Greetings, and welcome to the Clean Energy Fuels Fourth Quarter and Year End 2015 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I’d now like to turn the conference over to your host Mr. Tony Kritzer, Director of Investor Relations. Go ahead Mr. Kritzer.

Thank you, operator. Earlier this afternoon, Clean Energy released financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ending December 31, 2015. If you did not receive the release, it is available on the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at www.cleanenergyfuels.com, where the call is also being webcast. There will be a replay available on the website for 30 days. Before we begin, we’d like to remind you that some of the information contained in the news release and on this conference call, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Words of expression reflecting optimism, satisfaction with current prospects, as well as words such as believe, intend, expect, plan, should, anticipate, and similar variations, identify forward-looking statements, but their absence does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. Such forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of performance, and the Company’s actual results could differ materially from those contained in such statements. Several factors that could cause or contribute to such differences are described in detail in the Risk Factors section of the Clean Energy’s Form 10-K, filed March 3, 2015. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this release. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements or supply new information regarding the circumstances after the date of this release. The Company’s non-GAAP EPS and adjusted EBITDA will be reviewed on this call, and excludes certain expenses that the Company’s management does not believe are indicative of the Company’s core business operating results. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP results. The directly comparable GAAP information, reasons why management uses non-GAAP information, a definition of non-GAAP EPS and adjusted EBITDA, and a reconciliation between these non-GAAP and GAAP figures is provided in the Company’s press release, which has been furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K today. Participating on today’s call from the Company is President and Chief Executive Officer, Andrew Littlefair; and Chief Financial Officer, Bob Vreeland. And with that, I will turn the call over to Andrew.

Thank you, Tony. Good afternoon everyone and thank you for joining us. I’m going to keep my remarks focused on what we feel are the most important takeaways from 2015 and looking forward into 2016. For the fourth quarter, we delivered 78.3 million gallons to our customers. This is an 8% increase over the 72.4 million gallons we delivered during the fourth quarter of 2014. For the full year, we delivered 308.5 million gallons, 16% or 43-million-gallon increase. I think it’s important to remind everyone that despite the global oil price decline and the rippling effects it has caused throughout the energy industry, we’ve continued to grow our delivered volumes in every single quarter. We’re growing in the most challenging energy market in quite some time and our recurring revenue model is intact. We reported fourth quarter revenue of a $119 million which included $31 million of alternative fuel tax credit. For the full year, we reported revenue of $384 million. Revenue was down compared to last year, principally because of three reasons including lower commodity costs. While lower natural gas commodity prices are good for us and for our customers, they do impact our top line revenue. Revenues were also impacted by continued softness in the global compressor business due to lower oil prices and a strong U.S. dollar. And finally, our station construction revenues were down as compared to 2014 because we completed more station upgrade projects and fewer full stations. All total, we completed 67 station projects in 2015. It is important to note that our station construction projects tend to be cyclical between station upgrades versus full stations. And we anticipate construction revenues in 2016 to benefit from an increase of full station projects. We currently have more refuse station construction projects in the pipeline for…

Ladies and gentlemen, please stand by. Ladies and gentlemen, we do apologize for the inconvenience. Our speaker line has disconnected. Give us one moment, and we’ll get them right back. Sorry about that. Gentlemen, we’re back.

Good. Well, sorry everybody. It looked like our call dropped. I was just wrapping my remarks. Let me just say that our focus for 2016 is very straight forward, deleveraging the balance sheet; conserving cash; and growing volumes. And with that I’ll turn the call over to Bob.

Thank you, Andrew and good afternoon to everyone. Overall we had a good fourth quarter with 8% volume growth from a year ago and positive adjusted EBITDA. As Andrew mentioned, annual volumes grew by 43 million gallons or 16.4%. We’ve seen growth in all of our sectors including refuse, transit, trucking and industrial. On our renewable natural gas, we saw decline compared to 2014 due to the sale of our Dallas biomethane plant at the end of 2014. Our revenues for the fourth quarter of 2015 and for the year were less than the same periods in 2014, which is consistent with what we have seen during the first three quarters of 2015. However, it’s important to note that we have improved our adjusted EBITDA in 2015, despite the lower revenue, in part as a result of lower commodity costs, improved operating results at our compression business, lower SG&A spending, together with gross profit margin benefits from our volume growth. Our gross profit margin per gasoline gallon equivalent for the fourth quarter including our low carbon fuel standards credits or LCFS credits was $0.28 per gallon, which compares to $0.28 per gallon in the fourth quarter of 2014. For clarification, we have included the LCFS credits in our volume related revenue and gross profit margin per gallon similar to how we include our RIN credits in our volume related revenue and margin per gallon, and will continue this approach on a go forward basis. While we have seen some pressure on fuel margins from this low oil and diesel price environment, the environmental credits or RINs in the LCFS have benefited our gross profit margin per gallon in 2015. This is testament to the fact that we have both economics associated with fuelling natural gas and additional economic benefits from…

Thank you, gentlemen. At this time, will be conduction a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Rob Brown from Lake Street Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

On your gallon volume growth, you had nice growth in 2015. What sort of you’re thinking on 2016, should you be able to get double-digit volume growth in 2016 as well?

Rob, we probably don’t typically quote a number on that going forward in giving guidance. But one of the strengths that we have is our recurring model. So, we’re seeing very good continuation of the strength of our refuse business and we’ve actually had some good wins in transit. And our transit customers continue to take transit buses. So, we’ll have increase in volume. I’m not going to go out on a limb right and give you exactly if it’s going to be double digits or not. But we have built in our budget a good volume growth. And I don’t know that it will hit -- for years and years, we are in the 20% range, Rob, or down a little bit on last year, could be a little bit challenge compared to 2015. But I think it will be in that neighborhood because our existing customers continue to take more vehicles.

And then, you talked about a new contract pipeline -- sorry, new contraction pipeline being quite large. Can you talk sort of how many units or what industries they’re for, and maybe scope that a little bit?

We kind of have two buckets of contraction, some of our own account. And when you look at that CapEx, you have to take out -- $25 million, you have take out a portion of that for some trailers that will happen at our Natural Gas Advantage subsidiary. The remainder or the majority of it’s for new stations. And those are for our account; those are station that we own. And you can figure, those stations range around $1.5 million apiece or so. Some of that money in that $25 million will go to open up our truck-stop stations, as we make some of those; we had some CNG to it and things like that. But the bulk of our construction, which should be on the par, I would say in terms of just building stations, if you think of that that way, we did, as I said in my remarks, 57 or so last year. We’ll be in that almost identical, if not up a few from that. Most of those stations will be for our customers and we sell those stations for those customers. And majority of that will be worked and we’ll do for our refuse customers. We really have seen our refuse customers across the board continue to add vehicles, add stations. As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we kind of see the construction business ebb and flow, Republic is good example and so is Waste. But, Republic will build stations for Republic in one given year. The next year, they add another 10 or so percent of vehicles at those sites. And so, we will necessarily build more stations, will increase the size of those stations. And then the next year we typically add more stations and so goes. So, the majority of the stations that we’ll see in our construction business will go for refuse. And then we will have pretty good business this year on the transit side, some of which we announced yesterday.

And then last question on your balance sheet. I think you said you paid down your -- good chunk of your convert in the first quarter here. What’s sort of your plan? I guess it’s due in August. Do you plan to pay -- kind of what’s the timing on that rest of that payment, and what’s your plan there?

What we said, Rob, is we would take care of it, before it’s due, right? We have several months. And so, it’s really a balance of using cash and stock. We would rather -- to the extent, we are going to use stock, we’d like it to be at a higher price and because it therefore will be less dilutive to the Company and its shareholders. And so we will keep an eye on that. We are in very close communication, as you would imagine with those noteholders, having just sent them something $60 million. They understand what we are trying to do, as they are working with us, I think in a very cooperative fashion. And because there wasn’t really anything in those notes that would allow us to prepay. So, they are working with us. And we would like to use as much cash as possible. And so I would say, just watch us over the next several months, as we look to what the oil price does and other things. In the sort of in the summer here, we’ll begin to take care of, clean it all up.

Our next question comes from the line of Eric Stine from Craig Hallum. Please proceed with your question.

Maybe just [ph] an overall market picture, I mean clearly the people on the fence are probably not doing a whole lot. But just curious, are you seeing any changes to the plans as some of the first movers, any changes in behavior from the shippers due to low oil prices?

Eric, you have it exactly the way I talk about it. I mean if you kind of break our business down and you have those customers that have been with us a long time, and I don’t see that there is -- has any -- hasn’t been really any chink in the armor. Those refuse customers, I mean there hasn’t been a one that has -- that decided to go back to diesel. And really that’s been the case even in our over-the-road trucking customers. UPS is continuing to move forward on big deployment of natural gas trucks. But certainly, our transit customers and our refuse guys are moving forward. And I really feel like the economics are still there. We have to remind for the people on the call, let’s remember, we still have an economic proposition, not as good as it was a year ago. But we are still saving versus the other fuel. And Eric, the other I think important point is with all of this going on, with the climate change and talks in Paris, and what you see all the time is sustainability is and continues to be really important thing that these consumer companies, what we call the shippers, they are very mindful of that. And the new rule’s being talked about in California going forward, starting the next couple of years. The introduction of low NOx engines has really kind of raised the bar in terms of NOx emissions. And so, look, this isn’t lost. I spoke to the executive leadership of the American Trucking Association out here in California a month ago, and they are very mindful of fact that the bar continues to be raised in terms of them being cleaner and less carbon. So, right now, while we’re a little pressed on the economics, the payouts gone from maybe at $1 -- maybe one year payback little longer to -- now it’s closer to two years, we still have an economic offering. And our shipper friends are still putting pressure on our contracted carriers to look for the cleanest option. And so, you’re right. Those that were on the fence this -- $1.60 diesel in the Southeast, this has been very challenging, and I understand why they continue to watch. And those people that have been invested continue to move forward with the program.

And maybe just sticking with the emissions angle, there’s been a lot of chatter lately about pairing Redeem with the low NOx 8.9-liter that I believe is coming out next month. Just curious, I mean are there any fleet opportunities you see out there that are weighting on that engine? And then maybe any government programs whether it’s Prop 1B funding or others that fit into that?

It’s a good point, Eric. I think we really have captured fuels. In fact there was a conference, industry conference, pretty well attended out here at Long Beach couple of weeks ago where it was called game changer, and it was the introduction of this low NOx engine. And remember this engine is 90% less NOx and you compare it -- I mean sorry you combine it with our Redeem product and you’re 90% less carbon. That’s really powerful. In my remarks, I said it’s even -- it’s cleaner than electric vehicle. And it’s substantially cleaner than anything that’s on the books right now. So, we see that as very important thing in the future. It won’t come to the 12-liter for another couple of years in 2018. You are exactly right, that engine is now -- if you are ready to order one of those engines, you go to the OEMs and that process is kind of in the works, as we speak. I think you are going to see some efforts to put these engines with that fuel in the port of LA as they continue to work on cleaning up the environment down there. There’s talk of new standards in California where a portion of renewable natural gas will be required, going forward. So, yes, I really think that for natural gas the renewable fuel is going to be an important piece, as well as this engine. I’m excited about it because it really ups the game, ups the ante for all the other competing alternative fuels. I mean the electrics can’t there on heavy duty on cost basis, and other fuels are just really miles behind. So, when we get a little help on the oil price, you’re going to be able to see really powerful economics again and this environmental advantage with the low NOx and with the low carbon fuel.

Maybe just last one from me, just on the SG&A, just any thoughts on additional levers there; good to see that come down again, just wondering how we should think about that trending in 2016?

Hi, Eric; it’s Bob. Trending, there’s room there. I don’t know that it’ll reduce every single quarter but there’s more room to -- that that will trend a little bit down, probably for the whole year.

We’ve made additional trim, additional reduction. Keep in mind, we’re growing. And so there’s a limit here. I mean, as Bob mentioned for the last couple of years, we’ve grown 40% on volume or so and we’ve reduced our SG&A by 18% or whatever it is. And we’re continuing to cut this year. We’re beginning to get to the point where it’s -- we’re getting kind of close to I think being at about the right level on the SG&A spending. So, I guess if you look at it going forward, if you’re doing some modeling, you’re beginning to get it about I think where you could kind of level it off, at this level. We may see it come down a little bit more.

Right. And that’s just because some of the actions that we’ve taken. You haven’t seen a full year in ‘15, and so it’s not so much about taking more actions, it’s about kind of feeling the effects of what we’ve already done for a full year. But that ends up being a little bit less than say, if you were to go in and start taking some other actions.

Our next question comes from the line of Ian Scime with Highbridge Capital. Please proceed with your question.

This is really just a housekeeping item. So, first off, we’re really encouraged to see the proactive measures that you guys are taking to address the balance sheet. So just a quick question on VETC. Additional $31 million that you guys got came in after quarter-end, correct? So, if I think about your pro forma cash before the debt repurchases, it’s actually closer to $180 million. Is that correct?

Yes, we received that here in the last week.

And then going forward, it’s on a quarterly basis, correct?

Yes. And there is a filing piece. So, we’ll recognize it in our numbers for sure. The collection then is a little bit depending upon the U.S. government.

Our next question comes from the line of Pavel Molchanov from Raymond James. Please proceed with your question.

First, kind of a small housekeeping follow-up on the previous question. What was operating cash flow in Q4? It was still negative because you hadn’t collected the VETC, is that right?

Yes. It was about negative 11 in Q4.

Okay, got it.

So, because we were year-to-date about negative 1, and we ended 2015 at negative 12.

Okay, perfect. And then little more broadly. So, you guys have had some PR about supplying LNG fuel ships on the West Coast. There was a deal signed couple of weeks ago between Shell and Maersk to develop the LNG marine fuel market. Is that still kind of an early stage opportunity or are you actually seeing some more substance to that addressable market?

I think it’s still early. But, as I think you pointed out, it seems to continue to -- we keep seeing twins pop up here and there. I think there has been a few other ship announcements on both coasts. It seems like there is a trend there but it’s slow, right? You’ve got to repower these ships, it takes time and drydock and these engines, it seems to me slow. So, I don’t think you are going to see it hockey stick here but it seems like there is more happening all the time on that front.

Okay. Is there any hope for LNG volumes because it seems like they’re on a continual downward trend for you guys?

They’re a little flat, yes. but -- and I would say there is hope. Yes, absolutely because…

Yes, I think so. I think you are going to see -- our view is that as the adoption rate picks up -- I mean it’s going to be essentially flat I think on the heavy duty trucking side. We saw -- LNG was flat mainly, the trucking increased actually but it was flat because of the oil patch and where we’re selling LNG and the oil patch. So, last year that part of the business, the stationary part was down. I think that over a longer period of time, and leaving the oil patch aside and have small plants and some other things that we’ve done is that we still believe, and I know you and I have disagreed over time on this but we see that the LNG will be viable in the regular part of the business. It’s been successful. Our Raven friends who have just added more trucks here that we’ve released yesterday and we have some other customers that are doing the same. So, I think as we kind of get by this environment where it’s been relatively flat, where you see the CNG versus LNG split got 70-30 or so, I still think there is plenty of room for the LNG. So, I think and over time, as this spreads and goes into more fleets, gets a little deeper into the country and it becomes the more sleeper cast, [ph] more a regular route, you will see LNG take a good care of that market because of the advantages that it has range and weight and another things.

There are no further questions at this time. I’d like to turn the conference back over to Andrew Littlefair for any closing comments.

Good. Thank you, operator. And thank you all for dialing in this afternoon. We look forward to updating you all on our progress next quarter. Bye-bye. Thank you.