates to the retail platform, so our goal is to globalize the business for both our brick-and-mortar and our e-commerce businesses on the - a single platform. So that will include both the front-end POS system, the order management system and the TRM component so that we can basically create a much more holistic omni-channel environment for both our business and the consumer, which we ultimately believe will be able to drive more value out of inventory and out of our consumer base. So that is the long-term objective.

Can you help us understand what the associated expenses are for both Project CONNECT and the GRP initiatives and when the benefits will flow through and how we should be thinking about - I know you - and I'm not looking for 2018 guidance, but how we should be thinking about the margin impact from these.

Yes, maybe I'll start this and let Jim jump in, as I am pretty heavily involved in both these projects. So I would say the cost side of the equation is somewhat of a moving component in terms of the retail platform as we're in the early design phase. I think it would be safe to say, the cost of this initiative will be significantly lower than the SAP/ERP implementation that we're in the late innings on. And so we'll have more to offer as those plans come together on the retail initiative. And then with Project CONNECT, I would say, on that project as well, some of those costs are a function of business cases that are under development, and the timing of completion of development and approval will depend on where those investments, when and if those investments happen second half of this year into '18 as well as the associated benefits. So with that being said, I would say it's a little premature to provide detailed financial guidance on either these projects, but as the financial information becomes available to us, we'll make sure we're communicating that properly with the investment community.

Our next question comes from the line of Jonathan Komp with Robert W. Baird.

First question just on the guidance for the year. I noticed just a slight increase on the profitability, and I was hoping you could maybe talk about what factors drove the increase for the full year profit guidance.

Yes, you'll see that in the CFO commentary, Jonathan, the - essentially, the only shift there from an operating income performance standpoint, we've really maintained our prior outlook. There's a couple-cent change in the outlook on the upper end of the range from $2.82 to $2.84. It's essentially an adjustment in our nonoperating income. So it's yield on our cash balances, and also, we've repaid an outstanding loan from our China joint venture with a related party there, so no longer having the interest expense charges on that. And so the combination of those 2 things is really driving that $0.02 change. That's it.

Okay, great. And then I just want to clarify again on the guidance. I know you had $5.2 million of expenses tied to the realignment in the first half. It doesn't look like you excluded those from the results. But I just want to know, were those included in your guidance and are they included in your guidance today or can you just reconcile that?

Yes. So the full year outlook that we've provided in maintaining the outlook that we provided in April, neither of them included either the cost that we anticipate incurring through the balance of the year nor do they include the $5.2 million that we've incurred on a year-to-date basis. And then in terms of our Q2 results, yes, certainly, we've reported those on a GAAP basis and then given you just the disclosure in terms of what the expenses are there included in those results of $5.2 million year-to-date and $4 million in the second quarter.

Okay. So if we're including those in the model, then we should think about your full year profit guidance really being $251 million to $260 million. I'm a little unclear exactly how you're handling that. So maybe any more color?

Well, I think, essentially, the $5.2 million we've incurred year-to-date is about $0.05. And so I think you can extend that to the range that we've provided, so our $272 million to $284 million, adjust that $0.05 downward, and that's essentially what we've provided on a year-to-date basis. And of course, as we learn more in terms of what we expect to incur and/or the benefit in the back half of the year, we'll provide that to you. But at this stage, there's not a lot more to share at this point.

Okay, great. And then just the second question I had was related to your wholesale relationship and maybe specifically in the sporting goods category. Since they've talked about it publicly, I know Dick's has mentioned introducing a private label brand in the outerwear space. So I'm just wondering if you could just kind of share any thoughts on those actions and just broadly how you're faring with some of the main sporting goods customers.

Certainly. Yes. Well, every single customer we have of any scale has a private label business that adds to their total profitability, and they generally manage them well. We have a great relationship with the people at Dick's, and we're close to that situation and basically feel that we have a strong relationship and our business there will continue to improve as our demand creation efforts bear fruit. I might just point out, we have an enormously good relationship with a company in Europe, Decathlon, which has a much greater penetration in private label than anybody in the U.S., and our business there has been quite strong, especially the footwear, with some solid performance, of a particular footwear product. So we're used to navigating the waters of private label as it relates to our wholesale customers, and I think we do a great job of making sure that our products are compelling alongside others.

Our next question comes from the line of Eric Tracy with Buckingham.

Tim, for you, as you think about the shift, this is, call it, second, third year in a row as we've seen retailers obviously trying to buy closer to need. But discerning between the seasonality aspect of it and kind of what's transpired over the last couple of years just versus the structural element to it, could you maybe just speak to that? And then as you think about the supply chain, I know it's difficult to evolve that in any meaningful way, but maybe just speak to that dynamic and your views on it.

Certainly. I just want to make sure I understand your question. So you - I mean, in terms of how does the company navigate seasonality as it relates to the kinds of products that we make?

Well, not necessarily, no. I'm just trying to get to, is it seasonality driven, these shifts, do you believe, or, again, more structural in nature given the disruption to domestic retail?

Right. Well, we always talk about the company's heavy reliance on products that are sold, that are winter-related, whether it be the U.S., Europe, Asia as well as the timing of the major holidays around Christmas for gift giving, et cetera. So when you combine those things, the business is heavily reliant in the quarters in the fourth quarter, really, globally. I - there's lots of discussion around global warming, and I think the company has done a great job of approaching that problem by having a strong sportswear business centered on warm weather apparel, including our PFG product. So I think the company's considered a solid and, in fact, innovative provider of protection in any season, and that's been a key strength of ours. As it relates to the structural changes in North America, I think they're more pronounced here in America than they are in other markets where we work, and that's just an area where the company will have to continue to be vigilant in terms of its credit extension and how we build product for our solid customers that will survive.

Okay. And then if I could, just as it relates to the demand creation, it sounds like - obviously, a big component of the Project CONNECT and how you think about it. And I know we've heard sort of about this in years' past in terms of potentially more shifting right of the dollars from traditional to more digital. I just want to - is there any way to quantify and potentially the increase expected around demand creation and how that build should play out in the coming quarters and/or years?

Well, certainly. Well, just as a general comment, we're not spending enough. And you could argue that we're not spending what we're spending as efficiently as we ultimately will based on the conclusion of Project CONNECT. But the - I think it's an equation that will include variables from social media, sponsorships, traditional paid advertising and other methods of digitally connecting. But I think as we get further into Project CONNECT, we'll find that there are many ways for us to be evaluating the effectiveness and the efficiency of our ads and our marketing efforts. And we'll - we're further investing in those that have the higher return.

Our next question comes from the line of Rafe Jadrosich with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

I just wanted to ask you about the - follow up with you about the North America wholesale environment. Obviously, the first half year is impacted by some of the bankruptcies. Can you talk about how you just think about that longer term? Where are we in the retail shakeout. And then longer term, should we kind of expect that to be a flattish channel, offset by DofC?

Certainly. Well, first of all, I think the company does an excellent job of extending credits. So our losses to bankruptcy have been among the lowest of any of the major vendors to these retailers that have failed. So I mean, that's an area that gives me a great deal of confidence. As the weaker players exit the market, there'll be more opportunity for the stronger, better operators to continue to take market share. And frankly, in many of our wholesale partners, we aren't maximizing our position there. So that's - the Project CONNECT, as I said, is an equation to help us to improve the desirability of our products through better assortment planning and demand creation to make sure the consumers know what we have to offer and how superior it is and then working in connection with our wholesale partners and the ones that have survived to be providing more interesting ways to connect consumers emotionally to the company's products. So I mean, I think we've got a good opportunity to grow the business with the remainders and ultimately be much more successful than we've been today.

And, Rafe, just to jump in here, this is Jim speaking, when we look at the outlook that we've provided for the full year, with our U.S. wholesale business being down on mid-single-digit number, when you take out the impact of the bankruptcies and the liquidations, that's a low single-digit decline in the business that accounts for basically all of the decline that we saw through the first half of the year and right around 50% of the decline anticipated in the back half.

So excluding the bankruptcies, it's down low singles?

Low singles on the full year - yes, go ahead.

No, no. Finish your thought.

I was just going to say low single - yes, about low single digit, sorry.

Got it. And then it might be too early to answer this, but just on Project CONNECT, do you expect net cost savings from the initiatives? Or will all the savings be reinvested in demand creation or some of the other initiatives that you mentioned?

Well, I think the ultimate goal of CONNECT is to help improve our operating margin as well as to grow the business and invest more heavily in demand creation. So there'll be great things for investors to come from this project.

And, Rafe, as much as there's a cost component to it, I'd also indicate commercial opportunity in terms of other ways in which we can improve either the top line or gross margin as well. So certainly, we want to be more efficient in our spend and find opportunities to reallocate. But there's a lot of other dollars to be added when we think about top line opportunity in product cost side of the equation.

Our next question comes from the line of Laurent Vasilescu with Macquarie.

Forgive me if I missed this, but did you quantify the dollar amount of U.S. wholesale shifted from 3Q '17 into 4Q '17?

Yes, this is Jim speaking. So our third quarter U.S. wholesale business, we've got that projected down a low double-digit CAGR that shift out of the third quarter into the fourth, about $20 million, that you'll see there. And then we'd anticipate with that shift, our fourth quarter being up in the U.S. wholesale business at mid-single-digit level.

Okay, very helpful. And then I want to follow up on e-commerce revenues. Can you possibly parse out how e-commerce revenues did for this quarter in terms of percentage rate? And then separately, last year's e-commerce number, I think it was about $220 million. Should we anticipate a mid-to high teen growth rate for '17 overall?

Yes, you know what, as I said, we consider ourselves to be a wholesale supplier, so we don't provide those typical retail numbers. But we're pleased with our whole - with our e-comm business. And again, we consider that to be a significant component of our demand creation because we have, call it, average conversion rates. But that means many, many millions of customers go away with a great marketing message and hopefully buy our products, either on another platform, which is operated by one of our customers, or another retail store that our customers have our product.

Okay. And lastly, I want to follow up on FX. The euro keeps moving in the right direction. Can you help us think through how much every $0.05 move with the euro flows through the P&L?

Yes. We've looked at, we've continued to update the movements in the currency to the weakening of the dollar in our forecast. To be honest with you, with our European business, the European direct business, it's essentially a breakeven business. And so as much as you're in as much movement as you see in the currency as you translate those earnings, it's really not having that potential of an impact on our outlook. And so that's part of the reason why when you look at us maintaining our outlook, despite the weakening of the dollar over the course of the last 90 days, there's really not much of a - there's really not a change in the outlook that we're providing today.

Our next question comes from the line of John Kernan with Cowen and Company.

So as you look at Project CONNECT, how are you looking at the margin structure of the international business? There's obviously a big difference in your financial statements and the operating margin between international and North America. So I'm just wondering, how can you close the gap in profitability?

Well, the - as you remember, a portion of our business internationally is done through subsidiaries, and a portion is done through international distributors. The cost associated with our international distributors is low, and the gross margin is low. So I think on a blended average, we've probably got opportunities through Project CONNECT to get ourselves greater gross margin in both of those businesses through specific efforts around a SKU efficiency globally as well as improvements in our design to value projects.

Another thing we've obviously noticed is your cash balance is up over 50% since 2015. I'm just wondering, within Project CONNECT, would you - are you looking at ways to return cash - different ways to return cash to shareholders? Are you comfortable with the amount of cash you're carrying on the balance sheet right now?

Well, remember, much of our cash is held in offshore accounts. So it's not accessible generally to the business without a significant tax burden. But yes, Project CONNECT will help us to hopefully generate additional cash. And frankly, we have all the leverage available to us and have used them all to distribute cash, including share buyback, dividends. We've also used special dividends in the past, and we've acquired businesses. So we're mindful that our obligation is to have solid returns for all of our assets, including our cash. But as I said, we've got all the leverage available to us.

Our next question comes from the line of Chris Svezia with Wedbush.

I guess, first, Tom or Tim, when you think about Project CONNECT and the POS systems or the retail systems you have to put in place, can you give us any idea of how much of this is actual operating costs that could come on into the business to get these up and running? And how much is actually CapEx, potentially? Is it a 50-50 split? I'm assuming it's got to be systems, IT equipment, things like that. Just any color about those 2 dynamics would be helpful.

Yes. So as it relates to the retail platform initiative, yes, elements of that project will be CapEx and elements will be SG&A. I mean, I don't have the numbers in front of me for the SAP implementation, but I think, roughly speaking, it's been 50-50 in terms of CapEx and OpEx. And I would expect their global retail platform to be generally in the same similar ratio, but we're really early stage in the planning phase. So we'll provide more colors as those plans come together. And then did you also have a question on Project CONNECT in the same regard? Or...

Yes, yes, that will be helpful, Tom, if you have any thoughts about that as well.

So yes, maybe just to talk a little bit about that. There wouldn't - I can't foresee any real capital CapEx per se relative to internal costs being incurred for that project. But I would say, as Jim mentioned, there are commercial elements that impact top line cost of goods and gross margin, and then there's indirect SG&A that would impact the SG&A line. So we would expect really all elements of the P&L to be impacted by Project CONNECT over time.

Okay. Okay. And then what percentage of the business now is demand creation? I want to say something in the 5%, so I might be wrong. And then final thoughts, just on the inventory, down 14%, how should we think about that for the balance of the year? It will be helpful.

Yes, I can touch on each of those. So for a marketing spend perspective, we anticipate our marketing spend as a percentage of revenue to be in line with where we were in 2016 at about 5% of sales, so calibrated to that. And then from an inventory standpoint between now and the end of the year, we'd anticipate, at the end of the third quarter, we'll continue to trend down. But as we look out to the balance of the year, it's all - it's dependent upon, obviously, receipts as we get out to our spring '18 season but we'd anticipate the inventory moderating a bit more in line with our full year sales growth rate of about 3%.

Our next question comes from the line of Michael Kawamoto with D.A. Davidson.

I'm on for Andrew. Just in relation to Project CONNECT, where do you full price brick-and-mortar stores spend your DTC strategy going forward?

Yes, certainly. Well, here in the U.S., we have a few full price, what we call, branded stores, and I would suggest that we have to get our legs underneath us in those stores before we would make significantly more investments. We believe there are opportunities for us in many parts of the United States for branded stores to help us elevate the brand as it relates to our other successful businesses with wholesalers and with others. And as it relates to globally, we have many, many full price stores globally, and those tend to be very successful, operated in general by our wholesale distributor - our independent distributors internationally, and those have been very successful. So on a blended basis, we have a successful full price store fleet, but before we make further investments in North America and in Europe, we want to have a better format and we're working on that.

Ladies and gentlemen, that is all the time we have for questions today. I'd like to turn the floor back to management for closing comments.

Well, thank you very much for listening in today, and we look forward to having more information about the future of the business and Project CONNECT next time we connect.

Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.