Welcome to BW LPG's Fourth Quarter 2018 Financial Results Presentation. We will begin shortly. You will be walked through the presentation by BW LPG's CEO, Martin Ackerman; and CFO, Elaine Ong. They will be pleased to address any questions after the presentation. [Operator Instructions] Certain statements in this conference call may constitute forward-looking statements based upon management's current expectations and include known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which BW LPG is unable to predict or control, that may cause BW LPG's actual results, performance or plans to differ materially from any future results, performance or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In addition, nothing in this conference call constitutes an offer to purchase or sell or solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell any securities. With that, I am now pleased to turn the call over to BW LPG's CEO, Martin Ackerman. Thank you, sir. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Anna. Welcome to the presentation of BW LPG's results for the fourth quarter of 2018, the financial period ending 31st of December. I'm joined by our CFO, Elaine Ong, as always. And we appreciate your interest, and we will take questions at the end of the call. The Baltic VLGC index relevant for VLGC's earnings went up 33% in the fourth quarter of 2018 compared to the previous quarter, an average at $43.3 per ton or $25,300 per day. The Baltic Index reached the year high at $48.3 per ton in October, but started to soften in November. The primary reasons for an overall rebound into the freight market for the fourth quarter are as follows. Improved price spreads between the U.S. Gulf and Far East supported the widening of geographical arbitrage in the fourth quarter of 2018. North America seaborne exports grew by 12% in the fourth quarter of the year year-over-year. Exports to China decreased in fourth quarter, but more volumes were absorbed by Japan and Southeast Asia due to the U.S.-China trade bet. This supported overall ton miles. Middle East seaborne export volumes increased 2% year-on-year as Iranian volumes were offset by increased exports from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE. However, VLGC freight rates weakened again from November onwards, driven by cold winter in the U.S. causing higher-than-normal fourth quarter domestic LPG consumption, a sharp reduction in oil price and OPEC production cuts. Looking further into 2019, we expect continued high U.S. LPG production and consumption reverting to normal levels to support widening of the geographical LPG price spreads. This should support a recovery in freight rates. For the full year of 2019, we remain cautiously optimistic due to sustained U.S. LPG production growth and incremental export volumes being added from other key loading…

Thanks, Martin. Starting with our income statement on Slide 10. Our net revenue for the quarter was $85 million compared with $79 million in the same quarter last year. This is mostly due to the recovery in LPG spot earnings. EBITDA came in at $36 million for the quarter. We recognized the provision for vessel impairment of $34 million, mainly driven by ship brokers reducing their vessel value estimates in the quarter. Loss per share before non-recurring items was less than $0.01 per share. Including the non-recurring charges, we recorded a loss of $0.24 per share for the quarter. Turning to Slide 11, we provide a snapshot of our balance sheet and cash flow position. We continue to maintain our leverage ratio of 56%, and we ended the quarter with cash and cash equivalents of $50 million. On Slide 12 you'll see our net debt position at $1.2 billion at the end of the quarter. Total liquidity, consisting of available cash and undrawn facilities, was $215 million. We currently have 5 debt facilities: $800 million facility with $337 million outstanding and $165 million of undrawn credit; a $400 million ECA facility with $324 million outstanding; a $225 million ECA financing with $181 million outstanding; a third ECA facility at $290 million with $257 million outstanding; and finally, a $150 million term loan with $136 million outstanding.We are in vast discussions with our banks regarding the refinancing of our $800 million facility maturing in November 2020. We will announce the details of the refinancing once the documentation is finalized. In December 2018, all existing loan facility agreements were amended to reduce the minimum adjusted equity ratio from 35% to 25%, and the minimum BW Group ownership was reduced from 35% to 20%. The covenant related to BW Group's ownership in BW…

Thank you, Elaine. So if you please turn to Slide 13, then I will summarize our presentation. Earnings per share before non-recurring items was below $0.01, including the non-recurring charges we recorded a loss of $0.24 per share for the fourth quarter. We would also like to highlight the subsequent events. On January 21, 2019, BW Helios was delivered for recycling in accordance with Hong Kong convention, generating US$7 million in liquidity and a net book gain of US$2 million. Secondly, on February 25, 2019, BW LPG established the Product Services Division to support the core shipping business. The Product Services Division will provide existing and new customers with reliable and integrated LPG delivery services. This initiative is expected to translate into improved fleet utilization and better returns for our shareholders. We've been working on the Product Services Division for more than a year. And as you can expect, we have been very thorough in the process of evaluation, feasibility studies, risk and credit management system set up, et cetera. A dedicated team is now in place, including product trading, operations, risk management and credit management, and the team will further enjoy the support of the existing BW LPG infrastructure and client relationships.For the sake of clarity, I wish to emphasize that Product Services will not take decisions involving LPG product price exposure, but will hedge all transactions.First and foremost, our focus is to deliver the best possible shipping solution to new and existing clients, whereas Product Service is an extra in toolbox to increase our shipping performance. In addition, we believe that the even closer focus on the product markets will improve our overall service offerings as well as provide us with deeper intelligence on the freight markets. Our current contract coverage for 2019 stands at 13%. Looking further into 2019, we expect continued high U.S. LPG production and consumption reverting to normal levels of support widening of the geographical LPG price spreads. This should support a recovery in freight rates. We remain cautiously optimistic for the full year of 2019 due to sustained U.S. LPG production growth and incremental export growth from all U.S. loading areas as well as Australia and Canada.We maintain our neutral view on the Middle East VLGC exports as incremental regional growth is expected to compensate for the effects of the reimposed sanctions on Iran and effects from the announced OPEC cuts.Furthermore, increased VLGC ton mile demand will partly be offset by a high level of newbuild deliveries, and we maintain our view that no further newbuild orders remain key to rebalancing the VLGC market. With that, I'd like to open up the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question is from Lukas from ABG.

Regarding your scrapping decision of the LGC, I was wondering, when you look around across the space, do we see more owners taking that kind of a decision during the course of 2019? And if yes, so would you be able to sort of quantify the potential impact of that?

Hi Lucas, thanks for calling in and showing interest, which is appreciated. According to our files, we have 12 VLGCs above the age of 25. And of these 12, we estimate 5 to 6 strong recycling candidates for scrapping in 2019. And I think I've said it before, our philosophy around this is, of course, that when you have a ship older than 25 years or you're looking at your, say, even fifth special service, coming at year 25, facing a significant CapEx investment both on the docking itself but also on ballast water treatment systems and receiving relatively high steel values from the subcontinent right now, we think that might be the way that more owners are thinking. And of course, on top of that -- yes, 5, 6 strongly recycling candidates.

And then could you just sort of just shed maybe a little bit more color how you expect the -- your newly setup division sort of to operate in bay-to-bay context?

Well, of course, we're enormously excited with the new initiative. And as I emphasized, it's low risk, it's fully integrated, and the overall objective here is to service our shipping clients and improve the utilization of our overall business. But the -- as they said -- in place, there is a -- the desk is there. We have hired the people, we have implemented the systems. For the last couple of months the team has been working on, say, dummy fixtures. So everything is ready. Elaine and her team has worked on getting the credit finance in place. So that -- there's, of course -- the team will be working by being in direct contact with the market. And then, of course, when there is a ship -- shipping position within our fleet where we have no takers, no clients that can see use for the ship, then that is an ideal candidate for the use for our Product Services team.

And do you sort of intend to -- predominately, is it on the U.S. Far East trade or could it sort of apply globally?

It could certainly apply globally. And I think we'd like to keep the cards a little bit closer to the chest right now on exactly where our focus will be. But we do have a global view on this. Our ships are globally, so will the team be.

Your next question is from Peder who is from Fearnley Securities.

Just quickly, I just have one more question on the spot performance. And as you say, you have historically been performing well above, at least, in line within -- and right now, at least, in our numbers you're well below, I was wondering if you could elaborate a bit more on exactly what went wrong in this quarter and also to what extent you have been able to kind of fix the or cover the available ships early in the first quarter?

Sorry, I didn't hear the end of that sentence. If we have also what, sorry?

If you can talk a bit about to what extent you have been able to cover, call it, the idle ships early in the first quarter?

Yes, I think -- I try to deliberately be as precise as possible during the script, so -- but of course, I'd be happy to elaborate on it further. I think the two main items that -- so as I said on the call, our strategy was to position our ships well into December where we normally see a bit of hectic period ahead of the holiday seasons. So that was also what our market intelligence showed us to do this year. Then the oil price dropped quite a bit. And then sort of to be very specific, it actually had a very small hike. It came up a little bit shortly thereafter and after which is dropped significantly again. And I think at that point this is where the market -- buyers retract from the market, the -- and that basically led to considerable reduced number of exports from the U.S. The other main factor is the very cold U.S. winter. We saw last year, when we look at the meteorological data, we saw last year's winter as a strong outlier in terms of the LPG domestic consumption in the U.S. due to the winter heating demand. And unfortunately, this year's winter turned out to be just as bad, so to say, from an LPG export point of view. So those were the two main factors that took us a little bit by surprise. And of course, when you then start fixing in a falling market, you just don't get the best fixtures out there. And of course the idea was to get those fixtures within the month of December so we could go along on most of these voyages well into Q1 where we expected the market to be weak. So we're working on that right now, as we speak. The market in the first quarter is certainly weak and quite top for everyone concerned. But as I said on the call, we're quite optimistic when we look at into the year, and we think soon as the cold spur in the U.S. disappear, we'll see exports coming out with quite some strength in just both new -- and there's new volumes being added to the market as well.

And just another question, I probably asked this before, but speaking to most owners, most people don't seem to be concerned that the majority of the order book now is trader controlled. But we see time and time again that the traders are having a massive impact on the market. Then I was wondering, has this view from you guys changed or is it still the same that the ship is a ship?

Well, I mean, it's absolutely true that about 80% of newbuild orders are trader controlled, and we have definitely seen a lot of relapse in the market, which has certainly pushed down the Baltic. Of course, if we were to consider those 2 camps of traditional owners, on one side trader relapse, on the other, of course, most traders consider their shipping cost as sunk. And of course, if they need to do corrections, it's more about salvaging the P&L on an immediate basis without necessarily thinking overall too much about the wider Baltic market. Whereas, of course, the traditional ship-owners, including ourselves, are in the other camp trying to support the freight level, so we get to a regional basis. And I think that's kind of the -- that's the environment we're in right now.

[Operator Instructions] As there are no questions in queue, we will now take questions from the webcast.

Hello, we have one question on the webcast here. It's from Axel Styrman from Nordea. And he asks, which questions were affected by the impairment, the VLGCs or LGCs or both? And if VLGCs, old or new or both? LGCs or LVPs.

Both the LGCs and LGCs are affected by the impairment.

Yes, I think that answers that question.

And he also asked, new or old?

It's a mix.

Okay.

Did you want to add a comment on our overall impairment policy?

Well, I think it's important for us to note here that our accounting policy is the higher of discounted cash flows and the broker valuations. However, historically, at BW LPG, we have been more conservative than most by looking at our valuation at each quarter-end using the average of two broker valuations. And so this impairment that we have taken on our books at the end of this quarter reflects the average of two broker values that we've been using consistently since we -- even before we IPO-ed as a company. So this is the $34 million that we've taken at the end of Q4.

Okay. Then there's no further questions on the webcast.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we have come to the end of today's presentation. Thank you for attending BW LPG's fourth quarter 2018 financial results presentation. More information on BW LPG is available online at www.bwlpg.com. Goodbye.