Greetings, and welcome to the Columbia Sportswear Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2015 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to your host, Ron Parham, Senior Director of IR and Corporate Communications. Thank you, Mr. Parham. You may begin.

Thanks, Bob. Good afternoon, and thanks for joining us today to discuss Columbia Sportswear company's fourth-quarter and full-year 2015 financial results, and our 2016 financial outlook that we announced earlier this afternoon. In addition to our earnings release, we furnished an 8-K containing a detailed CFO commentary, analyzing our results and explaining the assumptions behind our 2016 outlook. The CFO commentary is available on our Investor Relations website. With me today on the call are Chairman of the Board, Gert Boyle; Chief Executive Officer, Tim Boyle; President and Chief Operating Officer, Bryan Timm; Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Tom Cusick; and Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Secretary, Peter Bragdon. I'll ask Gert to cover the Safe Harbor language.

Good afternoon. This conference call will contain forward-looking statements regarding Columbia's business opportunities and anticipated results of operations. Please bear in mind that forward-looking information is subject to many risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from what is projected. Many of these risks and uncertainties are described in Columbia's annual report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2014, and subsequent filings with the SEC. Forward-looking statements in this conference call are based on our current expectations and beliefs. And we do not undertake any duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this conference call, to conform the forward-looking statements to actual results or to change in our expectations.

Thanks, Gert. And then before I turn the call over to Tim, I'd also like to point out that during the call, we will reference constant currency net sales growth, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. And we provide a reconciliation of constant currency net sales to net sales as reported under U.S. GAAP, and an explanation of management's rationale for including this non-GAAP measure, in the supplemental financial tables that accompany our earnings release, a copy of which is also available on our website, at investor.columbia.com. Now, I'll turn the call over to Tim.

Thanks, Ron. Welcome everyone, and thanks for joining us this afternoon. 2015 was another outstanding year for Columbia Sportswear Company. One that finished even better than our expectations when we last spoke in October, despite unseasonably warm weather, macroeconomic challenges, and currency headwinds in many of our key markets. We have said consistently that our objectives are to increase sales, expand gross margins, increase demand creation investments, and expand operating margin. That's exactly what we did in 2014, and again in 2015. And that's what our outlook for 2016 anticipates doing for a third consecutive year. Our progress in 2015 is a reflection of the brand portfolio we have built, and the brand enhancing investments that we're making. For the Columbia brand, the most significant and visible investment during 2015 was the October global launch of the Tested Tough brand campaign. Tested Tough, featuring Gert reprising her role as the original tough mother, is our largest, most integrated global campaign in the company history. It taps into the heritage, history and character of the Columbia brand, to differentiate and broaden the brand's appeal on a global scale. Not many CEOs are able to say that their 92-year-old mother has made a successful marketing comeback. One of the most unique and successful aspects of the Tested Tough campaign has been the work of our Directors of Toughness, two employees that we hired in October to test our gear in extreme environments. From more than 4,000 applicants, we selected Lauren Steele and Zach Doleac, and have sent them on journeys to the Arctic Circle in Alaska, the rainforests of Costa Rica, the isolation of Southern Chile, the northern plains of Alberta, Canada, and most recently, the wild jungle of the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah. Our Directors of Toughness have…

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Bob Drbul with Nomura. Please proceed with your question.

Gert, congratulations on your successful marketing comeback.

You can't keep a good woman down, you know that, don't you?

I do know that. Nice work. I have a series of questions, Tim, if I could sort of do it in two approaches, please. The first one, on the fourth quarter, can you guys comment a little bit more about, I think you alluded to a 40% increase in independent distributor sales in the fourth quarter, from the first quarter. Can you talk about what's happening there? The second one is, can you comment a little bit on how -- the Sorel business did very well, and just how that has trended through a tougher warm season? And how it is in the first quarter, and on the current results? The third question is, in the inventory, can you break down -- how much of the increase is from the spring 2016 and how much of it is current fall 2015 product?

Let me grab the Sorel question first, and then Tom, I think, is going to handle the other two. We found, obviously, over time, that as our business with Sorel gets closer to the actual consumer, to the woman that we're really focusing on, it becomes less and less a weather-driven issue. We would have had, obviously, better results had we had better weather. But frankly, the team at Sorel has done a terrific job of managing the business, so that the products available are, in addition to the protective story that we have for winter, are good for fall and for warmer climates. And then just the additional expansion of the brand's availability and noteworthiness, through the marketing efforts that we talked about during my comments, have just helped it immensely.

Yes, Bob, on the distributor question, the shift is really not that overly significant. I think it's a mid to high single digit millions of dollars number of shift. So the 30% to 40% increase is off a relatively small base. That's not overly significant. And then on the inventory, the inventory aging is in a lot better shape this year than it was a year ago. I think 57% to 58% of the inventory makeup is spring 2016, and that's on hand and/or on the water. So we feel relatively comfortable with our inventory position, exiting the year.

Okay. And then just a couple of questions on the 2016 outlook, if I could. The first one is, when you think about the weather and the season that we've had and are having currently, can you talk about the visibility in orders? With the -- you gave some clarity on first half sales expectations versus second. So can you talk a little bit about your visibility in the order book for the Columbia brand and the Sorel business? And I guess the second question on that I have is, on the -- you mentioned price increases in non-U.S. jurisdictions. Can you talk a little bit about the magnitude of that, and how that's being received? And then on the expectation for DTC, you have low double digits. Is that predominately square footage expectations or can you give us a little bit more clarity on that, as well?

Certainly. In terms of visibility, the company writes an order book in advance, and that gives us a significant amount of confidence, in terms of projecting our revenues for the future. So we have a strong order book, and we are excited about the potential there. Obviously, our wholesale customers would be buying more, if the weather had been better. But we're confident in our ability to foresee the future, based on our order book. And that would include both for the Columbia and the Sorel brands. Regarding price increases outside the U.S., if you remember, a large percentage of our business outside the U.S. is dollar-denominated through our independent distributors. So those guys take the risk on the dollar change. And I think if the U.S. dollar were less strong, we would probably, again, have a bigger business in those markets. The price increases that we have taken in our direct markets have been well received, especially in Europe direct, where we talked about our expectations for significant growth in the fall, and the balance of the year, for 2016. Those are all with price increases attached. And then as it relates to the retail business, as we said before, we're not a retailer. We're focusing on our wholesale business. So we don't typically release the typical retail metrics that some might follow, but I can tell you that we're going to be opening a modest number of stores next year. And that it's not really -- it's an improvement in our business, not necessarily an improvement in square footage, or increasing square footage.

Great. Thank you very much.

Our next question comes from the line of Camilo Lyon with Canaccord Genuity. Please proceed with your question.

I was hoping you could comment a little bit on the overall channel inventory. I think -- I'm going to guess that there's probably a difference in how the quarter ended up, relative to where we are today, a month and a half into Q1, but having been significantly colder, at least, in the colder weather markets. Any sort of light you could shed on what the channel inventory is in your colder weather product would be helpful?

Certainly. I just want to make sure that you reminded that we have businesses globally. So I can go through the globe, and obviously, top of mind is North America, where we had a warm Q4. And then Q1, the weather impact has helped retailers liquidate that merchandise that they have on hand. Again, they weren't as profitable, that inventory, but it is certainly a cleaner channel today than it was at year end. In Europe, we also had relatively cold -- excuse me, relatively warm temperatures, and not great snow down in the -- they had good snow in the mountains, but not necessarily down in the cities. And we still had good growth there expected, based on the fact that we're taking share from some existing competitors. We did not have great weather in most of Asia. We had good weather in most of Russia. So I think, as it relates to the channel, again, we would have had a more robust business 2016 with more cold weather, but we're still very comfortable with the projections we've given you today, based on what we see in the channels.

Thanks for that, Tim. And maybe you could discuss a little bit about the differences in performance within the channels in the quarter, North American channels? So sporting goods versus department stores was there -- you talked, in your prepared remarks, about a shifting consumer landscape, and where they shop. Where did you see the strength? And where were the channels that were a little bit less strong than what you had anticipated?

Most of our larger retailers have a certain component of their business electronically, through e-comm. And so we don't know from them, generally, the quantity of merchandize that they sell of ours through e-comm, versus the quantity that they sell in their brick-and-mortar stores. But all of our retailers would not be immune to the impact of traffic on the Q4. And the fact that the bulk of the sales growth, I think, across the retail landscape has been in e-comm. So I would expect that that would be about the same, in our customers.

But no difference between sporting goods or department stores, just from the pricing tiered structure of the channel?

Not notably, no. I think our customers generally performed about the same, in terms of the liquidation. We monitor a high percentage of our customers' sales throughout the year, so we didn't see much difference between the various channels, other than the one I mentioned.

Okay. And just a couple of final ones. Is there -- with the colder weather having finally arrived here in North America, is there an opportunity for some of the fall 2016 orders to come in here towards the tail end of the winter or are you pretty much buttoned up for your fall order production schedule? And then just finally, if you could talk about Sorel and any planned SKU and distribution increases that you're looking to, to 2016, that would be helpful, as well.

Certainly. For the company, we basically have order deadlines from our customers to help us gauge what production to buy, and we match our orders and our production fairly closely, although the company does pick up, from time to time, a small speculative position. So as we've said in the past, if it's a cold weather winter in 2016, in Q4 of next year, there will be not much inventory around, and the primary delta will be in the margin at our retailers, and that we get for a more scarce product. So my expectation is that we're going to be pretty solid on our order book. We'll take a small position speculatively but basically, all the expectations have been baked into the guidance that we've given you today. As it relates to Sorel, virtually no change in the distribution, in other words, the customer base. It's just an increased amount of business with our existing customer base. Obviously, the success of the fall product, which is relatively new for Sorel, is helping that business get bigger. But it's not really a new distribution play.

Any sense as to the SKU count increase? Does fall drop into that number?

Yes, there's been some SKU count increase, but certainly not significant. As you know, we added apparel, and apparel will be slightly more broadly distributed in 2016, but again, almost exclusively to existing Sorel customers.

Great. Thanks a lot, and all the best to you.

Our next question comes from the line of Jay Sole with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.

The growth projected for next year in your guidance for prAna, the mid-20%, is pretty impressive, considering it seems like there's a lot of competitors entering that women's athletic apparel space. How are you able to find the niche you need to grow this business? Can you just, Tim, give us a little bit more specifics on where you're growing and how you're doing? And how do you plan to protect that, going forward?

As we talked at length internally, no consumer needs another brand to buy. There's plenty of brands around, and plenty of merchandise to buy. It's all about how we differentiate our products from others. And I can say specifically that folks at prAna are very good at providing products, which are keenly differentiated from competitors. And that's really, at the end of the day, how they've been able to be successful in not only their own stores, competing with other companies that sell products, but also through wholesale customers. I'm probably least prepared to talk about how women's apparel and yoga is different. But apparently, our consumers are telling us that they like the merchandize, and so we think the proof is in the pudding there, in terms of how the stuff is selling.

Okay. And then maybe just shifting gears, can you give us a little bit of an update on SAP? Just where we are in the expense cycle and the implementation cycle and some of the benefits you've seen through the past quarter?

This is Tom. So we've got roughly 70% of our revenue base, virtually the lion's share of our supply chain operations, on the platform. So that would be all of our North American business, excluding prAna, as well as our international distributors, and we're currently working on Japan. So we're in the middle to late innings. We've got, basically, Asia and Europe to go. And as it relates to the benefits we are seeing, if you look back to, say, the end of 2012 through 2015, and you look at the improvements we've made in our gross margins, particularly those that are on the platform. And the inventory turns took a tick backwards this year, given some of the weather patterns, but through last year, the cash flow benefits, they've been very meaningful. We've not quantified those publicly. But I can say, it's been very impactful financially, to the businesses that are on the platform.

Okay. Maybe one last one, can you talk about how FX is impacting the numbers? Because it seems like, this year, going into 2016, it will be a bigger impact. I think you said $0.28 versus $0.10 last year. But it seems like the rates have gotten -- the comparisons eased in 2016? Can you talk about the mechanics of how FX is impacting the numbers this year, both on gross margin and SG&A?

As it relates to gross margin, we had about a 50 basis point negative effect in 2015, based on currency rates, and frankly, we got a little bit ahead of some of the international currency weakening, coming into 2015. So 2015 was better than it otherwise would have been. Now, 2016, we're going to have about a 100 basis point impact on gross margin. So most of that $0.28 is coming through the gross margin. There's a little bit in translation and transaction, but the lion's share is in the gross margin and the hedge rates, the cost of inventory.

Okay. Got it. Thank you so much.

Our next question comes from the line of Jonathan Komp with Robert W. Baird. Please proceed with your question.

Maybe the first question I just have really relates to the outlook for 2016. I think it's called out that the top line growth in the first half would be slower than in the second half. And I just want to understand what the moving pieces are there?

I think the first half is definitely a tougher comparison. We grew about 15% in the first half of last year, of 2015, and about 8% in the second half. So we have some benefit from the prAna acquisition in the first half of 2015. A lot of it is a tough comp, and then we get into the fact that, from a profitability standpoint, you've got a much higher impact of currency on the first and third quarter gross margins. So the first half profitability will be down, say $10 million to $20 million in the first half, with the lion's share of that actually concentrated in the first quarter.

Okay, got it. And just as a follow-up, I know late last year, it sounded like the spring order book for 2016 was lining up to be pretty robust. Has there been any changes there, in terms of the expectations or is it just some of the factors you mentioned, in terms of the comparison?

No, I think it's just the comparison. We haven't had any material changes in our order book.

I would say the one area that we're probably most challenged, from an order book standpoint, would be in our distributor businesses, in those emerging markets, from Russia to Latin America. Those businesses, as we mentioned in my commentary and Tim's, those businesses, we're not planning for growth in 2016.

Great. And then last one for me. At this time last year, I think you pointed to about 10 basis points of operating margin expansion, and obviously over-delivered versus that target pretty significantly. I'm just wondering, as you look to 2016, what the major puts and takes are, outside of what weather looks like next year, in terms of the operating margin as you see it today?

So I would say the puts and takes, from my perspective, would be just the macroeconomic environment today, I would say, is certainly or arguably more volatile. We've seen a lot more volatility in the last few months, with regard to foreign currency valuations, relative to the U.S. dollar, both ways, in fact, up and down. I think the performance of our retail business, retail will be roughly 37% of our total business this year. So that's an increasingly important part of the business and then ultimately, how weather plays out in the fourth quarter. So I think all those variables are at play, and we try to put together a plan that takes those into consideration. We plan for a normal winter weather pattern, and try to play the outlook really down the middle.

Okay, that's helpful. Thanks, guys.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Burns with D.A. Davidson. Please proceed with your question.

Congratulations on an excellent 2015. Just a couple of markets I was hoping you could review in more detail. Maybe a state of the union, on where we are, in terms of South Korea and Russia, in terms of stabilizing and ultimately returning to growth in those. As well as China, which has the potential to be a dead double-digit grower, but still clearly, there's some challenges there. Thanks.

Certainly. I think, as it relates to South Korea, that's been really an industry implosion, I guess I would describe it, in the outdoor business. Other competitors of ours have noted that the business there has changed significantly. In fact, many of our competitors are actually leaving the market. We made a change in our leadership there, and I believe we got the opportunity, frankly, to get back to growth there, sometime soon. So the industry is not necessarily a healthy place right now, but I think those things that we can control in South Korea, we've worked diligently to do that. And we have an opportunity, frankly, which many competitors don't, and that's moving inventory globally, to be able to help liquidate. And we did some of that this year, taking merchandise from South Korea to other locales around the world, to help us liquidate. Russia is really a function of the ruble's strength and oil. Those are the key parts of the impact in that market. We're very fortunate that our distributor in Russia is very strong. We have a very long-term relation with them. And frankly, this is not the first time we've been in an economic crisis situation with them. In fact, it may even be the third or fourth, based on the volatility of that market. So we have a very strong partner, and we're very confident that we've got the right people managing the business for the company in Russia. China, frankly, there's enormous opportunity for us there. They're very pleased with our partner there, a joint venture partner with Swire Resources. And we think the addition of a strong go to market manager, like Jason Zhu, with significant experience in that market, is going to help us get back to growth. You can see, as we talked about the strength in the company's business in 11/11, in that market, just how strong the brand is there. We have a leading position in the marketplace and outdoor apparel. And frankly, there's big opportunity for us there, and we will begin to take advantage of that.

Thanks. And a second question, in terms of non-Sorel branded footwear, I know it's not exact. But when you back out the Sorel revenue from your footwear revenue, it looks like the Columbia footwear continues to grow very nicely, healthy double digits. I just wanted to get your thoughts on 2016, in terms of the key area of growth for footwear, by product or region. Thank you.

Certainly. Probably one of the most significant areas of growth for the company in the Columbia footwear -- and by the way, I should point out that since 1998, since we went public, I've been saying that that should be our largest product category. We're not there yet, but at least we're moving towards that. But the biggest area of growth for us has been in Europe, for the Columbia footwear brand. And it's actually quite gratifying, because our biggest market there is France, and we have a very strong competitor in Salomon. And it's great to be taking slots, from time to time, from that great company. But really, the opportunity for us, we believe, is in the Columbia footwear and the trail category, both in regular hiking merchandise, as well as trail running. So I think that's an enormous opportunity for us, and will continue to grow, and we're putting more emphasis towards that category.

Thanks, and good luck.

Our next question comes from the line of Susan Anderson with FBR. Please proceed with your question.

Congrats on a great quarter. So I was wondering if you could talk about the EBIT margin opportunity. You significantly beat your estimates this year again. So maybe if you could give us an update on your thoughts on where this could go? How much is left within the system, and just with having better, more innovative product and higher margin product? And maybe then also touch on the opportunity with pricing?

We've been talking at length about the four important strategy outcomes that we need to become better. As you know, we've been lagging behind our peers, in terms of our profitability. And to get to average, we need to grow our top line, we need to grow our gross margin, we need to grow our marketing spend, and we need to grow our operating margin, or EBITDA. And it's a daunting task, but I think, led by the innovation group and the innovative products, specifically in the Columbia brand, and the key fashion brands that have been really dominating for us, which would be Sorel and, of course, the combination, in prAna, of innovation and fashion there, have been great. I think we can get to beyond average. And that's my personal goal, is to get ourselves in the areas about where we were in the early 2000's which is very significant profitability.

We ended the year at about 13.2% EBITDA margin. The peer group is roughly 14%, all the numbers aren't out for 2015. So through the expanded growth margin, and getting back to double-digit growth, and our ability to leverage the SG&A line, and more of the business being on the SAP platform, we think there's a fair amount of runway to continue to expand the operating and the EBITDA margins. And we've done this over the last couple of years, in the face of almost 200 basis points of currency headwinds, so we're chipping away at it.

Yes, it's been a great performance. And then a follow-up on prAna. So the sales there have been obviously very strong. Maybe if you could give a little bit more color on what are the areas that are driving this? Obviously, a small store base. So is it just increasing space within existing wholesale customer, or is it new doors? And then maybe if you could touch on, internationally, the role out there or how should we think about this becoming much more significant at some point?

Right. They really have not expanded at prAna. We have not expanded our distribution footprint. This has been a growth in our existing customer base. Again, I'm probably the least competent person to talk about fashion available for women, but it's been resonating with women. And the team at prAna has a singular focus on getting her the right merchandise that she needs for her fashion apparel needs in the outdoors. The door growth has not been significant. And frankly, the international expansion that we thought we had earlier has been more challenging than we thought, but there's still significant opportunity internationally. We haven't grown there as fast as we had thought we would, primarily due to the currency issues. But I think that that opportunity is quite significant, based on the strength of our distributed base for the Columbia and Sorel brands globally. I would say that the e-comm growth for prAna in the US has been outstanding. And the team there really understands how to convert loyal prAna customers.

Okay. And then one last question on the inventory front. So it sounds like there's a little bit left over from Sorel. Is their expectation that some of this will be sold through the outlets next fall or do you think you can clear through the rest of it in the first quarter?

I would say, when we look at the fall 2015 excess, there's a good -- a pretty healthy percentage of the excess that's actually in line, fall 2016, that will carry over into the line -- the wholesale line for 2016. And then the residual excess, the lion's share of that will be cleared through our outlets in the second half of the year. Some of that's happening in the first quarter, but the majority of it will be second half of the year.

Got it. Good luck next quarter, guys.

Our next question comes from the line of Christian Buss with Credit Suisse. Please proceed your question.

Hi, this is Pallavi on for Christian. Could you please speak a little bit about the rollout of the OutDry Extreme rainwear platform? And what the cadence of that roll-out will be? And then what response you're seeing from retailers? Thanks.

Certainly. For those of you on the call that aren't familiar with OutDry Extreme, our innovation team really designed and developed a process to put the membrane, which is the functional part of a waterproof breathable garment, on the exterior. As opposed to the common place for that, is hidden underneath the textile exterior. So what happens when you put the membrane on the outside, you have to use less chemicals to make the water-repellant treatment work. So you have a cleaner face, facing the weather, which makes it more waterproof. And then when you have the textile on the inside, you actually have a higher breathability. So there's lots and lots of good things. The issue had been, previously, to how to make that durable, because the membranes often are fragile, so that the team in our innovations lab were able to solve that problem. And frankly, it's been a surprising and shocking, groundbreaking, many have called it game-changing process to make rainwear. And the sales volume was good for spring 2016. It's going to be expanded in fall, as we noted. We've been receiving awards for using that technology on down garments, which makes a truly waterproof down garment. And over the next several seasons, we will add other product categories in the outdoor extreme family. So it's been good. Because this is a very new kind of process, it's helped us to raise our gross margins on some of this product, and the reception has been frankly just exceptional. So all good.

All right. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jim Duffy with Stifel. Please proceed with your question.

Couple of areas. Clarification on the outlook, and then a question on the sports licensing opportunities. What are the -- as you look to the outlook, what are the expectations for retailers to pack away inventory? Is that a dynamic which you see having a meaningful effect on orders for the second half? And does the second half guidance assume a larger speculative inventory position and sales benefit, relative to your current orders, than you've had in previous years?

Yes, I think as it relates to pack-away, I think the bulk of our large customers don't really pack away merchandise. They liquidate it. Fortunately, in the month of January, and now in February, the weather has been conducive to liquidation, although not at great margins for most retailers. But I would expect that our retailers will be reasonably clean, the larger ones, at the end of, call it, middle February. But they were, frankly, spooked on their investments, going forward, in 2016. So we've been at this for a long time. I think this is maybe our 40 plus year in the outerwear business. And so this is not a new phenomenon for us. We're being cautious on our inventory builds. We don't want to get ourselves in a position where we have too much inventory, thinking that there's going to be some weather event that would make us all shout. When our inventory is gone, frankly, we have champagne corks all over the place. We love the weather, but we need to manage the business for a normal-weather winter. Did you have another question, Jim?

Just for clarification on that, Tim. Based on the orders that you have in hand, does the guidance presume more reorders that you would typically plan for? Or are you planning to build more of that spec inventory position, planning for a normal winter, based on your 40 some of years of experience with it or do the orders themselves support the guidance on that?

Jim, we plan the business based on normal weather patterns. So we don't have any outlandish assumptions built into the plan. Like I had mentioned earlier, to an earlier question, we really try to play this down the middle. So we're not taking a real speculative bet on the orders -- what orders are going to be in the second half, compared to prior years or historical norms.

Fair enough. Thanks for that. And then with respect to the sports licensing opportunity, clearly, Man U is a unique opportunity. Do you see this as the first of many such or is this a one-off? And then can you speak to the expected financial contribution of the sports licensing opportunities and the strategies for how this evolved?

Okay, yes, I would say the company doesn't historically go out looking for these licensing opportunities. The Manchester United folks came to us, and it was a unique opportunity for us, based on the strength of that brand in Asia and the strength of our business in Asia. So there aren't too many global franchises like that one. So it's yet to be seen whether or not there will be more, but we are approached from time to time. It has to be a unique set of circumstances. And frankly, the financial rewards pale by comparison to the marketing and brand rewards, when we couple up with a strong brand like the Cowboys or like Man U.

That makes a lot of sense. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Mitch Kummetz with B. Riley. Please proceed with your question.

Tim, you referenced the weather more than a few times on the call. And yet, you guys turned in a pretty solid quarter, and you've got pretty solid guidance, as well. So I'm just trying to understand, how did you offset the weather? Is it just that the business is less weather-dependent today than it used to be? Do you think you took a decent amount of market share in the quarter? Do you think that the marketing initiatives really kicked in, to drive business? What were some of the offsets to what was a pretty challenging weather situation in the quarter?

As you know, when we talk about the weather-sensitive nature of the business, as it relates to our offerings, which include, in the fall, a significant component of the PFG line. Which is, for all intents and purposes, a summer-weight product. So we've really been focused on making the business not dependent on blizzard conditions in North America, or frankly anywhere. We love it when it gets cold, because our inventory -- excuse me, our retailers get better, in terms of their inventory levels, and it makes for a better business. But we don't -- the business is not reliant on cold weather all the time, and that's been a key focus for us. We have, we believe, been taking market share, so that's been a positive. And consumers, for a number of different reasons, including the Tested Tough campaign, our connection with Man U, the other things that we talked about on the call, collegiate licensing, et cetera, have elevated the brand's value, and allowed for a larger revenue through our wholesale partners, to which we're pleased.

Okay, that's helpful. And Tom, maybe just a couple of housekeeping. On the FX impact in 2016, in your remarks, it's a $0.28 hit. Is that incremental to the $0.10? Or is it just another $0.18?

No, that would be incremental to 2015.

Got it. And then, you also were calling for double-digit DTC growth, and I know that Bob was asking about that earlier, and you talked about where you expect the growth to come from. But is there any way you can give us an idea as to what -- how big was your DTC business in 2015? Just so we have a better sense as to what double-digit, low double-digit growth means there? What percentage revenues was DTC for you guys, in 2015? Can you give us that?

I don't have that number, specifically, in front of me. But what I would say is, we are planning for DTC business to grow faster than brick-and-mortar.

Right. Just trying to understand. Well then maybe you can answer it this way.

E-comm can grow faster than brick-and-mortar and our DTC channel.

What's implied for wholesale? Is wholesale mid-single-digit growth, then, if DTC is low doubles?

Yes, it would be in that order of magnitude. That would be correct. That's going to vary by geography, by channel.

Okay, great. All right, thanks. Good luck.

Our next question comes from the line of Corinna Freedman with BB&T. Please proceed with your question.

Just a couple of questions on product. The collaboration that Mountain Hardwear did with Cole Haan, I'm just wondering if you can comment on that and any other plans going forward? And then for Sorel, if you could give us an update on the category expansion there? With outerwear being the most notable this past year, are there any other categories that you plan to get into, going forward? Thank you.

Certainly. The collaboration with Mountain Hardwear and Cole Haan was one, frankly, that worked terrifically. We are approached, from time to time, by other firms to do collaborations, and there's a few other smaller ones in the works. But this one with Mountain Hardwear is probably the most notable, and the one that had the most resonance, certainly, for that brand. It's been great for both companies. Obviously, Cole Haan is a much more urban brand, and helped us to extend the Mountain Hardwear technical features into an urban area, so that's been good. Again, as I said, we are approached, from time to time, by others, and we occasionally take advantage of those. But typically, for 2015, and again for 2016, the largest one will be this Cole Haan combination. As it relates to the Sorel outerwear expansion, it was successful last year. Probably not the best year to launch an outerwear line for -- in, certainly, North America and Europe. Although we've had good success in an expanded customer base for 2016, we're not expanding beyond customers who already carry Sorel footwear. But many of those customers, now, are taking advantage of the Sorel outerwear, to add to their product offering. As it relates to other product categories for Sorel, there's a small expansion of handbags, and that's been interesting. It's not going to be meaningful this year, but has been interesting for us to get involved there. We think there's an opportunity long-term, but that would be the only notable brand extension beyond outerwear.

Great, thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Rafe Jadrosich with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks for taking my questions. Can you give a little color on the momentum you're seeing in the Europe direct markets? And then, can you talk about the progress you're making on margins there?

At the end of the day, it's about the team, and the focus of the team on the Columbia brand. So we're thrilled with our Manager there, Franco Fogliato, who has a deep experience in the outdoor market, and frankly, in the sportswear market in Europe. His team has a number of very specific initiatives. Probably the primary one is, focus on a narrower collection of geographies, i.e. those large countries that can really move the needle for the company. We're also concentrating on those large customers inside those markets. So that's probably been the single biggest change for the company, is the level of focus in that market, and how Franco and his team have been putting themselves forward. And frankly, the ability to take market share in a market that, I think, in general, is not growing. So it's really been key for us there. We have big investments there, not only in people, but in distribution facilities, and then facilities for managing the business. And so once we get that bigger and more profitable, it'll make a big difference in the company's product -- performance and profitability.

Are the Europe direct markets EBIT positive yet?

Close, but not quite there in 2015. Obviously, currency has been the biggest inhibitor. We've seen excellent SG&A leverage in that market. But with currency rates, with the Euro weakening roughly 20% year over year, in 2015 versus 2014, that's been a major inhibitor to progress. If you separate that, we're approaching being EBITDA neutral there, exiting 2015.

And that then one more follow-up question. Just on the 2016 guidance, what's the store outlook -- store growth outlook?

In North America, we're planning to open nine stores. One of those would be in Canada, and that would include one Columbia branded store and one prAna branded store, and seven outlets. Europe, we're planning for four outlets. And then in Asia, which is a combination of owned franchise shop-in-shops and standalone stores, we're planning six stores in Japan. Korea will go backwards by roughly 11 stores net, and 4 stores in China. So a total of 24, excluding Korea additions in 2016, and that's on top of 29 in 2015.

Okay. And then as you look at the North America outlet market, do you have a sense of how many you could open, longer-term?

We've been focused on being very -- opening the stores where we think we need to open them, as it relates to liquidating inventory. So we are in a position where we want to make sure that we have a match between our inventory excesses and the store count. And many of our competitors have maybe twice as many stores as we do in the outlets, and that's not our focus.

Great. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Laurent Vasilescu with Macquarie. Please proceed with your question.

I wanted to follow up on the comments that the back half will be stronger than the first half. Is it fair to say that the first half should experience a 2% growth rate, year over year, while the back half balances the full-year guidance?

It's not -- the first half isn't quite -- it's not -- it's probably closer to double the 2%. It's probably closer to 4%, Laurent.

Okay, great. And then, I wanted to talk about the gross margin guide a little bit more. How much do you expect DTC to be a benefit to gross margin. Should it be 20 to 30 basis points for the full year?

So we're planning the full year up roughly 40 basis points. Currency will be 100 basis points negative. So the channel mix will be the biggest benefit for the year, and drive the lion's share of the expansion. But the favorable sourcing, and the price increases, are also contributing to that 40 basis point expansion.

Okay, so the first one, the primary one, to get to the guide, down 100 bips on the FX, to get to that 140, to get to the full year 40. So we should expect -- is it 100 basis point for DTC, and then the balance from the other input?

Yes, it's not entirely DTC. You've got DTC growing faster than the wholesale business. You've also got a smaller -- lower gross margin international distributor business that actually will be a smaller business in 2016 compared to 2015.

Okay, great. And then lastly, on marketing, it sounds like demand creation, it ended to be -- it was 5.2% for this year, and that's a similar rate to 2014. Are there any opportunities to increase the 2016 guide of 5.4%? And then ultimately, where do you want to shake out?

If the bulk of our revenues are in the back half of the year, so one of the levers we have, to make sure that we trim the business perfectly, is our marketing spend. And so it may go up, depending on how we see the balance of the year play out. We're committed to a major investment in our in-store appearance, so those things -- those investments will go forward. But there is an opportunity to both increase and decrease our marketing spend in the back half of the year.

Okay, thank you very much, and best of luck.

Our next question comes from the line of John Kernan with Cowen and Company. Please proceed with your question.

This is Krista Zuber on behalf of John Kernan. Most of our questions have been answered. Just a couple of quick things. One on The Sports Authority, could you please talk to your exposure to this retail partner and what is assumed in your 2016 guidance?

We've been doing business with The Sports Authority for many, many years, in its various iterations. We're comfortable that we've set our guidance that we've given you for 2016, based on our expected outcome of the various financial challenges that they have in front of them. Tom, maybe you could talk a little bit about our current exposure, and where we are, from a receivables standpoint.

Yes, from a receivables standpoint, we don't have any exposure today. The ultimate fate of the business may have some impact, based on our overall business, but I think that's all factored into the revenue outlook that we have today.

Okay, thanks. And just one more. Can you just walk us through the step-up in CapEx, to $70 million in 2016 versus 2015? What kind of capital projects is this including, over and above the SAP implementations that you already discussed? Thank you.

Yes, so at $70 million, we're pretty flat with 2015, so there's really no step-up. We're pretty equal. So I would say there's a little bit smaller investment in the direct to consumer build-out of brick-and-mortar stores, with the store count being slightly down. There's a bit of a step-up in capital, relative to digital commerce investment, and a small step-up related to the ERP. So -- and then less investment, overall, in 2016 versus 2015, and in certain corporate facility investments that we made in 2015.

Great. Thank you.

Our final question comes from Christopher Svezia with Susquehanna International Group. Please proceed with your question.

Hey guys, congratulations, and thanks for taking my question. I guess just a quick update, if I missed it, I apologize. The Mountain Hardwear, could you talk a little bit about what's going on there? Just any updates, those types of things, if you could?

Yes, we don't have any announcement today, as it relates to leadership at Mountain Hardwear. The team that's in place there is a combination of our Bryan Timm, our President, and Scott Kerslake, who's the President of prAna. They're working together to keep the focus there on the future, and I believe we're doing a good job. You can see, by the discussions we had on -- as it relates to the Cole Haan business, and the business that we're going to be doing with the standard Mountain Hardwear customers. We're pretty pleased with how it's going. But we do need a new leader there, and we have nothing to announce, though, today.

Okay. Fair enough. And then Tom, for you, just a follow-up, real quick, on the gross margin, for a moment. When I think about the cadence for the year, is it fair to think about, Q1 would probably see the most amount of pressure, maybe some true up some of the inventory, near term? Back half, you see more of the growth, in terms of the improvement, just based on the mix of the business, the DTC? Is that a fair way to think about it?

Yes, I think when you look at Q1 and Q3, the currency hit is relatively meaningful in each of those quarters. And I think you can assume, in the 85 basis points of contraction, year over year, in each of those quarters.

Okay, that's helpful. When you talk about the inventory, and having more in-line product, in terms of the residual, is that -- can you move that inventory to more favorable margins? And is that why there's not, maybe, as much of a hit as you get towards the tail end of the year, when you look to move that product?

Yes, so the in-line carryover would be -- for example, certain of the year-round replenishment styles that may have increased, year over year. That that would just carry forward, and we would sell that in both spring and fall. And those would be at basically full price.

Okay. Understood. Okay. Thank you very much, and all the best, you guys. Appreciate it.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back to management for closing comments.

Thank you all for listening in. We look forward to talking to you again in April, around Q1. So thank you.