Good day, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Quarter 1 2013 CECO Environmental Earnings Conference Call. My name is Matthew, and I will be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded for replay purposes. And now I would like to turn the call over to Mr. Benton Cook, interim CFO. Please proceed, Sir.

Good morning, everyone. Also joining us on the call this morning will be our Chairman, Phil DeZwirek; and our CEO, Jeff Lang. Before we begin, I would like to caution investors regarding forward-looking statements. Any statements made in today's presentation that are not based on historical fact are forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on certain estimates and expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual future results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We encourage you to read the risks described in our SEC filings, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Except to the extent required by applicable securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update or publicly revise any of the forward-looking statements that you may hear today, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Today's presentation will also include references to certain non-GAAP financial measures reconciled to the comparable GAAP and non-GAAP numbers in today's press release. Before I turn the call over to Jeff, I would like to comment on a few key results for the first quarter of 2013. Net sales were $34.4 million as compared to $33 million in the same period of 2012. Gross profit increased by 9.8% to $11.2 million as compared to $10.2 million in 2012. Gross margin increased to 32.6%, compared to 30.9% for the same quarter. Operating income decreased to $3.2 million in 2013, compared to $3.7 million in 2012. Non-GAAP operating income adjusted for transaction-related costs, including legal accounting, banking, retention payments, burnout expenses and amortization of intangibles related to recent acquisitions increased to $4.6 million, compared to $3.8 million, a 21.1% improvement over the same period of 2012. Operating margin decreased to 9.6% from 11.2% in 2012. Non-GAAP operating margin, adjusted as noted, increased to 13.4%, compared to 11.5%. Net income increased to $2.2 million in 2013 as compared to net income of $2 million in 2012. Non-GAAP net income, adjusted as noted, increased to $3.3 million, compared to $2.1 million. Net income per diluted share was $0.12 in 2013 as compared to $0.12 in 2012. Non-GAAP net income per diluted share, adjusted as noted, increased to $0.18 in 2013, compared to $0.13 in 2012. Bookings in Q1 of 2013 were $37.6 million, compared to $30.7 million in 2012, an increase of 22.5%. And backlog as of March 31, 2013 was $75.8 million, compared to $59.5 million as of December 31, 2012 and $52.6 million as of March 31, 2012. And now I'll turn the call over to our CEO, Jeff Lang.

Thank you, Ben. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for participating in the CECO's Q1 earnings call. We appreciate your continuing interest in CECO Environmental as we grow and execute on our strategies. Q1 was a solid operating performance for us in conjunction with executing on 3 significant smart accretive acquisitions. Our goal is to build the platform within the air pollution control and product recovery sector. We positioned the company well for an excess of $300 million in revenues for 2014, given our M&A activities and our definitive commitments. We continue to build a strong diverse global and market customer base to ensure we grow and prosper through various business climates and not tied to 1 or 2 markets, or 1 or 2 regions. Just a quick note on our future platform that we were building and we took some actions in Q1 to do that. In looking at CECO and Met-Pro and Aarding and Adwest, based in 2012 actual numbers, you can easily calculate we're moving close to that $300 million in revenues on an annual basis. And if we add in normal growth for 2013 and 2014, we're getting into some very exciting levels for the CECO team going forward. This has been our aspiration for a while now and we're very glad it is all coming together. So brief comments on the quarter. As Ben mentioned, we hit $4.6 million in adjusted non-GAAP operating income versus $3.8 million in operating income the previous quarter. Bookings were up 22%, higher than last year, including organic and some inorganic activities. Our backlog is at an all-time high of $75 million, almost $76 million in size, with good gross profit baked in. As Ben noted, our bookings were up 22%. But as -- if we look at our year-to-date April…

[Operator Instructions] And the first question comes from the line of Ajay Kejriwal of FBR Capital Markets.

So maybe if you can provide a little bit more color on the acquisitions of Aarding and Adwest. How did they perform in the quarter? And what's the contribution to the top line? And the reason I ask is last call, you talked about Adwest, I think $12 million revenue run rate. And if they performed in line with that, just a math if it would suggest that the base business declined in the quarter. So maybe just a little bit color on the base business and the acquisition performance.

Yes. Adwest did a pretty good job in the quarter. We focused on the integration, which we got through successfully as planned. It had a pretty solid quarter with bookings and revenue. And actually, some of their revenues made up for some of the CECO abatement -- a little bit of a CECO abatement business that saw a little decline in the quarter. So Adwest is performing well. And the Aarding piece, they had a solid quarter. But, again, we only picked up March for Aarding. They picked up -- they had a nice quarter and some nice operating income contributions and helped our accretiveness to growing gross profit. But we're excited to have Aarding for the full year. Of course, if we had Aarding for the full quarter, we would've been much higher, probably closer to $40 million in revenues for the quarter. But they both performed as planned, and they both contributed to our performance in the quarter.

Okay. So if they performed in line, is it fair to say base business declined about 10%?

No. I wouldn't say that. I probably have to take a look at that. Probably a little bit, probably more like a 5% decline. We had some projects with CECO abatement that were pushed out and that business had not performed. But the Adwest business and their technology helped us through the quarter, which was part of the strategic reason for acquiring Adwest.

Okay. So how should we think about the base business? I know you talked about April bookings as positive. But then, CECO abatement sounds like you're seeing some end market issues. So just talk through the rest of the year, what the expectations on the base business.

Pretty solid. If you look at year-to-date April, our numbers are coming in around $54 million for April bookings versus $40 million of 2012. Just back of the envelope, we're showing probably about $4 million of that came through the Aarding and Adwest, but $10 million of that growth came from the core business.

Got it. And then maybe on that $1.3 million in onetime expenses, could you provide color on how much of that is burnout and amortization of intangibles versus the rest of it? And then what's your expectation on these -- or not in intangibles. Do they go away the rest of the year? Or would you expect more of these?

I will -- we would expect more of those, probably consistent from the quarter. I would say the bulk of it was from banking fees, legal fees and such and auditing fees. So I think most of that would be in the M&A legal and banking and accounting fees. And the smaller portion of that would be in the amortization side of it.

Okay. So the amortization would stay, but then the onetime, the bulk of it would go away. I guess, that's the...

Well, we're continuing to do M&A activity through the Met-Pro acquisition. So we're going to see an acceleration of M&A transaction-related expenses as we go through the year, Ajay.

Okay. And then maybe one on the -- and it's a detailed question. But inventories were up sequentially. Just a little bit more color on what was driving that.

Yes. Our inventories were pretty flat for the year for the core business. But when we picked up Aarding and we picked up Adwest, that added the additional inventories because they both have small shops, they outsource quite a bit. So I would say the inventory growth had to do with the acquisitions.

Your next question comes from the line of Rob Stone of Cowen and Company.

I wanted to ask Jeff about the timing of revenues a little bit. It seems like uncompleted contracts jumped $6.6 million or something quarter-on-quarter. So I get the sense that perhaps part of the revenue softness in Q1 is just a question of timing. Is that correct?

Yes, that's a good observation. Thank you for mentioning that. With the backlog, it's $75 million. There's a lot of pent-up backlog that we're working on, and our objective is to finish those projects up in Q2 and Q3 to generate a greater topline growth. So that's correct.

So in addition to getting a full quarterly run rate for Aarding going forward, there's the issue of not necessarily having Q1 be reflective of an annual run rate?

No, no. With the backlog growing in some of the projects still in the queue to be finished up, yes. And plus, Q1 is typically our lowest quarter for revenues. So our anticipation is to see much stronger revenue growth as we go through the year, complete the backlog, convert it to revenues. And then get a fuller year on the Aarding business, which, I think when we announced the press release for Aarding there in the $35 million, $37 million revenue range.

Okay. My next question has to do with how we should think about the operating expense run rate, excluding acquisition-related items, which we expect to back out. I was struck the fact that your expenses exceed -- the onetime items were more or less flat sequentially despite having Adwest for a full quarter and Aarding for a month. So how should we think about the run rate of expenses on a full quarter basis with both of those acquisitions baked in?

Good question. First off, we paid meticulous attention to our operating costs. And I think we're pretty flat to last year from around 19% SG&A as a percent of sales. So we're at $6.3 million for the quarter last year and up to $6.6 million this year, but I think that was due to the acquisitions of Aarding and Adwest. So we're trying to stay within that 18%, 19% of sales, Rob. That's our goal. And we'll probably see a slight pick up because we only -- you had only picked up 1 month of Aarding. So you'll see a little increase, a little growth in SG&A and operating expenses because you haven't -- we haven't seen a full quarter yet of Aarding. But we think we're going to be able to stay around 19% or better on SG&A as a percent of sales, exclusive of M&A-related expenses.

Okay. And so to help us in calculating a cash EPS or non-GAAP adjusted earnings going forward, Ben, can you say what the quarterly run rate of intangible amortization should be going forward?

Well, the run rate is going to accelerate when you're looking at the amortization for Aarding because there is only 1 month in there at this point in time. We are still finalizing all of those valuations also. So they're not fully complete yet. By the end of Q2, we will have a much better feel for that.

Okay. But if we did some credit pro rata because they're within there for a month, we could at least get a rough guess for the run rate going forward?

Rough guess, yes.

Okay. My final question, Jeff, has to do with the China demand picture. We've detected some concerns about possible slowing of GDP there and what does the Chinese economy look like. How would you characterize the demand drivers for projects in China in terms of retrofits of existing capacity versus new greenfield expansions?

Yes, a good question, Rob. We're seeing some nice uptick in our bookings in China. And we've added sales engineers into China and new products and with the Met-Pro acquisition and the Adwest, we have aspirations to grow China significantly. It's a major pillar in our growth strategy. But the answer -- the short answer to your question is probably a mix. I would probably say 2/3 of our activity is for existing plants for air pollution control and product recovery, and perhaps 1/3 for greenfield. And that's a rough estimate.

So that's being driven by more stringent requirements on the existing assets being driven by the government?

Right. By the Ministry of Environmental Protection Group enforcing their 12th Five-Year Plan to improve their quality. A lot of our sales around product recovery were -- not only clings here but it sends back the product to the original raw state in the manufacturing process. So -- but we're excited about China. And I know you're reading a lot about the air quality and GDP numbers. But we remain pretty bullish on China long term, and we're investing in China long term.

Your next question comes from the line of Sean Hannon of Needham & Co.

The first one, I'm not sure if I heard this specifically addressed a little bit earlier in the Q&A, but in terms of the bookings and backlog growth, do you have a sense -- or could you provide us with a sense, Jeff, of what that was from an organic standpoint, kind of part one? And then thanks for all the color around the major order bookings. Could you also provide some additional color on that growth in backlog?

Yes. Sure, Sean. I think the year-to-date bookings for April, roughly -- probably 2/3 of it were organic and 1/3 of it was inorganic, so that's kind of where we're looking at that $14 million of year-over-year bookings growth, probably $10 million was organic and roughly $4 million was through acquisition. And color regarding the backlog, I think it's quite high, and I think the gross margin baked into the backlog is very good. So if you look at the last few quarters of gross profit, we're kind of thinking that's what the future is going to be in gross profit. But the teams have weekly metrics and the project execution is very focused on improving the gross profit through the fabrication and execution stage. So it wouldn't surprise me if we exceeded a little bit on gross profit.

Okay, that's very helpful. And then you had mentioned that you're seeing some particular strength within quoting activity. So I just wanted to see if you could perhaps dive in a little bit deeper there, any color around what might be coming through regionally or from a product standpoint that may be standing out.

Well, we focus on that pretty regularly, and we just had a meeting with our General Managers. So the cyclone division is seeing some nice activity. A lot of it, for the Fisher-Klosterman is domestic, the Buell division is seeing domestic and global activity. Our utility business, traditionally -- the traditional utility business is continuing some nice bookings activity. So power plants, both traditional power and natural gas, are showing some nice quotation activity. Our Filter business is up. Contract, Parts and Service saw very a moderate Q1. But they're showing an uptick in Q2 with activity for Contract, Parts and Services. So I hope that answers your questions.

That actually is very helpful. And then last question for me. Have you had much conversation with your customers or potential customers on the Met-Pro transaction? And can you characterize the feedback you've received so far, and perhaps where you think or might be a little bit more encouraged that you could really further penetrate some of the share or the spend there?

Yes, that's a good question. And capturing more share of wallet is our objective. There is cost out synergies with the Met-Pro CECO combination, but there is substantial revenue generation opportunities in growing the business. We've talked to shareholders, research analysts and customers, and the feedback we're getting has all been positive. We already have the teams looking at introducing new products into China to grow the business because keep in mind, the products that CECO -- the great technology and products that CECO and Met-Pro have, there's pretty much no overlap. So it's all accretive in terms of if you're sitting in front of a customer and you're talking about the 3 or 4 engineered technologies that CECO provides and the 3 or 4 engineered technologies that Met-Pro provides, you now have a broader bandwidth of an engineered solution for the end user. So thus far, all our feedback has been positive. The technical sales organizations are excited because they see it as an opportunity to provide greater solutions to their customers. So we're quite pleased that the feedback has been great. And quite honestly, I haven't heard anything that hasn't been favorable regarding the CECO Met-Pro combination.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question comes from the line of Larry Schumacher of Morgan Stanley.

Do you have a new -- I don't know if this question was asked or not, I might have missed it. Do you have a new profit margin expectation based on the recent acquisitions that were done, or that are being digested?

Yes. We have some internal aspirations. We haven't shared those publicly, Larry. We don't publish a lot of guidance right now. Maybe next year when we get to be a significantly larger company, we could provide some guidance. But we have aspirations to exceed last year's performance in operating margins and gross profit. But we haven't published that publicly. And the strategic M&A requirements that the CECO Board of Directors has is to make sure when we do smart acquisitions, it's accretive to our performance in many ways. So that's one of our criteria for doing a transaction. But the goal is year-over-year improvement, but we haven't published anything specifically, Larry.

I would now like to turn the call over to Jeff Lang, CEO of CECO Environmental for the closing remarks.

Thank you for joining our call this morning, and we look forward to working with you in the future.

Thank you for joining today's conference, ladies and gentlemen. This includes the presentation. You may now disconnect. Have a great good day.