Keith Jennings
Analyst · Wasserstein
Thank you, Tim, and good morning, everyone. Slide 6 shows our consolidated headline results for the fourth quarter and full year. All references to adjusted EBITDA in my commentary will be adjusted EBITDA excluding lower cost of market, LCM, and LIFO impacts, except for Slide 13, which uses adjusted EBITDA, as reported, to align with our covenant calculations.For the fourth quarter, revenue and adjusted EBITDA were $774.8 million and $49.9 million, respectively, both of which declined versus prior year's record fourth quarter performance. Full year 2019 results for revenue and adjusted EBITDA were $3.4 billion and $262.8 million, both declined 1.3% and 12.6% year-over-year, respectively. $321 million of incremental annual revenues from higher volumes were more than offset by $309 million of price decline and $56 million of reduced revenues from the San Antonio divestiture. WTI on average was 12% lower in 2019 versus 2018, which drove the price compression. The lower year-over-year earnings results for both the quarter and the full year were primarily driven by the absence of the wide crude differentials that drove the prior year's record performance for the fuel segment. This year-over-year contribution from fuel segment was partially offset by solid growth from our core specialty business.On Slide 7, we have provided a detailed bridge of the 2019 consolidated adjusted EBITDA results relative to full year 2018. Starting with last year's $300.8 million of full year consolidated adjusted EBITDA, the primary driver in the year-over-year decline in annual results was the lower fuels margins seen across the year, which more than offset $35 million of hedge gains, contract and local rack price improvements in the fuel segments, resulting in a headwind of approximately $80 million. This meaningful year-over-year margin headwind in our fuels business was partially offset by the $57 million of earnings from consolidated volume improvement, $38 million of which was in fuels and $19 million in specialty. Additionally, our specialty business captured $11.7 million of margin improvement across the year, despite the fourth quarter market challenges. The $17.9 million headwind of higher operating costs is primarily a function of the year-over-year impact of receiving the 2017 RINs in 2018. This more than offset the lower other operating and transportation cost improvements. Finally, we invested $6.2 million more in SG&A to support our specialty strategy. This is also including some onetime costs related to optimizing our SAP implementation. These onetime investments were in the first half of the year and are not in our current run rate. Our total $262.8 million of adjusted EBITDA for the full year 2019 is a solid reflection of the quality of our businesses and our people.Slide 8 reviews the quarter and full year highlights of the results of our specialty segment. Our fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA result of $42.8 million declined 5.3% compared to last year's fourth quarter. While this hit the scheduled, Shreveport turnaround was executed on time and within our cost expectations, the activities did weigh on volumes. Additionally, the fourth quarter saw continued margin headwinds in the paraffinic base oil market, which were partially offset by strong performance across our Finished Lubricants business. For the full year, the specialty segment delivered adjusted EBITDA of $207.9 million. These were strong results, which represent approximately 24% growth versus the prior year. The improved performance was driven by solid growth in sales volumes across several of our key product categories, specifically, specialty volumes -- specialty solvents, naphthenic base oils and Finished Lubricants.As Tim mentioned earlier, improving the margin performance of our core specialty business has been a key focal point in both our transformation and growth strategies. That focus was apparent in both the fourth quarter and full year. For the fourth quarter, we were still able to capture EBITDA margins of 14.2%, an improvement of 50 basis points versus the prior year. These were strong results given the seasonal slowdown in demand that is typical of the fourth quarter. This improvement was supported by strong sales mix, which came as a result of rationalizing more than 2,000 barrels per day of lower-margin production from our business. Ongoing rationalization of the low-margin products made a significant impact across the year as 2019 EBITDA margins were 15.4%, an improvement of 320 basis points compared to full year 2018. This improvement reflects the ongoing effort to upgrade our sales mix and focus our production towards more profitable product offerings. This improved volume performance also drove fixed cost leverage. Notably, we successfully crossed our near-term threshold of EBITDA margins in excess of 15%, which has been a near-term objective for this business.Our fourth quarter gross profit per barrel results point of $30.94 is lower seasonally and also declined 3.2% compared to the year prior as gross profit was impacted by tighter crude differentials. Our full year gross profit per barrel results of $34.41 grew by 7.2% compared to full year 2018. This goal reflects much of the same drivers of our EBITDA margins, mainly the improved volume performance and the benefits of an improving sales mix.Turning to Slide 9, we bridge the full year 2019 specialty products adjusted EBITDA. Starting with the largest [indiscernible] of $168.3 million of adjusted EBITDA after resegmentation, expanding specialty margins and higher volumes contributed $11.7 million and $19 million of improvement, respectively. Our operating costs across the business declined slightly, contributing $2.2 million to our improved results. Our self-help programs contributed significantly to reductions in certain transportation-related costs, which contributed $8.1 million across the year. These year-over-year gains were partially offset by targeted investments in SG&A expenses, which increased $1.4 million versus the prior year, bringing our full year adjusted EBITDA total to $207.9 million.On Slide 10, we review the highlights of our fuel segment's results for the fourth quarter and full year. Fourth quarter and full year adjusted EBITDA results were $28.7 million and $152.5 million, respectively, as both the quarter and the year declined versus the prior year. This decline was driven by the significantly tighter crude differentials as the wide differentials that benchmark WTI of both our WCS and Midland price crude sources that benefited 2018 did not repeat sustainably across the fourth quarter nor the full year 2019.Fuel production volumes declined 1.9% for the quarter. However, this marginal decline reflects primarily reduced volumes after divesting the San Antonio Refinery and the impact of the turnaround activity at our Shreveport facility. Despite this marginal decline in the fourth quarter, for the full year, we made meaningful headway in improving our production volumes, which were up 8.8%. The production volume growth reflected the improvement in throughput and stronger utilization across our assets that Tim mentioned at the top of the call. Our gross profit per barrel performance of $3.51 and $3.34 in both the quarter and full year, respectively, were down compared to results from the prior year. Again, this was primarily driven by the significant tighter crude differentials that drove 2018 results.On Slide 11, we bridge the annual fuels adjusted EBITDA performance versus the prior year. Starting with $230 million after resegmentation, we were negatively impacted by the $80 million net decline in fuels margins as the wide crude differential that persisted through 2018 was -- were largely absent through 2019. This headwind was partially offset by improved volumes, which contributed $38 million in additional adjusted EBITDA, reflecting record asset utilization and improved throughput, particularly at Great Falls. Higher operating expenses and other miscellaneous costs were headwinds which mainly reflect the decline in the value of small refinery exemptions compared to the prior year and the absence of the RINs exemptions from the previously divested Superior Refinery. Lastly, our annual results benefited from a $1.7 million improvement in SG&A, bringing our full year adjusted EBITDA to $152.5 million. This is a strong result for the fuels business, given the challenging market environment seen across most of the year.On Slide 12, we reconcile more sources and uses of cash across the year. For most of you who have been following our progression, since 2015, we have emphasized improved cash flow performance to measure the results of our strategic initiatives and improvements across our business. We started 2018 with $155.7 million. We generated $209.7 million in cash flow from operations in 2019. An enhanced focus on driving cash returns and improved working capital management helped deliver results. We received approximately $55 million in net cash proceeds associated with the November divestiture of our San Antonio fuels refinery as well as $14.3 million in additional cash from other investing activities, which was primarily inventory financing. $343 million of cash was used to repay debt. Additionally, capital expenditures for the year came in at the lower end of our guidance range at $73 million for the year. We closed the year with cash on hand of about $19.1 million.Slide 13 provides a synopsis of our credit metrics, which continue to make meaningful improvement as we execute our transformation. As noted at the start of my comments, adjusted EBITDA for these calculations are as reported. This aligns with our covenants and include LCM and LIFO. Our own credit metrics improved significantly by the end of 2019 compared to a year ago. Our leverage declined to 4x debt to trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA, a 1.6 turn improvement from the 5.6x level we reported at the end of 2018. In addition, our fixed charge coverage ratio improved to 2.3x, up 0.6 turns from the 1.7x at the end of 2018. At the close of 2019, our liquidity totaled $379 million between cash on hand and undrawn availability on our revolving credit facility, down $72 million from year-end 2018. This was largely a result of our actions to reduce our debt outstanding. It is worth noting that despite this year-over-year decline, we have ample liquidity to effectively manage our business, particularly after closing the sale of our San Antonio Refinery, which, by itself, disproportionately consumed liquidity. We expect to continue driving our leverage lower and our fixed charge coverage higher as we continue to progress against our strategic transformation.With that, I will turn the call back over to Tim.