Thanks Brenda, and good morning everyone. We certainly appreciate your time today and your interest in Columbus McKinnon. On the call with me today are Mark Morelli, our President and CEO; and Greg Rustowicz, our Chief Financial Officer. You should have a copy of the third quarter fiscal 2019 financial results, which were released earlier this morning. If not, you can access those as well as the slides that will accompany our conversation today at our Web Site cmworks.com. If you'll turn to Slide 2 in the deck, I will first review the Safe Harbor statement. As you are aware, we may make some forward-looking statements during the formal discussions as well as during the Q&A session. These statements apply to future events that are subject to risks and uncertainties, as well as other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from what is stated here today. These risks and uncertainties and other factors are provided in the earnings release as well as with other documents filed with Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents can be found on our Web Site or at sec.gov. During today's call, we will also discuss some non-GAAP financial measures. We believe these will be useful in evaluating our performance. You should not consider the presentation of this additional information in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. We have provided reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to comparable GAAP measures in the tables that accompany today's release and the slides for your information. So with that, please turn to Slide 3, and I will turn it over to Mark to begin. Mark?

Thanks, Deb, and good morning everyone. We delivered another quarter of solid results and remain optimistic about our future. We are demonstrating excellent execution of our blueprint for growth strategy as we're improving the earnings power of Columbus McKinnon. For the quarter, we had strong organic sales growth of 6% adjusting for the impact of FX as we gain share by improving availability and shortening our lead times [of course] [ph]. Helping the strong sales growth was the $3.5 million rail project we delivered in Saudi Arabia in the quarter as well. For the seventh consecutive quarter, gross margin expanded year-over-year. Gross margin was 33.8% expanding 90 basis points. On a GAAP basis, we had a diluted loss per share of $0.03 in the quarter that was driven by the non-cash charge associated with the remaining businesses held for sale. However, on an adjusted basis deluding earnings per share improved 39% to $0.61, further adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 130 basis points to 14.2% and stands at 15.1% year-to-date. Through our self-help strategy, we're deploying our operating system that includes our 80/20 process which is helping to drive significant bottom-line growth. In fact, we realize $5.5 million in savings in the quarter from our strategic initiatives. There is a long runway ahead of us with a lot of opportunities to further drive improvements. We continue to generate strong cash flow. We paid down $50 million of debt year-to-today. Our net leverage ratio has crossed an important milestone as is now below 2x net debt to EBITDA once again ahead of target. We will continue to prioritize our cash to reduce debt and improve our net leverage ratio. Another important metric for us is ROIC. With the strength of our financial performance adjusted ROIC was 10.5% an improvement of 190 basis points…

Thank you, Mark. Good morning everyone. On Slide 5, consolidated sales in the third quarter of $217.4 million were up approximately 4% from the prior year. Without the impact of FX, we saw organic sales growth of $12.7 million or 6.1%. This was slightly better than the top-end of the outlook provided last quarter of 4% to 5% sales growth excluding adjustments due to foreign currency translation. Sales volume was up $9.9 million or approximately 5% and pricing was higher than the previous year by $2.8 million or 130 basis points. Year-over-year pricing improved about 30 basis points from Q2 levels largely due to our 80/20 pricing initiatives. As you know, we typically raised prices for the majority of our businesses in fiscal Q4 and those plans are underway. While the markets are competitive, we have demonstrated our ability to capture pricing annually. Foreign currency translation remained a headwind in the quarter of approximately 2% and we expect the headwind to get worse in the fiscal fourth quarter. At today's foreign exchange rates, the headwind will be in the range of 3% to 4%. We saw solid growth in the U.S. and non-U.S. sales results were positive despite the impact of FX. For the quarter, U.S. sales were up $7.9 million or 7.3%. Sales outside of the U.S. were up 800,000 or 0.8%. Excluding the FX of foreign currency translation, we saw organic growth of 4.8% outside the U.S. It's important to know that our non-U.S. growth included a large rail project that Mark mentioned which was valued at approximately $3.5 million delivered to the Middle East. We feel good about the sales performance this quarter which is historically our weakest quarter from a seasonality perspective. We believe we are growing share in key markets and executing well. On Slide…

Thank you, Greg. Let me give you some color on our markets. Globally entertainment remains a sweet spot for us where our new black low chain offering has been well-received. There are more applications for automation in the entertainment segment that plays into our brand positioning and offerings. On the industrial automation front, our DDC series 2 new drive platform for the conversion of all DC power cranes and factories such as steel mills is a leading choice for these engineered order projects. The relative strength of the oil and gas industry is driving mid and downstream activity and is an area growth for us. Globally, our oil and gas, petrochemical and power generation customers look for the precise and safe lifting and positioning of heavy equipment. In many cases, these markets require explosion-proof hoist which is a core competency for us. In the construction industry where backlog is quite high, confidence remains strong and the distribution channels for construction equipment and contractors. And the utility market or power grid modifications are expected to drive demand for our new strap hoist launching in March. While lumpy, our rail project pipeline is stronger than it ever has been. Customers are upgrading infrastructure and electrifying rail systems as they expand new routes and replace diesel trains. I say of a soft spot might be automotive. However, we're still seeing model changes. The advance of new models of SUVs, trucks and electric vehicles is a plus for us. Geographically, demand in North America remains strong and Europe continues to grow. There were some slowness in the Middle East which was related to project timing. China is less than 2% of our total sales and doesn't have a significant impact on our results. As we've discussed, we're making excellent progress with our blueprint for…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from line of Greg Palm with Craig-Hallum.

Yes. Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. Hopefully you guys are surviving the cold and snow out there. Okay?

Yes. It's an impressive winter.

Yes. Anyways Mark thanks for the commentary on the end-market exposure. Was curious, if you saw any sort of change or inconsistency with the cadence of sales as the quarter trended on from a month-by-month basis and curious what you're hearing or seeing so far in January?

So the project related businesses saw a very strong demand and our order growth was I think well received. We're very encouraged by that. Folks are really progressing well on projects related to steel, aerospace. As I said in my remarks power generation is very good as well as utility markets. So I think the demand, we're seeing on the projects business is very, very good. We do have a seasonal downturn related to the industrial type products and this happens every year this time as the folks who follow the business know. And this is where people try to manage some of their budgets and their inventories for the end of the year and we saw that normal drop off. So I think there that was very normal and I think we probably are seeing an outsized growth in projects, which like I said we're very happy about.

Okay, great. As it relates to smart hoist, didn't hear a whole lot on the call, but you've had some more time to digest the initial launch. So just kind of curious what you're hearing from customers, what I mean is that make you more confident, less confident in the opportunity going forward?

That makes us more confident. In fact, we're just now expanding the range and we have a press release that's going out that that announces we're expanding an eight ton to three ton capacity. The feedback we're getting is very well received particularly because of the ease of use interface. And so this is very intuitive for folks on how you set parameters for the hoist and control it. And so I think it's a very good offering with a really solid user interface and we're getting some pretty positive feedback with that.

And in terms of an overall acceptance in it, I mean this is sort of a new product that new application for a lot of your customers. So how are they sort of thinking about overall adoption and sort of timeline in doing that?

Yes. This right now was positioned at the premium end of the market. So it's folks that want to enhance productivity. And I think they see the benefits of this. So I think that it's a very good offering and we feel good about it and as we continue to expand we'll be pushing more into the middle part of the market. We're also excited because as I mentioned this launch we're actually getting preorders for that which is not normal for us to get preorders ahead of the launch. And so I think that's also an encouraging sign.

That's great. Last one for me. You've done a really fantastic job at delivering here over the past year. I mean I'm just wondering have your capital allocation priorities changed at all. I've always thought that additional M&A would maybe be further down the road, but you've got an industrial environment that is softening a bit, I'm assuming valuations are coming in. So curious if that changes your thinking around acquisitions at all.

Well, as you know our phase 3 does involve M&A. However, we're really comfortable with our current posture of generating strong cash flow and continuing to pay down debt. We haven't fully engaged on phase three yet for doing the M&A work. So I don't suspect anything in the near-term and I think the capital allocation strategy we have is great particularly with the current outlooks for the market. So we'll continue to pay down debt below the 2% target that we've had. Greg you want to make any comment on that.

No. I think that's clearly the focus we -- one of the hallmarks of the company is our ability to generate cash and at least for the immediate time we will continue to delever the balance sheet. We do expect to exceed our target of $60 million of debt repayment for the year. We've already paid down 50 and we expect at least for the first couple of quarters next year. And so we're more fully into our phase 3, we'll continue to delever the balance sheet.

I guess if I could just sneak in one more quick one. It looks like free cash flow it might have been I don't know, if it was an all time record in the quarter, was a record for as far as I go back in my model, but have you changed the expectations or estimates for free cash flow this year.

Yes. I would say you're right it's fantastic performance on the free cash flow generation really the hallmark of our company. Typically, the fourth quarter is a really strong free cash flow quarter for us. And the other thing I would point out is, we have lowered our CapEx guidance for the year from probably 15 to 10 to 12 so obviously that will you know increase the operating free cash flow that we generate. And if our expectation is that what the new EBITDA margin target of 19% in fiscal 2022 that we would expect more cash flow generation going forward. For example at least in the $70 million to $75 million range next year probably $60 million to $65 million this year $70 million to $75 million next year.

Awesome. All right. I will see the floor. Thanks so much.

Our next question is from the line of Matt Koranda with ROTH Capital.

Hey guys. Good morning. I just want to start out with a clarification on the Q4 guide. So if I net the FX headwind against the organic guide come up with something about 1% overall growth combined. And then, we need to take out the additional headwind from the divestiture of tire shredder. And then another $1.5 million related to the crane equipment service business. So all together I think it's something like $211 million in total for Q4. That's sort of roughly directionally correct?

Yes. Matt it's Greg. Yes, you're thinking about it absolutely right. It's going to be in the neighborhood of $210 million to $212 million is our best estimate at this point.

Okay. Got it. And then, I mean the underlying organic growth is still pretty healthy. Just wondering if you could talk about the key drivers of that growth in the coming quarters. I mean that's typically the way I think about some of the macro data that comes out at least that's kind of a good leading indicator for Columbus McKinnon. If I look at PMI or capacity utilization figures globally, I mean there are puts and takes around the world. But I would say in general, the direction is either sort of in decline or maybe in the U.S., it's obviously still expanding but just at a lower rate. What are the key drivers just kind of sustain that low-single digit or mid-single digit growth rate in the out quarters. I mean I know you guys mentioned share take something that seemed critical to the quarter and your organic growth there and the outperformance. But wondered if you could talk a little bit more about share take, your expectations for unit growth, and then also pricing as we move into the fiscal 19? And then, I guess just follow-on for you guys.

Yes. We've got some really good initiatives that are really driven by the 80/20 process because it gives us the clarity of what we should focus on and we talk a lot about how we should leaders as part of that. But there's also parts of the business that you want to emphasize and we deploy more around that. I think an excellent example of that is the -- this project we talk about this wire rope hoist platform consolidation. It's not really a cost reduction for us it is really a repositioning of that product line and it helps us to expand into different market segments as well as well as added capacity. That's a great example of how we get better coverage with a better product and translates into share. The second point I'd like to make is, that some of these digital tools particularly in environment where supply chains are scratch, customers are actually stretch those resources that might be hard for them to get labor to be able to focus on these kind of things. If you can improve their productivity, you're going to be a lot easier to do business with and that actually leads to share gain because folks need to get their work done. And if you can get it done quicker and easier and by the way reduce lead times and lead times on quote and on product products then you're going to gain share. And I think that's exactly what we're beginning to see. I don't think we're going to see huge outside growth, if the markets go down. But I think we feel really good about a low growth environment which is very healthy for us and our strategy is perfect for that. So I think we see good markets as you said. If there is slow growth we're very happy to enjoy that slow growth with our strategy.

Okay. I heard a lot of commentary about share take in there which is positive. Anything else on sort of the pricing environment as we head into sort of a critical time period for you guys where you typically make price increases?

Yes. So we did see our year-over-year pricing increase from about 1% in the last couple of quarters to 1.3% and that would have been largely due to some of our 80/20 initiatives. But as we go forward you're right. We have a number of our businesses that raise price in this fiscal fourth quarter our U.S. business being the largest as a mid-March, early March effective date. So right now, we've gone out with what we expect and it's a competitive market and you don't unfortunately get all that you asked for but we'll continue to press on that. We've had good pricing leverage in Europe. Their prices went into effect in January and some of our other businesses have price increases effective in April. But all in all, I'd say we're cautiously optimistic, we'll continue to drive pricing forward and continue to offset some of the headwinds we see with tariffs and raw material costs.

That's helpful. And then, just last one since you mentioned 80/20, when did you attack it from the savings front. It looks like you're expecting an incremental roughly $3 million in savings in the fourth quarter for you guys from 80/20. So maybe you could talk a little bit about the buckets that that's coming from, I think Mark mentioned some of the simplification of the wire rope hoist product but any more color on that. And then, for fiscal '20, I think you guys have said that 80/20 saving should be higher than the $7 million that you're doing in '19. So anyway to mention that or directionally kind of provide a little commentary on where that should be, that would be helpful.

Yes. So your math is right Matt on that. We are targeting $7 million of savings. We've achieved 4.1 through December, so that implies about another 2.9 million, in Q4 it comes from a number of areas. I mean there's customer lists simplification, product lists simplification, we're also looking to service our bigger more important customers better and we call that our ratings fans program. And as a result of that -- a refocus on where we're making money and perhaps where we're not making money, we kind of redeploy resources and in some cases we've taken some indirect costs out of our facilities as we simplified our manufacturing processes because we've got less product that is being made. So it comes from all those areas and it's typically a gross margin story and it's there is some incremental pricing that comes from it that we saw in this past quarter about half of the company is into the 80/20 process now. The other half is going to get going with it this calendar year. So we're excited about that. One of our businesses is further long than others and that's where in the U.S. and our industrial products business and we're seeing a lot of good savings coming out of that business.

Okay. And then for fiscal '20, anything more directional in terms of the magnitude of the savings, I think you guys have said it's going to be more than fiscal '19. But that's what we'll leave it out at this time or any additional color.

Yes. No I think at this point I don't -- we're not ready to go out with it with another target. What we do know is that we got started in around the March timeframe this past year. It takes a bit to get trained to deal and analyze the data to make decisions to implement decisions. So we'll see the full year run rate next year and then for the businesses that haven't started the process yet. We've got to run the analytics so it's too premature to talk about what we might see their.

Okay. Fair enough guys. I'll just jump back in queue. Thanks.

Our next question is the front line of Joe Mondillo with Sidoti & Company.

Hi, guys. Good morning, Joe.

Good morning, Joe.

Just to follow up on that I guess, I'm looking at the other sort of 50% that you have to tackle on 80/20. What kind of timeframe? I mean you just mentioned that there's some analytics that you have to look at before starting to implement. But I think you initially started with North America you're sort of maybe easier low hanging fruit ways to implement. I'm just wondering sort of what kind of timeframe are you guys sort of thinking about overall level in terms of that other half of 80/20. Is this going to be -- within the next six to four or five months, things are going to be starting to implement or they're going to be a pause between what you've done so far and tackling the rest of things.

So this is a phase activity as you can imagine. You can't do it all at once. So I think we -- as you said we've tried to start with areas that we thought might be some low hanging fruit. But we are starting with our engineered product lines of products now and we'll be moving that forward next. And then, we obviously have our STAHL business that we're also keen up for later in this calendar year. So I think we do have a good pipeline of activity here. Folks are really engaged. People are really excited about it because they see the benefits of it. And so I think we are pretty methodically moving through the company here at a pretty good clip. So we'll update you more as we go through it. But we're going forward for sure.

And then, in terms of sort of productivity improvements and maybe potential efficiency improvements with square footage whether it's consolidation or anything else that you can sort of take advantage of. How do we think about what you've done with that and how much room of improvement you have with that?

Great question because it gives me an opportunity to highlight that we've really added a lot of new talent here in our operations team. And as you know Bert Brant came in Head of Operations, we're also bringing in new folks in terms of supply chain operations leads and also on our safety side. So the team is really getting their legs under them and really digging in and what's encouraging about is very database approach where we look at some of the facts on how we can tackle the problems in a logical order where we can get some of the biggest benefits. And it's encouraging because it really shows how much opportunity there is in this business and what a tremendous runway of opportunities we do have. So it's a fairly new team. We've done a lot of top grading to the organization and bringing in folks that really have seen some best class examples out there and I think for a company like Columbus McKinnon who's been on the lean journey it really ramps up our approach significantly. So we're very encouraged not only what we're beginning to see we can deliver, but what more we can deliver.

Okay. And then, just looking at the core business taking out sort of the restructuring benefits and everything that you're getting from that. In terms of your incremental margin could you sort of update us on how you think about sort of just normalized or incremental margin?

Yes. I think you're kind of referring to kind of the operating leverage, Joe?

Yes. That's right.

Yes. So, historically the company's always had really strong operating leverage and it's historically we would have said it's somewhere between 30% and 40%. I would say that we are expecting that to actually go higher because a lot of our strategy is of -- it is a self-help strategy where we're driving our performance driving cost out of our products and we would expect like this quarter for instance our operating leverage was 50 almost 60%. I think last quarter was over 100%. So as we're able to move our initiatives forward with the strategy, we should continue to see very strong operating leverage. So our strategy isn't depending on high growth. It's kind of a low growth assumption and but yet we still think we can drive roughly 400 basis points of EBITDA margin improvement.

Okay. And just to clarify when you say sort of should be higher. Are you accounting for sort of all the benefit that you're going to see from saving of less personnel here, less inventory in the process over here is more efficient. So there were big savings there. In terms of the incremental savings I'm trying to sort of take that out and just think about sort of the incremental margin X future cost savings relative to restructuring. Is that still sort of the case in terms of your comments relative to higher than the 30% to 40%?

Yes. I would say if I understand your question I would say that once we've made more progress with our strategy we would expect to have higher gross margins than the 35% level we have today and so probably on a normalized basis down the road., it's probably in the 40% to 45% leverage, so higher than the historical 30% to 40%.

Okay. Perfect. Thanks. And then, I also wanted to ask just in terms of your geographical exposure and what you're seeing. It seems like the common theme around the industrial sector is Asia and China sort of the worst and bled a little bit in the Europe and they're seeing a little bit of softness, but not as much as China; U.S. is holding up seemingly the best. Your non-U.S. sales, I guess if you exclude that rail shipment it looks like maybe down a little bit low-single digits and it was sort of flattish even including that rail shipment. Sort of how are you --could you talk about your non-U.S. exposure, what you're seeing, what you're hearing and what the trend is going into this quarter beyond that?

Yes. So I would concur to some your statements that the China area or Asia-Pacific, it might be a bit slower. It's not a large part of our business and I think net-net we have more opportunity to gain share. In Europe, we are seeing a slower growth environment, but our business continues to be strong. And as we said in our remarks and on the other Q&A here that we like a slow growth environment because it works really well for us. So we don't have any concerns there, reduce see continued demand going forward. And so we're very comfortable with where that business sets. But it certainly has slowed a bit compared to last year this time. In Europe excuse me in the U.S., things continue to be quite strong. And as I gave some color as well, we see some real strong project demand actually that demand is continuing into this year -- this calendar year. So our outlook from our visibility is good. And so we don't have reason to be really overly concerned. Obviously, you read a lot on the macro trends, but right now things look pretty good to us.

Perfect. Thanks for taking my question.

Thank you. Our next question comes from a line of Walter Liptak with Seaport Global.

Hi. Thanks. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question.

Hi, Walter.

I want to ask kind of a follow-on to the last one with the revenue growth for next quarter the 4% to 5%. Are you expecting that across the border there, U.S. stronger some international weaker, I guess a little bit of guidance on a regional basis please? Sure.

Well, we continue to see strength in the U.S. markets. And I would say the North American markets because Canada's also strong. And once, again, I think Europe is seeing some slow growth. I can give you a little more color on that compared to the Middle East. We did see the Middle East fall off a little bit, but we believe that's due to project timing issues. We have a lot of oil and gas projects into the Middle East and there's a normal ebb and flow of that based on project timing. So we're not really concerned about the Middle East, but we did see some weakness to the project timing. But Europe continues to grow and I think net-net we have more opportunities to expand in China and Asia just because we have such low share, but we we're not exposed there as other companies may be. So we're not really feeling as much impact from that.

Okay. Let me ask another one just on the EU and you commented that project based businesses where you've got the best visibility. Is the EU heavier project region of the world or is it more distribution book and ship business?

Yes. It's about equal mix, the STAHL has a great historical project business there, but we also have an industrial products base that's more historical with Columbus McKinnon so we definitely have -- we see both sides of that.

Okay. And if I could ask a pricing one, you do an annual price increase. And if he did, I wonder about, when it was implemented and how much can we expect at the top-line over the next 12 months from that?

Yes. So Walt, it's Greg. We typically raise prices annually and the timing is different depending on the region of the world. So in the U.S. that is underway right now. And that has been announced to our customers with a early March effective date in our industrial products business in Europe that has already been enacted effective January 1st, in Asia Pacific and Latin America that is an April 1st timing and Stahl as well would also be on April 1st timing. So in terms of where we're going to end up it's probably too early to tell. We'll have a I think a better sense a little bit further down the road. And it is a competitive environment. But, once again, the company's always proved its ability to get price and we've always have had price exceed raw material inflation at least over the last seven years -- seven, eight years.

Okay.

I'll add some color on that too as well because the 80/20 process which is different for Columbus McKinnon is a lot more insightful on where you actually raise price. So I think instead of just going out to the markets and raising generally speaking, which I think we've demonstrated good traction on a lot more insightful actually where we should be raising price more. So we're also seeing the benefits of that. So I don't think there's any reason for us to be less pessimistic about pricing, we're more optimistic about price.

Okay. That sounds great. And as I guess one more question about some of the profit growth and gross margin, I guess first is just a comment that congratulations on the profit growth 29% year-over-year and some of the other metrics that you called out. But I want to ask one about gross margin on Page 6, some of those buckets. And I wondered, if you were surprised by anything during the quarter that was different versus your expectation to get that little bit of lower gross margin?

Yes. I'm going to have Greg answer that but I want to jump in. Thank you for asking that question, well, we were not surprised at all. This is a seasonally down quarter for us. Every Q3, we have less working days. We have -- it's typically a lower margin period for us. So we saw exactly what we would have expected and we also saw the year-over-year growth that we would expect that. So Greg you want to give some more color on that?

Yes. So on a reported basis, the gross margin year-over-year expanded 90 basis points and that included the impact of and we're beginning to see some of the costs roll in from the Ohio plant closure. We took that out. We had a 100 basis point improvement versus a year ago. I think you're --when you look at it sequentially to Mark's point, the third quarter is typically our seasonally slowest quarter, we have three less working days. We're absorbing less of our fixed costs at our manufacturing facilities. And then, the only other factor this year which impacted us was the rail projects. We had record rail sales this quarter. And those tend to carry a lower gross margin than our typical business although the operating margins are quite strong. It's a business that just doesn't have a lot of SG&A associated with it. So not surprised at all from our perspective it's our seventh quarter in a row of year-over-year gross margin improvement. And expectations would be that we'll continue to drive margin improvement going forward with the operational excellence initiatives as well as the 80/20.

Okay. All right. This sounds great. And if I can ask about, I can see the seasonal change third quarter to fourth quarter. But -- so are we expecting in the fourth quarter a similar improvement in gross margin as you had last year? I guess what kind of range can we think about for gross margin?

Yes. Well, we don't really give guidance on gross margins Walt. But I mean, I think if you look at the track record you can kind of see how it's -- it typically rolls out. It would not be a stretch to say that Q4 gross margins going to be better than Q3 is for sure. Just because there is more shipping days, it's typically our strongest quarter of the year from our revenue perspective. So it's hard for us to pinpoint exactly where we think it's going to end up. There's a lot of moving pieces to it. The one thing I would say is there is a lot of upside as well, but there are some headwinds that were offsetting like tariffs, raw material inflation has been a bit of a headwind this year although that appears to be moderating somewhat.

Okay. All right. Great. Well, thank you very much guys.

Thanks Walt.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Jon Tanwanteng with CJS Securities.

Good morning gentlemen. Thanks for taking my questions and nice job in the quarter.

Thanks Jon.

Yes. Greg, can you talk about the possibility tire and crane business just recently. So we can better model the earnings impact as they're divested. My understanding is that they've improved year-over-year compared to…

Yes. So a great question Jon. So we wanted to make it a little easier for the folks who are modeling this. And so we've included a slide, I'm not sure you've seen it, Slide 17 in our deck which in the appendix section which basically provides the sales and the operating income for the three businesses together for -- so far this year. And so year-to-date we've had about $30 million of revenue 29 and change and about $3.1 million of income from operations. And you can see that on that page that it's actually the income from operation is around 700,000 in the first quarter and it's grown to about a million five in Q2, and then, a million in Q3. One thing I would point out is beginning in Q2 there was about $600,000 of depreciation which was no longer being taken which is a result of the held for sale accounting requirements. And so the reality of it is, as the Q2 and Q3 earnings numbers are really more in EBITDA number. EBITDA is exactly the same as operating income in those two quarters. And so that's part of the change there.

Got it. That's very helpful thanks. And then Mark just going back on a previous question that you've talked about share gain, it's great that you're seeing that now, but what are your competitors doing? Are they noticing at all? Are they standing still? And how much run rate for share gain is that really?

So it's hard for us to really comment on what actions the competition is taking. Historically, we've been in a competitive market I'd like being in competitive markets. It keeps you on your toes. But the key is that we are gaining share and I think we have a lot of headroom in that area. If you look at some of our share over long periods of time I think Columbus McKinnon is maybe taking the eye off the ball and I think we've lost some share. And so I think with this real focus and sense of purpose around what really is going to drive value for our customers and a solid deployment around that. I think we have some very concrete ways to be able to do that. I think one other area that is not really come into the fold yet is in the area of new product development. And this is the third part of our strategy that we're working on that is really part of phase two is how do we ramp our growth engine. And we're just getting started on that. You see some of our variable speed offerings coming out and we have a lot of great ideas that the folks have been working on. So we think there's a lot related to the automation space where we see very solid growth in demand at higher margins and that are growing higher than the market rate. So I think we should think of the strategy is very much about simplification rationalization in the early innings, but as we get into later innings, it's much more about growth. And I think there is a tremendous headroom here.

Got it. That's helpful. And then, finally, it's a long way to 2020 to where you have your targets out there. If there is a downturn in that timeframe, when can we reasonably expect margins to trough? Sales are down 10% or 20% and also given all the things that you are still trying to do to improve the margins in operations till then.

Yes. I'll answer it generally. And I'll see if Greg can answer a little bit more color. Look I think that the business is not recession proof. If there is a recession, obviously, the business will go down. However, I think what we fully expect in a low growth environment that we're going to make excellent progress and we're going make a lot more progress on the bottom line due to our initiatives here. And when you model it, I think the businesses in it perform a lot better than it did in the last downturn of equal magnitude. Greg, do you want to comment?

Yes. So Jon, I think if I understand your question, if sales were to drop say 10% that's roughly a $90 million drop everything else being equal we'd expect to lose 35% to 40% of that. And so it'd be about $36 million. And then, from there there'd be a lot of tactical items we would do to reduce that gap. And I think we would offset I know last time in 2008, I wasn't here, but there was a substantial reduction in SG&A costs. I mean clearly the company would tighten its belt on expenses professional services. It'd readjust the headcount in the factories so their travel. So all of those tactical things would offset some of that margin. And you can look at the historical -- in 2008 how much progress we did there. But I would say the key point that I would say is that where we're going to be starting from a much higher level. And so, if there is a recession two years from now and we're at a 16% or 17% EBITDA margin level by then. Yes, there will be a reduction, but we're coming from a much higher level. And so from that perspective, we'd be better than we have been in the past recessions.

Great. Thanks a lot guys.

Our next question is from the line of Joe Mondillo with Sidoti & Company.

Hi, guys. Just a quick follow-up question. Just wondering as we look towards sort of fiscal '20 and relative to your free cash flow guidance, wondering what your thoughts are on working capital needs as well as CapEx?

Yes. So we haven't actually given CapEx guidance yet. We're just in the early innings of our budgeting process. So let me hold-off on answering that one. I mean we do see room on the inventory side, but as the company ends up getting bigger it will clearly be more of receivables, or as we expect sales to increase to be more receivables or payables as well, but certainly more receivables. So one thing I guess you might want to think about and I'm not sure if you factored in is pension contributions of roughly $12 million a year as the use of cash...

Okay. And so again -- I'm sorry go ahead.

No. In the other item at least in the short-term is the company is having a really strong year. And so there'll be no bonuses paid out to the management team in probably the June timeframe.

Okay. So just to follow-up on the inventory part of it, I mean, if you're seeing sort of just hypothetically let's say low single-digit revenue growth, could you say you could keep your inventory flattish. Is that sort of the kind of ballpark thinking?

Yes. Without actually running the math, I mean the other way I would look at it is from an inventory turns perspective. We're 3.8 turns today. We expect to be close to 4 turns by the end of the calendar year or fiscal year sorry. And we'd like to see some more improvement on that next year.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

Yes, okay.

Okay. Thank you. This concludes our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back to Mark Morelli for closing comments.

Thanks Brenda. Thanks for your interest in Columbus McKinnon. Just for your information, we plan on hosting an Investor and Analyst Day on Thursday June 13th in New York. We plan to update you further on our progress and our plans for our blueprint for growth strategy. So thanks a lot. Have a good day. By now.

Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. And thank you for your participation.