Thanks. So let's start -- I'll just run us quickly through the second quarter, some of the main results. So firstly, on the revenue side, we had a good revenue quarter. We sold 205,000 ounces at an average realized price of $1,861 per ounce for revenues of $382 million. So it's a bit higher than we thought we were going to have. Obviously, we sold a bit more than we thought with positive production and also revenue was higher than we forecasted. On the production side, total from our operating mines, 209,000 ounces from our 3 mines for the quarter. We included our share of calibers results, total production reported was 224,000 ounces. So both of those total is probably in line with the budget. Fekola had another strong quarter, 123,000 ounces, in line with budget and its Fekola's processing facilities actually achieved record quarterly throughput of 2.42 million tonnes in the Q, which is very impressive and higher-than-budgeted throughput, though was offset by lower-than-budgeted mill feed grade as we use the gain, low-grade stockpiles to feed that additional budgeted feed. Reminder to that Fekola's production is expected to be significantly weighted to the second half of 2022 when mining reaches the higher-grade portions of Phase 6 in the Fekola pit. I should also comment on the recoveries in the quarter were slightly lower, 92.4% in the budget of 94%. And that's mainly because we had lower availability of lime because of some of the actions that were in place in Mali. So that led us to reach some of what we were doing and reduced recoveries in the quarter. However, with the sanctions now left, all reagents are now available, so that shouldn't be an issue going forward. Masbate production in the Q, 54,000 ounces, slightly above budget of about 1,000 ounces. And with process time, which is about 6% or above budget, which was offset by lower-than-budgeted process grade. The higher than budgeted throughput really came from continuous optimization of the grinding circuit. -- and the lower the budgeted process grade came mainly from lower than budgeted mine grades at the bottom of Montana pit, which is now effectively mined out. At Prodakoto, 31,000 ounces, slightly below budget, 2,000 ounces below budget, and that was really due to slower-than-planned ramp-up in development at the Wolfshag underground mine. We did replace the underground mining contractor and those development rates at which age have improved. And we now expect that we'll hit development ore in the third quarter of the third quarter and then still for production sometime in the fourth quarter. So it's basically -- we pushed that out 1 quarter from where we thought it would be before -- and we did see lower grades as well because we're not getting into that full shut higher grade as quickly as we thought. So when we take all that into account, we did reguide production in Woche went a production release a little early in the month. So it was 175,000 and 185,000 ounces. We reguided down by 10% to between 165,000 and 175,000 ounces for the year. But we did have an offset at Ms. Bay because Masbate was already year-to-date at 7,000 ounces ahead of budget. So we reguided Masbate upwards by 10,000 ounces. And so overall, total production guidance for the full year remains unchanged. And Clive alluded to or mentioned the positive cost results for the period so we definitely saw some good results. On the cash cost side, including all our operations, including NurseCaliber, total cash costs are so $181 per ounce. -- compared to budgets 95%. So we're actually under budget or broadly our budget, I guess, we could say. And that's -- when you look at that, it's really as a result, we did have lower-than-budget tonnage at some operations, but this was offset at all operations by higher-than-budgeted realized fuel prices. So when we took those 2 main factors into account, we ended up broadly on budget for the quarter. Fekola has always led the way, $639 per ounce, that was $64 under budget, and it was a result of lower than budgeted total mining processing and site general costs. Total mining costs were lower due to lower overall tonnes being mined and that was partially offset by higher than budgeted fuel prices, as I mentioned. And the mine tonnes were lower than budget due to as a temporary change in mine sequencing. And again, it relates back to those Ecossanctions, the availability of some reagents and other supplies meant that we've temporarily changed our mine sequencing. We expect to regain that and put it back on track for the full year -- and on Dakota. Otjikoto was $1,136 per ounce, which is $24 under budget. And in total, under budget as a result of a weaker nominian dollar and delays in incurring the Wolfshag underground mining costs, but again, partially offset by higher fuel prices. Bay was maybe the outlier for the Q in. So it's cost for the cash cost for the quarter were $840 per ounce, which is actually more than $100 over budget, and that's almost exclusively due to higher-than-budgeted diesel and fuel pass in the Philippines. And on the all-in sustained cost side, we really saw that merit gain. The consolidated all-in sustaining costs include uracaliber were $1,111 which was $78 under budget. And that beat against budget was mirrored holies apart from Masbate and really, it's a function of, again, lower than budgeted cash costs, higher gains on fuel derivatives and lower sustaining CapEx. And the lower sustaining CapEx as we've seen quarter-to-quarter is just a function of timing. We think that the full CapEx that we expect to incur for the year will be incurred later in 2020, we will catch up. And then Masbate, it was $1,082 per ounce or 28% over budget, and that really mirrors the fact that we were over budget on the cash cost side, partially up lower budgeted CapEx in the cut. But again, we think those be thought of -- then year-to-date, a couple of comments on year-to-date where we are for the 6 months. So we're 12,000 ounces ahead of budget overall, total including in all operations, our share of calipers that's positive. And like I said, we've retained our overall budgeted production guidance for the year. On the cash cost side, including all operations and our share of caliber, we were $52 under budget on the cash cost side on $193 under budget year-to-date on the all-in sustaining cost side. As I mentioned, the cash cost side, we've just seen some gains there in Q1, offset based on the fuel price increases that we've seen coming in mainly in Q2. The all-in sustaining cost side, we're well under budget and that is a function, as you mentioned, those lower cash costs, timing of CapEx, which all of which we expect to see reverse later in the year and also some higher derivative gains. But overall, very positive first half of the year performance. And so what we've seen overall, though, is that we did see fuel prices increase through the Q. And as we look forward and reforecast for the year, we did forecast higher than budgeted fuel prices across our operations. So that led us to revise the second half cost guidance for each operation, we revise that upwards -- but because the -- we had such a positive first half, when you put it all together, we still guided on an overall consolidated basis that our cost guidance is maintained. For cash costs, we think we'll come in at the upper end of our consolidated range of $600 to $640 per ounce. And on the all-in sustaining cost side, we still think we'll be in that overall consolidated range of $1,000 to $1,000, $40 per ounce. So very positive, I think, on the overall operating results as they are. In terms of other things that are happening in the operation, I think Clive can mention most of them. Obviously, Fekola and moly regional development is a big thing for us, and Polvetouched on all of those things. We do expect to see Oklo, that deal close sometime mid-September. And then, as part of that and part of what we disclosed in the releases, we are looking at how best to optimize that Fekola complex regional development. We've got 4 licenses there now, including Meda and Bakolobi, Mankato, the Taco and now we've got Opacoming on expected mid-September. And so we're really -- we've just been looking at those, just trying to decla what's the optimal wage feed percolate higher grade saprolite in the short term? And then also looking at that bigger picture of what we want to do maybe longer term with potentially a second melt Manacoto. So that's a big focus for us. studies are underway. I think we expect to happen by year-end. And then I think we now see that saprolite truck we maybe start sometime in the second quarter '23. And Clive, I think the other main thing we focused on in the quarterly results of looking in Gramalote and evaluating our options. There's something Clive already touched on that. A couple of things to highlight on the earnings side. We did see some volatility on foreign exchange. So we saw some foreign exchange being and losses there mainly due to cash holding that we all need to cut in some of the payables that we have locally. And then on the tax side, we did see higher taxes than we expected in the second quarter, and we tried to highlight that in the release. And those are really related to 2 things. One was, again, fluctuations in foreign exchange led us to some hits on the future income tax site due to that. And then, also on the folditaxside, we had approximately $22 million of holding taxes that we had to pay in the second quarter related to dividends, intercompany dividends that we declared in Mali, which are a little higher than we thought they were. So we had to pay the taxes upfront, and that impacted the overall tax charge. On one other I have to know on the derivative side, we do have -- we are so seeing the gains and the benefits of our fuel hedging program. We had just under $8 million of gains on fuel hedges in the Q. And year-to-date, we've seen $27 million. And we took a look back at how that's done since really the inception of Covid March '20 when it came on when we really started seeing fuel prices start to fluctuate. And since March '20, we've either realized or recorded gains of approximately $50 million since I've started. So we've got about $20 million of that still on the books that we expect to online over the course of the next year, 1.5 years. I will say also on the fuel side that we had a rolling program where we were trying to put on 50% of 1 year's needs and 25% of the next year's needs. As we've seen fuel peak becomes so high. We've stepped back from putting on new hedges because it's very hard to tell exactly what the volatility that is. But we still have 30% of our needs hedged for the balance of 2022 and 18% in 2022. And a couple of comments on maybe -- or sorry, on the earnings side. So earnings, EPS, GAAP EPS of $0.04 per share and adjusted EPS also $0.04 per share. Year-to-date, EPS was $0.11 per share, and adjusted EPS was $0.10 per share. And maybe just a couple of comments on the cash flow side. So cash provided by operating activities for the quarter. This is after changes in working cap of $125 million or approximately $0.12 per share from a non-GAAP basis. And then year-to-date, operating cash flows after working capital changes were $232 million, approximately $0.22 per share. I remind everyone as well, just like we guided on the production side, production is definitely weighted to the second half. It's approximately 40% half 1, 60% half 2. And cash flow is also weighted much more significantly in the second half of the year. We had guided operating cash flow initially $625 million for the year. That assumes a $1,900 gold price for fiscal 2022. We've reguided now slightly downwards to $575 million for the year, and that reflects the effect that we're now using $1,700 for the second half of the year. And like we showed in our cost guidance, we do expect there to be some higher costs due to inflation mainly fuel in hit in the second half and also just the time of some working capital items. So operating cash flow for the year currently forecast assuming $1,700 gold for the balance of 2022 to be $575 million. We ended the period to $587 million in the bank, $600 million undrawn on the line and in great shape of liquidity waste. And we continue to pay that as Clive mentioned to one of the highest dividends in the sector, $0.04 a share per quarter approximately $170 million annualized for the year. So a very good step there. And that rounds out I think what I was going to mention on the financial results.